God and His Coexistent Relations to the Universe:: Scientific Advances of the Little Gods from Pantheism Through Deism, Theism, and Atheism to Panentheism

AuthorHouse™ LLC

1663 Liberty Drive

Bloomington, IN 47403

www.authorhouse.com

Phone: 1-800-839-8640

© 2014 George D. Shollenberger. All rights reserved.

No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means without the written permission of the author.

Published by AuthorHouse 01/28/2014

ISBN: 978-1-4918-5532-4 (sc)

ISBN: 978-1-4918-5531-7 (hc)

ISBN: 978-1-4918-5530-0 (e)

Library of Congress Control Number: 2014901489

Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Thinkstock are models, and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.

Certain stock imagery © Thinkstock.

Because of the dynamic nature of the Internet, any web addresses or links contained in this book may have changed since publication and may no longer be valid. The views expressed in this work are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher, and the publisher hereby disclaims any responsibility for them.

Scripture quotations marked KJV are from the Holy Bible, King James Version (Authorized Version). First published in 1611. Quoted from the KJV Classic Reference Bible, Copyright © 1983 by The Zondervan Corporation.

Scripture quotations marked NKJV are taken from the New King James Version. Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

Table of Contents

Introduction

Part I—How Knowledge is Produced

Chapter 1: Proving God’s Existence

Chapter 2: Two Tools of Knowledge

Chapter 3: Knowledge Begins With Mythical Cultures

Chapter 4: Knowledge Becomes Formal

Chapter 5: The Problem of Knowledge in the Physical and Life Sciences

Chapter 6: Seeking Truths

Relative and Absolute Truths

Using Opposites

Are Absolute Truths Found in Scriptures?

Part II—The 15th Century View of God and the Universe

Chapter 1: The Good/Evil Dualism

Chapter 2: The Identical/Difference Dualism

Chapter 3: An Introduction to Nicholas of Cusa

Chapter 4: A Critique of Positive Theology

Chapter 5: Two Major Ideas in Negative Theology

God Is Maximum and Minium

Images of God

Chapter 6: The Art of Conjecturing

Conjecture on Numbers

Conjecture on Actual/Possible

Conjecture On the Not-Other

Chapter 7: The Aftermath of Nicholas of Cusa

Part III—World Theories

Chapter 1: Mechanical and Geometrical World Theories

Chapter 2: Evolutionary Theory

Part IV—Jesus’ View of God and the Universe

Chapter 1: The Real Trinity of God

Chapter 2: The Holy Ghost

Chapter 3: The Teachings of Jesus

A Great Teacher

The Cycles of Jesus’ Work

The Minds of Little Gods Are Divine

Jesus Knew the Causes of Crime

Chapter 4: Other Early Views of the Universe

Abraham (monotheism)

Moses (creation)

Anaxagoras (All in One) and (One in All)

Plato (one and others)

Leibniz (monadology)

Georg Cantor (transfinite umbers)

Part V—God’s Intelligent Design

Chapter 1: A History of Hell

Chapter 2—A Modern View of God’s Intelligent Design

Christianity Did Not Develop Properly

Extending My First Book

God and His Universe Had No Beginning and Has No End

God is Inactive and Active

A New and Modern Monotheism

Revealing the Big Thinkers

Building Democracies

Part VI—Introduction To Blogging

Chapter 1: General Information

Chapter 2: Hundreds of Blogs

Chapter 3: China’s God and Universe

Notes

To George B. and Hilda

and my late sister, Anna

To my late wife, Evelyn and to my children

Steven, Lori, Karen, and Michael

To my grandchildren

Jamie, Mike, Kristen, Brig,

Cassidy, Steven, John, and Jack

To Lillian

Introduction

My First Book:

‘The First Scientific Proof of God: Reveals God’s Intelligent Design and a Modern Creation Theory’

In 2006, I wrote my first book and proved scientifically that God exists. This existence was rejected only by atheists. But this existence was accepted strongly by Stephen P. Smith, Ph.D., University of California. In 2010, this book was entered in the Scientific God Journal in Volume 1 Issue 4. So, this book is moving forward.

In this book, I discuss knowledge, science, religion, Nicholas of Cusa, Jesus, God/man communications, world theories, evolution and God’s Intelligent Design. I also discuss ‘symbols’ and their meanings and conclude that the of symbols of the English languages are troublesome and cause many crimes. But I conclude that criminals are not born. I conclude that symbols in scriptures are also troublesome. For example, some people say that God dictates scriptures to us through spirits. I reject this form of communication. Our relations with God are still vague.

In this book, I sought God’s existence. But I also wanted to define God. Nicholas of Cusa, who was a modern scientist, says that God is Trinitarian. But to defeat pantheism Abraham says that God is one and has no parts. If God has no parts, I conclude that God must have attributes that are able to create a universe we see in the evening sky. Thus, I conclude that the attributes of God can be contracted so that God’s infinite attributes will coexist with finite attributes of the universe that God created. In this book, I did find that the indivisible attribute of God coexists with the divisible attributes of the universe. So, I conclude that an infinite God coexists with finite things in the universe. Since God is greater than His own infinity, His scientific name is ‘not-not-finite.’

In this book, I present general and detail information on many different subjects of God and His universe. I also present the work of many researchers on God and a universe. In this book, I reject two major theories—evolutionary theory and the Big Bang theory. I also doubt that God and man do not communicate like we communicate with telephones. But I conclude that God and the mind of man will become related to God in interesting ways, but only if our ‘symbols’ and their meanings become more perfect. For this reason, I say we must go to full employment.

My Second Book:

‘A New and Modern Holy Bible With The Intelligent Design Of An Active God’

After six years, I make the second book (1) by rejecting the Trinitarian God, (2) by conducting research on Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Greece, (3) by conducting research on Jesus and his disciples (4) by connecting science, religions, democracies, etc. and (5 by identifying other attributes that connect God’s contracted attributes to the attributes of the universe.

In this book, I reject the Trinitarian God of Christianity. The Apostles Creed and The Nicene Creed say that ‘Father, Son, and Holy Ghost’ is one and trine. I say that God will not contract himself. If God would contract himself, pantheism and idolatry would be created. So, God/man cannot be one. So, Jews, Christians, and Muslims have developed very poor scriptures. So, when Jews and Muslims develop deism and Christians develop theism, these religions cause terrorism and wars.

A Son of God does not exist because the monotheism of Abraham is true, So I began to identify as many Big Thinkers as I could on the subject of monotheism. So, I started to conduct more research on Jesus. When I learned that Pope Irenaeus rejected Gnosticism in the second century, I concluded that the teaching of Jesus had aligned to Gnosticism. So, a major problem developed in Christianity in the 2nd century.

In six years, I connected the teachings of Jesus to Abraham’s monotheism, to the Greek monotheism of Anaxagoras in 500 B.C. and to the Greek monotheism of Plato’s Parmenides. Thus, I concluded that Jesus went to Greece at age 12, and stayed there for eighteen years as a Platonist. When he came home to teach the Greek monotheism, Jesus would be murdered in a few years by the Jewish monotheists, who accepted deism and rejected the panentheistic God that Jesus learned in Greece. Since I started blogging in 2006, after six years, my second book would reveal lots of hidden religious information. But I also found some more attributes that connect God to our universe.

This book discusses democracies and how the USA lost its God with the assassination of President Lincoln. With the loss of Lincoln, the American System of Economics was thrown into the circle file. With this loss, the USA became involved in many wars that would exist only to save the free enterprise system of England’s Adam Smith. With the loss of God, U.S. lawyers said that the Declaration of Independence (DOI) has no law. Without DOI laws, atheism began to grow. After WWII, television and atheism would come. By the 1970s, drugs came and converted atheists into a whorehouse of men and women. By the end of 20th century, most physicists became godless scientists. At the same time, the godless economists became killers of all governments. With very few economists, conservatives, and no God, deductive economics became the new leader of the U.S. freedom. Are more wars on the way?

A Hidden History of Man

In my research on my first and second book, I found a hidden history that was unknown to many people. For example, I found that man began to write and added qualities to the quantities to their tokens. With these different tokens, a new history began and changed th mind of man and changed the belief of an active God. Unfortunately, religions and logic began to grow differently. In the Western world, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam grew with the belief that the Universe comes to an end. And logic grew in the Roman courts with morals laws and without scientific laws. With this change, the Middle Ages never developed until the 14th century Renaissance opened the mind of man furthers. As modern science developed, the American mind did not develop the coexisting relations of man’s senses, man’s reasons, and God actions. In my third book, I correct this mental error and expect to eliminate many crimes and improve democracies.

Author’s Work At the U.S. Department of Justice

In 1971, I was evaluated by the staff of President Nixon and became a member of the National Institute of Justice to help solve the U.S. crime problems. My first job was to represent the Department of Justice at the White House. There, I had to listen to many new programs of President Nixon. For example, I heard about a 4-day work, an increased protein diet for all Americans, the management of underground space to control water flow, electricity flow, and the elimination of trucking on highways. I was impressed.

After reporting these new programs, I turned to the our nation’s crime problems. I make Kevlar vests that would save the life of cops, made new equipment for police cars, and developed community policing programs. In the late 1980s, my thoughts turned to the fundamental cause of crimes. Eventually, I concluded that all crimes are coming from the human mind, the ‘poor symbols’ and their poor meaning. When I retired in 1994, I told Attorney General Reno that I would continue my research on the human mind. In my third book, I will say that crime can be eliminated completely.

Cancer Comes To Man

After five years of retirement, my wife developed cancer. She used radiation and a promising chemical in Texas but died after five months from cancer. Since only surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, my mindy added ‘symbols’ to the problem of cancer. After my wife’s death, my research on symbols increased because, at Justice, many Republicans maintained that criminals are born. In six years, I found that criminals are not born. This conclusion turned my mind to God and my books.

My Third Book:

‘God and His Connections to the Universe:

With A Panentheistic God, An Endless Universe, Little Gods, and Hundreds of Blogs’

My third book was written after I studied and interpreted the teachings of Jesus on subjects such as Matt. 5:19, John 14:12, John 14:20, and Chapter 24 of Matthew and the death of our sun. Such subjects mean that God and the universe coexist and that the suns of the universe are always dying. Based on the teachings of Jesus, the Alpha and Omega of The Revelation of John and the theory of deism must be rejected. Accordingly, the death of Jesus on the Cross was a clear crime of murder by the Jewish Temple. So, my research work on religions and sciences had to change drastically. Almost every day for eighteen months, I posted new finding on my website.

Quickly, my research began to focus on the work of Galileo in the early 1700s on bodies. In his Two New Sciences, he says that all bodies have an infinite number of indivisible parts. I also focused on the work of Gottfried Leibniz in the late 1700s on infinitesimal bodies. In his Monadology, infinitesimal bodies are indivisible souls and are known in Greece as monads. Ben Franklin will take Leibniz’s work on immortal and indivisible souls to the American colonists, who will separate England from the United States.

But I also studied Leibniz’s Discourse of the Natural Theology of the Chinese. In this Discourse, Leibniz says China’s God is very old. Since ‘God is one’ in China, the monotheism of Abraham might have come from China. Furthermore, the God of China might have taken into Greece in 500 B.C. where Anaxagoras said that ‘God is one.’ In his Parmenides dialogue, Plato proves that the oneness of God is never without ‘others.’ So, if God is one, God and the universe had no beginning and has no end. For this reason, I say that all of the teachings of Jesus were only about the God of China, the God of Anaxagoras, the God of Confucius, the God of Plato, and the God of Abraham.

In a universe that is imperfect and has no ending, our minds must go to work continuously. The Chinese mind goes to work continuously with yin-yang moderations. All nations must use yin-yang moderations to develop natural and continuous human lives. To develop scientific truths about the infrastructures of the universe for all Little Gods, I suggest Riemann’s dissertation ‘On The Hypotheses Which Lie At The Foundation Of Geometry.’ This writing can be found in ‘A Source Book In Mathematics,’ (p. 411-421)’ by David Eugene Smith. Below is a note on Riemann:

‘Riemann, who was logically the immediate predecessor of Einstein, brought in a new idea of which the importance was not perceived for half a century. He considered that geometry ought to start from the infinitesimal, and depend upon integration for statements about finite lengths, areas, or volumes. This requires, inter alia, the replacement of the straight line by the geodesic: the latter has a definition depending; upon infinitesimal distances, which the former has not. The traditional view was that, while the lengths of a curve could, in general, only be defined as a whole, not as the limit or a sum of the little bits. Riemann’s view was that a straight line does not differ from a curve in this respect. Moreover, measurements being performed by means of bodies, is a physical operation, and its results depend for their interpretation upon the laws of physics. This point of view has turned out to be a very importance. Its scope has been extended by the theory of relativity, but in essence it is to be found in Riemann’s dissertation.’

The teachings of Jesus and the teachings of other Big Thinkers must be removed from the background of human life. Thus, they must be brought forward where God and the universe and Little Gods become known worldwide. The latest information about the Little Gods is that God gives all Little Gods a new body after deaths in man and woman in any nation. So, all nations must become equal and all competitive economies must be eliminated.

Seven Years of Blogging

On June 9, 2006, I published my first book on God’s existence. After this proof, I continued and expanded by research on God became a blogger at http://georgeshollenberger.blogspot.com/. In six years, I produced 2055 blogs on the subject of God and the universe. Atheists and religious people challenged my blogs. The atheists terminated their challenges after my first book received a great review and was published in the Scientific God Journal in 2010.

A Killer and False God

When people of nations allow deism, theisn, or atheism to exist they allow a false and killer god to function everywhere in their nations. In the USA, some people accepted deism and theism, other people accepted atheism, and the U.S. Government said that the Declaration of Independence (DOI) has no laws. Without DOI laws, the, U.S. economists install a deductive economy in the USA. This economy turned more people into atheism.

When the U.S. space progran was started by President Kennedy, there was hopes of many U.S. citizens to return to sound religions. But drug use came and slowly reduced the U.S. space program. Thus, the high tech companies of the space program turned toward mental and health care problems. But without a panentheistic God and without a coexisting universe, human problems, such as cancer, ould not be solved. As a technological person, I say that all human problems can be solved only by knowing the coexistence of God and His universe. Thus, I say that deism, theism, atheism, and a deductive economy cannot solve the human body problem, such as cancer and do not bring proper feelings to the human mind.

A Big Job Is Ahead For All Little Gods

In my books, I say that God exists, is one, and is active. To be one and exist, God must have all potential powers for His action. For God to be one, Plato says that the oneness of God coexists with other things. So, when God acts and creates, God coexists with all other things. But coexisting do not mean that God and other things form a mathematical unity. Coexisting means that very different things can coexist. So, we can say that God and the universe form a single world, which had no beginning and has no end. Thus, my single world is new, scientific, and rejects deism. Deism has a beginning and has an end and is the current belief of most religions today. Based on my single world, humans are reborn in the universe. On the other hand, deism says that humans are reborn in Heaven. This is not possible if God is infinite. So, my scientific books are correcting every religion.

So, when all Little Gods begin their new Big Job, they must determine why God and other things coexist. When they answer these questions, they might soon learn why human problems, such as cancer, should not coexist with God. So, when Little Gods start this Big Job, I expect Little Gods to improve all our lives continually. On th other hand, if deism is maintained, cancer will kill more Little Gods and deism will develop more more and more Little God problems.

Since the people of China never accepted deism, they have always been working on the Big Job that I have been talking about. So, for a long time, the Chinese have been working on a God and universe that coexist and have sought answers to human problem for a long time with human senses, human reasoning, and yin-yang relations that coexist.

So, my third and last book focuses on a panentheistic God, God’s endless universe, the rebirths of Little Gods, the equality of all nations, the democracies of all nations, and the development of China.

About the Author

In 1929, George was born in Pine Grove, PA. He loved mathematics early and became a varsity basketball player in the 10th grade. He was honored by the State of Pennsylvania when he graduated. He enlisted immediately in the U.S. Army and became a radio technician fo the Army Security Agency in Germany. After the U.S. Army, he started college at Gettysburg. Having no more cash, he went to work in Baltimore to develop the space program against Russia’s Sputnik spacecraft and started night school at John Hopkins University. After converting analog to digital electronics, he was sought by many corporations. T his digital system went into a spacecraft that carried John Glenn in an orbit around planet earth for the first time. But in the late 1960s, he became a diabetic and he had to slow down. So, he joined the U.S. Department of Justice to solve the growing U.S. crime problem.

His first assignment took him to the White House. There, President Nixon wanted (1) to develop a 4-day work week; (2) increase the protein diet of all Americans with the increased production of pigs; and (3) develop the underground—for all water flow, for all electricity flow, and for all industrial production flow. He was impressed by the U.S. government. At Justice, he helped toe develop bullet-proof vests, which saved the lives of hundreds of police. As time passed, his mind became very interested in God because he wanted to empty the U.S. prisons and fill the pews of religions. He rejected Darwin’s evolution theory and concluded that crime is caused by the flawed languages of every nation.

In 1994, he retired. In 2006, he made his first book to prove scientifically that God exists. In 2012, he made another book to expose truths about God, the universe, God’s Intelligent Design, and the life of humans. A third book ads hundreds of blogs on God, the universe and the Little Gods. Since he concluded that only one religion exists, he founded ‘The Panentheistic Church of Jesus.’

Part I—How Knowledge is Produced

Chapter 1: Proving God’s Existence

For thousands of years godly rulers and philosophers sought a political system that could serve people instead of ruling them. However, such a political system was not found until the United States of America (USA) came into existence in1776 as the first free nation. To free themselves, the American colonists became revolutionists and declared their independence from England by preparing and distributing the Declaration of Independence. But, England did not accept this declaration as a natural human right. So, the Revolutionary War was started and was won by the colonists. After the war, the colonists prepared the US Constitution to define its limited form of government. This limited form of government was identified in the social contract theory of England’s John Locke. Unfortunately, most Americans still do not understand the significance of this new political system, its social contract, and a limited government.

To glue these important political events to the mind of all Americans, I discuss the new politics, its social contract, and a limited government often in this book. My words on these discussions are guided by the following words of Jesus: Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand (Matt. 12:25). With these words, Christ is told us that a nation can fail if the citizens of a nation are divided. So, I show how to unify and maintain an undivided nation of people. To unify Americans, I had to prove the existence of God because an active God made an Intellectual Design of an endless universe. And, to maintain this undivided nation of people forever, I believe that the current two-party system, which is destroying the USA, must be destroyed because all human rights are not arbitrary and thus come from God.

As the first free nation, the founders of the USA did not claim their independence without thought. US independence was a rational thought of the colonists because the powerful ruling government of England did not respect the rights from God Instead of legislating laws of God, the government of England made arbitrary laws. Arbitrariness was not in the minds of the colonists because they had considerable facts about God and the universe in which we live. The colonists had a choice to start the USA either with or without God. They could not prove God but did know that the nonexistence of God could not be proven. The Declaration of Independence shows that they chose to start the USA with God. The founders made an excellent decision because the first scientific proof of God’s existence is presented below. This modern creation reveals God’s Intelligent Design of the universe.

The first scientific proof of God’s existence demonstrates the awesome power of the 17th century discovery of the scientific method of proving truths or falsities., I also prove that life sciences can also use the scientific method to prove their data and theories. Thus, I make the scientific method of proof available to both hard and soft scientists, by extending the scientific method of proof to the life sciences. This extension is possible because th meaning of word-symbols can be as precise as number-symbols and mathematical procedures.

I believe that other Americans were searching for ways to build the life sciences. For instance, in the 1870s, research was being conducted on the American System of economics by Henry Carey. He was an economic advisor to Abe Lincoln. He challenged the imprecise meanings of economic words used by proponents of the British System of economics.i This system is supported by most US economists today. Is this why the US economy dances like a chicken with its head cut off? In the 1930s, the works of Kenneth Burke and RKO Studio in Hollywood seem to be efforts to improve our languages. Burke had success by predicting the Holocaust, merely by analyzing key words in Hitler’s book, Mein Kampf.ii RKO was also using movies to teach US citizens and students. Apparently, Senator McCarthy thought that using the movies to teach people is a form of communism is not entertainment.

Since more than 200 years have passed since the founding of the USA, the absence of a proof of God has caused the development of unexpected social problems. Examples are terrorism, oil depletion, family disputes, drug use, high divorce rates, robbery, theft, child abuse, burglary, and murder. What is producing social problems? I argue and show that such problems have their origin in deeper social problems such as poverty, citizen ignorance, justice and economic failures, and religious differences. When I conducted research on the US crime problem at the US Department of Justice, I concluded that these deeper problems began to emerge after Abe Lincoln was assassinated. My research concluded that Abe was killed by Americans who disagreed with Lincoln’s effort to enforce the Declaration of Independence. His enemies also disagreed with the human right ‘all men are created equal.’ Apparently, Abe’s killers also did not agree with his effort to perfect the Union, which is mandated in the Preamble of the US Constitution. Abe’s desire to industrialize the South and develop the West with homesteaders was his way of perfecting the Union. I conclude that only the Lincoln and Kennedy administrations tried to perfect the Union in significant ways. Yet, both were assassinated!!!

I conclude that Lincoln’s killers had personal interests and did not like the idea that the USA was founded as a godly Union of undivided people. I also conclude that people in England might have been involved in Lincoln’s assassination. For instance, in 1859, Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theory was published in England by people other than Darwin. This publication was available about two years before Abe became our 16th president. Was the purpose of the early publication of Darwin’s work to stop Lincoln politically? This 1859 event in England followed the many discussions of John C. Calhoun in support of slavery for cheap Southern cotton for England’s textile industry. The 1859 publication was followed by the Scopes Trial in 1925. This was a trial of John Scopes, a high school biology teacher who violated a Tennessee law forbidding the teaching of evolution. This trial was another attempt to divide US citizens on the subject of slavery. Today, evolutionary theory, a godless theory, is increasing its influence in the USA through high school textbooks. Yet, no scientific proof of evolutionary theory has ever been found. My proof of God is inconsistent with evolutionary theory. This book shows that the evolutionary theory is false and that high school teaching of evolutionary theory is developing the mind of children improperly.

With a godly political system installed in the USA and the development of modern science throughout the Western world, all wars should have been prevented and world peace should already exist. However, wars are still occurring and a world peace has not developed. Why do we still have wars and no peace? Unlike a tiger that only seeks its next meal, man’s godly instinct seeks answers to his questions as well as seeking his next meal. Unfortunately, widely accepted answers to man’s questions about God have not come fast enough. Accordingly, atheism and materialism have grown.

In the USA today, many Americans are holding their belief in God. A proof of God’s existence is thus necessary for the people of the USA and all other nations. Below, I prove that God exists. Then, in Part IV, I expand our knowledge of God and the universe.

The First Scientific Proof of God’s Existence

Using the symbols, finite and infinite, God’s existence can be expressed with the following statement: all finite things are originated by an infinite thing. The finite things can be sensed by looking at things in your environment around you or by looking into the evening sky.

God’s existence is proven if God is that infinite thing. This data and theory satisfy the two-step method of proof known as the scientific method of proof. The proof that God is that infinite thing uses the dictionary meanings of the symbols, finite and infinite, and rejects the use of the mathematical infinite in determining the meaning of the infinite in the above statement.

When the symbol finite is negated, a new symbol, not-finite, is created by the mind. Eventually, not-finite was written as infinite but does not change its meaning. In his Sophist at 257b Plato says, When we speak of ‘that which is not,’ it seems that we do not mean something contrary to what exists but only something that is different.iii

What are the meanings of the symbols, finite and infinite? In today’s dictionaries, the symbol finite means ‘having definite or definable limits; neither infinite nor infinitesimal.’ And, the symbol infinite means ‘subject to no limitation or external determination; greater than any preassigned finite value however large.’ As seen, finite and infinite are real and precise contraries. Plato’s new definition of ‘not’ was significant because it lifts our minds above the logic of Aristotle and into metaphysics.

Furthermore, one cannot say that a finite thing cant originate all finite thing because a contradiction would be created by our minds. So, if the Big Band is a finite thing, the Big Bang thing cannot be the orign of all finite things.

The scientific method of proof is consistent with a linguistic discovery in the 1920s. This discovery says, sense-data are primarily symbolic.iv The meanings of symbols must be precise to express truths. The physical sciences have accomplished this feat by using number-symbols and mathematical procedures. They were successful because they learned how to express laws with number-symbols and mathematics. They also learned how to prove these laws when they discovered the scientific method of proof. It is now time for the life sciences to feel the same kind of success with word-symbols. The field of law has already begun this effort with the adversary system and its current method of proof. With more kinds of evidence, such as forensic science, and strong juries, this field is showing us the way to a rational life.

Pantheism (or Polytheism) means that God is all created things

Deism and Theism means that God is either inactive or active after creation.

Panentheism means that God cannot be exhausted and is active after creation.

The sidebar identifies four theories of God. Pantheism is the earliest theory of God. It developed idolatry and was eventually rejected by monotheism, a theory that God is one. Deism is primarily the Jewish theory of God whereas theism is the Christian theory of God. Panentheism is a more recent theory of God. Pan-en-theism means ‘all’ is ‘in’ God. Gregersen believes that three forms of panentheism exist in Western thought.v Clayton identifies thirteen different positions offered by the current panentheists.vi In Part V, I show that panentheism is the true theory of God and that deism and theism are false theories of the Jews, Christians, and Muslims.

In the Greek language ‘in’ means that a container exists and can be filled. For instance, a glass is a container that can be filled with water. The things in the universe are not contained, not even by the universe. So, when I say a thing is ‘in’ another thing in a way that it is that thing, a functional relation exists between these two things.

In the universe God is in all created things in a way so that each thing is what it-is-able-to-be. Thus, a spiritual atom will form all bodies that become what-it-is-able-to-be. The sidebar tells us the Greek meaning of the symbol ‘in.’ Jesus uses the symbol ‘in’ at John 14:20 to show that God and all humans are functionally related.

Unfortunately, some people (e.g., the US Supreme Court) say that God is only a theory of religion. How can this be true if man’s thoughts about God existed before religions exist? The word-symbols, theory and practice, distinguish God and all religions. Many different theories of God have been developed by many different people throughout history. Their different theories have led to different religious practices (or rites). Some people practice a theory of God merely by walking in Nature.

Any one of the four theories of God in the sidebar above can be chosen by people. Thus, it was incorrect for the US Supreme Court to rule that God is a theory of the field of religion. With this view, the Supreme Court separates State and God as well as State and Religion. Yet, the Constitution separates only State and Religion. This Supreme Court error has caused many social problems and problems in the US government and private institutions. For instance, colleges and universities advertise as ‘nonsectarian.’ With this advertisement, they cannot conduct research on the theory of God. This is the way Johns Hopkins University operates according to its President, William Brody. I argue that our nonsectarian governments and non-sectarian public institutions can conduct research on the theory of God without violating the US Constitution. How can the US Supreme Court and our higher institutions of education separate God and State when the Declaration of Independence does not separate them?

It seems that our founders did not separate State from God because they knew that the people would be free to develop theories of God and theories of creation. If a nation of humans has the right to know, it seems that the right to know God would be shared by all people in that nation. This includes those people who do work for a limited government. I argue that change in government is necessary immediately on the theory of God and the theory of creation. I conclude that the separation of State and God by the US Supreme Court is unconstitutional and inconsistent with my proof of God and the US Declaration of Independence. I also conclude that this judicial separation is a major cause of the growth of atheism in the USA. My research concludes that this separation can transform the people of a nation into a godless, a criminal, and an immoral nation. The moral degeneration of the USA is very noticeable today.

Many people have developed theories of God and theories of creation. For instance, I have developed a theory of God and a theory of creation in this book. Haussmann tells us that the first creation theory was developed in ancient Egypt about five thousand years ago.vii This was a geometrical theory and was developed by the brick and stone masons who built the Great Pyramid at Giza. Haussmann says that this Egyptian creation theory was excised by royal decree from the earliest version of the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible in 1611.viii This is why Moses’ theory of creation is the only creation theory found in the KJV. After his study in the temples of Egypt, Plato (427-347 BC), he developed a geometrical creation theory. It is found in his Timaeus. His unlimited God is unchanging whereas his universe is always changing. The ancient Greek atomists, Empedocles (484-.424 BC) and Democritus (460-370 BC), developed atomic creation theories. And, Epicurus (340-270 BC) also developed an atomic creation theory. Other creation theories appeared after the Middle Ages came to an end.

Historians agree that the Middle Ages ended with the work of Nicholas of Cusa. But, they do not tell us that Cusa developed a new and powerful creation theory. Nicholas describes God as the ‘coincidence of all opposites.’ Thus, his theory of God is not understood easily by logicians. Logic and its law of contradiction must be used carefully if one expects to unify a theory of God and a theory of creation. But, if one learns how to use logic properly, a person can become a panentheist. A panentheist argues that God is both creator and creature. This duality is the God of Christianity. Nicholas unifies his theory of God and his theory of creation with the pair of opposites, identity and difference. All created things thus become images of God. I discuss the complex creation theory of Nicholas in detail in Part II

After Nicholas’ death, Isaac Newton developed a new creation theory. It was the first mechanical theory of creation. A mechanical theory has no active God. Newton’s theory of God is deism. Newton’s God must rewind the universe if He decides to create a second universe. In the 17th century, Gottfried Leibniz also develops a new creation theory. His universe has atoms known as monads. I apply his monads in my modern creation theory in Part IV. I call them spiritual atoms because they are spirits and form a spiritual-physical universe.

Interestingly, physical scientists are developing contradictions in their thoughts because they do not believe in God and Intelligent Designs. As nonbelievers, they accept the following law: all finite things are caused by a finite thing. This law is illogical because a finite thing cannot cause itself. Yet, this contradictory law is currently used by physical scientists on the Big Bang theory of the universe. And, evolution theorists are supported by these physical scientists. So, the Big Bang theory and the evolutionary theory are based on a law that has a contradiction.

The existence of God is consistent with other theories. For instance, I developed a theory of energy of the universe that is consistent with the unlimited energy of God. God creates energy or any other finite thing by contracting His unlimited attributes. Using the theory of contraction, my theory of energy thus asserts that God’s one and infinite energy is contracted, by plurality and finitude, to make many different and related finite forms of energy available in the universe. In Part II, Nicholas uses the theory of contraction to expose many created things from God. In Part V, I show that a one and infinite God creates all things as many different and related things.

I divide these many different and related energies into hidden and unhidden energies. Hidden energies are not found the same way our senses find unhidden energy resources such as wood, coal, oil, and natural gas. Instead, hidden energies are found with our senses and mind. This means that our minds are able to conceive energies that are currently hidden from our senses. The existence of hidden energies is consistent with an infinite God. Thus, hidden energies must be in God’s Intelligent Design of the creation. How is the US Department of Energy going to find these hidden energies when its employees are not allowed to think about God or His Intelligent Design? To depend on unhidden energies such as Middle East oil is an ignorant US government policy. What is wrong with our leaders?

Since God is infinite, the energy He can create is unlimited. The unlimited source of God’s energy is found in the universe as a plurality of finite energies. Fusion energy is one example of a hidden energy. It was found by the mind of Albert Einstein and is expressed with his famous equation, E = mc². Solar energy was also a hidden energy that was found when man found electromagnetic energy. Solar energy has two related forms of energy—light energy and heat energy. The wind is also a hidden form of energy. This source of energy was found in 5 AD. Today, windmills are used to generate electrical energy. On the other hand, all unhidden energies are fossil energies, which must be mined under ground or by burning bushes and trees.

The finite energies created by God are unlimited because God is unlimited. These unlimited finite energies must exist if we live eternally. Since unhidden energies are limited on every planet, we must search for the hidden energies that God created for all planets. For instance, I believe that we will find unhidden energies in the oceans, lightning, tornados, and hurricanes.

My scientific proof of the existence of God is also consistent with the necessary things we need to stay alive forever. For instance, we need clean water and proper food to stay alive. This is why Terri Schiavo was murdered. She was murdered because she was denied the right of water and the right of food. In an interview, her father said that she died just like a person who died on a desert of starvation and lack of water. Her mouth was like raw meat and her insides must have been the same way. We always need new ideas. But, to find new ideas, the mind must be improved continually by our educational systems.

The proof of God’s existence establishes new demands on every human. Further, God demands that all nations learn how to live and work together. Initially, nations must develop a single talking language and a single scientific language. Talking languages allow people to communicate with each other. And, scientific languages allow people to build knowledge of Nature, which provides us with a clearer understanding of God. Our mind, senses, and feelings work together to build this knowledge. If these new demands are not satisfied, I conclude that all nations will become isolated and warlike. And, if nuclear weapons are developed in the meantime, I believe that life on planet earth will come to a rapid end.

In my creation theory, the mind is not a metaphysical view of the brain. My theory of mind is different from the current theories generated by the physical scientists, biologists, medical doctors, and evolutionists. The nature of the human mind is a tool that was given only to man by God. Thus, man’s mind is not a slave of the brain. God made man as a being that searches for truths. St. Paul describes this truth seeking process in the Bible at Rom. 1:20. Essentially, Paul is telling us that all invisible (or hidden) things from God can be known with our minds. Thus, man must plow into the unknown eternally. Humans cannot rest. Let me now discuss some mental tools that God gave us to plow the unknown.

Chapter 2: Two Tools of Knowledge

To make ‘books of knowledge’ two tools are needed to plow into the unknown where knowledge can be found. The two tools are the brain and vocal tract. I view these tools as organs of our mind. In my modern creation theory, mind is the first thing unfolded by God. Mind is the first because man must have access to all created things in order to conceive them and build knowledge about Nature and God. In Part V, I show that our mind is a dominant spiritual atom that is organized with other non dominant spiritual atoms. The non dominant spiritual atoms give our mind a body. The mind-body complex is thus a whole.

All spiritual atoms can perceive things. Some of them can perceive things clearly whereas others have confused perceptions. The confused atoms form into nonliving things such as iron, silica, oxygen, etc. However, when a spiritual atom perceives clearly, a living thing is formed. Such a living thing has a specific degree of freedom and can make choices of action according to this degree of freedom. However, only those spiritual atoms that organize a human being can build rational knowledge. Because of our ability to develop knowledge, humans are co-creators of God and able to conceive and know the things that God creates. Thus, the human mind is not a metaphysical image of the brain, as biologists, medical doctors, and evolutionists say. The brain is merely an organ of our living minds.

The mind and brain interact and develop together. The brain is developed by the mind, just as the muscles of our arms and legs are developed by our minds. Mind develops the brain, for instance, when a person walks, sings, dreams, organizes knowledge, etc. The development of the brain by the mind tells me that Terri Schiavo was not cared for properly by the US medical system. Then, 15 years after she had brain damage, she was murdered by our judicial system by denying her food and water. Her brain damage softened the brain and had to be hardened by mental exercising. Her brain became smaller after 15 years because the medical system did not exercise her mind. In 1994, I had brain damage. The damage was the result of a carotid artery blockage. The language function in my brain was damaged because my brain became soft. I had to harden my brain by exercising my mind with a computer game. I recovered most of my language abilities in two years. Only my memories of the names of people were not fully recovered. My brain damage convinced me that mind and brain are distinct and that mind is spiritual whereas the brain is an organization of spiritual atoms.

The other tool, the vocal tract, had to develop so humans can develop personal interests and social relations. These interests and relations are necessary because all humans have personal and social responsibilities to God. The personal interests and social relations are necessary because the development of human knowledge is an endless process that cannot be completed. We need a brain and a vocal tract and other less known knowledge developing tools because God is transforming His infinite wisdom to us. Without this transformation, we could not build knowledge of the universe eternally. And, if we receive this wisdom but do not transform it into human knowledge, we are unable to satisfy our personal and social responsibilities to God. Thus, contrary to many religious teachings, God needs our help just as we need His help. This God-man partnership is consistent with my scientific proof of God’s existence.

Today, we are able to survive at high population levels only because our ancestors contributed to the development of these basic tools. With their contributions, we are able to socialize, build new ideas and new knowledge, and enjoy life. Their contributions occurred because their personal interests and social relations caused them to develop symbolic languages, the only kind of language that can build human knowledge. Only with the development of symbolic languages, could the population of the human specie multiply. With knowledge, we build symbolic languages, lift our conscious minds upwardly and onto higher and higher planes of consciousness. With these higher planes of consciousness, we not only improve our knowledge of the universe, we also increase our understanding of God. Apparently, our ability to improve our knowledge of Nature and to understand God better was known long ago. For instance, at Job 32:8 of the Old Testament, Job says, But, there is a spirit in man and this of the Almighty giveth them understanding. This spirit is our mind, that is, a spiritual atom. But, Jews and Christians believe that God communicates to man through the Holy Spirit. I argue that this belief is an error.

In support of human freedom and human developments, Bruce Smith, director of the archaeological program of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History, challenges evolutionary theory. Such challenges are necessary because evolutionary theory is a godless theory. Evolutionary theory assumes that human behavior is governed only by the desire to survive. But, this assumption can be challenged because Charles Darwin found relations in all species that have no utility. These other relations are functional and give creatures new life forms if development occurs. What is the basis of Smith’s challenge? Evolution theorists argue that farming was not a free choice of humans. They claim that Nature’s force of natural selection caused people to move from the most hospitable areas for hunting and gathering to the less hospitable areas. Thus, they are saying those forces of Nature, not our minds, make our choices. In response to the evolutionists, Smith shows that agriculture appeared in the heart of the most hospitable areas because man chose ‘agriculture’ over ‘hunting and gathering.’ Thus, natural selection did not bring forth agriculture. But, neither did natural selection bring forth man’s space visit to the moon in the 1960s.

Archeologists tell us that man’s tools for developing knowledge are improving continually. These improvements are seen in the tools they find in their diggings. This continuity indicates that the human brain becomes more organized as time passes. The improved organization of the mind and brain is consistent with my modern creation theory because God gave us freedom and the intellectual ability to improve them. Accordingly, I do not agree with those people who say that the Ten Commandments in the Old Testament are commandments of God. Instead, I view the Ten Commandments as new ideas of Jews who improved the tools they used to develop knowledge. Archeologists also tell us that the size and shape of the human brain have changed over time. These changes correlate with the kind of tools humans develop and use. Further, they also say that the size and shape of the human skull changes with brain changes. Furthermore, they tell us that the vocal track changes. Obviously, such changes are caused by expansions of our talking languages. The yearning for knowledge is a natural property of unconfused spiritual atoms. Thus, yearns are not the result of some mechanical force in natural selection. Changes in the brain, skull, vocal track, and languages show us that man has been developing new tools of knowledge building for a long time.

Archeologists also tell us that Homo erectus humanoids functioned at conscious levels higher than today’s apes. This higher level indicates that the mind of Homo erectus is less confused compared to the higher confusion of the mind of apes. The size of the brain of Homo erectus is the size of a modern Homo sapiens. Homo habilis, which preceded Homo erectus, are called the handyman because he used stone tools to make things. The uses of stone tools indicate the brain of Homo habilis was organized more than the mind of apes. Recent reports show that Homo erectus existed as late as 27,000 years ago. Accordingly, Homo erectus and Homo sapiens have some overlap. This overlap indicates that different humanoid cultures might have been developing different talking languages. I conclude that brain organization and enlargements of Homo habilis and Homo erectus and the long duration of Homo erectus was the result of the development of new lines of reasoning with their simple talking languages.

An interesting discovery was announced in the October 2004 issue of Nature. In Indonesia, a third human specie was found and named Homo floresiensis. The other two human species are Homo Sapiens and Neanderthal men. The Homo floresiensis specie has hobbits. The members of this species are thus dwarfed humans. They are 3 feet tall, have a small brain (about the brain size of a chimpanzee), and use sophisticated stone tools. Archeologists say that hobbits lived about 18,000 years ago. However, based on the sophisticated stone tools used by hobbits, they are like the humanoids of Homo erectus who used stone tools more than one million years ago. The discovery of these hobbits indicates that intelligence is not determined by brain size. Instead, this discovery indicates that the brain is organized by mind. This discovery also challenges the belief that humans and apes evolved from the same ancestor.

I conclude that the enlargement and reorganization of the human brain have been in response to the increasing activities of the mind and the steady improvement of our symbolic language systems. Apes and chimpanzees have bodies similar to humans. However, cats and dogs also have similar bodies. This does not mean that dogs and cats came from the same ancestor. The belief that humans and apes come from the same ancestor is not sound. If the atoms of the universe are spiritual, the mind organizes the body. The minds of apes and chimpanzees are very different from the minds of humans. This difference can be seen in their languages. Apes use sign languages whereas humans use symbolic languages. The apes do not build libraries. But, we do. The differences between species are in God’s Intelligent Design and are not the result of a mechanical force in Nature.

With respect to the development of symbols, Crelin informs us that man’s vocal tract was improved significantly between 50,000 and 500,000 years ago, that is, when Homo erectus and Homo sapiens coexisted. He concluded that the development of the vocal tract was improved mostly between 35,000 and 40,000 years ago.ix This improvement was possible only if man walked upright so that speech sounds could be created and voiced. So, I believe that speech sounds could be heard from those upright walking humanoids who lived more than four million years ago. Further, the development of the human vocal tract correlates with the growth of the frontal lobes of the brain and the enlargement of the 45,000-year-old skull that was found in Mount Carmel, Israel. This ‘Israel Man’ has a vertical forehead that correlates with the enlargement of the cerebral frontal lobes of the brain. The skull of Israel Man is identical to the forehead of today’s humans. It is thus clear that the increased capacity of the vocal tract, to connect and express different symbols, was needed to produce the modern industrial tools we have today. I thus conclude that the developments of the human mind, the brain, and the vocal tract were the cause of the development of the earliest human social units.

Crelin also found that the development of the vocal tract in a human child through age six is an image of the combined development of the vocal tract of australopithecine, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, and Homo sapiens. Australopithecine walked upright. The teeth resemble our teeth. The earliest members of this specie lived about 4.4 million years ago. Interestingly, many australopithecine skulls have been found. Unfortunately, because of jaw, teeth, brain size, and age differences, australopithecine has been divided into six subspecies. Some of these subspecies used stone tools. Thus, australopithecine could have been a humanoid. If that is the case, our mind, brain, and symbolic languages have been developing for at least 4.4 million years. Unfortunately, australopithecine is not classified as a humanoid by archeologists because the brain of australopithecine is small and like the brain of a chimpanzee. However, this classification gives evolutionists opportunities to build questionable evidence for supporting the theory that humans and chimpanzees come from the same ancestor. When living species are classified with data from nonliving things, an error can be made because a living body has no mechanisms.

I argue that this classification is flawed because the natural affinities of God’s spiritual atoms (or spirits) have not been considered. Because of the natural affinities of all spiritual atoms, I argue that the early creatures did not eat each other. Instead, I argue that they ate the fruits of the plants that God made for them. Thus, I argue that creatures ate each other only after the population of some specie increases and must eat each other to survive. So, I assert that humans and the small animals ate plants for a long period of time. However, when the big animal phyla appear the limited supply of plant food might have caused the big animals to eat smaller animals and humans. When this occurred the smaller animal species had to develop sign languages to protect the members of a specie against its predators. It seems that in time, all animals had to develop sign languages. Thus, I assert that the earliest humans did not eat meat. They had no need to develop signs until they had to protect themselves from the flesh eating animals. If humans did not develop sign languages before the chimpanzees, one expects to find that the brain of australopithecine would be smaller than the brain of chimpanzees. So, I believe that australopithecine could have been a humanoid. Since there is no natural force that can stop the growth of the bigger ‘flesh-eating’ animals such as the dinosaurs, I conclude that big flesh-eating animals are always destroyed naturally with God’s Intelligent Design.

The human vocal tract has been developing for a long time and will continue to develop. Today, we see this development clearly in our entertainers. In the 1970s, I conducted research on the pattern of human voice. These patterns are known as voice prints. The voice prints of people differ and are very useful in police work. Voice prints distinguish singers from people who do no sing clearly. A voice print has four formants. The existence of four indicates that a singing quartet is a natural arrangement of singers. The formants of singers are very clear and show the quality of singers. The voice of an impressionist such as Rich Little also has four very clear formants. Accordingly, a new singer must develop his or her vocal tract. This explains why people are not born as singers, that is, by the natural selection of evolutionary theory.

Modern research on the human vocal tract shows that the production of speech is a highly complex process. The airflow inside the mouth of a human has been studied and found to be highly turbulent. For instance, miniature tornados and hurricanes are found in the mouth. The flow of air at some places in the mouth resembles the complex air flow that is observed around the most advanced and highly maneuverable modern aircraft of our Air Force. The late Dr. Herbert Teager, a friend of mine and professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, did research on the complex airflow in a human mouth. He conjectured that this complex airflow indicates that biological processes might contain cold fusion energy. According to research on the vocal tract, the mind, and brain, we still have much to learn about the mind and its organs.

The development of the mind, brain and vocal tract of humans can be seen in the 1995 French discovery of new cave paintings and engravings. The cave is dated to the Ice Age, which was about 20,000 years ago. The paintings show dynamic animals. The dynamics of these animals can be compared with the static animals that were found in older caves. What caused this change in art? The appearance of dynamic animals indicates that the minds of the artists who lived in this cave conceived something new about animals. By comparing static art forms with dynamic art forms, the mind is beginning to recognize deeper and deeper truths about the universe. This deeper truth is the difference between nonliving things and living things. These artists found something in the universe 20,000 years ago that have not been found yet by many modern scientists.

The importance of the vocal tract is seen if one conducts research on the ways a human develops speech and language. On this subject, I suggest the 19th