Jacobus Arminius Stands His Ground: A Declaration against High Calvinism
By John S. Knox, Roger J. Newell and Vic Reasoner
5/5
()
About this ebook
Having trained in Geneva under Jean Calvin's successor, Theodore Beza (1519-1605), and having further expanded and honed his theology at the University of Leyden from both lectern and the pulpit, Arminius thoroughly presented his theological views in both oral and written form. He spoke in his native Dutch language to an assembly of his peers and religious authorities with the hopes of avoiding a theological rift in Holland--while at the same time hoping to remove a long-standing conflict with the Supralapsarian faction warring against him.
Thus, Arminius' Declaration of Sentiments is a sophisticated, passionate appeal to reason, scripture, and community. With each section, Arminius seeks not only to demonstrate the error of the attacks on him, but also to point out how and why reconciliation can take place through a careful examination of various precepts of Christian thought.
John S. Knox
John S. Knox has taught History, Sociology, Bible, and Religion for over two decades at several Christian universities on the East and West coasts of America. He has a PhD from the University of Birmingham (UK) in Theology & Religion (Sociology of Religion), a MA in Sociology from Arizona State University, and a MATS in Christian History & Thought from George Fox University.
Read more from John S. Knox
But Children Matter: Successful Children’s Ministry Volunteerism Strategies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sacro-Egoism: The Rise of Religious Individualism in the West Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJohn Wesley’s 52 Standard Sermons: An Annotated Summary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeeing the Light: Evidence and Distractions of Near-Death Experiences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Blind Scientist: Unmasking the Misguided Methodology of Neo-Darwinism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeconverted: The Deconstruction and Dismantling of the Contemporary Church Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsI’m Right / You’re Wrong: The Problem of Moral Disagreement and Divine Knowledge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreedom in Christ: The Way of Truth for the Postmodern Heart Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Jacobus Arminius Stands His Ground
Related ebooks
Arminius Speaks: Essential Writings on Predestination, Free Will, and the Nature of God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTheological Authority in the Church: Reconsidering Traditionalism and Hierarchy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGrace Faith Free Will: Contrasting Views of Salvation: Calvinism & Arminianism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Understanding Assurance and Salvation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGod in Dispute: "Conversations" among Great Christian Thinkers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Evangelicals and Tradition (Evangelical Ressourcement): The Formative Influence of the Early Church Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Know the Heretics Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Apologetics in 3D: Essays on Apologetics and Spirituality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBasics of the Faith: An Evangelical Introduction to Christian Doctrine Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFor Calvinism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No!: A Theological Response to Christian Reconstructionism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPredestined to Believe: Common Objections to the Reformed Faith Answered, Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArminian and Baptist: Explorations in a Theological Tradition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJacob Arminius: The Man from Oudewater Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Classical Arminianism: The Theology of Salvation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings40 Questions About Arminianism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnlimited Atonement: Amyraldism and Reformed Theology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFree Will Revisited: A Respectful Response to Luther, Calvin, and Edwards Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Inspiration Of The Scriptures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLectures on Calvinism: Six Stone Lectures: Calvinism a Life-System, Calvinism and Religion, Politics, Science, Art & Future Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Charity and Justice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Question of Canon: Challenging The Status Quo In The New Testament Debate Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Scholarship: Two Convocation Addresses on University Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Pastoral Care Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Trinity in the Canon: A Biblical, Theological, Historical, and Practical Proposal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Antithesis between Symbolism and Revelation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCalvinism: A Biblical and Theological Critique Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Quest for Truth: Theology for Postmodern Times Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgainst Calvinism: Rescuing God's Reputation from Radical Reformed Theology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Christianity For You
Decluttering at the Speed of Life: Winning Your Never-Ending Battle with Stuff Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: Follow Them and People Will Follow You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries Updated and Expanded Edition: When to Say Yes, How to Say No To Take Control of Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mere Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Screwtape Letters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Winning the War in Your Mind: Change Your Thinking, Change Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Law of Connection: Lesson 10 from The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anxious for Nothing: Finding Calm in a Chaotic World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 5 Love Languages: The Secret to Love that Lasts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I'll Start Again Monday: Break the Cycle of Unhealthy Eating Habits with Lasting Spiritual Satisfaction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Changes That Heal: Four Practical Steps to a Happier, Healthier You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good Boundaries and Goodbyes: Loving Others Without Losing the Best of Who You Are Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Uninvited: Living Loved When You Feel Less Than, Left Out, and Lonely Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Present Over Perfect: Leaving Behind Frantic for a Simpler, More Soulful Way of Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Stories We Tell: Every Piece of Your Story Matters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Purpose Driven Life: What on Earth Am I Here For? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wild at Heart Expanded Edition: Discovering the Secret of a Man's Soul Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Book of Enoch Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Grief Observed Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Story: The Bible as One Continuing Story of God and His People Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Less Fret, More Faith: An 11-Week Action Plan to Overcome Anxiety Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Girl, Wash Your Face: Stop Believing the Lies About Who You Are so You Can Become Who You Were Meant to Be Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Good Girl's Guide to Great Sex: Creating a Marriage That's Both Holy and Hot Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries Workbook: When to Say Yes, How to Say No to Take Control of Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5NIV, Holy Bible Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bible Recap: A One-Year Guide to Reading and Understanding the Entire Bible Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Jacobus Arminius Stands His Ground
2 ratings1 review
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Knox provides for us a readable, concise, and excellent Introduction to Arminius, his theology, and the debate it engenders when compared to Calvinism. He even provides a helpful timeline of Arminius' life starting before his birth from Luther's 95 Thesis (1517) to after his death when the Remonstrants were officially recognized as a Christian church (p.11). Knox concentrates exclusively on Arminius' "Declaration of Sentiments," briefly, discussing Arminius' personal life, his cultural and theological background, and his friends and opponents. Knox then discusses with ample thoroughness, however brief, Arminius' "Declaration," reviewing each section and helping to clarify the main points: there is even provided the opinions of other scholars to Ariminius 'and critiques of both Arminius and his thesis.This is an excellent overview that would help students, both Arminian and Calvinists or those seeking to know the central debate between Arminianism and Calvinism, better understand Arminius and his thought. I recommend reading it before reading Arminius' "Declaration of Sentiments" in his "Works."
Book preview
Jacobus Arminius Stands His Ground - John S. Knox
Jacobus Arminius Stands His Ground
A Declaration against High Calvinism
John S. Knox
Foreword by Roger J. Newell
Afterword by Vic Reasoner
9880.pngJacobus Arminius Stands His Ground
A Declaration against High Calvinism
Copyright © 2018 John S. Knox. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in critical publications or reviews, no part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without prior written permission from the publisher. Write: Permissions, Wipf and Stock Publishers, 199 W. 8th Ave., Suite 3, Eugene, OR 97401.
Wipf & Stock
An Imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers
199
W.
8
th Ave., Suite
3
Eugene, OR
97401
www.wipfandstock.com
paperback isbn: 978-1-5326-3371-3
hardcover isbn: 978-1-5326-3373-7
ebook isbn: 978-1-5326-3372-0
Manufactured in the U.S.A.
January 25, 2019
Table of Contents
Title Page
Foreword
Preface
Acknowledgements
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: The Cultural Surroundings of Arminius and a Declaration
Chapter 3: Principal Characters in the Development of a Declaration
Chapter 4: Overview of a Declaration of Sentiments
Chapter 5: Detailed Analysis of a Declaration of Sentiments
Chapter 6: Scholarly Voices on a Declaration of Sentiments
Chapter 7: Reflections Upon the Man and His Manuscript
Chapter 8: Final Thoughts
Afterword
Glossary
Additional Notes on A Declaration
Bibliography
Lovingly dedicated to my favorite boss of all time,
Thomas Mostul, and his sweet wife, Eileen,
for their kind and generous support of me while in Seminary.
After the Holy Scriptures, I exhort the students to read the Commentaries of Calvin . . . I tell them that he is incomparable in the interpretation of Scripture; and that his Commentaries ought to be held in greater estimation than all that is delivered to us in the writings of the ancient Christian Fathers; so that, in a certain eminent spirit of prophecy, I give the pre-eminence to him beyond most others, indeed beyond them all. I add, that, with regard to what belongs to common places, his Institutes must be read after the Catechism, as a more ample interpretation. But to all this I subjoin the remark, that they must be perused with cautious choice, like all other human compositions."
—Jacobus Arminius¹
1. Arminius, Praestantium ac Eruditorum Virorum Epistolae Ecclesiasticae et Theologicae,
236
–
237
.
Foreword
Four centuries later, what are we to make of the rebellion of Jacob Arminius against the Calvinist orthodoxy as taught in sixteenth and seventeenth-century Holland? Should he and the Remonstrants who advocated for his views be valorized 1) as a return to the true intentions of Luther and Calvin, 2) as respecting a proper mystery surrounding the central doctrines of faith and salvation, and 3) for resisting the privileging of causal logic to deform the gospel of grace by framing it within a logically necessary primordial mechanism? Or should we censure Arminius for foolishly selling off the great Reformation treasure of salvation by God’s sovereign grace alone and returning to Rome’s halfway religion of a faith-plus-works synergy? Certainly, as Dr. Knox’s investigations report, Arminius’ views led many of his contemporaries to doubt his loyalty to the Protestant cause at the vulnerable historical moment when the Netherlands had shaken off the colonial rule of Spain with its linkage to Roman Catholic doctrine and hierarchical authority.
Readers of Arminius’ self-defense should pause to consider that such a powerful attempt at self-correction was attempted from within the heart of the Reformed tradition by someone taught directly by Calvin’s own students and younger colleagues, including Beza himself. Hence, Arminius writes his defense in a fraternal spirit, yet as one genuinely alarmed at seemingly inflexible opponents who have allowed their fears to distort the process of doctrinal analysis. In response, Arminius urgently calls the Reformed church to seek honest discussion towards reconciliation, not wishing dominion over the faith of another man but seeking to increase knowledge, truth piety peace and joy in Christ.
Yet, we also see an Arminius inconsistent in the heat of controversy, who can accuse his opponents of the worst of motives, the effect of which made reconciliation much less likely.
To his credit, Arminius engaged in these conversations and debates with an honest sense of the difference between truth and our grasp of truth. Surely a recurrent problem theology struggles with is a kind of nominalism—that is, a way of regarding concepts as identical to their referents, as if our conceptual formulations of the truth are equivalent to the truth itself as it is in Jesus Christ. But at its best, theology serves the church not by pointing to its own concepts as encapsulating the reality of God, but rather by using concepts as signposts, pointing towards the living God to whom we seek to bear faithful witness. Arminius seems to have grasped this in a way his opponents unfortunately did not.
In regards to the central issue of predestination itself, it is further to his credit that Arminius had an intuitive sense that predestination and reprobation ought never be seen as belonging together in a kind of equivalence. While the notion of equivalence is not absent in Calvin,² he also wrote more than once that the purpose of light is never to blind but to enlighten; to bring life, not to destroy it. If anyone is condemned by Christ, this can only be regarded as accidental,
as when a light shines, it also casts a shadow.³
If we could put our finger on the Calvinist misstep, it might point to the abstraction of election as a theme apart from the living agency of the Father’s Son, who took upon himself human flesh—not to condemn the world but to save it (John 3:17). To knit together predestination and reprobation as equal bearers of divine glory creates serious confusion at the heart of Christian theology. It presumes that God’s will can or ought to to be seen as primary while God’s love and mercy are secondary consequences or arbitrary choices. C. S. Lewis has noted how this created for the second generation of Reformers very dark answers to the question of how we are to think of those who have not responded to God’s gracious invitation. By raising God’s sovereign will to choose as the primary divine attribute, it depicts God as willing to have eternally hated some as to have loved others. That grim portrayal is why in its victory over Arminius the older Protestant orthodoxy helped dig its own grave, albeit unintentionally, for the Enlightenment culture which followed was unable to grasp the original power of the doctrine, finding it either cruel or absurd.⁴
However, a critical question must also be addressed to Arminius and the Remonstrants. Did their solution—to ground the doctrine of predestination upon divine foreknowledge—really resolve Calvinism’s dilemma? Or did it lead to obscuring the real significance of the doctrine and give human agency an unfortunate center stage? Did it not replace the electing God with electing man? Or, in the language of modern American evangelicals, did not our decision for Christ increasingly eclipse God’s decision for us as the focus of preaching? In retrospect, did either Arminius or his opponents truly find a way to recover and represent the biblical significance of election?
But the story did not end with Arminius. He was just the beginning of Reformed orthodoxy’s attempts at self-correction. In the years that followed, another historic seat of Reformed orthodoxy—Scotland, would become the scene of fierce controversies to which names such as Thomas Boston, Samuel Rutherford, and John McCleod Campbell all testify, with Campbell being deposed from the ministry of the Church of Scotland in 1831. It seems then that while the Reformed tradition has a remarkable capacity for being self-critical, it has lacked the ability to reach consensus on reform. The centuries leading to our present moment have seen too many divisions, especially in the United States where separation and the withdrawal from association has become a mark of true piety.
These historic controversies still matter today because Arminius remains a favorite target for a newly assertive Calvinism. But rather than engage in a further round of theological pugilism, Dr. Knox’s goal is not to argue for some kind of victory, but to get to the heart of Arminius, or to change the metaphor, to sift carefully the wheat from the chaff of his arguments, to honestly acknowledge both strengths and weaknesses. Hopefully, these essays will contribute to an emerging conversation within the Reformed family, one marked by careful listening to the intentions of a theologian’s heart in the