Manhattan College

School Profile Analysis

Student Name: Alexandra Antonelli
Name of School: P.S. 081 Robert J. Christen
Location District/County: 10
School Address: 5550 Riverdale Ave, Bronx, NY 10471
Telephone #: 718-796-8965
Student E-Mail: aantonelli.student@manhattan.edu

If your school is not located in the Bronx you will need to go to the NYSED.gov website and find your schools
report card.
New York City website is http://schools.nyc.gov.

Achievement Data
NYS Elementary English Language Arts
Students Results
Please pick one grade to analyze
Year

Level
Standards

1
Below
Standards

2013

Percent
# of
Students
Level
Standards

16.3%
17

Year

2014

Percent
# of
Students

1
Below
Standards
20.5%
18

2
Meets Basic
Standards
(Approaching)
41.3%
43

3
Meets
Proficiency
Standard
32.7%
34

4
Exceeds
Proficiency
Standards
9.6%
10

2
Meets Basic
Standards
(Approaching)
39.8%
35

3
Meets
Proficiency
Standard
33.0%
29

4
Exceeds
Proficiency
Standards
6.8%
6

Analysis of ELA Data Please indicate the % of students performing below grade level (i.e. levels 1 &
2). Please describe what Levels 1 & 2 represents (i.e. 1 below standards, 2 approaching standards).
Compare the last 2 years to see if there is improvement:
Levels 1 and 2 represent students performing below grade level. More students scored 2s in
2013, however, more students scored 1s in 2014. In 2013 57% of the grade was performing below
grade level and in 2014, 59% of the grade was performing below grade level. This means that the 3rd
grade did not show progress in ELA.

Achievement Data
NYS Elementary Math
Students Results
Please pick one grade to analyze
Year

Level
Standards

1
Below
Standards

2
3
4
Meets Basic
Meets
Exceeds
Standards
Proficiency Proficiency
(Approaching) Standard
Standards
2013
Percent
12.4%
41.9%
19.0%
26.7%
# of Students
13
44
20
28
Year
Level
1
2
3
4
Standards
Below
Meets Basic
Meets
Exceeds
Standards
Standards
Proficiency Proficiency
(Approaching) Standard
Standards
2014
Percent
13.4%
30.7%
30.7%
27.3%
# of Students
10
27
27
24
Analysis of Math Data Please indicate the % of students performing below grade level (i.e.
levels 1 & 2). Please describe what Levels 1 & 2 represents (i.e. 1 below standards, 2
approaching standards). Compare the last 2 years to see if there is improvement:
Levels 1 and 2 represent the students performing below grade level. More students
scored 1s and 2s in 2013 compared to 2014. In 2013, 54% of the grade was performing
below grade level and in 2013 42% of the grade was performing below grade level. This
means the third grade showed progress in math.

Find Information on Excel Spreadsheets (look at tabs on bottom)

Overview of School Performance in ELA
Results
Student Group
All Students
Students w/ Disabilities
Limited English
Proficient
General Ed

Total #
Tested
104
18
6

2012-2013
% Levels
1-2
57.6%
83.4%
100%

86

52.3%

% Levels
3-4
42.3%
16.7%
0%
47.7%

Total #
Tested
88
19
7

2013-2014
% Levels
1-2
60.3%
89.5%
100%

% Levels
3-4
39.8%
10.5%
0%

69

52.1%

47.8%

Analysis of ELA Data - Compare General Ed to Students with Disabilities levels on 1&2 and also indicate if
there is a difference between the groups for past two years - Indicate if there was improvement :
The number of students with disabilities who scored 1s ad 2s increased from one year to the next.
However, the number of General Education students who scored 1s and 2s decreased from year to the
next. General Education students scored more 3s and 4s on the test then Special Education students.
Analysis of ELA Data - Compare the performance of the ELL students to the performance of all students. Please
indicate in your report what Levels 1 & 2 indicate. Compare the last 2 years to see if there is improvement:
The number of students that received 1s and 2s increased from one year to the next. The number of
ELL students had no change from one year to the next. All students scored 1s and 2s both years. All
students scored more 3s and 4s compared to the smaller group of ELL students.

Find Information on Excel Spreadsheets (look at tabs on bottom)

Results
Student Group
All Students
Students w/ Disabilities
Limited English
Proficient
General Education

Total #
Tested
105%
18%
8%
87%

Overview of School Performance in Math

2012-2013
% Levels
% Levels
Total #
1-2
3-4
Tested
54.3%
60.9%
88
80.3%
16.7%
19
87.5%
12.5%
9
48.2%

51.7%

69

2013-2014
% Levels
1-2
42.1%
89.5%
44.4%

% Levels
3-4
61.4%
10.5%
55.6%

42%

71%

Analysis of Math Data - Compare General Ed to Students with Disabilities levels 1&2 and also indicate if there
is a difference between the groups for past two years - Indicate if there was improvement :

The number of students with disabilities who scored 1s and 2s increased from one year to the next.
However, the number General Education students who scored 1s and 2s decreased from one year to the
next. General Education students scored more 3s and 4s on the test then Special Education students.

Analysis of Math Data - Compare the performance of the ELL students to the performance of all students.
Please indicate in your report what Levels 1 & 2 indicate. Compare the last 2 years to see if there is
improvement:

The number of students that scored 1s and 2s decreased from one year to the next The number of
ELL students that got 1s and 2s dramatically decreased from one year to the next. All students scored
more 3s and 4s compared to the smaller group of ELL students.

Find the information on the School Report Card

www.nysed.gov
Year

Eligible for
Free Lunch

Demographics
Reduced
Student
Price Lunch
Stability

2011

44%

#278 12%

#75

Limited
English
Proficient
11%
#73

2012

38%

#238 14%

#88

10%

Notes

#65

Analysis of Data Indicate any or no changes over the two years:

Fewer students are eligible for free lunch in 2012 compared to 2011. More students
are eligible for reduce lunch in 2012. This could be a result of more working class
parents with children in the building. There are less limited English proficient student
sin 2012 compare to 2011. This could because less people came into the country that
year.

Racial/Ethnic Origin
Year

American
Indian/ Alaska
Native

Black or
African
American

Hispanic or
Latino

Asian or Native
Hawaiian/ Other
Pacific Islander

White

2011

1%

#5

11%

#68 46% #291 13%

#81

30%

#188

2012

1%

#4

10%

#62

#70

30%

#185

47% #295 11%

Analysis of Data Indicate any or no changes over the two years:

The percentage of American Indian/ Alaska Native students from 2011 to 2012 had no
changes over the two years. The percentage of African American students slightly
decreased. The percentage of Hispanic or Latino students increased over the two
years. The percentage of Asia or Native Hawaiian/ Other Pacific Islander students
decreased over the two years. The percentage White students had no change over the
two years.

Year
2010-11

Attendance & Suspensions

Attendance %
Suspensions
94%
#
2%
#16

2011-12

95%

0%

Notes

#1

Analysis of Data Indicate any or no changes over the two years

From 2010-2011 to 2011-2012 the attendance increased in the school. The suspensions
decreased over the two school years.