................: ....

.: ........
: .........
................. : ............................
................... :.................................
. ..
)..........(0770 53 79 34
...........049 96 84 43.. ....... :
:

tikkaoui2006@yahoo.com

. tikkaoui@maktoob.com

. :
- - .
..... : .........................................
...DATA SHOW:
:

 -
- .
:

) (20
) (SPSS
:

-1 - -

.

-2 -
) (.

.
: .
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the role of incubator organizations
depends heavily on small and medium enterprises in building the
competitiveness from the viewpoint of the respondents and to achieve
the objectives of the study was used to identify the purpose of collecting
data from members of the study sample, amounting to (20) Single, have
been using the Statistical Package for Science Social (SPSS) to analyze
the data resolution, depending on the averages, etc. The study found a
set of results, notably:
1 - that the overall average of business incubators institutions - Business
Park - Small and medium was high, and perceptions of the study sample
examined, the dimensions of competitiveness was also high.
2 - that there is a positive role in incubator institutions - Business Parksmall and medium enterprises in building competitiveness (flexibility,
knowledge of work performance, quality).
2

The study recommends the need to adopt the study sample

examined, the new policy is working to expand the actual role of
business incubators by the state Directorate of the small and medium
enterprises to increase the ability of institutions to compete, and by
drawing closer to the young graduates of institutes and universities, and
the allocation of adequate support financially and technically, and
management, and to ensure that instill an organizational culture that
supports flexible Entrepreneurship policy of building competitiveness.
-1:

...

- -

 -2 :
-1 ):(Problem of Study

...

.1
.2

.3

.4

-2 ):(Importance of Study

:
: .
4

:
.

.
:
.
-3 ):(Objectives of Study

.1 - -.
.2 .

.3
.
.4
.

.5
.

-4 ):(Variables of Study
-1 : .
-2 : :
-1.

-2 .

-5):(Hypothesis of Study

-3.

:
) (0.05
.
:
-

) (0.05

.
5

 ) (0.05 .

) (0.05 .
-6 ):(Methodology of Study

) (SPSS .
-7 :
):(Stasistical Population of Study

.
):(Sample of Study

) (20 )

(
.
-8 ):(Tool of Study

) (29

) (
) (12
) (12
) (03 ) (03

) (06.

) (01:
) :(01 .
6

) (20

) (19 ) (%95 .

) (Cronbachs Alpha ) (%82.2

) (%68 ) (%5
.
-8 ):( The Time of Study

2003 .2010

-3 :
1-3 :
:1-1-3 :

.
: .
-1 :

 ) (09 2.2

-2 :

.
-3 :

"
" 1 09

10 49

50 249 " 2
250
50 .

-4 :

"
09 20
10 " 3 "

50 250 200 02
100 500 ".

.
::

:

. . -

. . .8

 : :

1985
.

:
-1 .
-2 .

-3 .
-4
.

.
:2-1-3 :
: :

...
.

:
9

 - "

".

"

".

"

".

. . . - .

: 78/03 2003
"
".

20 50

18 36
:
10

 ).(APSI- ) :(ANSEJ

: :

10

. . - .

11

. . . . - .

12

. - .

- .

. .
: :
:
- :) (NBEB. 2000 :

13

-1 : .
11

 -2 :
.

-3 : .
: : :

14

-1 :
... .
-2 : ...

... .
-3 :
.

: : :

15

: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :3-1-3 :
: :


:

) (PERCEROU, 1984 "

".

16

"

".

17

" ".
12

18

 "

".

19

:
.

.
.

.
: :

.
:

-1 :

.
-2:

.

20

-3 :

13

 -4:

.
"
"

21

" " 22

) (ASQC "

" 23

) (ISO "

".

24

-5:

:christopher lovelock "

".

25

) (eiglier et Langeard, 1999 "

".

26

"
".

27

"

".

28

.
-6:

29

14

( .

:4-1-3 - -
:


.

150

465 200
18 2

.

.
:
-

15

.
-2-3 :
-1
:(2006)

.

16

-2
):(2006

.
-3 :
):(2008

.
-4 :
-1-4 .
-1 :
) :(02 .

12

07

19

%63.2

%36.8

%100

) (02 ) (%63

) (%37
17

 ) (05 ) (%26

.
-2 :
) :(03 .

30
07

30 40
09

40 50
03

19

%36.8

%47.4

%15.8

%100

) (03 30
40 ) (%47
30 ) (%37
) 40 ( %16 .
-3 :
) :(04 .

03

07

09

19

%15.8

%36.8

%47.4

%100

) (04
)( ) (%47

)(%37) (%16
.

-4 :
) :(05 .
5

5 7

7 10

10

10

19

%52.6

%5.3

%10.5

%31.6

%100

18

 ) (05 5

) (%53
10 ) (%32
5 10
)(%5.3) (%10.5 .
-5 :
) :(06 .

04

13

19

%10.5

%21.1

%68.4

%100

) (06 ) (%68

) (%21
%10
.

-2-4 .
-1-2-4 :
:

) :(07 .

19

01

02

03

04

05

06
07

- -
.
-
.

08

09

10

11

12

3.74

1.097

3.21

1.032

12

3.84

0.764

3.95

0.970

4.00

1.154

4.31

0.885

4.10

0.737

3.68

1.376

10

3.84

0.602

3.63

0.830

11

3.84

0.501

4.53

0.611

3.89

0.29

) (07
) (3.00

) (12 ) (4.53 ) (0.611

) (05) (07) (06 ) (4.00) (4.10)(4.31

) (1.15) (0.737) (0.885

.
) (04

) (3.94 ) (0.970

20

 )(11)(09)(03

) (3.84 (0.602)(0.764)
) (0.501 - -

) (10)(08)(01
) (3.63) (3.68) (3.74 )(1.097

) (0.830) (1.370


.
) (02 ) (3.21 ) (1.032

.

)(3.89

) (0.29

21

 -2-2-4 :
:
) :(08 .

3.86

0.68

3.79

1.084

4.00

0.816

3.79

0.787

: :

3.12

0.620

2.95

0.911

11

2.53

1.073

12

3.89

0.936

3.81

0.426

3.89

1.17

08

3.84

0.764

09

3.31

0.945

10

10

3.79

0.713

11

3.89

0.936

12

4.16

0.958

3.65

0.366

::
01

02

03

04

05

06

.
::

07

) (08

) (12 ) (4.16 )(0.958

) (02
) (4.00 ) (0.816
.

22

 ) (11)(07)(06 ) (3.89
(0.936) (1.17)(0.936)


) (08 ) (3.84 )(0.734

.
) (10)(03)(01

) (3.79 )(0.787) (1.084

)(0.713

) (09 ) (3.31
) (0.945
.
) (05) (04

) (2.53) (2.95 ) (1.073)(0.911

.

)(3.65
) (0.366
.

:

23

) :(09 .

01

02

03

3.86

0.68

3.12
3.81

0.620
0.426

3.65

0.366

) (09 ) (3.86
) (0.68 ) (3.81

) (0.426 ) (3.12
) (0.620
.

) (3.65 ) (0.366
.

:
) :(10 .

01
02

3.89

0.294

3.65

0.366

) (10 - -
) (3.89 ) (0.294
) (3.65 ) (0.366

.
-3-4 .

- -

24

) (Sig ) (0.05

:
) (0.05
.
-1-3-4 :
: ) (0.05
.

) (SPSS
:
) :(11 " "
""

sig

1.744

0.544

0.056

0.236

0.331

)(
- ) (0.544

) (%54
-
) (%5 ) (1.744

R ) (0.056
%6 -
) (%24

25

) (0.05 (
:
) ) (0.05
(.
-2-3-4 :
: ) (0.05
.

) (SPSS

) :(12 " "

" "

-3.002

1.574

R
0.556

sig

0.746

0.000

)(
)( -
) (1.574 ) (%157

- -
- ) (%5 ) (-3.002
.
R ) (0.556
%56 -
)(%75

26

) (0.05
( :
) )(0.05
(.

-3-3-4 :
: ) (0.05
.

) (SPSS

) :(13 " "

""

1.338

0.637

R
0.193

R
0.439

sig
0.060

)(
- ) (0.637
) (%64

-
) (%5 ) (1.338
.
R ) (0.193

) (%19 -
) (%44
.
)

) (0.05 (
:
27

) ) (0.05

(.

:
) :(14 " "
" .

0.354

0.848

R R
0.46

0.68

sig
0.010

)(
)( -
) (0.848 ) (%85
-
) (%5 ) (0.354
.
R ) (0.46
) (%46 -
)(%68

.
)

) (0.05
( :
) ) (0.05

(
28

 -4:
:

-1


.
-2

.
-3

) (%68

.
-4
) (0.05
)(%85
.

-5:
:
-1

.
-2
.
-3

29

 -4

.
-6 :
1 .2002 15
2

"

2001 .8

: " 22-18.2004
4

.9

5 .2001

.27
6

2004.54

7 "

" .2002/10/9-8.11
8

78-03 26 2003 14 .14

2003 .23-22

10

18-17 2006 .612

11

18-17 2006 .1018

12 78-03 25 2003 .14

National Business, Incubator Association (NBIA), membre presse releases, 7/10/2000, pp 1-2
14

13

2006 .613

15

17

R., Percer, Entreprise: Gestion et comptitivit. et Econmic, 1984, p. 53

2004 .43

16

:2007 .5
18 :

.2002 .11

19 2002 : .11

20 :
10 :2008 01.105

21 2003 .296
22 : 2000 .25
23 .2002 .14

24 :

.2006 .82

30

25

Michel Lenglois et Gerard Tocguer, Marketing des service, Lede effractionnaire, gaetan, Marin diteur,
parius 1992. P23.
26

Eiglier pierre et Eric Langeard, servuction, Le Merket ing des servies, 7 eme tirage, ed science
internationale,1999. P 8
27
( - )
.475 2002

. 227 .2003 ( 4) 28
Best RJ, Maret- based management: strategies for Growing Customer Value and profitability, prenticehall, Inc, U.S.A. 1997. P 14
29

31