UNITES STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DISCOVERY DEMANDS v. DANIEL RILEY, ROBERT WOLFFE, 1:07-cr-189-GZS CIRINO GONZALES, JASON GERHARDT COMES NOW, making a special appearance, Daniel Riley, acting in a sovereign ‘capacity, Sui Juris, not Pro Se repeat not Pro Se representing the fiction DANIEL RILEY, and makes this motion, prima facie. In no way can this motion be construed to grant jurisdiction over the defendant, because the defendant's counsel still contends no jurisdiction exist. In no way should this motion be construed to be considered a contract, ‘and all rights are reserved at the common law UCC 1-308 and 1-103.6 without prejudice. 1. The defendant makes this motion according to F.R.C-P. 16 and local rule 26.1 even though 2 discovery plan or schedule has never been designed by the court, to this defendant’s knowledge, less than a month from the trial 2. The defendant respectfully request the order or directive issued by the USS. Attomey General in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 566 (e)(1)(B) to authorize the investigation of fugitives outside the United States. 3. According to the U.S. Marshals Ed Brown was a fugitive and the defendants in this case were investigated, therefore the U.S. Atomey General in accordance to 28 U.S.C. § 566 (e)(1)(B) had to issue a directive or order for there investigation. The defendant request the directive that was issued in accordance with this statute. If'no directive or order exists, then so state for the record. 4, The defendant respectfully requests the directive given by the Director for U.S. Marshals involved in the above entitled case to carry firearms in accordance with 28 US.C. 366 (a). 5. 28 U.S.C. 566 (d) also states that: “U.S, Marshals....make arrests ........for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States if he or she has reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing such felony.” Cognizable means jurisdiction according to Black's Law Dictionary. The defendant respectfully requests proof to how the U.S. Marshals obtained jurisdiction outof the territorial jurisdiction of the United States and made arrests in Plainfield, New Hampshire and Cohoes, New York. 6. The defendant respectfully requests the authority (law) used by the U.S. Marshals to operate outside their territorial jurisdiction of the United States. Nowhere in the law is there authorization to execute a criminal process inside the sovereign Jurisdictions of the 50 separate countries, one of which is New Hampshire. DATED: Aecember 31, 2007 is) 266 County Farm Rd Dover NH, 03820 All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice CC: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE AUSA Robert Kinsella David Bownes Stanley Norkunas Paul Garrity