New England Law Review: Volume 50, Number 1 - Fall 2015
()
About this ebook
The New England Law Review offers its issues in convenient digital formats for e-reader devices, apps, pads, and phones. This first issue of Volume 50 (Fall 2015) features an extensive and important Symposium entitled "Discipline, Justice, and Command in the U.S. Military," presented by leading scholars on the subject. Contents include:
"Introduction to 'Discipline, Justice, and Command in the U.S. Military: Maximizing Strengths and Minimizing Weaknesses in a Special Society,'" by Victor Hansen
"Discipline, Justice, and Command in the U.S. Military: Maximizing Strengths and Minimizing Weaknesses in a Special Society," by Rachel VanLandingham
"On Unity: A Commentary on 'Discipline, Justice, and Command in the U.S. Military: Maximizing Strengths and Minimizing Weaknesses in a Special Society,'" by Elizabeth Hillman
"To Prosecute, or Not to Prosecute: Who Should Make the Call?," by James Gallagher
In addition, Issue 1 includes these extensive student contributions:
Foreword,"50 Years: Through Changing Times the New England Law Review Remains a Constant," by Nicholas Baran
Note, "A New Era of Eyewitness Identification Law: Putting Eyewitness Testimony on Trial," by Sara Conway
Comment, "Without a Bright-line on the Green Line: How Commonwealth v. Robertson Failed to Criminalize Upskirt Photography," by Jeffrey Marvin
Quality digital formatting includes linked notes, active table of contents, active URLs in notes, and proper Bluebook citations.
New England Law Review
Journal on law and policy published by students of the New England Law School, Boston. Contributing authors including leading legal figures and scholars.
Read more from New England Law Review
New England Law Review: Volume 51, Number 1 - Winter 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 49, Number 2 - Winter 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 50, Number 3 - Spring 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 48, Number 2 - Winter 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 49, Number 4 - Summer 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 49, Number 1 - Fall 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 50, Number 2 - Winter 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 48, Number 3 - Spring 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 48, Number 4 - Summer 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 48, Number 1 - Fall 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 49, Number 3 - Spring 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to New England Law Review
Related ebooks
University of Chicago Law Review: Volume 81, Number 3 - Summer 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 50, Number 2 - Winter 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 122, Number 7 - May 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 125, Number 6 - April 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 125, Number 1 - October 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStanford Law Review: Volume 63, Issue 6 - June 2011: Symposium - the Future of Patents Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 49, Number 3 - Spring 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 122, Number 2 - November 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 124, Number 3 - December 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 123, Number 4 - January 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUniversity of Chicago Law Review: Volume 79, Number 2 - Spring 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUniversity of Chicago Law Review: Volume 81, Number 2 - Spring 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUniversity of Chicago Law Review: Symposium - Immigration Law and Institutional Design: Volume 80, Number 1 - Winter 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 48, Number 3 - Spring 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 124, Number 5 - March 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 125, Number 4 - February 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 48, Number 4 - Summer 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStanford Law Review: Volume 63, Issue 5 - May 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUniversity of Chicago Law Review: Volume 80, Number 2 - Spring 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 125, Number 7 - May 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 124, Number 2 - November 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUniversity of Chicago Law Review: Symposium - Understanding Education in the United States: Volume 79, Number 1 - Winter 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStanford Law Review: Volume 63, Issue 3 - March 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 121, Number 5 - March 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 121, Number 2 - November 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 125, Number 3 - January 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 2 - February 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOur Word Is Our Bond: How Legal Speech Acts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 125, Number 2 - November 2015 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England Law Review: Volume 48, Number 1 - Fall 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Jurisprudence For You
Law's Order: What Economics Has to Do with Law and Why It Matters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Law Journal: Volume 123, Number 7 - May 2014 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNotarial Practice & Malpractice in the Philippines: Rules, Jurisprudence, & Comments Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Argument and Program for Certainty in Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 124, Number 8 - June 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInside the Robe, A Judge's Candid Tale of Criminal Justice in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Yale Law Journal: Symposium - The Gideon Effect (Volume 122, Number 8 - June 2013) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Case of George Pell: reckoning with child sexual abuse by clergy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 5 - March 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBodies of Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLegal Literacy: An Introduction to Legal Studies Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Cicero's Orations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen the State Kills: Capital Punishment and the American Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Backlash: Libel, Impeachment, and Populism in the Reign of Queen Anne Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCourts and Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUniversity of Chicago Law Review: Volume 80, Number 4 - Fall 2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTough Cases: Judges Tell the Stories of Some of the Hardest Decisions They’ve Ever Made Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Theory of the Trial Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 127, Number 6 - April 2014 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Stanford Law Review: Volume 64, Issue 2 - February 2012 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 131, Number 7 - May 2018 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Introduction to Legal Reasoning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHarvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 5 - March 2017 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Philosophy of Law Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Harvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 1 - November 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReligious Liberty in Crisis: Exercising Your Faith in an Age of Uncertainty Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Yale Law Journal: Volume 125, Number 8 - June 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConfident Pluralism: Surviving and Thriving through Deep Difference Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related categories
Reviews for New England Law Review
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
New England Law Review - New England Law Review
NEW ENGLAND LAW REVIEW
VOLUME 50
Fall 2015
NEW ENGLAND LAW | BOSTON
Smashwords edition. Copyright © 2015 New England School of Law. All rights reserved. This work or parts of it may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted (except as permitted by sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), by any means including voice recordings and the copying of its digital form, without the written permission of the print publisher.
Published by New England Law Review. Digitally published in ebook editions, for New England Law Review, by Quid Pro Books, at Smashwords. Available in major digital formats and at leading retailers and booksellers.
Quid Pro Books
Quid Pro, LLC
5860 Citrus Blvd., suite D-101
New Orleans, Louisiana 70123
www.quidprobooks.com
qp
Cataloging for Volume 50, Number 1:
ISBN 978-1-61027-815-7 (ePUB)
CONTENTS
NEW ENG. L. REV., Vol. 50, No. 1 (Fall 2015)
SYMPOSIUM ISSUE
DISCIPLINE, JUSTICE, AND COMMAND, IN THE U.S. MILITARY:
MAXIMIZING STRENGTHS AND MINIMIZING WEAKNESSES IN A
SPECIAL SOCIETY
FOREWORD
50 YEARS: THROUGH CHANGING TIMES THE NEW ENGLAND LAW REVIEW REMAINS A CONSTANT
Nicholas Baran
50 NEW ENG. L. REV. 1
SYMPOSIUM
INTRODUCTION TO DISCIPLINE, JUSTICE, AND COMMAND IN THE U.S. MILITARY: MAXIMIZING STRENGTHS AND MINIMIZING WEAKNESSES IN A SPECIAL SOCIETY
Victor M. Hansen
50 NEW ENG. L. REV. 13
DISCIPLINE, JUSTICE, AND COMMAND IN THE U.S. MILITARY: MAXIMIZING STRENGTHS AND MINIMIZING WEAKNESSES IN A SPECIAL SOCIETY
Rachel E. VanLandingham
50 NEW ENG. L. REV. 21
ON UNITY: A COMMENTARY ON DISCIPLINE, JUSTICE, AND COMMAND IN THE U.S. MILITARY: MAXIMIZING STRENGTHS AND MINIMIZING WEAKNESSES IN A SPECIAL SOCIETY
Elizabeth L. Hillman
50 NEW ENG. L. REV. 65
TO PROSECUTE, OR NOT TO PROSECUTE, WHO SHOULD MAKE THE CALL?
James E. Gallagher
50 NEW ENG. L. REV. 73
NOTE
A NEW ERA OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION LAW: PUTTING EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY ON TRIAL
Sara Conway
50 NEW ENG. L. REV. 81
COMMENT
WITHOUT A BRIGHT-LINE ON THE GREEN LINE: HOW COMMONWEALTH V. ROBERTSON FAILED TO CRIMINALIZE UPSKIRT PHOTOGRAPHY
Jeffrey T. Marvin
50 NEW ENG. L. REV. 119
New England Law Review (ISSN 0028-4823) is published quarterly by New England Law Review, New England Law | Boston, 154 Stuart Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02116-5616. New England Law Review maintains a Web site at http://www.NewEngLRev.com.
Individual issues of New England Law Review are available for $15.00. The annual subscription rate for domestic subscribers is $35.00 ($40.00 for foreign subscribers), payable in advance. Subscriptions are renewed automatically unless notice to the contrary is received. Address changes or other requests regarding subscriptions should be directed to the Business Managing Editor at (617) 422-7294, or by email at lawreview@nesl.edu
Back issues may be obtained from William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 1285 Main Street, Buffalo, New York 14209-1987. William S. Hein & Co., Inc. can be reached by telephone at (716) 882-2600, and by fax at (716) 883-8100. William S. Hein & Co., Inc. maintains a Web site at http://www.wshein.com. Recent issues may be obtained directly from New England Law Review. The Law Review is also available on LEXIS and WESTLAW, and individual articles from recent editions may be obtained from the Law Review’s website, On Remand, located at www.NewEngLRev.com.
The Law Review invites the submission of unsolicited manuscripts either through the mail or electronically. Directions for electronic submission are available on the Law Review’s website at http://www.nesl.edu/lawrev/submissions.cfm. Manuscripts should be sent to the attention of the Editor-in-Chief. Manuscripts submitted through the mail cannot be returned. The Law Review requests that submitting authors disclose any economic interests and affiliations that may influence the views expressed in submissions.
The citations in the Law Review conform to THE BLUEBOOK: A UNIFORM SYSTEM OF CITATION (Columbia Law Review Ass’n et al. eds., 19th ed. 2010).
Except as otherwise provided, the author of each article in this issue has granted permission for reprinting for classroom use, provided that: (1) copies are distributed at or below cost; (2) author and journal are identified; (3) proper notice of copyright is affixed to each copy; and (4) the user obtains permission to make such copies from the Law Review or the author.
New England Law Review is printed by Joe Christensen, Inc., 1540 Adams Street, Lincoln, Nebraska 68521, (800) 228-5030.
Postage is paid at Boston, Massachusetts, and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: send address changes and corrections to New England Law Review, New England School of Law, 154 Stuart Street, Boston, MA 02116-5616.
NEW ENGLAND LAW | BOSTON
FACULTY
ANNE M. ACTON, Professor of Law and Director of the Law Library, B.A., M.L.S., J.D.
GARY M. BISHOP, Professor of Law and Director of Legal Research and Writing, B.A., J.D.
ELIZABETH M. BLOOM, Associate Professor of Law and Director of the Academic Excellence Program, B.A., J.D.
DAVALENE COOPER, Professor of Law, B.A., M.A., J.D.
ROBERT A. COULTHARD, Academic Excellence Professor and Director of Bar Examination Preparation Services, B.A., J.D., LL.M.
BARBARA DORTCH-OKARA, Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
ALLISON M. DUSSIAS, Professor of Law, A.B., J.D.
TIGRAN W. ELDRED, Professor of Law, A.B., J.D.
RUSSELL ENGLER, Professor of Law and Director of Clinical Programs, B.A., J.D.
LISA R. FREUDENHEIM, Visiting Academic Excellence Professor, B.A., J.D.
LAWRENCE M. FRIEDMAN, Professor of Law, B.A., J.D., LL.M.
JUDITH G. GREENBERG, Associate Dean and Professor of Law, B.A., J.D., LL.M.
VICTOR M. HANSEN, Professor of Law, B.A., J.D., LL.M.
DINA FRANCESCA HAYNES, Professor of Law, B.A., J.D., LL.M.
WILTON B. HYMAN, Professor of Law, B.A., J.D., LL.M.
PETER J. KAROL, Associate Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
ILENE S. KLEIN, Clinical Law Professor, B.A., J.D.
LISA J. LAPLANTE, Associate Professor of Law and Director of the Center for International Law and Policy, B.A., M.Ed., J.D.
WAYNE K. LEWIS, Visiting Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
ERIC A. LUSTIG, Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Business Law, B.S., M.S., J.D., LL.M.
PETER M. MANUS, Professor of Law and Co-Director of the Center for Law and Social Responsibility, B.A., J.D.
CARYN R. MITCHELL-MUNEVAR, Clinical Law Professor, B.A., J.D.
GARY L. MONSERUD, Professor of Law, B.A., J.D., LL.M.
JOHN F. O’BRIEN, Dean and Professor of Law, B.A., J.D., LL.M.
KENT D. SCHENKEL, Professor of Law, B.A., J.D., LL.M.
DAVID M. SIEGEL, Professor of Law and Co-Director of the Center for Law and Social Responsibility, B.A., J.D.
JORDAN M. SINGER, Professor of Law, A.B., J.D.
CHARLES W. SORENSON, JR., Professor of Law, B.A., M.A., J.D.
PAUL F. TEICH, Professor of Law, A.B., J.D.
MONICA TEIXEIRA DE SOUSA, Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
J. RUSSELL VERSTEEG, Professor of Law, A.B., J.D.
ADJUNCT PROFESSORS OF LAW
ALEX AFERIAT, Lecturer on Law, B.S., J.D.
HON. GERALD ALCH, Adjunct Professor of Law, A.B., LL.B.
HON. FRANK J. BAILEY, Lecturer on Law, B.S.F.S., J.D.
DAVID BARON, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
ROBERT J. BAUM, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.S., J.D.
LAURA C. BICKEL, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
RACHEL BISCARDI, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
ERIC KEMPTON BRADFORD, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
DENNIS CALCAGNO, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
ADRIENNE E. CAMIRE, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
ERIC B. CARRIKER, Adjunct Professor of Law, A.B., J.D.
ADAM CEDERBAUM, Lecturer on Law, A.B., J.D.
JOHN F. COHAN, Lecturer on Law, B.S., J.D.
GARY S. COOPER, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.S., J.D., M.P.A.
HON. ROBERT J. CORDY, Lecturer on Law, A.B., J.D.
ANDREW P. CORNELL, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
FRANK C. CORSO, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
HON. JOHN J. CURRAN, JR., Adjunct Professor of Law, A.B., J.D.
THOMAS H. DAY, Lecturer on Law, A.B., J.D.
WILLIAM DELKER, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
WAYNE F. DENNISON, Lecturer on Law, A.B., M.P.A., J.D.
JOAN COLE DENSBERGER, Lecturer on Law, B.S., M.P.H., J.D., LL.M.
ANNE-MARIE DINIUS, Lecturer on Law, B.S., J.D.
MICHAEL JOSEPH DONOVAN, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
NADINE NASSER DONAVAN, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
MICHELE DORSEY, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
MICHAEL DUFFY, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
KRISTIN DZIALO, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
DAWN D. EFFRON, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
AMANDA EKEY, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
TYSON R. ENCE, Lecturer on Law, B.S., J.D.
R. PAUL FAXON, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
BRIAN FLAHERTY, Lecturer on Law and Reference Librarian, B.A., M.L.S.
FRANK GISO III, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
ROBERT GOLDSTEIN, Lecturer on Law, J.D., LL.M.
HON. SYDNEY HANLON, Lecturer on Law, A.B., J.D.
DIMITRY S. HERMAN, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
PATRICIA A. JONES, Adjunct Professor of Law, A.B., M.A., J.D
GLENN S. KAPLAN, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.S., J.D.
NANCY E. KAUFMAN, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
PETER KAUFMAN, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.S., M.B.A., J.D., LL.M.
JOHN KIERNAN, Adjunct Professor of Law, A.B., J.D.
VINCENT LAU, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D., M.A.
HON. MARK E. LAWTON, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
ANDREW LELLING, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
HON. STEPHEN M. LIMON, Adjunct Professor of Law, A.B., J.D.
DAVID LONDON, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
HON. DAVID A. LOWY, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
GRETCHEN LUNDGREN, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
MAUREEN A. MACFARLANE, Lecturer on Law, B.A., M.A., M.S., J.D., M.E.L.
HON. GORDON A. MARTIN, JR., Adjunct Professor of Law, A.B., LL.B.
KRISTIN MCCARTHY, Lecturer on Law and Associate Director of the Law Library, B.A., J.D., M.L.S.
CLARE MCGORRIAN, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
ALAN R. MILLER, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.A., J.D., LL.M.
DAVID MONAHAN, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
SHEILA H. MONDSHEIN, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
HALIM MORIS, Lecturer on Law, B.S., J.D.
FRANCIS MORRISSEY, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
MATTHEW MOSCHELLA, Lecturer on Law, B.A., M.S.W., J.D.
WENDY J. MURPHY, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
GARETH ORSMOND, Lecturer on Law, B.A., M.M., J.D.
CINDY TK PALMQUIST, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
PETER PERRONI, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
GERALD A. PHELPS, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.S., M.S., J.D., LL.M.
HON. MICHAEL J. POMAROLE, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
JACQUELYN REDMOND, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
HON. ROBERTO RONQUILLO, JR., Adjunct Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
HON. JAMES P. ROONEY, Lecturer on Law, A.B., J.D.
DAVID RUSSMAN, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
ELIZABETH SAHATJIAN, Lecturer on Law, B.A., M.A. J.D.
FRANK J. SCHARAFFA, Adjunct Professor of Law, A.B., LL.B., LL.M.
THOMAS SHACK III, Lecturer on Law, B.A., M.B.A., J.D.
CARLA SPIVACK, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D., Ph.D.
HON. CHARLES T. SPURLOCK, Lecturer on Law, B.S., J.D.
JENNIFER SUNDERLAND, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
VINCENT M. TENTINDO, Adjunct Professor of Law, A.B., J.D.
GARY OWEN TODD, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
MARIA ELENA VIGNOLI, Lecturer on Law, B.L., M.A., LL.M.
LAUREN VITALE, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
ADRIENNE WALKER, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
HON. CHARLES E. WALKER, JR., Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
HON. RICHARD E. WELCH III, Adjunct Professor of Law, B.A., J.D.
DONNA WHITE, Lecturer on Law, A.B., J.D., LL.M.
TIMOTHY L. WILLIAMSON, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
BETH A. WOLFSON, Lecturer on Law, B.A., J.D.
LEGAL RESEARCH AND WRITING FACULTY
ANTHONY ABELN, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., M.A., J.D.
LAURA MANNION BANWORTH, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
DAVID M. BAE, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
DAVID N. BRODSKY, Instructor of Legal Writing, A.B., J.D., LL.M
ELAINE M. BUCKLEY, Adjunct Professor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
BETH PIRRO COOK, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
CURTIS B. DOOLING, II, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
GINA GOMBAR, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
TERESA M. HARKINS LA VITA, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
DOUGLAS R. HYNE, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
C. VERED JONA, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
LISA JOHNSON, Adjunct Professor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
MICHELLE R. KING, Adjunct Professor of Legal Writing, B.A., M.P.H., J.D.
LUKE H. LEGERE, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
CATHERINE LIZOTTE, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.S., J.D.
PAULA F. MANGUM, Adjunct Professor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
NANCY L. MCPHEETERS, Adjunct Professor of Legal Writing, B.S., J.D.
NOREEN A. MURPHY, Adjunct Professor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
PETER J. RIORDAN, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., M.B.A., J.D.
STEPHANIE M. SIMMONS, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
JOSEPH F. STANTON, Adjunct Professor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
HILLARY W. STEINBROOK, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
MARK D. SZAL, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
SIDRA VITALE, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.S., J.D.
DAVID W. WATERFALL, Instructor of Legal Writing, B.A., J.D.
FOREWORD
50 Years: Through Changing Times the New England Law Review Remains a Constant
NICHOLAS BARAN*
50 NEW ENG. L. REV. 1 (2015)
INTRODUCTION
As then-Massachusetts Governor John A. Volpe wrote in the inaugural issue of the Portia Law Journal, the goal of the new law review was simple: to add to laurels already achieved in the field of legal writing.
¹ Massachusetts,
he continued, is proud of its leadership in the field of legal education, and it is most gratifying to see the Portia Law School moving forward in this tradition as evidenced not only by the establishment of this law review, but by the successful achievements of many of [this] fine school’s graduates.
²
The Portia Law Journal was soon making strides in the legal community and being recognized for its excellence. This was not new for the law school—in fact it was the first institution solely dedicated to the education of women.³ Fifty years later, and after a name change in 1969,⁴ the New England Law Review continues to strive for excellence in the field of legal scholarship. As it seeks to expand its reach throughout the legal community, its members today hold true to the tradition of excellence with which the publication was founded.
I. Looking Back: A Reflection on What Was
A. Laying the Groundwork for Success and Scholarship
From the beginning, the members of the publication sought the best and the brightest contributions from the legal community. In the first issues, published in the fall of 1965 and spring of 1966, the Portia Law Journal featured contributions from United States Senator Claiborne Pell and future United States Senator (then Attorney General for Massachusetts) Edward W. Brooke.⁵ The Portia Law Journal was focused on publishing content that was timely and relevant, and its members sought to devote its pages to the discussion of important legal issues. After the United States Supreme Court decided Griswold v. Connecticut, the Portia Law Journal published an article analyzing the legal justification for the Court’s decision.⁶ But recent Supreme Court case law was not the only issue featured in the Portia Law Journal. Issue Three included an article discussing the need for law to protect clean water supplies throughout the country.⁷ The Portia Law Journal also attracted notable contributors. In particular, it published a piece from future Governor of Massachusetts, Michael Dukakis.⁸ Then a member of the Massachusetts House of Representatives, Dukakis’s piece addressed the disdain the people of the Commonwealth had for the legislature and its antiquated structure; he proposed action to reshap[e] and moderniz[e]
the legislature in the Commonwealth.⁹ Dukakis was not the only elected leader the Portia Law Journal published in Volume 3—that volume also featured an adapted speech from then-Vice President of the United States Hubert Humphrey discussing change in local government.¹⁰ From its infancy, the Portia Law Journal sought to publish authors who would go on to become agents of change in Massachusetts and the nation. The Journal was moving forward [Massachusetts’] tradition [of leadership in legal education] . . . .
¹¹ It started off strong and would continue to grow stronger in the years to come.
B. New Name—Same Purpose
In 1969, Portia Law School became New England School of Law.¹² Now the New England Law Review, the publication maintained its mission to publish articles relevant to contemporary issues, including such topics as wiretapping, the U.S. Constitution, and the relevant state and federal laws controlling government surveillance.¹³ Indeed, constitutional issues and Supreme Court cases remained a staple within the New England Law Review’s pages: from desegregation of public schools,¹⁴ and the Establishment Clause,¹⁵ to reviewing entire Supreme Court terms,¹⁶ and the right to free speech on college campuses.¹⁷
In 1974, the tenth anniversary volume of the Law Review featured the co-founder and Dean of the Delaware Law School, Alfred Avins, who offered commentary on the legal issues surrounding integration.¹⁸ Volume 10 also published an article by a Mississippi inmate.¹⁹ Louis X. Holloway’s piece took a prisoner’s view of conjugal visitation in a southern prison—and how the structure of these visits was a form of racial oppression of the African American prisoners.²⁰ This article brought these issues to light from the perspective of a man living them. In essence, this article reflected the history of the law school and its mission—to create opportunities for those who might otherwise be excluded from the larger legal discourse.²¹
Staying true to its roots in making a difference in the legal community, the New England Law Review sought to shed light on the legal issues affecting the American people. In Volume 12, this included a discussion focusing on how the lending practices of financial institutions contributed to the deterioration of urban areas in America.²² The quality of the scholarship published in the Law Review also attracted young local professionals to submit articles on relevant legal issues.²³
Into its second decade, the Law Review was publishing important work by notable public figures. In 1981, Congressman John Joseph Moakley contributed a foreword for the Law Review’s fourth issue.²⁴ This piece introduced the Law Review’s Spring Symposium, which focused on administrative agencies.²⁵ Congressman Moakley noted, the articles and notes appearing in this volume will serve a more substantive purpose than simply to entice the curiosity of legal scholars.
²⁶ Here, the Law Review was