Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Otra vuelta de tuerca: Biblioteca de Grandes Escritores
Otra vuelta de tuerca: Biblioteca de Grandes Escritores
Otra vuelta de tuerca: Biblioteca de Grandes Escritores
Ebook172 pages2 hours

Otra vuelta de tuerca: Biblioteca de Grandes Escritores

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Ebook con un sumario dinámico y detallado: Una institutriz acude al cuidado de dos niños en una vetusta mansión victoriana. Lo que en principio parece un cometido agradable derivará en una situación de pesadilla. Los niños viven impactados por un pasado inmediato en el que la anterior institutriz, la señorita Jessel, y Peter Quint, el criado y ayudante de cámara del patrón (el tío de los niños) mantenían una turbia relación. Se podría suponer que se dieron ciertos abusos. La vida junto a la institutriz y su muerte posterior han dejado en ellos una huella indeleble. La protagonista de la historia, al tratar de ayudar a los niños, comienza a percibir las apariciones de los fantasmas de la anterior institutriz, muerta en extrañas circunstancias, pasan por ellas los niños y la institutriz. Henry James (Nueva York, 15 de abril de 1843 - Londres, 28 de febrero de 1916) fue un escritor y crítico literario estadounidense (aunque pasó mucho tiempo en Europa y se nacionalizó británico casi al final de su vida) de finales del siglo XIX y principios del XX, conocido por sus novelas y relatos basados en la técnica del punto de vista, que le permite el análisis psicológico de los personajes desde su interior.
LanguageEspañol
Release dateMar 31, 2015
ISBN9783959281942
Otra vuelta de tuerca: Biblioteca de Grandes Escritores
Author

Henry James

Henry James was born in New York in 1843, the younger brother of the philosopher William James, and was educated in Europe and America. He left Harvard Law School in 1863, after a year's attendance, to concentrate on writing, and from 1869 he began to make prolonged visits to Europe, eventually settling in England in 1876. His literary output was both prodigious and of the highest quality: more than ten outstanding novels including his masterpiece, The Portrait of a Lady; countless novellas and short stories; as well as innumerable essays, letters, and other pieces of critical prose. Known by contemporary fellow novelists as 'the Master', James died in Kensington, London, in 1916.

Related to Otra vuelta de tuerca

Related ebooks

General Fiction For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Otra vuelta de tuerca

Rating: 3.2844827586206895 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

116 ratings93 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Chilling! That ending is utterly chilling!
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    At Bly, a country estate in 19th century England, a young woman is hired as a governess for two young children who have been recently orphaned after the death of their parents. The home belongs to the children’s uncle who, although their legal guardian, wants nothing to do with them. At first, all is seemingly well, as the governess is thoroughly charmed with the beauty, intelligence, and disposition of her charges. Soon enough, though, things take a serious turn for the worse when she begins to see the ghosts of two former employees of the estate who seem to have malicious intentions toward the children. But are these apparitions real and, if so, why is the governess the only one who can see them? Alternatively, is she slowly descending into madness, or afflicted by some other malady? What are the secrets that the children seem to be protecting? How does the uncle’s apparent indifference factor into the situation? What explains the ultimate fates that the children and the governess experience?Those are all excellent questions. Of course, one of the things that has kept The Turn of the Screw relevant fiction for more than a century is that Henry James never really answers any of them. Instead, he offers a psychologically complex gothic horror story that allows readers to decide—or at least try to—for themselves what actually happens. Certainly, the author’s innovations in this tale were hugely influential on many subsequent artists; over the years, the novella has inspired works in literature, film, theater, and even opera. What the book is not, unfortunately, is a particularly interesting or compelling narrative in the modern context. James wrote with a bloated, overly wordy style that severely minimized the impact of the suspense in the tale. Although described by some critics as “chillingly evil” and “sinister,” I found the story to fall well short of those marks, with the horrific elements often buried in long passages of verbose inner monologue from a very unreliable narrator. So, while I am glad to have read the book for its historical importance, it was not one that I especially enjoyed.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Another genre classic that I hadn't read for a long time-and this time with good reason. James' way with a convoluted sentence often makes me want to scream, and having to backtrack to work out his intended focus does not make for a smooth flow in reading experience.

    That said, there is a definite power in this tale, and it builds nicely in dread and atmosphere to a chilling conclusion. It is definitely a classic of the genre, but the movie THE INNOCENTS showed how it could have been done in a more straightforward, yet still distinctly superior, fashion, and Peter Straub's retelling in GHOST STORY is also a superior version.

    Could easily have been a 5 star tale, and saying that, I've nudged it up from 3 to 4 this time around. It could be a long, long time before I want to read it again though.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    A tale of a ghost in Victorian England.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Written in 1898 and republished numerous times Turn of the Screw has also been adapted for the stage, television and the big screen. Someone told me it was even mentioned in an episode of "Lost" (I wouldn't know). James's technique is to tell the story within a frame - one story within another. We are first introduced to a man at a Christmas party telling a tale of a governess. From there we are in the story, told from the point of view of the governess. She has been hired to look after two small children after their parents are killed and they are sent to live on an uncle's estate. Soon after the governess's arrival she starts to notice strange occurances, shadowy figures stalking the grounds. She learns they are former lovers and hired hands, back to supposedly recreate their relationship through the children.While James uses words like "hideous", "sinister", "detestable", and "dangerous", there is great debate as to exactly what he is describing as so terrible. He refers to evil again and again, but his ghosts are not the usual spectors. They only hint at danger rather than taking action and "attacking". The other great debate is whether the governess is insane (or goes insane while at Bly). Because no one else really backs up her ghost sightings you have to wonder.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I've never read Henry James, but I love ghost stories, and this is one of the classic ghost stories. I loved the ambiguity-- but the dense language lost me from time to time. You can certainly see its influence on modern horror literature, film and pop culture.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Tangled Victorian prose spoils this otherwise good ghost story. The scene where the governess meets the spectre of Peter Quint on the stairs is genuinely scary. I don't think I would read this one again just for enjoyment, so I'm going to register & release it on BookCrossing.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    eBook

    Reading The Turn of the Screw is like few other reading experiences I've ever had. It's perhaps most similar to Faulkner's unwillingness to explicitly explore the trauma driving his characters, but taken to an extreme far beyond that. Does James truly know what is happening in the story? Perhaps, but given that the governess, despite her overwhelming certainty in her own beliefs, is one of literature's least-trustworthy narrators, it is impossible for any reader to have total certainty about any part of her story.

    It's her certainty, paradoxically, that makes the governess such a compelling character. Presented with events she doesn't fully comprehend, she leaps to conclusions with a startling suddenness, and once adopted, treats those conclusions as absolute facts. It is, in fact, her certainty that leads to so much doubt on the part of the reader, even as it is responsible for the creation of the story itself. Clearly, the story as written, whether true or not, is the governess' creation. Throughout, she fills in every narrative gap, cutting off the statements of others so as to complete their statements herself, or painting in vivid terms the motivations and imaginings of characters that would otherwise have remained hidden. As readers, we're not allowed our own suppositions about the other characters or the events of the story. The governess tells us what they say, think, believe, and do, leaving us only a binary option, befitting greatly the way her own mind works: do we believe her or not?

    No matter our efforts, we can never really know if there were ghosts at Bly Manor, but in the end, that's irrelevant. The ghosts exist inside the governess' head, perhaps not as the spirits of the former governess and her lover, but at least in the form of the world constructed within the current governess' head. In a strange way, she is both narrator and reader of her own story, not only telling us what is happening, but simultaneously inviting us to join her in her own understanding of what she witnesses.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Intense? No. Boring.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I just didn't get it? It didn't get me? It literally did not pull me into the story or hold my true interest. Perhaps a second reading/listening in the future.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A horror classic. The story is conducive to so many readings; the most obvious question, that of the narrator's sanity, gives rise to two completely different but equally compelling narratives. There is a lot of complexity packed into this short novel, and it is clear why it continues to be of interest to literary critics and readers alike. Of course, it hails from the Victorian era, so you have to be willing to wade through the overly verbose inner monologue and the ludicrously heightened displays of emotion. These can make it a bit of a chore to read, but the bones of this story are rock-solid. And to be fair, it's hard to imagine the crucial atmosphere, full of traumatic secrets and implied confessions, remaining intact without the sense of aristocratic Victorian propriety.

    I will say that this was not an emotionally satisfying read. Whether supernatural or not, there is a very real terror that permeates this story: the theme of children helpless and voiceless in the face of abuse from their caretakers. For a new parent especially, it's deeply upsetting, and it is delivered without any final catharsis. I was left with just a sense of hopelessness and loss at the end, and I was happy to have my son in my arms to hold.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I've hesitated for a while now on writing this review. For one thing, I had to re-read the book. I "read" it first as a recording in my car. While that often works quite well (I highly recommend Frank Muller's reading of Moby Dick), it didn't seem to work here. I had a little trouble following the characters' motivations and felt like I was missing something. When I got to one very dramatic, tension-filled moment during a "driveway moment," I turned off my car, excited about what would happen next. When I got back into the car later, all I heard was "The End." I backed the CD up, listened to the final scene again, but that was it. Really?

    So I decided to give it another try. I'd heard that some work by Henry James is important to find in its first edition, because he made changes later in life that aren't really improvements. I checked online and looked through the 4 or 5 editions in my local library, but all the versions I found ended with the same line (I don't want to repeat the line here because it gives a major plot twist away, but I will say that the story never returns to the frame story it opens with).

    I re-read the book on my kindle, and I enjoyed it much more than the recorded version. The tension between whether the ghosts are really haunting the estate or whether the governess is making it all up (and what her motivations might be for doing so) comes through much stronger, and that's such a fascinating thread throughout the story. But I still felt let down by the ending. There's not really any foreshadowing of the event, which seems to jump out of nowhere in only the last SIX WORDS of the book. There's no explanation of what happens afterward, no denouement of any kind. It just... ends.

    So, while I liked the book as a whole, I might "Jane Eyre" this one, meaning that I'll likely invent a new ending for it in my head to feel a little more satisfied.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Is the absence of explanations that makes this book interesting. Too many unknowns and just some answers
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Having read this, I stared at the last page on my Kindle, trying to decide how I felt about it. And I'm not sure. I enjoyed reading it, I enjoyed the slow unfurling of the menace of it. I liked the ambiguity, being unable to ensure if the governess were going mad or whether there really were ghosts. And I loved the starkness of the ending.

    At the same time, I don't know, there was something lacking. I got to the end and felt -- is that it? Is that all the pay off we're going to get? And yet, at the same time, I didn't think there was anything more that needed to be added. A strange, strange feeling.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I had a hard time with the language on this one...tough to follow. And I was continually frustrated with the governness in regards to Miles--if she wanted to know why he was kicked out of school, she should have asked him from the beginning, or written a letter to the headmaster!! It just seemed really odd that she decided not to mention it to him at all when he first came home. There was a lot of communication that was not happening. I did like the psychological element to it, and the possibly unreliable narrator. I was hoping it would be creepier than it turned out to be! I just didn't feel as much of an emotional connection to the characters.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    I suppose it's because of how old the story is, that I found the mystery/ story unsuspenseful. I've never seen so many unnecessary words used to describe the simplest of things! My mind was left strained and uncaring towards the end.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A little novel about a dear little boy and a dear little girl, who are plagued by ghosts of of their previous caretakers, who may or may not have taken part in little perversions. The little children live in a mansion full of little rooms, run by a governess who may be a little crazy. The plot suffers from a little bit of ambiguity. I guess it's time to read a dozen critical essays on this classic. Until then, 3 - more than a little generous - stars.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I've read [Washington Square] (which I liked) and [Portrait of a Woman] which I didn't like - now here's another one by Henry James that I didn't like.This is about a governess who takes care of two children and the landlord or master or whatever is not around - and then she sees dead people (ghosts) (former employees) - or does she? And do the children see the manifestations? There's nothing all that shocking about these ghost's - but I wondered about the children's behavior. There was something eerie about them, but I couldn't put my finger on it exactly - and of course the ending is up to discussion, and I won't go there. No need to, because frankly, half way through I was quite indifferent. All the repetitions and speculations and strange conversations…It was too much. The writing is very "rich" or "complex" and I struggled with the sentences, having to read them twice or three times and sometimes I just gave up. So even though it's a short novel it took forever to finish. Only because I can be so stubborn sometimes with novels.But as it is a very popular classic I guess other's have very different experience with it….
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Turn of the Screw is the classic story of the unreliable narrator. A governess is given charge of two children on a rather isolated estate in England. She has taken the job because it was offered by a man she has romanticized, a man she wants to impress, a man who is conspicuously absent at the estate. The two precocious children are mysterious in their beauty, their behavior, and their background. They have a bond with each other, as well as with one staffmember that borders on collusion. They have secrets, revealed in bits about their previous governess and a licentious groundskeeper who had inappropriate relationships, implied in a Victorian manner. The two predecessors, though dead, figure prominently in the story as the heroine must protect the children from their ghosts. James's method of relating the story through a third generation narrator brings into question whether the ghosts are "real" or the illusion of the governess, who, throughout the story, is defending herself. The opening chapter may be overlooked for its importance as it only introduces the thrilling tale, but much has been speculated on James's intent in using a narrator who is the friend of a man who once loved the governess, who may edit the story to defend him who may have edited the story that came from the governess herself. Love may make you do crazy things, which is why the governess's great threat is questionable in the first place. The story may be my favorite of James's works because it is different from his longer novels. He uses the unreliable narrator, in a style like Poe's, and implied psychology, leaving ambiguity for the reader to interpret.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I know this is supposed to be a classic psychological gothic-type mystery, but I just didn't find it very effective. Yes, there is a big scary secret revealed, but from my point of view (as a reader and movie-watcher in the 21st century), it just wasn't as unnerving as it was meant to be. Perhaps it should be viewed as the predecessor of all the psychological thrillers around today.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Against my better judgment, I read this, my second Henry James story. So tedious! The exquisite sensitivities of his protagonist are absurd and prevent her from achieving a simple solution on every page. The protagonist and James' prose were exasperating enough to overwhelm the psychological tension and creepiness that this story is supposed to exhibit so well. William remains my favorite of the James brothers, for sure. I'll do my best to avoid Henry in the future.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Another one of the scariest books I have ever read. Really creepy, perfect for reading around the fire by candlelight.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Any writer can make a cemetery or haunted house scary, but a good writer can make terrifying the absolutely ordinary. Henry James does this in Turn of the Screw, which is a ghost story about a governess who finds herself stuck with loving but haunted charges.This mini-novel is densely written, so if you're fresh off Stephen King and want blood, gore, and one-liners, you're not going to find it here. Turn of the Screw is an old-fashioned gothic story, full of expensive manors and apparitions in the study. But if you can get through the dense language, you'll find a terrific atmosphere. At first everything will seem normal, but a sense of unease will creep up on you. You'll realize that there's something not quite right with the children or the governess. You'll feel the macabre before you can even put a name to it, and you'll start to question what is real and what is psychological. This is horror the way it used to be, and the way it should be again.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I thought I would never make it through the first chapter, but I did and enjoyed finishing it. I made it through 2 books that were 400 pages + during the same time it took me to finish this 120 page book. Tedious, very difficult to read but enjoyable once I got into it. It has since made any semi-difficult read a breeze.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    I've never read any Henry James before (a terrible admission for an English graduate) so I really wanted to love this book. I didn't.I thought the language was stilted and unnecessary, the story was something and nothing hugely padded out with superfluous narrative and the characters two dimensional. Plus it didn't scare me at all. Some ghost story!!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I don't think it has to be interpreted as either/or imagination or ghosts. I think it can be both. I also think there's some interesting things implied about the relationship between the governess and the older boy.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Very interesting gothic ghost (maybe?) story. Wonderful unreliable narrator who may be mad and imagining the whole thing. Or maybe the ghosts are real. Or perhaps she is mad, but isn't imagining it at all.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This book by Henry James is a ghost story. The story is told by an unnamed governess who takes her first job as governess of two children. She is delighted with her charges but soon thinks they are scheming against her and then she gets them alone and accuses them. The author's style is ambiguous and I have more questions than answers after reading this novella.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    A ghost story with a horrific overtone.Victorian obscurity in expression, so not to say anything that could be objectionable. Took me a while to figure out what was worrying the governess.220
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Even though the English is not the easiest, the books reads like a charm. The turn of the screw really is a great story that gets under your skin.

Book preview

Otra vuelta de tuerca - Henry James

tuerca

LA HISTORIA NOS HABÍA MANTENIDO ALREDEDOR DEL FUEGO...

Índice

La historia nos había mantenido alrededor del fuego lo suficientemente expectantes, pero fuera del innecesario comentario de que era horripilante, como debía serlo por fuerza todo relato que se narrara en vísperas de navidad en una casa antigua, no recuerdo que produjera comentario alguno aparte del que hizo alguien para poner de relieve que era el único caso que conocía en que la visión la hubiese tenido un niño.

Se trataba, debo mencionarlo, de una aparición que tuvo lugar en una casa tan antigua como aquella en que nos reuníamos: una aparición monstruosa a un niño que dormía en una habitación con su madre, a quien despertó aquél presa del terror; pero al despertarla no se desvaneció su miedo, pues también la madre había tenido la misma visión que atemorizó al niño. Aquella observación provocó una respuesta de Douglas —no de inmediato, sino más tarde, en el curso de la velada—, una respuesta que tuvo las interesantes consecuencias que voy a reseñar. Alguien relató luego una historia, no especialmente brillante, que él, según pude darme cuenta, no escuchó. Eso me hizo sospechar que tenía algo que mostrarnos y que lo único que debíamos hacer era esperar. Y, en efecto, esperamos hasta dos noches después; pero ya en esa misma sesión, antes de despedirnos, nos anticipó algo de lo que tenía en la mente.

—Estoy absolutamente de acuerdo en lo tocante al fantasma del que habla Griffin, o lo que haya sido, el cual, por aparecerse primero al niño, muestra una característica especial. Pero no es el primer caso que conozco en que se involucre a un niño. Si el niño produce el efecto de otra vuelta de tuerca, ¿qué me dirían ustedes de dos niños?

—Por supuesto —exclamó alguien—, diríamos que dos niños significan dos vueltas. Y también diríamos que nos gustaría saber más sobre ellos.

Me parece ver aún a Douglas, de pie ante la chimenea a la que daba en ese momento la espalda y mirando a su interlocutor con las manos en los bolsillos.

—Yo soy el único que conoce la historia. Realmente, es horrible.

Esto, repetido en distintos tonos de voz, tendía a valorar más la cosa, y nuestro amigo, con mucho arte, preparaba ya su triunfo mientras nos recorría con la mirada y puntualizaba:

—Ninguna otra historia que haya oído en mi vida se le aproxima.

—¿En cuanto a horror? —pregunté.

Pareció vacilar; trató de explicar que no se trataba de algo tan sencillo, y que él mismo no sabía cómo calificar aquellos acontecimientos. Se pasó una mano por los ojos e hizo una mueca de estremecimiento.

—Lo único que sé —concluyó— es que se trata de algo espantoso.

—¡Oh, qué delicia! —exclamó una de las mujeres.

Él ni siquiera la advirtió; miró hacia mí, pero como si, en vez de mi persona, viera aquello de lo que hablaba.

—Por todo lo que implica de misterio, de fealdad, de espanto y de dolor.

—Entonces —le dije—, lo que debes hacer es sentarte y comenzar a contárnoslo.

Se volvió nuevamente hacia el fuego, empujó hacia él un leño con la punta del zapato, lo observó por un instante y luego se encaró otra vez con nosotros.

—No puedo comenzar ahora: debo enviar a alguien a la ciudad.

Se alzó un unánime murmullo cuajado de reproches, después del cual, con aire ensimismado, Douglas explicó:

—La historia está escrita. Está guardada en una gaveta; ha estado allí durante años. Puedo escribir a mi sirviente y mandarle la llave para que envíe el paquete tal como lo encuentre.

Parecía dirigirse a mí en especial, como si solicitara mi ayuda para no echarse atrás. Había roto una costra de hielo formada por muchos inviernos, y debía haber tenido razones suficientes para guardar tan largo silencio. Los demás lamentaron el aplazamiento, pero fueron precisamente aquellos escrúpulos de Douglas lo que más me gustó de la velada. Lo apremié para que escribiera por el primer correo a fin de que pudiésemos conocer aquel manuscrito lo antes posible. Le pregunté si la experiencia en cuestión había sido vivida por él. Su respuesta fue inmediata:

—¡Oh no, a Dios gracias!

—Y el manuscrito, ¿es tuyo? ¿Transcribiste tus impresiones?

—No, ésas las llevo aquí —y se palpó el corazón—. Nunca las he perdido.

—Entonces el manuscrito...

—Está escrito con una vieja y desvanecida tinta, con la más bella caligrafía —y se volvió de nuevo hacia el fuego— de una mujer. Murió hace veinte años. Ella me envió esas páginas antes de morir.

Todo el mundo lo estaba escuchando ya en ese momento y, por supuesto, no faltó quien, ante aquellas palabras, hiciera el comentario obligado; pero él pasó por alto la interferencia sin una sonrisa, aunque también sin irritación.

—Era una persona realmente encantadora, a pesar de ser diez años mayor que yo. Fue la institutriz de mi hermana —dijo con voz apagada—. La mujer más agradable que he conocido en ese oficio; merecedora de algo mejor. Fue hace mucho, mucho tiempo, y el episodio al que me refiero había sucedido bastante tiempo atrás. Yo estaba en Trinity, y la encontré en casa al volver en mis segundas vacaciones, en verano. Pasé casi todo el tiempo en casa. Fue un verano magnífico, y en sus horas libres paseábamos y conversábamos en el jardín. Me sorprendieron su inteligencia y encanto. Sí, no sonrían; me gustaba mucho, y aún hoy me satisface pensar que yo también le gustaba. De no haber sido así, ella no me hubiera confiado lo que me contó. Nunca lo había compartido con nadie. Y no sé esto porque ella me lo hubiera dicho, pero estoy seguro de que fue así. Sentía que era así. Ustedes podrán juzgarlo cuando conozcan la historia.

—¿Tan horrible fue aquello?

Siguió mirándome con fijeza.

—Podrás darte cuenta por ti mismo —repitió—, podrás darte cuenta.

Yo también lo miré con fijeza.

—Comprendo —dije—: estaba enamorada.

Rio por primera vez.

—Eres muy perspicaz. Sí, estaba enamorada. Mejor dicho, lo había estado. Eso salió a relucir... No podía contar la historia sin que saliera a relucir. Lo advertí, y ella se dio cuenta de que yo lo había advertido; pero ninguno de los dos volvió a tocar este punto. Recuerdo perfectamente el sitio y el lugar... Un rincón en el prado, la sombra de las grandes hayas y una larga y cálida tarde de verano. No era el escenario ideal para estremecerse; sin embargo, ¡oh...!

Se apartó del fuego y se dejó caer en un sillón.

—¿Recibirás el paquete el jueves por la mañana? —le pregunté.

—Lo más probable es que llegue con el segundo correo.

—Bueno, entonces, después de la cena...

—¿Estarán todos aquí? —preguntó, y nuevamente nos recorrió con la mirada—. ¿Nadie se marcha? —añadió con un tono casi esperanzado.

—¡Nos quedaremos todos!

—¡Yo me quedaré! ¡Y yo también! —gritaron las damas cuya partida había sido ya fijada.

La señora Griffin, sin embargo, mostró su necesidad de saber un poco más:

—¿De quién estaba enamorada?

—La historia nos lo va a aclarar —me sentí obligado a responder.

—¡Oh, no puedo esperar a oír la historia!

—La historia no lo dirá —replicó Douglas— por lo menos, no de un modo explícito y vulgar.

—Pues es una lástima, porque éste es el único modo de que yo pudiera entender algo.

—¿Nos lo dirá usted, Douglas? —preguntó alguien.

Volvió a ponerse de pie.

—Sí... mañana. Ahora debo retirarme a mis habitaciones. Buenas noches.

Y, cogiendo un candelabro, salió dejándonos bastante intrigados. Cuando sus pasos se perdieron en la escalera situada al fondo del salón, la señora Griffin dijo:

—Bueno, podré no saber de quién estaba ella enamorada, pero sí sé de quién lo estaba él.

—Ella era diez años mayor que él —comentó su marido.

Raison de plus..., a esa edad. Pero no deja de resultar agradable su larga reticencia.

—¡De cuarenta años! —precisó Griffin.

—Con este estallido final.

—El estallido —volví a tomar la palabra— constituirá una apasionante velada la noche del jueves.

Todo el mundo estuvo de acuerdo conmigo, y ante esa perspectiva nos desinteresamos de todo lo demás. La última historia, aunque de modo incompleto y dada apenas como introducción de un largo relato, había sido ya iniciada. Nos despedimos y acandelabramos, como alguien dijo, y nos retiramos a dormir.

Supe al día siguiente que una carta conteniendo una llave había sido enviada en el primer correo a la casa de Douglas en Londres; pero, a pesar o, quizás, a causa de la difusión de aquella noticia, lo dejamos en paz hasta después de cenar, como si aquella hora de la noche concordara mejor con la clase de emoción que esperábamos experimentar. Entonces él se mostró tan comunicativo como podíamos desear, y hasta nos aclaró el motivo de su buen humor. Estaba de nuevo frente a la chimenea, como en la noche anterior, en la que tanto nos había sorprendido. Al parecer, el relato que había prometido leernos necesitaba, para ser cabalmente comprendido, unas cuantas palabras como prólogo. Debo dejar aquí sentado con toda claridad que aquel relato, tal como lo transcribí muchos años más tarde, es el mismo que ahora voy a ofrecer a mis lectores. El pobre Douglas, antes de su muerte —cuando ya ésta era inminente—, me entregó el manuscrito que recibió en aquellos días y que en el mismo lugar, produciendo un efecto inmenso, comenzó a leer a nuestro pequeño círculo la noche del cuarto día. Las damas que habían prometido quedarse, a Dios gracias, no lo hicieron: a fin de atender unos previos compromisos, habían tenido que marcharse muertas de curiosidad, agudizada ésta por los pequeños avances que Douglas nos proporcionaba. Lo cual sirvió para que su auditorio final, más reducido y selecto, fuera enterándose de la historia en un estado casi de hipnosis.

El primero de aquellos avances constituía, hasta cierto punto, el principio de la historia, hasta el momento en que la autora la tomaba en sus manos. Los hechos que nos dio a conocer entonces fueron que su antigua amiga, la más joven de varias hijas de un pobre párroco rural, tuvo que dirigirse a Londres a toda prisa, apenas cumplidos los veinte años, para responder personalmente a un anuncio que ya la había hecho entablar una breve correspondencia con el anunciante. La persona que la recibió en una casa de Harley Street amplia e imponente, según la describía ella, resultó ser un caballero, un soltero en la flor de la vida y con una figura nunca vista —aunque vislumbrada tal vez en un sueño o en las páginas de una novela— por una tímida y oscura muchacha salida de una vicaría de Hampshire. No era difícil reconstruir su personalidad, pues, por fortuna, nunca se olvida la imagen de una persona como aquélla. Era apuesto, osado y amable, de fácil trato, alegre y generoso. Aquel hombre tenía por fuerza que impresionarla, no sólo por ser galante y espléndido sino, sobre todo, porque le planteó el asunto como un favor que ella iba a prestarle, como una manera de quedarle obligado para siempre. Esto fue lo que más le llegó al alma, y lo que después le infundió el valor que hubo de menester. Le pareció un hombre rico y terriblemente extravagante, prototipo de la moda y las buenas maneras, poseedor de un vestuario costoso y encantador con las mujeres. Su casa en la ciudad era un palacio lleno de recuerdos de viajes y trofeos de caza; pero era a su residencia campestre, una antigua mansión en Essex, adonde quería que ella se dirigiera inmediatamente.

De resultas de la muerte de sus padres en la India, le había sido confiada la tutela de dos sobrinos, un niño y una niña, hijos de un hermano más joven, militar, fallecido dos años antes. Aquellos niños que extrañamente le había confiado el destino constituían, para un hombre de su posición, soltero y sin la experiencia adecuada ni el menor ápice de paciencia, una pesada carga. Había hecho por ellos todo lo que estaba a su alcance, ya que aquel par de criaturas le producían una infinita piedad. Los había enviado desde luego a su otra casa, ya que ningún lugar podía convenirles tanto como

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1