Arms and the Man
4/5
()
About this ebook
George Bernard Shaw
George Bernard Shaw was born in Dublin in 1856 and moved to London in 1876. He initially wrote novels then went on to achieve fame through his career as a journalist, critic and public speaker. A committed and active socialist, he was one of the leaders of the Fabian Society. He was a prolific and much lauded playwright and was awarded the Nobel Prize for literature. He died in 1950.
Read more from George Bernard Shaw
Misalliance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5George Bernard Shaw - A Selection of One-Act Plays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Saint Joan: A Play Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mrs. Warren's Profession Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Major Barbara Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Bernard Shaw on Religion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCandida Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Collected Works of George Bernard Shaw: Plays, Novels, Articles, Letters and Essays: Pygmalion, Mrs. Warren's Profession, Candida, Arms and The Man, Man and Superman, Caesar and Cleopatra, Androcles And The Lion, The New York Times Articles on War, Memories of Oscar Wilde and more Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCaesar and Cleopatra Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philanderer Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5You Never Can Tell Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Perfect Wagnerite Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHeartbreak House Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Doctor's Dilemma Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Crime of Imprisonment Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Man and Superman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bernard Shaw on Literature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Devil's Disciple Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5THE COLLECTED WORKS OF GEORGE BERNARD SHAW: Pygmalion, Candida, Arms and The Man, Man and Superman, Caesar and Cleopatra… Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFanny's First Play Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bernard Shaw on Theater Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBernard Shaw on Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBack to Methuselah: A Metabiological Pentateuch Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Great Catherine: Whom Glory Still Adores Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Complete Works of George Bernard Shaw Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDon Juan in Hell: From Man and Superman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Saint Joan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to Arms and the Man
Related ebooks
Arms and the Man: Illustrated Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArms and the Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Arms and the Man Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPlays Pleasant Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArms and the Man (Annotated) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe London Sextet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMan and Superman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tales of Mystery and Imagination Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Man and Superman: “A life spent making mistakes is not only more honorable, but more useful than a life spent doing nothing.” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMasterpieces of American Wit and Humor Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSelected Prose Of Oscar Wilde Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWithout Dogma Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Love Episode Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVictory: "A caricature is putting the face of a joke on the body of a truth." Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mysteries of the Faceless King Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Book of Prefaces Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSongs of Leaving Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVaried Types Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRepresentative Plays by American Dramatists: 1856-1911: The New York Idea Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings7 best short stories by Valery Bryusov Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Skin of Our Teeth: A Play Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lectures on the English Comic Writers (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLetters on Literature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Novelist on Novels: 'The novel, too, does not live long'' Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Novelist on Novels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTwelve Types Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Novelist on Novels (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRosemary's Letter Book (Barnes & Noble Digital Library): The Record of a Year Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJohn Bull's Other Island Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVictory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Classics For You
East of Eden Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Good Man Is Hard To Find And Other Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bell Jar: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fellowship Of The Ring: Being the First Part of The Lord of the Rings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Stranger Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Learn French! Apprends l'Anglais! THE PICTURE OF DORIAN GRAY: In French and English Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rebecca Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Heroes: The Greek Myths Reimagined Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Princess Bride: S. Morgenstern's Classic Tale of True Love and High Adventure Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Animal Farm: A Fairy Story Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Canterbury Tales Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Things They Carried Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Silmarillion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Old Man and the Sea: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flowers for Algernon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Have Always Lived in the Castle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Odyssey: (The Stephen Mitchell Translation) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Warrior of the Light: A Manual Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Iliad: The Fitzgerald Translation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sun Also Rises: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jonathan Livingston Seagull: The New Complete Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Farewell to Arms Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As I Lay Dying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Master & Margarita Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Poisonwood Bible: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Titus Groan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Confederacy of Dunces Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Extremely Loud And Incredibly Close: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Arms and the Man
149 ratings4 reviews
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Enjoyable read, this play has good rythm, but for me it was simply entartaining, and nothing more. Much of the wit bounces off the two most chiselled characters, the maid Louka and the Swiss soldier, but the social satire feels dated today.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This is the only play I have read or seen by Shaw, but I must admit to enjoying it immensely. It is one of two plays I am tutoring undergraduates on this year, the other being Oliver Goldsmith's She Stoops to Conquer, both of which are very funny, but I think Shaw takes the cake for thoughtful social commentary. Whereas Goldsmith still buys into the dominant social discourse of his times, Shaw lacerates the war-mongering ethos of his 1890's audience while retaining great dramatic and humorous momentum.The play is set during the Serbo-Bulgarian war of the 1880's, but this does not matter much to the plot. Shaw wrote the play without reference to any specific conflict; in fact, he did not even give his characters names, but filled in the blanks in the text after consulting one of his friends on recent historical conflicts. Raina Petkoff, daughter of a Bulgarian major, is betrothed to Sergius Saranoff, a rising star in the Bulgarian army and Shaw's representation of the overly-Byronic hero. When Sergius initiates a suicidal cavalry charge on the Serbian forces, he and his forces miraculously survive, as the Serbs ordered the wrong ammunition for their machine guns. The Serbs retreat through the Petkoff's home town, and one of their hired mercernaries, the Swiss officer Bluntschli, escapes by climbing the balcony to Raina's room. She manages to hide him from the advancing Bulgarian forces for reasons that are not initially clear, though an amatory grounds are hinted at. Bluntschli, who carries chocolates instead of ammunition, returns to the Petkoff's house after a peace treaty to thank Raina and to return her father's favourite coat. But Sergius and Major Petkoff also arrive, leading to intrigue and confusion...Shaw, a practicing Socialist, is often accused of writing polemics and dressing them up in plays, but that does not seem true of this play, at least. The juxtaposition of Sergius, who believes in military glory, with Bluntschli, who views war pragmatically, is interesting and well handled. I also enjoyed the way Shaw deflates romantic views of love by, for instance, exposing the hypocrisy at the heart of Sergius and Raina's relationship, which, though supposed to be predicated on the ideal of the 'higher love', actually rests on empty emotions and deceit. Shaw also has things to say about class relationships, which aligns him with Goldsmith, but as mentioned above, Shaw seems much more perceptive concerning these issues.The play is very funny, and has aged well. I look forward to reading more Shavian plays - God knows the man wrote enough of the things (more than 50!).
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5An interesting and quirky 'love' play about the intricacies of love/war/romances and specifically the way love and relationships worked in 1885-1886 Bulgaria.
Shaw's irony/satire of high-society and the roles of men and women (specifically men coming home from military/war engagements) and how they interacted with the "commoners" (servants). Especially in relation to love and romance. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I love the chocolate cream soldier and I love the way he has Raina's number Why Louka wants a pig like Sergius I don't know, but it does create a certain symmetry. A lovely play.
Book preview
Arms and the Man - George Bernard Shaw
George Bernard Shaw
Arms and the Man
New Edition
LONDON ∙ NEW YORK ∙ TORONTO ∙ SAO PAULO ∙ MOSCOW
PARIS ∙ MADRID ∙ BERLIN ∙ ROME ∙ MEXICO CITY ∙ MUMBAI ∙ SEOUL ∙ DOHA
TOKYO ∙ SYDNEY ∙ CAPE TOWN ∙ AUCKLAND ∙ BEIJING
New Edition
Published by Sovereign
This Edition first published in 2018
Copyright © 2018 Sovereign
All Rights Reserved.
ISBN: 9781787247741
Contents
INTRODUCTION
ACT I
ACT II
ACT III
INTRODUCTION
To the irreverent—and which of us will claim entire exemption from that comfortable classification?—there is something very amusing in the attitude of the orthodox criticism toward Bernard Shaw. He so obviously disregards all the canons and unities and other things which every well-bred dramatist is bound to respect that his work is really unworthy of serious criticism (orthodox). Indeed he knows no more about the dramatic art than, according to his own story in The Man of Destiny,
Napoleon at Tavazzano knew of the Art of War. But both men were successes each in his way—the latter won victories and the former gained audiences, in the very teeth of the accepted theories of war and the theatre. Shaw does not know that it is unpardonable sin to have his characters make long speeches at one another, apparently thinking that this embargo applies only to long speeches which consist mainly of bombast and rhetoric. There never was an author who showed less predilection for a specific medium by which to accomplish his results. He recognized, early in his days, many things awry in the world and he assumed the task of mundane reformation with a confident spirit. It seems such a small job at twenty to set the times aright. He began as an Essayist, but who reads essays now-a-days?—he then turned novelist with no better success, for no one would read such preposterous stuff as he chose to emit. He only succeeded in proving that absolutely rational men and women—although he has created few of the latter—can be most extremely disagreeable to our conventional way of thinking.
As a last resort, he turned to the stage, not that he cared for the dramatic art, for no man seems to care less about Art for Art’s sake,
being in this a perfect foil to his brilliant compatriot and contemporary, Wilde. He cast his theories in dramatic forms merely because no other course except silence or physical revolt was open to him. For a long time it seemed as if this resource too was doomed to fail him. But finally he has attained a hearing and now attempts at suppression merely serve to advertise their victim.
It will repay those who seek analogies in literature to compare Shaw with Cervantes. After a life of heroic endeavor, disappointment, slavery, and poverty, the author of Don Quixote
gave the world a serious work which caused to be laughed off the world’s stage forever the final vestiges of decadent chivalry.
The institution had long been outgrown, but its vernacular continued to be the speech and to express the thought of the world and among the vulgar,
as the quaint, old novelist puts it, just as to-day the novel intended for the consumption of the unenlightened must deal with peers and millionaires and be dressed in stilted language. Marvellously he succeeded, but in a way he least intended. We have not yet, after so many years, determined whether it is a work to laugh or cry over. It is our joyfullest modern book,
says Carlyle, while Landor thinks that readers who see nothing more than a burlesque in ‘Don Quixote’ have but shallow appreciation of the work.
Shaw in like manner comes upon the scene when many of our social usages are outworn. He sees the fact, announces it, and we burst into guffaws. The continuous laughter which greets Shaw’s plays arises from a real contrast in the point of view of the dramatist and his audiences. When Pinero or Jones describes a whimsical situation we never doubt for a moment that the author’s point of view is our own and that the abnormal predicament of his characters appeals to him in the same light as to his audience. With Shaw this sense of community of feeling is wholly lacking. He describes things as he sees them, and the house is in a roar. Who is right? If we were really using our own senses and not gazing through the glasses of convention and romance and make-believe, should we see things as Shaw does?
Must it not cause Shaw to doubt his own or the public’s sanity to hear audiences laughing boisterously over tragic situations? And yet, if they did not come to laugh, they would not come at all. Mockery is the price he must pay for a hearing. Or has he calculated to a nicety the power of reaction? Does he seek to drive us to aspiration by the portrayal of sordidness, to disinterestedness by the picture of selfishness, to illusion by disillusionment? It is impossible to believe that he is unconscious of the humor of his dramatic situations, yet he stoically gives no sign. He even dares the charge, terrible in proportion to its truth, which the most serious of us shrinks from—the lack of a sense of humor. Men would rather have their integrity impugned.
In Arms and the Man
the subject which occupies the dramatist’s attention is that survival of barbarity—militarism—which raises its horrid head from time to time to cast a doubt on the reality of our civilization. No more hoary superstition survives than that the donning of a uniform changes the nature of the wearer. This notion pervades society to such an extent that when we find some soldiers placed upon the stage acting rationally, our conventionalized senses are shocked. The only men who have no illusions about war are those who have recently been there, and, of course, Mr. Shaw, who has no illusions about anything.
It is hard to speak too highly of Candida.
No equally subtle and incisive study of domestic relations exists in the English drama. One has to turn to George Meredith’s The Egoist
to find such character dissection. The central note of the play is, that with the true woman, weakness which appeals to the maternal instinct is more powerful than strength which offers protection. Candida is quite unpoetic, as, indeed, with rare exceptions, women are prone to be. They have small delight in poetry, but are the stuff of which poems and dreams are made. The husband glorying in his strength but convicted of his weakness, the poet pitiful in his physical impotence but strong in his perception of truth, the hopelessly de-moralized manufacturer, the conventional and hence emotional typist make up a group which the drama of any language may be challenged to rival.
In The Man of Destiny
the object of the dramatist is not so much the destruction as the explanation of the Napoleonic tradition, which has so powerfully influenced generation after generation for a century. However the man may be regarded, he was a miracle. Shaw shows that he achieved his extraordinary career by suspending, for himself, the pressure of the moral and conventional atmosphere, while