#_

A5

.1

.2

.3 ( 22)

12

.6

22

.1:




" "

.
:
Employee Research \ Staff Research


.

1.1
.

.

.
1.1


( ) ( ( ) 1)




.
( )
.

.1

.
1.1 (: )1
( :)In-Depth Interviews-IDI's ( )


.
( )Focus Groups Discussions - FGD



.

()


% 22 .

.
12 6


.



- .

-1 (.) 1
-2 .
-3 :
.
-2 ( :) 2


.
- -5
(.) 3

.
2 ( )3.22 .
3
( ) .

1.1 (: )1
2.2.1 (: )Face to Face

.
2.2.2 (:)Telephonic

.
2.2.3 ( )2 ()Self-completion
(
) :


:

:



.

-1
( )1
.
-2 -
-


.



.
( )

()2

.


(
"" :


)
.

( )1( )social desirability bias SDB

( )2
(
)




.
:
-1 (( ))
-2 (
)
-3 :

-2 ()Organization Health Index
1

( )compensation error

.

9.6 ( )Rotation :

10

-5 .
-6

.
-7 1
( :
)
.

.

1 ( :
" "

11

.3 ( )



()1 ()%22
:
.



( )Peter Schreyer
%52 .

Peter Schreyer

1 ()2221 Hey group

12

(
) ( )1 :



.
( )Hey







.

1 ( )Synovate
.

13

1.1 -1-
" IBM 52



%22 IBM

.1
1.1 -1-
American Century Investments
- -


".

() 2

]http://yhareb.com/wp/?p=428 [Visited on 11th Sep 2012

2 .

14

.
1.1 :




.
(.)1
(
)

.

15

.
1.4




( )



.
* Peter Goudge (2006) : .

16

1.5


.

.

1..






()

.

17

1.3
:
. . .




.
1.3

(
)

()
% 75
%65

18

% 02
% 22 .
1.3
( )

.

%22
%22


.


.

19

1.11
-1 :
( )
( .
)12
.
-2 :

.
-3

.
-2 .
-5
1

() 1

( )








.

20

1.11 :

() :
-1 ( )

.
-2

.
-3 :

...
-2






.

21

-5


.
-6 -


.
-7 () : )Peter Goudge (2006


.
-0 ( )





.

22

1.11 :


:
-1 :

.
-2 :


.
-3 :

( )



( )
15.
-2 ( )Benchmarks

.

23

1.11
( )



.
1.14




( )conversionModel
()TNS
) TRI*M High Performance Organization(HiPO
) )IPSOS (TNS (


:
http://directory.esomar.org
.

.
24

( 1.15 (Benchmarks ) )1




( )Benchmarks
.





--
---

.

25

1.1. ( )1 :

.1 :

.
.2 :

.
.3 :
12 12
:


!!
.


1

( )
" "

26

.
.2 :





.
.5 :
(
)

.
.5 :



27

.

.


: " "

""



:
-1

( )3
(. )2
-2 ( ) ( .).
.6:


.

28

.7 :


.
1.13 ( )






( )Yammer.com


.

.
:

29

1.13
[Cross Tab Analysis] -1
()


:



:

.
]Key Driver Analysis[ -2
()Weight
()
: %22


152.
30

:[Correlation Analysis] -3


152
.
) 1( ]Firmographics segmentation[ -2

*Firmographics

:






[.]Cluster Analysis

(
...

31

222 ( )segment segment
segment
222
022 ...
1.13

32

1.13 :




!!
()Benchmark


2
.

:

"

"

(.) 1

(: *
)


:

: :

33

:
" (.) 1

.
1.11













.

2272

34

.
:
2
2212 6026
.
.

35

1.11 (:)Employee Engagement Index

.

() 1

. . ( ) - : .
. . .

(
)

The Drivers of Employee Engagement. Robinson D, Perryman S , Hayday S

Report 408, Institute for Employment Studies, April 2222

36

.1.11 :

(: )1
. . ( ...) . ( ...) . . ( ) .
....
. . . ( ...) .


( ) ()3.16
.
ESOMAR Handbook of Market and Opinion Research 4th edition Chapter 26
[Employee research Ruth McNeil].

37

()




( 5 ) 0

.
:
.

7

99

38

99

:
.

() 1

( )life/work balance
.
. .
. ( ). . . -

(.) 2

. .
. . .
- .

)(1

.
2

39

) ..
. . . .
. . ( :
.)
( ...)
.
. - .

() 2

:
.
1

.
2
.

40

:


()


.

41

..
:
1- Peter Goudge (2006) - Employee Research: How to Market
Research Society (MRS)
2- Mark Murphy [accessed Sep 2012] Why 5 Point Scales Dont
Work (and other problems with employee surveys) [Online]
http://www.leadershipiq.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/01/Why_5_Point_Scales_Dont_Work.pdf

3- The Drivers of Employee Engagement. Robinson D, Perryman S

, Hayday S Report 408, Institute for Employment Studies, April
2004
4- ESOMAR Handbook of Market and Opinion Research 4th
edition Chapter 26 [Employee research Ruth McNeil].
5- Article 7 Ways to Increase Response Rates on Employee
Surveys [Online] http://www.custominsight.com/employeeengagement-survey/employee-survey-response-rates.asp
[Visited on 9th Sep 2012]
[Online] -6
http://yhareb.com/wp/?p=428 [Visited on 11th Sep 2012]

.......................................

.......................................

42

:
1225 1602. . ( ) .
Synovate 2220 2211 2211
Synovate Ipsos Ipsos
.2212
21 2212 . . :

m.sbeai@gmail.com

http://twitter.com/msbeai

http://sa.linkedin.com/in/almohannadalsbeai

| 2212

43