P. 1
Ibn Umar [ra] said Ya Muhammad [Saw] (O Muhammad ) in Distress, Sahih hadith by Imam Bukhari [Rah] Hadith

Ibn Umar [ra] said Ya Muhammad [Saw] (O Muhammad ) in Distress, Sahih hadith by Imam Bukhari [Rah] Hadith

|Views: 403|Likes:
منشور بواسطةsunnimuslim
ya muhammad o prophet o rasool allah ya rasool allah bukhari tawassul istagnatha Allah islam sahih hadith saheeh intercession wasila asking dead authentic
ya muhammad o prophet o rasool allah ya rasool allah bukhari tawassul istagnatha Allah islam sahih hadith saheeh intercession wasila asking dead authentic

More info:

Published by: sunnimuslim on Dec 09, 2009
حقوق الطبع:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/14/2010

pdf

text

original

Now on this hadith some ignorants claim thats it

Weak although Imam Bukhari [rah] recorded it in chapter of when leg becomes numb
,
They usually criticize two narrators, Ibn Ishaq and Imam Sufan ath!"hawri #rah$
,
They say
,
in some makhtoot of adab wal mufrad and narrations the word YA does’nt exist
only Muhammad exist
see this
للل : للللل للل لللل للل : للللل للللل لل للل للللل لل للل لللللل لل للل للل :
لللل للل للل لللل لللل لل للل : لللل للل للللل لللل لللل : لللل .
Here only Muhammad Exist
للللل لللللل ) " 9! ) "uskha of misar and its e#en not in the nuskha of san$la hill india
%ndly
abu ishaa& in the 'hain is mudallis and he is narratin$ from (un)
abu isha& is mudallis (tab&at ul mudalliseen)
and if mudallis narrate from (un) then he is not a''e)table
للل للل لللل : للل للل للل للللل للللل لللل .
*bn e moieen said ibn e uyuniya said ta$haiyur ka shikar ho $ya tha
Refuting Forgery that Ya Muhammad [saw] is not present
,
. In the printed edition of the %dab al!&ufrad b Samir al!'uhari #who utilised al!%lbani(s
gradings from his edition$ it does have the “Ya” included.
The “Ya” Muhammad portion is also found in the Arabic text of the Enlish printed edition by Yusuf
Talal !e"oren#o $p. %&%, no. '()* + but he left the )*a+ untranslated
,
Another narration ,ith “ *a &uhammad+ in its ,ordin is also recorded by i* Ali ibn al -a.d in his
Musnad $ no, -./0, see also "ahdhib al!1amal of al!&izzi and "abaqat ibn Sa(d below * as
follo,s/
,
هبو نع يبأ قاحسإ ، نع دبع نمحرلا نب دعس لاق : تنك دنع دبع لا نب رمع تردخ ه!"ر ت!# هل : ا$ ابأ دبع نمحرلا ، ا% &!"رل ' لاق " : (م)"ا
ا*ب+ع ن% ان,ا, ، ت!ق : -.ا /حأ 0انلا &1لإ ، لاق : ا$ دمح% ، ت23ب4ا
,
ii* Ibn al01unni in his Amal ,al yaum ,al "ayla $no. &)&*/
ي4رب5أ دمحأ نب ن3حلا ي6+لا ، ان7دح ي!ع نب دع8لا ، ان7 ر1,9 ، نع يبأ قاحسإ ، نع دبع نمحرلا نب دعس ، لاق " : تنك دنع نبا رمع ، تردخ
ه!"ر ، ت!# : ا$ ابأ دبع نمحرلا ، ا% &!"رل ' لاق : (م)"ا ا*ب+ع ن% ان,ا, . ت!ق : -.ا /حأ 0انلا &1لإ . لا# : ا$ دمح% . ت23ب4ا 2
This clearly sho, that some roups are doing forger scanned page
,
The first 2 routes ,hich are in number 345 and 340 are ,ea3er in the sanad than that of al04u3hari.s
Adab al0Mufrad but for Asim all of these variations pro6ed that the wording )*a &uhammad+ was
used, Allah o a3bar
,
In the 7 chains presented to date, all of them contain Abu Isha5 al01abii and he has narrated to %
different students/
► 1ufyan $as in Adab al0Mufrad and Ibn 1a.d.s Taba5at*
► 6uhayr ibn Mu.a,iya $as in Taba5at of Ibn 1a.d*
►Isra.il ibn Yunus $as in Ibn al 1unni*
►Abu 4a3r ibn Ayyash $as in ibn al01unni*
,
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
,
8efuting from Ibn "amiah on *a &uhammad #saw$ issue
,
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
Asim7s shei3h ul islam Ibn Taymiyya also mention one 6ersion of it in his short ,or3 called 8alim al0
Tayyib and his student the 9afi# of hadith in his ae + al0Mi##i also mentioned it in his Tahdhib al0
8amal ,ith his sanad as mentioned earlier.
,
Note that /Ibn Taymiyya or Al mi##i did not attac3 the story or its implications, let alone ob:ect to the
Isnad.s authenticity.
,
What Ibn tamiah mentioned
,
:+ ي :"رلا ا;إ ترد5
-/4 نع <=1*لا نب >نح لاق 9
انك دنع دبع لا نب رمع ي?ر لا ام*نع تردخ ه!"ر لا# هل :"ر : رك;ا /حأ 0انلا &1لإ لا# : اا اااا ام4@A BC4 ن% لا#ع ,
,
;version from Ibn al01unni $no. &('*, Ibn "amia mentioned in his 1alim al!"aeb <
Refuting Stupid claim on Abu Ishaq !arrator of Sahih "u#hari and Sahih Muslim
,
There is no proof that 6uhayr transmitted from Abu Isha5 any confused ,ordins here as he is also
supported by one of the t,o 1ufyan.s ,ith identical ,ordin.
Also, this route of 6uhayr from %bu Ishaq is in Sahih al!Bukhari and &uslim,
More proofs on Authenticity of $YA Muhammad
word$ now refuting on authenticit of 2*%2 &uhammad matn
,
Ibn 9a:ar deduced from Ibn 9ibban and =asa.i.s ta,thi5 in his Ta5rib al0Tahdhib/
[ /:55 ] دبع نمحرلا نب دعس يDر#لا Eل6% نب رمع ي6ك ه#7و يFا3نلا ن% G=لا=لا Hب
,
the narration in al04u3hari.s Adab al0Mufrad $similar sanad in Taba5at ibn 1a.d* appears to be
Sahih, and its matn has come in close ,ordin via other routes ,hich contain some forms of
,ea3ness as recorded by Ibn al01unni in hisAmal ,al Yaum ,al "ayla as follo,s/
,
No, 345
ين7دح دمح% نب <1,اربإ يIام4Jا ، ورمعو نب د1ن8لا نب E31ع ، Kاق : ان7 دمح% نب Lاد5 ، ان7 6بأ رAب نب Lا1ع ، ان7 6بأ قاحسإ يع1ب3لا ، نع يبأ
GبعD ، لاق : تنك يC%أ (% نبا رمع ي?ر لا ام*نع ، تردخ ه!"ر ، M!8 ، لا# هل :"ر : رك;ا /حأ 0انلا &1لإ . لا# : " ا$ دمح% Nا Oا# ECم
=umber &('
ان7دح دمح% نب دلا5 نب دمح% يع;ربلا ، ان7 /"اح نب Pام1!س ، دمح%ان7 نب /ع+% ، ان7 :1Fارسإ ، نع يبأ قاحسإ ، نع <=1*لا نب >نح ، لاق : انك دنع
دبع لا نب رمع ي?ر لا ام*نع ، تردخ ه!"ر ، لا# هل :"ر " : رك;ا /حأ 0انلا &1لإ . لا# : ا$ دمح% E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو . لاق : Oا# ام4@A BC4
ن% لا#ع
.
=o. &)&
ي4رب5أ دمحأ نب ن3حلا ي6+لا ، ان7دح ي!ع نب دع8لا ، ان7 ر1,9 ، نع يبأ قاحسإ ، نع دبع نمحرلا نب دعس ، لاق " : تنك دنع نبا رمع ، تردخ
ه!"ر ، ت!# : ا$ ابأ دبع نمحرلا ، ا% &!"رل ' لاق : (م)"ا ا*ب+ع ن% ان,ا, . ت!ق : -.ا /حأ 0انلا &1لإ . لا# % اي دمحم & تطسبناف >
The Taba5at of ibn 1ad $number %))(* also mentions it as pointed out earlier/
لاق : ا4رب5أ :RSلا نب ن1ك. ، لاق : ان7دح Pا1Sس ، ر1,9و نب G$واع% ، نع يبأ قاحسإ ، نع دبع نمحرلا نب دعس ، لاق : تنك دنع نبا رمع تردخ ه!"ر
, ت!# : ا$ ابأ دبع نمحرلا ا% &!"رل ' لاق : (م)"ا ا*ب+ع ن% ان,ا, - اT, ي U$دح ر1,9 Nدحو - لاق : ت!ق : -.ا /حأ 0انلا &1لإ , اق ل : ا$ دمح% ،
ا*23ب
Accordin to this loic e6en hadiths of Sahih bukhari and Sahih muslim should be Weak ,
Except Albani shahib no one has the Art to declare 4u3hari and Muslim !aeef /!
,
Refuting Stupid claim on Abu Ishaq !arrator of
Sahih "u#hari and Sahih Muslim
,
;<amples9
In Sahih al!Bukhari9
V1حQ ،Wراخبلا XY8لا ي4ا=لا << 60 - Zا)ك .ا*8لا ر13لاو << 96 - Zاب : ن% [Q هباحQأ دنع ،Gم$Y*لا لY4و نع ه)با. ر+ن)ساو ,
-55- ! ان7دح ورمع نب دلا5 : ان7دح ر1,9 : ااااا ااا ااااا لاق : تعمس Xاربلا هل@سو :"ر 9
<)نكأ <\رر ا$ ابأ ]رامع O6$ 'ن1نح لاق : K ،لاو ا% Eلو ل6سر لا E!Q لا ه1!ع ،<!سو هنAلو ^ر5 PابD هباحQأ <,_اS5أو ار3ح M1ل ،`a3ب ا6\@ ا%6ق
،]ا%ر (م" P9ا6, ينبو ،ر+4 ا% .اA$ B#3$ <*ل ،<*س <,6#Dر ا#Dر ا% Pو.اA$ ،P6b2خ$ ا6!بق@ &لان, Eلإ يبنلا E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو 6,و E!ع ه)!cب
،XاR1بلا نباو همع 6بأ Pا1Sس نب dراحلا نب دبع /!2ملا .6#$ ،هب لYن ،ر+ن)ساو <7 لاق ) : ا4أ يبنلا K ،ZTك ا4أ نبا دبع /!2ملا .( <7 [Q هباحQأ
,
, again from Sahih bukhari
,
/730 ! ان7دح دمح% نب [س6$ : ان7دح دمحأ نب د$9 نب ،<1,اربإ 6بأ ن3حلا ي4اYحلا : ان7دح ر1,9 نب G$واع% : ااااا ااا ااااا : تعمس
Xاربلا نبا Z9اع ل6#$ 9
Xا" 6بأ رAب ي?ر لا هنع Eلإ يبأ ي ،هلYن% eر)Dا هن% ،aحر لا# Z9اعل : Uعبا &نبا ه!مح$ ،يع% لاق : ه)!مح ،هع% ^ر5و يبأ د#)ن$ ،هنم7 لا# هل
يبأ : ا$ ابأ ،رAب ين7دح [1ك ام)عنQ ن1ح ت$رس (% ل6سر لا E!Q لا ه1!ع ،<!سو لاق : ،<ع4 ان$رسأ ان)!1ل ن%و ،دcلا E)ح Oاق <Fاق ]ر1*fلا a5و g$ر2لا K
رم$ ه1 ،دحأ تعر انل ]رخQ G!$6I ا*ل ،:h <ل ت@\ ه1!ع ،MمCلا انلYن ،Nدنع ت$6سو يبن!ل E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو ا4اA% Wد1ب
%rabic continues ,,,, == will not mention that
,
,
>roof from Sahih &uslim9
V1حQ <!3% ,
XY8لا لوJا << 6 - Zا)ك ]aQ ن$را3ملا ا,ر+قو ) << 2 ( Zاب ر+ق ]a+لا Eنمب
-3 ! #404$ ان7دح دمحأ نب لادبع نب M46$ . ان7دح ر1,9 . ااااا ااا ااااا . ين7دح G7راح نب /,و iيعاYخلا لاق 9
ت1!Q [!5 ل6سر لا E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو ،Eنمب 0انلاو ر=كأ ا% ،ا64اك E!+ ن1)عكر ي G8ح -ا.6لا ,
# لاق <!3% :( G7راح نب /,و ،يعاYخلا 6, 65أ لاد1بع نب رمع نب ،Zا2خلا ه%J
Refuting Stupid claim on Abu Ishaq !arrator of
Sahih "u#hari and Sahih Muslim
,
,Isra.il is the randson of Abu Isha5 al01abii and ibn ?a@ar said in al!"aqreeb al!"ahdhib about
him9
[ 7A3 ] :1Fارسإ نب M46$ نب يبأ قاحسإ يع1ب3لا ي4ادم*لا 6بأ [س6$ ي6Aلا G#7 <!A\ ه1 aب G8ح ن% Gعبا3لا تا% Gنس ن1)س :1قو ا,دعب -
?e is thus "hiqa thouh some spo3e about him ,ithout any 9u::a and his narrations are in the 1ihah
1itta also. ?ne can find Isra.il.s narrations from Abu Isha5 in Sahih al!Bukhari and
&uslim,;<amples from Sahih al!Bukhari9
,
=ote, in these examples the narrator + Abu Isha5 al01abi.i also reported from his 1hay3h via use
of an0ana. ;<amples from Sahih bukhari
,
XY8لا لوJا << 3 - Zا)ك <!علا << . 48 - Zاب : ن% jر\ kعب ،را1)5Kا Gاخ% Pأ ر+#$ <* kعب 0انلا ،هنع ا6ع#1 ي دDأ هن% ,
3-4 ! ان7دح د1بع لا نب ،Eس6% نع :1Fارسإ ، اا ااا ااااا ، نع .6سJا لاق : لاق يل نبا ر1بYلا 9
ت4اك GCFاع ر3\ &1لإ ،ار1=ك ام &)7دح ي 'GبعAلا ت!ق : تلاق يل : لاق يبنلا E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو ) : ا$ GCFاع K6ل &%6ق U$دح <,د*ع - لاق نبا ر1بYلا -
،رSAب تR#نل ،GبعAلا ت!ع8 ا*ل ن1باب : Zاب :5د$ 0انلا Zابو P6"رخ$ .( ه!عS نبا ر1بYلا ,
#/573$ ! ان7دح دبع لا نب Xا"ر : ان7دح :1Fارسإ ، اا ااا ااااا ، نع Xاربلا لاق : انك ZاحQأ دمح% E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو dدح)4 9
Pأ ]دع ZاحQأ ردب E!ع ]دع ZاحQأ ت6لاI ن$Tلا او9وا" هع% ،ر*نلا <لو 9وا8$ هع% Kإ ،ن%l% GعRب رCع GFام7a7و ,
#//.-$ ! ان7دح دبع لا نب Xا"ر : ان7دح :1Fارسإ ، اا ااا ااااا ، نع /,و يبأ GS1ح" يFا63لا لاق 9
ت$أر يبنلا E!Q لا ه1!ع ،<!سو ت$أرو ا?ا1ب ن% تح\ ه)SD ،E!S3لا G#Sنعلا
e<ample of ;<ample in Sahih &uslim9
V1حQ <!3% . XY8لا (بارلا << . 53 - Zا)ك د,Yلا gFاقرلاو << 19 - Zاب ي U$دح ]ر8*لا . لا#$و هل : U$دح :حرلا
5.! O ) - 2009 ( ه1ن7دحو ر1,9 نب Zرح . ان7دح Pام=ع نب رمع . ` Nان7دحو قاحسإ نب <1,اربإ . ا4رب5أ رRنلا نب :1مD . ام,aك نع :1Fارسإ ، نع يبأ
قاحسإ ، نع ءاربلا & لاق /
للللل للل للل لل للل لللل لللللل للل للللل . لللل لللللل . للللل لللل لللل لل للل
للللل . لللل لل لللللل لل للللل للللل لل للل : لللل للل للل لللل لللل لللل للل
لللل لللل لللل . لللل لللل لل للللل للل لللل . لللل للل . لللل : لل لللل ! لل لللل لل
للل لللل . لللل لللل لل لللللل للل للل للل . للل للل لللللل للل لل للللل . لللل
لللللل . للل لللل لللل . لللل لللل للل لللل للللللل للللل للل لللل . للل لللل
للللل . للل " لل لللل لل لل لللل " لللللل للللللل لللل . لللللللل لللل لللل لللل
لللل لللل للل لللل لللل لللل . لللل " لللل للل للل للللللل للللل لللللللللل
لللللل لللل " لللل لللللل للللللل للل لللللل . للللل للللللل لللللل لل للللل .
لللللل : لل لللل ! لل لللل لللل ! لل لللل ! لل لللل لللل
,
Ibn ?a@ar said in al!"aqreeb al!"ahdhib about %bu Ishaq9
[ .A4. ] ورمع نب دبع لا نب د1بع لا#$و ي!ع لا#$و نب يبأ ]ر1عD ي4ادم*لا 6بأ قاحسإ يع1ب3لا V)Sب G!م*ملا ر3كو ]دح6ملا G#7 ر=A% دباع ن%
G=لا=لا B!)5ا ]ر5@ب تا% Gنس (3\ ن$رCعو GFا%و :1قو :بق &ل; -
,
"his shows that %bu Ishaq is "hiqa, his narrations are in the 1ihah 1itta thouh he deteriorated in
memory at the end of his days.
,
although there is no proof that this hadith was transmitted when memor loss was going
on , A useless -irrah on imams as usual as people do :ust to support their a5eeda
,
"he notice abo6e from the "ahdhib al!"ahdhib mentions that amongst those who took from
%bu Ishaq include9
+ufyan al,-hawri
+ufyan ibn .yayna
*sra’il ibn Yunus
/uhayr ibn Mu’awiya
% Bahil ob@ecting on Sahih bukhari b making 2an!ana2 issue here
,
1ome -ahil ob:ected that Abu Isha5 al01abi.i ,as a Mudallis and ,hen ever he used an0ana from the
1hay3h he claimed to report from his narrations are not acceptable.
,
Indeed, there does not seem to be an proof that an0ana utilised by Abu Isha5 leads to an
automatic illa $hidden defect in the sanad* bein raised for every sinle chain he used an0ana to
transmit his narrations for.
,
so there is no specific proof that any hadith scholar accused Abu Isha5 of committin tadlees ,hen
reportin from the next narrator $Abdar @ahman ibn 1a.d* as in al!Bukhari(s 6ersion from the
%dab al!&ufrad,
@ather, there are a number of e<amples where %bu Ishaq used an!ana to transmit from the
ne<t narrator in the sanad in Sahih al!Bukhari and Sahih &uslim, Allah o A3bar,
,
;<amples of %bu Ishaq performing an!ana from a Shakh in Sahih al!Bukhari
See how Imam al!Bukhari also accepted some narrations where one of the two Sufan(s
transmitted from %bu Ishaq b an!ana and then %bu Ishaq did an!ana when reporting from
his Shakh
,,
;<ample of Sahih Bukhari refuting fabricated claim
,
، XY8لا لوJا << 2 - Zا)ك Pام$mا << . 29 - Zاب : ]a+لا ن% Pام$mا ,
7A ! ان7دح ورمع نب دلا5 لاق : ان7دح ر1,9 لاق : ان7دح 6بأ ،قاحسإ نع ،Xاربلا Pأ يبنلا E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو 9
Pاك لوأ ا% Oدق Gن$دملا لY4 E!ع ،N.اد"أ وأ لاق هلا65أ ن% ،را+4Jا ه4أو E!Q :بق ت1ب 0د#ملا G)س رCع ،ار*D وأ Gعبس ،ار*D Pاكو هب8ع$ Pأ P6A\
ه)!بق :بق ،ت1بلا ه4أو E!Q لوأ ]aQ ا,aQ
;<amples of %bu Ishaq performing an!ana from a Shakh in Sahih al!Bukhari
See how Imam al!Bukhari also accepted some narrations where one of the two Sufan(s
transmitted from %bu Ishaq b an!ana and then %bu Ishaq did an!ana when reporting from
his Shakh
, ;<ample of Sahih bukhari
,
XY8لا ي4ا=لا << 59 - Zا)ك ا$اQ6لا << . 1 - Zاب : ،ا$اQ6لا ل6قو يبنلا E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو ) : G1Qو :"رلا Gب6)A% Nدنع $
-.:: ! ان7دح <1,اربإ نب dراحلا : ان7دح E1ح$ نب يبأ ر1Aب : ان7دح ر1,9 نب G$واع% يSع8لا : ان7دح 6بأ ،قاحسإ نع ورمع نب dراحلا ،
ن)5 ل6سر لا E!Q لا ه1!ع ،<!سو ي5أ G$ر$6" تنب ،dراحلا لاق : ا% jر\ ل6سر لا E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو دنع ه\6% ،ام,ر. Kو ،اران$. Kو ،ادبع Kو
،G%أ Kو ،اb1D Kإ ه)!cب ،XاR1بلا ،هحaسو ا?رأو ا*!ع" GقدQ ,
,
%nother e<ample from Bukhari refuting %sim
,
XY8لا ي4ا=لا << 60 - Zا)ك .ا*8لا ر13لاو << 32 - Zاب : رب+لا دنع لا)#لا ,
-45: ! ان7دح دبع لا نب دمح% : ان7دح G$واع% نب ورمع : ان7دح 6بأ ،قاحسإ نع Eس6% نب ،Gب#ع نع <لاس يبأ رRنلا : Pأ دبع لا نب يبأ Eوأ ،/)ك
ه\أر#9
Pإ ل6سر لا E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو لاق ) : ا;إ <,6م)1#ل اوربQا $,
%nother e<ample from Bukhari refuting on an!ana issue
,
,
XY8لا ي4ا=لا << 60 - Zا)ك .ا*8لا ر13لاو << 85 - Zاب : ن% <ل ر$ ر3ك `a3لا دنع ت6ملا ,
-5.. ! ان7دح ورمع نب 0ابع : ان7دح دبع ،نمحرلا نع Pا1Sس ، نع يبأ قاحسإ ، نع ورمع نب dراحلا لاق 9
ا% jر\ يبنلا E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو Kإ ،هحaس G!cبو ،XاR1ب ا?رأو ا*!ع" GقدQ ,
ne<t
,
V1حQ ،Wراخبلا XY8لا ي4ا=لا << 60 - Zا)ك .ا*8لا ر13لاو << 97 - Zاب : Xاعدلا E!ع ن1كرCملا Gم$Y*لاب GلYلYلاو ,
-554 ! ان7دح دبع لا نب يبأ Gب1D : ان7دح رSع" نب P6ع : ان7دح Pا1Sس ، نع يبأ قاحسإ ، نع ورمع نب ،P6م1% نع دبع لا ي?ر لا
هنع لاق 9
Pاك يبنلا E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو ي!+$ ي :h ،GبعAلا لا# 6بأ :*" 0ا4و ن% ،>$رق ترح4و روY" G1حانب ،GA% ا6!سر@ او_ا8 ن% ا,aس N6حرIو ،ه1!ع
تXا8 GمIا ه)#ل@ ،هنع لا# ) : <*!لا &1!ع ،>$ر#ب <*!لا &1!ع ،>$ر#ب <*!لا &1!ع >$ر#ب .( يبJ :*" نب ،OاC, Gب)عو نب ،Gع1بر Gب1Dو نب ،Gع1بر
د1ل6لاو نب ،Gب)ع يبأو نب ،[!5 Gب#عو نب يبأ B1ع% . لاق دبع لا : د#! <*)$أر ي /1!ق ردب E!)ق . لاق 6بأ قاحسإ : ت134و (با3لا . لاقو [س6$ نب
،قاحسإ نع يبأ قاحسإ : G1%أ نب [!5 . لاقو GبعD : G1%أ وأ يبأ . V1ح+لاو G1%أ ,
ne<t
V1حQ Wراخبلا
XY8لا ي4ا=لا << 66 - Zا)ك :FاR Gباح+لا << 56 - Zاب : Oا$أ G1!,ا8لا ,
/4-4 ! ين7دح ورمع نب 0ابع : ان7دح دبع نمحرلا : ان7دح ،Pا1Sس نع يبأ ،قاحسإ نع ورمع نب P6م1% لاق 9
لاق رمع ي?ر لا هنع : Pإ ن1كرCملا ا64اك K P6R1S$ ن% (م" E)ح قرC\ MمCلا E!ع ،ر1ب7 <*Sلاخ يبنلا E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو nا@ :بق Pأ (!2\
MمCلا,
;<amples in Sahih &uslim ,here 6uhayr or 1ufyan reported b an!ana from %bu Ishaq and
then Abu Isha5 reportin ,ith an0ana from his 1hay3h
,
Sahih muslim refutes Bahils claim
,
XY8لا ي4ا=لا << 12 - Zا)ك ]اكYلا ) << . 20 ( Zاب Uحلا E!ع Gقد+لا 6لو gCب ]رم\ وأ Gم!ك ،Gب1I ا*4أو Zا8ح ن% رانلا
44! #3A34$ ان7دح P6ع نب Oaس ي6Aلا . ان7دح ر1,9 نب G$واع% يSع8لا نع يبأ ،قاحسإ لادبعنع نب ،:#ع% نع Wدع نب <\اح i لاق : تعمس يبنلا
E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو ل6#$ 9
2 ن% -ا2)سا <Aن% Pأ ر))3$ ن% رانلا 6لو gCب ،]رم\ :عS1! 2,
[ L ) gCب ( gCلا ر3Aب ،ن1Cلا ا*S+4 ا*ب4ا"و ],
V1حQ <!3% . XY8لا Uلا=لا << 32 - Zا)ك .ا*8لا ر13لاو << 49 - Zاب .دع تاوYo يبنلا E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو
377 ! #3-.7$ ان7دحو 6بأ رAب نب يبأ Gب1D . ان7دح E1ح$ نب O.p . ان7دح ر1,9 نع يبأ ،قاحسإ نع د$9 نب ،<قرأ هعمس iهن%
Pأ ل6سر لا E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو اYo (3\ ]رCع ]وYo . qحو دعب ا% ر"ا, G8ح <ل qح$ ا,ر1o . G8ح -ا.6لا
V1حQ <!3% . XY8لا (بارلا << . 44 - Zا)ك :FاR Gباح+لا ي?ر لا Eلاع\ <*نع << 1 - Zاب ن% :FاR يبأ رAب ،g$د+لا ي?ر لا هنع
. ! #-/:/$ ان7دح دمح% نب Eن=ملا نباو راCب Kاق : ان7دح نمحرلادبع . ين7دح Pا1Sس نع يبأ ،قاحسإ نع يبأ ،r6حJا نع لادبع . ` ان7دحو دبع نب
د1مح . ا4رب5أ رSع" نب P6ع . ا4رب5أ 6بأ M1مع نع نبا يبأ ،GA1!% نع لادبع . لاق 9
لاق ل6سر لا E!Q لا ه1!ع <!سو " 6ل تنك اTخ)% a1!5 تTخ\K نبا يبأ Gاحق a1!5 2,
,
ConDt ask for more proofs from Bukhari or &uslim on an!ana issue, I can show alot more
but am tired
,
another pro6e from Sahih muslim refuting Bahil on %n!ana
,
ءزجلا عبارلا '' & () * باتك ركذلا ءاعدلا !ب"تلا #ا$%ت&'ا '' +) * باب (")تلا نم ر* ام ،+مع نم ر* ام ,ل +م)ي
)20 - , * -.-+ / ا./د0 نبا 1.2ملا نبا #ا3ب & 'اق % ا./د0 نم0رلادبع نع ،4ا5$& نع 6ب7 8اح&9 ، اذ:ب ،;ا.&<ا =>2م & ر5? 47 نبا 1.2ملا لاق 6ف =تيا#
$ !$)لا >.
,
-ahil should note that the last narrator in the sanad of al04u3hari.s Adab al0Mufrad is Abdar @ahman
ibn 1a.d ,ho ,as a free slave of Ibn Amar $ra* based in 8ufa.
,
In the "ahdhib al1amal of al &izzi #6olume number 35$ under his bioraphy the very narration
under analysis is mentioned via the route of Ali ibn al0-a.d from 6uhayr from Abu Isha5, as ,ell as
mentionin that it is also from the route of %bu Nu(am from Sufan from %bu Ishaq as is found
in %dab al!&ufrad of al!Bukhari in an abridged form,
,
let me sho, the -ahil ,hat Al0Mi##i mentioned/
,
; BCB2 < Aب دبع نم0رلا نب د)& 6*رBلا Cد)لا 1ل"م نب رمع 6ف"ك D# نع =5E7 دبع Fا نب د)& G'"م دبع Fا نب رمع Aب D# =.ع ;ام0 نب 6ب7
4ام5>& "ب7 !ب5* دبع نم0رلا نب 8اح&9 6ف"Hلا #"I.م نب رمت)ملا "ب7 8اح&9 6)5بسلا Aب Gرك( نب 4اب0 6ف باتك JاB2لا D# =ل C#اKبلا 6ف باتك ب;Lا
ا2يد0 اد0ا اف"ق"م دق عق ا.ل ا5لاع =.ع انربE7 =ب "ب7 نسحلا نب C#اKبلا M.يN ت.ب 6Hم 'اق انربE7 "ب7 O$0 نب ;NربP لاق انربE7 Qفاحلا "ب7 Jاكربلا
6PامنLا لاق انربE7 "ب7 دمحم 6.5$يرIلا لاق انربE7 "ب7 ,&اBلا نب !باب0 لاق انربE7 دبع Fا نب دمحم C"%بلا لاق ا./د0 6>ع نب د)جلا لاق انربE7 ر5RN نع 6ب7
8اح&9 نع دبع نم0رلا نب د)& لاق ت.ك د.ع دبع Fا نب رمع J#دKف =>S# ت>Bف =ل اي اب7 دبع نم0رلا ام T>Sرل لاق عمتSا ا:بIع نم اR ا.R لاق ت>ق U;ا M07
Vا.لا T5ل9 لاBف اي دمحم تطسبناف Gا# نع 6ب7 ,5)ن نع 4ا5$& نع 6ب7 8اح&9 ارIتKم
Ibn 9a:ar mentioned the about Abdar @ahman ibn 1a.d in his Tahdhib al0Tahdhib $vol. (. that
%bdar 8ahman ibn Sa(d is "hiqa as Ibn 9a:ar deduced from Ibn 9ibban and =asa.i.s ta,thi5 in his
Ta5rib al0Tahdhib/
;nds %bu Ishaq [ra] Issue,
Replying the Jahil on Sufyan Thawri [rah]
,
reardin 1ufyan Tha,ri as mudalis as he calls him every,here
lets see what Wahabi scholars [our ulemas] say about it
,
wahabi scholars themsel6es accepted themselves accept ahadith with 2EN2 of &udaliseen to
suit their desires
,
*aha Fondal6i writes9
4ا5$& D#"2لا -'ا #":3ملا =5B$لا دبا)لا Qفاحلا ر5بHلا =$W 1Xاس.لا ر5? Y5لدتلاب لاق D#اKبلا ام +قا =س5لدZ
Imam Sufan ath!"hawri #rah$ was a famous Da5ih, Aabid , “9afidh ul08abeer” Imam Nasai and
others said/ that he ,as Mudalis but Imam Bukhari said9 ?is "adlees is )G;8* HI""H;+
,
Imam al!?afidh Ibn ?a@r al %sqalani #rah$ has classified Mudaliseen into E cateories and he has
kept Sufan "hawri #rah$ in the second categor and he has himself clarified about 2nd cateory
of Mudaliseen, he said/
,
!5نا2لا نم +مت0ا !مX'ا Y5لدZ =لا"SرEا 1ف [5حIلا =تمام' !>ق =س5لدZ 1ف M.S D#ام D#"2لاك 4اكا Yلدي' نع'ا =B/ نباك =.55ع
The second cateory of Mudaliseen have been )%II;>";C B* SI?JH%8S %S "?;I8 %?%CI"?
%8; "%1;N IN I%";FJ8* JK S%?I? B;I%ES; JK "?;I8 HI""H; "%CH;;S, KJ8 ;L%&>H;
SEK*%N "?%W8I #8%?$+
In this cateory the narrators have done tadlees from )"?IM%+ narrators :ust li3e Imam Ibn
Ayaynah $rah* did.
It is clear from this Asooli discussion made by Imam Ibn ?a@r al %sqalani #rah$ that Sufan
"hawri was &udalis but his "adlees was )NJ" ?%8&KEH W?II? WJEHC ;KK;I" "?;
I8;CIBIHI"* JK ?%CI"?+ so the 9adith cannot be re:ected because of this Tadlis
!;nd Muote N [Krom Wahabi 8eference *aha Fondal6i in %ameen bil Bahr, >age No, -.!
-4]
,
same applies to Abu Ishaa5
Replying the 0ahil on Sufyan 1hawri
[rah]
,
Sheikh ul Islam Imam Ibn ?a@r al %sqalani #rah* beautifully clarifies about this )%meer ul
momineen fil hadith Sufan "hawri #rah$+9
,
ام ءا*ا \اK5* 8]Pا ^يرKZ باحWا [5حIلا !$Xاطل ,:.م _50 +)S ,:.م امسق +مت0ا !مX'ا =س5لدZ "SرE =لا 1ف [5حIلا ' =تمام !>ق =س5لدZ 1ف M.S
D#ام D#"2لاك لزتي 1>ع ازR امسي' دق +)S نم ازR ,سBلا نم 4اك ' Yلدي 'ا نع !B/ اك نب !5.5ع
,/ This has been pointed out by 1hei3h $Ibn 9a:r al0As5alani* that Ashaab us01ahih have
narrated )K8J& B%&%%" JK &EC%HIS;;N+ and they have cateori#ed those Mudaliseen as those
,ho are )%II;>";C B* I&%&S JK ?%CI"?” and they have ta3en them in their 1ahih because of
their )HI""H; "%CH;;S+ in this comparison Imam Sufan "hawri should be considered,,
$i.e. e5ual and better than those narrators*” this includes those Mudaliseen ,ho did not narrate from
other than Thi5a such as Ibn Ayainah
,
[Kath al &ugheeth N Imam Sakhawi #3O355$]
,
Allama Ibn 9a#m said/ If the Mudallis is )"?IM%+ then his narration ,ith )EN%N% #EN$ IS
"J"%HH* #&E"H%MM%N$ %II;>";C+ $i.e. if he narrated from other Thi5a narrator*
, [Ibn ?azm in al!&uhalla Golume No,5, >age No, 730, %l!%hkaam #4O3/.$]
,
other,ise even Imam Mali3 is mentioned in Mudaliseen
Imam &alik was mentioned amongst &udaliseen ;Taba5at al Mudaliseen by Imam Ibn 9a:r
$&F2'*<
,
If Every =arration of EN is re:ected than S%hih Bukhari, &uslim, &alik &awtta are weak too
accordin to -ahils in Islam
Replying the 0ahil on Sufyan 1hawri
[rah]
Imam Ibn Salah #rah$ writes9
,
1ف [5حIلا امRر5? نم MتHلا `دمت)ملا نم _يد0 ازR برaلا ر52ك ادS G;اتBك ، bمع'ا ، ن5نا5$سلا ، ,53R نب ر53ب ,Rر5? ، ازR 4' Y5لدتلا Y5ل
اب.ك امنا "R برc نم -ا:ي'ا Q$>ب +متحم .
,
In the 1ahihayn there are many such ahadith $i.e. ,ith un of mudaliseen*, li3e Gatada,
Am.ash, Sufan al!"hawri, 1ufyan bin Ayaina, 9asheem bin 4asheer etcH
have narrayed. This is because )"%CH;;S IS NJ" % HI;+ rather it is a kind of Iham ,hich has to
be properly chec3ed ;Mu5ama Ibn 1alah, Iae =o. )E<
,
1hateeb Baghdadi #rah$ ,hile further explainin it said/
,
4اف 4اك اس5لدZ نع =B/ ,ل ^تحي 4ا dق"ي 1>ع e* +بق =.م ، نم 4اك Yلدي نع ر5? =B/ ,ل +بBي =.م _يدحلا اNا =>&#ا 1ت0 ل"Bي 1./د0 4]ف تم&ا ، نحن
+بBن Y5لدZ نبا =.55ع =Xارfن ، =ن' +5حي 1>ع e>م =B/ .
,"adlees is of two kinds, If Tadlis is from a )"?IM% N%88%"J8+ then there is no need to find out
more about this matter...
,
and that narration ,ill be )%II;>";C2 ho,ever if the person is Jhair Thi5a then such a hadith ,ill
not be accepted till he clarifies that ,ho has narrated the hadith $9adasna* to him or that he heard
from Dulan $1amaat*.
Ke consider Tadlees of Ibn Ayainah and people of his ,orth $1ufyan Tha,ri* as
)%II;>"%BH;+ because they narrated from &ustanad "hiqa narrators
,
;8hatib al 4ahdadi, Al08ifayah, Iae =o. B(2<
Replying the 0ahil on Sufyan 1hawri
[rah]
,
Sheikh ul Islam Imam Ibn ?a@r al!%sqalani #rah$ writes from the reference of Ibn !a5i5 al LEid
$rah*/
It is necessary to 3eep such an $e5ual* standard accordin to ,hich )Narrations with &udaliseen
in all books are accepted or narrations with &udaliseen in all books should be re@ected+ "his
distinction between Siha and ghair Siha )I%NNJ" B; C;IH%8;C %S IJ88;I"+,,,
,
one reason of this is that such a distinction could only occur ,hen 1ahib of 1ahih has Marifah of
1amaat )%NC "?IS IS NJ" >JSSIBH;+ because only con:ecture is proven, the second reason is
that there is I:ma of 1ahihayn that all ahadith in 1ahiyan are based on 1amaat other,ise A9A" A"
I:ma ,ill ather on misuidance ,hich is “Impossible” but this 3ind of I:ma )8;MEI8;S >8JJK+ and
...
“ "?IS IS G;8* CIKKIIEH" #"J >8JG;$” so this Istidlaal cannot be done that reports other than
1ahihayn are not correct ,hen they come from Mudaliseen and that it could be said that certain
hadith is Sahih on criteria of &uslim
,
[%l!Nukar Pala 1itab Ibn al!Salah N Ibn ?a@r, >age NJ, 4/.!4]
Sheikh ul Islam Ibn ?a@ar %sqalani [rah] made categories in this reard and kept Sufan
"hawri #rah$ in the second categor, he said/
,
!5نا2لا % نم ر2ك7 !مX'ا نم gارE9 =2يد0 ام9 =تمام' 7 =ن"Hل +5>ق Y5لدتلا 6ف M.S D#ام نم _يدحلا ر52Hلا 7 =ن7 4اك ' Y5لدي '9 نع !B/
نمف ازR برaلا /
,5Rاربا نب 6ب7 ديزي 6)K.لا ، +5عام&ا نب 6ب7 دلاE ، ر53ب نب رSا:ملا ، نسحلا نب 4ا"كN ، نسحلا CرIبلا ، ,Hحلا نب !5تع ، ;ام0 نب !ما&7
ايركN نب 6ب7 `دياN ، ,لا& نب 6ب7 د)جلا ، د5)& نب 6ب7 !برع ، 4ا5$& C#"2لا ، 4ا5$& نب !.55ع ، Tير* 6cاBلا ، Fادبع نب ءاطع 6Hملا ، !مرHع
نب دلاE 6مزKملا ، دمحم نب -NاE "ب7 !يا)م ريرaلا ، !مرKم نب ر5Hب ، Yن"ي نب د5بع .
,
#In second categor$ come man Imams #&uhaditheen$ ,hose ahadith have been referenced
,ith EN due to their reatness of their Imamat....
,
"heir "adlees is )G;8* HI""H;+ very little even thouh they narrated over,helmin $8atheer*
narrations from and this is because their Tadlees is al,ays from )"?IM% ” narrators.
,
"hese are the people in this categor9
,
&* Ibrahim bin Abi Ya#id al0=a3hai $rah*
2* Ismail bin Abi 8halid $rah*
B* 4asheer bin al0Maha:ir $rah*
%* Al09asan bin 6a5,an $rah*
E* Al09asan al 4asri $rah*
(* Al09a3im bin Atba $rah*
)* 9ammad bin Asama $rah*
C* 6i3rayn bin Abi 6aida $rah*
'* 1alib bin Abi al0-a.d $rah*
&M* 1aeed ibn Abi Arooba $rah*
33$ )SEK*%N %H!"?%W8I #rah$+
3-$ )SEK*%N BIN E*%I*N% #rah$+
,
&B* 1haree3 al0Gadhi
&%* Abdullah bin Ata al Ma33i
&E* A3rama bin 8halid
&(* Muhammd bin 8ha#im, Abu Mua,iya al06arar
&)* Mu3hraba Ibn 4a3eer
&C* Yunus bin Abaid
[al!Nukat Dala 1itab Ibn al!Salah ! Ibn ?a@r, >age No, 4/.!4]
. please note that even reat Tabiyeen li3e 9asan 4asri $rah*, and reat scholars li3e 1ufyan Tha,ri,
1ufyan bin Ayainah, are mentioned .
,
but Alhamdulillah Tadlees of these narrators from "hiqa narrators )IS NJ" 8;B;I";C2
conclusion
This hadith recorded by Imam 4u3hari ;rah< in Adab ul Mufrad is Sahih according to Iriteria of
Sahih Bukhari %nd Sahih muslim
,
Any -ahil ,ho does ,eird criticism to prove such 9adiths ,ea3 is a -ahil and should not be consulted
for any thin reliious. salam

You're Reading a Free Preview

تحميل
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->