Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2004/2005
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: -
: -
:
:
: -
: .
: .
Quality
() (
)
.
.
(
) W. Shewart Quality Control QC
( )
( ) .
4
????? ?????
?????
??????
9001 14001
. .
.
:
.1 : Degree of Superlative :
Superlative
.
.
.2 : Fitness for use :
" "
) .
.
.
.
6
.a :
:
Focus
Customer
( )ASQC
( )EOQC "
" (.)Dilworth,1992,609
( )Feigenbaum "
" (. )Fisher & Barry,1996:5
Preventative Corrective
(.)Crosby,1999:12
( )Taguchi "
"
7
(. )Barod,1989:447
( )ISO "
( )ISO 9000:2000: p.7
ISO 9000
ISO
( )Taguachi ISO 14000
.
.
( ) 1
( : ( )11-6 :1999 ) ,20001 :26-24
: : 1940 -
.1
.2
.3
.4
(
( ) Dale , 1997: 13
.
: 1960-1940
.1
( Ross, 1995:
. ) 146-147
.2
.3
( Krajewski
.4
10
.
: 1980-1960
.1
.2
Zero Defect
.Crosby
.3
11
.4
( ) Quality Assurance
: 2020-1980
.1
.
.2
( . )Dale,1997:24
.3
ISO 9001
( . ) 25:1998
12
1940
(Value-
) Total Customer
.
( ) 1
.
13
( )
.
.
.1 :
:
.
ii
: Performance : .
/ : Appearance / Features :
.
iii
: Reliability:
.
iv
: Conformance :
.
: Durability : .
.
: Serviceability :
: Aesthetics : .
vi
.
vii
viii
Perceived Quality :
.2 :
i
: Time : .
14
: Timeless : .
: Completeness : .
ii
iii
iv
: Courtesy : .
: Consistency : .
.
: Convenience : .
: Accuracy : .
vi
vii
viii
: Responsiveness :
.
( ) 2 .
( )2
.1 :
Performance
.1 Reliability :
.
.2 Responsiveness :
.3 :
Competence
.2 Features
.4 Access :
.5 Courtesy :
15
.3 Reliability :
.
.4 conformance :
.5 Durability :
.6 :
Communication
.
.7 credibility :
.8 Security :
.
.6 Serviceability :
.9 .Understanding :
.10Tangibles :
.7 Aesthetics :
.
.8 Perceived :
Quality .
: :
( ) 2 :
.
. . . . .
:
.
.
16
.
.
( ) 2
:
*
:
*
*
17
:
*
:
*
( ) 3
:
.
ii
.
iii
:
.
ii
/ .
18
iii
iv
/ .
. )Dilworth , 1996:611) ( Schonberger , 1997: 54 ( :
.1 . Prevention cost :
( )
.2 . Appraisal Cost :
.
.
(. )4
( . )5
( ) 4
.
20
?????? ?????
( ) 5
????? ?? ????
?????? ??????
21
.
(C W Q C ) Company Wide
. Quality Control
1985
( )Stockholders ()Stakeholders
.)(ISO9004,2000:4
ISO/TC 176
22
( )TQM
ISO 9000 (
( )ISO9004,2000:4-5) (BSI,2000:6 .)38-46 :2000
: )Customer Focus( :
.
: )Leadership( :
: )Involvement of People( :
( )Essence
.
: )Process Approach( :
: )Continual Improvement( :
.
: :
: :
ISO 9000
. ) Aroar: 1996:84 ( .
ISO 9000
:
.1
.2
.3
ISO 9000
( Deming
Baldrige
Malcom
.
24
( ) Compatible
ISO 9000
) Own & Cothran: 1994: 262 ( .
ISO 9000
) Corrigan: 1994:33 ( .
ISO 9000
( )Weston.: 1995:68
ISO 9000
( . ) Lal:1996:205
ISO 9000
ISO
9000 .
:
25
.1 ( ISO 9004-1
).
.2
.
.3 .
.4 .
.5 ( . ) SPC
.6 / ( . ) JIT
.7 .
.8 .
.9 ( . ) QFD
.10
.
ISO 9000
/
.
ISO 9000
. ISO 9000
ISO 9000
Charif & jalal: ( .
) 1995 : 466
ISO 9000
ISO
26
,
.
27
.1 : Armand Feigenbaum
( ) TQC
( )1950
Massachusetts
( )20
( )25:2001 :
.1 .
.2 1900-1918 .
.3 1919-1937 .
.4 1938 -1960 .
.5 1961 .
( . )S lack , 1998:761
.3 . Edwards Deming
.4
28
( )1947 ( Shewart
) .
Deming
( )
Deming
:
.1 :
.
.2 :
.
.3
.
.4
.5 :
.
.6 :
29
.7
.
.8 :
.9 :
.10 :
.
.11 :
.
.12 :
.13 :
.
.14 :
30
Slack , ( .
.) 1998 :762
.3
Joseph Juran
:
( ) 94:2000
.
Quality Planning
( )
.
. . Quality Control
ii
.
. . Quality Improvement
iii
( )
( )Slack , 1998:762
.4
Kaoru Ishikawa
) Quality Circles (.
31
) Cause Effect ( .
""
"" C W Q C .
"" "" T Q M
.5
. Genichi Taguchi
. "" (
"" Q L E
.6
Phillip B. Crosby
Crosby :.
.1 :
.
.2 :
.3 :
.
.4 :
( .
32
. )249:1998
)
.
( . ) 1998 :96
:
.1 :
.2 :
.
.3 :
33
.
( ) Slack .et.al , 1998:763 T Q M
.1 .
.2 ( ) .
.3 ()
.
.4 .
.5 .
.6 .
( . ) 2001 :66
( . . ) 1999 :14
" "
( :) 1995 :8-7
.1 .
34
.2
.
.3 .
.4
.
.5 .
.6 .
.7
.
.8 .
.9
.
35
?????? ?????
??????? ?????? ????? ???????? ?????
36
( : :9-6
) 2001 ( . ) Goetsch & Davis , 1997:13-17
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .
.5 .
.6 .
.7 .
.1 :
.2 :
( . ) Slack : 1998:778
37
.3 :
.4 : (
) Incremental ( Break Through
)
( ) 68:2001
( : ) Evans 1997: 59
. .
. .
ii
. .
iii
. .
iv
.5 :
38
.6 :
:
( Think
) Tank
( .) Goetsch , 97:17
.7 :
( . ) ,69:1997
39
40
(. ) 2001 :11-9
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .
.5 .
( ) 6 .
....
( . )Horton & Thomas , 1997: 1-2
()6
41
?????
?????? ????????
????????
???????
???????
??? ?????
.2 :
( Slack , 1998:
) 778
.3 :
""
(Hall
) & Torrinton,1998:336
42
. ( :
ii
iii
( )
.
.4 :
.
43
.
.5 :
( : . ) Schonberger & Knod 1997, 54 ( ) 2000 :79-78
.1
/
.
.2
44
.3
.
.4 :
.
.5
(
) .
.6 :
( : ) 2001 :12-11
.1 .
.2 .
.3
.4
.
.5
.
.6
.
.7 .
45
.
Slack , 1998:783-784) ( Shafer & Meredith , ( :
. ) 1998: 92, 96
.1 . Deming
.2 . Malcolm Baldrige
.3 .
: : Deming
. Deming (
) 1951
:
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
46
.
.
: Malcolm Baldrige
.Deming
( :10-9
) 1999
.
.
(
) 600
.
.
47
.
.
.
( ) Ross,1995:13-15
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
/ (
)
( . : 4 ) .
(
: 5 ) ( : 3 )
( :6 )
( : 7 ) . ( ) 7
( .)Waver , 1997.209
48
???????
??????
??????????
????????
?????
???????????
???????
???????
???????
??????
????? ????? ??? ?
?????? ?????? ????????
?????
?????? ??? ????????
49
( ) 7
E F Q M
1993 ( ) 300
( ) E F Q M .
( ) E F Q M :
( ) Slack ,1998:784 ( . ) 8
( ) 8
50
9%
9%
8%
20%
%10
15%
%9
%6
50%
50%
ISO 9000
.
I S O
ISO 9000
( ) Slack ,1998:775
( .) 15:1999 ,
51
I S O
I SO
( ,
) 98 :257 I S O 9000
ISO 9000
. ISO
9000
.
1994
.
( ) 200013 :
ISO 9000
.
World Class Manufacturing
52
.
ISO 9000
. ( ) 2 .
( ) 2
ISO 90001-2000
.1
.1
.2
.2
.3
.3
.4
.4
.5
53
.6
.5
.
.6
.
.7
.7
.
.8
.8
54
????? ??????
????? ????? ?????? ???????
.
.
:
.1 .
55
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .
.5 .
.6 .
.7 .
Pareto Diagram
.
Juran Pareto
56
(
. ) Raju , 1995:37 ( : :48
: ) ,2001
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4
.5
.
.6 .
:
.1
.3
.2
1399
638
241
57
241
10%
2278
2278
100%
??? ???????
638
28%
2037
?????? ???
.1
1399
62%
1399
62%
90%
100%
1400
1050
700
( )900
:
58
103
65
172
27
229
126
71
??
: .
:
103
11%
103
11%
65
7%
168
18%
172
19%
340
37%
27
3%
367
40%
229
26%
596
66%
126
14%
722
80%
71
59
8%
793
88%
???? ???????
??????? ???
?????? ???
??? ????????
????????? ???
??????
107
11%
900
??? ????
100%
??? ??????
250
200
150
100
50
0
60
Cause Effect Diagram
.1 Management
.2 Man
.3 Method
.4 Measurement
.5
Machine
.6 Material
.7 ( ) Milieu
( ) 49:2001
.1 ( )
.2
61
.
.3
.4
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
62
??????
?????? ????? ???????
:
??????? ????????
( )- .
. - .
.63
???? ??????
???????
?????
??????
- .
Process Chart :
( Evan , 1997: 345
).
64
1947
.
.
.
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
65
.4 .
.5 .
. .
.- . .
. .- .
. :
.1 .
.2 .
.3 .
.4 .
.5 .
.6 .
.7 .
.8 .
.9 .
66
.10 .
Check sheets
.
.
463
67
69%
IIII II IIII
157
32
11
2%
1%
670
100%
23%
5%
Graphs
( ) 998 :182
( ) Bar chart -
Line Graph
Pie Chart
Belt Graph
Radar Chart
327
240
176
68
105
90
61
33
50
45
43
1170
: Pie .
. 360
:
100.6=)1170327(360 :
74=)1170240(360 :
52=)1170176(360 :
32.3=)1170105(360 :
28=)117090(360 :
19=)117061(360 :
10.2=)117033(360 :
16=)117050(360 :
14=)117045(360 :
100.6 =)117043(360 :
69
Scatter Diagrams :
.) Raju ,1997: 43(:
.
: :
70
1024
1034
1036
1023
1011
1030
1014
1030
1016
1020
1040
1013
1025
1020
1022
6.7
8.2
8.1
6.6
6.5
8.5
7.4
7.2
5.6
6.3
8
5.5
6.9
7
7.5
1046
1030
1039
1027
1028
1025
1035
1015
1038
1036
1026
1041
1029
1010
1020
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
8.1
7.7
7.4
5.8
7.6
6.8
7.9
6.3
7
8
8
8
7.2
6
6.3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
:
.1 :
= 7.32=30214.1
= 1026.76=3030803
.2 ()
(). .
N2
N1
71
N3
N4
.3 ( ) n1+ n2+ n3 + n4
. .
N1= 11
N2= 2
N3= 12
N4= 3
: = 2
.4 n1, n3 + N
n2. n4 - N
N+ =n 1+ n 3 = 23
N - = n 2 + n 4 =5
28 30
.
N= n+ n- = 23+5 = 28
72
.6 ( ) T 28
:
0.5 = 8
:
= 0.01
6>5=>8
.2 : 0.01 = .
n- < n
6>5
.3 : 0.05.
< = n+ < n
n0.01
6>5=>8
.4 : .
23=>6
= 0.01
n+ < n
( ) 2
.
73
Controls Charts
: .
.
( . ) 2001 :58-57
. .
. .
.
74
( ) R X
( ) X
( ) Range
( . ) Slack ,1998: 659
( :
.1
.
.2 155
.
.3 ( )
:
= =
.4
:
5.1
:
= =
.2
:
.3 -
75
= + 2
= - 2
=
=
:
4
3
\ .
:
4/9
5/9
6/9
7/9
8/9
24
7
37
17
22
12
35
52
28
28
= (20
100
25
20
24
124
26
16
28
144
34
36
40
176
24
36
29
167
48
29
34
=5) 33.4 + 35.2+ 28.8+ 24.8+
= (23 = 5 ) 20+28+28+21+18
= 28.44
= 41.711 = 23 0.577+ 28.44
= 15.169= 23 0.577- 28.44
= 23
76
20
24.8
28.8
35.2
33.4
28.44
18
21
28
28
20
48.645 = 2.115 23 =
= 000 = 0 23
:
UCL
40
40
30
20
15.03
10
26 27
25
24
23
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
14 15
SEP
UCL
40
30
R=21.7
20
10
LCL=0
25 26 27
28 29 30
24
23
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
77
14 15
SEP
(_
) p- Chart
( ) C Chart
Krajawski & Ritzman : ( .
. ) 1999:261
.
.1 .
.2 :
np
=P
N
= np .
=N .
P 3.
:
= P
np
N
. =
78
np
. =
.3 :
p(1-p
)UCL = P +3
N
)UCL = P + 3 p ( 1-p
N
C - Chart :
C
UCL = C + 3
= LCL
C3
( ) 2 ( ) 300
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
12
9
6
6
3
6
3
3
79
= 12
300
?????? ???
?????? ???
/ p Chart
.
:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
P = 12+ 9+ ..+ 3
300*8
48
= 0.02
2400
)P ( 1 p
N
U.C.L= p +3
)= 0.02 +3 0.02(1-0.02
300
U . C . L = 0.044.
)0.02(1-0.02
300
= 0.02-3
80
) p (1-p
N
L.C.L =P -3
0 .
L . C . L = 0.004
0.04
U. C . L =0.044
=P
0.02
0.02
= L.C.L
O
2
.
( : ) 3
( ) 25
} 8,
:
C = 4+6+5++ 2 = 95
25
25
. C = 3.8
= 9.65
0
3.8
= -2.04
= 3.8+3
3.8
= 3.8-3
U . C . L = C +3
C
81
L . C . L = C -3
9.65
3.8
.. 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
25
( ) 1 A2 , D3 , D 4
D3
A2
3.267
2.575
2.282
2.115
2.004
1.924
1.664
1.816
1.777
0
0
0
0
0
0.076
0.136
0.184
0.223
1.880
1.023
0.729
0.577
0.483
0.419
0.373
0.337
0.308
82
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
: .
.1 ( ) 2001
: .
.2 ( ) 2001 I S O
9000 .
.3
8& 3
. 1968
.4 ( ) 1999
:
.5 ( ) 1998 I S
O 9000 .
83
.6 )2000 (
.
.7 ) 1998 (
.
.8 ( ) 2001
- ISO 9000 .
.10 ( ) 2001
.11 ( ) 1995
ISO 9000
.
.12 )1997 (
.13 ( ) 1999
.
: .
Hazier ,J & Render (1996) , Production & Operations
) Management (New jersey : Prentice Hall
Dilworth, James, (1996) Operation Management, 2ed ed. New
York : MC- Graw Hill ).
Evans, James (1997) . production operation Management 5the
ed , (New York : West Publishing co ) .
Russell. R , & Taylor ( 1998) . Operation Management 3d ed .
84
1.
2.
3.
4.
85