Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Henry Sibley and the U. S.-Dakota War of 1862
    Henry Sibley and the U. S.-Dakota War of 1862
    Henry Sibley and the U. S.-Dakota War of 1862
    Ebook77 pages1 hour

    Henry Sibley and the U. S.-Dakota War of 1862

    By Rhoda R. Gilman

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    As the first of the MHS Express imprint, this short e-book will highlight the rifts and crises leading up to the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862 in Minnesota between the Dakota people and the U.S. government, as keenly represented by then-governor and later militia colonel Henry Sibley, and will weave together excerpts from the 2004 MHS book, Henry Hastings Sibley: Divided Heart, and with a new MHS Express introduction by author Rhoda Gilman.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherMinnesota Historical Society Press
    Release dateNov 1, 2012
    ISBN9780873518789
    Henry Sibley and the U. S.-Dakota War of 1862
    Author

    Rhoda R. Gilman

    Rhoda R. Gilman is the author of Henry Hastings Sibley: Divided Heart, The Story of Minnesota’s Past, and Stand Up! The Story of Minnesota’s Protest Tradition.

    Related to Henry Sibley and the U. S.-Dakota War of 1862

    Related ebooks

    Native American History For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      No Peace For Old Men

      Mar 26, 2019

      No Peace For Old Men
      12 min read

    • Article

      The New Southern Strategy

      Sep 2, 2020

      The New Southern Strategy
      10 min read

    • Article

      The Great Silence

      Aug 15, 2019

      The humans use Arecibo to look for extraterrestrial intelligence. Their desire to make a connection is so strong that they’ve created an ear capable of hearing across the universe. But I and my fellow parrots are right here. Why aren’t they intereste

      5 min read

    • Article

      ‘The Last Nomad’: Somali Refugee, Soccer Mom, And Everything In Between

      Aug 30, 2021

      Shugri Said Salh’s memoir strives for an accurate – rather than sensationalized or simplified – account of growing up in, and then fleeing, Somalia.

      4 min read

    • Article

      Slavery Did Not Die Honestly

      Oct 21, 2015

      Slavery Did Not Die Honestly
      7 min read

    • Article

      War On Sexism

      Feb 8, 2019

      War On Sexism
      7 min read

    • Article

      'A Bold and Dangerous Family' Ably Chronicles One Italian Family's Battle Against Mussolini

      Oct 5, 2017

      Moorehead, who grew up in Italy and speaks Italian, portrays the trials and intrigues of the Rosselli clan in intimate detail.

      3 min read

    • Article

      Wild And Woolly Basques

      Sep 25, 2018

      Wild And Woolly Basques
      4 min read

    • Article

      Sightings

      Oct 1, 2021

      FOR MANY YEARS, in this tiny mountain town, we avoided certain signs. Oh, we had trailhead signs and wooden slabs on brush-hidden driveways adorned with family names. But there was an unspoken rule: No signs for political candidates. Even when a neig

      3 min read

    • Article

      A Tale of Two Handmaids

      Dec 28, 2018

      A Tale of Two Handmaids
      8 min read

    • Article

      ‘Caught Between 2 Countries’

      Sep 23, 2021

      ‘Caught Between 2 Countries’
      4 min read

    • Article

      Devon, Droves And Jacobites

      Apr 11, 2020

      Devon, Droves And Jacobites
      13 min read

    • Article

      Hands Up! Don’t Shoot!

      Nov 24, 2020

      Hands Up! Don’t Shoot!
      5 min read

    • Article

      'Our History Is The Future' Puts Standing Rock In Broader Native American Story

      Mar 6, 2019

      In his new book, Nick Estes points a way forward, with solidarity and without sentimentality, to an idea of Indigenous land alive with ancestry and renewal.

      4 min read

    • Article

      A Lost Moment?

      Aug 24, 2021

      A Lost Moment?
      4 min read

    • Article

      Star Of The West

      Nov 14, 2023

      Star Of The West
      14 min read

    • Article

      Disarming Reconstruction

      Jan 16, 2024

      Disarming Reconstruction
      4 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Henry Sibley and the U. S.-Dakota War of 1862

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Henry Sibley and the U. S.-Dakota War of 1862 - Rhoda R. Gilman

      Chapter 1

      The Setting

      Henry Hastings Sibley came to Minnesota in 1834. Born of New England ancestry in the frontier fur trade mecca of Detroit, he was twenty-three years old and a rising star in the American Fur Company. By that time, however, the North American fur trade was in its final years. The tide of European migration had already swept across the Appalachian Mountains and into the Mississippi Valley. Land, not trade, was the prize that drew the endless army of settlers and sodbusters. They saw themselves not as conquerors but as a legion bringing civilization and the light of true religion to a wilderness and its savage inhabitants.

      Sibley was assigned to trade with the Dakota people. As early as 1805, the Dakota agreed to let the United States build a fort at the mouth of the Minnesota River, and in the 1820s they watched the fort be built and garrisoned with white troops. Except for the military reservation around it, no Dakota land had yet been taken, but in 1837 the tribe’s two eastern bands—Mdewakanton and Wahpekute—signed a treaty that gave up their claims to everything east of the Mississippi River. But that was not enough for white settlers. Soon, white settlers on farms and in small towns on the river’s east side began to look longingly at Indian land on the western bank.

      The years between 1840 and 1842 were a pivotal time in the life of Henry Sibley. He was an avid hunter who loved adventuring on the unspoiled prairies of western Minnesota and northern Iowa. In the fall and winter of 1840–41 he lived for several months with a Dakota band engaged in its winter hunt, and a few months later he became the father of a Dakota daughter. The year 1841 also saw the signing of a treaty that held out the flickering hope of a dramatically different future for the upper Mississippi region. Known as the Doty treaty, it would have turned the Dakota country from the Mississippi west to the James River into an all-Indian territory from which white settlers were excluded. Not only the Dakota but other Indian tribes would have been given permanent homes there, and eventually it would have become an Indian-governed state.

      Sibley was enthusiastic about the plan, writing that no other treaty had been better calculated for securing the interests of the Indians and of the people in the country. Apparently the Dakota thought so too, for they signed it immediately. The treaty was doomed, however, in the U.S. Senate. Although Sibley himself spent nearly four months lobbying in Washington, it was overwhelmingly defeated. Clearly, no barrier would ever be raised to protect Indian possession of the land. Twelve days later the American Fur Company closed.

      Sibley and his partner, Hercules Dousman of Prairie du Chien, continued in the fur trade for a few more years, supplied by the Chouteau Company of St. Louis, but both men could see that it was a losing business. The future lay with white settlement and development of the country, so they began to invest in land, lumber, and steamboats. Sibley turned to politics, but his lobbying was more successful in creating a new Minnesota Territory than it had been in ratifying the Doty treaty. The payoff was his election as delegate to Congress.

      During his four years in Congress, from 1849 to 1853, Sibley felt conflicted. Like most Americans of his generation, he was intensely patriotic. He accepted conquest of the west as divinely ordained and his duty to the United States as a sacred obligation. Nevertheless, his own human sympathy, his awareness of government duplicity, and his love for the land and its vanishing past left him with a divided heart and a troubled conscience.

      In the summer of 1850 he delivered a blistering speech to Congress on the subject of its corrupt and ruthless Indian policy. That policy, he said, had consistently led to extermination of Indian people. He predicted that history would in time do justice to the heroic bands who have struggled so fiercely to preserve their lands and the graves of their fathers from the grasping hand of the white man. In closing, he told the congressmen that the remaining tribes were being encircled as with a wall of fire, and unless there was a change, the country must very soon suffer the consequences of a bloody and remorseless Indian war.

      Even as he spoke, Sibley faced a bitter dilemma: his success depended on the very system he deplored. Among the voters of Minnesota Territory, popular demand for opening up the land across the river had become deafening. Meanwhile, Sibley himself had lost money in the fur trade, and he owed more to Chouteau and the bankrupt American Fur Company than he could ever recover—unless the Dakota paid their debts to him from treaty money. Congress frowned on spelling out that kind of payment in a treaty, but there were ways to achieve it. Both Sibley’s political career and his personal solvency were at stake.

      Without doubt, there had to be a treaty, and Sibley was the key man to set it up. In doing so, he navigated a complex network of power relationships, for both sides were divided, with different factions demanding different things. Standing behind Sibley, both pushing and supporting him, was Alexander Ramsey, the territory’s tough young governor. Short of Congress, Ramsey held final government authority over Indian affairs in Minnesota, and his political future was on the line no less than Sibley’s. A more uncertain element was Henry M. Rice, a onetime business associate of Sibley and also his rival for leadership of Minnesota Democrats. Altogether, the land-grab took more than three years and resulted in two similar treaties.

      Negotiating separately with the upper and lower bands of Dakota was part of Sibley’s strategy. The two upper (western) bands—Sisseton and Wahpeton—had endured several hard years, and many of them were near starvation. They looked to treaty payments for survival. The lower (eastern) bands were still receiving payments from the treaty of 1837 and were far less persuadable. Once the western bands had sold their land, however, the eastern

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1