Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.......... :
.........:
Facult des sciences Economiques, Commerciales et des Sciences de Gestion
Dpartement des Sciences Commerciales
--
)(2010-2009
:
31 :2013
:
2012/2011 :
"
"
)
.(85
III
-
:
IV
.
.
.
" "
.
:
.
.
:
.
-
. -
.
.
:
.
Abstract
The study aimed to explore the relationship between fiscal audit and its role in improving
the quality of fiscal statements, knowing that the fiscal audit is an important factor in the
declarative fiscal system because of its ability to manage the justice and fairness, and quality
of the statement based on the validity and accuracy of the information provided by the
permits to increase and enhance the voluntary fiscal The fiscal audit strategy taxpayer.
compliance and detect and deter non-compliance. Furthermore, the emphasis on the
development of the fiscal audit system corresponding to the fiscal statements, information and
accounts that persons offer permit to discover the irregularities committed in order to get them
to announce the full information about their returns. We have tested our hypothesis with a
questionnaire, and conclude that the fiscal audit can have a positive role in improving the
quality of the fiscal information and declaration, if it is supported by an effective and
available fiscal audit program, by auditors which have a good scientific and practical
qualifications and accuracy, permitting to encourage persons to announce their fiscal
information which increase the fiscal revenues.
Key words: fiscal audit, fiscal auditor, fiscal declarative statement quality, fiscal audit
quality, fiscal compliance.
VI
III
IV
VI
VII
VIII
IX
16
35
45
47
65
78
90
92
97
112
138
144
155
163
VII
)(1-1
19
)(1-2
56
)(1-3
97
)(2-3
2010-2009
104
)(3-3
2010-2009
110
)(4-3
113
)(5-3
114
)(6-3
115
)(7-3
116
)(8-3
117
)(9-3
118
)(10-3
119
)(11-3
119
)(12-3
120
)(13-3
121
)(14-3
)(15-3
122
123
)(16-3
126
)(17-3
128
)(18-3
ANOVA
132
)(19-3
One-Sample Test
134
VIII
)(1-1
)(2-1
20
)(1-2
57
)(2-2
72
)(3-2
79
)(4-2
88
)(1-3
96
)(2-3
115
)(3-3
116
)(4-3
117
)(5-3
122
)(6-3
133
)(7-3
133
)(8-3
IX
134
IRG
IBS
TAP
TVA
OECD
VASFE
BIC
IFU
BNC
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
:
: .
:
. . .
.
:
.
.
.
.
:
.
: .-
:
.
: .2010 -2009
.
.
:
.
-1 " "
.2005
.
.
.
-2 " "
.2004
.
.
-3
.2008-2007
.
.
4- Mesfin Gebeyehu, Tax Audit Practice And Its Significance In
Increasing Revenue In Ethiopia The Case Of Addis Ababa City
Administration, Addis Ababa University, Faculty Of Business& Economics,
.Addis Ababa, 2008
.
.
:
.
.
.
:
.
:
.
.
.
: .
: .
: .
.
.
:
. .
:
:
) (AUDIT ) (AUDIRE ) (ECOUTER
.1
2
1
Eustache Ebonodo, La Governance De Lentreprise Une Approche Par Laudit Et Le Contrle Interne,
Lhamattan, France, 2005, p103.
2 .20
3
.1
:
.
-
.2
:
:
" :
-
".3
" :
".4
- "
1 2010 .8
2
Audit comptable et Financier, Seduisant TAZ-MBODI, Auditeur de lintec CNAM , Spcialiste en audit et
finance,sit:http://www.google.dz/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=audit%20comptable%20et%20financier%2C%20seduisant
%20taz-mbodi&source. 23/07/2012.
3 2004 .2120
4 2009-2008 .3
4
".1
" :
" .2
) (Bonnault) et (Germond " :
".3
) (
.
:
:
:
.4
1
2006
.13
2
2003-2002 .13
3
2010 .11
4
2004/2003 .22
5
)
(.
.
:
.
.1
:
.2
:
1 .
2 .22
6
) :(01-01
: .22
)(
.
:
:
:
1
2007 .26
7
. :
) ( American Institute of Certified Public Accountants AICPA
1954
:
:
:
-1
.
) (
.1
.
1
2009/2008.96
8
.1AICPA
:
.2
-2
3
-3
.4
:
:
-1
1
2002 .26
2 .91
3
2008 .15
4 .31
9
-2
.1
-3
.2
:
:
-1
-2
-3
-4
.3
2006/2005 .22
.
2 .41
3
Dauber N.A., Qureshi A.A, Levine M.H, Siegel J.G, The Complete Guide To Auditing Standards, And
Other Professional standards for Accountants, Published By John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New
Jersey, Canada, 2008, p34.
10
.1
:
- :
. - :
- :
- : .
:
:
:
:
) (Audit Financier
Eustache Ebonodo, op cit, p224.
Dauber N.A., Qureshi A.A, Levine M.H., Siegel J.G, op-cit, p282.
11
1
2
.1
:
) (Institue Of Internals Auditos IIA audit
)( oprationnel "
".2
...
.3
:
) (Audit Fiscal .
:
-1
.
1 2005 .12
2 .24
3 " : "
2010 .3
4 .27-26
12
-2
.
:
.1 ...
:
-1 ) :(Audit Social
.....
-2 ) :(Audit Informatique
-3 ) :(Audit Stratgique
-4 ) :(Audit Qualit
-5 ) :(Audit Environnemental
.3
1
2005.21
2 .2928
3 .
13
:
:
.
:
1
.
:
.2
1 .25
2
2009-2008 .13
14
.1
:
.
.
:
.2
2 .26
15
:
) (...
.
.
:
.
:
:
:
:
-1 ) (ATIC
" :
.
".1
-2 " :
".2
Felli Mounira , Laudit Fiscal, Mmoire De (PGS) En Finances Publique, Institut Maghrbin Dconomie
Douanire Et Fiscal IEDF, Algrie, 2009-2011, p8.
2
Benadda.M.F, Laudit Fiscal Aspect Thorique Et Pratique, Mmoire De Troisime Cycle En Finances
Publiques, Customs And Fiscal Maghreb Institue, 2004, p2.
16
" .
.
.
-2
) (conseil
Joint Audit Report, Sixth Meeting Of The OECD, Forum On Tax Administration, Istanbul, September,
2010,p p 16,17. sit http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/10/13/45988932.pdf date: 10/02/2012.
18
-1
-2 ) (Simultaneous Audits
-3
-4
-5
.
) :(1-1 ) Structured Framework for an International
(Tax Audit
)( Activities
)( Stages
-1 )( Planning
-2 )( Execution
- .
-3
- -
)( Forming a judgement
- .
19
Source: Joint Audit Report, Sixth Meeting Of The OECD, Forum On Tax Administration, Istanbul, September,
..sit http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/10/13/45988932.pdf date: 10/02/201218 2010,p
.
:
) :(2-1
20
) (..
) (
.
:
:
:
:
-1
-2
-3
.1
:
.
) (...
) (Nordic Assistance Convention .
1
- -
2004/2003 . 13
21
.1
:
.2
.3
:
:
)Organization For Economic Co-Operation
1 .181
2
2010 .47
3
2009 30.61
22
.
:
)(Periods under examination
) (...
) (
:
) (Location of audits
OECD, Strengthening Tax Audit Capabilities : General Principles And Approaches, Forum On Tax
Administrations Compliance Sub-Group, October 2006, p p9,10. sit
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/16/37590009.pdf date : 20/4/2012
23
. .
) (
.1
:
:
.2
.3
:
Idem.
2 .2
3 .6261
24
.1
:
.
:
.
:
.
-1
. :
Multistate tax commission, sales & use tax audit manual, Washington, 2010, p33, sit http:
//www.mtc.gov/uploadedfiles/multistate_tax_commission/audit_program date :2/2/2012.
25
.1
-2
:
. :
:
: %10
50.000 %15 50.000
200.000.2 ...
:
.
.3
1 : "
" 12-11 2010 .43
2 " " 2005
.12
3 .
26
.
.
:
)(910
:
.
. :
:
) (Indpendance
.1
Seddik.R.S, Laudit Fiscal Des Socits Dans Le Contexte Marocain Aspects Mthodologiques Et
Pratiques, Mmoire Pour Lobtention Du Diplme National Dexpert Comptable, Institut Suprieur De
Commerce Et Dadministration Des Entreprises, Maroc, p21.
27
:
)( Secret professionnel
.
:
) (Comptence
- -
.1
:
) (
.2...
.
Idem.
28
:
:
:
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
) (
-6
-7
-8 .2
:
.
1
(
) .3
2 .49
29
. :
:
:
-1 :
...
-2 Prendre connaissance des lments :
juridiques, comptables et de gestion
:
... .
-3 :
.1...
-4 :
.
-5 :
.2
- :
30
Idem.
.
:
) :(Promote voluntary compliance
)
(1
) Identify areas of the law that require
:(clarification
2
) :(Gather Information
: )
(
):(Law Clarification And Educate taxpayers
Mesfin Gebeyehu, Tax Audit Practice And Its Significance In Increasing Revenue In Ethiopia The Case
Of Addis Ababa City Administration, Faculty Of Business& Economics, Addis Ababa University, Addis
Ababa, 2008, p17.
2
Ibid, p19.
31
.1
) (Tax education and tax knowledge :
) (
. 2...
:
.
.3
:
- .
Edmund Biber, Revenue Administration: Tax Payer Audit-Development of Effective Plans, Technical
Notes And Manuals, Fiscal Affairs Department, International Monetary Fund, April 2010, p3.
2
Palil M.R, Tax Knowledge And Tax Compliance Determinants In Self Assessment System In Malaysia,
Doctor Of Philosophy Thesis, Department Of Accounting And Finance, The University Of Birmingham,
Malaysia, 2010, p42.
3
Felli mounira, op.cit, p19.
.
32
-1
) (Check-list
>< ><
.1
2
.
-2
.3 -3
.4
1 .79
2
4 .83
33
.
.
.83
34
:
:
: . - : .
:
) (190
" :
" 113
" :
"
.1
) 37 (.2
:
:
1
.45
2
Ministre des finances, direction gnrale des impts, Guide pratique du Contribuable direction des
relations publiques et de la communication, Algrie, 2011.
35
-1
-2
-3 ) (
-4
.
-5
.
-6 :
-7
-8
...
-9 ...
) (
.
:
" "
:
-1 )
(
-2
-3
-4
(n31 ) (
) (relev de comptabilit srie k 37
-5
.1
:
:
10
.
1 .
37
:
-1
-2
.1
:
.2 :
-1 :
: : )(..
: 9 12
:
2010/2009 .119
2 .
9 :
.
12 : 9 10 10
.
38
: ) (Procdure Contradictoire
40 .
-2 :
:
.1
) " ( La Taxation Doffice
"
40 .2
.3
:
.
1
" " 2009 .10
2 .
3 .119
39
.
-
.2
10 .3
:
1992 131
)La vrification VASFE
1 .80
2
Ministre des finances, direction gnrale des impts, Guide pratique du Contribuable direction des
relations publiques et de la communication, Algrie, 2011.
3 20 2010.19
40
) (VASFE
.1
) (Thierry Lambert " :
" .22001
.
: ) (VASFE
: )(VASFE
%5
:
-1
-2
-3
-4 ) (
-5
.
.3
1 ) (1999-1995
2002-2001.109
2 .
3 2009
.83
41
: )(VASFE
:
-1
-2 15 1
-3
...
...
-4
.
:
: )(VASFE
.2
...
1 21 .20
2 .123122
42
-1
-2
-3
-4 .
.
:
:
40 . :
. 1 .125 124
43
:
.
.
44
.
.
.
03 :
: .
: .
:
.
46
:
.
03
:
-
: .
:
.
: .
:
.1
.1
:
.
:
.
:
2 ...
.
.
.3
1 2007 .44
2 2009-1992
2006-2005 .36
3 . 149148
48
:
:
:
) (Piet Vandendriessche
) :(Deloitte
.3
1 2009-1992 - .3536
2
2008 .50
.
Vilatte G, Les entreprises belges entretiennent de bonnes relations avec les autorits fiscales, News
49
:
:
(
) 1
2
:
) (NIF )
8 4 3 (2003
3
1 .53
2
2004 .62
3 2009-1992 .172
4 .3738
50
.1
:
.
.2
25 2003
3 2009
) ( Fraudeurs
1 2004-2003
.110
2 21
2011 .http://www.echaab.info.tn/detailarticle.asp?idx=12557 :
51
29 .
2009 .1
2
.3
:
:
:
:
135 " :
136
".4
1 .
2 .4142
3 .38
136 2011 :
...
4 135 .
52
-1
) ( Impts Sur Les Bnfice Des Socits IBS
) G50 (
.1
2
%25 %19
%50 %25
%50 .3
) ( Acomptes
.
) = - % 25 ( .4
-2
148 " :
136 ".5
:
1 2010-2009 .33
2
2008.235
3
150 .2011
4 .235
5 148 .2011
53
.1
: ) ( ) (.2
-3
.
.
.3
-4
1 2 2003 .3224
2 ) ( 2004-1992
2006-2005 .102
3
12 2011.74
54
:
) (
.1 %60
2006 %25 2008
.2%19
:
01 02
)L'impt Sur Le Revenu IRG
(Global
:
42
.3
-1
:
25 2009
.184
2 .33
3 01 02 .2011
55
) :(1-2
120.000
120.001 360.000
20
360.001 1 .440.000
30
1 .440.000
35
: 104 .2011
-2 IRG )(BIC
)(Les bnfices industriels, et commerciaux
:
-
10.000.000 :
.1
- ) : (Le Rgime Simplifi
) (Limpt forfaitaire Unique
10.000.000.2
Ministre Des Finances, Direction Gnrale Des Impts, Guide Pratique Du Contribuable, Algrie, 2010.
Idem.
56
1
2
:
.1
:
) :(1-2
: .129
1 20 02 .2011
2 282 1 .139
Ministre Des Finances, Direction Gnrale Des Impts, Le Systme Fiscal Algrien, Algrie, 2011.
57
) (
.4
Guide Pratique Du Contribuable, op cit, p15.
2 .102
3 .183
4 2003
.8
58
-1
" :
"
1968
62 1990 18
%17 %7 12001
%7
%17
.2
-2
:
18 ) ( 2001
.
1 "
" 2005 .10
Ministre Des Finances, Direction Gnrale Des Impts, Guide Pratique De la TVA, Algrie, 2011.
3
2006-2005
.72
59
:
-1
) (Tax Sur Activit Professionnel T.A.P
%2.55 1996 %2 .12001
.
-2
223 :
.
:
.
:
) 8 30
) ( IRG ) (IBS .3
183 " :
1 .10
2 223 2011 .116
3 .26
60
".1
:
-
3 183
30.000.
:
) (Declaration Mensuelle
Ministre Des Finances, Calendrier Fiscal, Direction De La Lgislation Fiscal Sous Direction Des Relations
Publiques Et De Linformation, Algrie, Edition 2004, p 7.
4 194 .2011
5 .27
61
-2
:
/ ) :(IRG- BIC) ( Rgime Simplifie
) (IRG Les bnfices
(BNC .
) (TAP ) (TVA 20 .
: )(Dclaration Annuelle
30
:
-1
) (IBS
) (Srie G n4
) ( 30
)
(
1
Ministre Des Finances, Direction Gnrale Des Impts, Guide Pratique Des Dclarations Fiscales, Algrie,
2010, p13.
2
Guide Pratique Du Contribuable, op-cit, p62.
62
.1
.
153
.
-2
) (IRG
30
) (Srie G n01 )
.(...
) (G n1 -
:
1 152 .2011
Ministre Des Finances, Guide Pratique Des Dclarations Fiscales, op.cit, p62.
63
1 110
64
:
.
) (...
. :
:
:
:
.1
.
.2
:
:
1
45 2010 .16
2
3 11 2009 .81
65
:
.1
:
.
:
.
... .2
:
-1
) (Relevance
.3
:
1
2009 .54
Brasseur .C, data management qualit des donnes et comptitivit, lavoisier, hermes science, 2005, p67.
3
2006 .22
66
) (Timelines
1
.2
:
. TVA TAP
:
-02-201+
-06-201+
-09-20.31+
20 .
1
72 2009 .13
2
2007-2006 .5152
3 .10
4
2009-2008 .56
67
...
-2
) (Reliability " :
".1
:
-
) :(Verifiability
" :
"
.2
-
1
26 2010 .316
2
2009-2008 .54
68
) :(Neutrality .1
.2
-3
3
.4
:
. 1
2009-2008 .98
2 .14
3 .52
4 2002-2001 .22
5
2004/2003 .5
69
.
.
.
3 26 11-07 25 2007
.1
:
.
-1
) (Consistency
.2
-2 )(Comparability
.3
1 " :
IFRS IAS "ISA 2011 .12
2 2
10 2008 .117
3 .
70
-3
.
.1
-4
:
.2
.3
.
) ( :
1
2011 .26
2 .59
3
2009 .62
71
.1
:
) :(2-2
:
" - "- 2007.25
.
) ( S.C.F
1
- - 2007
http://www.jps-dir.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4665 .2012/6/16
72
.1
:
.
)
( .2 ) (Mohd rizal palil :
"
" .3
:
:
:
.
4
1 ) ( IAS-IFRS
2009.293
2
Marti L.O., Wanjohi M.S., Magutu P.O., Mokoro J.M, Taxpayers Attitudes And Tax Compliance Behavior
In Kenya, African Journal Of Business & Management, Aibuma Publishing, April 2010, p114.
3
Palil M.R, tax knowledge and tax compliance determinants in self assessment system in malasia, op-cit,
p157.
4 2004
.124
73
:
.1
:
.
:
) :(Probability of Detection
" "
.
.3
1 .47
2 2000 16.166
Palil. M.R , Fariq. M. A, Determinants Of Tax Compliance In Asia A Case Of Malaysia, European Journal
Of Social Sciences, Volume 24, Number 1, 2011, P14.
3
74
:
:
.1
:
2
3
.4
1 .122
2
) ( 2009
.714
3
2007 .4
4
Jacobs A.A, Managing Principal, Usersstandars For Integrated Tax Information Systems In Tax
Administrations Of Developing Counties, The M Group Inc,p 7. sit www.mgroupglobal.com. Date 15-012012.
75
:
.1
:
:
.
-
.2
:
.3
1 " "
2010 .5
2
Palil M.R, tax knowledge and tax compliance determinants in self assessment system in malasia, op-cit,
p192.
76
.1
1 2011 11 :19
www.radioalgere.dz :
77
.
.
.
:
.
.
78
.1
:
- :
.
- : .
) :( 3-2
1 .106
79
:
:
:
:
-1 :
:
-2 :
-3 :
:
.
Biber E, op-cit, p5.
80
:
:
-1:
-2:
.
:
:
...
:
:
.
81
:
.
.
:
. ) (compliance
) (
.
.
:
: )(Corrective
82
: )(Deterrent
:
:
: )(Preventative
.
:
" ".
:
.
.3
Ibid, pp 1,2.
3 4
8 2006 .207
83
.
" :
".1
.2
1
2009 .28
2 .47
84
.1
.2
:
" ".
:
.
1 2012
.33 http://www.rbiproject.com/metac1-presentations_files/Mark%20Konza- :
Main%20Presentation-Arabic.pdf.2012/6/18 :
2009 .28
85
:
" : " .1
:
:
2
" "
.3
:
:
1 .97
2 .
3 .615
86
.1
.
.2
:
:
:
:
...
.4
1 .98
2 .8
3 .69
4
87
.1
:
" ".
:
) :(4-2
1 " "
.7
88
.
:
.
89
.
:
: .
: .
: .
91
:
:
)(Exploratoire
) (Le Test .
) (...
.1
.
.
: -
:
.
:
) (05
:
22
2010.16
92
: :
-1 :
.
-2 :
.
-3 :
.
-4 :
.
: : ) (03
-1 :
.
-2 :
.
-3 :
.
93
:
.
:
.
:
.
)(03 :
-1 :
.
-2 :
.
-3 :
.
.
94
: : ) (04
-1 :
.
-2 :
) .(...
-3 : ) (.
-4 :
.
:
95
) :(1-3
: --
96
) (
.
.
.
:
:
) :(1-3
:
2007
2008
2009
2010
21
21
84.168.193,00
35
35
116.998.315 ,00
31
31
174.798.852 ,00
22
14
22
18.025.719.00
14
6.316.630,00
: .
) (1-3 ) (
2008 21 2007 35 2008
97
:
.2003
.
:
) (Assiette
.1 :
1 .155
98
:
-1 ) (G50
= A1
100
-2 ) (
= A2
100
-3 " "
=A3
" "
100
) A3 A2 A1 (
) (A1
) (A2
) (A3
.
Ministre Des Finances, Dispositif Dvaluation Des Performances Des Services Extrieurs, DGI, 2003, P4.
99
:
-1 :
) ( IBS ) (G4
= A4
100
.
) ( BIC /G11
= A5
100
= A6
) (BNC
100
.
) (G1
= A7
100
)
(
.
100
-2
) (IBS/G4
100
= A8
.
) (BIC/G11
100
= A9
.
) (BNC/G13
100
= A10
.
) (G1
100
= A11
.
.
101
-3 ) (
- :
= A12
) (IBS/G4
100
: ) (BIC/G11
100
= A13
) (BNC/G13
100
= A14
) (IRG/G1
100
= A15
.1
:
) (G18
100
= A16
1 .179
102
) (G18
100
= A17
) (G18
.1
:
100
= A18
= A19
100
(A18) :
) (A19
.
1 .159
103
) :(2-3 2010-2009
2009
42069
A1
)(
A2
A3
" "
A4
G4 /IBS
284
515
62143
17718
17718
20359
44525
2131
A5
G11 /BIC
A6
G13/BNC
A7
G1/IRG
A8
G4 /IBS
515
A9
G11 /BIC
376
A10
G13/BNC
A11
G1/IRG
541
9006
A12
G4 /IBS
515
A13
G11 /BIC
3872
624
905
2948
9006
96
3872
100
905
515
104
600
3872
2010
%
67
100
45
55
55
68
32
18
11
6
22
15
31966
50595
16790
16790
15582
33805
318
583
2262
3890
693
944
3211
6976
71
583
341
3890
74
944
525
6976
113
583
549
3890
%
63
100
46
54
58
73
46
12
8
7
19
14
67
A14
G13/BNC
A15
G1/IRG
A16
G18
1118
A17
1949
G18
1949
241
+A18
905
584
9006
1118
241
A19
7
6.4
100
100
100
83
944
647
6976
1526
1526
2619
2619
232
232
8
9
100
100
100
: .
:
: A1
(2009) %67 (2010) %63 ) (%100
" " %45 %46
IBS BIC BNC IRG %55
%68 %32 2010 %46
(2009) 68 (2010) %44
.
: %18 % 12 2009 2010
9 %8 11%8
6 %7 .
2009 2010 %22%19
A12 %14 %15 A13 %8 %7 A14%9 %6.4
105
.A15
A16 ) A17 (%100
%100 2009.2010
:
) (
.
:
) (recouvrement
:
:
= R1
100
)( )(1-
= R2
100
)(1-
106
:
)(
100
= R3
100
= R4
:
100
= R5
:
= R6
100
.
:
20
:
= RH1
107
100
.
.
:
:
-1
+
= C1
100
-2
= C2
100
-1 ) (
= C3
100
-2
= C4
100
108
.
: ) (
-1
= C7
= C8
)/12/31 (
100
100
-2
= C9
100
-3
= C10
)(1+
100
:
) (. -1
= C12
100
109
-2
= C13
100
.
) :(3-3 2010-2009
2010
2009
31
22
0.59
25
5314
0.47
460
2310
19.9
90
C1
) (
C2
32
5417
C3
460
2178
21.12
C4
452
460
98
414
460
C7
32
31
103
25
22
113.63
C8
C9
32
5
6.4
25
5
C10
: .
) (C3,C2, C1
2009 31 ) %0,59
110
32 (
2010 22 ) %0,47 25 3
( %21.12 2009%19,9
2009 2010 %98
%90 2009.2010
%100 2009 2010
C8 C9
2009 6.4 2010 5 .
C10 .
:
) (
.
) (
) (
)
(.
111
:
:
:
) (Questionnaire
) (Statiscal Pakage for social Sience SPSS
SPSS Version 16
.
:
36
32
%88 .
:
26
.
:
)(
.
112
:
:
) :(4-3
-1
-2
09
-3
09
-4
08
) : (.
:
:
:
) (09
.
:
) (09
.
113
:
) (08
.
) ( 1 3 3
:
) :(5-3
:
) (SPSS :
:
:
:
) (Corrlation
:
114
:
) (F .
:
:
) :(6-3
%
28,12
40-30
28,12
50-40
11
34,38
50
9,38
32
100
30
: SPSS
) (6-3 40 50
) (%34,38 ) (%28,12 30 40
) (%9,38 50 .
. :
) :( 2-3
: .SPSS
115
:
) :(7-3
25
78,1
21,9
32
100
: .SPSS
: .SPSS
116
:
) :( 8-3
5-1
28,12
10-6
21,88
15-11
9,38
16
13
40,62
32
100
: .SPSS
) ( 8-3 %40,62 16
% 28,12 5-1 %21,88
10-6 % 9,38 15-11 16
.
) :(4-3
: SPSS
:
:
117
-1
) (01
.
. ) (02 .
-2
) (
.
) :( 9-3
**0,23
**0,46
**0,62
**0,30
**0,46
**0,29
**0,41
**0,36
**0,22
** )(0.05
: SPSS
) (9-3
) (
)
(0,05 0,22 0,62 ) (3
.
118
) :(10-3
**0,06
**0,012
**0,34
**0,36
**0,53
**0,40
**0,61
**0,22
**0,30
** )(0.05
: SPSS
) (10-3
) (
) (0,05 0,22 0,61 ) (7
.
) (11-3
**0,37
**0,18
**0,39
**0,19
**0,11
**0,11
**0,50
**0,36
** )(0.05
: .SPSS
119
) (11-3
) (
)
(0,05 0,11 0,50 ) (8
.
:
) (cronbachs alpha 0 1
.1
) ( :
) :(12-3
26
0,83
0,91
: .SPSS
) (12-3 ) (0.83
) (0.91 ) (
.
: -
)(Test de Kolmogorov-Smirnov un chantillon
1 SPSS
.38
120
. .
:
: .
: .
).(0,05
) :(13-3
Test de Kolmogorov-Smirnov un chantillon
T1
Variable
32
2.54
0.39
Ecart-type
0.17
0.12
Positive
-0.17
Ngative
0.95
Z de Kolmogorov-Smirnov
0.33
: SPSS
) (0,33
) (0,05 .
:
: SPSS
2005.66
121
) :(5-3
- ) (2,54 ) (0,30 .
:
:
:
) :( 14-3
1 1,66
1,67 2,33
2,34 3
: SPSS.539
) (2/3 0,66 1 2 3 .
:
- 1 :
122
) :(15-3
X1
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
X7
X8
X9
26
81.2
12.5
6.2
23
71.9
18.8
9.4
19
59.4
15.6
25
19
59.4
18.8
21.9
21
65.6
21.9
12.5
24
75
12.5
12.5
26
81.2
15.6
3.1
19
59.4
18.8
21.9
18
10
56.2
31.2
12.5
195
53
40
67.7
18.41
13.89
2.75
0.57
2.63
0.66
2.34
0.86
2.38
0.83
2.53
0.72
2.62
0.71
2.78
0.49
2.38
0.83
2.44
0.72
2.54
0.39
: SPSS
) (15-3
2.54 0.39
.
:
123
) (7X
) (2.78 ) (0.49 ) (
) (% 81.2 . )
( .
) (1X
) (2.75 ) (0.57
) ( ) (% 81.2 .
) ( .
) (2X
) (2.63 ) (0.66 ) (
) (% 71.9 . )
( .
) (6X
) (2.62 ) (0.71 ) (
) (% 75 . )
( .
) (5X ) (2.53
) (0.72 ) ( ) (% 65.6
. ) ( .
124
) (9X
) (2.44 ) (0.72 ) (
) (% 56.2 . )
( .
) (8X
) (2.38 ) (0.83
) ( ) (% 59.4 . )
( .
) (4X
) (2.38 ) (0.83
) ( ) (% 59.4 .
) ( .
125
) :( 16-3
X1
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
X7
8X
9X
22
68.8
21.9
9.4
17
12
53.1
37.5
1.96
16
50
28.1
21.9
17
10
53.1
31.2
15.6
23
71.9
18.8
9.4
20
62.5
28.1
9.4
17
11
53.1
34.4
12.5
14
10
43.8
31.2
25
14
43.8
28.1
28.1
160
83
45
55.57
28.81
14.81
2.59
0.66
2.44
0.67
2.28
0,81
2.38
0.75
2.62
0.66
2.53
0.67
2.41
0.71
2 .19
0.82
2.16
0.84
2.40
0.37
: SPSS
) (16-3
2.40
0.37
.
) (.
:
126
) (5X
) (2.62 ) (0.66 ) (
) (% 71.9
.
) ( .
) (1X ) (2.59 ) (0.66
) ( ) (% 68.8 .
) ( .
) (6X
) (2.53 ) (0.67 ) (
) (% 62.5 . )
( .
) (2X
) (2.44 ) (0.67
) ( ) (% 53.1 . )
( .
) (7X
) (2.41 ) (0.71
) ( ) (% 53.1 . )
( .
127
) (3X
) (2.38 ) (0.75 ) (
) (% 53.1 . )
( .
) (4X
)(2.28
) (0.81 ) ( )
(% 50 . ) (
.
) (8X
) (2.19 ) (0.82 )
( ) (% 43.8 . )
( .
) (9X
) (2.16 ) (0.84 ) (
) (% 43.8 . )
( .
-3 :
128
) :(17-3
X1
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
X7
X8
19
11
59.4
34.4
6.2
20
10
62.5
31.2
6.2
18
11
56.2
34.4
9.4
22
68.8
15.6
15.6
21
65.6
15.6
18.8
15
12
46.9
15.6
37.5
23
71.9
6.2
21.9
18
12
56.2
37.5
6.2
156
61
39
60.94
23.81
15.23
2.53
0.62
2.56
0.62
2.47
0.67
2.53
0.76
2.47
0.80
2.09
0.93
2.50
0.84
2.50
0.62
2.46
0.36
: SPSS
) ( 17-3
2.46
0.36
.
:
129
) (2X
) (2.56 ) (0.62 ) (
) (% 62.5
.
) ( .
) (1X
... ) (2.53
) (0.62 ) ( ) (% 59.4
. ) ( .
) (4X ) (2.53 ) (0.76
) ( ) (% 68.8 .
) ( .
) (5X
) (2.47 ) (0.80 )
( ) (% 65.6 . )
( .
) (3X
) (2.47 ) (0.67 ) (
) (% 56.2 . )
( .
130
) (7X )(2.50
) (0.84 ) ( )
(% 71.9 .
) (8X
) (2.50 ) (0.62 ) (
) (% 56.2 . )
( .
)(6X ) (2.09 ) (0.93
) ( ) (% 46.9 .
) ( .
:
) ANOVA (F
)
(
LSD ) (. :
) :(H0a .
) :(H1a . ) :(H0b .
) :(H1b .131
) :(H0c .
) :(H1c .
).(0.05
:
) :(18-3 ANOVA
15-11
2.88
16
2.80
5-1
2.13
10-6
2.20
15-11
2.88
16
2.57
5-1
2.18
10-6
2.55
15-11
2.54
16
2.57
8.28
2.84
0.055
10-6
2.28
5-1
2.23
11.062
: SPSS
:
"
" "
) (0 ) (0,05 5-1
2.20 2.3 ) (
6
2,40 2,8 )(
132
.
:
) :(6-3
: .SPSS
) :(7-3
: .SPSS
133
) :(8-3
: .SPSS
:
) ( One-Sample Test :
) :( 19-3 One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
Mean
Upper
Lower
Difference
)Sig. (2-tailed
Df
2.6789
2.3975
2.53819
.000
31
36.802
t1
2.5327
2.2659
2.39931
.000
31
36.684
t2
2.5884
2.3257
2.45703
.000
31
38.159
t3
: SPSS
: 0.000 0.05
) (2.54
134
) (tax gap
).
(.1
: 0.000 0,05
) (2,40 .
.
: ) (19-3 0.000 0,05
) (2,45 .
) (Mohd rizal palil
.2
.F.Clemens And R.Nadine , Tax Evasion, Tax Avoidance And Tax Expenditures In Developing Countries :
Areview Of The Literature, Report Prepared For The Uk Department For International Development (DFID),
Oxford University Centre For Business Taxation, 2009, p21.
Palil M.R, op cit , p70.
135
:
) ( %71.9
) ( %68.8
.
136
.
.
.
) (
) (
.
.
138
.
.
) (
.
.
.
:
139
.
.
.
.
.
.
) (
.
.
:
140
.
.
. . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
141
.
.
:
.
142
-1
.2002
-2 .2007
-3 .2009
-4 .2004
-5
.2005
-6 .2008
-7
.2009
-8
.2003
-9
.2008
-10
.2009
-11 : SPSS
.2005
-12 .2010
-13
2010
144
-14
.2006
-1
45 .2010
-2
10 2.2008
-3
11 3.2009
-4 ) ( IAS-IFRS
.2009
-5 2
.2003
-6 25
.2009
-7
2003 .
-8
.2007
-9
.2006
-10
. 2009 30
145
-11
.2009
-12
8 4 .2006
-13
26 .2010
-14 16 .2000
-15
72 .2009
:
-1 ) ( 2004-1992
.2006-2005
-2
.2007-2006
-3
.2006/2005
-4
.2008-2007
-5
.2004/2003
146
:
-1
.2008
-2 2009-1992
.2006-2005
-3
.2008
-4
.2004
-5 - -
.2004
-6
.2006
-7
.2011
-8
.2004
-9 .2009
-10
.2009
-11 -2005
.2006
-12 ) (1999-1995
.2002-2001
147
-13
.2009-2008
-14
.2010-2009
-15 .2002-2001
-16
.2009/2008
-17
.2009
-18
.2005
-19
.2010/2009
-20
.2009-2008
-21 " "2003-1999
.2004/2003
-22
.2004/2003
-23
.2007
-24
.2009-2008
-25
.2004-2003
148
-26
.2010
-1
" " .2009
-2
" " .2005
-3
" " 4-3 .2005
-4 "
" 12-11 .2010
-5 .2006
-6 SPSS
.
-7 " "
.2005
-8
" IFRS /IAS "ISA
.2011
-9
" " 1314.2007
-10
-12
" " .2009
-13 " "
22 .2010
-14 "
" .2009
-1 148 .2011
-2 01 02 .2011
-3 20 02 .2011
-4 223 .2011
-5 183 .2011
-6 194 .2011
-7 152 .2011
-8 103 .2011
-1
) http://www.nazaha.iq/%5Cpdf_up%5C1532%5Cpp-l :
.(2012/6/21
-2 2011
11 : 19 .www.radioalgere.dz :
-3
2012 http://www.rbiproject.com/metac1- :
presentations_files/Mark%20Konza-Main%20Presentation-Arabic.pdf.2012/6/18 :
150
Les ouvrages
1- Brasseur. C, data management qualit des donnes et comptitivit,
Lavoisier, hermes science, 2005.
2- Eustache Ebonodo, La Governance De Lentreprise Une Approche Par
Laudit Et Le Contrle Interne, Lhamattan, France, 2005.
3- Dauber N.A., Qureshi A.A, Levine M.H, Siegel J.G, The Complete Guide
To Auditing Standards, And Other Professional standards for Accountants,
Published By John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, Canada, 2008.
Les Thses
1- Felli mounira, laudit fiscal, mmoire de fin dtude pour lobtention du
diplme de poste graduation spcialis (PGS) en finances publique, institut
maghrbin dconomie douanire et fiscal IEDF, Maroc, priodes 2009-2011.
2- Kaaouana Hanen et Dhambri Hichem , Laudit Fiscal, maitrise Sciences
Comptable,
Doctor Of Philosophy, Department Of Accounting And Finance, The University
Of Birmingham, Malaysia, 2010.
6- Seddik. R. S, Laudit Fiscal Des Socits Dans Le Contexte Marocain
Aspects Mthodologiques Et Pratiques, Mmoire Prsente Pour Lobtention
Du Diplme National Dexpert Comptable, Institut Suprieur De Commerce Et
Dadministration Des Entreprises, Maroc.
Les Revues et Les Rapports
1-Clemens Fuest And Nadine Riedel, Tax Evasion, Tax Avoidance And Tax
Expenditures In Developing Countries, Areview Of The Literature, Report
Prepared For The Uk Department For International Development (DFID),
Centre For Business Taxation, Oxford University, 2009.
2- Biber .E, Revenue Administration : Tax Payer Audit-Development of
Effective Plans, Technical Notes And Manuals, Fiscal Affairs Department,
International Monetary Fund, April 2010.
3- Joint Audit Report, Sixth Meeting Of The OECD, Forum On Tax
Administration, Istanbul, September, 2010.
4- Marti L.O., Wanjohi M.S., Magutu P.O., Mokoro J.M, Taxpayers Attitudes
And Tax Compliance Behavior In Kenya, African Journal Of Business &
Management ( Ajbuma), Aibuma Publishing, April 2010.
5- Palil M.R, Fariq. M. A, Determinants Of Tax Compliance In Asia A Case
Of Malaysia, European Journal Of Social Sciences, Volume 24, Number 1,
2011.
Sminaires Et Confrences
1- A.Raouya , Modernisation De Ladministration Fiscaleles Prochaines
Etapes, Confrence Nationale Des Cadres De Ladministration Fiscaleles,
152
Bulletin Dinformation De La Direction Gnrale Des Impts, La Lettre De La
DGI, Ministre Des Finance, Algrie , 2010
Les Lois
1- Ministre Des Finances, Direction Gnrale Des Impts, Guide Pratique Du
Contribuable, 2010.
2- Ministre Des Finances, Le Systme Fiscal Algrien, Direction Gnrale
Des Impts, 2011.
3- Ministre Des Finances, Direction Gnrale Des Impts, Guide Pratique De
la TVA, 2011.
4- Ministre Des Finances, Direction De La Lgislation Fiscal Sous Direction
Des Relations Publiques Et De Linformation, Calendrier Fiscal, Edition 2004.
5- Direction Gnrale Des Impts, Ministre Des Finances, Guide Pratique Des
Dclarations Fiscales, 2010.
6- Ministre Des Finances, Dispositif Dvaluation Des Performances Des
Services Extrieurs, DGI, 2003.
Sites Internet
1- Arturo A.Jacobs, Managing Principal, Usersstandars For Integrated
Tax Information Systems In Tax Administrations Of Developing
Counties, The M Group Inc. sit www.mgroupglobal.com. 15-01-2012.
2- Audit comptable et Financier, Sduisant TAZ-MBODI, Auditeur de lintec
CNAM ,
Spcialiste
en
audit
et
finance,
sit:
http://www.google.dz/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=audit%20comptable%20et%20fin
ancier%2C%20seduisant%20tazmbodi&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CB8QF
jAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newafrika.org%2FIMG%2Fdoc%2FSYN
THESE_AUDIT_FINANCIER_ET_COMPTABLE.doc&ei=REtjUIzLEqP
153
d4QTvxID4Ag&usg=AFQjCNHyJoEU-30zdPbvglrTuhZly1ncwg
date :
23/7/2012.
3- Forum On Tax Administrations Compliance Sub-Group, Strengthening
Tax Audit Capabilities : General Principles And Approaches, Prepared
By OECD (Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development),
16 October 2006,p8.
4- Multistate tax commission, sales & use tax audit manual, Washington,
2010,
p33,
sit
http
//www.mtc.gov/uploadedfiles/multistate_tax_commission/audit_program
date :2/2/2012.
5- Tax audit Framework, article et disponible sur le sit www.icap.org.pk
6- Vilatte G, Les entreprises belges entretiennent de bonnes relations avec les
autorits fiscales, News Relese, Belgium, Sit : Www.Deloitte.Com-AssetsDcom-Belgium- Date 22-12-2011.
154
) :(1
.
--
--
156
)(2
-
:
Le Rle Daudit Fiscale dans lAmlioration de La Qualit Des Dclarations Fiscales
-.
.
:
157
:
)( :
30 -1 :
40 -30 50 -40 50 -2 :
-3 :
5-1
10-6
16
15-11
/1
01
02
03
04
.
.
05
06
07
.
158
08
09
/2
01
02
03
04
..
05
06
07
08
09
/3
01
02
....
159
03
04
05
06
07
08
160
III
IV
VI
VII
VIII
IX
8
162
11
11
14
16
16
16
18
21
22
22
24
25
27
27
28
28
29
29
29
35
:
163
35
35
37
40
""VASFE
:
40
: " "VASFE
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
47
47
48
49
49
50
51
164
52
52
58
60
65
65
65
66
73
74
75
78
78
79
80
82
83
85
165
85
87
89
90
91
92
92
: -
92
92
96
97
97
98
98
106
107
108
112
112
:
166
112
112
112
112
113
114
113
117
122
122
134
136
138
144
155
163
167