Learning Problem Low scores Nonfiction Textual Analysis elements of the Tenth Grade Literature and Composition Student Learning Objective Exam
General Audience The primary audience consists of students in grades 9-11 taking Tenth Grade Literature and Composition at Wilkinson County High School, a Title 1 school, and the only high school in a very rural area of Eastern Middle Georgia. Because of scheduling conflicts and/or failures, not all students taking the class are 10 th graders; consequently, ages of learners range from 14-18.
Problem Identification Wilkinson County High School is in the process of obtaining Focus or Reward Status as a part of the College and Career Readiness Performance Index (CCRPI). The school has been placed on the Priority Status list as a result of Standardized Test Achievement. In order to accomplish this goal, school standardized test scores on End of Course Tests (EOCTs) must rise to an overall percentage of > 53.25% and make progress over a course of three school years.
With the inclusion of the Common Core State Standards into the curriculum, a focus is developing in all subject areas towards nonfiction textual analysis. While traditionally it has been left up to the English teachers to develop and increase literacy in the classroom, the duty now falls to all educators within the school setting, as evidenced by the literacy standards in each content-specific set of standards.
In order to help increase EOCT scores across the board, English classrooms, have begun to engage in more nonfiction reading and textual analysis to model the skill set and process needed to perform to the level of the standards in all content areas. The English teachers have found that when faced with standardized tests, such as the Tenth Grade Literature and Composition Student Learning Objective Exam, that are mainly nonfiction based, students do not perform as well as on tests that have a focus on fiction or and equal focus on fiction and nonfiction. As evidenced by the following graphic, showing the highest mastery rate of 47% on Fiction (RL standard items) on the Spring 2014 pretest, and the lowest mastery rate of 31% on Nonfiction (RI standard items).
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 3
Students lack prior knowledge and basic skills needed to accomplish learning goals presented in the curriculum, which in turn causes teachers to focus on teaching basic skills and prior knowledge instead of focusing instruction on pertinent information. Because teachers in other content areas are hesitant to take on the role of literacy instructor within the classroom, English teachers, have collaborated to endeavor in a heavily nonfiction rich curriculum for the Spring 2014 semester, with units focusing on nonfiction text analysis. With this curriculum in place, the English department holds high hopes of increasing Student Learning Objective scores and ultimately End of Course Test scores across the board in order to move up the CCRPI to the ranking of a Focus or Reward school.
Instructional Goals Students will be able to read a grade-level appropriate nonfiction text independently. Students will be able to apply text analysis skills learned in the English classroom to any discipline. Students will score equally on the nonfiction and fiction domains on standardized tests. INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 4 References
(2011). In Wilkinson County Schools Archives. Retrieved Feb. 7, 2014, from http://archives.gadoe.org/ReportingFW.aspx?PageReq=111&CountyId=758&PID=62& TID=213&T=0&FY=2011 2013, Jul. 10 ). In CLIP - Wilkinson County Schools. Retrieved Feb. 7, 2014, from http://www.wilkinson.k12.ga.us/www/ud00/0/032b87b07f604406a79c6f84a8c25c40/Pers onal_Documents/FY14%20CLIP.pdf
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 5 Part 2 Introduction The targeted group of learners consists of the 2 nd semester 10 th grade Literature and Composition students at Wilkinson County High School in Irwinton, Georgia. The students range in age from 14 to 20 with the most common age being 16. There are 11 girls and 22 boys out of whom 6 boys and 2 girls have been retained in a lower grade. The group is comprised of 8 Caucasians, 1 mixed-race, and 24 African-Americans. 5 of these students have been identified as IEP (Individualized Education Plan) served; each of these students 4 of these students have deficiencies in reading, while the remaining student has a writing deficiency.1 student has been identified as 504 Plan served. All IEP and 504 students are served in a full inclusion setting, only being pulled out for small group instruction and testing as mandated by their IEP or 504 Plan. Eighty-two percent of the 33 students have attended the school since Pre-k either for consecutive years or transiently. Eighty-eight percent of the students come from single parent homes or from homes where a grandparent is the primary caregiver. To attain this information about the learners, several methods were employed. The Georgia SLDS portal and PowerTeacher supplied the information about the students income levels, test scores, grade levels, specific education goals, and parental status. From this, the students race, gender, birthdate, and legal guardianship was established. The classroom teacher was also interviewed to supply any relevant information in regards to the students backgrounds and test scores. Entry Skills Mastery of skills that include basic reading and writing skills Able to log on to a computer or tablet Use basic internet search engines Prior Knowledge Recognize a text as either fictional of nonfictional Comprehend grade-level texts on a basic level Draw inferences from a text
This information was obtained through administration of a pretest based on the format (multiple choice) and domain weights (40% fiction, 40% nonfiction, 10% language, and 10% writing) of the Student Learning Objective. The pretest showed that 94% of the students scored less that 70% (not proficient), while only 6% scored in the proficient range (70-89%); no students scored in the exceeds range (90% and above). 31% of the learners scored in the bubble area of 59%- 69%. In addition to the pretest, past End of Course Test and Criterion Reference Competency Test scores were analyzes and disaggregated using Georgia SLDS and a data disaggregation tool created by the school district. The learners were observed as they completed the pretest and as they participate in day-to-day classroom experiences.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 6 Attitudes Towards Content & Academic Motivation The majority of the students recognize that nonfiction texts are essential to the Common Core and to the real world. 3 of the 32 students implied that they did not understand the data analysis at all. When asked about their comfort levels with nonfiction analysis, 52% of the students rated themselves as needing additional help, 36% rated themselves as having minimal understanding, and 2% of the students rated themselves as not having any understanding. When asked about their computer technology and tablet skills, 100% of the class rated themselves as knowledgeable. The learners were asked to rate their motivation to learn more about nonfictional textual analysis, and 81% stated that they wanted to learn more while 19% stated that they did not want to learn any more. These results were gathered through the use of a student survey and learner interviews.
Educational Ability Levels From the most recent EOCT Ninth Grade Literature and Composition scores, 74% (24 learners) of the learners in this class scored in the meets the standards range. The remaining 26% (9 learners) scored in the does not meet range. Even though the majority of the learners meet the overall standards requirements, in the nonfiction domain, the scores were not consistent with the overall scores. Out of 33 learners, only 5 learners meet the standard for this particular domain. After viewing the NGLC EOCT scores, the teacher was interviewed in regards to the learners abilities. It was reported that the students are functioning on varied learning levels in nonfiction textual analysis. The majority of the students require much support and practice with a given nonfiction textual analysis task.
General Learning Preferences The learners expressed a preference for hands on activities and nonlinguistic/visual representation. This information was gathered from the administration and disaggregation of a learning styles inventory. They also like color-coding, games, small group projects, and interactive activities that involve the iPads in the classroom. This information was gathered from a student survey and teacher interview.
Attitude Toward Teachers and School Approximately two-thirds of the learners expressed a deep respect and gratitude for the efforts and work of the teacher. Only 1 of the students was undecided on how she/he felt about the teacher. The rest of the students disregarded the value of the teacher as an influential figure. With regard to the school environment, the vast majority of students held positive feelings about the school and its new technology. When questioned about how they felt about coming to school, the rating shifted. 10 of the students said that they came to school because they were made to come on most days. 23 of the learners reported coming to school in order to prepare themselves for post-secondary education or employment. 19 of the learners stated that they enjoyed coming to school daily. INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 7 Group Characteristics The school is located in Wilkinson County where the median income is below the poverty level. This 89% of the 33 students receives either free or reduced lunch, which qualifies the school as a Title I school. The learners in this class are age appropriate for the English survey class; some students are in 9 th , while some students are in 11 th , and 1 student is a 20-year-old nongraduate from 2013 who is receiving extra help in order to help him pass the Georgia High School Graduation Test. The majority of the learners are African-American, and all of them speak English. All of the students are dressed appropriately, yet 10 students seem to be ill-supplied for school each day, requesting paper, pencil, or both. The learners are arranged in 5 groups. The learners were very engaged when they were using the class set of iPads, the computer, or any interactive technology. They stay on task and work together to complete the assigned tasks.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 8 Part 3
Task Analysis I conducted the task analysis using primarily a procedural analysis rather than a topic analysis due to the nature of my learning problem. The solution to the problem is found when learners begin to apply a procedure rather than information gleaned from a topic. In order to receive higher scores on the nonfiction textual analysis portions of the Tenth Grade Literature and Composition Student Learning Objective, students must not only understand specific information about the topic, but also be able to apply the procedure of analysis to any piece of nonfiction text that they encounter. To ensure that I did not miss any key steps, I conducted my own textual analysis on a nonfiction text of my choosing. This was valuable and helped me to catch several small steps initially neglected.
After completing the outline of procedures used in the textual analysis, I created a new outline with my topic analysis. In this outline, I listed all of the baseline and supplementary knowledge required as a foundation to ensure successful application of the analysis skills. The content structures identified in the topic analysis included facts (the definitions of nonfiction, literary devices, and textual analysis), concepts (the concept of annotations as a method of textual analysis, and the concept of constructed response to express inferences made from the text), and principles (every nonfiction text can be annotated and analyzed for deeper meaning).
Once the outlines were constructed, I integrated them into one task analysis outline. The majority of the topic analysis was inserted at the beginning of the outline, in order to provide appropriate background knowledge for learners. The final outline is below.
Task Analysis Outline 1. Nonfiction defined: literature that is not fictional 1.1 There are various types of nonfiction 1.1.1 Memoir 1.1.2 Newspaper Articles 1.1.3 Historical Documents 1.1.4 Biography 1.1.5 Many others 2. Rhetorical devices defined: use of language that is intended to have an effect on its audience 2.1 Types of Rhetorical Devices 2.1.1 Figurative Language 2.1.2 Ethos 2.1.3 Pathos 2.1.4 Logos INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 9 3. Textual Analysis defined: the analysis of what a text says explicitly as well as through inferences made from the text 3.1 Textual Analysis begins with Close Reading and Annotations 4. Annotations are notes made on the text while reading. 4.1 Annotations aid in comprehension and analysis 4.2 Annotations follow a particular process 4.2.1 Circle powerful words or phrases 4.2.2 Underline powerful words or phrases you do not understand 4.3.3 Put a question mark by things that raise questions 4.3.4 Put an exclamation mark by things that surprise you 4.3.5 Draw an arrow when you make a connection to the text, ideas, or experiences 4.3.6 Write important thoughts in the margin 5. Close Reading works in conjunction with annotations 5.1 Process for Close Reading 5.1.1 1 st Read: Students read and annotate 5.1.2 Students think and quick write 5.1.3 Students talk with partner 5.1.4 2 nd Read: Teacher reads, students listen 5.1.5 Think, Write, Talk 5.1.6 3 rd Read: Listen and watch while teacher reads and annotates 5.1.7 4 th Read: Students reread to find evidence 5.1.8 Respond in writing, citing evidence from the text 6. RACE is the appropriate method for responding to textual analysis prompts 6.1 Restate the question using statement format 6.2 Answer the question with an inference you have drawn from the text 6.3 Cite evidence from the text 6.4 Explain how you drew your inference from the cited text 7. Close read and annotations of Thomas Jeffersons Inaugural Address 7.1 Annotate for: 7.1.1 Rhetorical devices 7.1.2 Powerful words and phrases 7.1.3 Words and passaged that are not understood 7.1.4 Questions derived from the text 7.1.5 Surprises to the text 7.1.6 Connections to the text, ideas or experiences 7.1.7 Important thoughts 7.2 Think about what these annotations tell you about the text 7.2.1 Quick write these ideas 7.2.2 Discuss these results with a partner INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 10 7.3 Listen as the teacher reads 7.4 Think about how this rereading differed from the first reading 7.4.1 Quick write these ideas 7.4.2 Discuss these results with a partner 7.5 Listen and watch while the teacher reads and annotates 7.5.1 Make any changes needed to student annotations 7.6 Students read to find evidence 7.6.1 Evidence should support your conclusions drawn in your quick writes 7.7 Answer the following questions in written format using RACE 7.7.1 What main claim does Jefferson make in his address? 7.7.2 How do rhetorical devices help Jefferson support his claim? 7.8 Discuss with a group mate to evaluate each others answers
Subject Matter Expert (SME) I (Hope Goodner) will serve as the subject matter expert for this instructional plan. My formal education consists of a bachelors degree in English Literature with Secondary Education Certification from Mercer University in Macon, Georgia. I am currently pursuing a masters degree in Instructional Technology from Georgia Southern University in Statesboro, Georgia.
My primary qualification to serve as SME is my position as a 9 th -12 th grade English teacher at Wilkinson County High School. My job requires me to develop and implement Common Core aligned lessons on a daily basis in each of my classes. In addition, I am the only teacher at my school teaching Tenth Grade Literature and Composition, the focus course for this Instructional Design Plan. As a teacher who is trained to use data-driven instruction as a part of our School Improvement Plan, I have analyzed the data to determine the weakness of students in the area of nonfiction textual analysis and adjusted my curriculum map accordingly to reflect the change in focus for this instruction.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 11 Flowchart
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 12 Part 4
Terminal Objective 1: To cite textual evidence in an analysis of a nonfiction text Enabling Objectives: 1A. To analyze what the text says explicitly 1B. To analyze inferences drawn from the text 1C. To use the RACE (Restate, Answer, Cite, Explain) method of constructed response to demonstrate analysis
Terminal Objective 2: To analyze the theme of a nonfiction text Enabling Objectives: 2A. To identify an evidenced theme in a nonfiction text 2B. To record specific details that contribute to the theme on a textual analysis graphic organizer 2C. To explain how the theme of a nonfiction text aims to bar the repetition of history using an online group discussion
Terminal Objective 3: To communicate how an author develops and refines claims in a nonfiction text Enabling Objectives: 3A. To identify main claims stated by a nonfiction author using the Preview tool on MacBook 3B. To identity evidence that develops and refines those claims 3c. To discuss the refinement of those claims presented by a nonfiction author using a choice of Web 2.0 tool
Terminal Objective 4: To evaluate the validity and relevance of arguments and claims made in a nonfiction text. Enabling Objectives: 4A. To define propaganda techniques 4B. To identify use of propaganda, including fallacious reasoning 4C. To determine evidence of arguments and claims
Relationship between Instructional Objectives and Standards:
Instructional Objectives Common core Georgia Performance Standards 1 ELACC9-10RI1: Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. 1A 1B 1C 2 ELACC9-10RI2: Determine a central idea of a text and analyze its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text. 2A 2B 2C 3 ELACC9-10RI5: Analyze in detail how an authors ideas or claims are developed and refined by particular sentences, paragraphs, or larger portions of a text (e.g., a section or chapter). 3A 3B 3C 4 ELACC9-10RI8: Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify false statements and fallacious reasoning. 4A 4B 4C
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 14 Part 5
Instructional Strategies Goals Objectives UDL Assessment Lesson 1: Students will divide into pairs and complete the Explicit vs. Implicit Textual Information chart based on information found in the article. Students will compare their answers in a brief large group discussion using Bubble.us. Students will be able to apply the textual analysis knowledge learned in the English classroom to any discipline.
Terminal Objective 1: To cite textual evidence in an analysis of a nonfiction text Enabling Objectives: 1A. To analyze what the text says explicitly 1B. To analyze inferences drawn from the text 1C. To use the RACE (Restate, Answer, Cite, Explain) method of constructed response to demonstrate analysis
Learning environment is differentiated by the nature of the online learning environment. The Mindmeister brainstorm will be used as formative assessment to determine readiness for progression to the next lesson. The Bubble.us group discussion activity provides students with opportunities to assess their own findings in the context of the classroom as a whole. Lesson 2: Student groups will then read Women Who Shaped the Constitution by Rosalynn Carter. Groups will identify the main claim and evidence that develops and refines it. They Students will be able to apply the textual analysis knowledge learned in the English classroom to any discipline.
Terminal Objective 3: To communicate how an author develops and refines claims in a nonfiction text Enabling Objectives: 3A. To identify main claims stated by a nonfiction author Students may choose to respond in written format, or to create a visual explaining their response, to record themselves answering the question. Audio recording of the paragraph The paraphrase will be used as formative assessment do determine if students are progressing at the expected rate in their comprehension of authors main claims and evidence. The INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 15 will then Pintegrate that information into a paraphrased version of the passage. They will also develop three standardized test questions pertaining to the passage, its main claim, the development of the claim, and textual evidence supporting their analysis. Differentiation: This may be presented using any Web 2.0 tool of their choosing. 3B. To identity evidence that develops and refines those claims 3C. To discuss the development and refinement of those claims
will be available for learners who prefer it. This may be presented using any Web 2.0 tool of their choosing.
development of the standardized test questions will be assessed to determine student mastery of in-depth textual analysis. Lesson 3: Have students read Letter from Birmingham Jail and annotate it for rhetorical devices using the Preview tool on their MacBooks. Students will work in pairs to elaborate on how their knowledge or rhetorical strategies is interrelated to Students will be able to apply the textual analysis knowledge learned in the English classroom to any discipline.
Terminal Objective 4: To evaluate the validity and relevance of arguments and claims made in a nonfiction text. Enabling Objectives: 4A. To define and recognize propaganda techniques 4B. To identify use of fallacious reasoning Students will use visuals, written responses to respond to the brainstorm prompt. The teacher will assign students, based on ability level, an appropriate set of information to detail in the Web 2.0 presentation. Students may choose which media examples The graphic organizer will be used to assess student mastery of successful and fallacious reasoning. INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 16 Martin Luther King Jr.s use of them using a graphic organizer. In this graphic organizer, they will identify successful and fallacious reasoning and make note of evidence from the text that supports the authors use of them in his claims. Differentiation: The use of different nonlinguistic representation and cooperative pairs determined by the teachers data will be applied to students as differentiation techniques 4C. To determine evidence of arguments and claims
they will use for their presentations. The use of different nonlinguistic representation and cooperative pairs determined by the teachers data will be applied to students as differentiation techniques.
Lesson 4: Have students work in pairs to read a selection from Elie Wiesels Night. Students will maintain their pair partnership Students will be able to read a grade-level appropriate nonfiction text independently and analyze the text thoroughly.
Terminal Objective 2: To analyze the theme of a nonfiction text Enabling Objectives: 2A. To identify an evidenced A video of the author reciting this selection will be available for auditory and visual learners. The assistance of the teacher will also be provided The Web 2.0 presentation will be used as an assessment to determine student mastery of nonfiction textual analysis by ensuring that INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 17 to identify a theme in the selection and specific details that contribute to the development of the theme. The pair should use the collaborative tool Mocromobs to record their discussion and summative conclusions. As a final element, they will create an explanation of how their theme statement aims to bar the repetition of historical injustices. They will then use a Web 2.0 presentation tool to create an online poster detailing these findings. Differentiation: Students will have their choice of Web 2.0 tools to use. theme in a nonfiction text 2B. To record specific details that contribute to the theme on a textual analysis graphic organizer 2C. To explain how the theme of a nonfiction text aims to bar the repetition of history
through prompting additions to the collaborative chat. Students will have their choice of Web 2.0 tools to use.
students are able to analyze a text in depth enough to determine how its theme can be applied to life today.
The assessments that I have created are performance-based rather than standardized-test-like assessments. I want students to be able to apply the concepts that they have learned in a more in- depth and collaborative manner than a standardized test format allows. At the end of the unit, students should be able to demonstrate what they have learned by being able to analyze any grade-level-appropriate nonfiction text. INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 18 Pre-test/Post-test This test will be given to the students both before the online module is started and after the online module is completes. Students are to answer the questions online and submit the answers to the teacher.
Directions: Answer the following questions. When completed, press submit to complete your work. 1. How is textual evidence important to textual analysis? 2. What is the different between explicit and implicit statements? 3. How can an author further develop a claim he or she has made? 4. How does focus affect an authors claim and development? 5. How does one make an argument convincing? 6. How does theme relate to an authors main claim?
Pre-test/Post-test Answer Key 1. It provides proof that the conclusions one draws from a text are in fact founded in the text and not merely conjecture. 2. Explicit statements directly state an idea, while implicit statements imply meaning other than what the words directly say. 3. An author may further develop a claim made in the text by providing relevant information in support of that idea that follows a logical path. 4. If a writer does not stay focused throughout his/her piece, information irrelevant to the main claim may be included which does not develop the claim or theme found in the work. 5. A writer may make an argument more convincing by using rhetorical devices and propaganda techniques. 6. Theme relates to an authors main claim by delivering an implicit message about life that the reader should take away from the reading of the text.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 19 Objective 1: To cite textual evidence in an analysis of a nonfiction text
Lesson 1 Brainstorm Activity Using Mindmeister.com, a collaborative brainstorming tool, share ideas with your classmates about how providing evidence from the text is important to the process of analyzing a text. Be sure to think of reasoning techniques we have discussed in our fiction unit.
Lesson 1 Brainstorm Activity Answer Key Students should make mention of: a. How an answer must come from the text and their heads b. How textual evidence ensures that their conclusions are based in the text and not their own external ideas c. How RACE ensures that textual evidence is provided
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 20 Lesson 1 Explicit vs. Implicit Chart and Discussion
Directions: Read the article Teaching Students to use Anchor Standard #1: Textual Evidence in the Common Core Classroom on your MacBook using the Preview application. Highlight information that you find relevant. Then complete the following chart. Make sure to provide evidence from the text. Share your chart and your ideas with your classmates on Bubble.us,
HOW ARE EXPLICIT INFORMATION AND IMPLICIT INFORMATION DIFFERENT? FILL IN YOUR ANSWERS IN THE ARROWS.
HOW DO EXPLICIT INFORMATION AND IMPLICIT INFORMATION WORK TOGETHER? FILL IN YOUR ANSWERS IN THE ARROWS.
Explicit Implicit Explicit Implicit INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 21 Lesson 1 Explicit vs. Implicit Chart and Discussion Answer Key
HOW ARE EXPLICIT INFORMATION AND IMPLICIT INFORMATION DIFFERENT? FILL IN YOUR ANSWERS IN THE ARROWS.
Students should cite evidence from the third paragraph that explains the explicit means directly stated, while implicit means implied. They should make note that in literature very few things are explicit, most of them being implied by the author. They should also make note that they must be able to infer in order to understand the implicit meaning in a text.
HOW DO EXPLICIT INFORMATION AND IMPLICIT INFORMATION WORK TOGETHER? FILL IN YOUR ANSWERS IN THE ARROWS.
Students should cite evidence from the third paragraph that oftentimes what may appear to be explicit actually contains an implicit message. They should also note how explicit statements are needed in order to build a basis for the implicit statements about which they must infer meaning.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 22 Objective 3: To communicate how an author develops and refines claims in a nonfiction text
Lesson 2 Focus Activity
Directions: Read the first sentence of the following paragraph. On the line directly under the paragraph, record what you and your partner discuss as possible topics for the paragraph. Then read the entire paragraph, analyzing it for focus. Highlight everything that pertains to the topic of the first sentence in yellow. If anything wanders off topic, highlight it in blue. Discuss this all with your partner using Teambox, especially if you find that the paragraph loses focus. Explain why you think all of these things happen. Finally, record possible titles for this paragraph on the line below.
My room is the most comfortable room in my house. I really enjoy having my TV, DVD, Computer, VCR, Game Boy, and CD player all in one place that I can truly call my very own. The bed is comfortable, when I can find it. Often its covered with clothes, school books, papers, CDs and junk. I like to hang out with my friends in my room and turn the music up loud. Thats fun. Most of my friends like the same music I do, like Def Leppard and Iron Maiden. Other friends like more classic rock, like Bruce Springsteen. We get along okay though. Sometimes I just lay there and think about my day. I enjoy thinking, because it helps me concentrate.
Possible topics: ______________________________________________________________________________
Possible titles: ______________________________________________________________________________
Lesson 2 Focus Activity Answer Key
My room is the most comfortable room in my house. I really enjoy having my TV, DVD, Computer, VCR, Game Boy, and CD player all in one place that I can truly call my very own. The bed is comfortable, when I can find it. Often its covered with clothes, school books, papers, CDs and junk. I like to hang out with my friends in my room and turn the music up loud. Thats fun. Most of my friends like the same music I do, like Def Leppard and Iron Maiden. Other friends like more classic rock, like Bruce Springsteen. We get along okay though. Sometimes I just lay there and think about my day. I enjoy thinking, because it helps me concentrate.
Possible topics: Comparing and contrasting different rooms, pros and cons of the authors bedroom INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 23
Possible titles: Answers may vary
Discussion postings: Students should note that the paragraph wanders off topic. They should also note that the author loses focus when he begins talking about his and his friends shared interest in music. They should also note that this loss of focus happens because of the stream-of-consciousness narrative perspective used by the author.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 24 Lesson 2 Women Who Shaped the Constitution Standardized Test Question Generation
Directions: Read Women Who Shaped the Constitution by Rosalynn Carter. Indentify the main claim the author makes in the space provided. Highlight evidence that develops and refines the main claim in green. Then, develop 3 standardized tezt questions pertaining to the passage, its main claim, and the development of the claim. You will present your test questions using any Web 2.0 tool of your choice.
Women Who Shaped the Constitution BY ROSALYNN CARTER
REVOLUTIONARIES
When the Founding Fathers met in Philadelphia in 1787 to draft the Constitution, they did not ha ve womens rights on their minds. They did not grant women the right to vote or a voice in the g overnment that was being formed. There was a simple reason for this neglect: both the Constituti on and the Bill of Rights were based on an eighteenth century concept of justice and equality that was an exclusively white, male system of law and order. The Founding Fathers were simply the patriarchal products of their time.
The prevailing thought of the day was that the American voter must be independent and uncoerc ed. Men without property could not be independent and uncoerced because they were vulnerable to their landlords. Married women were subject to their husbands wishes, so it followed that they could not be independent voters. Under this reasoning, one would think that unmarried prop ertied women would have the vote, but as John Adams said, You have to draw the line somewhere!
Our Constitution was not perfect when it was signed; it is not perfect today. But our forefathers had the wisdom to make it possible for us to amend it. Thus, even without formal constitutional rights and lacking the right to vote throughout most of our history, the influence of women on the constitutional process, from the beginning, has been significant.
Who are these invisible women who struggled to protect our rightsor to demand them? They need to be remembered so they can be institutionalized as contributors to our democratic heritage.
Abigail Smith Adams is one of the few women of the eighteenth century who has remained in th e public eye. There are several reasons for the continued interest in her life. Hundreds of the lette rs she wrote over her lifetime were preserved by her family. She also lived during an important era of American history and was related to famous men. Her husband, John Adams, w INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 25 as one of the founders of the nation and the second president of the United States. Her son, John Quincy Adams, was the sixth president, as well as a diplomat and member of Congress for more than two decades.
Abigail was a woman of her times and believed that a womans role was domestic. But she was intelligent, self-educated, and articulate and could understand and comment upon political issues, as her letters show. And although she did not shape her husbands policies, her correspondence with him, as illustrated in the following excerpt, informs us of the desire of some women of that period to be included in affairs of state.
Abigail Adams to John Adams, as he sat at the Second Continental Congress, March 31, 1776. [I]n the new code of laws which I suppose it will be necessary for you to make, I desire you would remember the ladies and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors. Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the husbands. Remember, all men would be tyrant s if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to fom ent a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voi ce, or representation.
One woman who influenced the thinking of the day when the Constitution was being written was Mercy Otis Warren. She was born into a politically prominent family in Massachusetts, and at a time when other females were learning flowery letter writing, she was sharing her brothers Harv ard College classwork. She married a Massachusetts legislator who encouraged her involvement with public affairs, and she was known by most of the framers and founders of the Constitution, i ncluding George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Samuel Adams, John Adams, and Thomas Jef ferson. She corresponded with them about social and political issues, the ideals and ideas of the d ay.
During the growing protest among the Colonies against British rule, Warren and her husband we re part of a small circle of patriots, including Samuel Adams, John Adams, and John Hancock, w ho met in their homes to exchange ideas about forming a government for this new country, debat ing the structure, function, and processes of colonial, confederate, and constitutional government s. Although she never strayed far beyond Boston, Mercy Warrens extensive correspondence, satirical plays, poetry, and antiFederalist tracts were read and discussed in all the states and in Europe. Her writings reflected on the very essences of liberty and democracy as she argued for the complete protection of human rights. She influenced the language of the Constitution even though she was not allowed to be present at the convention that adopted it. Influenced by her reading of John Locke and other Enlightenment philosophers, Warren once wrote that man is born free and possessed of certain unalienable rightsa principle now etched in the Declaration of Independence.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 26 Main Claim ______________________________________________________________________________
Lesson 2 Women Who Shaped the Constitution Standardized Test Question Generation Answer Key
Women Who Shaped the Constitution BY ROSALYNN CARTER
REVOLUTIONARIES
When the Founding Fathers met in Philadelphia in 1787 to draft the Constitution, they did not ha ve womens rights on their minds. They did not grant women the right to vote or a voice in the g overnment that was being formed. There was a simple reason for this neglect: both the Constituti on and the Bill of Rights were based on an eighteenth century concept of justice and equality that was an exclusively white, male system of law and order. The Founding Fathers were simply the patriarchal products of their time.
The prevailing thought of the day was that the American voter must be independent and uncoerc ed. Men without property could not be independent and uncoerced because they were vulnerable to their landlords. Married women were subject to their husbands wishes, so it followed that they could not be independent voters. Under this reasoning, one would think that unmarried prop ertied women would have the vote, but as John Adams said, You have to draw the line somewhere!
Our Constitution was not perfect when it was signed; it is not perfect today. But our forefathers had the wisdom to make it possible for us to amend it. Thus, even without formal constitutional rights and lacking the right to vote throughout most of our history, the influence of women on the constitutional process, from the beginning, has been significant. INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 28
Who are these invisible women who struggled to protect our rightsor to demand them? They need to be remembered so they can be institutionalized as contributors to our democratic heritage.
Abigail Smith Adams is one of the few women of the eighteenth century who has remained in th e public eye. There are several reasons for the continued interest in her life. Hundreds of the lette rs she wrote over her lifetime were preserved by her family. She also lived during an important era of American history and was related to famous men. Her husband, John Adams, w as one of the founders of the nation and the second president of the United States. Her son, John Quincy Adams, was the sixth president, as well as a diplomat and member of Congress for more than two decades.
Abigail was a woman of her times and believed that a womans role was domestic. But she was intelligent, self-educated, and articulate and could understand and comment upon political issues, as her letters show. And although she did not shape her husbands policies, her correspondence with him, as illustrated in the following excerpt, informs us of the desire of some women of that period to be included in affairs of state.
Abigail Adams to John Adams, as he sat at the Second Continental Congress, March 31, 1776. [I]n the new code of laws which I suppose it will be necessary for you to make, I desire you would remember the ladies and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors. Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the husbands. Remember, all men would be tyrant s if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to fom ent a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voi ce, or representation.
One woman who influenced the thinking of the day when the Constitution was being written was Mercy Otis Warren. She was born into a politically prominent family in Massachusetts, and at a time when other females were learning flowery letter writing, she was sharing her brothers Harv ard College classwork. She married a Massachusetts legislator who encouraged her involvement with public affairs, and she was known by most of the framers and founders of the Constitution, i ncluding George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Samuel Adams, John Adams, and Thomas Jef ferson. She corresponded with them about social and political issues, the ideals and ideas of the d ay.
During the growing protest among the Colonies against British rule, Warren and her husband we re part of a small circle of patriots, including Samuel Adams, John Adams, and John Hancock, w ho met in their homes to exchange ideas about forming a government for this new country, debat ing the structure, function, and processes of colonial, confederate, and constitutional government INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 29 s. Although she never strayed far beyond Boston, Mercy Warrens extensive correspondence, satirical plays, poetry, and antiFederalist tracts were read and discussed in all the states and in Europe. Her writings reflected on the very essences of liberty and democracy as she argued for the complete protection of human rights. She influenced the language of the Constitution even though she was not allowed to be present at the convention that adopted it. Influenced by her reading of John Locke and other Enlightenment philosophers, Warren once wrote that man is born free and possessed of certain unalienable rightsa principle now etched in the Declaration of Independence.
Main Claim Women have had political influence since the revolutionary period.
Standardized Test Questions Questions and Answers will vary but they should stay along the lines of the following questions. 1. What is the main idea of this passage?
2. What evidence supports the main idea of this passage?
3. What was true of both Abigail Adams and Mercy Otis Warren?
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 30 Objective 4: To evaluate the validity and relevance of arguments and claims made in a nonfiction text.
Lesson 3 Web 2.0 Rhetoric Presentation
After reviewing the information on rhetorical devices, propaganda techniques, and fallacious reasoning, create a Web2.0 presentation detailing them. You will organize them into a visual representation that relates each element to either a print advertisement, a radio commercial, or a television commercial.
Presentations will vary. They will be assessed using the rubric checklist on the assignment outline.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 32 Lesson 3 Letter from Birmingham Jail Graphic Organizer
Directions: Read Letter from Birmingham Jail and annotate it for rhetorical devices using the preview tool on your MacBook. Discuss with your group, using Teambox, how your knowledge of rhetoric helps you comprehend and analyze Martin Luther King Jr.s famous letter. As you discuss, you will fill out the graphic organizer. Include a passage from the text, a checkmark to determine if the reasoning is successful or fallacious, and your explanation of why.
Passage From Text Successful? Fallacious? Why
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 33 Lesson 3 Letter from Birmingham Jail Graphic Organizer Answer Key
Answers will vary. Students will note that none of the reasoning is fallacious. Explanations should refer to the text and explain how the text demonstrates an element of rhetoric.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 34 Objective 2: To analyze the theme of a nonfiction text
Lesson 4 A Day Away RACE Directions: Below is a discussion prompt. Read the selection and identify a theme of the work, making sure to present your claim as well as evidence from the text that supports it in the form of RACE. You should submit your answers using Micromobs.
A Day Away Maya Angelou
Every person needs to take one day away. A day in which one consciously separates the past from the future. Jobs, family, employers, and friends can exist one day without any one of us, and if our egos permit us to confess, they could exist eternally in our absence.
Each person deserves a day away in which no problems are confronted, no solutions searched for. Each of us needs to withdraw from the cares which will not withdraw from us. We need hours of aimless wandering or spaces of time sitting on park benches, observing the mysterious world of ants and the canopy of treetops.
If we step away for a time, we are not, as many may think and some will accuse, being irresponsible, but rather we are preparing ourselves to more ably perform our duties and discharge our obligations.
When I return home, I am always surprised to find some questions I sought to evade had been answered and some entanglements I had hoped to flee had become unraveled in my absence.
_____________________________________________________________________________ INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 35 Lesson 4 A Day Away RACE Answer Key
Answers will vary, but they should remain somewhere close to:
The theme of A Day Away by Maya Angelou is that self-energizing oneself is necessary. According to the passage, if we take this time, we are not being being irresponsible, but rather we are preparing ourselves to more ably perform our duties and discharge our obligations (lines 11-13). This lesson about life serves to remind us that oftentimes what appears to be selfish, is oftentimes selfless.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 36 Lesson 4 Night Theme Activity
Directions: Work in pairs to read the selection from Elie Wiesels Night on pages 393-600 in your course textbook. Using Micromobs, identify a theme in the selection and specific details that contribute to the development of the theme. Finally, create an explanation of how your pairs theme statement aims to bar the repetition of historical injustices.
Lesson 4 Night Theme Activity Key
Answers will vary, but they should stay along the lines of the following:
Possible Themes: Silence in the Face of Atrocities is Sin Humans Fall into Inhumanity When Left Unchecked Maintaining Faith through Struggle Helps One Survive
Explanation: Students should note that Wiesels purpose in writing his tale was so that the commissions of such vile crimes would never go undisturbed again.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 37 Part 6: Content Sequencing and Instructional Strategies
Instructional Sequence Sequence Description Objective 1 Cite textual evidence in an analysis of a nonfiction text 1 2 Communicate how an author develops and refines claims in a nonfiction text 3 3 Evaluate validity and relevance of arguments and claims made in a nonfiction text 4 4 Analyze theme of a nonfiction text 2
Sequencing Justification This sequence builds on concepts in learner-related order. The learner will proceed through the lessons in an order that places information in order of increasing difficulty, with identifiable prerequisites and familiar elements addressed in the beginning. The sequence also alternates reading and group discussion with hands-on activities to maintain high learner interest, motivation, and involvement. Finally, this sequence allows the learner to self-generate questions and possible solutions that most likely are addressed by the next step of development in the learner-related sequence.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 38 Lesson 1: A Refresher on Citing Textual Evidence
Terminal Objective 1: To cite textual evidence in an analysis of a nonfiction text Enabling Objectives: 1A. To analyze what the text says explicitly 1B. To analyze inferences drawn from the text 1C. To use the RACE (Restate, Answer, Cite, Explain) method of constructed response to demonstrate analysis
Initial Presentation: Have class brainstorm how textual evidence is important to textual analysis using Mindmeister.com. Students should remember reasoning and techniques (including RACE) from their fiction unit. Second, direct class to individually read the article Teaching Students to use Anchor Standard #1: Textual Evidence in the Common Core Classroom on their MacBooks using the Preview application and highlight information that they find relevant for group discussion.
Generative Strategy: Students will divide into pairs and complete the Explicit vs. Implicit Textual Information chart based on information found in the article. Students will compare their answers in a brief large group discussion using Bubble.us.
UDL: Students may choose to respond in written format, or to create a visual explaining their response, to record themselves responding to classmates. Kerr (2010) stated that a best practice for an online high school classroom is to provide opportunities for student choice (p. 29).
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 39 Lesson 2: How Do Authors Develop and Refine Claims
Terminal Objective 3: To communicate how an author develops and refines claims in a nonfiction text Enabling Objectives: 3A. To identify main claims stated by a nonfiction author 3B. To identity evidence that develops and refines those claims 3C. To discuss the development and refinement of those claims
Motivational Strategy: Ask students to speculate how determining the development of an authors claim might affect student comprehension and analysis. Students should think about where in the future this type of skill might be relevant. Responses will be given using Bubble.us. Differentiation: Students may choose to respond in written format, or to create a visual explaining their response, to record themselves answering the question.
Initial Presentation: Students will divide into groups of 4 determined by previous data. Students will review the teacher statement: Focus in writing means, among other things, maintaining a central idea throughout the piece. With this in mind, students will then, in their peer groups and using Teambox, read the first sentence of the focus paragraph and discuss what the paragraph might focus on and discuss. They will read the entire paragraph and analyze it for focus. They should note that the paragraph wanders off topic, where the author lost focus, how they know this, and why they believe this has happened. Students should then brainstorm titles that they believe would be appropriate to convey the authors main point.
Generative Strategy: Student groups will then read Women Who Shaped the Constitution by Rosalynn Carter. Groups will identify the main claim and evidence that develops and refines it. They will then integrate that information into a paraphrased version of the passage. They will also develop three standardized test questions pertaining to the passage, its main claim, the development of the claim, and textual evidence supporting their analysis.
UDL: Audio recording of the paragraph will be available for learners who prefer it. Morra (2010) supports the principle of providing multiple means of representation, stating that it not only gives students multiple ways of acquiring information, but also gives various ways to interact with that information (p. 47). Standardized test questions will be presented using any Web 2.0 tool of their choosing. Kerr (2010) stated that a best practice for an online high school classroom is to provide opportunities for student choice (p. 29).
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 40 Lesson 3: Determining Relevancy and Validity of Claims
Terminal Objective 4: To evaluate the validity and relevance of arguments and claims made in a nonfiction text. Enabling Objectives: 4A. To define and recognize propaganda techniques 4B. To identify use of fallacious reasoning 4C. To determine evidence of arguments and claims
Motivational Strategy: Ask students to speculate on how they would make an argument convincing. Students should cite times in the past when they have tried to convince someone of something and either failed or succeeded. They should think about what made their argument successful or not. This will be recorded using Wisemapping.com. Differentiation: Students will use visuals, written responses to respond to the brainstorm prompt.
Initial Presentation: Students will examine information on rhetorical strategies, propaganda techniques, and fallacious reasoning. Students will create a Web 2.0 presentation detailing the various types of propaganda and fallacious reasoning. Have students organize the rhetorical strategies, propaganda techniques, and fallacious reasoning into a visual representation that relates each element to either a print advertisement, a radio commercial, or a television commercial.
Generative Strategy: Have students read Letter from Birmingham Jail and annotate it for rhetorical devices using the Preview tool on their MacBooks. Students will work in pairs to elaborate on how their knowledge or rhetorical strategies is interrelated to Martin Luther King Jr.s use of them using a graphic organizer. In this graphic organizer, they will identify successful and fallacious reasoning and make note of evidence from the text that supports the authors use of them in his claims.
UDL: The teacher will assign students, based on ability level and interest/engagement, an appropriate set of information to detail in the Web 2.0 presentation. Students may choose which media examples they will use for their presentations. This provides for multiple means of engagement by providing, as Rose and Gravel (2010) suggest options that vary levels of challenge and support (p. 9). The use of different nonlinguistic representation and cooperative pairs determined by the teachers data will be applied to students as differentiation techniques. Rose and Gravel (2010) posit using options that illustrate key concepts nonlinguistically (p. 5).
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 41 Lesson 4: How the Use of Rhetoric and Evidence Supports Theme
Terminal Objective 2: To analyze the theme of a nonfiction text Enabling Objectives: 2A. To identify an evidenced theme in a nonfiction text 2B. To record specific details that contribute to the theme on a textual analysis graphic organizer 2C. To explain how the theme of a nonfiction text aims to bar the repetition of history
Initial Presentation: Present students with Maya Angelous A Day Away as a discussion prompt using Micromobs. Students should read the selection and identify a theme of the work; they should make sure to present their claim along with evidence from the text that supports it in the format of RACE.
Generative Strategy: Have students work in pairs to read a selection from Elie Wiesels Night. Students will maintain their pair partnership to identify a theme in the selection and specific details that contribute to the development of the theme. The pair should use the collaborative tool Mocromobs to record their discussion and summative conclusions. As a final element, they will create an explanation of how their theme statement aims to bar the repetition of historical injustices. They will then use a Web 2.0 presentation tool to create an online poster detailing these findings.
UDL: A video of the author reciting this selection will be available for auditory and visual learners. Rose and Gravel (2010) propose including options that customize the display of information; options that provide alternatives for auditory information; and options that provide alternatives for visual information (p. 5). The assistance of the teacher will also be provided through prompting additions to the collaborative chat. Suggested by Rose and Gravel (2010), this provides options in the scaffolds for practice and performance (p. 7) by the teacher offering support to individuals as needed. Students will have their choice of Web 2.0 tools to use. Kerr (2010) stated that a best practice for an online high school classroom is to provide opportunities for student choice (p. 29).
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 42 References
Kerr, Shantia (2010). Tips, Tools, and Techniques for Teaching in the Online High School Classroom. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, v55 n1 p28-31.
Morra, Thom & Reynolds, Jim (2010). Universal Design for Learning: Application for technology-enhanced learning. Inquiry 15 (1):43-51.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2013). Designing effective instruction. (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Rose, D.H., and Gravel, J.W. (2010). Universal design for learning. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B.McGraw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (119124). Oxford: Elsevier. Retrieved from www.udlcenter.org/sites/udlcenter.org/files/TechnologyandLearning.pdf
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 43 Part 7: Design of Instruction Instructional Strategies Goals Objectives UDL Assessment Lesson 1: Students will divide into pairs and complete the Explicit vs. Implicit Textual Information chart based on information found in the article. Students will compare their answers in a brief large group discussion using Bubble.us. Students will be able to apply the textual analysis knowledge learned in the English classroom to any discipline.
Terminal Objective 1: To cite textual evidence in an analysis of a nonfiction text Enabling Objectives: 1A. To analyze what the text says explicitly 1B. To analyze inferences drawn from the text 1C. To use the RACE (Restate, Answer, Cite, Explain) method of constructed response to demonstrate analysis
Learning environment is differentiated by the nature of the online learning environment. The Mindmeister brainstorm will be used as formative assessment to determine readiness for progression to the next lesson. The Bubble.us group discussion activity provides students with opportunities to assess their own findings in the context of the classroom as a whole. Lesson 2: Student groups will then read Women Who Shaped the Constitution by Rosalynn Carter. Groups will identify the main claim and evidence that develops and refines it. They will then Students will be able to apply the textual analysis knowledge learned in the English classroom to any discipline.
Terminal Objective 3: To communicate how an author develops and refines claims in a nonfiction text Enabling Objectives: 3A. To identify main claims stated by a nonfiction author 3B. To identity Students may choose to respond in written format, or to create a visual explaining their response, to record themselves answering the question. Audio recording of the paragraph will be available The paraphrase will be used as formative assessment do determine if students are progressing at the expected rate in their comprehension of authors main claims and evidence. The development of INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 44 integrate that information into a paraphrased version of the passage. They will also develop three standardized test questions pertaining to the passage, its main claim, the development of the claim, and textual evidence supporting their analysis. Differentiation: This may be presented using any Web 2.0 tool of their choosing. evidence that develops and refines those claims 3C. To discuss the development and refinement of those claims
for learners who prefer it. This may be presented using any Web 2.0 tool of their choosing.
the standardized test questions will be assessed to determine student mastery of in-depth textual analysis. Lesson 3: Have students read Letter from Birmingham Jail and annotate it for rhetorical devices using the Preview tool on their MacBooks. Students will work in pairs to elaborate on how their knowledge or rhetorical strategies is interrelated to Martin Luther Students will be able to apply the textual analysis knowledge learned in the English classroom to any discipline.
Terminal Objective 4: To evaluate the validity and relevance of arguments and claims made in a nonfiction text. Enabling Objectives: 4A. To define and recognize propaganda techniques 4B. To identify use of fallacious reasoning 4C. To determine Students will use visuals, written responses to respond to the brainstorm prompt. The teacher will assign students, based on ability level, an appropriate set of information to detail in the Web 2.0 presentation. Students may choose which media examples they will use for The graphic organizer will be used to assess student mastery of successful and fallacious reasoning. INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 45 King Jr.s use of them using a graphic organizer. In this graphic organizer, they will identify successful and fallacious reasoning and make note of evidence from the text that supports the authors use of them in his claims. Differentiation: The use of different nonlinguistic representation and cooperative pairs determined by the teachers data will be applied to students as differentiation techniques evidence of arguments and claims
their presentations. The use of different nonlinguistic representation and cooperative pairs determined by the teachers data will be applied to students as differentiation techniques.
Lesson 4: Have students work in pairs to read a selection from Elie Wiesels Night. Students will maintain their pair partnership to identify a Students will be able to read a grade-level appropriate nonfiction text independently and analyze the text thoroughly.
Terminal Objective 2: To analyze the theme of a nonfiction text Enabling Objectives: 2A. To identify an evidenced theme in a A video of the author reciting this selection will be available for auditory and visual learners. The assistance of the teacher will also be provided through The Web 2.0 presentation will be used as an assessment to determine student mastery of nonfiction textual analysis by ensuring that students are able INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 46 theme in the selection and specific details that contribute to the development of the theme. The pair should use the collaborative tool Mocromobs to record their discussion and summative conclusions. As a final element, they will create an explanation of how their theme statement aims to bar the repetition of historical injustices. They will then use a Web 2.0 presentation tool to create an online poster detailing these findings. Differentiation: Students will have their choice of Web 2.0 tools to use. nonfiction text 2B. To record specific details that contribute to the theme on a textual analysis graphic organizer 2C. To explain how the theme of a nonfiction text aims to bar the repetition of history
prompting additions to the collaborative chat. Students will have their choice of Web 2.0 tools to use.
to analyze a text in depth enough to determine how its theme can be applied to life today.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 47 Part 8 At the end of this online module, I will collect the learner evaluation by providing an online survey for students to complete. I will also ask another SME to complete the online module and a set of interview questions. The SME I will use is Nicole Stone, who is a current high school English teacher at Wilkinson County High School. She has been teaching for 9 years and has been at Wilkinson County High School for 4 years.
Survey for the Online Learner 1. After completing this module, how confident are you in your abilities to analyze any grade-level-appropriate nonfiction text? 1-not confident, 2-a little confident, 3-not sure, 4-very confident, 5-I already knew how to do this
2. How easy or difficult did you find the module for your learning level? 1-too easy, 2-a little easy, 3-right on target, 4-a little difficult, 5-too difficult
3. Were the directions clear and easy to follow? 1-not clear, 2-a little clear, 3-not sure, 4-pretty clear, 5-very clear
4. Is the topic something that you were interested in learning? 1-not interested, 2-a little interested, 3-not sure, 4-pretty interested, 5-very interested
5. Please list anything about this module that you did not understand.
6. Please list any ideas that you have that might make this module better.
Interview Questions for the SME After completing the online module, do you think the learner is provided with all the necessary content to complete the module successfully? 1. Is there anything left out of the module that you feel should be included? If yes, please explain.
2. Is there anything included in the module that you feel should be omitted? If yes, please explain.
3. Do you think the content is appropriate for the target audience? If no, please explain.
4. Do you think the objectives are met by the content provided? If no, please explain.
5. Do you think the assessments are relevant to the content topic? If no, please explain. INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN PROJECT 48 6. Do you think UDL principles were followed and appropriate? If no, please explain.
7. Is there anything that you think would make this module better? If yes, please explain.
After all of the online surveys and the face-to-face interview have been completed, I will analyze the data qualitatively in order to see the perspectives of the students and SME. I will look for trends in the responses that could possibly improve the program. I will also consider the comments and suggestions made by the students and the SME.