: :

info@alamelgawda.com
: :
szahrani@alamelgawda.com
@salzahrani2
:
editor@alamelgawda.com
:
:
:
:
:
/
:
:
:
:
: /



:

/

/
00201002430542
admin@profarabhost.com
gamy2430@gmail.com

,
,
,

.

:

.1

.2

.3

.4

.

,
.

www.altaknyia.com

7----------------------------------------------
8----------------------------------------------
10---------------------------------------
13--------------------------------------
15------------------------------
16-------------------------------------------------
19-----------
20---------------------------------------
24------------------------
( ) 26-------------------------
30-----------------------------------------
38-------------------------------------
40--------------------
41----------------------------------------------
42-------------------------------------------------
47--------------------------------
48--------------------------------
50-------------------------------------
( ) 52--------------------------------
54---------------------------------
55---------------------------------------------
( Deming ) 57--------------------
59---------------------------------------------------
61------------
62----------------------------------------
64--------------------------------------------
66------------------------------
77-------------------------------------
84-------------------------------------------------------

:
.
.1

.2
.

.3

.

.4


.

.5

.

.6
word 10
16 .


.
.7

.8
.

.9

.

.10

info@alamelgawda.com



http://www.alamelgawda.com

,
, 24 2010 2010.

( )

.1

.3

.2
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9

.10

.




.



.

: Plan

.

:Do


.

00201008415359 :
www.altaknyia.com

:Check



:
.

.

.

:Act



.

 ( )

.
....
.......

1717
1818

1919
2020
2121
2222
2323


2424

1.1

2525

2.2

2626

3.3
:
4.4
5.5
6.6
:
7.7
8.8
9.9
1010

1111
1212

1313

1414
1515
1616

00201008415359
info@alamelgawda.com

2020 ,

,


.

,


.
4.4



2020.
5.5






.


.

2.2


.
3.3

3.3

.
4.4


.
5.5




.
6.6



.
7.7




.




.

:

1.1




.

,


.

:

:
1.1

.

,

,

,

.

2.2

2013

4
8

8
2013

14

10

14

15

11

16

12

17
http://www.boswtol.com/politics/egypt-pictures/10/july/2217336/

2013

:


:





.
1974 11

.

2.2


(
ISO IEC ITU CEN CENELEC
COPANT
)

3.3

( -
-
- )

-
- :

:
.

1.1

:

.

10

:

.

:




.

:

.

.
(
)13 .2010

www.ifan.org
2013

World Standards Day Message

Message No. 43
14 October 2012
Less waste, better results
Standards increase efficiency

43
14 2012

IEC

ISO ITU
.

International standards such as those from IEC, ISO

and ITU are crucial for increasing efficiency. This
issue has come to the forefront as global challenges
like sustainability and financial uncertainty mean
that organizations are challenged to achieve better
results with less waste.

Quite simply, efficiency indicates the ability to

achieve objectives by implementing processes to
develop products or services of optimal quality
with minimal waste, expense, or unnecessary
effort. It helps organizations maximize profits
and meet their goals, and is crucial for success
in todays challenging and competitive economic
environment.

In todays highly competitive and complex

world, the issue of sustainability, viewed from an
economic, environmental and societal perspective
means that businesses must be more efficient
across a wide range of measures and issues.

2013

11

International standards are powerful tools for

helping organizations capitalize their potential
in the global marketplace. Developed by experts
from around the world, they contain internationally
harmonized best practice which can be used to
measure, compare and increase efficiency and
reduce waste

For example, by providing common specifications,

international standards enable products, services
and technology from different vendors to fit
together like pieces in a puzzle. They support
interoperability and compatibility, providing
a solid base for developing innovations and
facilitating market access to new products. They
ensure that countries, organizations, regulators
and researchers, do not have to reinvent the wheel,
and can invest in other priorities.

.


.

The state-of-the-art know-how contained in

international standards is accessible to all,
including developing countries, helping them
make the best use of their human and material
resources. More efficient industrial and business
processes, facilitated by standards, empower
companies to compete globally, and produce faster
for more markets at a lesser cost.

.
-

-
.

In this way, standards help organizations meet

their customers needs while focusing and
optimizing company processes. Regulators
can use international standards as a means to
show compliance and as a base for market- and
consumer-friendly regulations. And consumers
can rest assured that international standards
promote efficiency on issues that matter to them,
like product labeling or safety.

.


.

The bottom line? International standards from

IEC, ISO and ITU not only make good business
sense, but greater efficiency helps society to make
better use of its resources, contributing to a more
sustainable world.

2013

12


..

. :


..
14 2012

.

14 2012



.




.

.
, .
.

2013

13

.







.

.


1970

.
14
1946 26
.

10 170 .








.

( .
)
.
.
.

.
:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-5YMboWs6c
:

14

2013

27 2012

( )

()

) (Sida 4 (-2011
)2014
ISO 26000


)(MENA

.

2011





()2014 -2012


.

).. -7055
)2009/1

ISO 26000

.

26000 .

.
:

2013

15


(
)
Visual Management
.
(
)Lean Management
) ( Low Cost Management
)(Visual Management


.

.1

Visual Management & Transparency

16

Transparency
International 1993

.
Transparency




:


.
"

".

.

"



{
:

} ..


.
:




.

.2

Visual Management & Philosophy of

Kaizen




.

(
)
.








. (
).



()



.

.

2013







.


.

.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.

.





.

.




.

(
).

.3

. 4

Basic PrinciplesVisual Management

of

: (Good Communication
/



.

: :
Seeing is
believing

% 80
. :

. 260

:
:
/ 5

: ( ):

5S
.

(
)


.

.5

Visual Management (Benefits of
)Application

:



.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

Basic ConceptsVisual Management

of

( )

(
) ....

: :

.

.
.

.6

2013

17


:
.

.

.
.

( )

.
.

.
:
(
)
-4 :
.
.
:
.
.

:
1.1 Gantt Chart


.
2.2 :
.
3.3 .
4.4
.
5.5
.
6.6 :
.
7.7 .
8.8

18

9.9
.

.7

7.7
.
:

Visual Workplace

.





.



.

.


.

.

.
.

:
1.1 .
2.2 .
.
3.3
.
4.4 .




.
5.5 .
6.6




.

1.1
2.2
3.3 .
( 27
.)1429 .12972
4.4 ( . 2007 23).
.Visual Management
()
.
- .
5.5
. (
)
.
6.6 Visual Workplace
. .
2008 1.
Gemba Research, Visual7.7
Management.
Available at:
URL: http://www.gemba.com/ Access
August 12, 2008

2013

-

-

( )
.

:
i.i
.
iiii

.

.


,

.

( ).


.

.



,
:

.


.


.


.

:

(
, )proficiency tests

(
,) Methods Performance tests

. ) )Material tests

( )
.

,
.

1.1 ,
, 2009, .

1.1

Interlaboratory
Studies

2.2
.2003

,

()
,

,
.

3.3 ,
, 2009, .

iiiii

iviv

v.v

2.2
Interlaboratory
Comparison



,

, ,
,
.

4.4

17025 . 2005

2013

19

Process Analysis Tools

.

:

.
.
.



.

.

-5 Decision

( ) .
()
.
.

-6 Manual
operation

-1 Flow Chart

.


.
.

-7 Daley

-1 Start - End

-8 Manual input

-2 Data Storage

-9 Data

.
.

.

.
.

.
.
.


.
.

.

. .

-3 Process

-10 collect

-4 document

20

2013



.



.

.


.
.

.

.

( ) .

.


.

.
.

.

-2 Flow Process
chart

.

:

l

.

.

.

.

:

.
.

. .

.

.

.
( ).

.

.
.

.


.


.
.



.

.
.
.

-3 () Swim
Lane Flowchart


.

.
.

.
.
.
D

.


.

.

.
.

.

.
.


.



.

:

.

.

.

.
.

2013

21


.

.
.

.


.

.


.

:

.

.

.
.

-4

Workflow or Spaghetti Diagram

.

.

.




.

.

.

.

() .

.


.

:
.

22

.
Group Technology

.

.


.

.

.

:

.


.

.
.


.
.

.


.











.

2013

:


.
.

.

.







.

.

.

.
.
.

-5 Worker and Machine

Diagram

.

.
.
.
.

.


.


.


.

.


.
.


.

.

.

-6 Two Hand Process Chart

.

.



.



.

:

.


.
.25%

:

.

.

.



.

.


.

.

.

.


.

:
:
Edraw

Two Hand Process Chart

Max

Smart

Flow Chart .... Mind Tools

Draw

Flow
Yed

Process Analysis Tools

Charting
Flow Chart- Wikipedia
Graph Editor

2013

23

.


.

Tito Conti
Mohamed ZAIRI




) (Excellence Award
( .)EFQM

JURAN
()BPM

(.)BPM

/.


- .

.

(
).

:

.


.

/


.

. ( /
)


.
(

/)

.


.

.

: .
- - (:)PDCA

.

.

( ).

:

24

Plan

/




.

DO


.

Check

( )

2013

Act
.

.

.

/


.

.



.

:



.


( ).

:

-1 () - .

.




.

-2 ( -
)
.-3 ( -
)
.
.

)
.
:

.

.

.

( )

( ).

:
.

.

2013

25

The System of Profound knowledge
( )
: /
SPC


.









.

/


/


.

/ 1950

/


. /

. /


.
.
/
( The System of
) Profound knowledge

.
( ) -:

knowledge of a system
-1
-2 knowledge of variation
-3 Theory of knowledge
-4 knowledge of psychology

.



.

.


.
.



-:

26

knowledge of a system

/

(
) .

.11.1 Defining The System

/ (

)

.


-:
1.1 (
, ,
)
2.2 (
,
, )
3.3 ( ,
)
4.4 (
)



.
.


2013




.

(
)
,

,

,

.




..



/

(
)
.

,


, .




.
( )
,

,

.


.

-1-2 The Aim of a System

( )



.
/

.
/



/


/
-


.

-:
1.1
2.2

3.3

4.4
.
5.5 .
.

1 1-3 Boundaries Of a System

( ) -:
Defining The
Boundaries Of a System
Defining The Aim

-: Defining The
Boundaries Of a System

.

,
.


.



.
/




. /
.

2013

27

-: Defining The Aim

.


.



.



.



.

.






,







.

.

28

.

.
( Defining your basic business is
one key to setting the aim of the
.) system.

,
.






.

-1-4 Optimize The System

.
.


.

-:

1.1






2.2
.


.

.
3.3

,




.

.


.

4.4



.


5.5
.
2013


6.6

.

.
7.7


.
8.8






.
9.9
.

1010

-1-5 Initial steps

-:
-1


,
.

.
.
-2 ,


.


.
.


,

.
-3 ,


.

.
-4


,

-5

,

,
.

/




.







.
.

2013

29

:



.
( )
( )
( ) 50 .


1432-1431
:
-1
:



.
-2
:


.
Abstract of study:
The study aimed to the objective of the new study aims to identify
the abilities of practicing the whole quality of administration in
the Saudi schools abroad and to be aware of the major difficulties
which prevent from applying the quality of administration in the
Saudi schools abroad, concerning educational administration and
the teacher regarding the individuals .
The study society consists of all the officials (the all educational
supervisors, teacher). The study sample comprised of all the
original study society individuals (comprehensive sample) the total
number (50) people.
To answer the study questions and actualize its goals the
researcher prepared the following studys tool which comprised of
two aspects, The study held in the first term 14311432-H.
The study reached to many results, the importance ones are:
1-There are many obstacles regarding the educational
administration, which constrain quality implementation in the
general education, the main as following: encouragement system
weakness and effective work motivations qualified cadres in
quality administration is not available centralization in taking

30

decisions unfairly using financial resources shortage in

technology and information administration weakness in change
directing curricular exerting responsibilities accreditation is not
available.
2-There are many obstacles regarding the teacher which constrain
the quality implementation in general education as following:
teachers disinclination of training programs attendance a teacher
is not a capable to appoint the modern technological in teaching
teachers weakness of evaluation and its styles tools teachers
weakness in effective communication with students teacher isnt
satisfied of his educational job.

:

...


.



.

(1422) ( )Deming

( )Huang ( )Langfords
( )Deming
( )EDGECUMBEHIGH 5 6

.
Total Quality Management



(2002
)204
:
.

2013


.



14312010/

( )15 -0 ()41.9%



.

.
(1420 1425 -
)122

.



( )Deming
( )Crosby


.
:

(1416 )423




.
(1994 )39


.





.

,




..






.
( 2002 )316

.
( )20







.

(1993) ( 1998)




( )
.






.






:


:
:1


:2


: : 3

: :4

: :5

:
:
-1
-2.
.
-3

.

2013

31


-4


.

:
:
-1
.
-2

.
-3
.
-4
.
-5
.
:
:
-1 :

(
) ( )
-2 :
( )

1431 1432- .
:
: (2002 )66

.
:

.
: ( 1999 .)103
: ( 1999 .)103
( :)Total Quality Management
(1999 .)103
(1422 )12 :






.
:

32

.
: .
: ( )20



( )36 1418/2/25

.
:
:
.
:

50
)10( -: )40( ( 1431) .
.
:


( )50 ()10
( )40 .
:

,
.

()2
, ( )21
.
( ) 1

09

09

18

:

,
(
,

( )13 :



.

2013


( )18 :
-1 .
-2
:
( )9-1
(. )18-10
-3 ,
( - - -
)
:
,

( )35 ,

. Alpha Cornpach
( ) 2
( = ) 50

1 5

08

16%

6 10

20

40%

11 15

08

16%

15

14

28%

50

100%

15
11 15 14 08
( )28%( )16% .

.
:
( ) 5

0.84

00

00%

0.94

50

100%

18

0.89

50

100%

( )2
(. )0.89
:

1432/1431 ( )
.
:
()3

04

8%

43

86%

01

2%

()

02

4%

50

100%

43
86% .


.
:
( ) 4

() 50

100%


.
:

SPSS -:
:
-1

.

-2
.
( ) : .
-3
T-TEST .
-4
.
( : )Anova
-5

( ) .
:


:
:


( ) 3 : 1999

2013

33



( Deming
)

( ) Deming
(
) 45 : 2004
:
(
) ( )

.
:


.
( ) TQM (
) Barton,Joan ,1991
:
( ) Juran :




.
.
.
. :
-1
.
-2
( . ) 15: 2005




( ( ) Rhodes , 1992 :16 1994 ) 15 :
( ) Graham Gibbs ,1992 (
..
.. ..

..


)

.. (
)


( ) 12: 1997 ,

.
( 2003 ) 17 :
( ) :

.

.



( . 2003 ) 34 :
:
:
.

.
.
.
.

.
.

( . 2003 ) 17-15 :

:
.

.

.
.

(. 2004 . ) 20-19 :
:
:






.
()6

34

2013

33

16

01

39

11

41

06

01

02

28

15

04

03

10

36

02

02

09

39

01

01

4.12

22

25

02

01

4.36

0.662

25

23

01

01

4.44

0.643

42

08

4.84

4.62

0.602

4.78

0.418

4.72

0.701

4.36

0.875

4.08

0.633
0.520

0.370

4.13

( )6 ( )4.84 ( )4.12
( ) ( )4 :
, , , ,
()4.84( , )4.72( , )4.78( , )4.62 .
() ( )5 : ,
, , , ,
( )4.44( , )4.36( , )4.12( , )4.08(, )4.05( , )4.36 .

() (.)4.13
( )4
: , , ,

(1994

, .
( )84,7% ()15,3 .
( )
(.. )165 2000
:




()7

42
43
44
39

1
2
3
4

41

47

12

36

02

4.16

0.61

4.04

0.66

4.10

0.54

4.14

0.40
0.69
0.49

10

34

04

02

09

38

02

01

08

41

01

10

32

06

02

4.00

12

36

02

4.20

2013

35


40
45

7
8

10

30

09

37

02

04

46
9

18

02
12

06

10

4.40

0.49

4.06

0.61

2.88

1.31

4.78

( )7 ( )4.40 ( . )2.88
() ( )9 : ,
, , ,
, , , ,
, ( )2.88( , )4.06( , )4.40( , )4.20(, )4.00( , )4.14( , )4.10( , )4.04( , )4.16 .
()
(.)4.78
( ) (
)
... () 2005
. ( 2002 )
.
() ( ) .
:

()8

()

7.876

1.969

8.170

.000

10.844

45

.241

18.720

49

6.489

1.622

8.011

45

.178

14.500

49

9.112

.000

()
, .
:

()9

36

8.809

10.011

45

18.820

49

5.956

6.044

45

12.000

49

()

2.202
9.899

.000

.222

1.489
11.085

.000

.134

2013


()
, : .
:

()10

00

1.4200

0.4985

50

4.5800

0.4985

00

1.4600

0.4989

50

4.4000

0.4948

( )
64.957

62.870

( ) 10
() .
-:
-1
:
-
.
-2
:
.
(1996) (2000) (2002)
:
.
.
.
.
.


:
-1 ( )78
1993.
-2 (1422)
.
-3 (.)50
1414 .
-4
1998 .
-6 (1422) .
.
-7 ( .) . : .
-8 (2003) . .
-9 2003 .
-10
1423 .

2013

37

:
()1

( ).

()8

()2



.
()3


.
()4


.
()5


..

.
()6


..
.
()7

38

()9


..
.

.
()15







.

()10

()16

()11




.
()12

..

.
()13


.
()14

()17


.
()18




.
()19




2013




.
()20





.
()21




.
()22


.
()23




.
()24

.



.







.
()25




.
()26

( ..
.).

()27

()35

(
)




.
.

()28





.
()29


.



.
()30





.
()31

.
()32


.
()33

()34

()36

(
)
.


.
()37



(
)
... .

.
()38



.
()39





.

(
)

.

2013

39

: .

N N_X,,2_X,1_X ,
. ()

:

:
.

, ( ) :
() , .
= :

.

:
()

( ) :
()

.

40

2013

:
:

International organization
)for standardization
1947 .
130

.
1987 ( )ISO9000






1994
.
( ) ISO



) . ( EIC




.




,
( ) ,
.



.


.

,
.
:



9001 . 2008
.

.


( )9001 . 2008

.

.
:

.

:


2008/9001

- :

1.1
2.2
.
.
3.3
.
4.4 .
5.5
.
6.6 .
7.7

:
:

( ).
3.3
.
4.4


9001 . 2008
:

:

1.1
.
2.2 .
3.3 (
)
4.4 ( )
5.5 (
).
6.6 .
7.7 (
).
8.8 (
)

:
1.1 .
2.2
.
3.3
.

,



.

1.1
.
2.2
/

2013

41

-
Quality Control - The Basic Tools and Their Applications in Manufacturing and
Services

:

( )Total Quality Management
( )The Seven Basic Quality Tools
( )Quality Control
(.)Manufacturing and Services

()e-Learning

( )Power Point Presentations


( )Excel


.

.

.

.

(Statistical
)Process Control
( )Process Capability .
(Quality
)Management (The Seven
)Basic Quality Tools
(.)Continuous Process Improvement


( )step by step


.
( )The Magnificent Seven
:

42

(Continuous Process
)Improvement (. )Business Excellence
:
. .
1992

( )1996-1992 ( )2001-1996 ()2001

( .)2009-2001

1992
.1987

( )2001-1993
( )2007-2006
.



.

.


.

http://faculty.uoh.edu.sa/m.aichouni :

2013


..

( )

27

.


.

25

6 .




27
.

10 3 5
2




60



.
2 2012
:

100
30
150


.

.
: 29 2012



27 - 26


.




.
2020-2013
.





.

.




.

: 28
2012

44

2013


.


.

.

.
.
( / ) 2012
: -
- - .

...

:

.

.
.

.

.
.

.
.
.
.



.

.

.

.

100

. 50

.
23

.
.

.

.

175 :

- :

()

.





700

.
.

.

.



.


.

2013

45



:

. .

.

.

.




.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.


.

3495 :
( )
-

3495


.

( )38 12
110

.
360

682
.



.


.
2012-12-03 :

.
.

.


.

.


.

.
.

-
-.
/ .2011

46

2013

(
)330 2000

.1 .


.2

,
.
.3

.4


.

.5

.6

.7

.
.8
.
.9 .
10
.

2013

47

.



.

OHSAs,ISO14001,ISO9001
18001


( )
Labora Good GLP
( Practice tory

( ) -
) :
( ) - .
:

.1

.2

.3
.
.4


.
48

.5

.6
.

.7

.
:

-1

.

-2
.

-3

.

-4
.

-5

.

-6
.

-7

First expire first our
(
out First in First
FIFO

-8

safety material
data sheet
MSDS
operating standard
-9
SOP procedure

work WI
instructions

.

-10

:
.
-1
.
-2

-3

-4
.

-5

.
.
-6


-7

-8

-9

2013

: .

:
*

*

*
.
: :

( )

:
.
*
*

50

*
* .
:
.1

.
.2 :

( : )

()4 :

.
( :
) ( )28 :

.



.
:
.3



( :

) ( .)148 :



( :

) (.)265 :

( :

)()27 :

.4 :

.


- -

.



( :

) ()33 :

.
:
:

( )

To have

or to be

:
* .

.
*

2013


1 :





.

:
.2

( :

) (.)55 :

:
:

( :

) ( )14 :

)

( :
()22 :

( :



) (( )256 :
) ()22 21 :
....

2013

51

( )

: - 2005-5

(

Equity
-

(
)13 .
( )
Measures QL 8 The :
1.1 good Feeling
2.2 Satisfaction Life
3.3 Happiness
4.4 Fulfillment Need
5.5
time leisure and work Family
6.6 Satisfaction
relations personal with
7.7 realization Life
8.8 Objective
factors


-:
1.1 Housing
environment living and
2.2
services health and Health
3.3 Education
4.4 and Employment
conditions working
5.5
networks social and Family
6.6 use Time
7.7 Social
publicservices and capital
8.8
resources Economic
9.9 assessment Self :
actualization Mental
actualizationSpiritual
search The

52

meaning of
-:
1.1
.
2.2
.
3.3

.
-:
1.1 out Stress
2.2
overloaded and Tense
3.3 .
4.4 .
5.5 .
6.6
7.7
.
8.8
.
9.9 pain.
1010 Fear
.
1111 ( ).
1212
.

-:
.
1.1 .
2.2 .
3.3.
4.4 .
5.5

.
-:
-1 .

( ).

.

.
.
- 2
.

.
.
.
.
.

-3
.

.

.

-4 .
Two party deal
-:

.
.
.
.

.

.

.

.
-:





-:

2013


PREVENTIVE

CORRECTIVE

ASSESSMENT

Impact studies -

- Repair

- Physical

PERSONAL

Relief -

Tradeoffs
Responsibilities fromcradle to grave

Tools

- Mental Emotional

)(internal

(Re-) Training

Spiritual -

ASSESSMENT :

-


.
ACTION CORRECTIVE





.
ACTIONPREVENTIVE :








.




( )


.

a there Is
?all it to meaning

()

7.7



.

1.1



.

(1.
.
) .
2.2
2.2 (
(

)
) (.)13


3.3 (

)

(.)23
.
4.4 (

3.3
)

(.)18

.
5.5 (

4.4
)

(.)27
.
5.5

.
6.6


.

2013

53

.
.

/7 18670/ 27/11/1420
.

54

- -

2013

-:

..

Feigenbaum .V Armand

. ..

- :

1922

( )1958-1968

()1961-1963

)CEO(

.

- :

.
!!
-:

.

( Qual
)costs ity

() .

.



/

.
:


.
1.1

(Total
)Control Quality
(
)Management Quality Total
/

5.5

.

()plant hidden

8.8

2.2
.

3.3

.

4.4
.

.
9.9

.



.

(
-
.)ASQs -
- 1965

.ASQs -
-

.
-

.

-

.
-
.

.
-
-
.

.

-

-
.

6.6
.

7.7
.
.

2013

55

( Deming )
. /

W. Edwards Deming

-1900( W. Edwards Deming

)1994 50

Deming

Feigenbaum , Juran
Deming
( )1

. Statistical Thinking




Deming
Shigeiti Mariguti
Sizatura Mishibori
Toshiba

Associates


.

Deming

(
)

.1960

Deming
Deming

1993 www.

deming.org
Deming

Out Of Crisis
The New Economics For Industry,
Government, Education
:

(

)) (

94%

) .




.
Systematic

( )PDCA

. Shewhart

Deming




:

( . )PDCA

2.2 ( ) .
3.3 .
.1 Deming :

Shewhart



(
)
()2
:


() . Plan
() . Do

() . Check



() ( Act (. ))1-2
Deming


(
)()SDCA
.

1.1 Deming

2013

57


.2 ( ) :








()3
:
1.1 /


()
.
2.2







.
3.3

.

4.4

.
5.5





.
6.6
.
7.7




.

8.8

58

.
9.9

.
1010

Zero
Defects


(

) .
1111


.
1212


( )
.
1313
.
1414

.
.3 : 1986






World-Class
Quality Deming


Deming

( )


:




.

.






.


.



(
)

.

Excessive Medical Costs




.

.

Deming

Deming

Deming

.

2013

.
:
1.1 :

.



.
2.2
:

..

.
.
3.3 :
.
..



.

.
4.4 :

..

.
5.5 :


..


.
:

:
1.1 .
2.2
.
3.3 .
4.4 .
5.5 .

.


.

:
1.1 :

.
2.2 :



.

:

3.3 :



.
( )SWOT

.
4.4 :

.

.


.
5.5 :

.


.


.
:

2013

59

:
1.1 .
2.2 .
3.3 .
4.4 .
5.5 .

..


.

..
:
1.1 :
..
..



:

2.2 :
..
..

..


.
3.3 :
..
..


..

.
4.4 :

..
..

60

..
.
5.5 :



..
.

.
:
:
1.1 .
2.2
.
3.3
.
4.4
.
5.5 .
6.
7.

.

8.

9.

10.

11.
:
12.
1313
1.1 : ..
..
:
.
.

.

.
.
2.2 : ..
..
:
.
.

.

.
3.3 : ..
..
:

.

.
.

.

.

4.4:
.. ..
:
.
.
.
.

.
5.5 : ..
. :
.
.

.

.

.
:


. :
1.1.
2.2.
3.3.
4.4.
5.5.

2013

!!!

..

: ( )

( )

..
:



:

:

...
:

: ...

..

!!

( )

....
411 (

)

1932

2013

61

:
( )

:

.. ...
!


..

{.. } { } { } .....
.. .

-1
10

!!
( )
2 ( )

!
( )*

3
..
...
*
*

..

4 ! !!!

!!!!!!

( 5 )

6
..

..

62

( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
: ( )

( )
( )
( )
:
( )
( )
( )
( )

...

.

.
...

80%

4.6

.


.

...

.
...

.

...

2013

:
:
:
:

:
:

.. ..

....


.. ..

.....
.. ..


.....

.. ..

.....

.. ..

....
.. ..

....
.. ..

....
.. ..

.....

..

..

.. ..
..
.. ..

.. ..

!!!!
!!!!

..
!!!!
..
!!!!
.. ..
!!! ..

, ..


..
..
!! .. ..

..

90 .. .. 30 , ..

, ...
, !!

, 3 , , 20-30%
..

, ,

,
..

..

!!
.. 90 ,
:
, .. 3 , : ,

:
, ..

!!!! .. : , ... :

.. , , !!
, .. : .. , .. , ..
.. , , .
, ..

2013

63

2012

64

2013

,



.

126


( )109 .

-

.
: - -

- -
( )
-
The Impact of Using Modern Training Methods on
Training Program Efficiency
(A Field Study on Jordan Applied University
College of Hospitality & Tourism Education

Hayel Falah Al-Serhan (Ph.D. Student, Business

)Admin., Faculty of Economics, Teshreen Univ.

:
-

.
-


.

66

ABSTRACT
The future of tourism development and its progress in
Jordan mainly depends on the efficiency and effectiveness
of tourism and hotel education. Education and learning
are considered the human efficiencies supported with
professional knowledge and skills that fulfill current and
future tourism market requirements. This is met with a
clear strategy to develop human resources in tourism
and hotel fields. Where interested youth are qualified
and trained, which leads to developing this significant
economic sector which is expected to lead the Jordanian
economy and to have a significant role in the future.

2013


This study aimed to discuss the impact of using the
modern training methods on the efficiency of training
programs at the Jordan Applied University College of
Hospitality and Tourism Education (JAUCHTE). This
is, to investigate the significance of the modern training
methods in the training process, know the extent of
applying these methods by (JAUCHTE), point out
the contribution of these methods in the success and
efficiency of the training program, the criteria adopted
by (JAUCHTE) to select the modern training methods,
the obstacles hindering the application of these methods
by (JAUCHTE).
The society of the study consisted of the seventh group
of bachelors degree graduates and the thirteenth group
of diploma graduates consisting of 126 male and female
students. A questionnaire was developed for this
purpose and distributed, where 109 valid questionnaires
were received.
The study concluded to that there is a relationship of
statistical indication between the modern training
methods and the efficiency of the training program.
This study submitted a set of recommendations:
- Increase the training funds in order to overcome the
difficulties and hindrances that limit the application of
modern training methods.

training, tourism training

Hayel Falah Al-Serhan (Ph.D. Student, Business
Admin., Faculty of Economics, Teshreen Univircity.
)Lattikia-Syria

.

:

- Select modern training methods that suit the type of

:

training that encourages the Jordan girl to join this

1.1

type of educational programs through promotional

campaigns and adopt incentives of fees discounts.

.


2.2 - Encourage students to join tourism management

program through publications and seminars to point out

the privileges of this subject and provide fees discounts.

.

- Reconsider the method of selecting the modern training


3.
3

methods at (JAUCHTE) and consider using all of the

modern methods, since training is an integrated process.

.

- Attract efficient instructors with experience and capacity

to apply all of the modern training methods in tourism.
Key words: training programs, training methods,

.

:

2013

67


1.1

2.2

.
3.3

4.4

.
:

1.1

2.2

3.3

4.4

5.5

:

:
68

.
:

-1 :

:
-2

.
:

2011
:
-

.

:


:

:
.

2013

- : ....

.
- :

2002(.)4

).

( : 5 )Teresa Brannick, etd, 2002

Service Management Practice Performance Model: a:
focus on Training Practice.
( )

.
:

: 2007(.)1

( )143

( )66 .

2007(.)2
:

.
: 2006(.)3

.



.
:

: .

(.)6

( )

(.)7

( )
. 8

2013

69


: .

( )

. 9

(.)01

:
.

(.)11

(.)21

.
:
.

(:)31

-1
:

-2
:

.
-3
:

.

70

-4
:

:
-5

.
-6

.

-7
.

.



(:)41

: ( ).
:

(


).

.
:
:

(:)51

.
1.1

2.2

.
3.3
.

4.4
.

5.5
.
:

2013

( )Cronbach Alpha

( :) 2

()2

0.754

0.716

0.733
0.810
0.877

** :

( ) 2

( )0.877 -0.716
.

( ) 3

:
()3

91

83.5

18

16.5

99

90.8

10

9.2

80

73.4

29

26.6

** :

( )3

83.5%

16.5%

90.8%

9.2%

73.4%

26.6%

.
:

: .
( )4

1
2

3.9817
4.0092

0.92277
0.90774

3
2

3.844

0.91464

3.9083

0.70107

4.055

1.01685

6
7
8
9
10

3.7706
3.6881
3.633
3.7523
3.5688

0.90914
1.05143
0.76571
0.99215
0.88576

6
8
9
7
10

3.9128

.69002

** :

( )3.9128

()3

( )0.69002

T- test
(:)5

2013

71


( ) 5

Test Value = 3

One-Sample Test

Test Value = 3
Df

Sig.

Mean

95% Confidence Interval of

)(2-tailed

Difference

the Difference
Lower

13.812

108

.000

.91284

.7818

Upper
1.0439

( ) 6

4.082569

0.829195

2
3

3.990826
3.889908

0.93784
1.065793

3
5

3.825688

0.941276

4.275229

0.837452

6
7

3.963303
3.862385

0.768917
1.040547

4
6

16.260

108

Mean
Difference

1.03670

.000

1.1631

.9103

** :

( ) T

( =0.00 ) T = 16.26

.
a 0.05
: :
( )8

** :

( ) T

( =0.00 ) = 13.812T

.
a 0.05

:

df

Sig.
)(2-tailed

95% Confidence Interval of

the Difference
Upper
Lower

3.926606

1.068977

3.53211

0.898237

10

3.577982

1.099609

3.926606

0.824469

0.918345

4.091743

3.880734

1.199728

3.844037

1.028972

3.642202

0.976795

3.853211

1.05256

3.678899

0.921761

10

3.752294

1.106847

10

4.0367

.66565

1.105542

3.688073

0.997193

3.6101

.78575

10

** :
( )4.0367

()3

( ) 0.66565

T- test

( :) 7

4.000

** :

( )3.6101

()3

( )0.78575

. T- test


(:)9

( ) 7

( )9
One-Sample Test

One-Sample Test
72

2013


Test Value = 3

df

Sig.
)(2-tailed

Mean
Difference

95% Confidence Interval

of the Difference
Lower

8.106

108

.000

.61009

.4609

4.06422

0.761033

4.119266

0.648713

4.155963

0.580139

4.238532

0.57573

3.908257

0.764263

Test Value = 3

.7593

One-Sample Test

df

Sig.
)(2-tailed

Lower
14.151

108

.000

4.412844

0.696699

3.990826

0.751485

3.880734

0.978706

3.880734

0.940102

3.642202

1.101539

10

3.990826

0.947662

3.917431

0.991897

3.990826

4.036697

0.719138

4.009174

0.822095

3.706422

0.874566

10

10

3.880734

0.824675

3.8945

.65994

9
10

.7692

0.876603

( )3.8945

()3

( ) 0.65994

1.0198

** :

.89450

Upper

** :

( ) T

( =0.00 ) T = 14.151

.
a 0.05
:
:
( ) 12

Mean
Difference

95% Confidence Interval of

the Difference

( ) 11

Upper

** :

( ) T

( =0.00 ) T = 8.106

.
a 0.05

:
:

( ) 10

T- test
(:)11

3.917431

0.982518

4.082569

0.625514

(
)

4.100917

0.769138

3.8165

.83793

** :

( )3.8165

( )3

( )0.83793

( )

2013

73





T- test

(:)13
( ) 13
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 3

Df

10.173

108

Sig.
)(2-tailed

Mean
Difference

.000

.81651

95% Confidence Interval of the

Difference
Lower

.6574

Upper
.9756

** :

( ) T

( =0.00 ) T = 10.173

.
a 0.05
:

7.7

8.8

( )

.

:
:

1.1
:

1.1

.

2.2


2.2

.

3.3

3.3

.

4.4

4.4
.

5.5

.
5.5

6.6

.

7.7

.
:

6.6

)( 1

2007 .

()setondnE

74

2013




)( 2

2007 .

)( 3

( )28 (2006 )3.
)( 4
:

2002 .

5 )5( Teresa Brannick, Sean de Burca, Brian Fynes, Service
Management Practice Performance Model: a focus on
Training Practice, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol.
26, Issue 8, 2002, pp 394-403.

)( 6
:

... .13
)( 7
:

2000 .534

)( 8

2000 .61

)( 9



2001 .18
)( 10

2001 .93
11
)( Lynton, P.Rolf & Pareek Vdia, 1990, Training for
Development, 2nd, ed, P131.


)( 12
2009 1.168

)( 13

2009 2.463

)( 14

2005 .54
)( 15


2010 1.394

2013

75

: -
.

-

(
)

).
:

= 0.05

) ( )
( = 0.05

( ) ( )

.
( ) = 0.05

( )52.66 (- 33%

( )1.64
.

)55.33%

[.]1

1906

:

[.]2

2013

77

()

164 2006

()

[.]3

1961

[.]8
-

[.]9
-
, [.]10
-


,
,

[.]14

(:]11[)1
( :)1

:

Quality Assurance

[.]4

[.]5

-:

[.]6
:

Accreditation

( ) dependence, trust , confidence

( ) Authorization , sanction , approval

[ ]7
-:

: [:]9

78

-1 Accreditation

.
Certification
-2
2013

.

-3
Permission, Licensing

[.]14

Recognition

-4

-3
Professional Accreditation

-5 Equivalence

-:

[.]14

( :)2

: .




,

( )

,

( )62.66%



:
:

Institutional Accreditation
1.1

.. )

[.]12

)
(

[.]13
( .)53.66% ( )
Specialized or programmatic
-2


:Accreditation

( )74.00%

( )


.
( )79.33%

2013

79

( )
.
( )44.33%


(
)

()48.00%

( )
.
( )54.66%

= 0.05

= 0.05

) ( ) (
((

) ( )

.

( ) = 0.05

( )52.66 (- 33%

( )1.64
.

)55.33%

( )42.66%
( )
.

()

.
( )78.66%

( )
.
( )41.66%

()56.85%
( )
.

()54.00%
( )
.

( )81.33%
( )
.

(


( )43.66%
)
.
(

()46.66%

.
(

( )60.00%
)

.
(

( )50.66%

( :)3

( )52.66%
)

. :

)
(

1.1
.
( )44.33%

( )

.
( )55.33%

( )
.
( )48.33%

(
)

.
( )48.00%

( )
.
( )39.00%

( )
.
( )41.00%

80

2013


:
:

.
2.2

.

3.3

.

4.4
.

5.5

.



6.6

.
7.7

.
8.8

9.9

: :

.
-

.

1010

.
: :

1111

:
(

: :

).

.

: :

:

2013

81

.
::

(
)

: :

.
:

1.1
.

4.4

.

5.5

6.6

7.7

8.8

.

9.9

.

1010

1111

1212

.
1313
.

1414

.

1515

.

1616

2.2

3.3

82

1717 ...

2013

1111

:
.

.2006

1818

1212

.
:

, ( , )6 , 2007
:
.162- 159

1.1 :

13. Ronald, L. Baker : Evaluating Quality and Effectiveness

1 : Regional Accreditation Principles and Practices , The
2003 .17
Journal of Academic Librarianship , Vol.28,no.1/2,January
March2002 , pp 3 7.

2.2 :

( )NCATE

14. Harvey, L :The power of Accreditation: viewer of Academics

() : Workshop European Network for Quality Assurance in

16 15 2007 .7 5
Higher Education, Accreditation Models in Higher Education
3.3 () : Experience and perspective, printed by Multiprint, Helsinki,

Finland , 2004 . pp 5-19.

http://www.higeredu.gov.ly -: .12-03-2012

4.4

: 2007 .16

5. Rama , Kondapalli : Assessment and Accreditation of Teacher

Education Institutions, a Strategic Step to Improve Teacher

Quality National Assessment, Accreditation Council (NAAC),
Bangalore, p6, at http://www.naacindia .com.

6.6

( )24 2002
.68 9
: ( )13
7.7

2000 .129

8. Emmanuel , Topa Makoju: Quality Assurance Practices in

Nigerian Teacher Education, Paper in the Roundtable on

Teacher Education Innovations in Teacher Education:
International Practices of Quality Assurance , Editors.
:
9.9

: .2007

10. Huai, Nathan Jiang : Quality Assurance in Australian

Universities , A Study of Quality Assurance in Undergraduate

Education at University of Culture in 2005 , a Thesis Submitted
in Fulfillment pf the Requirements for the Award of the
Degree Doctor of Education , Faculty of Education , University
of Wollongong , 2007 , p 32.

2013

83

. .

2inarhazlas@ :

.

( )

.



.

.

.


.



00201008415359 :

www.altaknyia.com

85