ADMIN LAW - Atty.

Gallant Soriano

Assignment # 1
1. Diff. definitions of Admin Law (At least 5)
2. Diff. elements of Admin Law (At least 5)
3. Cases:
- IRON AND STEEL AUTHORITY V. CA 249 SCRA
538http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1995/oct1995/gr_102976_1995.html
- LUZON DEVELOPMENT BANK v. ASSOCIATION OF LUZON DEVELOPMENT BANK
EMPLOYEES
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1995/oct1995/gr_120319_1995.html
4. Scope of Admin Law
5. 2 Concerns of Admin Law
6. Origin & Development of Admin Law
Cases:
- SOLID HOMES INC. V. PAYAWAL 177 SCRA 72
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1989/aug1989/gr_84811_1989.html
- CHRISTIAN GENERAL ASSEMBLY, INC. V. IGNACIO
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/aug2009/gr_164789_2009.html
7. MEMORIZE!! Criticisms against Admin Actions (6)
Case:
- ANG TIBAY V. THE COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS and NATIONAL LABOR UNION,
INC.
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1940/feb1940/gr_l-46496_1940.html
8. Diff. Advantages of Admin Process (vis a vis Court Process or Court Proceeding)
Case: Lianga Bay Logging v. Lopez
--> Paki-comment naman yung exact case na binigay ni Sir
eto lang nakuha ko: G.R. L-30367 July 16, 1987 (?)

ADMIN LAW
HW#2

DE LEON -CHAPTER 2
1. Nature and Org of Admin Agencies
2. Definition of Admin Agency
3. Coverage of Admin Agency
4. Diff types of Admin Bodies
5. Organization of Admin Bodies
6. 3 Ways of Admin Organization
-creation
-re-organization
-end/ abolished
**define and give example for each
7. How are admin bodies created?
8. How are admin bodies abolished?
9. Purposes of reorganization
10. Limitations of reorganization
CASES:
1. LARIN VS. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY G.R. No. 112745 October 16, 1997
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1997/oct1997/gr_112745_1997.html
2. DARIO V. MISON (consolidated cases)
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1989/aug1989/gr_81954_1989.html
3. BUKLOD NG KAWANI EIIB V. ZAMORA G.R. Nos. 142801-802 July 10, 2001
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2001/jul2001/gr_142801_2001.html
4. BAGAOISAN V. NATL. TOBACCO ADMINISTRATION G.R. No. 152845 August 5, 2003
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2003/aug2003/gr_152845_2003.html
5. CRISOSTOMO V. CA G.R. No. 10629 July 5, 1996
[PLEASE CHECK IF THIS IS THE RIGHT CASE]
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1996/jul1996/gr_106296_1996.html


ADMIN LAW HW#3
Due on: December 9
ALL 17 DIGESTS TO PASS ON MONDAY
Same format. Don't forget to add a table of contents + page number!
CHAPTER 3
I Function v. Power
II Sources of Functions & Powers
III Scope of Powers
CASE 1: MAKATI STOCK EXCHANGE V. SEC G.R. No. L-23004 June 30, 1965
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1965/jun1965/gr_l-23004_1965.html
2: TAULE V. SANTOS G.R. No. 90336 August 12, 1991
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1991/aug1991/gr_90336_1991.html
3: SOLID HOMES INC. V. PAYAWAL G.R. No. 84811 August 29, 1989
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1989/aug1989/gr_84811_1989.html
--focus on scopes of power issue [ SEE P. 149 OF BOOK]
IV Classification of Powers
V What are Investigatory Powers
VI What are Judicial Functions
VII Judicial Discretion
VIII Test of Judicial Function
4: CARINO V. CHR G.R. No. 96681 December 2, 1991
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1991/dec1991/gr_96681_1991.html
IX Purposes of Investigatory Powers
X Scope & Extent of Investigatory Powers
5: VILLALUZ V. ZALDIVAR G.R. No. L-22754 December 31, 1965
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1965/dec1965/gr_22754_1965.html
--focus on initiation of investigation issue
XI Conduct of Investigators
6: RUIZ V. DRILON G.R. No. 101666 June 9, 1992
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1992/jun1992/gr_101666_1992.html
7: SEC OF JUSTICE V. LANTION G.R. No. 139465 January 18, 2000
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2000/jan2000/gr_139465_2000.html
8: PEFIANCO V. MORAL G.R. No. 132248 January 19, 2000
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2000/jan2000/gr_132248_2000.html
X.
9: CAMARA V. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 387 U.S.
523 (1967)
http://www.constitution.org/ussc/387-523a.htm
10: SALAZAR V. ACHACOSO G.R. No. 81510 March 14, 1990
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1990/mar1990/gr_81510_1990.html
XI. Acts, Records
11: CATURA V. CIR G.R. No. L-27392 January 30, 1971 [Pages 73-75 of book!]
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1971/jan1971/gr_27392_1971.html
XII. Attendance
12: EVANGELISTA V. JARENCIO G.R. No. L-29274 November 27, 1975 [Pages 72-73 of book!]
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1975/nov1975/gr_29274_1975.html
***XIII. Hearing
13: OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATOR VS CANQUE A.M. No. P-04-1830 June 4, 2009
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/jun2009/am_p-04-1830_2009.html
*** UPDATED!
XIV Contempt Cases
14: CARMELO V. RAMOS G.R. No. L-17778 November 30, 1962 [PLS VERIFY]
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1962/nov1962/gr_l-17778_1962.html
15: MASANGKAY V. DEL ROSARIO G.R. No. 182484 June 17, 2008 [PLS VERIFY]
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2008/jun2008/gr_182484_2008.html
16: BEDOL V. COMELEC G.R. No. 179830 December 3, 2009
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2009/dec2009/gr_179830_2009.html
17: GAOIRAN V. ALCALA G.R. No. 150178 november 26, 2004
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2004/nov2004/gr_150178_2004.html

ADMIN LAW
Assignment No. 4
RULE-MAKING POWER
1. Definition of Rule Making
-Def. Of Rules and Regulation
2. Why is Administrative agencies given such powers?
3. What is the necessity of such power?
4. Nature of the grant of rule making power.
5. Principle of Non-delegation
-basis for the rule
-Case:
KMU v Garcia (239 scra 386)
6. 3 issues on rule making power
-permissibility of delegation
-validity of delegation
-validity of exercise (whether the regulation issues conform with what the law provides)
-five (5) instances of permissible delegation
7. Memorize:
Section 28, par. 2, Art. VI of the Constitution
Section 23, par. 2, Art. VI
Section 2, Art. XVII
Section 3, Art. X
8. Cases:
A. Permissibility of Delegation
-Santiago v Comelec 270 scra 106
-Phil Assoc of Service Exporters v Torres 212 SCRA 298
B. Validity of delegation
-US v Ang Tang Ho GR No. 17122, Feb 27, 1992
-Ynot v IAC 148 SCRA 659
C. Validity of the exercise of rule-making power
-Dept. Of Agrarian Reform v Sutton GR No. 162070, Oct. 19, 2005
-Solicitor General v MMA 204 SCRA 837
-Boie Takeda Chemicals v Dela Serna 228 SCRA 329
- Victoria's Milling Company v Social Security Commission 4 SCRA 627
-United BF Homeowner's Assoc v BF Homes, Inc 310 SCRA 305
-Lupangco v CA 160 SCRA 849

ADMIN CLASS HW TOMORROW
1. Meaning of Rules and Regulations w/Penal Provisions
2. Memorize, explain reqs for the validity
(1st 4 cases)
3. Req of Publication
(5th case)
4. On notice and Hearing
(5 cases)

1. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. MAXIMO MACEREN

2. UNITED STATES VS. ADRIANO PANLILIO

3. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. AUGUSTO SANTOS

4. SEC. VINCENT PEREZ VS. LPG REFILLERS ASSOCIATION

5. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. QUE PO LAY

6. HON. RENATO CORONA VS. UNITED HARBOR PILOTS ASOCIATION

7. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE VS. CA

8. PHILIPPINE CONSUMMERS FOUNDATION VS. SEC. OF DECS

9. JOSE LINA VS. ISIDRO CARINO

10. SEC. ERNESTO MACEDA VS. ERB
ADMIN HW FOR MONDAY 03/03
I. Quasi Judicial Power/ Adj powers
-define
-3 elements
Cases:
1. Presidential Anti-Dollar v. CA
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1989/mar1989/gr_83578_1989.html
2. Cojuangco v. PCGG
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1990/oct1990/gr_92319_20_1990.html
3. Santiago, Jr. v. Bautista
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1970/mar1970/gr_25024_1970.html
II. 3 steps to quasi-judicial power
Cases:
4. SMART v. NTC
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2003/aug2003/gr_151908_2003.html
5. Guerzon v. CA
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1988/aug1988/gr_77707_1988.html
6. Antipolo Realty v. NHA
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1987/aug1987/gr_l_50444_1987.html
III. Diff classifications of Adj powers
I. CHAPTER 5: ADMIN PROCEEDINGS

-Const., Art 8, Sec 5 (5)
-Diff characteristics of admin proceeding
-Addtl characteristics of admin proceeding

CASES:
1. BANTOLINO V. COCA COLA
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2003/jun2003/gr_153660_2003.html

2. FIRST LEPANTO CERAMICS V. CA
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1996/feb1996/gr_117680_1996.html

-Quantum of Proof
-Hierarchy of Evidentiary Values
-MEMORIZE: Reqs of Admin Process

3. VILLA V. LAZARO
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1990/aug1990/gr_l_69871_1990.html

*Read book of Justice Cruz on Admin ... (Paki-comment yung topic!)

4. PATEROK V. BUREAU OF CUSTOMS
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1991/jan1991/gr_90660_61_1991.html

5. LUMIQUED V. EXEVIA
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1997/nov1997/gr_117565_1997.html

6. CASIMIRO V. TANDOG
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2005/jun2005/gr_146137_2005.html

7. GLOBE V. NTC
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2004/jul2004/gr_143964_2004.html

8. SUNTAY V. PEOPLE 101 PHIL 770 **di ako sure dito
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1957/jun1957/gr_l-9430_1957.html

9. RCPI V. NTC
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1990/apr1990/gr_l_66683_1990.html

10. MANILA INTL AIRPORT AUTHORITY V. BLANCAFLOR
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2004/dec2004/gr_157581_2004.html

II. CHAPTER 6: JUDICIAL REVIEW
-Reqs for Admin Revisions

11. NICOS INDUSTRIAL CORP V. CA
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1992/feb1992/gr_88709_1992.html

* GET DEFINITIONS:
-PRIOR RESORT
-EXHAUSTION OF ADMIN REMEDIES
-RIPENESS FOR REVIEW

12. VILLAFLOR V. CA
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1997/oct1997/gr_95694_1997.html

13. LAGUNA CATV NETWORK INC V. MARAAN
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2002/nov2002/gr_139492_2002.html

14. CORPUS V. CUADERNO
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1962/mar1962/gr_l-17860_1962.html

15. MADRIGAL V. LECAROZ
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1990/oct1990/gr_l_46218_1990.html

16. TAN V. VETERANS BACKPAY COMMISSION
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1959/mar1959/gr_l-12944_1959.html

17. UP BOARD OF REGENTS V. RASUL
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1991/aug1991/gr_91551_1991.html

18. NFA V. CA
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1996/feb1996/gr_115121_1996.html

19. GRAVADOR V. MAMIGO
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1967/jul1967/gr_l-24989_1967.html

20. ALMINE V. CA
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1989/sep1989/gr_80719_1989.html

21. DATILES V. SUCALDITO
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1990/jun1990/gr_l_42380_1990.html

22. ARROW TRANSPORTATION CORP V. BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1975/mar1975/gr_39655_1975.html

23. AZUR V. PROVINCIAL BOARD
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1969/feb1969/gr_l-22333_1969.html

24. CABADA V. ALUNAN
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1996/aug1996/gr_119645_1996.html

25. SMART V. NTC
http://www.lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2003/aug2003/gr_151908_2003.html