Comments on James Madden’s Essay (2017) A Thomistic Theory of Intentionality
By Razie Mah
()
About this ebook
This work comments an essay titled, “Is a Thomistic Theory of Intentionality Consistent with Physicalism?” The original author is James D. Madden. The article appears in the Winter 2017 edition of the American Catholic Quarterly (91:1-28).
Madden’s essay covers a lot of interesting territory. He defines simple and rational intent. He associates the first to weakly non-physical processes and the latter to strongly non-physical processes. He shows how this association is inconsistent with physicalism. Then, he answers objections.
This work re-articulates Madden’s essay into the format of the category-based nested form. The results complement the interscope developed in A Primer on the Individual in Community. Both simple and rational intent belong to the realm of possibility. This automatically puts them out of the reach of naive physicalism.
Despite this, specialized neural structures process simple and rational intent. The modules are adaptations into a niche. Simple and rational intent constitute two niches. Consequently, Darwinism provides an interesting twist that supports Madden’s intuition.
The comments conclude with a hypothesis on why universals are crucial for rational intentionality.
Razie Mah
See website for bio.
Read more from Razie Mah
Comments on Fr. Thomas White’s Essay (2019) "Thomism for the New Evangelization" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight’s Book (2017) Adam and the Genome Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Mansoureh Tajik’s Articles (2020) "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shi'a Islam" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer for the Category-Based Nested Form Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Father Reniero Cantalamessa’s (2016) Fourth Advent Sermon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on the Family Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Implicit and Explicit Abstraction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Boris Hennig's Essay (2008) "Substance, Reality and Distinctness" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Massimo Leone’s Article (2019) "Semiotics of Religion: A Map" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Natural Signs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Reich's Book (2018) Who We Are and How We Got Here Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeculations on Thomism and Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Peter Burfeind’s Book (2014) Gnostic America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Original Sin and Original Death: Romans 5:12-19 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James DeFrancisco’s Essay "Original Sin and Ancestral Sin" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Lacan’s (1960) Discourse to Catholics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Robert Berwick and Noam Chomsky's Book (2016) Why Only Us? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Five Views in the Book (2020) "Original Sin and the Fall" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Essay on Causality in the Empirical and Social Sciences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Clive Gamble, John Gowlett and Robin Dunbar’s Book (2014) Thinking Big Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Tyler Paytas' Essay (2019) "Divine Hiddenness as Kantian Theodicy" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Sensible and Social Construction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Matthew Minerd’s Essay (2019) "Thomism and the Formal Object of Logic" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Comments on James Madden’s Essay (2017) A Thomistic Theory of Intentionality
Related ebooks
Comments on Donna West’s Essay (2019) "Thirdness along the Intuitional Path" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Janice Breidenbach’s Essay (2018) "Action, Agency, and Substance Causation" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Daniel De Haan’s Essay (2018) "Hylomorphism and the New Mechanist Philosophy" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Richard Colledge’s Essay (2021) "Thomism and Contemporary Phenomenological Realism" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joseph Trabbic’s Essay (2021) "Jean-Luc Marion and ... First Philosophy" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on John Deely's Book (1994) New Beginnings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Lacan’s (1960) Discourse to Catholics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Christy Hemphill’s Essay (2019) "All in a Week’s Work" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on William Jaworski’s Essay (2018) "Psychology Without A Mental-Physical Dichotomy" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Christopher Austin’s Essay (2018) "A Biologically Informed Hylomorphism" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Maritain's Book (1935) Philosophy of Nature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer for the Category-Based Nested Form Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Michal Chaberek’s Essay (2019) "Classical Metaphysics and Theistic Evolution" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Robert Koons’s Essay (2018) "Hylomorphic Escalation" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeculations on Thomism and Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Daniel Novotny’s Essay (2017) Izquierdo on Universals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Giovanni Maddalena's Essay (2017) "Jung and Peirce" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Sensible and Social Construction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Marc Champagne’s Lecture (2019) "Consciousness and the Philosophy of Signs" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Boris Hennig's Essay (2008) "Substance, Reality and Distinctness" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Robert Verrill’s Essay (2017) "Elementary Particles Are Not Substances" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Ahmed Badawi’s Essay (2018) "Conflicted Rules Theory" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Egil Asprem and Ann Taves’s Essay (2018) "Explanation and the Study of Religion" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Paul Cobley's Essay (2018) "Human Understanding: A Key Triad" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on John Barrett and Krystalli Damilati’s Essay (2004) "Some Light on the Early Origins of Them All" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLessons 1-12 for Instructor’s Guide to An Archaeology of the Fall and Related Scriptures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on John Brungardt’s Post (2019) "Those Two Roads" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Mariusz Tabaczek’s Essay (2019) "What do God and Creatures Really Do in an Evolutionary Change?" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
The Little Book of Stoicism: Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Calmness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Questions for Deep Thinkers: 200+ of the Most Challenging Questions You (Probably) Never Thought to Ask Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bhagavad Gita Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Letters from a Stoic: All Three Volumes Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bhagavad Gita (in English): The Authentic English Translation for Accurate and Unbiased Understanding Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Tao Te Ching: Six Translations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5History of Western Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Allegory of the Cave Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The City of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lessons of History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Comments on James Madden’s Essay (2017) A Thomistic Theory of Intentionality
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Comments on James Madden’s Essay (2017) A Thomistic Theory of Intentionality - Razie Mah
Comments on James Madden’s Essay (2017) A Thomistic Theory of Intentionality
By Razie Mah
Published for Smashwords.com
2017
Notes on Text
This work comments on a recent essay published by James D. Madden in the Winter 2017 Edition of The American Catholic Quarterly (volume 91(1), pgs 1-28), under the title, Is a Thomistic Theory of Intentionality Consistent with Physicalism?
Of course, the short answer is no. But, on the way to that answer, Madden covers a lot of interesting territory. My goal is to re-articulate this territory, from hylomorphism to emblems, in the specialized language of the category-based nested form.
‘Words that belong together’ are denoted by single quotes or italics.
Table of Contents
Abstract 0001
Section 1.2 0016
Section 1.1 0024
Section 1.3 0027
Section 2.1 0031
Section 2.2 0039
Section 2.3 0049
Section 3.1 0092
Section 3.2 0103
Abstract
0001 In his essay, James D. Madden formulates a Thomistic theory of intentionality. He shows that this theory is both plausible and inconsistent with physicalism.
0002 What is physicalism?
First, all things are made of matter. Second, the physical nature of matter explains the workings of all things.
How simple is that?
0003 Against this simplicity stands a hylomorphic philosophy of nature. Even though all things may be made of matter, the physical nature of matter does not explain the nature of all things.
0004 What else is required?
Clearly, something not physical is required. I may