The Black Biblical Heritage

The Black Biblical Heritage

Four Thousand Years Of Black Biblical History

By

Dr. John L. Johnson

© 2017 Johnson Books, Inc., and Pastor Julian Johnson

© 2016 New and revised by John L. Johnson (Johnson Books, Inc., © 2016 Twentieth-fifth printing, © 2015 Twentieth fourth printing, © 2014 Twentieth-third printing, © 2013 Twentieth-second printing, © 2011 Twentieth-first, © 2010 Twentieth printing, © 2009 Nineteenth printing, © 2008 Eighteenth printing, © 2007 Seventeenth printing, © 2005 Sixteenth printing, © 2003 Fifteenth printing, © 2002 Fourteenth printing, © 2001 Thirteenth printing, © 1999 Twelfth printing, © 1994 Eleventh printing, © 1993 Tenth printing, © 1992 Ninth printing, © 1988 Eighth printing, © 1987 Seventh printing, © 1982 Sixth printing, © 1981 Fifth printing, © 1979 Fourth printing, © 1976 Third printing, © 1975 First and Second Printing

Art Illustration by: Roger Harlan & Bill Murphy

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the publishers, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review to be printed in a newspaper or magazine.

This text will not normally comply with the new or modern translations of the Bible. For consistency, use The Jewish Bible; The Aramaic Targum Bible; The Original Geneva Bible, and the King James Bible, not the New King James Bible, published during and after 1979. It is critical to acknowledge that today’s World Bible institutions and societies, have continued to rescript old bible versions, in order to erase any evidence of an early Negro African presence. It was during the first, third, fourth, fifth, and seventeenth centuries that great efforts were made to de-Africanize the Bible, in order to invent a new European book of symbolisms, ideas and concepts. During and after 1979, new altered versions were printed to finalize the Old Euro effort to Europeanize the Bible. The modern day Church has overlooked this transformation by neglecting to compare today’s new versions with earlier Hebrew-Egypto-Ethiopic texts, and Bible glossaries. Today’s Church doesn’t have a clue to how much the new versions contradicts the old versions.

The Black Biblical Heritage was researched from old Bible versions, not new revised versions.

ISBN-13: 978-1548143770

ISBN-10: 1548143774

Printed in the United States of America

To my grandmother, Sarah Whimper whose patience and understanding helped inspire me in writing this book.

Acknowledgments

Special Thanks

I would like to express my gratitude to one of God’s Jewels, a grand lady of distinction and a great authority on Black history. I refer to none other than Mrs. Julia Davis of St. Louis, Missouri. Without God’s help and the encouragement and dynamic constructive criticisms of Mrs. Davis, I could not have achieved so much so fast.

I would also like to thank Dr. Alveda C. King, William H. Bailey, Sr., Spencer T. Banks, Denise Beck, Roderick Bell, Dr. James A. Carey, Dr. Theodore Chambers, Mandy L. Edwards, Ida M. Flanigan, Lee M. Flanigan, Caleb P. Foster, Pastor Larry D. Ingram, Roger Harlan, Doris J. Harris, Dr. Johnny James, Mother Artimese L. Johnson, Jonathan J. Johnson, Joseph B. Johnson, Pastor Julian R. Johnson, Lady Melanie Johnson, Bishop Allen Wayne Jones, PhD, Minister Andrew C. Jones, Anthony C. Jones, Hilary M. Jones, Reverend Ruben Jones, Vincent P. Love, Bishop Hollis C. Orsborn, Reverend Frank Me Phearson, Ardie C. McCoy, Sr., Bill Murphy, Jr., Minister William M. Owens, Jim L. Sims, Martha Sims, John L. Summers, Jr., Bishop Reynolds Thomas, and Dr. Andrew Wall for their encouragement toward this publication.

The Inspiring Light

About six-thousand years ago mankind's brightest light of knowledge was developed on the continent of Africa, the center set of civilization for some two-thousand years before its rays of light streamed out from its shores into the remote nations of darkness. A pearl of knowledge including medicine, science, astronomy, art, architecture, military technique, agriculture, and religion—which would bring forth writing, the alphabet and the Bible—for centuries gave birth to new civilizations such as ancient Israel, Persia, China, Greece, Rome, Scandinavia, and the British Isles. This ancient light has risen throughout the history of man from the Stone Age to Modern Civilization.

Ex Africa Semper Aliquid Novi (Out of Africa comes something always new.) The Roman historian Pliny (23-79 A.D.)

A people who lack wisdom from whence they came; possess little influence on what is to come. John L. Johnson

Table of Contents

I The Beginning

II HAM AND HIS SONS

III The Grandsons Of Ham

IV Blacks’ Interaction With Abraham

V Prior to and During the Oppression

VI The Intrusion Of Canaan

VII The Negroes of Judges and Ruth

VIII Age Of The Great Warriors

IX Diplomatic and Social Dealings Among Africa, the Canaanite Nations, and Israel

X Negro Priests, Kings, and Queens Of Israel, Judah, and Phoenicia

XI kings And Clergy Men Of Ethiopia

XII Highlights of Blacks During the First Century

XIII Absence of Africa’s Theological History

Bibliography

Index

The worth of a people is determined by how they honor God, the Bible, and their heroes.

Foreword

The Black Biblical Heritage is designed to be used in conjunction with Bible study for those who wish to learn more about the true development of Judaism and Christianity as recorded in the Bible. It is a reference tool to teach and familiarize students of the Bible with African Biblical Ancestry. This book is not a conglomerate of sources to propagandize a Black Biblical Heritage, rather it is a work whose objective is to reveal and restore the rightful lineage of Jesus of Nazareth with His original people of Africa (Ps. 80:8; John 15:1, 5; Hos. 11:1; Matt. 2:14-15).

Over the centuries, great pains have been taken to conceal and destroy the physical evidence of the Biblical Jesus, replacing Him with the one taught by Western missionaries (I Maccabees 3:48 says: "They open the book of the law, wherein the heathen (Greeks) had sought to paint the likeness of their (own) images; Job 9:24; Titus 1:12-13). Now those who once used the Bible and Christianity as instruments to exploit, enslave, and oppress nations must consider a new course.

Today, the independent Churches of Africa and the African Diaspora are moving away from the fanatical Western religious concepts of early Catholic and Protestant assemblies, and are accepting the fact that God truly did call His son out of Africa (Egypt).

The Euro translation of the Bible, especially the book of Genesis, has been greatly misrepresented by the Western Church in order to cover-up an African element or environment. The Biblical phrase: In the beginning can easily become translated Negro the beginning or Niger the first since the letter or word N, which indicates Negro (night) or Niger (Black), is actually spelled (or camouflaged) In (En), etc. The Biblical comment: darkness was upon the face of the deep can be translated Blackness or Niger was upon the face of the deep."

The Scriptural verse: Let there be light indicates that darkness existed before light (Gen. 1:1-3; Amos 5:18-20), and that light evolved out of the midst of darkness (II Cor. 4:6). The Biblical passage: Evening and morning were the first day, indicates that the very first day was dark or Niger rather than light! Following Adam’s transgression God later visited him in the cool of the day, indicating that Adam committed a sin during daylight. The Pishon (Blue Nile) and Gihon (White Nile) Rivers, which departed from the Garden of Eden were definitely linked to Negro-African nations (Gen. 2:10-14). The Hiddekel (Tigris) and Euphrates, while flowing from Africa, apparently plunged underground flowing hundreds of miles before resurfacing in the Fertile Crescent, which was not anciently known as the Middle East, but Northeast Africa; a territorial extension of Africa.

The tenth chapter of Genesis is where the most damage was contrived by the Euro translators, since it is considered to represent the racial classification of mankind. Let it be widely acknowledged that the Greek, Latin, and Anglo scholars’ intent were to translate the Bible from Hebrew Canaanite into various European languages. While going through this process, they erroneously failed to translate certain Hebrew names into a Euro interpretation.

Instead of translating the Bible to say that the sons of Ham were Ethiopia, Egypt, Libya, and Phoenicia (Palestine), the translators, who practiced preaching around the truth, chose to maintain the Hebrew identity by saying Cush, Mizraim, Phut and Canaan. This manipulation by Western translators has deceived many Bible readers to overlook Africa’s earliest impact in the Bible and natural history.

Regardless of the fact that God mentions Ethiopia during the creation (The Continent of Africa was anciently called Ethiopia (Cush and Ham), the Euro translators and today’s Western Churches have upheld God’s sacred mentioning of Ethiopia (Africa) with a deaf ear, and a blinded eye! They have selfishly refused (cloaked themselves in ignorance) to recognize that the very beginning of the book of Genesis, has an African origin.

It is reasonable to believe that a person’s heart full of truth, love, and understanding will never allow oneself to misrepresent God’s Holy Word.

Author.

Studying the past divines the future.

Know thyself.

Introduction

Before the black and cultural political revolution of the 1960s, to most African-Americans, the word Africa was repugnant and repelling; the very thought of Africa denoted savagery and ignorance. Since the cultural trans-minded formation, African-Americans’ thirst for knowledge and information about themselves and Mother Africa cannot be satiated. Cultural imports from Africa reached an all-time high. Literature, art, and sculpture were sought for homes, academic, social, and religious institution. Dress, customs of marriage, mannerisms, travel, and research about Africa have taken high priority among consumers worldwide.

It was primarily after the 60s that scholars, both European and of the African diaspora began to research and write the true African contribution to the development of man and modern civilization. Archaeological and anthropological findings gave much insight to refute Euro-Western myths concerning the darkness of the African Continent. One such archaeological finding was the dig in Ebla, Syria, a prominent ancient district that attracted Israel and other nations of that period.

The finding was a tablet written forty-five centuries ago that is said to have the most complete record of ancient civilization. Its claim revised theories on the origin of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, even making some statements in present day Bible translations obsolete, which compelled today’s Biblical scholars to credit the Old Testament with great historical accuracy (The Archives of Ebla, Doubleday).

Not only did this discovery of the tablet give light to Biblical names such as Adam, Eve, David, and Jonah, it also gave mention to a possible flood story. What does this have to do with Africa? It gives light and information on Ham, one of Noah’s sons, who is declared to be the ancestor of Africa and parts of Asia, thus dictating that their complexion was black.

This was the beginning of Africa’s contribution to Judaism and Christianity, and all religions of antiquity that are said to have their own origins in Africa. Such discoveries have raised innumerable questions concerning Blacks around the globe, since the world’s oldest Christian nation is located in Africa (Ethiopia).

A Divine-Providence, which has stirred many nations to resent the Negro, along with having an accurate Biblical account of his ante- and postdiluvian experiences with God. Such notices have certainly given rise to the Negro’s contribution to the Holy Bible; an honor which is unfortunately viewed with a deaf ear and a blind eye by many Western Churches, who have taken it on their own to erase the Negro presence in the Bible, and also his achievements from the pages of history; a bully-tactic that has all the intentions to obstruct the Negro’s vision of God, himself, and Salvation.

After the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, as knowledge began to spread of Christianity, icons, crucifixes, Madonnas, and all related Christian artifacts were done in the image of Africans. The African Saint Maurice, became the patron saint of Rome, and there were several African popes. But it was not long after the first slaves were transported from Africa by the Europeans that Pope Julius II, in 1505, commissioned the painting of certain religious works by Michelangelo (Buonarroti), and in doing so initiated the concept of God being white.

The paintings also included the portrait of Mary, mother of Christ, whose prominent black features were distorted to resemble a Florentine Italian woman. Michelangelo also applied this same misrepresentation to the Child Jesus, the three wise men, and Christ in the Last Judgement and Resurrection; eliminating all traces of their original black skin color! Not only were the images changed (like the ancient Egyptians, the Canaanites, Hebrews, Babylonians, Persians, and Chinese), but their facial features came to resemble that of Caucasian ancestry.

Nevertheless, some countries of Western Europe, namely Poland and Spain still honor a black Madonna as their protecting saint. The black Polish Madonna, Our Lady of Czestochowa, is believed to have been painted by Jesus’ disciple St. Luke, and is one of the few remaining works that depict the true features of the ancient Hebrew-black people. Even to this day, American and European missionaries have been preaching and teaching that the Africans’ black pigmentation was the result of Ham being cursed by his father Noah, and turning black.

They have preached this diabolical myth with such demonic energy and consistency that, no doubt, they have forgotten that there is nothing even similar to that recorded in the Bible (II Thess. 2:10-12), while in truth, every curse spoken of in the Bible dealing with the pigmentation of the skin has stated that the cursed ones were turned white. In fact, Miriam, Naaman, Gehazi, Uzziah, and the hand of Moses were all turned white as a result of a curse. Therefore, it is obvious that they were originally black.

May the reader be reminded that Dr. Johnson’s consistent years of researching and writing this documentary, was never inspired from a sense of color-consciousness, but rather a truth-consciousness! Emphasizing, that his objective is chiefly centered upon elevating a public awareness of the Black family structure in the Bible.

For centuries the Churches, academicians, and skeptics have intentionally misinformed the public of an African significance in the Scriptures. Many Churchgoers are expertly manipulated to believe that the Bible will lose its credibility if the name Africa, or people of color are mentioned; failing to realize that from Genesis to Revelation, if thoroughly researched, there are mountains of evidence proving an early African origin. It is absurd to refute a Negro Biblical presence, since the first Continent (and nations) mentioned in the Bible is actually today’s Edenic-Africa, which was anciently called Cush (Ethiopia) and Ham (Gen. 2:13; Ps. 105:23-27).

The prophet Moses who wrote the first five Books of the Hebrew Bible, and was himself born on the Continent of Negro-Africa, validates this account. However, long before Abraham, Moses, and the Mosaic Laws, there existed thousands of sacred scrolls delineating the African Negro as a God fearing Yahwist (Gen. 10:8-9); a very old faith, which centuries later, was borrowed by Abraham from the Negro Canaanite and Amorite Christ-like priest Melchizedec (Gen. 14:17-24; 20:10-11) and afterwards advanced by Moses (Acts 7:22; Isa. 19:21-25) and the Hebrews.

The Bible and the mainland of Africa have revealed more evidence of an African Garden of Eden than any other book and continent. DNA testing has also provided indisputable evidence that Africa, which was earlier called Cush and Ham, is the original birthplace of man. Some of the world’s most well-known clergymen are aware of this fact, but will choke with a smile before admitting this truth. It has never become popular in the Western Hemisphere to promote a Black Biblical stardom, or heroes; a belief that likely sprung from an old western saying: It doesn’t reflect good Church standards.

A Negro who lives in a Western society is constantly bullied if he raises a hairline thought of his origin in the Bible; an interest that most Western Churches have no desire for the Negro to comprehend! Unfortunately to say, of all the religions in the world, only the Western Christian Churches are hesitant to exemplify a people of color in the Bible. How sad, that many Black ministers who have vowed to defend the truth, have only looked the other way by saying: What difference does it make? (Jer. 10:21; 23:1-4; Isa. 5:20; Rom. 2:11; James. 2:1-9).

A prudent man of faith, should never focus solely upon the things he think he knows, but rather upon the things he doesn’t know (II Cor. 4:18). Nor become persuasively captured by what his mentors says, without fully examining the things which they fail to say; in order to free the people.

Over ninety percent of the Bible’s stories and events are centered upon the Negro Family of Nations, but is systematically kept from the public. Many clergymen realize this fact but will not disclose such truth, without the approval of people in high places (Eph. 6:12). However, a devoted churchman will never allow a non-believer to approve of what he should or should not believe (I Cor. 2:13-15). A sound minded saint will never settle for anything less than the truth, nor will he deny truth to acquire status and friends.

The affluent, poor, and the oppressed should be cautious not to perceive crucial conversations, with the certainty of facts it holds in the Bible as being radical. Nor condemn unwanted truths based upon one’s own personal misconceptions. It is plainly nonsensical to embrace another man’s past and deny one’s own history. The next generation must refrain from the Church’s misguided belief that People of Color, who seek to understand a Biblical lineage from Adam to Noah, Ham, etc., are promoting anti-truth! How absurd, and where in God’s message says that a person must remain uninformed to be a Christian (Matt. 7:7; I Cor. 2:10; John 15:15)? To hate one’s own culture is more dangerous than one’s own adversary’s hate, because it insures self-affliction without the other party’s participation. The Clergy’s character to practice anti-Hamitism is just as dangerous, as the practice of anti-Semitism. It appears that the world is more anti-Hamitic than Semitic.

It is obvious that this text will never be read by the majority, since it was researched for the intellectually-enlightened, and those who thirst for knowledge.

Author.

St. Louis, Missouri, June, 1999

I

The Beginning

The Creation and the Garden of Eden

IT HAS BEEN RECORDED that in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, and that it took the Lord God six days to complete His creation, where upon the seventh day He rested, but it was on the sixth day during the creation that God said: Let us make man in our own image (shadow or darkness of God in Hebrew), after our likeness:* and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the fowl of the air, and over cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

So the Lord formed man out of the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul.

God then planted a garden eastward in Eden, and there He put man whom He had formed. And out of the ground made the Lord to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight and good for food, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

A river went out of Eden to water the Garden, and from there it divided and became four heads. The first river was called the Pishon (Blue Nile), which compasseth the whole land of Havilah (Havilah, located in Africa, son of Ethiopia Gen. 10:6-7);** modernly called Djibouti or Somaliland. The name of the second river was the Gihon (Nile-River, the same as it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia Gen. 2:13); the third was Hiddekel (called Tigris, same as Nigris, since in the Hebrew Atbash, the T and N are interchanged; and the fourth was Euphrates. ***

The Lord God then took the man and placed him in the Garden of Eden to attend it. And the Lord God commanded the man, saying: of every tree of the garden thou mayest eat: but of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

*If the Old Bible Version (not the new version) describes God and Jesus to be perfect in their appearance; exhibiting a dark-burnt complexion and nappy Divine hair; then what period of time did such features become imperfect? If God and Jesus are said to have possessed pure-wool hair (modernly defined as unmixed African texture) and a burnt dark complexion, then why is the Negro-race said to be cursed, who bear the same Godlike features (Dan. 7:9; 10:6; Rev. 1:14-15)? The Son of God once stated that whosesoever shall be ashamed of Him (including His outward appearance), and His words, then He would also be ashamed of them (Luke 9:26).

††Havilah was also spelled Hamilah, since the Hamitic-Semitic V was interchangeable with M (Assyrian Grammar, Delitzsch, pp. 112, 115-116. 1889.

Africa is definitely the birthplace of man (Adam and Eve). In Genesis 2:13, the Garden of Eden is associated with Ethiopia. The Jewish historian Josephus and the eleventh century Bible commentator Rashi both agreed that the Gihon River which departed from Eden was the Nile in Africa.

Even though the Bible in Genesis 2:7-14, associates the Gihon (Nile River) and the Pishon (Blue Nile that circled Havilah, son of Ethiopia) to the Garden of Eden (Adam’s vicinity), these rivers are seldom mentioned and often omitted by European and American Bible storybooks. †

The Garden of Eden was like an earthly utopia or a park-like heaven that grew every tree being pleasant to the sight, with various kinds of vegetation. The paradise Eden contained every living animal and fowl of the air, a kingdom that required a unique steward like Adam (Adham) to live therein. The sanctuary Eden was also a dwelling area for God’s administration over Adam s affairs.

The beautiful Garden of Eden probably lost its perfect glamour following Adam’s departure, since Adam was no longer present to attend it, and during the Great Flood became obliterated!

The only Biblical territories that are compared with Eden are the Negro-Land of Canaan, Egypt and Ethiopia. Lot and Moses described Canaan and Egypt as Eden-like (Gen. 13:10; Deut. 11:10-27)! Canaan is identified as God’s-Land, a region of beauty and resources (Ex. 3:8; Lev. 25:23; Ps. 24:1; Jer. 27:5); The Garden of Eden (Africa), the Negro-Land of Canaan, Ethiopia Egypt, and the Sinai, were Lands where God dwelled (Ex. 36-40th chapters; Job 28:19; Ezek. 28:13; Hos. 12:9; 13:4; Acts 7:38). The Israelites once camped at the Mountain of God (Mt. Sinai). Canaan and the Sinai were part of Egypt-Africa when Egypt itself was called the Land of Ham (Ps. 105:23-27). One of the synonyms of Canaan is Eden!

Some Biblicists and scientists will advocate Asia instead of Africa as man’s first home. There are overwhelming reports that at the dawn of Asia’s history existed a black oily skinned, woolly-haired, snub-nosed, and puffy-lipped race, dwelling therein. The Greek Herodotus and Homer spoke of a huge powerful Negro civilization living in the far-East.

World researchers are aware that Africa exhibits astounding evidence of man’s birthplace; substantiating that it is Africa alone that reveals the world’s oldest bones, tools, utensils, and civilizations.††

Robert Davidson, in his book called Genesis 1-11 (p. 33. 1973), commented, that the Gihon and Pishon, which departed from Eden, were associated with Ethiopia and Upper Egypt.

***The Jewish Philo called the Euphrates Aracani, and Josephus, Prath. However, the Egyptians called the Euphrates "the Nile that flowed south in reverse (The Ancient History of the Near East, Hall, p. 231. 1920; and The Mystic Bible (Tigris means black), Dr. Stone, p. 114. 1968).

†The Bible in Living English, states (Byington. Gen. 2:13): The Gihon goes about the Negroes’ country.

††The earliest chapters of Genesis certainly reflects an African element! The first color mentioned in Genesis is the color dark or black (Gen. 1:3). The second chapter of Genesis reveals an African Garden of Eden, as Moses described rivers departing from the Garden, as circling African nations (Gen. 2:8-14); what is modernly called Assyria and the Middle East, was anciently called Northeast Africa. The first nations mentioned in the Bible are African nations (Havilah and Cush); Cush, which as a dual form represents the African Continent (first Continent mentioned in the Bible) and a nation, etc. (Gen. 2:11-13). Job and Ezekiel described Eden to have existed in Africa, since both prophets connected the Edenic gemstone topaz to Ethiopia (Job 28:19; Ezek. 28:13). Egypt, which was earlier controlled by Cush (Ethiopia), resembled the Garden of Eden, or God’s Garden (Gen. 13:10; Deut. 11:10). God-Elohim’s first earthly domicile (home) was in Edenic-Africa (Hos. 12:9; 13:4), †††which was also called Ham (Ps. 105:23-27; 106:19-23), the same as I Am or Yahweh, since the ancient letters H, Y and I were interchanged. The first man Adam was originally called Adham (God-Ham).

†††Read the 1611 KJV, not the NKJV or any other revised version.

Ezekiel 29:10 mentions more than one river between Egypt and Ethiopia, which proves the Pishon as an upper branch of the Nile. Professor Aharoni and Avi-Yonah link the Pishon with the upper branch of the Nile (The Macmillan Bible Atlas, p. 21. 1977). The Peloubet’s Bible Dictionary, p. 241.1973; Hastings’ Dictionary of the Bible (The Cushite Havilah journeyed from Africa to Arabia), Vol. II, p. 311, and The Roman historian Pliny (Pliny Ep. Vi. 28), spoke of a Havilah in East Africa.

Moses, Job, and Ezekiel spoke of the precious stones of Eden. In Genesis 2:11-12, Moses spoke of the land Havilah (Today’s Djibouti or Somaliland), which was positioned in East Africa (East of the Nile), of having gold, bdellium and the onyx stone.

In Job 28:19, Job mentions the topaz stone of Ethiopia, whereas Ezekiel listed the topaz as a stone of Eden (Ezek. 28:13)! The Encyclopedia Judaica says: The topaz was imported from Ethiopia, Vol. 13, p. 1009. 1971. In Genesis 2:10-13, God mentions Ethiopia during the creation of Eden.

The Greeks, including Alexander the Great, were convinced that Eden was in Africa (Wonderful Ethi­opians of the Ancient Cushite Empire, Houston, chap. 2, also the Babylonian Talmud (Yamid, 32-b).†

The Egyptians pronounced the word garden, Kam, the same as Ham (Egypt and Israel, Brewer, p. 255. 1910; and Comparative Grammar of the Semitic Language, O’Leary, p. 42. 1923).

†The Book of Jubilees (also called Genesis) placed the Garden of Eden west of the Gihon (Nile River), and that during the division of land, Ham settled to the right of the Garden (Jubilees 8:10-13, 22-25). Now, if Eden was not located in Africa, but Mesopotamia as alleged by Euro scholars, and the Western Church, then there are some serious discrepancies to their claim! If Ham happened to settle the right of a so called Asian Eden, then it would have placed him in the Eastern country of Persia (Iran), etc., and not Africa, which modernly bear the names of him and his sons (Gen. 2:10-13; Ps. 68:31; 78:51; 105:23-27; 106:22). Another drawback regarding an Asian Eden is that the oldest civilizations and human remains are not founded in what is called today’s Asia, but instead Africa. The Book of Jubilees and many other sacred texts, which reveals an African presence, have been removed from Euro bibles in the attempt to cover-up an African-Eden, and people of color; a wicked act that God sternly forbid (Deut. 12:32; Prov. 30:5-6; James 2:9; Rev. 22:14-15, 18-19).

It is shameful or disgraceful to value any religious or spiritual material that excludes Africa and its God fearing people, since the book of Genesis starts off by identifying an African element, and environment! In the comment: In the beginning... the word In is merely a Euro corrupted spelling form to camouflage the letter N, which is the abbreviation for Negro (Black or Nero), Night (evening and ravine), Nigger (God or King), Knight (a champion or hero), etc. The letter N, which existed long before the vowels, and is often expressed as the N word to infer Nigger, happens to be the World’s oldest founded single Divine letter to represent a Supreme-God!†† The Sacred letter N which is the first symbol of the Hebrew Alphabet, means God-Almighty (Aleph or Alpha). Today’s Godly letter N is shrewdly hidden in a Euro