87 min listen
Napoleon the Great? A debate with Andrew Roberts, Adam Zamoyski and Jeremy Paxman
Napoleon the Great? A debate with Andrew Roberts, Adam Zamoyski and Jeremy Paxman
ratings:
Length:
65 minutes
Released:
Sep 21, 2017
Format:
Podcast episode
Description
How should we remember Napoleon, the man of obscure Corsican birth who rose to become emperor of the French and briefly master of Europe? In 2014, as the 200th anniversary of the Battle of Waterloo approached, Intelligence Squared brought together two of Britain’s finest historians to debate how we should assess Napoleon’s life and legacy. Was he a military genius and father of the French state, or a blundering nonentity who created his own enduring myth? Was his goal of uniting the European continent under a common political system the forerunner of the modern ‘European dream’? Or was he an incompetent despot, a warning from history of the dangers of overarching grand plans? Championing Napoleon was historian Andrew Roberts, author of, among other books, 'Napoleon the Great', 'Napoleon and Wellington', and 'Waterloo: Napoleon's Last Gamble'. Opposing him was fellow historian Adam Zamoyski, author of, among other books, '1812. Napoleon's Fatal March on Moscow' and 'Rites of Peace. The Fall of Napoleon and the Congress of Vienna'. For information regarding your data privacy, visit acast.com/privacy
Released:
Sep 21, 2017
Format:
Podcast episode
Titles in the series (100)
Nate Silver On The Art And Science Of Prediction: Nate Silver is the 35-year-old data engineer and forecaster with superstar status. He shot to fame in 2008 for correctly predicting the outcome in 49 out of 50 states in the US presidential election. In 2012, when most media pundits and political analy... by Intelligence Squared