UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MOTION OBJECTION v. AND NOTICE DANIEL RILEY, Et al, 1:07-c1-189-GZS COMES NOW, making a special appearance, Daniel Riley, acting in a sovereign capacity, Sui Juris, not Pro Se repeat not Pro Se representing the fiction DANIEL RILEY, and files this motion. Inno way can this notice be construed to grant jurisdiction over the defendant, because the defendant’s counsel still contends no jurisdiction exist. In ‘no way should this notice be construed to be considered a contract, and all rights are reserved at the common law UCC 1-308 and 1-103.6 without prejudice. 1. The defendant makes this motion in accordance to F.R.Cr.P. 12(b)(2). 2. Daniel Riley is representing the defendant which the UNITED STATES Federal Corporation's sub-corporation, known as DANIEL RILEY, which is a fiction and ‘was attached to Daniel Riley (living soul) via his registration at birth (by his unsuspecting parents) and by the issuance of a social security account (which Daniel Riley (the sovereign) never applied for), 3. Since Daniel Riley is being held responsible for this sub-corporation, DANIEL RILBY, Daniel Riley decided to represent himself Sul Juris in his sovereign capacity and exercise his Sixth Amendment Right to do so. 4, The United States through their court has assigned a stand by counsel 1o Daniel Riley, against his wishes. The stand by counsel, Mr. Wiberg, is there just in case Daniel Riley changes his mind and wants representation to be provided by the court, is ‘what Deniel Riley has been told by the court. 5. Mr, Wiberg in no way represents the sub corporation DANIEL RILEY and is supposed to be no part of this ease exeept as a partisan member of the audience. 6. __ Daniel Riley OBJECTS to the UNITED STATES making contact and discussing this case ex-parte (without Danie! Riley being present) with Mr. Wiberg and sending him correspondances (not discovery) in regards to this case. The UNITED STATES is and has been treating Mr. Wiberg as if he was counsel for DANIEL RILEY, wich is violating Daniel Riley's Sixth Amendment Right to self representation.7. Thishas been ongoing for some time. Mr. Wiber being a member of the B.AR. Association makes him a quasi member of the court, therefore a member of the government. 8. The defendant through his counsel Danie! Riley, gives notice to this court that his Sixth Amendment Right to self representation is being and has been violated. 9, The defendant wants the court to order the plaintiff to talk directly to the defendant if it has any issues concerning this case and to leave Mr. Wiberg out of it. The defendant can think and make decisions on his own behalf and give assentions as needed. 10. The defendant is be prejudiced by having Mr Wiberg as standby counsel For example today the defendant received discovery material sent to him via the U.S. mail. The jail said the defendant can not have these discs because I am represented by a lawyer and the lawyer did not give them to the defendant. I explained to the jail ( Lt. ‘Wisegaurber) that I am representing myself and the jail disagreed and confiscated the discs. This has been going on for months. I explained this to the court in early January and a lady named Brenda called the jail and she said she had straightoned it out and that jail will be giving the defendant all discs sent in by my supporters. This never occurred so the defendant is deprived his right to represent himself and being prejudiced by having a stand by counsel (a counsel that the defendant never requested). The defendant is being deprived the ability to defend himself, represent himself and is being denied exculpatory discovery. 11. _ The defendant does NOT want Mr. Wiberg as stand by counsel. The defendant will no longer communicate with Mr. Wiberg or have anything to do with him. T have been deprived the right to represent myself for five months now and both counsels forced on the defendant by the government have prejudiced the defendant's case. Stop sending counselors to the defendant. 12. The defendant wants the court to stop writing on documents to other courts and agencies that the defendant has court appointed counsel and then puts stand by in parentheses. The defendant wants to make clear to this court that their is no court appointed counsel in this case. The defendant had to clarify this with the First Circuit Court of Appeal because this court erroneously told the First Circuit that court appointed counsel had been issued, which is not the case or is it. [fit isthe ease, then the defendant's Sixth Amendment Right to self representation has and continues to be denied by this court. 13. The defendant also wants to make clear to this court that in no way is he representing his sub corporation ina Pro Se capacity, but is doing so ina Sui Juris capacity. There is a big difference as the court should know. 14. _ This court refuses to answer the defendant's claims of no jurisdiction and deems them as "frivolous." The defendant knows the court is using the jurisdiction ofimplied ownership of the sub corporation DANIEL RILEY by the living soul Daniel Riley in the realm of commerce law, which is so unconstitutional and down right evil. 15. The sovereiga living soul Daniel Riley declares for this court, under the penalty of perjury, that he never knowingly, willingly, intentionally and with forethought created the sub corporation DANIEL RILEY. The sub corporation DANIEL RILEY was created by the UNITED STATES federal corporation (chartered in 1871 and is now bankrupt) and who attached it to the living soul Danie! Riley without his consent, knowledge, understanding or permission, therefore a void contract, therfore Daniel Riley severes all connections to the corporation DANIEL RILEY. WHEREFORE Daniel Riley requests the following relief form this court; A. Foran order to stop the UNITED STATES from contacting Mr. Wiberg with any regards to DANIEL RILEY, B. For the court to acknowledge Daniel Riley in a Sut Juris capacity, C. To dismiss the case because Daniel Riley is not reponsible for the sub corporation DANIEL RILEY, the defendant, D. To dismiss the case for the violations of the defendant's Sixth Amendment Rights, E. To dismiss this case because the court and the plaintiff have no jurisdiction over Daniel Riley, living soul, F. Let the defendant exercise his Sixth Amendment Right to self representation and tell Mr. Wiberg not to stand by. G. Any other relief the court deems proper and justified. DATED: February 20, 2008 Danicl Riley (st Indigent inmate scDC 266 County Farm Rd Dover NH, 03820 All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice juris) CC: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE AUSA Robert Kinsella David Bownes, Stanley Norkunas, Note: Bownes, Norkunas and served by Electronic filing as per their request.