مدى فعالية البرمجة اللغوية العصبية في منع الانتكاسة لدى عينة من متعاطي المواد المؤثرة نفسي....

-
. .

-
6002
()11:

"
"

" "
: 11 - 1 ...........................................

1
......................
....
.......
.
...............................

..................
8
....
............................

9

/
...............
....
........................................

9
.........................
.............................

16 -

:

62
...................................................
........................................
/
11 ......................................................................

11 ............................................

.
11
...........

12 ..............................
.
81
- 11

........

...............................................
........
.
- 41 - 11 ...........................
11
.......................
.....
.................
-1

11 ..................................................
-1
.

12
-3 ( ).....................................
- 81 - 41.............................
-1................................................................
41
: 11 - 1 ...........................................
................................................................
..................................................
...........................................................
......................................................
: 62 - 16 ...................................................
........................................
......................................................................
11
............................................
11
...........
11
..............................
12
81 - 11
...............................................................
- 41 - 11 ...........................
-1 .............................................
-1 ..................................................
-3 ( ).....................................
11
11
12
- 81 - 41.............................
-1................................................................
-1 ..................................
-3 ................................................
41
27
21
-1 ........................................................
...............................................
81
81
: 106 - 68 ......................................
........................................................
...........................................
82
171
: 161 - 101 .......................................

.............................................................
179
: ....................................................
: ......................................................
111
: ....................................................
111
-1 .............................
111
-1 .................................. 177
113
111
-3 117 ..
...................................................
113
: 126 - 161 ...................................

.....................................................
111
.............................................
111
.................................................
114
...................................................
141
...................................................
142
: 651 - 121 ........................................

......................................................
121
...........................................................
180
..........................................................
181
.........................................................
186
650 181 .....................................................

-1
971
...................................
-1
188
...........................................
-3
192
...........................................
-1
174
...........................................
-1
111
.........................................
-4
111
..........................................
-2 ..................................
133
-8 ......................................... 177
111
651 - 651 ...................................

.........................................
1-2
11
....................................................................
1
17
.................................................
3
.......
19
..............................
11
.......................................
18
"
13
"...................................................................
2
.........................
87
........
84
111
..................................................
17 177 ...............
111
11 177 .................
118
11 177 ................
137
13 177 ...............
133
11 177 ..............
131
11 177 ...............
138
11
.............
111
.........
112
112
...............................................
1
112
..................................................................
4
..
118
118
....................................................................
8
118
...........................................................................

119
17
119
.........................................................
11 .........................................
119

:

Relapse Prevention

( :6005
.
81)86

Negative Directives

Symptom Removal

.
)(Tierney, 1990:142-143
1111
Prochaska, Norcross, Diclementi, 1994
The Identification Of The Self With The Addictive
process

.
)(Prochaska, et al., 1994: 33

HRS

:
( )1 :
%31 .
( )1 : %14 .
( )3 :

%17 .
(Larimer, et al.,1999: 152).

.
1996:
Wilson,
)306

( 66 :6005)61
(Walton, 2001: 1-
)2

.
)(Gray, 1997: 2-3
Neuro Linguistic Programming

Grinder
Bandler
:
( )1 Satir .
( )1 Perls .
( )3 Erickson
.
)(Sterman, 1990 A: 12

" "

.
( :6001)

.
( 8 :6001 )1

Korzybsky
1933

.
( )16: 6001

Dilts, 1983 1161

.
)(Dilts, 1983 I: 28 & Dilts , Delozier, 2000: 18
Andreas, Andreas, 1987 1168

Blow- Out
.
)(Andreas, Andreas, 1987: 96
1110 Sterman, 1990 A

.
)(Sterman, 1990 A: 11-25

Isaacson, 1990 1110

Six-Step
.Reframe
)(Isaacson, 1990: 27-49

Rapport Skills
Eye Movement Patterns
Linguistic Patterns Pacing .
)Sterman, C., 1990 B: 49-61
)
Davis, Davis, 1983 1983

.
)(Davis, Davis, 1983: 283- 291
Davis, 1987 1168 Anchoring
Reframing

.
)Davis, 1987: 70-71
)

Doorn , 1990 1110

.
(Doorn, 1990: 79-
)89
Six-Step Reframe

1110 Sterman, 1990, C
Sequential Incongruity

(Sterman, 1990 C: 91-103) .
Henman, Henman, 1990 1110

The New Adult Program

.
)(Henman, Henman, 1990: 105- 124
1110 Sterman, C., 1990 D

.
1110
)(Sterman, 1990 D: 125-140

Gardner, 1990

Meta-Programs

))Gardner, 1990: 155 -172

Coping Skills

.
)(Tierney, 1990: 146-147
:
Substances Abuse

Relapse
( .
)15 : 6005

%97 %81 %87 %21

(
.
185 :6005 )186
Neuro-Linguistic Programming

.
:
( )1

( )1
( )3

:
-1
.
-1

.
:
() :Neuro-Linguistic Programming :

:
* .
* .
* .
* .
* .
* .
*
.
* .
( )10 :6001

.
)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 849
1987
"
"
()Ditts, et al., 1980: 12
() Substance Abuse :
DSM IV, 1994
"
.
:
()
:
-1

.
-1
.
-3

.
()
.
)(Wilson, et al., 1996: 276-275
() :Relapse

.
:ALapse
.
)(Beck, et al., 1993: 292

:
NLP

:
-1 .
-1

.
)(Sterman, 1990 A: 12 - 19

.
( )112 -115 :6005
:
Neuro-Linguistic Programming
:
-1 :The Neuro-Part

.
-6 :The Linguistic Part

.
-1 :The Programming Part

.
)(OConnor, Seymour, 1990: 2-3, 26

:
-1 : .
-6 :
.
-1 :
.
)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 849 - 850

.
( )10 :6001
Bandler, Grinder, 1979 "

.
)(Bandler, Grinder, 1979: 77

.
)(Sterman, 1990 A: 13 - 14
:
-1
.
-1

.
-3

.
-1 .
)(Bandler, Grinder, 1975:176

)(Helwing, 2001: 1
:
Jhon Grinder
Richard Bandler

Chomsky
Noam
Alfrd Korzybsky Bateson

Gregory Milton Erickson
Virigina Satir
.Firtz Perls
( )65 :1111
Paul
Watzlawick

.

( )12 - 15 :6001
Santa Cruz *
*

* 1939
.
*" 1917 Eye Witness Of Therapy
1923
.

1921
The Trans Formational grammer Theory

The Structure Of Magic I, II 1975, 1976
1924 1921

Patterns Of The Hypnotic Techniques Of Milton Erickson I, II, 1975, 1977

1922 1921
.
)(Dilts, Delosier, 2000: 460 - 850

*

Leslie Cameron

Judith Delozier
.
1924
1922

* Trance States .
( )11 -16 :6001

)(Helwing, 2001: 2
1981

1994

( )16 :6001

.
( )18 6001

Modeling :
[ ]1 The Cybernetics Theory Of the Mind
-
Robert Dilts .
)(Jelem, Schtz, 1995: 1
*

* 1971
1919 1941

Steps Towards An Ecology Of Mind 1921
( )12 -15 :6001

"

".
)(Bateson, 1979: 122 & Bateson, 1972: 280

( )621 :6001
1943
.1987
( :)1 -
Ncuro- logical levels
Unifield Theory

:
-1 .Neuro- logical levels
-1.
-3 .

()1

( )85 - 81 :6001
[ ]6 Albert Bandura
Modeling

Self - Efficacy Expectation

Bandura Curve

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 82 - 90
.
[ ]1 The Trans Formational Grammer Theory

Time Binding
.

1912

1941 .
( )15 :6001
1941 1912
:
The Deep Structure :
.The Surface Structures
)(Miller, McNeill, 1975: 676

.
( )65 :1161

.
( )181-181 :6001

The Map Is Not The Territory

* Meta-Model 1

.
[ ]1 William James
.

1987
:
Time Lines Accessing Cues

* /

.
[ ]5

.

Parts Party

.
( )50 -11 :6001

:
-1 .
*
1914

.1988
-1
.
-3 .
-1
.
-1
.
-4
.
-2 .
*

1911 1911

1918

1918

.
( )51 - 56 :6001

1971

.1987

Milton Model
- V-K Dissociation
Anchoring
Reframing
Change Personal History Pacing, Leading

.
)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 370, 514
Gordon, Anderson
:
-1 .
-1
.
-3
.
)(Gordon, Anderson, 1981: 183
*

1911

.
( )50 :6001
1893
1914
1911 1919
1949 1927 .
hot seat

.
Modelling
Neuro Linguistics
Programming
.
)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 850 - 851
:

.
( )5: 6001
[ ]1 :

)(Doorn,1990: 82
Tierney, 1990 1110

:
:

.
:

.
:
.
)(Tierney, 1990: 145

.
)(Doorn, 1990: 85
[ ]6 - :
Alferd Korzybsky
The
Map Is Not The Territory
.
*

/ "

".
( )65 :6001

:
( )1 :
.
( )6 : Filter
Generalization
Deletion .Distortion
( )1 :

.
()1

( )11 - 16 :1111

.
( )61 -60 :6001

.
( )661 :6001

)(Sterman, 1990 A: 22
( )160 :6005
[ ]1 :

.
( )66 : 6001

( )611 :6001

) (Tierney, 1990: 144
.

.
( )111 :6001
)(Sterman, 1990 A: 20
[ ]1 :

.
( )121 :6001
Self - Protection

)(Doorn, 1990: 82
[ ]5 :

( )611 :6001
)(Doorn, 1990: 82 - 83

Reframing

.
)(Beahrs, 1982 116
[ ]2 :

.
( )612 :6001
( )11 :6001

.

.
)(Isaacson, 1990: 30

( )161 :6005
)(Davis, 1990: 66
[ ]8 :

.
)661 -661 :6001

.
( )161 :6005

.
)(Sterman, 1990 D: 125 - 126
[ ]6 :

.

( )606 :6001
( )611 :6001
)(Davis, 1990: 65 - 66
( )161 :6005
[ ]1 :

Modalities
Sub modalities

.

.
( )111 161 :6001
:

:

.
( )165 :6005
[ ]10 :

.
( )165 :6005
Miller, 1956 1152

1

.
( )16 :6001

:
-1 .
-1 .
-3 .
-1 .
-1 .
( )11 :6000

Pacing

.
)(Doorn, 1990: 80 - 81
[ ]11
:

.
( )616 -618 :6001

.
( )152 -156 :6001
)(Sterman, 1990 C: 95

.
[ ]16 :
)(Doorn, 1990: 84
( )660 -611 :6001

.
( )116 -118 :6001

Bio-Feed Back

.
)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 126, 840
[ ]11 :

.
( )628 -622 :6001
( )612 :6001

( )166 :6005
.
[ ]11 :
( )621 -621 :
)(Doorn, 1990: 88

( . )161 :6005

:

.

.
:
-1
.
-1
.
: :
[ ]1 Representational Systems

.
)(Lankton, 1980:16) In (Sterman, 1990: 31
Cognition
.
()
()1

.
( )58 - 52 :1111

:
-1 .
-1 .
-3 .
-1 .
( )116 -118 :6001
Mode
Visual
Auditory
Kinesthetic

( .VAK
:1111
)56 - 58
Bandler, Grinder, 1979 1181

Dilts, 1983 II
.
)(Dilts, 1983 II : 8
"
" "
"
.
)(Sterman, 1990 A: 17-18
()1
:Sub modalities

.
( )100 :6001

.
( )166 :6001
:
-1 : .
-6 : .
-1 : .
-1 : .
)(Isaacson, 1990: 31-32

.
( )118 :6001
( )116 :6001
( ):
%2 %38
%11
11-17
1.1 %31
%41 .
)(David, 2001: 75

.

.
( )16 :6001
( )5 :1116
( )11 -11 :6001

( )16-6 :1116
:
( )1 :

%11

.
( )606 :6001
:Eye Movements

.
( )162 -165 :6001
Dilts, 1983 II

.
* .VR
* .VC
* .
* .AD
* .AR
* .AC
* K
)(Dilts, 1983 II: 9
()5

Eye Movement patterns

.

.
( )616 :6001
* :
.
* :
.
* :

( . )115 :6005
* :

( )661 -661 :6001
( )6 :

.
* :

.
* :

.

* :

( )111 -181 :6001

:
-1 .
-1
.
-3 .
-1 .
-1 .
( )11 :6001
[ ]6 :Meta - Model

.
)(Isaascon, 1990: 31
1921

.
)(Dilt, Delozier, 2000: 733

( )66 :6001
:
* : .
* :

.
( )116 :6001

: Generalizations Deletion
Distortion

:
-1 .
-1 .
-3

.

(Andreas, Andreas, 1987: 174) .

:
-1
.
-1
.
-3
.
( )166-168 :6001

The Deep Structure
The Surface Structure

()2
" "
( )111 -116 :6001

) (Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 734
.

.
( )118 -112 :6001
:
() :Deletion

:
-1 :

.
-6 :Comparator

.
-1 :Unspecified Verbs

-1 :Unspecified Referential Index

.
() :Generalization

:
-1 :Universal Quantifiers

.
-6 :Necessity
Possibility :

.
() :Distortion
:
-1 :Mind Reading

.
-6 :Lost Performatives Judgments

.
.
-1 :Complex Equivalence :

.
-1 :Cause - Effect

( )118 -166 :6001

:

( )108 -616 :6001

:

.
( )601 -606 :6001
[ ]1 :Rapport Skills

:
-1 .
-1 .
-3 .
-1
.
-1 .
-4 .
-2
.
-8 .
)(Beck, et al., 1993: 54 - 55

.
)(Doorn, 1990: 79

Sequential Incongruity

.
-1

.
-1 .
-3
.
-1
.
-1

.
)(Baab, 1992: 198

(Bolstad, Hamblett, 2000: 3) .

.
)(Finney, Moos, 1998: 160 & Miller, Rollnick, 1991: 47

.

)(Sterman, 1990 B: 49 - 52
:6001
)156

Meta-Communication .
Yeager, 1985 The Structure of Rapport
"
Pacing
".
)(Yeager, 1985: 57
:
* :
.
* : .
* : .
* : .
* * :Meta - Programs

( )100 :1111
)112-161 118 :6001
)(Doorn, 1990: 82
Pacing

*
: :
-1 .
-1
( . )606 :6001
:
( . )101 :1111

.Leading
)(Sterman, 1990 B: 53- 56
Pacing
)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 909-910
"
" ) .(Cameron, 1985: 34
.

.
)(Sterman, 1990 B: 54
Leading
"

.
".
)(Yeager, 1985: 26
:
-1 :Translating

.
-6 :Tonal Leading

.
-1 :Visual Leading

.
)(Sterman, 1990 B: 57-58
( )160-111 :6001
)(Doorn, 1990: 86

:
-1 :

.
-6 :

.
-1 :
.
-1 :
( )16-12 :6001
.

:
-1

.
-1 .
-3 .
-1

Future Pacing
.
)(Sterman, 1990 B: 59-60
: :
() * :Anchoring

:

.
( )18 :6001
:Anchoring Anchor
1924
.
:
-1
.
-1 .
-3 .
-1 .
-1 .
( )666 :6001

:
-1 .
-1 .
-3
.
-1
.

.

.

.
( )116-161 :6001

( )111-118 :6001
:
-1 :
.
-1
.
-3

.
-1 .
-1
-4
.
-2 .
-8

.
-9
.
( )61-60 :6001

:
-1
.
-1
.
-3 .
-1
.
-1 :
- .
- .
- .
- .

.
-4
.
-2

( )610-611 :6001
.
Anchoring

)(Sterman, 1990 B: 57
.
Dilts, 1983 II

)(Dilts, 1983 II: 44
.

.
)(Yeager, 1985: 27- 28

Davis, 1990

.
)(Davis, 1990: 69-73
[ ]6 :Sub modalities

.
:
-1 .
-1 .
-3 .
-1 .
-1
.
( )116-111 :6001

. .

.
)(Andreas, Andreas, 1992:15
"

".
( )101 :6001

Association Dissociation

.
.

.

.
.
( )601 111 :6001
.
.
.
( )168 :1111
.
.

.
( )58 :6001

.
.

.

.
( )111-111 :6001

( )11-11 :6001
.

:
-1
.
-1

.

Henman, Henman, 1990

Children Within

(Henman, Henman, 1990: 111-112) .
1110
Sterman, 1990 D

:
-1
.
-1 .
-3 .
)(Sterman, 1990 D: 130 - 138

.

.
( )15 - 11 :6001
( )150 -118 :6001
[ ]1 Reframing* :
1921
Watzlawick, et al., 1974
"

" .
)(Watzlawick, etal.,1974:95

Bandler, Grinder, 1982 1166
"
"
) (Bandler, Grinder, 1982: 1
Frames

(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 1071) .

:Reframing
.
)(Gray, 1997: 6 - 7 & 1998: 3 - 4
12 Steps Programs
AA NA

The Model Of Neuro-
Logical Levels

.
)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 9 - 15

,
Survival Skills

)(Sterman, 1990 C: 92 - 93
-1 .
-1
.
-3 .
-1
.Future Pacing

(Dilts, et al., 1980: 97) .

.

:
Contextual Reframing
Contental
Reframing
( )115 :6001
.
( )1 :Contextual Reframing

.
)(Cameron,1978:131
( )6 :Contental Reframing

:
:

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 1063 - 1074
:Six step Reframe
Six-Step Reframe

.
)(Sterman, 1990 C: 95 - 96
.
))Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 1215 - 1217
-:
-1
.
-1

.
-3

.
-1

.
-1 Future Pacing

(
.)1
-4 Ecological State

(
.)1
)(Sterman, 1990 C: 96 & Isaacson, 1990: 32

-3

-2

-5

-1

-4

-6

()8

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 1217-1218

.
)(Sterman, 1990 C: 101- 102
Future Pacing
:
-1 .
-1
.
-3
.

.
)(Bolstad, Hamblett, 2000: 9

The Old
Program

The New Adult
Program :
-1 .
-1
.
-3 .

.
)(Henman, 1987: 184 & Henman, Henman, 1990: 107-109
[ ]1 :

* :Swish pattern

.
)(Andreas, Andreas, 1987: 174 & Master, et al., 1991: 89
:
-1 .
-1 .
-3 .
-1 .
-1 .
)(Bandler, 1985: 178

.
*
)(Gardner, 1990: 165
Integration Of Conflicting Beliefs
System
Dilts, 1987 1168

:
-1 .
-1

.
-3
.
-1

.
-1

.
-4
.
)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000:118 - 120
* :Reimprinting

:
-1

.
-1
.
-3
.
-1
.
-1

.
)(Gardner, 1990: 167

Overdurf, Silverthorn, 1995 A :
-1 .
-1 .
-3 .
)(Overdruf, Silverthorn, 1995 A: 29- 30
* :Imbedded Commands

.
* :

" "
:
-1 :

.
-6 :

.
-1 :

.
-1 :

.
-5 :

.
-2 :

.
-8 Exit :

.
:
-6
Contemplation Stage
-1
-8

Determination Stage
Recyclling
-1
Action Stage
-2
Permanent Exit
-5

Maintenance Stage
()6

)(Bolstad, Hamblett, 1998: 107 - 108

.
)(Sandhu, 1991: 20 - 25

:
[ ]1 1161 :
:
Crandell, 1989 Brief Treatment For Adult Children Of Alcoholics: Accessing
Resources For Self Care:

.
12
.
:
-1 .Meta - Model
-1 Pacing Leading
-3 Representational Systems
-1 Anchoring
.

.
(Crandell, 1989: 510)513
[ ]1 1997
:
Neuro Linguistic Programming And The Family In
Davis, 1990
Alcoholism Treatment

.

.

:
-1 .Meta - Model
-1 Representational Systems .
-3 Pacing, Leading
-1 Anchoring, Swish Patterns
-1 .
Six - Step Integration Conflicting Belief Systems
-4 Sub modalities

:
-1

.
-1

.
-3

.
(Davis, 1990: 63 -
)77
[ ]1 1110
Doorn, 1990 An Application Of Hypnotic Communication To The

Treatment Of Addictions

.

. .

.
:
-1

.
-1

.
)89
(Doorn, 1990: 79 -
[ ]1 1110
Gardner, 1990 Neuro Linguistic Programming Perspective On

Codependency
:
-1
.
-1
.

.

:
-1 .Meta-Programs
-1 .Sub modalities
-3 .Swish Patterns
-1
Six-Step Of Integration Conflicting Beliefs System
-1 .Reimprinting
:
-1

:

Dilts, et al., 1990

.
-1

.
-3

.
(Gardner, 1990: 155 -
)172
[ ]5 1110

CognitivePerceptual Reconstruction In
Henman, Henman, 1990
The Treatment Of Alcoholism

:
-1
.
-1
.
-3 .
-1

12 31 31.

Pacing Guided Imagery
.Reframing
:
-1
The Old Program

:
* .
*
.
* .
-1

.
(Henman,
)Henman, 1990: 105 - 124

[ ]2 1110

Isaacson, 1990 Neuro Linguistic Programming: A Model For

Behavioral Change In Alcoholism And Other Drugs Addiction

.

11 31 14.

:
( )1 : Pacing

Meta-Model
Representational Systems
( )6 :
:
-1 Six-Step Reframe
-1 Anchoring
-3 Sub modalities
-1 Future Pacing
-1 Imbedded Command
( )1 :
.
( )1 :
.Pacing Future

:
) .
)
.

.
)(Isaascon, 1990: 27 - 47
[ ]8 1110

Sterman, 1990 A Neuro Linguistic Programming As A Conceptual
Base For The Treatment Of Alcoholism.

.

.

:
-1 .Meta-Model
-1 .Representational Systems
-3 Eye Movement Patterns
-1 Pacing
:
-1

.
-1

(Sterman, 1990 A: 11 - .
)25
[ ]6 1110
.
Sterman, 1990 B Neuro Linguistic Programming Rapport Skills
And Alcoholism Treatment

.

.
:
-1 Pacing

.
-1 Leading

.

:
-1

.
-1

.
)(Sterman, 1990 B: 49 - 61
[ ]9 1997
Sterman, 1990 C A Specific Technique Effective In The Treatment

Of Alcoholism

Six-StepReframe

.

.
Six-Step Reframe
:
-1

.
-1

.
(Sterman, 1990 C: 91 -
)103
[ ]10 1110

Sterman, 1990, D The Role Of Sorting Mechanisms And Basic
Human Programs In The Treatment Of Alcoholism

Requisite Variety

.

.

:
-1 Leading Pacing
-1 Meta - Model
-3 Meta-Programs

.
(Sterman, 1990 D:
)125 - 140
[ ]11 1110
:
Tierney 1990 Neuro Linguistics As A Treatment Modality For

Alcoholism And Substance Abuse
:
-1
.
-1

.

.

:
-1 .Meta- Model
-1
.
-3 .Swish Patterns
-1 .Sub modalities
:
-1

.
-1

.
-3
-

.
(Tierney, 1990: 141 -
)154
[ ]16 1111
:
Davis, Davis, 1991 Belief Change And Neuro Linguistic Programming

.
37
.
Six-Step
Of Integration Conflicting Beliefs Systems :
-1 .
-1 .
-3 .
-1 .
-1 .
-4 .

.
(Davis, Davis, 1991: 33 -
)44
[ ]11 1111
:
Sterman, 1991 Neuro Linguistic Programming As Psychotherapeutic
Treatment In Working With Alcohol And Other Drug Addicted Families:

.

.

:
-1 .Meta-Model
-1 .Representational Systems
-3 .Pacing
:
-1 .Anchoring
-1 .Sub modalities
-3 .Reframing

.
(Sterman, 1991: 73 -
)85
:
() :

12 :14

.
:
-1 1110 .
-6 1111 .
() : :
: :

.

1110 1110
1110
1111
1161 1110 1110
1110 1110
1110 .1111
() : :
1110
1110

.
1110 1110

.
1110 1111

1110

.
1110 1111

1161

.
1111
1110 1110

1110

.
1110
1110

1110

1110
1110

.

:
-1

.
-1

.

:
The Clinical Method "

".
( )626 :1168
"

( )10 :1168
".

.

.
( )16-11 :1160
( )11 - 1 :1161
)(Robbins, 1994: 1
::
:
-1
.
-1

.
-3
.
: :

:18
37 11.12 :
-1 : 11
177.
-6 : 37

.
-1 : 18
.
-1 : 18 .
-5 : 14

-2 : 11
.
: :

:
[ ]1 :
:
-1 :

.
-6 :
2- Drug & Alcohol History
:

.
-1 :
Social
3-
Condition
:
()
.
()
.
()

.
-1 4- Support Network :
) .
) .
-5 :
5- Pattern Of Daily
Life
:
() .
() .
() .
() .
() .
-2 :
6-
Prognosis

.
-8 :
Case
7-
Summary
(
)6000
[ ]6 :100
:
177

177
:
Unnithan; etal., 1992 Annis, Graham,
1991 Askr, Gundy, 1995
1161 :
-1
11
-6
-3
-1
18
-1
18
-4
11
-2
-8
13
()6
()

.
:
( )1 :

( )6 :

.
( )1 :

. .
( )1 :

.
( )5 :

.
( )2 :

.

.
( )8 :

.
()6 :

.
:
:
117 31
3.18

:
-1 :
1777 31

7.28
-6 :
7.21
-1 : 7.91
: :
: :

7.71 7.71 :.
-1 :
( )3 :
18
65
11
11
16
55
0.22
0.20
0.52
0.58
0.51
0.52
0.21
0.22
21
28
86
88
66
68
11
0.81
0.81
0.21
0.22
0.52
0.25
0.26
-6 :
( )1 :
16
10
0.21 0.55 0.58
62
11
11
16
52
26
0.20 0.86 0.21 0.26 0.25 0.21
-1 :
( )1 :
11
19
12
31
11
17
7.21
7.21
7.13
7.27
7.29
7.41
7.41
-1 :
( )4 :
7.12
11
17
18
34
44
11
15
43
7.19
7.17
7.11
7.41
7.41
7.44
1440
7.43
23
28
83
88
91
11
15
99
7.41
7.41
7.41
7.42
7.41
7.23
48
7.43
7.11 7.42
-5 :
( )2 :
13
19
11
75
11
11
15
04
7.14 7.19 7.11 7.47 7.27 7.43 7.11 7.12 7.18
49
21
29
89
81
93
94
98
177
7.12 7.48 7.41 7.42 7.87 7.43 7.23 7.21 7.41

-2 :
( )8
:
11
11
37
38
14
13
19
7.41
7.41
7.13
7.41
7.12
7.19
7.12
7.44
41
27
21
87
81
97
91
7.11
7.11
7.11
7.47
7.41
7.41
7.49
-8 :
( )9 :
11
13
7.23
7.41
7.41
39
31
7.21
7.81
-6 :
( )17
:
14
11
31
17
12
11
7.11
7.11
7.41
7.13
7.41
7.19
7.19
47
44
21
24
81
84
1450
7.41
7.48
7.21
7.21
7.49
: :

(.)11
( )11
-1

7.89
-1
7.81
-3
7.22
-1
7.97
-1
7.89
-4
7.84
-2
7.24
-8
-9
7.84
7.92
:
- 0.16
7.93 .
( )6005
[ ]1 :

:
-1 .
-1
-3

.
-1 .

.

.

1110

.
:
-1 :

.
-6 :
:
* Six- Step Reframe.
* Anchoring
* Sub modalities .
* Future Pacing
-1 :
.
-1 :

.
( )9 :

()
()

() .
() .
() :
() .
()
() .
()
.
-1.
-1.
-3.
-1


177

11 47 .
-1 :

.
-1 177
.
-3
.

.

.
:
"
".
177

.

.
177
:
: :100

:
* :
* : .
* 22 :
* :
.
* ( )10 100 :
100%
100%
100%
92.30%
85.70%
88.90%
77.80%
80%
60%
60%
50%
40%
20%
0%
()10
( )1 :
%177

.
( )6 :
%88.9

. 177

( )1 :
%81.2

.
( )1 :
%17

.
( )5 :
%22.8

.
( )2 :
%47

.
( )8 :
%177

.
( )6 :
%91.3

.

:

.

.

:
* :
* 37 :
* : .
* :
.
* ( )11 100 :
85.70%
83.30%
60%
53.80%
61.10%
66.70%
66.70%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
()11
( )1 :
%44.2

.
( )6 :
%44.2

.
( )1 :
%81.2

.
( )1 :
%41.1

.
( )5 :
%83.3

.
( )2 :
%47

.
( )8 :
%17
.
( )6 :
%13.8

.

.

.

.

:
* :
* 18 :
* : .
* :
* -
* ( )16 100 :
71. 40%
66. 70%
60%
50%
44. 40%
33. 30%
30. 80%
22. 20%
100 %
90 %
80 %
70 %
60 %
50 %
40 %
30 %
20 %
10 %
0%
()16
( )1 :
%33.3

.
( )6 :
%11.1

.
( )1 :
%21.1

.
( )1 :
%11.1
.
.
( )5 :
%17

.
( )2 :
%44.2

.
( )8 :
%47

.
( )6 :
%37.8

.

.

.

.

:
* :
* 18 :
* : .
* :
* .
* ( )11 100 :
50%
23.10%
50%
26.70%
20%
100%
88.70% 85.70%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50% 46.70%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
()11
( )1 :
%14.2

.
( )6 :
%88.9

.
( )1 :
%81.2

.
( )1 :
%17

.
( )5 :
%17

.
( )2
%14.2

.
( )8 :
%17

.
( )6 :
%13.1

.

.

.

.

:
* :
* 14 :
* : .
* :
* -
.
* ( )11 100 :
94.40%
85.70%
66.70%
66.70%
60%
50%
46.70%
23.10%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
()11
( )1 :
%44.2

.
( )6 :
%44.2

.
( )1 :
%81.2

.
( )1 :
%17

.
( )5 :
%91.1

.
( )2 :
%14.2

.
( )8 :
%47

.
( )6 :
%13.1

.

.

.

.

:
* :
* 11 :
* :
* :
* - -
.
* ( )15 100 :
100%
100 % 93.30%
71.40%
77.80%
80 %
61.10%
44.40%
40%
38.50%
60 %
40 %
20 %
0%
()15
( )1 :
%93.3

.
( )6 :
%22.8

.
( )1 :
%21.1

.
( )1 :
%11.1

.
( )5 :
%41.1

.
( )2 :
%17

.
( )8 :
%177

.
( )6 :
%38.1

..

.

.

.
:100

177 :
-1
.
-1
.
-3
.
-1
.
-1
.
-4
.
: :
: ()1

K

.

11

.
: ()6

VR

K

.

.
: ()1

K

.

.
: ()1

AC AR

.

.
: ()5

.

.
: ()2

K
.

.

:
-1

.
-1

.
:

Shulman, 1989
.
( )Shulman, 1989: 75 .

.
( )61 -60 :6001

.
) (Sterman, 1990 A: 14 - 22

.
(Bandler, Grinder, 1975:
)5

) (Carey, 1995: 237-240

.
)(Castaneda, et al., 1989: 82 & Velten, 1986: 20
)(Tierney, 1990: 144
(Sterman, 1990 C: 91-
)103

.
:
"

".
:
"
".

:

: :
* : 177.
* :

177 177
177
.
:
- .
- .
-
- .
-
.
-

.

11

.
:

.
:

177
.
.
: :
()1

37
.

:
-1 .
-1 .
-3 .

.
:

,

177

.

: :
* : .
* :

.
:
- .
- .
-
- .
-
.
-

.

11
11

.
:

.
:

. .

.
: :
()6

31

.

:
-1.
-1 .
-3 .
-1 .

.
:

. .

: :
* : .
* :

.
:
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
-
.

.
:

.
:

.

.
: :
()1

17

.

:
-1 .
-1 .
-3 .
-1 .

.

.
:

.

: :
* :.
* :

.
:
- .
-
.
- .
- .
- .
-
.

1
.
:

.
:

.
.

.
: :
()1

17

.

:
-1 .
-1 ..
-3 .

.
:

: :
* : .
* :

177
.
:
-
.
-
.
-
.
- .
-
.
-
.

11

11

.
:

.
:

177

.
.

.
: :
()5

11

.

:
-1 .
-1 .
-3 .

.
:

.

: :
* : .
* :

.
:
- .
-
.
-
.
- .
-
.
-
.

.
:

377 177
.
:

.
.

.
: :
()2

11

.

:
-1 .
-1 .
-3 .

.
:

.
:

.

.
( )111 -161 :6001

.

:
-1 .
-1 .
-3

.
)(Sterman, 1990 D: 130 - 138

Survival Skills

)(Sterman, 1990 C: 91 103
.

.
)(Dilts, 1983II: 44

)(Davis, 1990: 69- 73
)2000: 9
(Bolstad, Hamblett,
:

177

.

Childrnen Within

.
))Henman, Henman, 1990: 111 112
)(Crandell, 1989: 510 - 513

:
:
-1

.
-1

.
-3
.
-1

.
-1

.
-4
.
-2 .
:
-1 .
-1 .
-3
.
-1
.

: :
* :6000 .
* :6001
.
* :1116 :
.
* :6001 :
.
* :6001
.
* :1160
.
* :1161
.
* NLP :6001 :
.
* :1160 .
* :1168
.
* :6000 .
* :6005
.
* :6005 177
.
* :1168
.
* NLP :6001
.
* :6001 :
.
* :1111 :
.
* :1161 :
.
* NLP :6001 11 :
.
: :
* Andreas, S.; Andreas, C., 1987: Change Your Mind And Keep The
Change, Real People Press, Moab, Utah.
* Andreas, S.; Andreas, C., , 1992: Neuro- Linguistic Programming
In: S., Budman, M., Hoyt; S., Friedman (Eds), The First Session In
Breifg Therapy, The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 14 - 35.
* Baab, K., 1992: Neuro Linguistic Programming And Hypnosis During
Intervention With Substance Abusing Adolescents, In: G., Lawson, A.,
Lawson (Eds), Adolescent Substance Abuse: Etiology, Treatment, And
Prevention, Aspen Pupblishers, Inc., Gaithersburg, pp. 197 - 205.
* Bandler, R., 1982: Reframing: Neuro-Linguistic Programming And
The Transformation Of Meaning, Real People Press, Moab, Utah.
* Bandler, R. , 1985: Using Your Brain For A Change, Real people

Press, Moab, Utah.
* Bandler, R.; Grinder, J., 1975: The Structure Of Magic Part I,
Science And Behavior Books, Inc., PaloAlto, California.
* Bandler, R.; Grinder, J. ,1979: Frogs Into Princes, Real People
Press, Moab, Utah.
* Bateson, G., 1972: Steps Towards An Ecology Of Mind, Ballantine,
New York.
* Bateson, G., , 1979: Mind And Nature: A Necessary Unity, Bantam,
New York.
* Beahrs, J., 1982: Unity And Multiplicity, Brunnery / Mazel, New York.
* Beck, A.; Wright, F.; Newman, C., Liese, B., 1993: Cognitive
Therapy Of Substance Abuse, The Guilford Press, New York,
London.
* Bolstad, R., Hambeltt, M., 1998: Transforming Communication,
,Longman, Auckland.
* Bolstad, R., Hambeltt, , 2000: Transforming Recovery NLP And
Addiction, www.neurosemantic.com/Articles/Addiction. htm79k.
* Cameron, B., 1978: They Lived Happily Ever After, Future Pace,
Inc., SanRafael, California.
* Cameron B., , 1985: Solution, Future Pace, Inc., SanRafael,
California.
* Carey, K., 1995: Alcohol Related Expectancies Predict Quantity And
Frequency Of Heavy Drinking Among College Students, Psychology
Of Addictive Behaviors 9(4): pp. 236 - 241.
* Castaneda, R.; Galanter, M.; Franco, H., 1989: Self Medication

Among Addicts With Primary Psychiatric Disorders, Comprehensive
Psychiatry, 30, pp. 80 83.
* Crandell, J., 1989: Brief Treatment For Adult Children Of
Alcoholics: Accessing Resources For Self Care, Psychotherapy, Win
Vol 26 (4), pp. 510 - 513.
* David, M., 2001: NLP, Skills For Realizing Human Potential, Prentice
Hall, U. K.
* Davis, D., 1987: Alcoholism Treatment: An Integrative Family And
Individual Approach, Gardner Press, Inc., New York.
* Davis, D., , 1990: Neuro Linguistic Programming And The Family
In Alcoholism Treatment, In: C., Sterman (Ed), Neuro Linguistic
Programming In Alcoholism Treatment, The Haworth Press, New
York, London, pp. 63 - 77.
* Davis, D.; Davis, S., 1983: Neuro- Linguistic Programming And
Family Therapy, Journal Of Marital And Family Therapy, Jul Vol. 9
(3), pp. 283 - 291.
* Davis, D.; Davis, S., , 1991: Belief Change And Neuro- Linguistic
Programming , Family Dynamics Of Addiction Quarterly, Jun Vol.
(2), pp. 34 - 44.
* Dilts, R., 1983: Roots Of Neuro-Linguistic Programming, Part I,
Meta Puplications, Cupertino, California.
* Dilts, R., 1983: Application of Neuro- Linguistic Programming, Part
II, Meta Publications, Cupertion, California.
* Dilts, R.; Delozier, J. 2000: Encyclopedia Of Systemic NLP And
NLP New Coding, www.nlpuniversitypress.com
* Dilts, R.; Grinder, J.; Bandler, R.; Bandler, C.; Delozier, J., 1980:
Neuro-Linguistic Programming Vol. I: The Study Of Subjective
Experience, Meta Publication, Cupertino, Califorina.
* Doorn, J., 1990: An Application Of Hypnotic Communication To
The Treatment Of Addictions, In: C., Sterman (Ed), Neuro-Linguistic
* Finney, J.; Moos, R., 1998: Psychosocial Treatments For Alcohol
Use Disorders, In: P., Nathan, J., Gorman (Eds), A Guide To
Treatments That Work, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 156
- 166.
* Frances, R.; Miller, S. (Eds),1991: Clinical text book of addictive
disorders, the Guilford press, New York.
* Gardner, A., 1990: A Neuro-Linguistic Programming Perspective On
Codependency, In: C., Sterman (Ed), Neuro- Linguistic Programming
In Alcoholism Treatment, The Haworth Press, New York, pp. 155 172.
* Gordon, D.; Anderson, M., 1981: Pheonix, Therapeutic Patterns Of
Milton Erichson, Meta publication, Cupertino, California.
* Gray, R., 1997: Addiction And The Nature Of Meaning: Reframing In
Substance Abuse Treatment, www.temperance.org/nlpAddict/ gray809a
.html.
* Gray, R., , 1998: Addiction And The Nature Of Meaning: Reframing In
Substance
gray809b.html.
Abuse
Treatment,
www.temperance.org/nlpAddict/
* Helwing, D., 2001: Neuro- Linguistic Programming, In: Gale

Encyclopedia
Of
Alternative
Medicine,
Gale
Group,
www.findarticles.com
* Henman, J., 1987: Conscious Competence And Other Paradoxes For
Adult Children Of Alcoholics, Focus, July/August.
* Henman, J.; Henman, S., 1990: Cognitive Perceptual Reconstruction
In The Treatment Of Alcoholism, In: C., Sterman (Ed): NeuroLinguistic Programming In The Treatment Of Alcoholism, The
Haworth Press, New York, London, pp. 105 - 124.
* Isaacson, E., 1990: Neuro-Linguistic Programming: A Model For
Behavioral Change In Alcohol And Other Drug Addiction, In: C.,
Sterman (Ed), Neuro-Linguistic Programming In Alcoholism
Treatment, The Haworth Press, New York, London, pp. 27 - 47.
* Jelem, H.; Schtz, P., 1995: Neuro-Linguistic Psychotherapy, Nlpt, In:
European
Association
For
Neuro-linguistic
Psychotherapy,
www.eanlp.org/
* Lankton, S., 1980: Practical Magic: A Translation Of Basic NeuroLinguistic Programming Into Clinical Psychotherapy, In: C., Sterman
(Ed),
1990:
Neuro-Linguistic
Programming
In
Alcoholism
Treatment, The Haworth Press, New York, London.

* Larimer, M.; Palmer, R.; Marlatt, G., 1999: Relapse Prevention;
An Over View Of Marlatts Cognitive Behavioral Model, Alcohol
Research, Health, Vol. 23 (2), pp. 151 - 160 www.niaa.nih.gov/
publications/ arh23-2/151:160, PJF.
* Masters, B.; Rawlins, M.; Rawlins, L.; Weidner, J., 1991: The NLP
Swish Pattern: An Innovative Visualizing Technique, Journal Of Mental
Health Counseling, Jun, Vol. 13 (1), pp. 79 - 90.
* Miler, G.; McNeill, D., 1975: Psycholinguistics, In : G., Lindzey
(Ed), Handbook Of Social Psychology, American Publishing, co.,
PvTltd, vol. 3(2), New Delhi, pp. 666- 794.
* OConner, J.; Seymour, J., 1990: Introducing Neuro-Linguistic
Programming, Harper Collins Publishers, London, England.
* Overdruf, J.; Silverthorn, J., 1995: Recovering Options: The
Transformation Of Addictive Processes In Anchorpoint, Part A: Vol. 9
(6), June, pp. 29 - 35.
* Prochaska, J.; Norcross, J.; Diclememnte, C., 1994: Changing For
Good, William Morrow, Co., New York.
* Robbins, S., 1994: Neuro-Linguistic Programming: A Definition,
www.nlp.org/whats.nlp.html.
* Sandhu, D., 1991: Application Of Neuro-Linguistic Programming
For Treatment And Relapse Prevention Of Addictive Behaviors,
Paper Presented At The Annual Convention Of The American
Association For Counseling And Development, Reno, NV, April.
* Sterman, C., 1990 A: Neuro Linguistic Programming As Acoceptual
Base For The Treatment Of Alcoholism, In: C., Sterman (Ed), NeuroLinguistic Programming In Alcoholism Treatment, The Haworth Press,
New York, London. pp. 11 - 25.
* Sterman, C., 1990 B: Neuro-Linguistic Programming Rapport Skills
And Alcoholism Treatment, In: C., Sterman, Neuro-Linguistic

* Sterman, C., 1990 C: A Specific Neuro-Linguistic Programming
Technique Effective In Treatment Of Alcoholism, In: C., Sterman,
Neuro-Linguistic Programming In Alcoholism Treatment, The
* Sterman, C., 1990 D: Are You The Product Of My Misunder

Standing? Or The Role Of Sorting Mechanisms And Basic Human
Programs In The Treatment Of Alcoholism, In: C., Sterman, (Ed):
Neuro-Linguistic Programming In Alcoholism Treatment, The
*
Sterman,
C.,
,1991:
Neuro-Linguistic
Programming
As
Psychotherapeutic Treatment In Working With Alcohol And Other Drug

Addicted Families, Journal Of Chemical Dependency. Treatment, Vol. 4
(1), pp. 73 - 83.
* Tierney, M., 1990: Neuro- Linguistics As A Treatment Modality For
Alcoholism And Substance Abuse, In: C., Sterman, (Ed):
Neurolinguistic Programming In Alcoholism Treatment, The
* Velten, E., 1986: Withdrawal From Heroin And Methadone With
Rational Emotive Therapy: Practice And Theory, British Journal of
Cognitive Psychotherapy, 4, 19 - 24.
* Walton, M., 2001: Diversity In Relapse Prevention Needs: Gender
And Race Comparison Among Substance Abuse Treatment Patients,
American
Journal
Of
Drug
And
Alcohol
Abuse,
May,
www.findarticles.com.
* Watzlawick, P.; Weakland, J.; Fisch, R., 1974: Change: Principles Of
Problem Formation And Problem Re Solution, www.Norton. New York
.
* Wilson, G., 1996: Abnormal Psycholog Integrating Perspectives,
Allyn And Bacon, London.
* Yeager, J., 1985: Thinking About Thinking With NLP, Meta
Publication, Cupertino, California.
()1

" "
( ) 1

.
* " : "
* " :

""
177

".
* " : "

* " : ".
* " :
* : ..... K "

".
* " :
* " :

11
" ... K
.
* " : "

* : "....
" ... AD
VC
* " : "
* : "..... !" K
* " :
"
* " : "
* " : "

* " : ...... "
* " :
"
* " : ....". AD "

"
* " : "
* : ..... AD ""
( )6 :
() :
:
* " : ...... "
* :
VR .
* " : "
* " : ".
* " : "
* : ..... ! ""
* " : "
* " : "
* " : "
* " : "
* " : "
* :! " "
* " : "
* " :"
* " : "
* " : 777
"
* " :
"
* ..... : " ".
* " : "
* " :
"
* " : " .
* " : ... "
* " : "
* " :
"
* " : "
* .... : AC VC "
"
* " : "
* : " .......
"
* " : . "
* " : ....
" .
* " : !

"
* :
"
".
* " : "
* " : ".
* " : "
* ......." :
".
* " :
"
* :! " ".
* " : "
* " :
".
* " : "
* " : ".
* " :
"
* " :
!"
* " :

"
* " : ".
* " : "
* " : ".
* :
"
* " : ".
* " :

".
() :
* " :

"
* : "
"
* " :
"
* : " .....
!"
* " : "
* " : !"
* " : ...... ".
* " :

".
* " : "
* ...." : ......
!"
* " : "
* " : ......"
* " :

"
* : ."..... !"
* " :

" "
* " :
! "
* " :
"
* " :"
* " : "
* " :"
* " : "
* " : "
* " :
".
* : "..
.......

".
* " :

"
* " :!"
* " : ...... "
* : " ...... !"
* " :
"
* : ........ AD ""
* " : !

".
()

:
* " :

!"
* " :" .... VR
.
* " : ".
* " : "
* " : ....."
* " :
".
* : .
* " :

".
* : " ".
* " : ....
"
* : " .....
".
* " :
".
()6

" "
( )1

.
* " : "
* " : 94

11

".

* " : " -
* " :
" . ... VR K
.
* " :

"
* : ..... VR "
".

* " : "

* " :
* " :
"
"
* " :
"

"

* " :
"

* " :...... "

* " : "

* " : "
* " : "

* : ..... AD "

"
* " :

"
* ...: AD "
".
( )6
:
()
:
* " : ......
"
* .... : VR "! "
* " : "
* " :
".
* " :

"
* " : "
* " : "
* " : "
* " : "
* : .... VR " "

* " : "
* :" ..... "
* " : "
* " :
"
* " :"
* " :" .......
".
* " : "
* " : ".
* " : "
* " : "
* " : " .
* " : "
* " : "
* : ....... VC "
"
* " :
"
* :" ..... ......
"
* " : "
* " : ......
"
* " : "
* ...... : AC VC "...
" .
* " : "
"
* : .... ! "
".
* " : "
* " : ... ..
".
* " : "
* " : ....
".
* " :

"
* : " .....
".
* " : "
* " : ".
* " : "
* " : "
* " :
"
* : ..... AD "
"
* " : "
* " : ".
* " : "
* " : ".
* " :
"
* : ... VC " ".

* " :
".
* " : ".
* " :
"
* " :
".

* " :

".
() :
* " :

"
* " : "
* " :
"
* : " "
* " :
"
* " : "
* " :

".
* " :".
* " :
"
* " :
"
* " :

"
* " :
"
* " :

"
* " :
!"
* " :
"
* " : ......!"
* " :
"
* : .... AD " !"

* " :

* : " ..........
"
!"
* " : "
* : ... AD "
"
* " :".
* " :".
* " :
* " :
"
"
* " : "
* " : .....
"....
* " :

"
"
* : ........ AD "
!"
* " : ...... ".
* :" ......... !"

* " :
"
* :...... AD " .... "

* :

".
()

:
* " :
"
* " : "
* " :

......
.....
.".......
* : ""
* " : "
* " : ".
* " :
"
* " : 1 17
".
* : " ".
* " :

"
()1

" "
( )1

:
* " : "
* " :
" .
* " : "

* " :...

".
* " : "

* " : ".
* " :
"

* : .... AD "

* " : "
-
* " :
* " :
"
"
* : ...... AD "

! ...
"
"
* " :
" -
* " : ...

".
* " :
"
* : ..... AD " "
* " :
"
* .......: VR VC
"
".
( )6
:
()
:
* " : ......
"
* .....: VR "
"
* " : ..... "
* " : ".
* " : "
* " : "
* " :
"
* : ... VC "
"
* " : "
* : ...... AD " ....
"
* " : "
* " : .. ".
* " : "
* .....: VC " ".
* " :
"
* ......: VC " "
* " : " .
* : ... VC " ".
* " : "
* : ....... VC "

"
* " :
"
* " :
"
* " : "
* : .... AR VR ""
* " : "
* : ....... AC VC
" " .
* " : "
* " : ".
* " : "
* " : .....
".
* " : "
* :" .... .. ".
* " :
"
* " : ..
".
* " :

"
* : ..... VR
K AD "

".
* " : "
* " :.... "

* " :
"
* ....: VC AD "
"
* " :
"
* .... : VC "

".
* " :

"
* : ... "
".
* " :

!"
() :
* " :

"
* " :
.... "
* " :
"
* " :"
* " : "
* " :
"
* " :
".
* " :
".
* " :....
"
* " :
".
* " : .....
"
* : .... AD "

"
* " :

"
* : ...... AD " ....."

* " :
"
* : ...... AD " "
* " :

"
* : ...... VR "
"
* " : "
* : " ..........

"
* " :

"
"
"
* " : ...... AD "!"
* " : .....
".
* : ..... AD "".
* " : !"
* " : !"
* " :
"
* :....... AD " .... "
* " :
"
()

:
* " :

" .
* : ..... "
"
* " :

".
* : ...... !
"!"
* " :
"
* " :!" ..... VR

" ... !".
* " :
"
* " :!" ... VR
"
".
* " :

".
()1

" "
( )1

:
* " : "
* " : ".
* " :.... ".
* " :

"
* " : "

* " : "

".
* " : "
* " : ......
".
* " : "
-
* " : "
* " : "
* " :... .......
"
* " : "
-
* : ..... AD "

"
* " :
"
-
* " :
"
* " :
"
-
* : ..... AD "
.....
1 "
* " :

"

* : ..... AD AC
"
".
* " :

".
* ... : AD " ....".
( )6
:
()
:
* " :
"
* ... : VR AR " !
"
* " :..... ..... "
* " : ".
* " : "
* ... : VR " .....
"
* " :
"
* :" ..... ..... "
* " : "
* ..... : K " ..... "
* " :
"
* " : "
* " : "
* ... : VC "
"
* " :
"
* : " ...... ".
* " : "
* " :.... ".
* " : "
* " : .... "
* " :
" .
* : ... AC "....
".
* " :
"
* ":...... ".
* " :
"
* :

" ......
".
* " :

"
* " :
"
* " :"
* : "
".
* " : "
* " : ".
* " : ..... "
* ... : VC " ".
* " :
"
* : ! " .....
".
* " :
"
* : " .....
".
* " :
"
* ... : VR " ".
* " :"
* :"....... "
* " :
"
* : ...... "......
"
* " :

".
() :
* " :

"
* " :
"
* " :
"
* : " ......
"
* " :
"
* :....... AD " ....!"
* " : ".
* " : !".
* " :

"
* ........ : AD " "
* " :

"
* :"........ !"
* " :

".
* : ... "

"
* " : "
* " ...... :

"
* " :! ......

"
* : ...... AD "!"
* " : !"
* : " .......... ! !"
* " :
"
* ...... : AD "....... !"
* " :

".
()

:
* " :

" .......
.
* : ...... .
* " : ".
* :
* " :
"
* : .... .
* " :
".
* : .... " .....
"
* " : ".
* : ..... ! "

"
* " :

".
()5

" "
( )1

:
* " : "
* " : 14

11

".

* " : "

* : ........ K "

"

* " : "

* : ...... AD "

11
"
* " :
"
* " : ......
!".

* " :"
* " :

"
* " : ! ! "
-
* " : .....
"
* " :
"

* : .... AD " ....

"
* " :

"
* .... : AD " !"
( )6
:
()
:
* " :

"
* ... : VR "
"
* " : "
* " : !".
* " : "
* " : "
* " :
"
* .... : VC K
" ".
* " :
"
* ... : "
".
* " : "
* ...: VC " ...
"
* " :
"
* : .... VC "
"
* " : "
* : " ...... .... !".
* " : "
* " :....
".
* " : "
* : !" ......
"
* " : " .
* " :
".
* " :
"
* : !" ......
".
* " :

"
* " : ".
* " : ..... "

* : " ...

"
* " : ".
* .... : VC " "
* " : "
* : ! " .... !"
* " :
"
* : !" .........

!".
* " :

"
* : ...... VC K
"...
!".
* " :
"
* .... : "
".
* " :
"
* ... : "
!".
* " :

"
() :
* " :

! ... ".
* " : !"
* " :

"
* : ... " "
* " :
"
* " ....... : !"
* " :! ".
* :" .....

.
* " :
"
* :".......!"
* " : !"
* " : !"
* " :

"
* " :
"
* " :
"
* " : ...... !"
* " :

"
* " :
!"
* " :.......

!"
* : ... "

.......

!"
* " :

"
* " :
!"
* " :
".
* .... : " ".
* :
".
* .... : AD " ......!"
* " : "
* : ....... AD "".......
* " :

".
()

:
* " :

" .
* .... :
"!"
* " :
".
* ... :
"!"
* " : 1 17
"
* : " ....

".
* " : ......
".
* .... : "
"
* " :

".
()2

" "
( )1

:
* " : "
* " :

".

* " : "
* : ........ K "
"
* " : "

* ... : " AD

"
* " : "

* ... : K AD "

".
* " :
"

* ... : " AD

"
* " :

"
* : " "
* " : "

* .... : AD "
"
* " :

"
* .... : K AD " !"
( )6
:
()
:
* " :
"
* .... : VR " !"
* " : "
* "......... : !".
* " : "
* ..... : VR " "
* " :
"
* .... : VC K
" "
* " : "
* .... : " ".
* " :
"
* ... : "
".
* " : "
* : "..... "
* " : "
* " :
".
* " : "
* " :
".
* " : "
* .... : K " ...... "
* " :
" .
* : ! " ......
!".
* " :

"
* : ..... ! "
".
* " : "
* " : ".
* " : "
* " : ......... K "

* " :
".
* :! "
"
* " : .... "

* : ..... "
"
* " :
"
* ..... : VC "
".
* " : "
* : ...... "

".
* " :
"
* " ..... : ".
* " :

"
() :
* " :

".
" :
"
* " :

"
* ... : ! "
!"
* " :

"
* " :
! !"
* " : ......
".
* : " .....
" .
* " :
"
* " :"
* " : !"
* "........ : "
* " :

"
* : ...... AD "!"
* " : ..... "
* :" ....... "
* " :

"
* " :

"
* " :.......

"
* : .... AD " .....!"
* " : "
* " : !"
* " :
".
* .... : AD " ..... ...... ".

* " :

".
()

:
* " :

"
.
* .... :
* " : ".
* : "
".
* " :

"
* : ....... !.
* " :
".
* : ..... "
".
* " :
".
* " : "
".
* " :

".
()2

-1 ( )
:
-1
-3 () .

, ...
-

, , ,
...
..

, -
6-1
1-1
60-10

60
-6
2. Drug & Alcohol History
First
drug
abused:
Age of onset:......................................:
Motivations at onset:..........................................:
...............................................................................................
Drugs used in the ...............................:
...............................................................................................past:
Drug of choice at present:.........................................
Dose:...................:
Duration:.......:
Date of last dose:..........:
Duration .......:
Present motivations towards
abuse:
Pleasure
Apathy
Work conditions
Sense of comfort
Boredom
Isolation
Self medication
Peer influence
Family troubles
:
Other:
Negative
consequences
: )
a) psychological :
Suicide
Memory loss
Suspiciousness
Anxiety
Hallucination
Depression
Behavioral changes
Sedation
Flat affect
Psychiatric hospitalization
Others:...............................................................................:
: )
b) Feelings associated with drugs use :
Guilt
Anger
Exciement
Low self esteem
Sadness for no reason
felling
&
Shame
nervousness
: )
c) Medical consequence :
Overdose
Severe withdrawal
Loss of consciousness

Seizures
AIDS
Loss of appetite
Liver cirrhosis
Psycho sezual
Tremor
Impiaed liver functions
Viral hepatitis
disorders
Chest infections
Peptic ulcer
.................Others................................................................................
..............................................................................
d)
Family
relationships
Divorce
Separation
Family quarrels
Family reputation
Others................................................................................
e)
Interpersonal
relationships
Violent behavior

Isolation
Absence from
Loss of friends
work
Suspiciousness
Fights with work colleagues & superiors
..................Others....................................................................................
.................................................................................
f)
Behavior
changes
:)
after
addiction
Shame
Forgetfulness
Fears
Lying
Aggressiveness
Hesitation
Perplexity
..................Others....................................................................................
.................................................................................
g)
Financial
Loss of property
Can not provide for himself or family
Debts
..................Others....................................................................................
.................................................................................
h)
Legal
Arrest
Imprisonment
Homicide
Accidents
Drug dealing
Legal judgment
Theft
................................................................................................................
......................................................................................
Effect of legal problems on

relapse
.......................................................................................................................................
.......................................................
Past treatment from addiction

Yes

In-
No
Out- patient

patient
Type of program ...............................................................

Date.......................... Hospital ..............................
Longest duration ....... Number of times.......... :
Response to treatment......................................................
After care program...........................................................
Previous
attempts
to
abstain
Yes
No
Longest period........... Number of times ............ :

Reasons
for
.......................................................
.................................................................................................abstinence
..
of
Present
stage
dependency
-1
Prodromal
-1
Crucial
-3
Chronic
-1
Recovery
Patients
insight

Got insight
Partial insight
NO
insight
.................Explain....................................................................................
..........................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................
........................................................
-1
3- SOCIAL CONDITION

Economical
level
Present job..........................................................................
......................................................................................
...................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................
.........................................................
Reasons of job
......................................................................................................loss

income
of
Source
Private
Family
Work
Friends
Drug dealing
............................................................. None business

..................................................... Others
Monthly cost of alcohol/ ....... / income
Monthly
narcotics
Housing

With
With family
Living alone
Others...................................................................................... friends

Dose he think that his neighborhood may affect his relapse?
Yes
Has he a plan to change his place of

Yes
No
residence?
No
Explain ....................................................................................
Family
Family
history
of
.........................................
..................................................................................................dependence
....

Family
situation
Substance use among parents or siblings
Difficulty to express
Fights between brothers

Selfishness
Unequalty treated by parents

Jealousy
themselves
Death of a
Superficial relations
Parents
Parents divorce
parent
remarriage
Factors
of
family
cohesion

Psychological support
Understanding
Mutual respect
Financial support
Interest in cultural & sportive
Warm relations
activities
:
Marital
life
Number of wives .........................................................
Wife
....................................................... :
..........................................................................................personality
Males ...........
Disturbed
No.
of
children .......
.....
........................ Females.........
relations
with
..............................................................................................children
Separated
Living with his wife
Reasons of separation or ......................... Divorce

...............................................................................................divorce
Problems with present ............................
...............................................................................................wife
Attitude of the wife
towards his

dependency
Submission
Not understanding
Refusal
Understanding
Effect of addiction on family emotions

...............................................................................................

Effect of addiction on carrying family responsibilities
..........................................................................................................
....................................................................................
:
Effect of marital relation on patients relapse:
..................................................................................................................
-1 ..........................................................................................

4- Support Network
( )
Positive
network:
Name .......................... Tel: ............................... :
Address: ..........................................................................
( : )
Negative network
Type of relation: ...........................................................

( : )Effect: ......................................................... :
-5
5- Pattern Of Daily Life
:
activity:
Daily
Time of start ...............................................................

:
activities:
daily
of
Briefing
..................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................
Hobbies
Travel
Future alternative activities:
Work
Club
Self-help group
Prayer
after care program
..................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................
( )

No work
Pears effect
Traveling
Family troubles
income Academic failure

Relapsing reasons:
Homeless
No
Religious faith
Others:...............................................................................
...............................................................................................

?Can the family help him to solve these problem
Yes
Explain...............................................................................
No
Explain...............................................................................

?Did he try to solve these problems
No
Why? .................................................................................
...............................................................................................
Yes
How?..................................................................................
...............................................................................................
?Does he want to change his life style
No
Yes
What aspects he can ........

?..............................................................................................change
................................................................................................
-2
6- Prognosis
His insight ..................................................... :
...................................
Present
.............................................................................................problems
..........................................................................................................
......................................................................................
Family involvement ............................................
..................................
good
with
Factors
............................................................................................prognosis
..................................................................................................
Factors with bad prognosis ....................................
-8
7- Case Summary
..........................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................
.............................
..........................................................................................................
....................................................................................
ASSESSED BY
...........
Date.........
()6
100

. , . , .

-125

( )
: ---
: --------------
: ----------------------------
------------------------

( )

17
11
11
13
11
11
14
12
15
19
17
11
11
13
11
11
14
12
18
19
37
31
31
33
31
31
34
32
38
39
17
11
11

13
11
11
14
12
18
19
17
11
11
13
11
11
14
12
18
19
47
41
41
43
41
41
44
42
48
49
27
21
21
23
21
21
24
22
28
29
87
81
81
83
81
81
84
55
88
89
97
91
91
93
91
91
94
92
98
99
177
100
. , . , .
:
10
11
16
11
11
15
12
18
16
11
60
61
66
61
61
65
62
68
66
61
10
11
16
11
11
15
12
18
16
11
10
11
16
11
11
15
12
18
16
11
50
51
56
51
51
55
52
58
56
51
20
21
26
21
21
25
22
28
26
21
80
81
86
81
81
85
82
88
86
81
60
60
66
61
61
65
62
68
66
61
10
11
16
11
11
15
12
18
16
11
100

:

%11

.

.

.
: :
:
( )1 :

.
( )6 :

.
( )1 :

.
: :

37 : 18 11.12.
: :
:
-1 .
-1 .177
-3
:
- :
.
- :
.
- : .
- : .
: :
-1

.
-1

.
-3

.
ABSTRACT
Aim of the Study:
The present study investigate the extent of effectiveness of neurolinguistic programming in the relapse prevention through reaching to
the structure of the subjective experiences to substances abusers, that
related to their conscious and unconscious processes, and reframing
these experiences to maintain abstinence as a desired outcome, or the
relapse prevention as long time as possible.
Sample of the Study:
Six cases of substances abusers with mean age 24.17 years old.
Tools of the Study:
1- File of psychological examination for addicted patients.
2- Questionnaire of the relapse situations 100.
3- The strategies of reframing through the model of neurolinguistic programming that involved four stages of application:
1- The first stage: meta model, pacing and identify the
primary representational systems.
2- The second stage: sub- submodalities, six-step reframe and
anchoring.
3- The third stage: Desired outcome: behavioral change.
4- The fourth stage: Reassessment for further work in the first
and second stages: feed back therapist through six months after
follow-up.
The result of the study

The result of the study indicate these points:
1- The structure of subjective experiences to these cases involves
perspectives and positive original intents, that are identified by
the primary internal representational systems and their maps of
reality, that differ from the actual reality in one or more than the
processes of human modeling: generalization, or distortion, or
deletion.
2- Neuro-linguistic programming helps these cases to reframe
their subjective experiences about substances abuse by sub
modalities which belong to these experiences, and integration of
internal conflict parts that generates the behavior who want to
be sober, and who want to be addict by separating the positive
original intention from actually manifested behavior of
substances abuse, and assist them in retrieving their internal
sources and skills to create a number of behavioral choices and
alternatives to respond to the positive original intent without
going to substances abuse, in addition to anchoring desired
outcome response through use of a sensory mode visual,
auditory, or kinesthetic that related to representational systems
instead of triggers which connected to substances abuse to call
it when needed.
3- Relapse due to the lack of internal sources and skills of these cases to
create a number of behavioral choices and alternatives to response to the
positive original intent of substances abuse without going to it, where the
defect in ecological state of those cases, they arent committed to do these
alternatives with extreme addiction, and its history in the absence of family
role to this ecological state lead to retroactive modern frames front of old
frames, which still effective in unconscious, then relapse occurs, hence the
effectiveness of neuro-linguistic programming in the relapse prevention
identified by examining the subsequent ecological state substances abusers
and reframing another time.
Zagazig University
Faculty of Arts
Psychology Department
The Extent Of Effectiveness Of NeuroLinguistic Programming In The Relapse

Prevention Among A Sample Of
Substances Abusers
Thesis
Submitted For Fulfilment of the Requirement for
M.A. in Psychology
Prepared By
Doaa Salah El-din Mohammed Shams Elhariry

Supervised by
Prof. Dr.
Abd Allah El-Sayed Askar

Chairman of Department of Psychology
Faculty of Arts
Zagazig University
2006

مدى فعالية البرمجة اللغوية العصبية في منع الانتكاسة لدى عينة من متعاطي المواد المؤثرة نفسي....

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

مدى فعالية البرمجة اللغوية العصبية في منع الانتكاسة لدى عينة من متعاطي المواد المؤثرة نفسي....

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

-

: 161 - 101 .......................................

: 126 - 161 ...................................

: 651 - 121 ........................................

650 181 .....................................................

651 - 651 ...................................

The Identification Of The Self With The Addictive

)(Gray, 1997: 2-3

Neuro Linguistic Programming

)(Andreas, Andreas, 1987: 96

1110 Sterman, 1990 A

)(Sterman, 1990 A: 11-25

)(Isaacson, 1990: 27-49

(Doorn, 1990: 79-

)(Henman, Henman, 1990: 105- 124

1110 Sterman, C., 1990 D

)(Sterman, 1990 D: 125-140

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 849

)(Wilson, et al., 1996: 276-275

)(Beck, et al., 1993: 292

( )112 -115 :6005

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 849 - 850

Bandler, Grinder, 1979 "

)(Bandler, Grinder, 1979: 77

Alfrd Korzybsky Bateson

)(Dilts, Delosier, 2000: 460 - 850

( )11 -16 :6001

( )12 -15 :6001

)(Jelem, Schtz, 1995: 2

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 165

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 577

)(Jelem, Schtz, 1995: 2

( )50 -11 :6001

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 452

Tierney, 1990 1110

)(Tierney, 1990: 145

( )61 -60 :6001

)(Beahrs, 1982 116

)661 -661 :6001

( )111 161 :6001

Miller, 1956 1152

( )152 -156 :6001

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 852

( )660 -611 :6001

( )628 -622 :6001

Bandler, Grinder, 1979 1181

)(Bandler, Grinder, 1979: 5

)(Sterman, 1990 A: 17-18

( )11 -11 :6001

Eye Movement patterns

( )661 -661 :6001

)(Bandler, Grinder, 1975: 177

( )118 -166 :6001

)(Bandler, Grinder, 1982: 180

)(Baab, 1992: 198

)112-161 118 :6001

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 910

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 909-910

)(Sterman, 1990 B: 57-58

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 910

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 29

)(Dilts, Delozier, 2000: 29

Henman, Henman, 1990