OPERATION FORAGER: Air Power in the Campaign for Saipan
()
About this ebook
The study determines that the role of air power was critical in protecting the amphibious force, defeating the Japanese fleet, decimating land-based Japanese air forces, and supporting the troops on the ground. Air power at Saipan created an environment which made an American victory inevitable.
The study examines the assets available and their effectiveness in various types of air support employed at Saipan, and looks at joint air employment. It concludes that anti-air combat and airfield interdiction were highly successful, while fleet action and close air support were moderately successful. It examines factors involved and the results produced. It concludes that joint operations were conducted, but that these were operations of coexistence rather than real coordination.
Lieutenant Commander Mark D. Tate USN
See Book Description
Related to OPERATION FORAGER
Related ebooks
The Twelfth US Air Force: Tactical And Operational Innovations In The Mediterranean Theater Of Operations, 1943-1944 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Evolution Of Joint Operations During The Civil War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMarine Close Air Support In World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSynchronizing Airpower And Firepower In The Deep Battle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrial By Fire: Forging American Close Air Support Doctrine, World War I Through September 1944 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMarine Close Air Support In Korea 1950-1953 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond the Battle Line: US Air Attack Theory and Doctrine, 1919-1941 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEliminating Fratricide From Attack Helicopter Fires: An Army Aviator's Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBattlefield Air Interdiction In The 1973 Middle East War And Its Significance To NATO Air Operations Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Operation Sealords: A Front In A Frontless War, An Analysis Of The Brown-Water Navy In Vietnam Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Vietnamese Air Force, 1951-1975 — An Analysis Of Its Role In Combat And Fourteen Hours At Koh Tang [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClose Air Support And The Battle For Khe Sanh [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Maritime Kill Web Force in the Making: Deterrence and Warfighting in the 21st Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Air Campaign: Planning For Combat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bombing To Surrender: The Contribution Of Air Power To The Collapse Of Italy, 1943 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFire Support in the Reduction of an Encircled Force - a Forgotten Mission Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCombined Action Platoons In The Vietnam War:: A Unique Counterinsurgency Capability For The Contemporary Operating Environment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProvide by Parachute: Airdrop In Vietnam, 1954-1972 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe U.S. Marines And Amphibious War: Its Theory, And Its Practice In The Pacific Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fleet Tactics and Naval Operations, Third Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5CACTUS Air Power At Guadalcanal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAir Campaigns: Fact Or Fantasy? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilitary Police Operations In The Okinawa Campaign Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art Of Wing Leadership And Aircrew Morale In Combat Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Lucky Seventh In The Bulge: A Case Study For The Airland Battle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Military Strategies Of Spruance And Halsey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe History Of The Airborne Forward Air Controller In Vietnam Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMarines In World War II - Marine Aviation In The Philippines [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKasserine: The Myth and Its Warning for Airland Battle Operations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Wars & Military For You
The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wager Disaster: Mayem, Mutiny and Murder in the South Seas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Plot to Kill Hitler Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Plane in the Sky: An Oral History of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Heart of Everything That Is: The Untold Story of Red Cloud, An American Legend Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Washington: The Indispensable Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/577 Days of February: Living and Dying in Ukraine, Told by the Nation’s Own Journalists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The History of the Peloponnesian War: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for OPERATION FORAGER
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
OPERATION FORAGER - Lieutenant Commander Mark D. Tate USN
This edition is published by PICKLE PARTNERS PUBLISHING—www.picklepartnerspublishing.com
To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books – picklepublishing@gmail.com
Or on Facebook
Text originally published in 1995 under the same title.
© Pickle Partners Publishing 2014, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.
Publisher’s Note
Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.
We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.
OPERATION FORAGER: AIR POWER IN THE CAMPAIGN FOR SAIPAN
By
Lieutenant Commander Mark D. Tate, USN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 4
ABSTRACT 5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 6
CHAPTER ONE — INTRODUCTION 7
The Statement of the Problem and Its Relevance 7
Secondary Questions 7
Limitations and Delimitations 8
The Significance of the Study 9
Assumptions 10
Definition of Terms 11
CHAPTER TWO — LITERATURE REVIEW 12
Books and Other Publications 12
Documents and Official Histories 13
CHAPTER THREE — RESEARCH DESIGN 15
CHAPTER FOUR — SETTING THE STAGE 17
Central Pacific Background Situation 17
U.S. Preparations of the Theater 18
The Operation FORAGER Plan 21
Enemy Forces 23
CHAPTER FIVE — THE BATTLE BEGINS: THE EARLY PHASES 24
Preparation of the Landing Area 24
The Landings 27
The Japanese Respond 29
The Air Battle of the Philippine Sea 30
CHAPTER SIX — AIR OPERATIONS DURING THE BATTLE 38
Forms of Air Support Employed 38
Combat Air Patrol/Anti-air Combat 39
Fleet Action 41
Reconnaissance 42
Antisubmarine Warfare 42
Airfield Interdiction 43
Transport/Medevac 45
Close Air Support/Artillery Spotting 45
CHAPTER SEVEN — CLOSE SUPPORT OPERATIONS 46
Assets 46
Control Procedures 47
Army Air Force Employment 48
Employment of Observers/Spotters/Marine Air 51
Support from the Fast Carriers 52
Support from the Escort Carriers 53
Effectiveness 56
Problems Encountered 59
Responsiveness of CAS 59
Request Procedures 59
Communications Limitations 60
Limits of Effectiveness 60
Interference with Artillery 60
Fratricide Avoidance 61
Jointness 61
CHAPTER EIGHT — CONCLUSIONS 62
Successes 62
Failures 62
Implications for Subsequent Operations 63
Implications for Joint Operations in the Pacific 64
Lessons for Current Operations 65
Conclusions/Answers to the Research Questions 65
TABLE 1 — AIRCRAFT DESIGNATIONS 68
United States 68
Japanese 68
TABLE 2 — TASK GROUP COMPOSITION 69
TABLE 3 — ESCORT CARRIER GROUPS 70
NORTHERN FORCE 70
TABLE 4 — D-DAY STRIKE TAKE-UP/ORDNANCE 71
FIGURES 72
REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER 75
BIBLIOGRAPHY 76
Books 76
Studies 77
Periodicals 77
Government Documents 77
ABSTRACT
This study is an examination of historical data to determine the effectiveness of air power in supporting operations during the battle for Saipan during June and July 1944. The battle was fought during a critical phase of World War II, over an island whose strategic significance would become manifest during the war’s closing months. The Japanese correctly believed that losing Saipan would mean the beginning of the end for the Empire.
The study determines that the role of air power was critical in protecting the amphibious force, defeating the Japanese fleet, decimating land-based Japanese air forces, and supporting the troops on the ground. Air power at Saipan created an environment which made an American victory inevitable.
The study examines the assets available and their effectiveness in various types of air support employed at Saipan, and looks at joint air employment. It concludes that anti-air combat and airfield interdiction were highly successful, while fleet action and close air support were moderately successful. It examines factors involved and the results produced. It concludes that joint operations were conducted, but that these were operations of coexistence rather than real coordination.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am deeply grateful to all the people who have assisted me in this endeavor. In addition to the invaluable assistance of my thesis committee, I acknowledge the outstanding support of the staff of the Combined Arms Research Library at Fort Leavenworth. I also extend my sincere thanks to the staff at the Air Force Historical Research Facility at Maxwell Air Force Base for their important contributions of valuable information and their willingness to help.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AAF—United States Army Air Force
AP—armor piercing shells
BB—battleship
BLT—battalion landing team
CA—heavy cruiser
CL—light cruiser
CAS—close air support
CNO—Chief of Naval Operations
COM—commander (prefix, as in C0M5THFLT, Commander 5th Fleet)
CTF—commander, task force
CTG—commander, task group
CV—fleet or fast aircraft carrier
CVL—light carrier
CVE—escort carrier
DD—destroyer
DE—destroyer escort
Div—division (suffix)
JCS—Joint Chiefs of Staff
LC—landing craft
LCI—landing craft, infantry
LCM—landing craft, mechanized
LCVP—landing craft, vehicles and personnel
LSD—landing ship, dock
NAS—naval air station
RON—squadron (suffix, as in PATRON 6, Patrol Squadron 6)
Sc—air search radar
Sg—surface search radar
Tf—task force
TF51—Joint Expeditionary Force (VADM Richmond K. Turner, commander)
TF52—Northern Attack Force, Saipan and Tinian
TF53—Southern Attack Force, Guam
TF 51.1—floating reserve, carrying 27th Division (U.S. Army)
CHAPTER ONE — INTRODUCTION
The Statement of the Problem and Its Relevance
The research questions to be examined are as follows: How effective was the air campaign in supporting amphibious force projection operations during the Saipan campaign, and to what extent could it be considered a joint effort? In an era of increasing emphasis on joint operations, a study of how these operations were conducted (or at least attempted) during the Pacific War, or even how they were avoided, can be of great significance to military scholars today. If some lessons can be learned in this area from the greatest land, air, and naval war in history, they may be of great value in creating doctrines and operational relationships which will enable modern planners to continue to field an effective military in an increasingly austere fiscal environment. In short, the study of jointness in the past can help provide modern naval aviation and its counterparts in the sister services with the proper context to make jointness possible and successful today.
The campaign to regain the Marianas, and Saipan in particular, provides an ideal laboratory for the study of how American commanders used air power from all the services at their disposal to accomplish a very difficult mission, and it can provide an understanding of the relationships of the services to each other in the larger scheme of things. The use of joint forces was really still in its infancy during World War II, and the ways that were found then to solve the many problems which arose and to capitalize on the strengths of joint forces are still very relevant.
Secondary Questions
One secondary question is, simply asked: How was the use of the various sea and land-based air assets planned and executed in support of the amphibious operations necessary to capture the heavily defended Japanese bastion at Saipan? Admiral Chester Nimitz’s Operation FORAGER, the plan to attack and seize Saipan, Tinian, Guam, and the other islands in the archipelago, was the most ambitious campaign in size and scope attempted in the Pacific to that point. As a result it required the most assets and the most detailed and careful planning. The use of air power in that campaign, including its strengths and weaknesses, may provide powerful lessons and insights for the present, in a day when the value of air power and its ultimate ability to strategically influence the outcome of a campaign or a war are still very much in debate.
The current world military and fiscal environment makes it more critical than ever before that current strategists determine realistically what can and cannot be done with air power. A realistic look at a major historical example can be of great value. Also, the renewed emphasis on littoral warfare serves to highlight the relevance of successful past uses of air power in support of amphibious forces.
Another secondary question relates to how the conduct of the overall battle affected the air campaign. It asks: What were the needs of the forces involved on the ground and on the sea for support from the air, what were the assets available, and how were they used? Another secondary question is closely related: Was this truly a joint operation or primarily an effort by carrier-borne naval air assets? If a case can be made that it was joint, was this the result of a conscious decision by American commanders that joint air forces were the best mix to accomplish the goals of the naval and ground forces, or was it something that came about by the natural progression of the war, by temporary expediency, or by simple chance?
The answers to the several facets of this secondary question may shed much light on the machinery of the American juggernaut in the Central Pacific as it began what would have been the greatest amphibious operation in history except for Operation OVERLORD, which was being carried out halfway around the world at almost exactly the same time.
Yet another secondary question asks how the above considerations regarding assets available and their uses affected the conduct of combat operations in the campaign for Saipan, and whether they