340.

124

CONTRA LEGEM

( ) contra legem .
. . , ,
contra legem .
,
, contra
legem . a, o
.
: . .
Contra legem . .

1.
contra legem ,
.1 ,
,

,
bovan@ius.bg.ac.rs.
1
contra legem ,
,
:
Klaus Riebschlaeger, Die Freirechtsbewegung. Zur Entwicklung einer soziologischen Rechtsschule, Berlin 1968, 105.

95

 , LX, 2/2012

,

contra legem .
contra legem
(. , . ).2 ,
,
.
. . : ,
, , ,
, -
.3 ,
,
,
.4
, contra legem
. .
.
,
.5 , ,
contra legem,6
. :
(Der Kampf un die Rechtswissenschaft) K (Die Contralegem Fabel) :
,
( ),
.7 ,

contra legem .
2

:
Zoran Pokrovac, Herman U. Kantorovi i slobodnopravni pokret (doktorska disertacija),
Split 1995, 212216.
3
Manfred Rehbinder, Die Begrundung der Rechtssoziologie durch Eugen Ehrlich,
Berlin 1986, 92.
4
Ibid., 93.
5
Z. Pokrovac, 202203.
6
Ibid., 210.
7
Ibid., 211.

96

 . (. 95116)

,
.8
, . , , . contra
legem?
,
contra legem .
,
,
.9 , ,
. ,

.10
contra legem ,

.11
,
, ,

.12 , :
, , ,

.13
contra
legem . , , 8

Ibid.
, , 2006, 34.
10
Ibid.
11
. ,

, Z. Pokrovac, 202. , ,
, , . , 34.
, , contra legem
, .
12
. , 34.
13
Ibid.
9

97

 , LX, 2/2012

.
,

,
contra legem
, ,
. ,
,
,
.
,
contra legem
, . ,
(
), , , , - .
,
,
,14

( 14

( , . , 910)
( , , 3940). ,
, .
(. , . ),
. Z. Pokrovac, 160.
, . ,
. , ,
,
,
. : , , II, 1994,
444445. Dietmar Moench, Die methodologischen Bestrebungen der Freirechtsbewegung
auf dem Wege zur Methodenlehre der Gegenwart, Frankfurt/Main 1971, 88.

98

 . (. 95116)

, )
.15
,
, , :
,

, ,
:

, , , ,
.16
, .

:
,
. , ,17 ,
:
,
. ,

, .18
, ,
.
.19 ,
( ),20
: ( )
( ).
15

K. Reibschlaeger, 106109, D. Moench, 8687, 90.

. , 22.
17
Ibid., 30.
18
Ibid.
19
:
, . Ibid.,
109.
20
Ibid., 24.
16

99

 , LX, 2/2012

, ,
,
.21 ,
( )
() , ,
.
(
). ,
: , , .22

contra legem
,
XIX XX .
. ,
,

.23 ,
, -
,
,
() ().
Rechtsstaat.
, , ,

.24

,
(nomos basileus).25
,
, .
21

Ibid., 38.
Ibid., 39.
23
: . , 360362.
24
Ibid., 363.
25
nomos basileus (
) : , ,
2003, 1011.
22

100

 . (. 95116)

, , ,
,

.
, ,
,
.

contra legem .
, ,

.
, ,
,
, contra
legem . ,
: , ;
,
;26 ,
, ,
, contra legem; ,
,

.27
26

.
( ),
e, . , , , , 1983, 88.
27
.
1904. .
(, , , .), . . , 440.
, . ,
: , , , , , , ,
1996, 178. , . 2008/2009. ,
.

101

 , LX, 2/2012

( , ),28 ,
contra legem .


.
contra legem.

( ) .
,
,29
,

. contra legem
(
1911. ) ,
,


.30
,

. , ,
.31

, , Winfried Hassemer, Juristische Methodenlehre und richterliche Pragmatik,
Rechtstheorie 1/2008, 18. ,
, . , ,
, II, 1997, 251.
28
.
( ) ,
. , 180.
29
. , 34.
30
Ibid., 91.
31
Z. Pokrovac,
208.

102

 . (. 95116)

, ex lege,
contra legem
( ). ,
, , .32


,33 , ,
.34
, ,
, , .
,
,
.

. ,
contra legem
,
, .
,
.35
contra
legem ,

.
32

. , 34.
, , 89, 91
, Hermann Kantorowicz,
Die Contra legem Fabel, Deutsche Richterzeitung 3/1911, 259, 262263.
34
Ibid., 259.
35
contra legem , , -
. : Regina
Ogorek, Richterkonig oder Supsumtionsautomat? Zur Justiztheorie im 19. Jahrhundert,
Frankfurt/Main 1986, 366.
33

103

 , LX, 2/2012

2.
CONTRA LEGEM
, -
. , . ,
(Wille des Gesetzes).36
. ,
,
( ex nunc), . -
.37 .
.38 ,
. ,

.39

. ,
. ,
, ,
(,
, , .).40 , ,
, .41 , ,
36
Karl Larenz, Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, Berlin-Gottingen-Heidelberg 1960, 237.
37
Reinhold Zippelius, Juristische Methodenlehre, Mnchen 2003, 22.
38
, , 2011, 3132.
39
, , 2001, 287. , () .
. , , ,

, ,
, 2008, 294.
40
K. Larenz, 239.
41
K. Larenz, 239240.

104

 . (. 95116)

. , ,

. ,
, ,

.42

. ,

().
. , Rechtstheorie
2008/2009 , .

,
.43
, .
, .44
, -
.45
, , -
.46
.

, .47
.
, ,
(Auslegung),
(Einlegung),48
42
43
44
45
46
47
48

. , 3940.
W. Hasemmer, 3, 5.
Ibid., 7.
Ibid., 19.
Ibid., 10.
. , 180.
Bernd Ruthers, Methodenfragen als Verfassungfragen, Rechtstheorie 3/2009,

262.

105

 , LX, 2/2012

.49 :

. .
. ,
.
.50
,
,51 , ,
, ,
.
. (. ), (. ),
,

, , , ( , ),
,
,
.52 (phronesis), (tehne), ,
.53
- contra legem
.
, ,
. , ,
contra legem,
,
49
Ibid., 262, 274, 275. .

, . , 147, 168.
50
B. Ruthers, 262.
51
,
XX BverfGE 1, 299 (312).
52
, ,
,
1/2012, 83106.
53
. , .

106

 . (. 95116)

.

,
.

. , , contra
legem ,
.

3.
CONTRA LEGEM

.

.
.
. ,
,54

.55 ,
,
,
.56


.57 , ,
,
.
: 54

, , 1980, 287288.
Ibid., 288.
. , , -
, , 1987, 114.
, , 1981, 143144. ,
, . , ,
1951, 19: , , 1998, 29.
56
. , 4445.
57
Ibid., 290.
55

107

 , LX, 2/2012

,
, ,
,
.58

, ,
, , , , ,
.59

, . ,
, , , , .60

,61
()
, ( ).
,
, ,
, -
contra legem . ,
, ,
,
,
.
, ,
, ,
,
( ). ,
post factum, , -
. 58
59
60
61

108

Ibid.,
Ibid.,
Ibid.,
Ibid.,

288.
288289.
289.
287.

 . (. 95116)

contra legem , , ,
,

. , ,
. , ,
(
, ).62
,
contra legem ,
.
, ,
,
.
,
,
, ,
contra legem .
( ) (
) contra legem
.

. ,
, ,

.
.
.

.
62

,
. , ,
, . Ibid., 282287.

109

 , LX, 2/2012

. , (
: , , , .)
. , ,
. ,
, contra
legem , ratio legis ,
.
,
- .63
,
, ,

. (
), contra legem
. , ratio legis , ,


( ,


, . ).
- . .
.
, , , , , ,
. .64 , ,
, .65 - ,66
63
64
65
66

110

. , 104106.
Ibid., 44.
Ibid.
Ibid., 4346.

 . (. 95116)

, ,
contra legem ,
,
( , . ,

). ,

.
, ( , . ). - . , , ,
.67

4. CONTRA LEGEM

contra legem ( )
: ,
, , contra legem (
) () .

.
. 60- XX ,

. , .
,
, , , .
() 67

Ibid., 40.

111

 , LX, 2/2012

.68
:
, .
, , ,
.69


.70
,

,
. . 1
() 1912.
, 10 () 1934.
. . 1 . 2
, ,
,
, . ,
, .
. - .
.
1 ,71
,72
,
.73
. 4 . 10 , . 8
(),
68
A. , 165. ,
. , ,
1/2009, 2553 2/2009, 2954 ,
,
1/2010, 66107.
69
. , 178.
70
Ibid., 181.
71
Arthur Meier-Hayoz, Der Richter als Gesetzgeber, Zurich 1951, 122.
72
Ibid., 203.
73
Ibid., 206.

112

 . (. 95116)

,
, contra legem .74
(
), ,
contra legem ,
,

- .
, 2007. (. 606/06),
(contra legem) . 201. ()
. , :
, . (.
1628/05 31.8.2005) . ( ,
)
.
. 201 ,

.
-
. 8
.75
, contra legem , .
74
, . .
contra legem , ,
, 34/1928; . , , 1993, 41.
75
-
. ,
. 9, . 1 ,
. , . 9, . 3

( ) . ,
, - , , ,

, .

113

 , LX, 2/2012

( )
. , - (
ratio legis), .
, contra legem,
.

(. 2917/05) . 15
() 1990.

.
, . 15, . 2 3 .
-
( 1966. ), . 12
. , contra legem ,
.
. 60, . 5 1990. ,

. , . 60 1990 . 15 1990. . 12
1966. , contra legem .
,
contra legem ,

. 15, . 5 1990. . ,
( ),

.
contra legem
- , (ratio legis),
. ,
,
, .
, contra legem , --

114

 . (. 95116)

, , .
contra legem
,
. ( ), contra legem , ,
, .

contra legem
. ,
, ,
, . ,
,
. contra legem

. , .
( contra legem ), ,

. ,
,
.
,
, . . ,
. ,
,
contra legem .76
76

, ,
, 1996, 7698. , . Claus-Wilhelm Canaris, Die Feststellung von Lucken im Gesetz, Berlin 1964,
180188.

115

 , LX, 2/2012

Dr. Saa B. Bovan

Associate Professor
University of Belgrade Faculty of Law

CONTRA LEGEM DECISION MAKING THE PANDORAS

BOX OF LEGAL HERMENEUTICS
Summary
The author examines the relation between the reality of contra
legem decision making and the necessity for a methodical articulation of
this form of judicial work. Contra legem decision making is analyzed as
a method of the least painful and the most rational dealing with the value
based discrepancies, which derive from the instances of relatively similar
social relations being regulated differently. The author offers examples
of the contra legem decision making of the Supreme Cassation Court of
Serbia.
Key words: The movement of free law (la libre recherche du droit,
Freirechtsbewegung). Freedom as a method of interpretation of law. Contra legem decision making. Radbruch's
formula.

116