Unavailable
Unavailable
Unavailable
Ebook113 pages2 hours
Why I Am Not a Christian
Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
Why I am not a Christian and other religious essays: Am I An Atheist Or An Agnostic?; My Religious Reminiscences;Religion and Metaphysics; Has Religion Made Useful Contributions to Civilization?; How I Came by My Creed; Or, What I Believe; Why I Am a Rationalist.
Bertrand Arthur William Russell,18 May 1872–2 February 1970) was a British philosopher, logician, mathematician, historian, writer, social critic and political activist. At various points in his life he considered himself a liberal, a socialist, and a pacifist. In the early 20th century, Russell led the British "revolt against idealism".He is considered one of the founders of analytic philosophy along with his predecessor Gottlob Frege, colleague G. E. Moore, and his protégé Ludwig Wittgenstein. He is widely held to be one of the 20th century's premier logicians. With A. N. Whitehead he wrote Principia Mathematica, an attempt to create a logical basis for mathematics.
Bertrand Arthur William Russell,18 May 1872–2 February 1970) was a British philosopher, logician, mathematician, historian, writer, social critic and political activist. At various points in his life he considered himself a liberal, a socialist, and a pacifist. In the early 20th century, Russell led the British "revolt against idealism".He is considered one of the founders of analytic philosophy along with his predecessor Gottlob Frege, colleague G. E. Moore, and his protégé Ludwig Wittgenstein. He is widely held to be one of the 20th century's premier logicians. With A. N. Whitehead he wrote Principia Mathematica, an attempt to create a logical basis for mathematics.
Unavailable
Author
Bertrand Russell
Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) was born in Wales and educated at Trinity College, Cambridge. His long career established him as one of the most influential philosophers, mathematicians, and social reformers of the twentieth century.
Read more from Bertrand Russell
An Outline of Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The ABC of Relativity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Will to Doubt Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of Philosophizing: And Other Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssays in Skepticism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Analyses of Mind Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Understanding History: And Other Essays Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Complete Works of Bertrand Russell Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Problems of Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (Barnes & Noble Library of Essential Reading) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Great Philosophers Volume One: The Road to Inner Freedom, The Art of Philosophizing, and Pilgrimage to Humanity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroduction to Mathematical Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBertrand Russell – The Complete Collection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreat Philosophers Volume Two: Science and Philosophy, The Preservation of Youth, and Understanding History Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Modern Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBertrand Russell's Dictionary of Mind, Matter and Morals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy Men Fight (Serapis Classics) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Analysis of Mind Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEducation of Character: The Psychology of Children Going to School Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitical Ideals Illustrated Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Problem of China Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Why I Am Not a Christian
Related ebooks
Why I Am Not a Christian and What I Believe (Warbler Classics Annotated Edition) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeek and Find: A starting place for those seeking truth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Reason Why Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStand for God: "Will the Defendant Please Rise?": (Evidence for God's Existence) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFaith, God, And Modern Science: The Clash between Creationism and a Theological Compromise with Atheism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEarth To Eternity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChristian Baptism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWestminster Sermons with a Preface Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGod versus Particle Physics: A No-Score Draw Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Miracle of Man: Evidence for God from Human Nature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn His Image Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Eliminator; or, Skeleton Keys to Sacerdotal Secrets Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDoes God Exist?: Yes, Here Is the Evidence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Perspective of Love: Natural Law in a New Mode Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThree Theological Mistakes: How to Correct Enlightenment Assumptions about God, Miracles, and Free Will Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat Christians Believe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Creation and Its Records: A Brief Statement of Christian Belief with Reference to Modern Facts and Ancient Scripture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Testimony of the Bible Concerning the Assumptions of Destructive Criticism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Flip Side of Rapture: Which Christ Will You Choose? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Finger On The Light Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRevival Sermons Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChrist in the Church: A Volume of Religious Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGodless Folly: Scientific observations that refute materialism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRevelation Confidential Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWithout Excuse: Evidence for Creation by God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Great Doctrines of the Bible Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTable Talks: Unanswered Questions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat Does Nature Teach Us about God? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Religion & Spirituality For You
You Were Born for This: Astrology for Radical Self-Acceptance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Love Dare Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Calendar of Wisdom: Daily Thoughts to Nourish the Soul, Written and Se Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dangerous Prayers: Because Following Jesus Was Never Meant to Be Safe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Healing After Loss: Daily Meditations For Working Through Grief Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gospel of Mary Magdalene Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Gay Girl, Good God: The Story of Who I Was, and Who God Has Always Been Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Course In Miracles: (Original Edition) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5NRSV, Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible: Bringing to Life the Ancient World of Scripture Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Upon Waking: 60 Daily Reflections to Discover Ourselves and the God We Were Made For Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mere Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Writing to Wake the Soul: Opening the Sacred Conversation Within Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gospel of Thomas: The Gnostic Wisdom of Jesus Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Hindu View Of Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Girl, Wash Your Face: Stop Believing the Lies About Who You Are so You Can Become Who You Were Meant to Be Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry Into Values Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5UnClobber: Rethinking Our Misuse of the Bible on Homosexuality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unwanted: How Sexual Brokenness Reveals Our Way to Healing Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jesus and Buddha: The Parallel Sayings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Untethered Soul by Michael Singer: Summary and Analysis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Weight of Glory Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Why I Am Not a Christian
Rating: 4.315789473684211 out of 5 stars
4.5/5
19 ratings13 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5It is quite thought provoking and a nice exercise to reason for all people regardless of their standing in regards of God or a Supreme Being.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A great collection of essays. Makes you think twice about believing stuff at face value. I the concept of Christianity needs to be explored thoroughly. Bertrand makes a lot of sense questioning the validity of its claims. For example; If God is good why does he let bad things happen, even to newly born-babies who haven't sinned. This book is really thought provoking.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Very enlightening.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This is neither Russell's best nor his most cohesive work (there is a good deal of repetition between the essays, and they were written for a number of different venues); however, this is Bertrand Russell we're talking about ... so for this reviewer, anyway, the temptation to mark particularly good passages was strong. For the most part these essays sparkle with the usual fire.I will say that the long Appendix (not written by Russell) detailing how Russell was prevented from teaching at the City College of New York leaves me breathless with revulsion.Certainly in these frighteningly Bible-thumping times in the U.S., this material is highly relevant.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Russell first defines what he means by a Christian: someone who believes in God, the immortality of the soul, and Jesus Christ. Then he explains why he does not believe. Step-by-step he dismisses as fallacious the arguments for the existence of God: the first cause argument, the argument from design, etc. Then he discusses whether we survive death. Then the character of Jesus, as presented in the Gospels. He agrees that Jesus was an admirable man, but not divine and not the best or wisest of men. He gives examples from the Gospels. He believes that all religions are false and harmful. He even calls religion "a disease born of fear" and "a source of untold misery to the human race." Fear leads to cruelty, he says. "A habit of basing convictions upon evidence, and of giving them only that degree of certainty which the evidence warrants, would, if it became general, cure most of the ills from which the world is suffering." He explains his agnostic views with his usual lucidity. Russell was not an atheist; he was just not convinced by the arguments for God. He was always wary of certainties. So this book does not resolve anything, but it will give you plenty to think about. It is not a difficult read.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5One of the first books I read on freethought and agnosticism, this still holds a fond spot for me. Although the arguments presented here would not be new to me at this time, this was the first time I had heard many of them presented. Unlike many of today's philosophers, Russell writes lucid prose with clarity rather than obfuscation. From what I've read, and what I've observed from the philsophy departments I've been associated with, I believe Russell was truly one of the last original thinkers in the field. This book made a big impression on me, and I need to reread it soon.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A classic, and just as powerful today as when it was written.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Honestly this book didn't seem all that focused on religion or Christianity, especially considering Russell seems to always find a way to tie a complaint or two about religion into his books. (At least he has in every one I've read so far, I imagine it would be harder in his math books.) The essay the book takes it's title from doesn't put any significant consideration into why Russell was an atheist, just why he disapproved of the Christian church, which seems like a pretty big piece to leave out of a book by an atheist that's theoretically about religion.There are several essays that directly relate to religion, I really liked "Can Religion Cure Our Troubles" and there are a few that you might be able to kinda sorta relate back to religion, but you'd be making the connection there, not Bertrand. An example of that would be the essay on Thomas Paine. I know Thomas Paine was very outspoken about religion, but the extent to which it comes up in the essay is that he pissed off Jefferson and Washington for running his mouth off about his non traditional beliefs (he was Deist). They shared those beliefs they just weren't about to admit it and didn't like Paine's uncompromising literature. That probably accounts for about two sentences of the essay.Another of my favorites, "Nice People", could certainly point the finger at hypocritical behavior of some Christians...or any other person that projects a mantle of moral superiority while acting without disregard for the well-being of other people. It certainly never singles Christians out, or any other group for that matter. The essay does just fine coyly listing examples of the sorts nice behavior practiced by "nice people". For example:"Above all they keep alive the pleasures of the hunt. In a homogeneous country population, such as that of the English shire, people are condemned to hunt foxes; this is expensive and sometimes even dangerous. Moreover, the fox cannot explain very clearly how much he dislikes being hunted. In all these respects the hunting of the human being is better sport, but if it were not for the nice people, it would be difficult to hunt human beings with a good conscience. Those whom the nice people condemn are fair game; at their call of "Tallyho" the hunt assembles, and the victim is pursued to prison or death. It is especially good sport when the victim is a woman, since this gratifies the jealousy of the women and the sadism of the men."All and all the book is a bit of a mixed bag. Some of the essays are great. But a fair chunk are just so-so and two of them didn't read like Bertrand at all. This is the consequence of the essays being drawn from the first fifty years of Bertrand's writing. Two essays written in the 'ots lack all of the confidence, wit and simplicity that make Bertrand so enjoyable to me. They sounded an awful lot like a unsure, but overachieving college student that tries too hard to write seriously by using cold, formal and overly decorated language.The book ends with a reasonably detailed account of Bertrand's dismissal from New York City College before he actually got a chance to start. It's a pretty outrageous case of ideological bigotry. Though he had widespread support of the college's board, students and their parents Russell was ousted by what amounted to an angry mob and a shady judge that decided that Bertrand's astonishingly modern, but shamelessly misrepresented views on sex, marriage and (egads) masturbation would corrupt students and encourage them to violate New York's penal laws. These were laws that among other things made extramarital sex and cohabitation a felony, especially if it was with "an unmarried female of any age of a previously chaste character".
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5these ratinjgs here are as pernicious and prejorative as the indiv idual's mind who rates the book. having said that, i am joyful with Russell's sardonic style. I do wonder if tghe Lord Bertrand read much of Mark Twain as they both have this acerbic knife they uswe on their enemies (or those who do not agree with them). he essays were read by thiks writer during his early college days (mid 1960s), and I remmeber being enthralled at the man's erudition, yet being "common enough" to be understood by the layman. The piece at the end explaining the process of Lord Russell's being blackballed by the New York city political system was eye-opening. Next time anyone calls a New Yorker a "liberal," I'm going to jump in whatever fray they are in and they WILL take note of what I say. YOU WANT A LIBERAL? read this book.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A call to reason from a great thinker.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The question of whether there is a god, and if so, what our relations with them should be, is a timeless one. I decided to read this book as a counterpoint to a book arguing for the existence and relevance of god a month or two ago. In contrast, Russell's point of view, expressed eloquently and forcefully, is that he believes there not to be a god, and that religion has by and large been a force for tyranny, anti-intellectualism, and negativity in the world through history. He attempts to refute the reasonable arguments for the existence of god, as well as rejecting the moral ones, and finally deploring the policies of religion that have listed until this day, in many cases, such as being anti-contraception.Russell's prose is very well-written and persuasive, and the longest essay of the book, What I Believe, lays out a very interesting way of life for people to follow, as well. Other essays, concerning other atheists and their fate (on Thomas Paine), dealing with children, the ethics of sexuality, and other topics, are also very well done. Since it's a list of essays on similar topics, there is certainly overlap, but it's not too great, and that they were written at different times allows one to see the growth and changes in his thought over time. I really enjoyed this book, and found it both thought-provoking and something that I will carry with me over time. The final essay, regarding how Russell was refused employment at the City College of New York by local government due to his atheism in 1940, shows that the influence of religion on politics and authority were already apparent, and the effects of atheism overblown, even then. It may have gotten worse since, but it's still visible in our past.This one's definitely worth reading, if you have an open mind about the question of religion.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Classic treatise on atheism from a deep thinker. Some essays are better than others (a bit outmoded language) - but a very worthwhile read.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Suffers from being outdated in some places ... and discussion of what makes up "the good life" wanders into some soft territory.