Positive
Gene
Tere Ge ee
Cone ante nts)
Snr a Cates
Geena cs em
Srna ay
eee
Se ee eer et
rere Rte ct
7
Bere 5“Tve been called a radical thinker! ad
mits Tobin, nursing a steaming mug of tea
while sitting in the conference raom of his
office. "But I consider myself an optimistee
realist”
An accomplished authat. Tia has eom-
sulted with seores of nonprofits and foun-
dations, and speaks on a range of topics,
from philanthropy to religious stereotypes,
\With his graying beard and inquisitive ex-
pression, heloks a great deal likeaollege
professor,
{As well he should, Tobin does indoed
have strong ties to academia, He spent Lt
years the faculty of Washington Univer
sity in St, Louis, where he was born and
grew up, He then spent 14 years of Bean:
dots University. where Ine was the director
‘ofthe Maurice and Marilyn Cohen Conter
for Modern Jewish Stuties
‘Tobinis among the most unusual afacar
sdemics—he chase te leave a tenured post
ton to ereate his owe think tank, the In-
stitute fr Jowish & Community Research.
He says itwas “something of a risk’ but he
wanted the time and freedom to pursue
the most cutting-odge issues in Jesh life.
He has kept his connection to the univer-
sity world as a current senior fellow with
Lie Baylor Institute for Studies of Religion.
‘Tobin grew up as.an assimilated Reform
Jew, but sith «strong affection for Israel
ancl all things Jewish. Today he belongs
to both a Conservative and an Orthodox
synagogue, The institute bas regular
study somninars with Rabbi Shlomo’Zarchi,
aseventh.generation Hasidic rabbi.
Somehow, it seems fitting that Tobin's
Institute fe headquartered tn Northern
California. an area notorious for attracting
progressive thinkers. Yet, the impact of Bis
research extenels far beyond the San Fran
‘isco Bay Area, home to: the thirdhlargest
Jewich community in the country. Jewish
‘community leaders across the globe fre-
_quontly take notiew of the findings coming
‘out of Tobiis institute. an independent.
onpartican think tank that provides in-
navative research and pragmatic policy
analyses,
‘Tobin runs the institute with his wife,
Diane Kaufimann-Tobin, who serves. as
associate director. The couple live in San
Francisco and have six children, five of
whom are grown and out of the house,
‘Their youngest is 10-year-old Jonah, an
African-American bboy who was adopted
a
«asa baby through the local jewish Family
‘& Childrens Services Adoption Connce-
tion program,
“Jonakis birth mother chose us as par-
cents, and wewere all together when he was
born? recalls Kaufinann-Tobin recall fone!
ly. A striking, woman with green eyes and
‘aubwarn hair lve met and fell in Jove with
‘Tobin after hearing him speak at aconfer=
cenece."I was intrigued by is optimisen she
says smiling at her hneshand,
‘Today the two are nearly inseparable
working sede by side in their research on
‘behalf ofthe Jowish community. Together
they lead the institute in its intensive work
examining philanthropy. religious preji-
dice, and the security of the Jewish €0ns-
munity.
‘ne of the institutes most widely read
research reports about Jewish philan-
thropy shows a growing trend in giving to
philanthropies outside the Jewish com-
munity, Tobin cites evidence that Jewish
philanthropists are more
likely to make their largest
Bits to non Jewish causes.
‘According to his research,
megagilts of $10 million,
$8100 million. er even more
from Jews to on-Jewish
‘organizations are not un.
‘common. “It shauld come
ss no surprise’ says Tobin,
“given how Americanized
Jews and their philanthra-
pyhave become:
Tobin describes haw Jewish charithes
are generally failing to attract financial
support from Americas wealthiest and
‘mast philanthropic Jews. ln January, Fobin
released a report showing that Jews ac:
‘counted for 16% (or about 1,600) ofall gifts
of81 million-or more donated to nonpeotit
organizations between 2001 and 2003. But,
only S%afthe $10 million-plus giftsby Jew:
{sh donors went to Jewish groups.
Interestingly, Tobin believes. the low
rate of “megayifis"to Jewish organizations
does not reflect poorly on the generosity of
Jewish donors, their genera level of giving,
1s om par with their wealthy non-Jewish
neers, However, says Tobin, Jewish ongani-
zation are not effectively reaching out to
‘the uitra-wealthy.
“They Ihave not capitalized on Jowish
wealth, While universities, museums, and
hospitals have dedicated resources to per-
tior
TOBIN belie
bianco
in Americar
Cera) =i
fecting the art of courting the megagih.
Jewish groups have failed to-de-so."On t
‘ther hard. Tobin acknowledges that Jews
fare increasingly drawn to the causes and
institutions of secular saciety.except when,
faced with an external threat. Support for
Israel. for example slinked tothe need for
self-protection.
Tobin also recently made waves whon be
released a study citing the need for Feder
tions toundergo radical reformation they
age to remain the dominant force in Jewish
philantirops. A policy paper released by
Tobin's institute challenged fexierations to
‘sk hard questions about their mission,
purpose, and aperations, and examine ty
“nuts and bolts, structure, and mechanics
ofthe federations themselves"
Describing it as a “wako-up call? Tobin
explains that federations awe it to d
selves and the Jewish community they
‘serve 10 take a haner look at how they
‘do business, the problems they have, and
family founda.
eM eu scsR ae
ortant institutions
Tm}
what they can do dillerently and better
rritique fr not the same as condemna-
jon? Tobin emphasizes. We want federa-
tions to do better precisely beeause they
portant”
‘Among, his areas of concer was the
question of why more and more federa-
tions are losing control of their endaw-
ment Funds as they become quasi-inde-
pendent catities or conipletely separate
‘organizations. He also addressed the issue
‘of umbrella giving. considerod outmacded
lby some. Tobin argues that umbrela.
ing serves an important function, “We stil
rnced the ability ta raise money for both ev
exyday and emergency purposes”
ON ANOTHER TOPIC IN JEWISH PHIL-
anthropy, ‘Tobin believes Jewish family
Toundations have emerged as one of the
ost important institutions in American
Jewish life, He motes that they fund both
spring 2008 | 133.GARY TOBIN
the exis
1g Jewish communal infrastruc
ture as well as provide soed money for i
ovative programs. They interact with all
other existing institutions, including UJA.
Federation, synagogues, Jewish human
service agencies, cultural institutions, and
the State of Israck, Moreover. they are just
beginning to grovs, “While billions of dal:
lars have flawed into these foundations
‘over the past few years” says Tobin, “itis
but a trickle of what is expected to take
place over the next decade”
Because Jewish family foundations are
new and evolving phenomenon, says
Tobin, they are less structured than ex:
verse evelving” as
‘explaining that despite their
guick growth, m
be relatively unsophisticated considering
thevast amounts of money being distri
uted through them, According to Tobin,
most Jewish family foundations dev not
yot have formal application procedures,
gublelines, or consistent methods af
‘grant-making,
Tobin says this will change over time
as they become more structured, Jewish
ving by family foundations cane found!
along a spectrum—fror those who be:
jeve they are being “most Jewish" when
giving to specifically Jewish instis
{particularistic) to those who believe in
directing maney te general causes (uni
vversalictic)
Im many casos, parents establish foun
ations with the intention of eaducating
‘their children about Jewish philanthropy,
sand preparing them forthe responsibility
they will have in the future. They hope it
will keep them connected to the Jewish
ommunity and serve asa nears te build
thoi individual Jewish identity
Tobin's expertise has made him a
sought-after resource to major philan:
thropists and foundations. It is doubtful
that an
‘work with more of the Jewels
one has advised and continues to
ts wealthiest individuals than Tobin has
lover the past 20 years.
Tobiris institute has also been very
active in dealing with the Issue of anti
iam and anti-leraelise 01
Americas
college campos, Tobin's book The Cnc
‘University. weriten along with Aryeh Wein
berg and Jenna Fever, examines
ideology and expression of antisemitism
‘nd anti tsrackism i the American higher
134 I sprinc. 2008
‘education system is hidden under the re
brie of “legitimate” criticise of Israel.
Tobin testified at a hearing before the
US, Committee om Civil Rights in 2005,
thestirst tie it had examined the isse-of
antisemitisen on campuses. Their ndings
noted, “Many college campuses theowgh-
(out the United States continue to expe
cnce incidents of antisernitism. 1
serious proble
Which warrants further
attention. Antisemitie bigotry is ne loss
morally deplorable when camouflaged as
ant-israelism or anti-Zienism
SWITCHING GEARS, AND MOVING ON
to thecontroversialtapice
intermarriage
sand conversion, Tabia concedes that his
view is one that isnot always popular in
the Jewish community: Tobin shook th
10 years ago, he wrote
How Proactive Comer.
the Jewish Carumanty.
He staked out a new position for Jewish
10 “quit. warrying about how
many Jews we lose through assimilation
and to start actively pursuing how to grow
the Jewish papolation through carver
DIANE KAUFMANN-TOBIN is the
founder and director of Be’chol
Lastron (In Every Tongue), @ research
‘and community-building initiative of
the institute that seeks to grow and
‘strengthen Jews through ethnic, cul
‘tural, and racial inclusiveness. With
personnel and partners across the
United States, as well as in Latin
‘America, Europe, and Africa, Be’chal
Lashon calls for an intercultural un-
derstanding of the Jewish people.
“That diversity is our strength and our
future,” says Kaufmann Tobin,
Kautmann-Tobin is passionate
about the way diversity. strengthens
the Jewish people. “Imagine a new
global Judaism that transcends differ-
ences in geograpty, ethnicity, class,
age, ritual practice, and beliefs. Dis-
cussions about who /s a real Jew will be replaced with celebration
of the rich, multidimensional character of the Jewish people.”
Kaufmann Tobin believes in the potential to change the tradi.
tional debate over the future of Ametican Jewish life. “We have
-always been diverse. The historical home of the Jows lies at the
eographic crossroads of Africa, Asta, and Europe, Jews are an
amalgam of many peoples, and Jewish origins include a multitude
‘of languages, nations, tribes, and skin eolors,”
The Abayudaya of Uganda are one of the many Jewish com.
munities around the world in partnership with the institute. At
the request of the Abayudaya leadership, the institute Is working
‘with its community to improve the deli
ry of water, electricity, and
medical care to all residents of their subcounty—Jewish, Chris-
tian, and Mustim,
ttesrytom maga