Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- 7
Unit 7
7 -
Agenda
Estimate
Costs .
Determine
Budget .
Control Costs.
.
.
.
2
, ,
.
.
:
.
.
.
3
: 1-7
.
: 2-7
.
: 3-7
.
4
.
5
.
6
Design.
Recurring.
Initial acquisition.
Direct costs.
Incurred .
Indirect costs.
Forecasted.
Operation.
Insurance .
Maintenance.
development .
Taxes.
Energy.
Replacement.
Depreciation .
Disposal.
, ,
.
:
.
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
.4
.
.5
.
.6
.
.7
.
.8
.
.9
. .10
. .11
. .12
. .13
. .14
. .15
. .16
:
.
=
+ +
+
(
.)
:) (
, ,
,
.
8
Pricing
is a business decision
that determines how
much to charge for the
product or service
:
.
:
.
. = +
9
Feasibility Study
Includes the methods &
techniques for
determining:
Technology feasibility
(Sources, Selection,
Support, Etc).
Marketing feasibility
(markets, methods, etc).
Economic feasibility study
(capital costs, operation
costs, depreciation,
interest rate, economic
return, etc).
Environmental impacts.
Capital Costs :
Purchasing an equipment/asset with a useful life
more than one business cycle ( Usually one year).
:
, (
.)...., ,
, (
. )..... ,
, (
, ,
. ) ,
.
:
/
. ) (
10
Project Overhead
(Indirect) Cost:
Examples : Supervision and
Project Electricity.
Company Overhead
(Indirect) Cost:
Examples : CEO Salary, Office
Supplies and utilities, Taxes,
Insurance, and Office Rent.
:
, , :
,
.
) (
:
:
.
) (
:
, :
, ,
. ,
11
Fixed Costs :
Not changed as
production changes .
Example : set up cost ,
rental cost .
:
.
, :
. ,
:
.
, :
.
12
:
( ) .
:
( ) .
Variable Costs
Fixed Costs
13
V
F
Production
.
:
.
:
.
14
8
:16
X 9 =16
8,10 = 0,90 .
:
= 32
7,29 = 0,90 X 8,10 .
15
If output is doubled
from 8 to 16, then :
= ) Duration (16th item
9(0.9) = 8.10 Days.
Similarity :
= ) Duration (32th item
8.10(0.90) = 7.29 Days.
Depreciation
) (
For large assets .
Lose value over time .
Two Forms :
Straight line :
Example A $1,000 item
with 10 years useful life (
No saving value ) would be
depreciated at $100 per
year.
Accelerated Depreciation :
Double Declining Balance .
Sum of the years digits .
.
.
:
:
1,0000$
( 10
)
. $ 100
:
.
.
16
:
.
(
. )
.
.
17
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Scope baseline
Project schedule
Human resource plan
Risk register
Enterprise environmental
factors
6. Organizational process
assets
.
.
.
.
.
.
18
Expert judgment
Analogous estimating
Parametric estimating
Bottom-up estimating
Three-point estimates
Reserve analysis
Cost of quality
PM estimating software
Vendor bid analysis
Outputs
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Inputs
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
Outputs
.
.
.
(
)
.
.
.
.
.
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
. .1
. .2
.3
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
19
Expert judgment.
Analogous estimating.
Parametric estimating.
Bottom-up estimating.
Three-point estimates.
Reserve analysis .
Cost of quality .
PM Estimating
software.
Vendor bid analysis.
. .1
. .2
. .3
) ( .4
. .5
. .6
. .7
. .8
. .9
20
Analogous Estimating
Using the actual cost of
previous, similar projects
as the basis for estimating
the cost of the current
project.
Frequently used to
estimate costs when
there is a limited amount
of detailed information
about the project.
Uses historical
information and expert
judgment.
Generally less costly than
other techniques.
It is also generally less
accurate.
) (
) (
.
.
.
.
.
21
Parametric Estimating
Parametric estimating uses a
statistical relationship between
historical data and other variables
(e.g., square footage in
construction) to calculate an
estimate for activity parameters,
such as cost, budget, and
duration.
Can produce higher levels of
accuracy depending upon the
sophistication.
Involves multiplying the planned
quantity of work to be performed
by the historical cost per unit to
obtain the estimated cost.
(
)
.
.
.
22
Bottom-up Estimating
) (
Involves estimating the cost of
individual work packages or
individual schedule activities.
This detailed cost is then rolled
up to higher levels for reporting
and tracking purposes.
The cost and accuracy of bottomup cost estimating is typically
motivated by the size and
complexity of the individual
schedule activity or work
package.
Generally, activities with smaller
effort increase the accuracy of
the schedule activity cost
estimates.
.
.
""
.
.
.
23
Three-Point Estimates
This concept originated with
the Program Evaluation and
Review Technique (PERT),
PERT uses three estimates
to define an approximate
range for an activitys
duration:
Most likely
Optimistic
Pessimistic
) PERT(
) PERT (
:
.(MC) ) (
.( OC )
.(PC)
) PERT(
.
24
PC = Pessimistic cost
EC = Estimated cost
S.D. = PT OT
6
= OT
=EC
= MT
= S.D.
S.D. = PT OT
6
(EC) = OT + 4MT + PT
6
)(EC( -\+ ) =
26
1. Activity cost
estimates.
2. Basis of
estimates.
3. Project
document
updates.
.1
.
. .2
.3
.
27
.
.
.
28
Labor
Materials
Equipment
Services
Facilities
Information
technology
Special categories
such as an inflation
allowance or cost
contingency reserve
,
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
) (
:
.
29
,
.
WBS
Level
Type of
Estimate
Estimating Method
Accuracy
Order of
Magnitude
Parametric
-25% to + 75%
2,3
Budget
Analogy
-10% to + 25%
4,5,6
Definitive
Bottom up
-5% to + 10%
30
Indicates
The value today of future cash flows
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
32
33
Economic Methods
Present Value .
.
Net Present
.
Value.
.
Internal Rate of
Return .
.
Payback Period .
Benefit Cost
.
Ratio.
n = Number of Years
(1+Interest Rate) n
.
n =
. ,
= ) (
n ) + 1(
34
Present Value
. =
.
n
P = F/(1+i) :
. = F
. = i
. = n
F
P
0
1 2
.
.
200 :
, 2
.%10
:
2
P = 200K/(1+01)
= 200K/1.21 = $ 165,289
200
.
35
Payback Period
The point in time at which the
benefits delivered by the
project are equal to the costs
incurred.
Expression like This
investment will pay for itself
in less than 3 years are
common in business and
emphasize the tendency to
evaluate projects &
investment in terms of
payback or payout period.
Two types :
Payback without interest (Time
Value of Money).
Payback with interest.
.
3
.
:
(
.)
.
36
End of
Years
-$1,000
500
300
200
200
200
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
37
: ,
.) NPW NPV(
.)DCF(
( )
:
. =
. =
38
.
.
:
: 1,90
1,90
.
1,90
.
39
Equivalent Receipt =
Equivalent Disbursements
OR
The interest rate that reduces
the present value worth
amount of a series of
receipts and disbursements
to ZERO
Used to examine the return
from a project to see if it is a
good proposition:
Example : IRR = 15%
.
:
%15 = IRR
40
41
IRR
.
.
< IRR
.
:
IRR .
:
IRR
IRR
.
$ 95,000
$ 75,000
Which
Project
Project A Project B
$75,000
$95,000
IRR
%13
%17
17%
13%
16
21
21
Months
16
Months
2,79
1,30
1.30
2.79
42
Net
Present
Value
Payback
Period
Benefit
Cost
Ratio
) (
.
.
43
44
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Cost aggregation
Reserve analysis
Expert judgment
Historical relationships
Funding limit
reconciliation
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.
.
.
. ) (
.) (
1. Cost performance
baseline
2. Project funding
requirements
3. Project document
updates
Outputs
Inputs
.
.
.
.
(
.)
.
.
Outputs
Inputs
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
1 -
4
5
45
. .1
. .2
. .3
.4
.
(.5
.)
. .6
. .7
46
47
: ( )
,
.
(
)
.
Contingency Reserve :
Accounts for future known unknown.
Example : Rework is certain; the amount of
rework is not.
Are normally included in the projects
baseline.
Management Reserve :
Accounts for unknown unknowns
(Impossible to predict).
Using it requires in projects cost baseline.
Reserve Analysis
Budget reserve analysis can
establish both the contingency
reserves and the management
reserves for the project.
Contingency reserves are
allowances for unplanned but
potentially required changes
that can result from realized
risks identified in the risk
register.
Management reserves are
budgets reserved for
unplanned changes to project
scope and cost.
Management reserves are not
a part of the project cost
baseline, but may be included
in the total budget for the
project. They are not included
as a part of the earned value
measurement calculations.
.
.
.
.
.
.
48
( )
.
.
.
.
49
1. Cost
performance
baseline
2. Project funding
requirements
3. Project
document
updates
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
50
( BAC)
.
. S
.
,
.
,
.
51
52
(
)
.
.
.
.
( )
53
.
54
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
55
Inputs
. .1
.2
.
. .3
.4
.
56
Outputs
1. Work Performance
measurements
2. Budget forecasts
3. Organizational process
assets updates
4. Change requests
5. PM plan updates
6. Project document updates
Outputs
.
.
. (TCPI)
.
.
.
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.
.
.
.
.
.
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
1. Project
management plan
2. Project funding
requirements
3. Work
performance
information
4. Organizational
process assets
.
.
.
.
57
. .1
. .2
.3
.(TCPI)
. .4
. .5
. .6
58
) EVM(
.
.
.
.
.
59
60
EVNS
61
Components4Earned Value
4
1.
2.
: .1
.
.
.
.
: .2
.
.
:
.
.
.1
.2
62
Components4Earned Value
4
: .3
.
.
4. Budgeted At
Completion (BAC) : : .4
.
Project budget .
63
Progress Reporting
80 %
20 %
50 %
50 %
20%
15%
* = EV
% * = EV
, = EV
:
2 1
( , .... ) .
.
.
(
) .
( )
% = EV
64
30%
35%
100 %
0 %
Progress Reporting
Tangible Outcome
Discrete Packages
Fixed Formula
(Tasks With 1-2 Planning Periods )
0 %
100 %
20 %
80 %
50 %
50 %
15%
20%
35%
30%
Weighted Milestone
(Tasks With Longer Duration )
Units Complete
EV = % Completed * PV
No Tangible Outcome
Level of Effort
Apportioned Effort
66
CV = EV AC
CV = BCWP ACWP
Bad < 0
Schedule Variance :
()
SV = EV PV
SV = BCWP ACWS
Bad < 0
CPI = EV/AC
Bad < 1
SPI = EV/PV
Bad < 1
67
:
=((
)\ ) * . 100
:
=
.
:
= ((
) \ )
*. 100
68
Cost Variance :
CV$ = EV AC
( - ) Unfavorable , ( +) favorable
Cost Variance % :
CV% = (CV$ / EV) * 100
( - ) Unfavorable , ( +) favorable
Schedule Variance :
SV$ = EV PV
( - ) Unfavorable , ( +) favorable
Schedule Variance % :
SV% = (SV$ / PV) * 100
( - ) Unfavorable , ( +) favorable
:
= (
( (
) * \ 100
.
69
Variance At Completion
:
VAC$ = BAC EAC
( - ) Over Budget
( + ) Under Budget
Variance At Completion
%:
VAC $ % = (BAC
EAC) * 100 / BAC
= (VAC $ /BAC) * 100
( - ) Over Budget
( + ) Under Budget
:
= \
.
(
) :
= *
.
= ( 0,8 )*
0,2 )
70
Schedule Performance
Index :
SPI = EV / PV
; )> 1 (Ahead) ; < 1 (Behind
)1 (On Schedule
Cost Schedule
Performance Index :
1 - CSPI = CPI * SPI
2 - CSPI = 0.8CPI * 0.2SPI
To Complete
Performance
Index (TCPI):
= Work Remaining
/ Budget
Remaining
= TCPI = (BAC-EV) /
(BAC-AC) .
( TCPI)
. BAC .EAC
TCPI
: BAC
TCPI
: EAC
72
( ) :
.1
.2
.3
.4
73
= \ .
( +
) \ .
)) +
) \(
* ).
((+
) \(0,2
* 0,8
)
Estimate To Complete
:
Estimate To Complete
( ETC ) :
= )ETC = EAC AC (Future
)ETC = BAC - EV (Past
( ) .
=
( ).
74
Percent Completed
:
( \ ) *
( 100 ) .
(
) :
= ( \ ) *
( 100 ) .
:
( \ )
* ( 100
) .
75
Percent Completed :
= (EV/ BAC)* 100
Percent (Work
)Completed
Percent Spent (Budget) :
= (AC/BAC)*100 Percent
)(Budget Spent
Percent Scheduled :
= (PV /BAC)*100
)Percent (Time Elapsed
Example To Analyzing
Input Data
PV
Hard Wear
Soft Wear
Other
Total
170,000
175,000
70,000
415,000
EV
AC
140,000
150,000
75,000
365,000
200,000
230,000
55,000
485,000
BAC
400,000
210,000
100,000
710,000
EAC
?
?
?
?
4+
. 8
SV
= - 50,000
COST MEASUREMENTS
CV
= - 120,000
CSPI = 0.66
SV% = - 12.05 %
CV% = - 32.88 %
CSPI = 0.776
SPI = 0.88
CPI
TCPI = 1.53
= 0.75
BUDGET MEASUREMENTS
TIME MEASUREMENTS
EAC (time)
= 9. 09 M.
PROJECT DELAY = 1.09 M.
FORECAST MEASUREMENTS
EAC ($)
- 946,667
VAC ($)
- 236,667
VAC % ($)
- 33.33%
ETC ($)
461,667
- 945,000
- 1,007,727 **
- 235,000
- 297,727 **
- 33.10%
- 41.93% **
460,000
522,727 **
- 929,587 *
- 219,587 *
- 30.93% *
444,587 *
* MINIMUM
* * MAXIMUM
77
MANHOURS / $
Schedule Variance
(SV) = ?
Forecasted Time
Variance
Time Now
4 Months
=?
8 Months
TIME
Estimated Project
78
Duration = ?
MANHOURS / $
Actual Cost ( AC )
= 485,000
Schedule Variance
(SV) = - 50,000
Forecasted
Time Variance
Time Now
4 Months
79
TIME
= 1.09 Months
8 Months
9.09 Months
PV
4,000
2,000
6,000
4,000
EV
5,000
1,500
3,600
800
. 4
:
.
( )
.
. S
AC
3,000
1,600
3,000
1,000
CV
2,000
100600
2002,300
Favorable
SV
1,000
5002,4003,2005,100Unfavorable
80
Equation
Indicates
Schedule Variance
SV = EV - PV
Good if >=0
Cost Variance
CV = EV - AC
Good if >=0
SPI = EV/PV
Good if >=1
CPI = EV/AC
Good if >=1
Estimate at Completion
EAC = BAC/CPI
Actual cost
Estimate to Complete
ETC = EAC AC
Variance at Completion
Good if >=0
81
=<0
SV = EV - PV .
=<0
CV = EV - AC .
=<1
SPI = EV/PV .
=<1
CPI = EV/AC .
(
)
=<0
(
EAC = BAC/CPI
) .
(
ETC = EAC AC
) .
(
VAC = BAC - EAC
) .
82
Performance Reviews
Variance
analysis
Trend analysis
Earned value
performance
.
.
.
83
Variance Analysis
Cost performance
measurements
(CV, CPI) are used
to assess the
magnitude of
variation to the
original cost
baseline.
(CV, CPI)
.
84
. .1
. .2
.3
.
. .4
.5
.
. .6
85
$ 2290
7 Management Reserve
$ 90
6 Cost Baseline
$ 2200
5 Contingency Reserve
4 Project Estimates
3 Control Account Estimates
2 Work Packages Estimates
$ 180
$ 2120
CA 1
CA 2
$ 920
$ 1200
WP 1
WP 2
WP 3
WP 4
$ 270
$ 250
$ 400
$ 550
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
A6
$ 25
$ 75
$ 110
$ 60
$ 120
$ 130
1 Activity Estimates
86
Questions?
87