Una investigación filosófica
By Philip Kerr
3.5/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
Londres, año 2013. Un psicópata está dejando un macabro rastro de sangre por toda la ciudad. La inspectora jefe Jakowicz, encargada de resolver el caso, descubre que el asesino se llama Wittgenstein y sus víctimas Darwin, Byron, Kant, Spinoza, Keats, Locke, Dickens, Bertrand Russell, Sócrates... Son nombres en clave, utilizados para preservar el anonimato, de personas fichadas en el Programa Lombroso, que el gobierno ha puesto en marcha en fase experimental para tener controlados a todos los ciudadanos potencialmente predispuestos a cometer crímenes violentos. Pero el individuo al que se le adjudicó el nombre de Wittgenstein resulta ser demasiado inteligente –logra infiltrarse en el sistema informático del programa y acceder a las verdaderas identidades de las personas fichadas–, estar demasiado loco –decide matar a esos potenciales asesinos en nombre del bien común– y ser demasiado lúcido –manipula y pervierte la lógica de Wittgenstein, transformándola en una lógica criminal; convierte sus asesinatos en proposiciones filosóficas; reta y provoca a la policía mediante una parodia de El asesinato considerado como una de las bellas artes de Thomas De Quincey y obliga a la inspectora Jakowicz a seguir sus reglas del juego, a cuestionarse su noción del bien y del mal, a admitir que la personalidad de un psicópata puede resultar fascinante...
Philip Kerr
Philip Kerr (Edimburgo, 1956) estudió en la Universidad de Birmingham. Sus novelas son innovadoras aproximaciones al género policíaco. En 1993 fue incluido por la revista Granta en su selección de los veinte mejores jóvenes escritores británicos de la década y en 2009 obtuvo el III Premio RBA de Novela Negra. En Anagrama ha publicado Una investigación filosófica y El infierno digital.
Related to Una investigación filosófica
Titles in the series (100)
El grito de la lechuza Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cabeza de turco Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Relatos de lo inesperado Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Un antropólogo en Marte: Siete relatos paradójicos Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5El subdesarrollo social de España: Causas y consecuencias Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTrilogía sucia de La Habana Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ese dulce mal Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Extraños en un tren Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Incendios Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lo raro es vivir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5El talento de Mr. Ripley Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Usos amorosos de la postguerra española Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Che Guevara: Una vida revolucionaria Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Abierto toda la noche Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Porno Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Crímenes imaginarios Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5La vida, el universo y todo lo demás Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5La máscara de Ripley Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Arte Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5El diario de Edith Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5De mujeres con hombres Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5El laberinto sentimental Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5El Día de La Independencia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Veo una voz Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5El sabotaje amoroso Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sábado Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5El temblor de la falsificación Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Trainspotting Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5La celda de cristal Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nubosidad variable Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related ebooks
Accidente nocturno Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Y el cielo era una bestia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEl arte de ensayar: Pensadores imprescindibles del siglo XX Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Trilogía de la Ocupación: El lugar de la estrella, La ronda nocturna, Los paseos de circunvalación Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Cosas que debes saber Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Calle de las Tiendas Oscuras Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5El muerto de Maigret: (Los casos de Maigret) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5El profeta mudo Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Viajes con Heródoto Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sábado Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5El Mago Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Los bárbaros: Ensayo sobre la mutación Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Maigret tiende una trampa: (Los casos de Maigret) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Las sabidurías de la antigüedad: Contrahistoria de la filosofía, I Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5El horizonte Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5El Gabinete de los Ocultistas Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Todo esto para qué Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5La roja insignia del valor Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Crímenes imaginarios Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sirenas en el campo de golf Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5El amigo americano Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Último día de un condenado a muerte Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEn el café de la juventud perdida Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Después de la utopía. El declive de la fe política Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLa cucaracha Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Los hermanos Sisters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Más trabajo para el enterrador Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEl Palacio del Porno Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHouellebecq economista Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/57 mejores cuentos de Villiers de L'Isle Adam Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Una investigación filosófica
169 ratings10 reviews
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Well written and generally enjoyable, particularly if you've read any Wittgenstein.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5This mystery is set in a future world where science has discovered a genetic tendency toward violent crime and where a secret database lists these individuals. Now someone is killing them. The female police inspector on the case has her own issues, but gradually tightens the net until she finds him. Parts of the book are the diary of the killer, who waxes philosophical at times. Those were the times when my interest flagged and I became impatient with the story.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Quite a refreshing read. This author is not afraid to try new things and changes around the trappings of the long established detective genre, with mixed results. We follow Jake, a protagonist we can freely call a militant lesbian since the author himself does exactly that. To my great relief this strong characterization doesn't get in the way of the plot or the story and shouldn't make anyone uncomfortable, in fact there are so many other politically incorrect situations described correctly that at some point the extreme descriptions feel quite natural and appropriate.Police Detective Jake manages to place herself at the head of an investigation into the search for a serial killer who hunts other potential killers. Written in 1992 the novel postulates what society and criminal investigation might look like in our current age. Some is spot on some not so much. Both Jake and the killer use criminal profiling in their cat and mouse game but the core method of investigation is, or should have been, philosophy. The killer is obsessed with his idol the philosopher Wittgenstein and kills other killers who's assigned nickname by the criminal database also correspond to philosophers. What should have been a battle of wits turns instead out to be a battle of wills. The author is so focused on trying to fit philosophy work in the context of crime that the entire endeavor feels forced to say the least. There is much to be enjoyed in this book and I would recommend anyone to read this if only to see the bravado of the author in breaking stereo types and trying out near future predictions. Describing this as a book thought of by Neal Stephenson and executed by William Gibson without directions doesn't feel far from the mark. If there are any gaping plot holes it would have to be things you would think the author knew something about. For example:Schizophrenia is not the same as Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD).A sociopath is not someone who suffers from schizophrenia.There are also incredibly clumsy plot holes that have nothing to do with the technical details of mental illness or philosophy. Quite early on in the novel the police bureau comes up with a good description of the killer and even has a police sketch of his face. As a final touch Jake has an elaborate recording of the killer's voice. However Jake does not instantly recognize the killer after coming in close contact and even speaking with him.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Well written and generally enjoyable, particularly if you've read any Wittgenstein.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The problem for any author who writes about the future is attaching a date to that vision. 1984, 2001, etc. Here we are in 2014 and witness that the future is much more prosaic than the book or movie. The same is true here. The year is 2013. Chief Inspector “Jake” Jacowicz has been assigned to investigate the murders of several VMN-negative men. Research has revealed that men who are deficient in Ventro Medial Nucleus are more likely to commit violent antisocial acts. The Lombroso project was created to analyze men, to find those who are VMN deficit and to provide counseling and drug treatment in order to prevent their violent natures from committing crimes. Unfortunately, one of the VMN-negative men has found his way into the database and is killing off the men.Each of the men has been given a code name to protect his privacy. The killer’s code is Ludwig Wittgenstein (obviously the title is a pun on Wittgenstein's most famous work), a twentieth century philosopher who speculated on the nature of language and its relationship to empirical reality. Oddly, the killer, in the eyes of the detectives begins to assume characteristics similar to the original philosopher whose diaries reveal interesting speculations on the nature of death and reality. Punishment in 2013 consists of punitive coma of varying lengths — often permanent. This was a way of defeating the anti-capital punishment groups. Obviously a person in a coma is not dead, they are being fed and cared for, and we know brain waves continue during coma, and its reversible nature at will (in 2013) provides control and saves money. Ironic given recent events in Oklahoma.The book is quite interesting in some of the philosophical issues it raises. The discussion of murder is particularly interesting. “Because each time I kill one of my brothers, I am, of course, killing God. But just a minute, I hear you say: if someone kills God and God does not exist, then surely he’s killing nothing at all. It makes no sense to say ‘I am killing something’ when the something does not exist. I can imagine a god that is not there, in this forest, but not kill one that is not there. And ‘to imagine a god in this forest’ means to imagine a god is there. Burt to kill a god does not mean that. . . But if someone says ‘in order for me to be able to imagine God he must after all exist in some sense’, the answer is: no, he does not have to exist in any sense. Except one. Where God does exist is in the mind of man. Ergo, one kills a man, one kills God.” Fascinating.There are other intriguing speculations on the nature of society and what is right and wrong. Society is simply a bias toward commonly held standards of what constitutes right and wrong. “That does not give us the truth about my acts. Only the appearance of truth. For thousands of years, when a man took another man's property it was called theft. But for almost a century, in certain parts of this world this sort of thing was legitimized by the name of Marxism. Tomorrow’s political philosophy might sanction murder, just as Marxism once sanctioned theft.You talk about a standard of a decent society. . .. But what kind of society is it that regards a President of the United States who orders the use of nuclear weapons to kill thousands of people as a great man, and another man who assassinates a single President as a criminal?”Very good detective story that speculates on numerous important issues, but he would have been better advised to leave the year ambiguous..
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This is the third book that Bill MacDonald recommended in his note to me a couple of weeks ago. He's right... But, here's what he said: "This one is set a little ways into the future, about 20 years. A computer hacker in England breaks into a government file an discovers a list of persons inflicted with a rare brain disorder which identifies the individual as a potential serial killer. Imagine his shock when he discovers his name is on the list. He decides to take it upon himself to track down the others on the list and kill them. Every other chapter is written in the 1st person from his viewpoint, while the others follow the policewoman's investigation of the murders. It's an excellent read."
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I read this book 15 years too late. It would have been much better then when technology wasn't as advanced as now. Reading it now is spoiled by badly dated technological descriptions.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Back in the 1990s Philip Kerr was often heralded as "the British Michael Crichton" because of his chilling portrayals of the near future. I can't see this myself. His foray in to the past with the series of books featuring Bernie Gunther and set during, during and slightly after the Second World War has been very successful, as was his novel set in President Kennedy's America. his futuristic books just don't work - for some reason his normally sound plotting just falls apart, as does his capacity to conjure empathetic characters.This book could have been so good - the setting is certainly well captured, and his descriptions of the conflicts between senior police and government ministers seemed vary plausible. Unfortunately the story became too dependent upon squalor and faux psychology. Stick to the past, Philip - it's more forgiving!
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The best of Kerr's non-Gunther novels, imo (noting that I've never been able to get very far with the Isaac Newton book). A combination serial killer/science fiction/philosophical novel. The philosophical part is a bit thin, but the rest holds together reasonably well, without the disasters-through-pandering or -imitation that seem common in many of Kerr's other 90s works.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Philosophical murder mystery set slightly in the future (2013) - supposedly there is a DNA test that reveals criminal tendencies and serial killers are rampant - one in particular is killing men before they commit crimes "just in case". A female detective is assigned to catch him. The story is ok, but the long break-ins of philosophical musings really detract from it.