Ebook357 pages6 hours
Animal Rights: A Historical Anthology
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
4/5
()
About this ebook
This comprehensive and diverse anthology, the only one of its kind, illuminates the complex evolution of moral thought regarding animals and includes writings from ancient Greece to the present. Animal Rights reveals the ways in which a variety of thinkers have addressed such issues as our ethical responsibilities for the welfare of animals, whether animals have rights, and what it means to be human.
Related to Animal Rights
Related ebooks
Rain Without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Animal Minds, Animal Souls, Animal Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnimal Liberation Now: The Definitive Classic Renewed Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHumans and Other Animals: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human-Animal Interactions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Critical Terms for Animal Studies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnimal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The PETA Practical Guide to Animal Rights: Simple Acts of Kindness to Help Animals in Trouble Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The No-Nonsense Guide to Animal Rights Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnimals as Persons: Essays on the Abolition of Animal Exploitation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Animal Rights and Moral Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Animal Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLaboratory Animal Welfare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStriking at the Roots: A Practical Guide to Animal Activism: New Tactics, New Technology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ecology of Social Behavior Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFor the Prevention of Cruelty: The History and Legacy of Animal Rights Activism in the United States Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Vivisection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnimal Impact: Secrets Proven to Achieve Results and Move the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStriking at the Roots: A Practical Guide to Animal Activism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Through a Vegan Studies Lens: Textual Ethics and Lived Activism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnimals Property & The Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Animal Subjects: An Ethical Reader in a Posthuman World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnimal Subjects 2.0 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond Speciesism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntervention or Protest: Acting for Nonhuman Animals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBarking in the Wind: Conflict with Human Apathy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDominion: The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Urgent! Save Our Ocean to Survive Climate Change Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExperiencing Animal Minds: An Anthology of Human-Animal Encounters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The City of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Tao Te Ching: Six Translations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mindfulness in Plain English: 20th Anniversary Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Allegory of the Cave Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Quest for Cosmic Justice Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No Man Is an Island Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Animal Rights
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
4/5
1 rating1 review
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5"There is no impersonal reason for regarding the interests of human beings as more important than those of animals. We can destroy animals more easily than they can destroy us; that is the only solid basis of our claim to superiority. We value art and science and literature, because these are things in which we excel. But whales might value spouting, and donkeys might maintain that a good bray is more exquisite than the music of Bach. We cannot prove them wrong except by the exercise of arbitrary power. All ethical systems, in the last analysis, depend on weapons of war." Betrand Russell, "If animals could talk."
"There is no day nor hour, in which in some regions of the many-peopled globe, thousands of men, and millions of animals, are not tortured to the utmost extend that organized life will afford." William Godwin, Enquiry Concerning Political Justice
"it has been observed that those who are most forward to disallow the rights of others, and to argue that suffering and subjection are the natural lot of all living things, are usually themselves exempt from the operation of this beneficent law." Henry Salt, Animals' Rights
"Ethics are responsibility without limit towards all that lives." Albert Schweitzer, Civilisation and Ethics
WARNING: This is a cheaply produced reprint of the 1990 anthology, Political Theory and Animal Rights. Columbia UP didn't even bother to change the page headers to reflect the collection's new title...Andrew Linzey's new introduction is, because of its defensiveness, pretty weak tea. Its opponent, a caricature of animal rights theory, would not merit consideration except for its source: another Oxford academic. Linzey aims to distinguish true animal rights thinkers from false (read: violent activists), but this kind of taxonomic hairsplitting--say, between false and true Xians--has always seemed suspect to me. If Linzey wants to argue against violence in defense of others, he is welcome to do so, but it seems inapposite in the introduction to this volume. Given that the new introduction dates from 2004, he would have done better to consider the rise in "continental" treatments of the animal question, represented in this volume only by Nietzsche and Horkheimer. He would have done better, in short, to consider the assault on rights-based approaches to the animal.
Sadly, it is no surprise that the Middle Ages--and, for that matter, philosophers outside the Greek/Latin/German/French/English traditions--are barely represented at all. As is usual, it cites only Augustine and Aquinas. Only one is necessary, as Aquinas's animal theory only refines Augustine (instructors: do not shy away from the sloppiness of Aquinas's treatment of animals: note how he mangles scripture by, for example, omitting human vegetarianism in Eden, or, in his explanation that plants are for animals and animals for humans, his inability to deal with carnivorous animals). Had Linzey and Clarke consulted a medievalist, they might have provided another view of animals: perhaps Ambrose's treatment of animal morals from his Hexaemeron, Adelard of Bath's argument for the immortality of animal souls (by which he counters common ignorance, and on which point he might be linked to Leibniz on spiritual indestructability), or, better yet, something from narrative, especially given the central place of narrative in Montaigne's famous passages on animals. At the least, John of Salisbury's thoughts on hunting in Policraticus belong in the original version of this anthology!
Nonetheless, the volume is essential reading for any animals thinker. The appalling continuity of anthropocentric thought is immediately apparent. We see here arguments for indirect rights (which is roughly the same in Kant as it is in Aquinas), the denial of abstraction and thus a denial of the true capacity to die (which is the same in Schopenhauer--"indeed the brutes do not properly speaking feel death" and "between the brute and the external world there is nothing, but between us and the external world there is always our thought about it"--as it is in Heidegger), the denial of the animal ability to respond rather than merely react (which is the same in, well, you name it (Rousseau, Lacan, e.g.), as it is in Albertus Magnus and other proponents of the sensus aestimativa), the argument from human posture (for which see Ovid, William of St Thierry, inter alia, repeated by Johann Herder, and countered directly by Montaigne's citation of ostriches and camels), and the argument for the minimal suffering of animals owing to their lack of development (Shopenhauer, akin to medieval explanations of Jesus's exquisite--because divinely perfected body--suffering).
It's not all horrifying, however. Many thinkers merit praise. Had he known or remembered them, they would have mollified Derrida's dismissal of virtually the whole 'Western' philosophic tradition. While Aristotle, Hobbes, Descartes, Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, Marx, and--although he is unrepresented in this volume--Heidegger rearticulate the same positions in their own particular vocabulary, there were nevertheless a few proponents for animals in the early period apart from Montaigne and Bentham (and his particular inheritors): Hume (whose characterization of reason as a "wonderful and unintelligible instinct" certainly speaks to Derrida's confounding of Lacan's distinction between animal reaction and human response), Alexander Pope (who writes, "I know nothing more shocking or horrid, than the prospect of one of their kitchens cover'd with blood, and filled with the cries of creatures expiring in tortures. It gives one an image of a giant's den in a romance, bestrow'd with scattered heads and mangled limbs of those who were slain by his cruelty"), Kropotkin (who--happily!--argues for the superiority of sociability in evolutionary development) , and, above all, Humphry Primatt, whose eighteenth-century Dissertation of the Duty of Mercy and the Sin of Cruelty to Brute Animals might be the first sustained argument for justice towards animals since Porphyry (pace Montaigne), and whose attack on the "therefore" (animals lack, therefore...) anticipates Cora Diamond.
Book preview
Animal Rights - Columbia University Press
Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1