Comments on Tomas Bogardus and Mallorie Urban’s Essay (2017) How to Tell...
By Razie Mah
()
About this ebook
This work comments an essay titled, “How to Tell Whether Christians and Muslims Worship the Same God”. The authors are Tomas Bogardus and Mallorie Urban. The article appears in the Spring 2017 edition of the Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers (34:176-200).
This work is a journey. It starts by introducing the controversy surrounding a virtue-signaling Professor of Political Scientist. It examines philosophers who tried to justify the professor’s off-hand remark. Then, it begins to trek into the philosophical issues concerning names and references.
Why?
The professor’s claim raises the question: How does a name shift reference?
The authors pick up the trail of Saul Kripke, famous for arguing against descriptivism, suggesting that the doctrine ignores historical and causal factors in reference shifts. According to the category-based nested form, Kripke adds another level to a content-level containing the semantic triangle model of names and references.
Kripke runs into the problem of the continuity of historical and causal forces. Not just any chain of factors will preserve reference. So the authors turn to Gareth Evans, who proposed the idea the names acquire dossiers. These dossiers contain objects of different weighting. The dominant objects hold the greatest weight.
Evans allows us to see the true failure of descriptivism, plus the limits to Kripke’s correction. Both are incapable of articulating the idea that a name’s dossier holds objects with various weightings. Reference can change as the weightings change.
The authors then propose a test for object dominance. One question is asked to the Muslim or the Christian regarding whether the other holds the same object dominant. It goes like this. If the dossier of the “God” of the other religion turned out to be empty, could the name of their God apply to the objects within dossier of the believer’s God?
I suspect most would answer, “no”. A reference shift has occurred. A “yes” answer establishes the promise of joint sufficiency. The reference shift is not final.
So the answer depends on one’s perspective.
Yet, there is a fly in the ointment. Miroslav Volk argues the Qur’an portrays (and rejects) a heretical version of Christianity. The folk that Mohammed identifies as Christians belong to cults that have substituted false gods in for the Christian God.
This brings the re-articulation into full view. The re-articulation starts by showing how the scholastics modeled name reference. Kripke denounced a narrow version of this model, adding a situation level in order to account for historical and causal factors. He failed to alter the descriptivist model. Evans provided that alteration.
The result is a working two-level interscope, useful for modeling both the big picture of factors and the small picture of objects changing in a dossier. Borgardus and Urban arrive at a straightforward “feet of clay” conclusion.
However, with the fly in the ointment, an alternate “bird-eye’s view” conclusion presents itself. The alternate conclusion proposes an interesting research project, deciding whether references to Christians and the Bible in the Qur’an actually refer to heretical projections onto the Christian Faith as currently practiced. The reader is left pondering. If this alternate hypothesis is true, then what does that imply?
Razie Mah
See website for bio.
Read more from Razie Mah
Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on the Family Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Five Views in the Book (2020) "Original Sin and the Fall" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer for the Category-Based Nested Form Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Massimo Leone’s Article (2019) "Semiotics of Religion: A Map" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Fr. Thomas White’s Essay (2019) "Thomism for the New Evangelization" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Father Reniero Cantalamessa’s (2016) Fourth Advent Sermon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Mansoureh Tajik’s Articles (2020) "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shi'a Islam" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Natural Signs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Robert Berwick and Noam Chomsky's Book (2016) Why Only Us? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight’s Book (2017) Adam and the Genome Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Boris Hennig's Essay (2008) "Substance, Reality and Distinctness" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Peter Burfeind’s Book (2014) Gnostic America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Reich's Book (2018) Who We Are and How We Got Here Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Lacan’s (1960) Discourse to Catholics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Original Sin and Original Death: Romans 5:12-19 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Implicit and Explicit Abstraction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe First Primer on the Organization Tier Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James DeFrancisco’s Essay "Original Sin and Ancestral Sin" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James V. Schall S.J.’s (2017) Political Philosophy and Catholicism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on “A Bio-Cultural-Historical Approach to the Study of Development (2016)” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeculations on Thomism and Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Derek Bickerton's Book (2014) More than Nature Needs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Fr. Dan Pattee’s Essay (2016) Social Justice and Catholic Social Thought Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Individual In Community Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Comments on Tomas Bogardus and Mallorie Urban’s Essay (2017) How to Tell...
Related ebooks
Comments on Christy Hemphill’s Essay (2019) "All in a Week’s Work" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joseph Carroll’s Chapter (2018) "Evolutionary Literary Theory" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Egil Asprem and Ann Taves’s Essay (2018) "Explanation and the Study of Religion" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCustom and Myth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Daniel Novotny’s Essay (2017) Izquierdo on Universals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Human Niche Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCausal Theories of Reference for Proper Names Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on George Murphy's Article (2018) "The Nuts and Bolts of Creation" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCreator God, Evolving World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPutting Away Childish Things: A New Synthesis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeculations on Thomism and Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThat I May Dwell among Them: Incarnation and Atonement in the Tabernacle Narrative Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroducing Logic: A Graphic Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPart One - God, Enki, Ra/Marduk & Yahweh Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilosophy in the Elements Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philosophical, Scientific, and Historical Evidence for God: An Apologetic to the Glory of God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMerely Christianity: A Systemic Critique of Theology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMagic and Religion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on “A Bio-Cultural-Historical Approach to the Study of Development (2016)” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James DeFrancisco’s Essay "Original Sin and Ancestral Sin" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Donna West’s Essay (2019) "Thirdness along the Intuitional Path" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGodless Folly: Scientific observations that refute materialism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCreationism and the Conflict over Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFolklore and Mythology Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Comments on George Weigel’s Book (2007) Faith, Reason and the War against Jihadism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLight from Light: Cosmology and the Theology of the Logos Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLands of Likeness: For a Poetics of Contemplation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKnowing the Unknowable God: Ibn-Sina, Maimonides, Aquinas Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5What the Heavens Declare: Science in the Light of Creation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Comparative Religion For You
Paganism: An Introduction to Earth- Centered Religions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Buckland's Complete Book of Witchcraft Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5World Religions: An Indispensable Introduction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jesus, Buddha, Krishna, and Lao Tzu: The Parallel Sayings Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Secret Book of John: The Gnostic Gospels—Annotated & Explained Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A History of Religious Ideas Volume 1: From the Stone Age to the Eleusinian Mysteries Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Grimoire for the Green Witch: A Complete Book of Shadows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Inner Temple of Witchcraft: Magick, Meditation and Psychic Development Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wicca: A Guide for the Solitary Practitioner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the Gospels Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jesus: The Explosive Story of the 30 Lost Years and the Ancient Mystery Religions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Basic Guide to Eastern Orthodox Theology: Introducing Beliefs and Practices Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Seeking Allah, Finding Jesus: A Devout Muslim Encounters Christianity Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Yoga of Jesus: Understanding the Hidden Teachings of the Gospels Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Pagan Origins of the Christ Myth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mystics, Masters, Saints, and Sages: Stories of Enlightenment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Early History of God: Yahweh and the Other Deities in Ancient Israel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Person of Interest: Why Jesus Still Matters in a World that Rejects the Bible Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jesus and Buddha: The Parallel Sayings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jesus and Lao Tzu: The Parallel Sayings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Guard: Defending Your Faith with Reason and Precision Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Without Buddha I Could Not be a Christian Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quran In English. Modern English Translation. Clear and Easy to Understand. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReasoning from the Scriptures with the Jehovah's Witnesses Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Passport to Heaven: The True Story of a Zealous Mormon Missionary Who Discovers the Jesus He Never Knew Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Christianity Cults & Religions Participant Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Psychotherapy East & West Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Comments on Tomas Bogardus and Mallorie Urban’s Essay (2017) How to Tell...
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Comments on Tomas Bogardus and Mallorie Urban’s Essay (2017) How to Tell... - Razie Mah
Comments on Tomas Bogardus and Mallorie Urban’s Essay (2017) How to Tell...
By Razie Mah
Published for Smashwords.com
2017
Notes on Text
This work comments on an article published by Tomas Bogardus and Mallorie Urban in the Spring 2017 edition of Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers (volume 34(2), pages 176-200), under the title, How to Tell Whether Christians and Muslims Worship the Same God.
This article may be imaged as a journey, where one question resolves into two.
My goal is to re-articulate this pilgrimage in the specialized language of the category-based nested form. I am like a bird, accompanying two wayfarers, and eating the crumbs that they leave behind. The crumbs are food for thought.
‘Words that belong together’ are denoted by single quotes or italics.
Table of Contents
Abstract 0001
Superficial Plausibility 0005
A Better Argument from the Kripke 0022
The Core Issue 0060
Do Christians and Muslims Worship the Same God? 0082
Conclusion by a Bird of Clay 0104
Conclusion From Living Bird 0111
Abstract
0001 In How to Tell Whether Christians and Muslims Worship the Same God, Tomas Bogardus and Mallorie Urban attempt to locate the philosophical core underlying a very important question.
0002 They first dismiss several previous attempts. Then, they hybridize two modern theories of reference, generating a dossier
theory. The dossier may be viewed from either the Islamic or Christian perspective, leading to questions for each worldview. Here is the philosophical core of the same God?
issue. More