A Radical Philosophy of Saint Paul
By Stanislas Breton and Ward Blanton
4/5
()
About this ebook
Related to A Radical Philosophy of Saint Paul
Related ebooks
History and Presence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Philosophy of Christology: From the Bultmannians to Derrida, 1951–2002 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSecular Faith Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRecovering the Body: A Philosophical Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLABOREM EXERCENS: SPIRITUALITY OF WORK: FOR AFRICA Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInceptions: Literary Beginnings and Contingencies of Form Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScars of the Spirit: The Struggle Against Inauthenticity Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Limits of Familiarity: Authorship and Romantic Readers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWords Fail: Theology, Poetry, and the Challenge of Representation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mouseiad and other Mock Epics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBergson and his Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen Women Held the Dragon's Tongue: and Other Essays in Historical Anthropology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mind's Provisions: A Critique of Cognitivism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hobbes's Behemoth: Religion and Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKant and the Possibility of Progress: From Modern Hopes to Postmodern Anxieties Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Atheism that Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Spectral Theory of Differential Operators Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Strange Words: Retelling and Reception in the Medieval Roland Textual Tradition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Common Growl: Toward a Poetics of Precarious Community Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInterrogation, intelligence and security: Controversial British Techniques Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMeaning, Truth, and Reference in Historical Representation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Anarchism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntelligent Universe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Passage West: Philosophy After the Age of the Nation State Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChimeras of Form: Modernist Internationalism Beyond Europe, 19142016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShakespeare's Medieval Craft: Remnants of the Mysteries on the London Stage Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Anthem Companion to Robert Park Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTargets of Opportunity: On the Militarization of Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Pursuing Presence of Facts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRegimens of the Mind: Boyle, Locke, and the Early Modern Cultura Animi Tradition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Christianity For You
Winning the War in Your Mind: Change Your Thinking, Change Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The 5 Love Languages: The Secret to Love that Lasts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Purpose Driven Life: What on Earth Am I Here For? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bible Recap: A One-Year Guide to Reading and Understanding the Entire Bible Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Good Girl's Guide to Great Sex: Creating a Marriage That's Both Holy and Hot Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Book of Enoch Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Your Brain's Not Broken: Strategies for Navigating Your Emotions and Life with ADHD Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Screwtape Letters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Holy Bible (World English Bible, Easy Navigation) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Don't Give the Enemy a Seat at Your Table: It's Time to Win the Battle of Your Mind... Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mere Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Lead When You're Not in Charge: Leveraging Influence When You Lack Authority Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: Follow Them and People Will Follow You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Law of Connection: Lesson 10 from The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries Updated and Expanded Edition: When to Say Yes, How to Say No To Take Control of Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Warrior of the Light: A Manual Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Story: The Bible as One Continuing Story of God and His People Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Girl, Wash Your Face: Stop Believing the Lies About Who You Are so You Can Become Who You Were Meant to Be Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I'll Start Again Monday: Break the Cycle of Unhealthy Eating Habits with Lasting Spiritual Satisfaction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries Workbook: When to Say Yes, How to Say No to Take Control of Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Uninvited: Living Loved When You Feel Less Than, Left Out, and Lonely Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Changes That Heal: Four Practical Steps to a Happier, Healthier You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Less Fret, More Faith: An 11-Week Action Plan to Overcome Anxiety Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries with Kids: How Healthy Choices Grow Healthy Children Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anxious for Nothing: Finding Calm in a Chaotic World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for A Radical Philosophy of Saint Paul
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
A Radical Philosophy of Saint Paul - Stanislas Breton
A RADICAL PHILOSOPHY OF SAINT PAUL
Insurrections: Critical Studies in Religion, Politics, and Culture
Insurrections: Critical Studies in Religion, Politics, and Culture
Slavoj Žižek, Clayton Crockett, Creston Davis, Jeffrey W. Robbins, editors
The intersection of religion, politics, and culture is one of the most discussed areas in theory today. It also has the deepest and most wide-ranging impact on the world. Insurrections: Critical Studies in Religion, Politics, and Culture will bring the tools of philosophy and critical theory to the political implications of the religious turn. The series will address a range of religious traditions and political viewpoints in the United States, Europe, and other parts of the world. Without advocating any specific religious or theological stance, the series aims nonetheless to be faithful to the radical emancipatory potential of religion.
After the Death of God, John D. Caputo and Gianni Vattimo, edited by Jeffrey W. Robbins
The Politics of Postsecular Religion: Mourning Secular Futures, Ananda Abeysekara
Nietzsche and Levinas: After the Death of a Certain God,
edited by Jill Stauffer and Bettina Bergo
Strange Wonder: The Closure of Metaphysics and the Opening of Awe, Mary-Jane Rubenstein
Religion and the Specter of the West: Sikhism, India, Postcoloniality, and the Politics of Translation, Arvind Mandair
Plasticity at the Dusk of Writing: Dialectic, Destruction, Deconstruction, Catherine Malabou
Anatheism: Returning to God After God, Richard Kearney
Rage and Time: A Psychopolitical Investigation, Peter Sloterdijk
Radical Political Theology: Religion and Politics After Liberalism, Clayton Crockett
Radical Democracy and Political Theology, Jeffrey W. Robbins
Hegel and the Infinite: Religion, Politics, and Dialectic, edited by Slavoj Žižek, Clayton Crockett, and Creston Davis
What Does a Jew Want? On Binationalism and Other Specters, Udi Aloni
WITH A CRITICAL INTRODUCTION BY WARD BLANTON
TRANSLATED BY JOSEPH N. BALLAN
Columbia University Press
New York
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS
Publishers Since 1893
New York Chichester, West Sussex
cup.columbia.edu
Copyright © Presses Universitaires de France, 1988
Introduction and translation copyright © 2011 Columbia University Press
All rights reserved
E-ISBN 978-0-231-52176-5
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Breton, Stanislas.
[Saint Paul. English]
A radical philosophy of Saint Paul / Stanislas Breton; with a critical introduction by Ward Blanton ; translated by Joseph N. Ballan.
p. cm. — (Insurrections : critical studies in religion, politics, and culture)
Originally published in French with title: Saint Paul.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-231-15104-7 (cloth : alk. paper)
ISBN 978-0-231-15105-4 (pbk. : alk. paper)
ISBN 978-0-231-52176-5 (e-book)
1. Bible. N.T. Epistles of Paul—Theology. 2. Paul, the Apostle, Saint.
I. Title. II. Series.
BS2655.52.B7413 2011
227'.06—dc22 2011012629
A Columbia University Press E-book.
CUP would be pleased to hear about your reading experience with this e-book at cup-ebook@columbia.edu.
CONTENTS
......................
Dispossessed life:
Introduction to Breton’s Paul
Ward Blanton
A RADICAL PHILOSOPHY OF SAINT PAUL
Preface
1. Biographical outline
2. hermeneutics and Allegory
3. Jesus the Christ: Faith and the law
4. The Pauline Cosmos
5. The Church According to Saint Paul
6. The Cross of Christ
NOTES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
INDEX
DISPOSSESSED LIFE
........................................
INTRODUCTION TO BRETON’S PAUL
WARD BLANTON
[It] beautifully expresses the wonder… when everything was still bathed in the light of an unsupervised [insurveillé] horizon.
—Stanislas Breton, A Radical Philosophy of Saint Paul
For it is not a question of annihilating what has been made and inscribed in the density of a past, but of establishing in us a more difficult freedom that does not let itself be fascinated with the traces of its passage.
—Stanislas Breton, The Word and the Cross
We consequently relinquish the image of a simple body that the dream of a new alchemy would disengage under the sign of critique at the end of its effort. Authentic Christianity [sic] is not behind us: it is in front of us.
—Stanislas Breton, The Word and the Cross
IRONICALLY, CONTEMPORARY CRITICAL theory’s renewed fascination with an archive of religious texts, traditions, ideas, and transformative possibilities may turn out to be one of the most significant political gestures of recent academic labor. The gesture necessarily brings with it renewed scrutiny of (otherwise) obvious or unquestioned categories like religion and the secular,
resulting in a radiating diffusion of academic, political, and social perplexity about how the destabilization of distinctions like this one relates to global prospects of justice, the political, freedom—in short, the prospects of cultural criticism and critical thought more generally. Precisely because a vibrant, modern, Western tradition of critique oriented itself (in its formal self-definitions and its empirical locations and useful tactics) on the critique of religion , the force of this critical tradition remains forever interlaced with genealogies of the religious. It is no wonder, in this respect, that the return of religion
insinuates demands into our thinking today, and this to precisely the same degree that the self-grounding transparency of critique, criticism, or critical thinking is finding within itself both obstructions and essential moments of opacity. By the same token, it is in this respect not as surprising as it might first appear that an ongoing recalibration or reorientation of notions of democratic politics, the freedom of political intervention, and the emergence of new community forms has sought to articulate itself by way of a reworked understanding of the Early Christian figure of Paul.
Still, this particular symptom of a recalibration of critique and critical theory by way of an ancient apostle must be at least minimally disconcerting. It is certain that Marx already believed that the critique of social relations was entirely wrapped up with a critique of religion, leading us to think that a latter-day transformation of the one oppositional pole might rather intimately affect the other. But why would an apostle show his face again in the mad scramble to orient for our own time the calculable functions and incalculable aspirations of critical thought? The question is one that is always near to me as a critical theorist and biblical scholar, relating as it does to larger issues about the way the modern European tradition of critical rationality was not oriented simply formally, structurally, or logically on the critique of religion, but also by those specific modes and tactics of internecine warfare inherited from ecclesiastical traditions of biblical interpretation. As Michel Foucault puts it, provocatively: Let us say that critique is historically biblical.
¹ So strikingly linked are the tactics shared by ostensibly post-Christian or secularist reason and avowedly doctrinal and religious moments of contest that a biblical scholar like Yvonne Sherwood can lament the way more recent formal or structural fiats of a religious–secular distinction (usually accompanied by the self-designation of oneself as on one side or the other of this divide) have functioned to occlude rather than to proliferate the tools, tactics, and cultural potentials readily noticeable within an otherwise premodern
tradition of cultural agonistics that we might otherwise gloss as the history of biblical interpretation.²
And while some have begun to speak in shrill denouncements about a loss of trust in the orienting power and beneficence of the religious–secular distinction, it is in light of recuperating and reinvigorating an archive of critical tactics that we could proceed along these questioning and questionable paths.³ And while there is no space here to delineate the mutual affectation of the invention of modern critical thought and modern negotiations of the figure of Paul (that is another book in its own right), we should not miss the way a great deal of what now passes under the heading of the turn to religion
may be understood as organized, in part, by high-profile discussions of Paul and figures of Paulinism within modern philosophy, critical theory, and psychoanalysis by Jacob Taubes, Alain Badiou, Giorgio Agamben, and Slavoj Žižek.⁴ Moreover, precisely because these philosophers articulate the apostle in relation to similar philosophical trajectories as Stanislas Breton, all of these readings are alternately foreshadowed, expanded, and subverted in important respects by the lifelong engagement with Paulinism by Breton.
More generally, at a moment like our own, when forms of thought, modes of life, or readily defined identity groups circumscribing the inside and outside of religion seem to be in flux, as if perplexed by an inheritance that has become too constrictive or predictable, Breton’s Radical Philosophy of Saint Paul becomes an essential interlocutor. Above all, Breton—among many other things a lifelong friend and intellectual ally in important respects of one of the great Marxist thinkers of the twentieth century, Louis Althusser—presents us with a figure of Paul, described in relation to Western philosophical, theological, and political history, that helps us to understand the fundamental paradox of recent readings of Paul: that the self-proclaimed apostle of a resurrected Christ would stand in as perhaps the best indication, the shortest pathway, to a theory of subjectivity that is avowedly materialist.⁵ If we are witnessing today a short-circuiting of distinctions between the religious
and the secular
—and how else would we understand the phenomenon of Paul returning as the great guarantor of an effort to think, to ground a contemporary philosophical materialism—then it is not merely coincidental that Paul has reappeared as a particularly forceful index of this scrambling of received codes. And this is something Breton’s Paul helps us to understand.
BRETON AS PHILOSOPHICAL READER OF PAULINISM
Breton’s reading of Paul and Paulinism is decidedly eclectic, variously philosophical, political, and theological. often deeply involved in a reworking of neo-Platonic categories, Breton loves to uncover truth by way of negation, by way of showing what truth is not.
It would perhaps not be offensive to him, therefore, to highlight what Breton’s reading of Paul isn’t in order to assist in making clear some of the things that are so stunningly significant for contemporary critical theory in his philosophical negotiation of Paulinism. It is perhaps also appropriate enough generally here to introduce Breton’s Paul by following Breton’s own model of approaching his topic—laterally—by setting up intersections or multiple modes of encounter between thoughts whose comparability may not seem obvious, prefabricated, or culturally readymade.
For starters (and by way of example), Breton knows very well that his is not an interpretive game emerging from strict historical method.⁶ When he speaks of Paul and allegory, for example, the philosopher uses two texts (from Ephesians and Hebrews respectively) which are, he fully acknowledges, not generally imagined by contemporary biblical scholars to be written by Paul himself.⁷ nevertheless, he invites, should they not preface any introduction to the allegorical method
? Paulinism stands in for a kind of effective history of the Pauline legacy, a shifting, developing, and contested or ruptured legacy that, for all these reasons, affords an archive that, for the thinker, opens up a multiplicity of territories for expansive conceptual exploration and invention. In this case, for example, Breton’s caveats about historical authorship are immediately followed by a beautiful discussion of time plunging into eternity, of the Christ of Ephesians—caught up in such a plunge of the contingently historical into the permanency of the structural—becoming the copula of the universe,
the mediating hinge between subject and predicates in a rhapsodic movement of cosmic reconciliation of (in the words of the letter to the Ephesians) the all in all.
Breton’s philosophical reading of this passage solicits thought to consider this textual Christ in philosophical modes we might have otherwise missed. of course, by wiring ancient metaphysical (and, I am quick to note, sometimes anti- or post-metaphysical) axioms into the apocalyptic and mystical world of Paulinist insurgency, metaphysics (as well as the limits of metaphysical reasoning) lights up with a strange new hue as well.
As Breton writes of the Christ of the letter to the Ephesians becoming the copula of a universal philosophical system: it is in the energy of a circuit, or loop-like construction,
of action that—once narrative time is plunged into structures of eternity—mimics… the aseity or self-sufficiency of the Absolute.
Breton is speaking here of the way Ephesians 1.9–12 imagines a teleological movement of divine intention, planning, and effective carrying through of an action to gather into God, by way of a cosmic Christ (Breton’s copula of the universe
), ta panta (all things). As is typical of him, however, here we see Breton squeezing together mystical and philosophical texts tighter still, forcing each, as it were, to bleed into the other. Compressing his religio-philosophical construction further, Breton adds the final twist: when, he tells us, religious narrative mimics ancient philosophical structure (and vice versa), readers are confronted with a play of gestures in which a teleological reading of the structure of the universe explodes to life, precisely, as a semantic order,
as if the meaning of Being,
or the structures of ontology itself, could be read in the forceful imperative of a speech performance like Let there be light!
I am unpacking this moment in Breton’s reading because it exemplifies an intensity of interpretive juxtaposition and mutual explication of intellectual traditions that characterizes Breton’s book generally. To keep up with Breton, readers must endeavor to be agile, for in forging such connections, quickly and schematically, this philosophical Paulinist takes us from statements of a Pauline disciple (say, the author of Ephesians), back into Paul (Romans), and then out again into classical Greek philosophy (Aristotle) and its mystical interpreters (Meister Eckhart), finally arriving at a subtle commentary not only on Martin Heidegger (the meaning of Being
) but also on Louis Althusser (for whom emergence into being and subjection to the performative speech act of sovereign power occur simultaneously). To think with the Pauline legacy, Breton’s reader finds, is to grapple also with ontologies and theories of power and subjection in which a being in the world emerges only in, with, and through a yes-saying to a substance best understood in terms of a performative speech act—Let there be light!
—or, as in Louis Althusser’s famous example of the policeman addressing someone in the street: You there!
When the light switches on, or when that someone turns to the authority to answer, You mean me?,
then reality starts to appear as summoned (in Althusser’s terminology, interpellated
) by the call that is itself the movement of self-reinforcing power. At Breton’s instigation, now listen to an Althusserian depiction of power’s revelatory function in the call
of ideology, this time keeping predestinarian Pauline texts in mind. In an interview with Fernando navarro, for example, Althusser says:
There is a paradox here. It is as if, when I believe in a notion… I were not the one who recognizes it and, confronted by it, could say: That’s it, there it is, and it’s true.
on the contrary, it is as if,
when I believe in an idea, it were the idea that dominated me and obliged me to recognize its existence and truth, through its presence. It is as if
—the roles having been reversed—it were the idea that interpellated me, in person, and obliged me to recognize its truth. This is how the ideas that make up an ideology impose themselves violently, abruptly, on the free consciousness
of men [sic]: by interpellating individuals in such a way that they find themselves compelled freely
to recognize that these ideas are true—compelled to constitute themselves as free
subjects
who are capable of recognizing the true wherever it is present, and of saying so, inwardly or outwardly, in the very form and content of the ideas constitutive of the ideology in question.… That is the basic mechanism that transforms individuals into subjects. Individuals are always-already subjects, that is to say, always-already-subject to an ideology [emphasis added].⁸
As Breton is pointing out so clearly, the basic circuitry of Althusser’s construal of subjects as effects of power issuing as a call to individuals is comparable to the surprising Pauline move in Ephesians or Romans 9 to imagine the individuality and qualities of individuals as effects or machinations of sovereign power. Breton’s reading allows us to feel the rhythms of Althusserian notions of ideology in Paulinist conceptions of predestination. By the same token, of course, and perhaps more surprisingly, Breton invites us to intuit a form of Pauline sovereignty and Paulinist allegory (with their respective visions of the aseity
of the divine) in Althusserian notions of ideology. Wiring all these links back into his construction of Paul, readers of Paulinist texts of predestination and mysticism are therefore led to the heart of a logic in which, as Meister Eckhart had