Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Unavailable
    The Enemy of Nature: The End of Capitalism or the End of the World?
    Unavailable
    The Enemy of Nature: The End of Capitalism or the End of the World?
    Unavailable
    The Enemy of Nature: The End of Capitalism or the End of the World?
    Ebook447 pages5 hours

    The Enemy of Nature: The End of Capitalism or the End of the World?

    By Joel Kovel

    3/5

    ()

    Currently unavailable

    Currently unavailable

    About this ebook

    We live in and from nature, but the way we have evolved of doing this is about to destroy us. Capitalism and its by-products - imperialism, war, neoliberal globalization, racism, poverty and the destruction of community - are all playing a part in the destruction of our ecosystem.

    Only now are we beginning to realise the depth of the crisis and the kind of transformation which will have to occur to ensure our survival. This second, thoroughly updated, edition of The Enemy of Nature speaks to this new environmental awareness. Joel Kovel argues against claims that we can achieve a better environment through the current Western 'way of being'. By suggesting a radical new way forward, a new kind of 'ecosocialism', Joel Kovel offers real hope and vision for a more sustainable future.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherZed Books
    Release dateApr 4, 2013
    ISBN9781848136595
    Unavailable
    The Enemy of Nature: The End of Capitalism or the End of the World?
    Author

    Joel Kovel

    Joel Kovel has served as a professor in Psychiatry, Anthropology, Political Science, Social Studies and Communications. He was editor of Capitalism Nature Socialism and is the author of The Enemy of Nature (Zed, 2007), Overcoming Zionism (Pluto, 2007) and Remaking Scarcity (Pluto, 2007).

    Related to The Enemy of Nature

    Related ebooks

    Public Policy For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Radical Adaptation

      Nov 20, 2019

      We are at a moment in time when more and more people are beginning to panic over what seems to be impending civilisational apocalypse. David Wallace-Wells’s book, The Uninhabitable Earth unpacks the horrific implications of climate change. Greta Thun

      7 min read

    • Article

      Toward A Shared Space

      Apr 16, 2021

      Toward A Shared Space
      3 min read

    • Article

      Adapting To Climate Change Will Take Cooperation. Gaia Vince Is Hopeful.

      Sep 2, 2022

      As the Earth warms up, large swaths of the planet will become uninhabitable. So where will the people go? How will they live? In “Nomad Century: How Climate Migration Will Reshape Our World,” Gaia Vince posits that they will migrate to northern regio

      2 min read

    • Article

      Empire The Facts

      Aug 8, 2023

      £7.5tn the estimated amount of wealth Britain extracted from African countries due to the slave trade.2 Europe’s share of global GDP went from 20% to 60% during the colonial period.3 $2.5m a year the estimated resource flow from India to Britain betw

      1 min read

    • Article

      Collaborations With Nature

      Aug 1, 2022

      Collaborations With Nature
      5 min read

    • Article

      COP26 And The Debate Africa Cannot Afford To Defer

      Dec 1, 2021

      THIS YEAR HAS brought with it a renewed sense of urgency for climate change. A host of reports released this year have indicated that the prognosis for the planet is rather grim. Last year, temperatures were around 1.02°C warmer. These extreme temper

      3 min read

    • Article

      Works In Progress

      Sep 1, 2020

      Works In Progress
      4 min read

    • Article

      How Not To Feed The World

      Aug 10, 2021

      Imagine you live by the Atlantic Ocean, close enough to hear the waves breaking. In those waters swim small fish. They are a superfood: rich in the nutrients needed by your bodies – and those of your children. But these fish are destined for the diet

      1 min read

    • Article

      Around The Web

      Jul 30, 2018

      “Digital-age movements tend to be organisationally toothless, good at barking at power but bad at forcing ultimatums or chewing through complex negotiations. When the Gezi Park occupation intensified and the Turkish government expressed an interest i

      1 min read

    • Article

      City Of Water

      May 13, 2022

      City Of Water
      16 min read

    • Article

      ‘It’s A Miracle Crop’: The Pioneers Pushing The Powers Of Seaweed

      Aug 26, 2021

      Motoring out of Montauk Harbor aboard a research vessel, Sean Barrett waves hello to a commercial fishing boat, yelling “What up, Jay! Any slipper snails in there?” It is a crisp, sunny day – the kind that brings tourists to Montauk, a small fishing

      8 min read

    • Article

      The Power of Going Local

      Jun 3, 2020

      Local. A simple concept with the potential to change the world. The antidote to consumer capitalism. The key to solving our seemingly endless ecological crises. A guiding principle to take us back home: to community, to the natural world, and to pros

      7 min read

    • Article

      A Climate Of Change

      Feb 25, 2020

      A Climate Of Change
      11 min read

    • Article

      Eyewitness Senegal

      Nov 19, 2021

      Eyewitness Senegal
      1 min read

    • Article

      Time for Food Resilience

      Aug 7, 2020

      Time for Food Resilience
      4 min read

    • Article

      Regenerative Soil Solutions

      Apr 26, 2020

      Regenerative Soil Solutions
      1 min read

    • Article

      Regenerative Growth For Our Economies

      May 7, 2021

      Farmers understand the term ‘regenerative’ very well. In agriculture, it refers to a type of farming that seeks to do no harm and actively reverse prior damage done to the environment. This means that if you practise regenerative agriculture, soil th

      2 min read

    • Article

      Re-connect

      Jul 9, 2020

      Design as an Attitude by Alice Rawsthorn Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth by R Buckminster Fuller Happy City: Transforming our Lives through Urban Design by Charles Montgomery We Should All be Feminists by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie Fashionopolis:

      1 min read

    • Article

      Make Mining Green

      Apr 16, 2022

      Make Mining Green
      4 min read

    • Article

      Climate Action Needs More Female Leaders In Asia, UN Women Specialist Says

      Mar 13, 2022

      More women are needed in top leadership and policymaking positions across the Asia-Pacific to help combat the threat posed by climate change, according to a senior United Nations representative for the region. Asia's women often work on the front lin

      3 min read

    • Article

      Flipping The Farm

      Apr 16, 2022

      Flipping The Farm
      6 min read

    • Article

      Rethinking Glyphosate

      Aug 21, 2022

      Rethinking Glyphosate
      6 min read

    Reviews for The Enemy of Nature

    3/5

    5 ratings4 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 3/5
      Bleh. His critiques are fine but he doesn't dig deep enough. His solutions don't seem feasible, and don't go far enough. A book clearly aimed at an audience of liberals rather than radicals. On the whole the author is well-intentioned, and is moving people in the right direction, and for that I respect his work. But it's not for me.
    • 4/5
      This is a hard book to read and recommend (or not recommend), so some explanation is required. If you (a) realize that the environmental crisis is really, really serious, "end of civilization" type stuff, and are wrestling with the problem of the social adjustments necessary to deal with the environmental crisis, and (b) have some background in Marxist thinking, and (c) find Marx attractive without necessarily buying everything he says, then you will like this book and should definitely read it. If you don't fulfill either (b) or (c) you are going to have problems with this book. You'll probably get bogged down somewhere after page 50, if you make it that far, and give up. I'd suggest looking at chapters 2, 7, and 9, though. I started out somewhat predisposed to give it 3 stars on the basis that the basic idea of the book is good but the rhetoric was off-putting. Then it became clear that you couldn't just breeze through this book, you had to go through paragraph by paragraph, and by the middle of the book I almost put it down. But I kept reading, and then towards the end of the book the author seems to regain his sense of mission. And if you're a Marxist: please consider this a five-star review, because the main negative in my mind is excessive reliance on Marxist rhetoric. I was a Trotskyist in my younger days so I am used to this sort of thing. I remember laughing at one of Lenin's titles, "Left Wing Communism: An Infantile Disorder," because the title itself seemed "over the top." What turned me off to Marxism was not a sudden embrace of liberal capitalism but the perception that the movement was being propelled forward by constant anger, and hoped to increase and exacerbate this anger as a way of getting things done. This anger had a debilitating effect on the movement. In the end people's anger turned on each other and so you had all these complicated divisions and nothing got done. The premise of this book is that capitalism is the enemy of nature. But here's the first problem: this is something which cannot really be "demonstrated," because it requires a paradigm shift. This is something I wish Kovel had acknowledged in a more straightforward way. Kovel talks about the Bhopal disaster. If you're really hell-bent on justifying capitalism, this event in itself is not a problem. It's bad, but it's because the people involved were corrupt, the governments' policies lax, and so forth -- not capitalism itself. What about other capitalist environmental disasters, mountain-top removal, global warming, or peak oil? Well, obviously we have a problem. Major critical reforms are necessary. But is the problem capitalism, or something else? Sure, capitalism is implicated, but isn't socialism implicated too? Did Marx actually say anything about this? Kovel rightly addresses these very questions. He is an advocate of eco-socialism, and he doesn't mean we'll worry about the environment after the revolution. It's an integral part of his platform, and he dislikes the opportunistic way of approaching this problem that says that "socialism will solve all our problems." I think that Kovel could have addressed this issue -- of paradigm change vs. reform, "proof" vs. "seeing" -- in a more straightforward way. The second problem is all the Marxist rhetoric. One of the more intriguing chapters in the book is "critique of actually existing eco-politics." He discusses ecological economics, and I've read such people as Herman Daly (Ecological Economics, with Joshua Farley) and Jack Manno (Privileged Goods). I have to say that I don't see any place where he specifically refutes something intrinsic to the position of ecological economics. As I understand it, E. E. would argue for social control of the size of the economy and distribution of goods, but allowing a free market to handle the allocation and price. So, what does Kovel think? Is this actually good enough to call eco-socialism, regardless of the what Daly et. al. say? It's not clear. So I wish Kovel had written a book for people who aren't necessarily Marxists at all.There's a problem with ecological economics as well. They are concerned to show that their ideas are not radical so as to increase its academic respectability. So they emphasize that they are keeping some aspects of the free market. They have some of the same problems as Kovel: being caught up in rhetoric (in their case academic instead of Marxist) in trying to communicate their positions.My take on this is that if you got behind the rhetoric and said, "this is what we need," that it would turn out that ecological economics and Kovel are actually pretty close together. You could make a case that it is, or is not, socialism. The case for calling it socialism is that all this government control, if actually implemented, is certainly going to look and feel like socialism, even though the free market remains. We need the "eco" part too -- government control, in and of itself, will not solve the problem, and may in fact make the situation worse. So socialism is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition of dealing with the environmental crisis.Bottom line, and this is why I am giving the book a relatively high recommendation: almost no one else is talking about this. The people who are talking about it, namely ecological economists, also have difficulty with the rhetoric (of academic rhetoric, not Marxist rhetoric). The reason for this is, I think, that this is a difficult subject and we are exploring things for which language is not yet quite adequate. So Kovel is worth reading. Thanks for writing the book.
    • 5/5
      Joel Kovel's, Distinguished Professor of Social Studies at Bard College, who ran for Senate in 1998 with the Greens, and sought their presidential nomination in 2000. This book reflects Kovel's obvious willingness to get his hands dirty in actual politics (an uncommon quality amongst academics), the final chapters dealing with actual measures for confronting capital's eco-destructive power and paths by which transition to an "ecosocialist" society might be pursued. The central thesis of the book is that capitalism is inherently destructive of nature, or ecosystems, and that humans, not being inherently destructive of nature (pace certain trends in deep ecology) can and must find ways to live in ways that promote healthy ecosystems rather than "split" or unhealthy ones. The book is well-argued and wide-ranging, though if you tend to be pessimistic about human nature (a category Kovel is not afraid to throw around, though with an anti-essentialist stipulation) you may not be convinced. On the question of capital being an absolute "enemy of nature", the other main claim of the book as I see it, Kovel is also persuasive, arguing that the "accumulation for its own sake" that constitutes in unavoidable core of capitalism is an inevitably anti-ecological principle. The final merit of Kovel's book I should mention is that he is not naive about the potential for green movements to drift into fascism, nor does he think that socialism will automatically be eco-socialism, holding that the "eco" needs to be intentionally pursued by leftists and progressives as a goal in its own right.
    • 3/5
      Hopefully not the last word on ecosocialism: As a socialist with relatively unfocused environmental concerns, I had long looked forward to reading Joel Kovel's 'ecosocialist manifesto' The Enemy of Nature. I had hoped that the book would help me clarify and organize my ecological thinking and its relation to socialism.Although I very much wanted to appreciate The Enemy of Nature, I was largely, though not completely, disappointed. For the most part, I found the writing overly abstract, weighed down by unnecessarily abstruse academese and excessive Marxian verbiage. I got little out of it, and feel there is little to get out of it in the first place.The Enemy of Nature is divided into three parts: "The Culprit", on capital and capitalism; "The Domination of Nature", on the relationships between capitalism and nature; and "Towards Ecosocialism", on green politics and where to go from here. Of the three, I found only the last worthwhile, in part because it had to touch on the "real world" in its discussions of current political issues, in part because Kovel was able to at least partially articulate some inspiring conclusions and visions for the future.The first part, "The Culprit", presents a pretty standard modern Marxist discussion of capital and capitalism, with emphasis on the "early Marx" and Marx's relatively few remarks on ecology and the environment. Although decent at times, these chapters include quite a bit of phrase-dropping of notions like "ecosystemic manifolds", "the prime desideratum of the capitalist" and the "First Contradiction" and "Second Contradiction of Capital" (complete with the capital letters), that did little but aggravate me.This pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo only worsens in the second part, "The Domination of Nature". Far too much of the discussion of "The Domination of Nature" is dominated by an extended, unclear, and so far as I can tell utterly irrelevant expostulation of the second law of thermodynamics, and its supposed relationships with Hobbes, "Social-Darwinism", "God", evolution, the "Gaia principle", and the meaning of life itself. All of this fully activated my bullshit detector, and I remain highly skeptical of whatever it is exactly that Kovel is arguing in this section of the book.In the end, after reading The Enemy of Nature, I remain a socialist with relatively unfocused environmental concerns. I still hope someday to find a clear, powerful, inspiring ecosocialist manifesto that will help synthesize my conceptions of socialism and ecology, but after this decidedly mixed bag, I'm far less eager to search it out.