Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Trace Amines and Neurological Disorders: Potential Mechanisms and Risk Factors
Trace Amines and Neurological Disorders: Potential Mechanisms and Risk Factors
Trace Amines and Neurological Disorders: Potential Mechanisms and Risk Factors
Ebook1,053 pages6 hours

Trace Amines and Neurological Disorders: Potential Mechanisms and Risk Factors

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Trace Amines and Neurological Disorders: Potential Mechanisms and Risk Factors explores trace amines which, under normal conditions, are present in the mammalian brain and peripheral nervous tissues at very low (nanomolar) concentrations. However, in a diverse array of human pathologies ranging from substance abuse, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, eating disorders, schizophrenia, and other neurological and neuropsychiatric diseases, the levels of trace amines are unusually high with an imbalance in their functions. Furthermore, the rapid turnover of trace amines is evidenced by their dramatic increases following treatment with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) or deletion of the MAO genes. This suggests that the concentration of trace amines may be considerably higher at neuronal synapses than predicted by steady-state measures, implicating some pathophysiological role. Therefore, understanding molecular mechanisms and developing selective agonists and antagonists for trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs) has become a good approach for treating these diseases. Although the effects of trace amines at low physiological concentrations in mammalian species have been difficult to demonstrate, they may serve to maintain the neuronal activity of other monoamine neurotransmitters by possessing postsynaptic modulatory effects, particularly dopamine and serotonin, within defined physiological limits. Such an effect of trace amines makes them ideal candidates for the development of novel therapeutics for a wide range of human disorders. This book presents up-to-date, cutting-edge, and comprehensive information on the link between trace amines and neurological disorders.

  • Focuses on recent findings on trace amines, providing insights into the functional significance, molecular mechanisms, and biological relevance of TAARS in neurological disorders
  • Edited work with chapters authored by leaders in the field from around the globe, the broadest, most expert coverage available
  • Provides cutting-edge research on trace amines-mediated signaling in vertebrate model systems
LanguageEnglish
Release dateJul 12, 2016
ISBN9780128036167
Trace Amines and Neurological Disorders: Potential Mechanisms and Risk Factors

Related to Trace Amines and Neurological Disorders

Related ebooks

Medical For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for Trace Amines and Neurological Disorders

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Trace Amines and Neurological Disorders - Tahira Farooqui

    manuscript.

    Section I

    Introduction and Description of Trace Amines and Trace Amine-Associated Receptors

    Outline

    Chapter 1 Trace Amines: An Overview

    Chapter 2 Methods of Trace Amine Analysis in Mammalian Brain

    Chapter 3 Synthesis and Neurochemistry of Trace Amines*

    Chapter 4 The Origin and Evolution of the Trace Amine-Associated Receptor Family in Vertebrates

    Chapter 5 Differential Modulation of Adrenergic Receptor Signaling by Octopamine, Tyramine, Phenylethylamine, and 3-Iodothyronamine

    Chapter 6 Effects of Trace Amines on the Dopaminergic Mesencephalic System

    Chapter 7 Trace Amine-Associated Receptors in the Cellular Immune System

    Chapter 8 Trace Amines and Their Receptors in the Control of Cellular Homeostasis

    Chapter 9 Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1 Modulation of Dopamine System

    Chapter 10 Trace Amines as Intrinsic Monoaminergic Modulators of Spinal Cord Functional Systems

    Chapter 11 Trace Amine-Associated Receptors: Ligands and Putative Role in the Central Nervous System

    Chapter 12 β-Phenylethylamine Requires the Dopamine Transporter to Release Dopamine in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Chapter 1

    Trace Amines

    An Overview

    T. Roeder,    Department of Zoology, Molecular Physiology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany

    Abstract

    Trace amines (TAs) are usually defined as monoamines that fulfill a set of criteria; they do not act as classical neurotransmitters in vertebrates, they are present in only minute amounts in the brain and they have a sympathomimetic activity. Compounds such as phenylethanolamine, octopamine, tyramine, and synephrine are typical TAs. Recent deorphanization of bioamine receptors revealed that a number of different receptors in the mammalian brain react at nanomolar concentrations to these compounds.

    Two TAs, the monoamines octopamine and tyramine, act as regular transmitters in invertebrates where they take the roles of epinephrine and norepinephrine that are absent in these organisms. The corresponding signaling systems comprising the amines and their receptors, attracted the interest of invertebrate neurobiologists as these systems combine surprising similarities with the architecture and functioning of vertebrate adrenergic systems with a highly specific receptor pharmacology, making them valid targets for specific insecticides.

    Keywords

    Octopamine; tyramine; TAAR; olfactory receptor; invertebrate

    Outline

    Introduction 3

    Trace Amine-Associated Receptors 5

    TAs in Invertebrates 6

    Conclusion 7

    References 8

    Introduction

    Biogenic amines such as epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin, or histamine act as classical neurotransmitters or neuroactive compounds in the mammalian central nervous system. They are involved in the regulation of countless behaviors and take central roles for the proper functioning of the nervous system in general. Consequently, deregulation of aminergic signaling has been associated with a great number of neurological diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, depression, and many others. Moreover, biogenic amine metabolism is central to our reward system, thus being centrally involved in almost all types of drug action and the development of addiction. Taking this importance into account, synthesis, storage, but also removal of these biogenic amines is tightly regulated in order to keep their concentrations in physiologically relevant ranges. Termination of aminergic signaling is usually achieved by the combined action of specific reuptake systems and their enzymatic degradation. A complex web of enzymatic activities is required to regulate synthesis of these bioactive amines, but it also produces intermediate products and so-called trace amines (TAs) (Fig. 1.1).¹–³

    Figure 1.1 Biosynthesis pathways that give rise to TAs. Starting with the amino acids phenylalanine and tyrosine, two enzymes, the aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) and the biopterin-dependent aromatic amino acid hydroxylases (AAAH) produce phenethylamine, tyramine (AADC), and L-3,4-diidroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA, AAAH), respectively. In invertebrates the tyrosine decarboxylase (TDC) produces tyramine from tyrosine. Moreover, the AADC also produces dopamine from L-DOPA. The phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PNMT) catalyzes a number of different reactions including the production of N-methylphenethylamine from phenethylamine. Octopamine is, on the other hand, produced by the dopamine β-monooxygenase (DBH). In invertebrates, this is achieved by the tyramine β-hydroxylase (TβH). DBH is also responsible for the synthesis of norepinephrine from dopamine. Finally, the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) converts dopamine into 3-methoxytyramine. TAs are marked by gray boxes and the enzymes that are required to produce tyramine and octopamine in invertebrates are shown in bold and italics.¹–³

    In order to elicit physiological responses in target cells, sets of highly specific receptor molecules tailored to transmit only information carried by the specific biogenic amines are utilized. This set of receptors for biogenic amines has been used extensively as targets for countless therapeutic interventions using specific receptor agonists and/or antagonists. In addition to this handful of biogenic amines that are present at high levels in the mammalian central nervous system, other amines have been described that were found only in very low concentration. Consequently, these amines have been named TAs. As already pointed out, TAs are connected to the classical aminergic transmitter substances as they are usually produced within the same network of enzymes giving rise to these compounds. The very low concentration of TAs and the lack of information about specific receptor molecules led for several decades to the assumption that TAs have no particular transmitter or hormone function in the mammalian nervous system. This situation was changed only recently with the identification of a particular class of G-protein-coupled receptors named trace amine activated receptors (TAARs).⁴ The original definition of the term TAs was very vague; usually, they are defined as monoamines that fulfill a small set of criteria: (1) they do not act as classical neurotransmitters in vertebrates; (2) they are present in only minute amounts (mostly in the nanomolar range) in the mammalian brain; and (3) they usually have a sympathomimetic activity. Compounds such as phenylethanolamine, octopamine, tyramine, tryptamine, and synephrine are typical TAs (Fig. 1.1). Despite the fact that their particular physiological role was mostly neglected, deregulation of their concentration have been linked to numerous psychotic disorders such as depression, schizophrenia, migraine, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The synthesis pathways that give rise to the different biogenic amines, as well as to the TAs listed above, are shown in Fig. 1.1.¹,² Interestingly, both, conventional biogenic amines with an unequivocal transmitter function as well as the TAs share the same synthesis network comprising of proteins with the corresponding enzymatic activities. One early explanation for the presence of TAs was that they are unavoidable byproducts of these complex synthesis pathways.

    More than 10 years ago, deorphanization of bioamine receptors revealed that a number of different receptors in the mammalian brain react at nanomolar concentrations to TAs. These receptors called trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs) revitalized the interest in studying the biology of TAs dramatically.⁴ A more detailed characterization of TAARs is found below.

    The second highly interesting area of research where TAs have been focused on is their physiological role in invertebrates. Two of these TAs, octopamine, and tyramine, act as highly potent and highly important transmitter compounds in almost all invertebrates. In these animals they take the role of the classical aminergic neuroactive compounds epinephrine and norepinephrine. As for the TAARs, the role of TAs in invertebrates will be introduced below.

    Trace Amine-Associated Receptors

    In 2001, deorphanization of G-protein-coupled receptors revealed that TAs specifically activate some receptor molecules.⁵,⁶ The first member of this family name trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1), was shown to be specifically activated by a set of TAs including phenylethanolamine (PEA) and tryptamine in the micro- to nanomolar range. TAAR1 was the founding member of a new family of GPCRs that shares significant similarities with members of the conventional biogenic amine receptor families. Apparently, the occurrence of TAARs is tightly associated with vertebrate evolution; thus this family of GPCRs is absent in invertebrates.⁷,⁸ In humans only six TAARs were found, while rodents have more than twice the number of TAAR genes in their genomes (17 in rats and 15 in mice). In fish genomes, a highly variable number of genes can be assigned to the TAAR family. While some fish species, such as some cichlids (from 12 to 44) or the pufferfish Fugu (13) have gene number very similar to those seen in rodents, others, such as the zebrafish contain more than 100 different TAAR genes.⁹ Despite the structural similarities shared by all known members of the TAAR family, more detailed analyses revealed that this group could be further divided into two or three subclasses based on their primary structures. Despite naming the entire family of proteins TAARs, most of them are insensitive towards confrontation with classical TAs. Only TAAR1 has unequivocally been shown to be sensitive to TA confrontation, responding with specific activation and a suitable physiological response.¹⁰ Research in recent years was dichotomous with regard to the TAAR family. While a modulatory role in the nervous system that controls the activities of biogenic amine receptors and transporters has been assigned to some of them (eg, TAAR1), others are obviously olfactory receptors specifically tuned to detect volatile amines.¹¹

    Nanomolar concentrations of some TAs could specifically activate TAAR1. Tyramine and PEA are the most effective, meaning that they have the potential to induce the full agonistic response at the lowest concentrations. Binding of the agonists activates the Gαs G-protein, thus leading to an increase in cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels. The major function of TAAR1 appears to be restricted to monoaminergic systems. Different aspects in these monoaminergic systems, more precisely in dopaminergic and serotonergic systems, are regulated by neurotransmission involving TAARs. Especially dopaminergic and serotonergic systems are involved, presumably via regulation of the corresponding uptake systems. These neuronal systems are tightly associated with a set of different neuronal disorders. Newly synthesized TAAR1 agonists gained substantial interest as they might have potent anxiolytic and antipsychotic effects.¹²,¹³

    As already pointed out, the second group of TAARs that are not involved in regular aminergic signaling have been identified as olfactory receptors. They are tailored to recognize volatile amines, thus complementing the comprehensive set of conventional olfactory receptors in order to generate the complete olfactory input.¹⁴ These receptors are expressed within the olfactory system utilizing its signal transduction machinery.¹⁵ The different TAARs that are part of the olfactory system recognize different amines, thus covering a complex set of volatile compounds that are relevant for the organism’s survival.¹⁶,¹⁷ The volatile amines are often components of urine or feces, thus, they give information about conspecifics or potential predators. Functionally these volatile amines with high information content often serve as phero- or kairomones.¹⁸,¹⁹ Consequently, some of these volatile amines induce attraction, while others lead to aversive reactions. It is still a matter of debate, whether the primary ligands for the founding members of this family were indeed TAs or volatile amines. Thus, it is still not clear whether the olfactory system hijacked this part of the aminergic system or if aminergic signaling used this primarily olfactory system.

    TAs in Invertebrates

    Only two TAs, the monoamines octopamine and tyramine, yielded substantial interest of neurobiologists and pharmacologists focusing on invertebrates as they take very particular roles in invertebrates. In contrast to the situation found in the mammalian brain, both amines are present at very high concentrations throughout the nervous systems of almost all invertebrates studied so far. They act as regular transmitters in these animals, where they take the roles of epinephrine and norepinephrine that are mostly absent or present in only minor amounts in invertebrates, thus representing invertebrate TAs. Since its discovery more than 60 years ago,²⁰ octopamine became a pet compound of invertebrate neurobiologists and pharmacologists. The source from which octopamine was first isolated gave it its name, the salivary glands of Octopus, where it could be found in millimolar concentrations.²⁰ Tyramine, on the other hand, functions as the biological precursor of octopamine, but has its own physiological role, independent of octopamine.³,²¹,²² Nevertheless, the problems associated with disentangling the roles of octopamine and tyramine led most researchers to focus on octopamine rather than on tyramine.²³ Despite the fact that both monoamines are TAs in the vertebrate nervous system, their naming as TAs in the context of invertebrate neurobiology is not really justified.

    Mostly, vertebrates and invertebrates use the same biogenic amines in similar functional contexts. Only the adrenergic signaling compounds make an exception to this generally applicable rule. While epinephrine and norepinephrine are the adrenergic compounds operative in vertebrates, their role is taken by octopamine and tyramine in invertebrates. Structurally, these compounds are highly related, with the major difference being that epinephrine and norepinephrine are catecholamines, while octopamine and tyramine carry only a single hydroxyl group at their phenolic ring. Despite the fact that the structures of the signaling compounds differ, adrenergic systems of vertebrates and invertebrates share a surprisingly high degree of functional and architectural similarities. Compounds are released in very similar conditions and they control or modulate very similar physiological aspects of life, which implies that the last common ancestor of vertebrates and invertebrates already had a well-defined adrenergic system that was in charge of controlling very similar aspects of life.²⁴ Apparently, either the progenitors of vertebrates or those of invertebrates switched from using epinephrine/norepinephrine to octopamine/tyramine or vice versa.

    Beside the multifarious role of octopamine and tyramine for the control of different behaviors, they are also responsible for modulation of a great variety of different peripheral organs in order to adapt their physiology to the needs of the organism in a particular situation. Octopamine is centrally involved in the control of learning and memory, but also part of the neurochemical circuitry that controls aggression.²⁵,²⁶ Moreover, this neuroactive compound is able to modulate the input of different sensory organs at different levels and it appears to take a decisive role for controlling various aspects of movement activity.²⁷–²⁹ Receptors that transmit the physiological effects of octopamine and tyramine are all G-protein-coupled, but they share no homologies with the TAAR receptor families.³⁰ In contrast, they are classical biogenic amine receptors, clustering together with vertebrate α- or β-adrenergic receptors.³¹,³² As octopamine and tyramine receptors are the only invertebrate amine receptors that have no direct counterparts in vertebrates, they attracted the interest of invertebrate neurobiologists. Octopamine receptors were specially chosen as targets for highly specific agonists.³³ Compounds with affinities in the subnanomolar range have been developed and some of them, including amitraz and chlordimeform, have been extensively used as insecticides.³⁴,³⁵

    Conclusion

    Research within the field of TAs has developed from an exotic subject into different flourishing research areas. In the invertebrate field, octopamine and tyramine, as typical TAs, developed into the most interesting amines, attracting a larger number of researchers to this field, as these monoamines function as regular transmitters, involved in regulating a plethora of behaviors and physiological processes. The situation in the vertebrate field completely changed after identification of the first TAAR in 2001. Identification of this new family of G-protein receptors has led to the emergence of two completely new fields of research: (1) the role of TAs in regulation of monoaminergic systems and (2) the activity of TAARs as highly specific odorant receptors tailored to detect volatile amines, thus representing receptors for various phero- and kairomones. These developments will be presented in depth in the different chapters of this book.

    References

    1. Pendleton RG, Gessner G, Sawyer J. Studies on lung N-methyltransferases, a pharmacological approach. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1980;313(3):263–268.

    2. Broadley KJ. The vascular effects of trace amines and amphetamines. Pharmacol Ther. 2010;125(3):363–375.

    3. Roeder T. Octopamine in invertebrates. Prog Neurobiol. 1999;59(5):533–561.

    4. Grandy DK. Trace amine-associated receptor 1-family archetype or iconoclast? Pharmacol Ther. 2007;116(3):355–390.

    5. Borowsky B, Adham N, Jones KA, et al. Trace amines: identification of a family of mammalian G protein-coupled receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(16):8966–8971.

    6. Bunzow JR, Sonders MS, Arttamangkul S, et al. Amphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, lysergic acid diethylamide, and metabolites of the catecholamine neurotransmitters are agonists of a rat trace amine receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 2001;60(6):1181–1188.

    7. Lindemann L, Ebeling M, Kratochwil NA, Bunzow JR, Grandy DK, Hoener MC. Trace amine-associated receptors form structurally and functionally distinct subfamilies of novel G protein-coupled receptors. Genomics. 2005;85(3):372–385.

    8. Lindemann L, Hoener MC. A renaissance in trace amines inspired by a novel GPCR family. Trends Pharmacol Sci.

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1