Im just wondering . . .

By Colleen Tronson
They say its a womans body and her choice, and identify that choice in the womb as tissue.
They defend a womans right to terminate said tissue.
They claim most women dont regret terminating tissue.

But when that tissue is born, they rise to defend and protect the tissues future by opposing adoption.
They claim most women regret making an adoption plan for their tissue.
But its only tissue, what is there to regret?

They call adoption child stealing, but its only tissue, right?
Does an abortionist steal a childs life away through abortion or just steal tissue?
Maybe its only stealing when an adoption agency helps a mother with her tissue?
Why are women, who abort tissue, not considered dangerous parents?
Why are people wishing to adopt that same tissue scrutinized as potentially harmful to the tissue?
If the only people that can love tissue are the biological parents, why is there so much tissue abuse?
Doesnt the tissue lose everything in abortion and gain everything when left alone?
Is the problem, really, when tissue is left alone abortionists have everything to lose?
Is the tissue more valuable or more worthy of defense depending on who gets paid?

Do you wonder, too?