Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

DNA of the Gods: The Anunnaki Creation of Eve and the Alien Battle for Humanity
DNA of the Gods: The Anunnaki Creation of Eve and the Alien Battle for Humanity
DNA of the Gods: The Anunnaki Creation of Eve and the Alien Battle for Humanity
Ebook369 pages6 hours

DNA of the Gods: The Anunnaki Creation of Eve and the Alien Battle for Humanity

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

An in-depth study of humanity’s Anunnaki origins and the Anunnaki battle for an intelligent versus enslaved humanity

• Explains the genetic engineering of humanity by an Anunnaki scientist Ninmah

• Shows how the concepts of sin and the inferiority of women arose from Enlil’s will to keep humanity underdeveloped, clashing with Enki’s and Ninmah’s plan to make us equal in intelligence

• Reveals how humanity’s long history of conflict was shaped by the battle between Enki and his brother Enlil

Further developing the revolutionary work of Zecharia Sitchin, Chris Hardy shows that the “gods” of ancient myth, visitors from the planet Nibiru, created us using their own “divine” DNA--first through DNA extraction from their own ribs’ marrow and later by direct relations with early human females. Drawing upon multiple sacred texts, Hardy details the genetic engineering of humanity by Anunnaki scientist Ninmah, with the help of Enki and Hermes. She reveals how Ninmah’s first female human creation, Tiamat/Eve, contained more alien DNA than the earlier male one, Adamu, and how the biblical Noah represents the perfection of her work.

Examining the war between Anunnaki brothers Enki and Enlil, Hardy reveals how the concepts of sin and the inferiority of women were born out of Enlil’s attempts to enslave and then wipe out humanity, repeatedly thwarted by Enki and Ninmah. The author further explains how the sacred sexuality taught to humans--still seen in Tantric practice--became suppressed millennia later by the patriarchal concept of original sin and how innocent Eve took the blame for the expulsion from Eden and fall from Grace.

Showing that the god who created us was not the same god who expelled us from Eden, Hardy explains that there will be no apocalypse because the Good/Evil duality has never truly existed--it has been only enemy gods fighting and implicating humanity in the wake of their own competition for power. With a full psychological understanding of how the ancient “gods” have shaped humanity’s ongoing history of conflict, we can move beyond the framework of “(my) Good versus (your) Evil” imposed by Enlil and begin to steer our own planetary destiny.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateMar 21, 2014
ISBN9781591437659
DNA of the Gods: The Anunnaki Creation of Eve and the Alien Battle for Humanity
Author

Chris H. Hardy

Chris H. Hardy, Ph.D., holds a doctorate in ethno-psychology. A cognitive scientist and former researcher at Princeton’s Psychophysical Research Laboratories, she has spent many years investigating nonlocal consciousness through systems theory, chaos theory, and her own Semantic Fields Theory. The author of many research papers and published books, including DNA of the Gods and The Sacred Network, she lives in France.

Read more from Chris H. Hardy

Related to DNA of the Gods

Related ebooks

Body, Mind, & Spirit For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for DNA of the Gods

Rating: 4.1 out of 5 stars
4/5

10 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    DNA of the Gods - Chris H. Hardy

    INTRODUCTION

    Before I immersed myself in this work, I had a numinous dream . . .

    I’ve been called by the great Ra-Marduk to ascend the Eagle’s peak, where the phoenix will be reborn and will rise again.

    In this dream, I’ve been invited by Ra-Ormuzd to sit atop the Eagle’s peak and meditate there—at the place where Heaven and Earth meet and converse.

    At the moment I was called, I was coming out of a secret meeting held in a magnificent forest on a high plateau. It was a rather large meeting, because I could see several all-terrain vehicles taking people away from a manor house along a star of dirt roads. I had decided to walk and think by myself, but then the landscape was so beautiful, and my state so deep, that I felt like finding a high spot to meditate.

    I was walking through the forest toward the edge of the plateau, following a dirt path, immersed in my thoughts and yet contemplating the forest, and behold, there was a tall and thin peak, its sides covered with rare trees, towering over the valley. And there I saw the booming and numinous body and head of a magnificent gigantic Eagle, standing on the flat top of the mount—immobile, yet his eyes darting at me, calling me—an insistent and alive archetypal being. It bore a name on a giant sign: Ormuzd. The Eagle was the consciousness of the man-god.

    He was a Sitting Bird—a Bird of Wisdom, who has gathered in himself an immemorial and prophetic knowledge—standing immobile as was the ally and totem bird that I had met in the Dogon country. And yet it felt as if its wings were widely open, as if in full flight—just as the Ormuzd bird.

    And I started ascending the steep side of the peak.

    When I got to the top of the mountain, I saw that the Eagle’s huge claws were like the roots of an immense tree, running at the surface of earth before plunging into it; these roots making the whole flat summit look as if carved into being by the claws.

    Under the Sacred Eagle, on this peak-antenna guarded by Ormuzd, did I intend to meditate. And I sat there cross-legged; before me lay the large and beautiful landscape of a deep wooded valley.

    The power spot, oriented and sacred, filled with the numinous Spirit, was prodding me to reopen the memories of the olden times, when Enki/Ptah and his sons Marduk/Ra/Ahura-Mazda and Ningishzidda/Thoth were roaming on Earth, known to women and men, and choosing as wives or mates the daughters of the Adamic humanity . . . to reopen the memories of our origins, of a time when the Great Lady Ninmah—a genius Anunnaki among the Anunnaki Gods, of superior mind and understanding, and outstanding in her achievements—created the genomes of the first Earth-human couple Adamu/Adam and Tiamat/Eve.

    Clay tablets unearthed in Mesopotamia, and dating as far back as 3,500 BCE, state that for an immense time Ninmah was dedicated to the Great Work with her half-brother and consort Enki, and she had brought to life successive generations of a mixed creature by blending their own divine DNA, that of Anunnaki Gods—the ones who had come down from Heaven to Earth—with the DNA of an evolved ape-woman.

    But never were she and Enki satisfied with her creations; and at each new trial, at each new phase, she added more and more of the godly DNA to the human creature, until this creature resembled them in all points—in linguistic and learning abilities, in scientific curiosity, in behaviors, feelings, and emotional bonding . . . In all points save one: immortality.

    According to the Sumerian and Assyrian tablets, Enki, son of the King Anu, had been the first god who came down from Heaven to settle on Earth, that is, from a planetary body at the edge of the solar system, Nibiru, whose immense and thin elliptical orbit brought it cyclically in the vicinity of Earth. Enki, despite being exceedingly knowledgeable in matters of astronomy, physics, and engineering, didn’t have the biological, medical, and genetic genius his half-sister Ninmah had; and she was the one who had perfected the Earth-human race, out of the DNA of their alien race.

    The head scientist in life sciences, Ninmah had come to Earth early on with a group of young women scientists in order to oversee medical and health matters for the Anunnaki, the seeding of medicinal and health-enhancing plants (whose seeds and DNA she had brought with her), and later to adapt domesticated animals to the Earth’s environment. It’s from her work that they could jump-start agriculture and farming. She was also the one to have elaborated the Earth version of the Elixir of Immortality that the Nibirians used, specifically adapted to the Earth environment. To do so, she must have brought from Nibiru the plant (or plants) used to make it and get them to adapt to our planet—for we know it is a plant. This is one more reason that made her presence on Earth absolutely necessary early on, because the Anunnaki couldn’t keep their quasi-immortality without this plant. Some tablets state that she had also to solve the biological perturbations created by a different gravity, a widely different circadian rhythm, and other adaptation problems. As they drink a lot of wine and beer in their festivities, one can assume that she was also the one to adapt vineyards and barley on Earth.

    We know that she was not part of the first party of fifty Nibirians who landed on Earth with Enki to look for gold but that she came with the third or fourth landing.

    There are uncertainties about the beginning of this genetic engineering endeavor, aimed at creating an Earth-human species. Enki could have been the one to conceive of the plan to give a kick to intelligent evolution on Earth, and he would then have asked Ninmah to come to his abode in southeastern Africa and carry out the task. The second alternative would be that he called on Ninmah who was the woman he loved, and they both conceived of this very long-term plan. There are reasons to believe that they had already done some ad hoc experimentations (beyond the thinking and planning) before they actually got a perfect pretext to propose their plan to the Assembly of the Gods, presenting it as a way to solve their manpower problem, a problem so acute that it had led to a violent revolt of the Anunnaki working in the gold mines in Africa. A meeting of the Assembly, presided as always by Anu, the King of Heaven who reigned on the planet Nibiru, was quickly convened (Wars, 104).

    [Enki] opened his mouth and addressed the gods:

    Let her [Ninmah] create a Primitive Worker;

    And let him bear the yoke . . .

    Let the Worker carry the toil of the gods,

    Let him bear the yoke!

    Thus Ninmah, daughter of Anu, through the vote in the Assembly, got the perfecting of a mixed creature—a lulu—as a formal mission.

    Enki built (or presumably had already built) a laboratory for Ninmah in the Abzu (Africa), in Zimbabwe, above the mining center situated in South Africa. Together they studied in situ the diverse generations Ninmah created, the unsuccessful ones and then the successful ones; together they aimed at a greater perfection—they wanted a real intellectual, psychological, and bodily resemblance; they wanted human beings who could be a match for them.

    While Ninmah was working on the bioengineering process, Enki—willing to speed up the process and to add more Anunnaki genetic material to the line of the mixed creature—at least three times (as far as the tablets stipulate it clearly) made love to female earthlings of great beauty and impregnated them. One time, visiting the earthlings with his vizier in the beautiful place in the wilderness they had chosen for them, he made love to two young women on the riverside. One bore a son and the other a daughter, and the half-sister married her half-brother (as goes the Anunnaki custom). They were Adapa and Titi, the first civilized humans—a new race of earthlings able to be taught writing and science. Adapa and Titi clearly correspond to Adam and Eve insofar as the first sons they begot were called in Sumerian Ka’in and Abael, and that the first one murdered his brother and was sentenced to exile—the biblical account matching the Sumerian one.

    Adapa and Titi were a fourth leap in evolution from the first blueprint Earth-human, Adamu, who marked the first successful leap in evolution (the Homo sapiens). Ninmah worked on the second leap in evolution while improving on the genome of Adamu to create the genome of the first Earth-woman: Tiamat. Adamu and Tiamat were the Adam and Eve who resided in the garden of Eden (E.DIN, or Edin being the name of Sumer, the southeastern region sitting between the rivers Tigris and Euphrates). The biblical version, in this case, seems to have merged the two Sumerian couples to present only one. Adamu and Tiamat were indeed brought out of Africa to Sumer on the order of Enlil, half-brother of Enki and Chief of Command of Earth, legal heir of the King of Heaven, Anu.

    In the garden in the Edin, situated within Enki’s territory around the city Eridu (the first Anunnaki encampment on Earth), it’s now the turn of Ningishzidda (known to us as Hermes), a son of Enki who had been trained in Africa by Ninmah, to concoct a third evolutionary leap to Adamu’s and Tiamat’s DNAs, this time on their two living organisms. To do so, he used Ninmah’s and Enki’s respective DNA, extracted from their rib marrow. After this very controlled mutation, the couple reached self-consciousness and was able to procreate—something Ninmah and Enki had held as a long-term aim: not only did the Earth-humans have to be an intellectual and emotional match for them, but of course they had to start procreating and furthering this evolution by themselves. Afterward, the generation of Adapa and Titi (the fourth leap) will populate the Earth.

    The departure of Adamu and Tiamat toward Sumer (Edin), mostly to be shown as the great achievement they were, didn’t stop the work done in Africa. Ninmah had replicated their genomes and created seven female clones of Tiamat and seven male clones of Adamu (a clone has necessarily the sex of the original individual, being its perfect DNA replica). Fourteen goddesses, assistants of Ninmah, offered to be their carrying mothers and gave birth to them. Later, these clones were put to work in the gold mines, as had been the plan voted by the Assembly of the Gods.

    A fifth leap in evolution is achieved with Ziusudra (the biblical Noah) who will survive the Deluge. Ziusudra is the perfected Man. Just as Adapa and Titi, he is directly engendered by Enki; his mother, the Queen of Shuruppak (Ninmah’s city), was residing at Ninmah’s temple abode while the king had been lured to another city to oversee a major construction project; like all previous generations, Ziusudra was raised and trained by Ninmah herself. Enki got such a liking for him that he taught him personally diverse sciences, disclosed to him some of the Anunnaki sacred knowledge, and finally saved him from the Deluge.

    Thus Ziusudra was the fifth successful genetic mutation and yet the fourth Adamic generation or creation (because the third mutation was implemented on the living organisms). It appears clearly that the fourth-generation Ziusudra marked indeed the achievement of the Great Work, alchemical in essence, that Ninmah and Enki had relentlessly pursued from the birth of Adamu (about 300,000 years ago) up to the birth of Ziusudra in 54,000 BCE (according to Zecharia Sitchin).

    It is worth noting that the first Earth-humans—especially Adapa, Titi, and Ziusudra who had been engendered sexually by an Anunnaki making love to an earthling—had been, all of them, birthed and raised by Anunnaki goddesses and had a longevity that we would attribute to immortals. Moreover, a few humans were said to have been taken up to Heaven, either temporarily or to live forever. The result was that their life span was increased immensely (as happened to Adapa) or they became quasi-immortals like the gods (such as Ziusudra/Noah). We find accounts in the Sumerian and Akkadian tablets of such earthlings blessed with near immortality. About Adapa, the first civilized man, the tablets state that at first [Ea/Enki] has given wisdom; eternal life he had not given him.

    But later in Adapa’s life, Enki did him a great favor. Says Sitchin (12th, 154): "As the years went by, Ea decided to avert Adapa’s mortal end by providing him with a shem [a fiery stone or rocket ship] with which he was to reach the Heavenly Abode of Anu, there to partake of the Bread of Life and the Water of Life. When Adapa arrived at Anu’s Celestial Abode, Anu demanded to know who had provided Adapa with a shem with which to reach the heavenly location."

    We learn from the Epic of Gilgamesh that Utnapishtim/Ziusudra/Noah (who survived the Deluge circa 11,000 BCE) had in his possession a plant of longevity and that the King Gilgamesh, this very late descendant living around 3000–2900 BCE, will receive the secret and the plant from Utnapishtim’s own hands, even if he lost it soon after. He will also get a firsthand account of the Deluge, stating the decision of Enlil to wipe out humanity and how Enki gave him the information and helped him to build a submersible (the Ark). Utnapishtim is one of the rare mortals to have been taken along by the gods to reside with them on Nibiru (while Adapa just stayed there temporarily and then returned to Earth).

    Let’s thus keep in mind that, apart from these exceptions, the first Earth-humans who had been barred from being immortal by a collective decision of the Anunnaki had nevertheless an immense span of life.

    This is in essence the true story of our origins as Earth-humans, as evidenced by the historical data presented in the several tens of thousands of clay tablets that we have unearthed so far, but we keep discovering new libraries and their number shall only rise. For the most part, they are written in the Sumerian pictographic language, in Akkadian, in the Assyrian cuneiform language, in Babylonian, and more. Just in Nineveh (capital of the Assyrian Empire), we have discovered the library of Ashurbanipal, buried under the ruins, and unearthed there already about 31,000 clay tablets covered with Cuneiform texts. The soundness and reliability of the data—what makes them true historical data—is the fact that many books have been copied and recopied over the millennia, many have been translated in the old times word for word from the original Sumerian tablets, and the events and facts that are recounted are strikingly similar, enabling us to supply damaged lines in one tablet with the equivalent text in another. Sometimes, the scribe would notify that his text was a copy of such and such earlier text, and he would keep the main names in their Sumerian forms.

    When I first heard of similarities between events recounted in the Bible (the Book) and in the Sumerian tablets, as a trained ethnologist and researcher in comparative religions, I formed the idea that only some events—that I deemed mythological or archetypal at the time—had been the underlying fabric of religions, including the three religions of the Book (Hebrew, Christian, and Muslim).

    It’s only when I got to read the real Mesopotamian texts and the data provided by this astounding scholar who was Zecharia Sitchin, expert in biblical studies and Middle Eastern civilizations and languages, that I abruptly realized I was not reading any myths but records of past events and sound scientific accounts (see chapter 2). In the meantime, I had gotten myself into hard sciences—experimental psychology, cognitive sciences, system theory, chaos theory—and I had developed a good grasp of quantum mechanics and biology. The tablets were definitely not fuzzy and symbolic accounts. Even if the concepts developed millennia later by our science were not identical (and it was necessarily so) it was easy to recognize the DNA and genetic code when one was encountering the term Essence of Life—as in mixing the Anunnaki Essence of Life with the Essence of Life of a bipedal hominid—in order to perfect a mixed being.

    But here we have to make a digression to assess what I call historical accounts (as opposed to simple imaginative myths) and also sound scientific accounts.

    Most historians and mainstream scientists retrospectively see the start of history (as a research field and the application of a method) with Herodotus. Yet, Herodotus (fifth century BCE) seems to be only the one we chose to call the first historian. This is, in fact, a subject being debated: even if his work was definitely of a better quality, Herodotus himself had predecessors. Before historians developed a larger scrutiny of a whole region and time period, there was historical data written on tablets. In Sumer, each king or queen of a city had scribes to write all the data of his or her reign—such as accounts of wars, temples and palaces, political alliances, and exchange of letters with other rulers—using the geopolitical language of the time. Furthermore, the greatest and most ancient rulers (from the royal Anunnaki family) would also copy, and sometimes rewrite, the ancient history of their home planet and how they came down to Earth, how they created the lulus, the wars between brothers, etc. (We will see this with the example of Marduk, for one.)

    Two streams of reflection allow us to assess the issue of historical data versus myth: First, the antiquity and coherence (in cross references) of the tablets written in Sumerian and other languages, notably a whole library of more than 31,000 tablets discovered under the ruins of Nineveh. The tablets go back to the middle of the fourth millennium BCE—that is, as far as we know now, but we keep discovering tablets under the ruins of ancient Mesopotamian cities. In the tablets of the Lewis collection,*1 the historical accounts of kings’ reigns and their wars and feats go back to the Late Uruk/Jamdat Nasr period (3500–2900 BCE) and the Proto-Elamite period (ca. 3000 BCE). The unearthed tablets, in several different languages, recount the wars and feats of the rulers as well as hymns and prayers to their gods. It is precisely on the basis of the dates and data given in these tablets that historians were able to figure the history of ancient Mesopotamia and the Middle East. This is historical data by definition. The second thing to keep in mind when assessing the validity of the data is the similar key events recounted in diverse historical sources.

    Here is an example: If (a) the Babylonian historian Berossus (see here) in the third century BCE was able to give a historical account of the Deluge and the role of Ziusudra (Noah), as well as the Tower of Babel and the diversification of languages ordered by a deity; and if (b) we find very similar accounts in Sumerian, Akkadian, and Babylonian tablets, some dating to the thirty-fifth century BCE and even older; and, finally, if (c) we find similar accounts in the Bible (dated much later—according to the latest evidence, to the tenth century BCE), then it means that (1) these key events (garden of Eden, Deluge, Tower of Babel) have really happened and (2) long before the earliest parts of the Book were written; however, they have been interpreted within the semantic field of a particular culture (a people, a faith, and a time frame).

    My point in this book is to critique the diverse biases in the Book’s rendition that did or didn’t exist in the immensely earlier texts of the tablets. The two main biases in the Book being first, as Sitchin pointed out, the erasing of the family of the deity and the shift to a monotheist framework; and, second, the corrosive gender and authoritative biases.

    Indeed, in the sparkling light of new discoveries from diversified scientific fields, many experts and researchers studying ancient texts and monuments have revisited the notion of myth. Simply put, whatever contradicted the blinkered paradigmatic world-vision of nineteenth-and twentieth-century archaeology and history—a world view that had decreed the emergence of civilization on Earth in Mesopotamia 6,000 years ago—was simply branded myth. Fortunately, anthropologists and geologists, not to mention astronomers, are bringing new careful analyses based on their own sciences, shattering the ancient paradigm and forcing us to envision an alternative history—as expounded by Zecharia Sitchin, Michael Cremo, Laurence Gardner, Colin Wilson, Graham Hancock, Jim Marrs, Xaviant Haze, and many others. Laurence Gardner, for one, in Bloodline of the Holy Grail (60), clearly explains the semantic process: What actually transpired was that the original Mesopotamian writings were recorded as history. This history was later rewritten to form a base for foreign religious cults—first Judaism and then Christianity. The corrupted dogma—the new approved history—was so different from the original writings, [that] the early first-hand reports were labeled ‘mythology.’ Similarly, Jim Marrs, in Our Occulted History, notes that the ancient Greek word mythos was, during the Middle Ages, changed by the Roman Church to mean imaginative and fanciful tales veering far from any truthfulness, while it originally signified accounts or records from a people about their own past and lore. He adds, This small change in semantics has caused untold damage in current perceptions (168).

    A few examples may further illustrate our position. First, let’s remember that, before the discoveries of loads of ancient tablets written in the pictographic Sumerian language (Late Uruk period, fourth millennium BCE), the kingdom of Sumer was believed to be myth. We had already discovered Akkad and deciphered Akkadian, and still archaeologists wouldn’t give credence to the numerous carved references, within historically dated records, to a line of kings whose title was King of Sumer and Akkad.

    Second, the so-called myth of Troy: This myth collapsed in 1865 with archaeologist Frank Calvet’s discovery of the historic ruins of not only one city of Troy but nine layers of it! The city, whose siege is recounted in Homer’s Iliad, is only Troy VII, the seventh level underground, dating to the thirteenth century BCE.

    Third, according to geologist Robert Schoch, who, in 1990, worked with the renowned pioneer Egyptologist John Anthony West, the vertical erosion of the Sphinx was due to heavy and extensive rainfall that happened in the region between 10,000 and 5,000 BCE, thus dating the Sphinx’s construction to at least 7,000 to 8,000 years ago (according to Schoch’s conservative estimate). What was the reaction of conventional archaeologists? Here is one: Zahi Hawass, Director General of Giza, was asked in an interview on the PBS series NOVA if it was possible that a more ancient civilization might have built the pyramids and sculpted the Sphinx. Hawass replied: Of course it is not possible for one reason. . . . No single artifact, no single inscription, or pottery, or anything has been found until now, in any place to predate the Egyptian civilization more than 5,000 years ago.

    Yet, the huge temple complex of Göbekli Tepe, in Turkey, has been recognized in an article entitled The Birth of Religion, published in June 2011 in National Geographic, as the world’s first temple, dating to 9600 BCE. As for the Chinese pyramids complex near Beijing, scientists now estimate them to be about 12,000 years old.

    Researcher Xaviant Haze, in Aliens in Ancient Egypt (253), remarks Will the Old World Order finally crumble and allow us to write history anew, based on the fresh discoveries of the twenty-first century?

    But for now let’s get back to the tablets and what they reveal about the genetic engineering of mankind.

    It appears to have been very important for the Anunnaki (the royal ones deciding in the Assembly of the Gods) that they didn’t create a being out of nothing or out of their sole genome. They had—and that seems to have been an ethical issue—to only improve on an existing Being (the hominid), on a species born on, and out of, the very world they wanted it to be adapted to: Earth. But Ninmah and Enki—during the lengthy process—went much further than what the Assembly had given them as a mission, and they strove to generate a match to the Nibirians, to create on Earth a human species like theirs that (save for their short lives) could be a match in terms of science and civilization.

    We know that the Anunnaki came to Earth in search of metals—specifically gold so that they could sprinkle gold particles in their upper atmosphere and thus patch the holes in their ozone layer and protect their dwindling atmosphere. We also know that the pretext given to the Assembly was to create a workforce that could alleviate the load of the Anunnaki toiling in the gold mines in Africa. However, let’s bear in mind that Enki was their chief scientist, both on the original planet and on Earth. Could this scientific genius have forecast that the planet Nibiru would sooner or later lose its atmosphere and that the whole of life on Nibiru, as well as its civilization, were at stake? Could he have envisioned that the sole hope to preserve it would be to create a human species genetically adapted to the new world they had invested? Ninmah, as much as we know of her high morals and great generosity, not to speak of her astounding scientific talents, would have immediately devoted herself to the task—that is, in the event she hadn’t been

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1