Professional Documents
Culture Documents
/ Interview
YNENTEYH
I NTERVIEW
Professor Bj o
/ rn U. Zachrisson
.
,
.
2012;15:1-13.
. Bj o/ rn Zachrisson , 1970
,
. 250
, , , .
. Zachrisson
. ,
, , ,
Salzmann (1986), Steiner (1990), Friel (1997), Mershon (1998),
Northcroft (1999), Seward (2000), Merrifield (2000) Case (1996),
(Orthodontic Education and Research Foundation, OERF) (1995),
Associated Journals of Europe (1997), Burstone (1999), Kokich/Shapiro
Visiting Scholar (1999), 8th SIDO World (2001), Dewel (2003).
2007 Ketcham
Jarabak .
. Zachrisson
, (), . ,
, , , ,
,
Tweed, .
Journal of Clinical
Orthodontics .
. : . Zachrisson, ,
/ Interview
Professor Bj o/ rn U. Zachrisson
Dr.
, . , . ,
, ;
. Zachrisson: ,
. ,
. Edward
Angle
,
. , ,
,
. .
,
, Herbst
twin bite blocks.
(
/ Interview
/ Interview
/ Interview
1. - (A,F).
(A). (B). , (C-D). . (F).
Figure 1. Adult female patient with constricted smile and excessive gingiva-to-lip distance on the right side (A,F). Note lingual tilt of all
maxillary and mandibular teeth before treatment (A). Increased lingual root torque was provided in rectangular stainless steel archwires (B).
The maxillary archform was not expanded laterally, but merely rounded off (C-D). Electrosurgery was performed from right second premolar
to left lateral incisor. The very slight lingual crown torque for the canines and the upright premolars make the post-treatment smile appear
full and radiant with symmetric gingival exposure (F).
.
torque ,
.
torque
( 1-5).
,
.
. :
.
,
2. 14 . (A). . , (
) ( ).
. ,
(B).
Figure 2. Unilateral agenesis of the maxillary right lateral incisor in 14-year-old girl. Midline shift towards the agenesis side and deep overbite
(A). The treatment of choice was space closure on the right side and extraction of the upper left first premolar. After treatment, porcelain
veneers were placed on the intruded first premolar (substituting for the canine) and the extruded canine (replacing the missing lateral incisor).
The midline was intentionally slightly overcorrected. The tooth sizes, shapes, and colors are almost identical on the canine substitution side
and the natural left side (B).
/ Interview
3. (A,B).
(C) (D).
Figure 3. Space closure treatment for adolescent male patient with unilateral agenesis of the maxillary left lateral incisor (A,B). The
orthodontic treatment result (C), and the interdisciplinary treatment result with five porcelain laminate veneers (D).
;
. Zachrisson:
. 1.
,
/
,
.
,
( 2,3) (Rosa and Zachrisson, 2001; Zachrisson et
al., 2011). ,
/ Interview
4.
. , (A).
(B). ,
( ) (C).
, (D). .
Figure 4. Autotransplanted mandibular right second premolar to help replacing two neighboring missing maxillary incisors lost in traumatic
accident in young girl. Note mesial drift and excessive lingual crown inclination of maxillary canines and premolars, constricting the smile (A).
The situation after restoration with composite resin build-up on the transplanted premolar (B). During treatment the first premolar (to
substitute the canine) was intruded to level the gingival margins, and the canine used to replace the lateral incisor was extruded and ground
incisally (C). Three porcelain veneers were placed on the "new" canine, lateral incisor and central incisor (D). The upright canines and posterior
teeth broadened the smile significantly.
(. 4)
(. 5).
. :
, ;
. Zachrisson: .
,
/Interview
5. (A).
. (B)
( ) ( ) , (B). (C)
(D).
Figure 5. Young girl with traumatically lost maxillary right central incisor and mesial drift of the teeth (A). Orthodontic space closure was
chosen with the purpose to move the entire maxillary right quadrant one tooth width mesially. The midline was corrected (B) and gingival
leveling was achieved by intrusion of the first premolar (replacing the canine) and lateral incisor (to replace the central incisor), and extrusion
plus grinding of the canine, which was to substitute for the lateral incisor (B). The orthodontic treatment result (C), and the interdisciplinary
treatment result with five porcelain veneers (D).
8-10
(. 4).
. : ; ;
. Zachrisson:
.
,
-
who over the years have learned the technique from our
experts in Oslo have claimed that they became aware of
a multitude of small tricks that must be learned during a
live demonstration of the operation.
The contraindication for autotransplantation is a premolar with fully formed roots. Whereas the prognosis for a
successful long-term result is better than 90 per cent
when the root is from 1/2 to 3/4 developed, it may be
reduced to around 50 per cent when the root is fully
developed and the apex closed. So we do not transplant
such premolars.
Dr. Skoularikis: During the last years new technologies
/Interview
1.
Table 1. Frequent complications registered in follow-up studies of single implant-supported porcelain crowns
( )
(, )
( )
(
)
(>10-15 )
.
. 90 1/2
3/4, 50
.
, .
. :
, ,
-. ,
.
.
. Zachrisson: ,
.
(Maino et al., 2007; Kadioglu et al., 2008)
. ,
.
/Interview
6. . (C)
.
(A,B). (D).
Figure 6. Individualized retention regimen for complicated adult female patient, in whom the maxillary right first molar and left second
premolar were extracted. The mandibular arch (C) was treated non-extraction associated with marked interproximal stripping. The short
maxillary labial retainers to hold the closed extraction sites (A,B). The bonded retainer from first premolar to first premolar supplemented by
two short labial retainers to assist in holding the positions of the corrected mandibular second premolars (D).
. :
;
. Zachrisson:
.
,
,
. ,
10
/Interview
orthodontics is to re-examine our treated patients, carefully evaluate the results, and learn from previous mistakes. The JCO article that I wrote in 1997 contains an
evaluation of all the different factors that may contribute as predictors to relapse (Zachrisson, 1997). The
concepts are still valid, and provide clinical guidelines on
how improvements can be made. It is my experience that
cases finished to excellent results have better stability
than cases that, upon closer examination, have been
under-corrected or expanded.
Sound treatment principles, including maintenance of an
original normal mandibular archform, are essential for
stability. Rounding of maxillary archform during treatment will be followed by a change to a more tapered
form after retention, and the greater the treatment
change, the greater is the tendency for post-retention
change. Any short-term mechanical interference with a
complex biological system has little long-term impact.
Relapse may be due to any of the following reasons:
incomplete correction of some details of the original
malocclusion; not placing 2-2 outside 3-3; unintended or
deliberate lateral or frontal expansion; return of habits;
inadequate retention; unfavorable growth pattern;
tongue and orofacial muscle activity: imbalances
between mandibular posture and occlusal or eruptive
forces; and other causes. Key procedures to improve stability include: full correction of all rotations (comparing
the results with pretreatment models, using a mouth
mirror to check the maxillary teeth); avoiding even slight
expansion of a normal mandibular intercanine width,
using the original archform as a guide; ensure a small
interincisal angle by providing adequate torque of the
maxillary incisors, thereby reducing the risk of vertical
relapse of deep overbite correction; and use of prolonged retention with fixed retainers (Zachrisson, 1997).
Dr. Skoularikis: You have published many articles concerning retention, which, once again resulted from your
long clinical experience. Obviously, we cannot extensively cover this subject. However, could you share with us
the most important of your conclusions about bonded
retainers and how effective they are in a long term
prospective?
Dr. Zachrisson: In 2007, I published an update on our
long-term experiences with direct-bonded retainers, and
gave some clinical advice for retention in young and
adult patients (Zachrisson, 2007b). It was recommended
to use a "differential retention" approach with individu-
11
/Interview
,
),
,
,
,
(Zachrisson, 1997).
. : ,
. , . ,
;
. Zachrisson: 2007,
(Zachrisson, 2007b).
.
,
(0,030 inch,
0,076 cm)
(0,0215 inch 0,055 cm, ) ,
,
( 1,6).
(. 6).
10 15 ,
.
Hawley
. ,
.
-
12
/Interview
third molar removal associated with orthodontic therapy: either (1) between 8 to 10 years of age when these
teeth are germs and located above the second molars or
(2) between 20 to 25 years of age, or older, with the third
molars in a partially erupted position. Impacted diseasefree third molars may safely be left in situ, indefinitely, in
adults. However, extraction is indicated in cases with
root resorption in second molars.
Dr. Skoularikis: Prof. Zachrisson, on behalf of the Editorial Board and the readers of the Hellenic Orthodontic
Review I would like to thank you for this interview and
for sharing your valuable knowledge and experience.
Dr. Zachrisson: It has been a pleasure to share my
thoughts on some everyday aspects of our challenging
profession.
References
Kadioglu O, Bykyilmaz T, Zachrisson BU, Maino BG. Contact
damage to root surfaces of human premolars touching miniscrews during orthodontic treatment. Amer J Orthod Dentofac
Orthop 2008:134:353-60.
Maino G, Weiland F, Attanasi A, Zachrisson BU, Bykyilmaz T. Root
damage after contact with miniscrews: a histological assessment. J Clin Orthod 2007;41:762-766.
Rosa M, Zachrisson BU. Integrating esthetic dentistry and space
closure in patients with missing maxillary lateral incisors. J Clin
Orthod 2001;35:221-34.
Zachrisson BU. Clinical implications of recent orthodontic-periodontic research findings. Semin Orthod 1996;2:4-12.
Zachrisson BU. Important aspects of long-term stability. J Clin
Orthod 1997;31:562-83.
Zachrisson BU. Mandibular third molars and late lower arch crowding the evidence base.World J Orthod 2005;6:180-6.
Zachrisson BU. Proper quality orthodontics vs the new mechanical
systems. World J Orthod 2007a;8:308-14.
Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct-bonded retainers:
Update and clinical advice. J Clin Orthod 2007b;41:728-37.
Zachrisson BU, Rosa M, Toreskog S. Congenitally missing maxillary
lateral incisors: Canine substitution. Am J Orthod Dentofac
Orthop 2011;139:434-45.
. : . Zachrisson,
,
.
:
Reprint requests to:
Dr. Bj orn
/ U. Zachrisson
Frognerveien 51
0266 Oslo
Norway
. Zachrisson:
.
E-mail: b.u.zachrisson@odont.uio.no
13