Unavailable
Unavailable
Unavailable
Ebook335 pages3 hours
Combative Politics: The Media and Public Perceptions of Lawmaking
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
From the Affordable Care Act to No Child Left Behind, politicians often face a puzzling problem: although most Americans support the aims and key provisions of these policies, they oppose the bills themselves. How can this be? Why does the American public so often reject policies that seem to offer them exactly what they want?
By the time a bill is pushed through Congress or ultimately defeated, we’ve often been exposed to weeks, months—even years—of media coverage that underscores the unpopular process of policymaking, and Mary Layton Atkinson argues that this leads us to reject the bill itself. Contrary to many Americans’ understandings of the policymaking process, the best answer to a complex problem is rarely self-evident, and politicians must weigh many potential options, each with merits and drawbacks. As the public awaits a resolution, the news media tend to focus not on the substance of the debate but on descriptions of partisan combat. This coverage leads the public to believe everyone in Washington has lost sight of the problem altogether and is merely pursuing policies designed for individual political gain. Politicians in turn exacerbate the problem when they focus their objections to proposed policies on the lawmaking process, claiming, for example, that a bill is being pushed through Congress with maneuvers designed to limit minority party input. These negative portrayals become linked in many people’s minds with the policy itself, leading to backlash against bills that may otherwise be seen as widely beneficial. Atkinson argues that journalists and educators can make changes to help inoculate Americans against the idea that debate always signifies dysfunction in the government. Journalists should strive to better connect information about policy provisions to the problems they are designed to ameliorate. Educators should stress that although debate sometimes serves political interests, it also offers citizens a window onto the lawmaking process that can help them evaluate the work their government is doing.
By the time a bill is pushed through Congress or ultimately defeated, we’ve often been exposed to weeks, months—even years—of media coverage that underscores the unpopular process of policymaking, and Mary Layton Atkinson argues that this leads us to reject the bill itself. Contrary to many Americans’ understandings of the policymaking process, the best answer to a complex problem is rarely self-evident, and politicians must weigh many potential options, each with merits and drawbacks. As the public awaits a resolution, the news media tend to focus not on the substance of the debate but on descriptions of partisan combat. This coverage leads the public to believe everyone in Washington has lost sight of the problem altogether and is merely pursuing policies designed for individual political gain. Politicians in turn exacerbate the problem when they focus their objections to proposed policies on the lawmaking process, claiming, for example, that a bill is being pushed through Congress with maneuvers designed to limit minority party input. These negative portrayals become linked in many people’s minds with the policy itself, leading to backlash against bills that may otherwise be seen as widely beneficial. Atkinson argues that journalists and educators can make changes to help inoculate Americans against the idea that debate always signifies dysfunction in the government. Journalists should strive to better connect information about policy provisions to the problems they are designed to ameliorate. Educators should stress that although debate sometimes serves political interests, it also offers citizens a window onto the lawmaking process that can help them evaluate the work their government is doing.
Unavailable
Related to Combative Politics
Related ebooks
Timing and Turnout: How Off-Cycle Elections Favor Organized Groups Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy Parties?: A Second Look Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Humanitarian Hypocrisy: Civilian Protection and the Design of Peace Operations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ties That Divide: Ethnic Politics, Foreign Policy, and International Conflict Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThink Tanks in America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFirepower: How the NRA Turned Gun Owners into a Political Force Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMoved to Action: Motivation, Participation, and Inequality in American Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChoices and Changes: Interest Groups in the Electoral Process Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSubsidizing Democracy: How Public Funding Changes Elections and How It Can Work in the Future Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Queer Alliances: How Power Shapes Political Movement Formation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnvy in Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLighting the Way: Federal Courts, Civil Rights, and Public Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerican Insecurity: Why Our Economic Fears Lead to Political Inaction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPatterns of Protest: Trajectories of Participation in Social Movements Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCitizen now: Engaging in politics and democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhite Backlash: Immigration, Race, and American Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhite-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJust One of the Guys?: Transgender Men and the Persistence of Gender Inequality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rushed to Judgment: Talk Radio, Persuasion, and American Political Behavior Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaking the News: Politics, the Media & Agenda Setting Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsViolent Differences: The Importance of Race in Sexual Assault against Queer Men Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Politics of the Headscarf in the United States Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitical Monopolies in American Cities: The Rise and Fall of Bosses and Reformers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBusting the Bankers' Club: Finance for the Rest of Us Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFighting for Status: Hierarchy and Conflict in World Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWinning Hearts and Votes: Social Services and the Islamist Political Advantage Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPresidents and the Politics of Agency Design: Political Insulation in the United States Government Bureaucracy, 1946-1997 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Politics of Belonging: Race, Public Opinion, and Immigration Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreedom Is a Constant Struggle: The Mississippi Civil Rights Movement and Its Legacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Politics For You
The Prince Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The January 6th Report Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ever Wonder Why?: and Other Controversial Essays Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Elite Capture: How the Powerful Took Over Identity Politics (And Everything Else) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girl with Seven Names: A North Korean Defector’s Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race: The Sunday Times Bestseller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ship of Fools: How a Selfish Ruling Class Is Bringing America to the Brink of Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Combative Politics
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings
0 ratings0 reviews