_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

- 2012 / 11

:

.
: .

:
.
.
:
:


:
-1

. )(
.
-1-1 :
.
:
:
) (
) ( .


.
- 2-1 : :
-1 .
-2 .1
-3 .

193

_______________________________________________________________________

-4
.
-5
.2
-2

.
.
"

.

".
- 1-2 :
.
1971
) (


.3
) (
: 4
" "
) (
) (

)(
" " "
" .5
-2-2
.
.

.6
.
.7
-3
- 1-3 :
cest la comptence qui fait la diffrence

8
.

194

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

- 2012 / 11

:
. - 2-3 :


.
- 1-2-3 9001 : 2008 9001

.9 ISO 9001 2008
2008/11/15 .9001
ISO 9001 2008 2:6
:
-6 : :
-1.6 .
-2.6 .
-1.2.6 :
.
.
-2.2.6 : :
. . . .
. -3.6 .10
- 2-2-3 :10011


11
:
-3-2-3 :17024
) (EN45013 1989
) (CEN ) (ISO ISO 17024
.EN45013
195

_______________________________________________________________________

.12
- 4-2-3 :OHSAS 18001

OHSAS 18001
:
.13 -4
- 1-4 :
. 14

.15
) (10015 2001
) (CSEND 19 .2003
- 2-4 :

.


16
:
.- 3-4 :
17
:
:
.
:
.
:
.
:
.

196

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

- 2012 / 11

:
.

.
1960 KARU
ISHIKAWA .
18
1962 .

.
-5 9000


.


2005 173
9000 :
% 56.7 . % 65 % 35. % 99 9001 .2000 % 61 % 20 % 16 03 % .
19
:
: .
: .

.
: . ) (
.


20
.
-6
- 1-6 :
%71
.
.


... .
197

_______________________________________________________________________

.
- 2-6 :


.

.
1-2-6 : ) (63
)
( Cronbach Alpha
) ( ) (%93
).(%60
- 2-2-6 :

) (SPSS 15 :

) (
) (One Way ANOVA Stepwise -1-2-2-6 :
) (3.63 ) (0.71 ) 12
( ) (4.06 ) (1.001 15
) (
) (3.23 ) (1.39

.

.
-2-2-2-6 :


) (%56.1

) ( ) (%65.9 .


) (%53.6 ).(%20.1
:
Entry 0.05
)
( ) (
) ) .((1

198

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

- 2012 / 11

) (%56.1 ) (%31.5
) (%31.5 )(%68.5
.
-3-2-2-6 :

) (VIF ) (Tolerance
) (VIF ) (10

) (0.05
.
) (2
) (VIF 10 )1.266
(2.983 ) (0.05
.
) 0.335 (0.79
)(Skewness
) (3 ) (01

) (1.003
.
-4-2-2-6 : ) (4
" " . ) (4 :
30.622 66.627 97.250
8 181 3.828 0.368 10.399 0.000 0.005 ) (1 .
8

: Y = ai * xi ) (5
i =1

. 1.639
Sig )
(
) (0.131 0.575 0.677 0.104 0.437 0.127 H0
0.05 ) (0.002 0.000 0.000
y=1.639 + 0.271x1 +0.65x4
H1 :

.
-5-2-2-6 :

.
) (6

.

199

_______________________________________________________________________

) ( )
( ) (%53.6 . ) (%28.7
) (%71.3
.

) (%48.4 .
) (6 Stepwise :
27.903 69.346 97.250
2 187 13.952 0.371 37.622 0.000 0.005 .
) (7 .Stepwise
a
:
y=1.83 + 0.281x1 + 0.287x2
Y=a cx1 + bx2 :
Sig 0.005 H1
.


.
:


. :





.

.
.

200

2012 / 11 -

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

: (1)
Model Summary
Model
1

R
,561a

R Square
,315

Adjusted
R Square
,285

Std. Error of
the Estimate
,60672

a. Predictors: (Constant), ME, MTIC, MK, MF, MM, MCOM,

MR, MMK

: (2)
Coefficientsa

Model
1

(Constant)
MF
MM
MCOM
MK
MTIC
MR
MMK
ME

Unstandardized
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
1,639
,271
,271
,051
,076
,049
-,047
,061
,265
,086
,095
,058
,032
,076
,050
,089
-,124
,081

Standardized
Coefficients
Beta
,387
,116
-,066
,225
,113
,038
,060
-,157

t
6,054
5,291
1,531
-,779
3,094
1,633
,417
,562
-1,519

Sig.
,000
,000
,127
,437
,002
,104
,677
,575
,131

Collinearity Statistics
Tolerance
VIF
,708
,663
,524
,716
,790
,449
,335
,353

1,412
1,507
1,910
1,396
1,266
2,228
2,983
2,833

a. Dependent Variable: MPQ

: (3)

: (1)

: (4)
b
ANOVA

Sum of
Mode
Squares df ean Squa F
1
Regress30,622
8
3,828 10,399
Residua66,627
181
,368
Total 97,250
189

Sig.
,000a

a.Predictors: (Constant), ME, MTIC, MK, MF, MM,

b.Dependent Variable: MPQ

201

_______________________________________________________________________

: (5)
a
Coefficients

Model
1
(Constant)
MF
MM
MCOM
MK
MTIC
MR
MMK
ME

Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
Beta
1,639
,271
,271
,051
,387
,076
,049
,116
-,047
,061
-,066
,265
,086
,225
,095
,058
,113
,032
,076
,038
,050
,089
,060
-,124
,081
-,157

t
6,054
5,291
1,531
-,779
3,094
1,633
,417
,562
-1,519

Collinearity Statistics
Sig.
Tolerance
VIF
,000
,000
,708
1,412
,127
,663
1,507
,437
,524
1,910
,002
,716
1,396
,104
,790
1,266
,677
,449
2,228
,575
,335
2,983
,131
,353
2,833

a. Dependent Variable: MPQ

: (6)

Stepwise : (7)

Stepwise : (8)
Coefficientsa

Model
1
2

(Constant)
MF
(Constant)
MF
MK

Unstandardized
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
2,601
,144
,339
,045
1,830
,250
,281
,046
,287
,077

Standardized
Coefficients
Beta
,484
,402
,244

a. Dependent Variable: MPQ

202

t
18,046
7,584
7,312
6,129
3,716

Sig.
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000

Collinearity Statistics
Tolerance
VIF
1,000

1,000

,887
,887

1,128
1,128

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

- 2012 / 11

:
-1 1998 .63
-2 1999 .144
- 3 :
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=ArticleA_C&cid=1176631672092&pagename=Zone-ArabicNamah%2FNMALayout on line , consult le 19/07/2006.
- 4 .02
- 5 .03
- 6 :
2005 :
Zeroual Mohamed, La gestion prventive des comptences , Ides et Dbats , Quotidien El-Watan, 20 Novembre
2003.p11.
- 7 .
- 8
03 2004.242
-9 9000 .22
- 10 9001 2008 2009 .88
-11 2002 .155
-12
: 2004/2003 .63
-13
2005 .03
-14
2001-2000 .31
-15 2009 .220
- 16 2001 .120
- 17 .51
- 18 1996 . 109
-19 10-9
2004 .183 :
ISO 9000 : Version 2000, Systme de management de la qualit, Exigences , Chap 06 p 13.14.
-20 .184

203