This book is about the festive viewing of televison. It's about those historic occasions that are televised as they take place and transfix a nation or the world.
This book is about the festive viewing of televison. It's about those historic occasions that are televised as they take place and transfix a nation or the world.
This book is about the festive viewing of televison. It's about those historic occasions that are televised as they take place and transfix a nation or the world.
MEDIA EVENTS
The Live Broadcasting of History
Danie! Dayan
Elihu Katz
Harvanp University Press
lassachuret
Cambridge
London, Englandcoi ed nn endo
pi be Sr an
at Hand Unive Pepe ein, 18
say of Congo Ctslogng Fb Dts
Din, Daniel 198-
Ma vets the i beng ft / Daniel Daan
Includes igh elrnesedinde
Kan 0745939
Isevesr 59503)
1 Ten eg nes Mn
CONTENTS
Preface
1 Defining Media Events:
High Holidays of Mass Communication
Scripting Media Events
Contes, Conquest, Coronation
Negotiating Media Events
Pesfooming Media Events
Celebrating Media Events
Shamanizing Media Events
Reviewing Media Events
Appendix: Five Frames for Aswesing the Effects of
Media Events
Notes
References
Acknowledgments
IndexDefining Media Events: High Holidays of
Mass Communication
‘elev at they tak pla
‘They include epie contest of polities
rmissions, and the tes of pasiage of the giest—hat we cal
Conte 3nd Covonations. In spite of the aire
‘ences among thet, evens such a the Olympic Games, Anwar
Salat joumey to Jerusalem, and the feral of ohn F.
Kennedy have given shape oa new narative genre that employe
the unigue potenti ofthe electronic media o command atten
tion universally and simultaneously in ender to tll a primordial
story about current aflis. These are event that hang a halo
over the television stand transform the viewing experience.
‘We call them collectively “media event” term we with to
redeem fiom ity pejorative connotations, Alkeative, we
might have “elevsion ceremonies” o “etv television,” oF
yen “cultural performances” (Singer, 1968). These telecasts
share a large number of common aftibutes which we shall
attempt fo identi. Audiences recognize them as an init
tion —even a commandmto sp their daily roa
a Tliday experience. I festive viewing ist oninary viewing
what holidays sre to the everyday, these events are the igh
holidays of mass communication. Conceptually speaking, this
book is an attempt to bring the anthropology of ceremony
1Derivine MEDIA Events
(Durkheim, 1915; Handelman, 1990; Lé-Staem, 1963;
“Tamer, 1985) to bea on the process of mas communication,
Television Genres
Uns vey recent lesson wa thought ob saying nothing
wy of mane sala To propot that levon—hke
ieee men an pa ec 0
Conran too och dignity, ewe were thot be wate
Smzotpoprams tut tesion, They were med o be pa
‘ie and uceatve sed with sors Itended for an
Siicenitedaulence with @ shor stenson san. Socal
‘EEStor the my they had stated rai thy
‘Sched for mats sponse to pean atenpt, rf the
‘fps of ace, occupation, or cs of one. Some
Chez on longum els, takng note ofthe susie
Sreronment wih nich TV envelope hey viewen. Others
feed on th let of levison on scl ttn, sch as
ie
7 Ve proces and audience alien ame the exis
tcncea leviion gre, The brodcate themsev, nd te
TV stings in newspapers and magazines, gull casiy ro-
tame brbpe news, documenta, spon acon, ave
Wane, sation comedy sap ope, tary show, me
{how show, lens caron, ad thei. Researches in
Maw communications employ thee eateries to, at as
ste With he acto of xp oer tat dats tao
{Herzog 4 Are, 144 Wane, 1962; Kaman, 1972
Model, 196% Casta 1985; Cantor and Pigs 1993 ond
‘Aen 1985) ver ite sous work hasbeen de onthe char
fete of hee, how they difer fom one ana, how
iy teat conepnding fos n termi, what He
rrekager std ow thee meses at communicated
Dernins Meoia Events
3
Systematic study ofthe news asa gene of broadcisting has
secently begun to sal interest in the soap oper Epstein, 1973,
Tuchman, 1978; Fiske and Hatley, 1978; Schlesinge, 1978,
Gans, 1979; Graber, 1984; Mose, 1985). Cerin politicl
forms—national conventions, presidental debates, plieal
sdvetsing-have alo gained attention, and the station com
dy is having st day (Mare, 1989; Taper, 1989), Sil, uti
recently and with only ovcstonal exceptions, sci studies of
television have treated the medium as whole or in terms of
dlseet stimuli, without paying serious attention to its com-
‘ponent forms. The publistions of Horace Newcomb (1974) in
the United States and Raymond Willams (1975) in England
represent major taming points in the mapping of television
‘entry.
[Ris striking how iferentis the study of flm. Cinema sties
approach im witha literary perspective, as tents tobe clasfied
and decoded, sociological politically, and peychoanalyialy
The same Kind of clasiicaton effort has been applied —
although not alvays uncondescendingy—to the other gents of
popular culture. In Adventure, Mystery, Romence (1975) John
‘Cawlt elaborates on the dominant gees (he prefers to weak
‘of formulas) of populr fiction. In adventure stries—chivakc
tales, war novels, mysteriesCaueli finds the mesmge of
triumph over death, injutice, andthe dangerous enemy, The
clase detective story ands out in his category of matey and
leads the reader to 3 desirable and rational restoration of order
and ofpaifestion ofthe unknown, Romance teaches the all
salicency of love, celebrating monogamy and domesticity
Following Cavels, Newcomb (1974) attempted to delve into
the formulas of television. Tis was the frst, to our know
cela, thata scholar clase television programe syste mail
Fhe analyzed the program in each category and generalized
shout what they had in common. Inthe proces he proposed aDernine Mein Events
va
much broader generalization: that television, as 2 medium,
finposs an element of “fais” on each ofthe gente which
it has inhesited from the other media of popular culture. In
‘ter wor, 78 Newcomb, the Westem, the action adventure,
fd the detective story, nt just the soap opers or the situation
Comedy is domesticated by tlevision aif ata the medium
{whole tothe nuclear family, television’ original viewing
ou.
Television with a Halo
Even those like Willams and Newcomb, who pioneered inthe
clasification of television genes, approach the viewing exper-
fence not in terms of dsrete programs but in terms of the pat
tered sequences of stimuli (images, issues, messages stories)
that constitute an evening’ viewing. ‘They prefer to speak of
"sips (Newcomb and Hitch, 1983), “Row” (Willams, 1975),
compounded interruption Howson, 1984), clentless mesages
{Gerbmer etal, 1979, moving wallpaper, and mindless chew
ing gum (Hood, 1967; Cakventihalyi and Kules, 191).
‘Even iit tue that most of television melds into some such
seamles“supetet” (Browne, 1984), there are cetain types of
programs that demand and recive focused attention (Liebes and
te, 1990), Media evens are one such gene. Unique to tle-
ison, they dif matkedly frm the genes ofthe everynight
Readers wll have no trouble Wentiyng the kinds of broad.
cats we have in mind Every nation has them. Our sample of
{oven ofthese event, internationally, nclodes the funerals of
President Kennedy and Lord Louir Mountbatten, the royal wel
ding of Charles and Diana the journeys of Pope John Paul It
tnd Anwar eF-Saat the debates of 1960 between John Kennedy
tnd Richard Nivon, the Watergate heasngs, the revolutionary
‘hanges of 1989 in Eastern Bucope, the Olympics, and othe.
Derinin MeoIa Events
5
Wehane sid acount and vio coring f hese
‘and have ourselves conducted empitical research into five of
mh pic vocach no Be of
“The most vin ditrece even medi eets ther
fomalror gest nang tt toy aye,
tote. nf thy ae noma tne er ter
“Sec tena ow terest ute Ce te
bolita ht hak ery rote, eon ens pepe
Cscctal hing oi ent, owned Relat
Srstetng speed an cee we ne ied by
sero pcs atouncenet an prs Wet ano
{Shy ee someting spec nd, wpm te eon af
the cet, ae pied el ain Io the mat sham
‘events the interruption is menopolsic, in that all channels
f tga schedled poguming
etre get he, pray nv: Ral
tepndet aos ude the Consus Srslentng can
tardy ale re emi anouncemat fe prance
fh att happen
Moreover he hoping 12 The eves anit
sth or nel ne the ich ol ison det. They
Se hoc unptice, t atthe se a soneng
hg mone Bere Ine bento symphony ones
‘contains this element of tension. ‘Typically, these events are
ond ute mtn a ie ta eve her
jlo (190 wos eal’ atc tat tet he
tty the mc enly pve a hae ort asm
Son By-nue” ween oth te ven pac co
“se in td el one ae
that the even rot sally teed ye Sadoting oe
tintin. This Bd of comectn, in wal Sine, 0+ mee
pace~oe having aire toomeceta le of
Tei mw hal cov cated iho caponeDernnic MeoIA Events
6
by both broadcaers and thet audiences (Vianello, 1983)
Indeed, the complexity of mounting there broadest isch, or
‘is thought to be such, that they are hailed as "miracles" by the
Iroadcatters, ar much for thei technological for thei cer
‘menial triumphs (Sorohan, 1979; Russo, 1983)*
The owanizes, typically, ave public bodies with whom the
media cooperate, such as governments, parliaments (conges-
sional committees, for example), political pats (ational eon
Vertion), international bodies (we Olympics committee), and
the like, These organizers ae well within the establishment
“They ate pat of what Shi (1975) call the center. They sland
for contenmul values ad they have the authonty to command
‘ou atention. Is no surpise thatthe Woodstock festival —the
Tandmark celebration of protesting youth in the sinties—was i
tnbated at film eather than a ive television event
“Thus, the League of Women Voters and te two majo polit
ical parties onpnized the presidental debates in 1976 and 1980,
the palace and the Church of England planned and “produced”
the royal wedding; the Olympics ae staged by the Intemational
Olympics Committee. There may be cetain exceptions to this
rule: the European Broadeating Union organizes the annual
Eurovision Song Contes, for example, and the Super Bowl —
the American football champonship-~involves & direct orgt=
nizational input on the part of American broadcasts. But on
the whole, these events are not organized by the broadcasters
even if they are planned with television "in mind.” The media
ste asked, or i,t join.
OF coure, there may well be collusion between broadeasters
sd organier, a was evident in the Gerald Focd-fimmny Cater
ing ofthe symbols ofthe occasion, only rately intervenes with
analysis and almost never with evs. Ofen advertising i
Suspended. There ae variations the live broadcast of Sedat
fal in ferusalem war treated diferent by Israeli lleision
than by the American networks, which had more explaining to
ho (Zatices, 1981). While we shall have occasion to point out
these dtferences, they ate outweighed bythe srilaies.
ven when these progam adres conflct—as they do—
they elerale no once but esc? Thi is wher they
Saesteaahe Gap news ven oereconfct the nent
subject. Often they ae ceremonial ers to redress confit or
to restore ower oy, snore ately, to isitute change. They ell
fora cesation of hostilities, at east for a moment, as when the
royal wedding halted the stcetBghting in Brixton and the terror
in Northern Held. A rie permanent truce fllowed the
journeys of Sadat to Jeruslem and the Pope to Argentina
“These events applaud the voluttary actions of great pesonali-
ties ‘They celebrate what, om the whole, are eablishmentni-
tiatves that are therefore unquestionably hegemonic. They are
proclaimed Ror
“These ceremonial electrify ven lore audiones—a nation,
seta nations, or the world, They are gripping, enthralling
‘They ave characterized by a norm of viewing in which people
Dernin Meoia Eve
9
tell ach other that tie mandatory 0 view, that they mt put
al ele aside. The unanimity of dhe netors in preening the
Sane event underines the woth, even the obligation, of iw
ing. They cae viewer lo elevate the event by ethring
elore the television et in gros, ater then alone. Ofen the
audience i gien an ative rol the exertion. Figratvey,
atleast these events induce peopl to dre up, rae than de
down o view television. Tse bondass intgrate soit
a callctve hetbea and ahea tea of lat tthe eh
ad sepia author
‘A.More Parsimonious Approach to Definition
Despite its heaviness, we shall argue thatthe elements in our
Aefnition are “necesary” and dat no subset of them i “su
Cent” without the ther This hypathess does not mean tht
the elements cannot exit without one another, bu they ate not
‘hen what we ell media events: they ate something ee
Consider, for example, theTioe-broadcaing of an event
which is not peplaned—say, the ive reporting ofthe leaking
“WOM teigy padl at Three Mile Islnd (Veron, 1981). The
leakage isa great news event, but not one of the great ceremonial
‘events that interest ws. Thus, we ae interested herein the Ken
ned funeal—e great ceremonial event-—and not the Kennedy
amisination—a grt news event, The messages ofthese 640
broadest are diferent, thir eet are dierent, they are pre
sented in quite 2 dierent tone. Great news events speak of acci-
ent, of disruption; great ceremonial events celebrate oder and
ite restoation. In shor, great news Evens ae anther gente of
‘raidcstng, neighbor to our own, that will help to et the
boundaries of media event"
(Consider an event that Eto excite the public or one that
ot presented wth reverence by the broadcasters. Such events doDern Meoia Events
0
not qualify acconting tothe definition, but they are pariully
intresting because they suggest a pathology of media evens, of
‘which the former ean event manque” and the later an event
“dened!” by the Broadcasters. We elaborate on such pathologies
in Chapter 3.
“Thus, by converting the elements af the definition into @
typology—bere elements ae variously present or absent, of
pretent in varying degree can ident ateratve genes of
Broadcasting that dir from one anther by virtue of a part:
lr element, Examination ofthese alternative forms and the
Conditions of thelr occurrence will belp deine our own events
by providing boundary marker,
Gre additonal operation, methedotogically speaking, can be
performed on the defiition, By tansforing the elements into
fariable, one can note which elements cotelate with which
thers Doing so, one might ask whether, 2, the degree ofr
frence invoked by the presenter corelats wh the degree of
dower enhrallment
Presentation ofthe genre can be formulated more elegantly,
by grouping the elements ofthe definition into broader cate-
ove. The linguistic categories of syntactic, semantes, and
Dragmatice are well fo this purpose,
‘Syntactic, mea evens may be characterized, fist, by our
clements of interruption, monopoly, being broadas lve, and
being remote, ‘These a components of the “grammar” of
‘roadsting, The cancellation of regula scheduled programs
andthe convergence of channels are the most dramatic Kinds of
pncuston available to broadcasten. They put a fll slop
erthing ele onthe ai; they combine the eacophony of many
Simultaneous channels into one monophonic line. OF course,
these elements ao eae semantic meaning they speak ofthe
teats ofthe event. Ard they havea pragmatic aspect a well:
Derinine Meoia Events
1"
the interruption ofthe sequence of television pus a stop tothe
normal ow of ie
"The live and remote broadcast takes us back and forth
between the studio and some fray place. Such broaden
employ special thetorcal forms andthe technology required to
aonnect the event and the studio. The language i the language
of transportation —"We take you now to...” Both petres and
words at slowed to a ceremonial pace, and aesthetic consider
ations ae unvsualy important. The pictures of media event,
relative to their words, cary much more weight than the ba.
‘nce to which we ate accustomed in the nightly news, where
words are far more important than pictures (Altman, 1986, Katz,
‘Adon, and Parnes, 1977) The cently of these various ee
ments of syntax is immediately apparent when one compares the
‘event il to cach subsequent representation ofthe event—the
‘wap-up, the news, and the eventual anniversaries: length i
Arasicallyeut pace is speeded up, words reset their impor.
tance; references to the heroic logit of the broadens diap-
pear. Syntactic unpredictability (that matches the semantic
"uncertainty i smoothed ove
"The fac that the event i stated outside broadeating or
izations, both physically and oqanizaionally implies a net
‘work of connections that dif frm the everyday. The special=
ists of outside broadeasing deploy their OB units—as the Brith
call them—and the studio now serves a intermediary between
its people in the field and the audience, allowing some ofthe
Aialogue of stage diestions between studio and field to become
pat of the spectacle, Thee cadence it reverential and eee:
ial
“The intetption, when it comes, has been elaborately adver-
ised and rehearsed. Ie ental @ major commitment of man-
‘owe, fechnology, and resources on the part of xganizers andDernnc Meota Evens,
@
beats comes ota compete supe in mor
nombre —butar something long antici ad Told fo
Sd toe holiday. ne to makecerain that he pot
{this rial feming wil tbe lot on he adience the broad
Gates spend hour tometimes dy cheng he sence
inthe ces inet, imeabl and symble. ven one
fie event an betaine in hi ay
"The mening af the events seman dimension Hep
icy propre! by is onanizes and shared by the bos
Caer alhough ths pot requeselaborton (se Chapter
3 Oteouse, each eet is spect his ead For example,
the wyel edding was propor a» Cinder vn thee
landing athe new American foie, andthe papal iplomacy
as pllenmage, Regards ofthe species of each ett, the
gpere a a hele cosine a eto core meanings cen loudly
Frolaimed. ‘Ths al sch event te Bal hi hey
‘te to mad a now sz, shang an lao dt oF
‘inking of marke pine oan eta. Whetier ti the
lpn ov Wace, Sato the Pope, the ung pint
Charme of the event cota
The event tures the performance of smal acs tht have
scene forene or ot of the core vile of act (Ukr,
1973) By dint te cooperain ete onan and Brod.
caters, the event is preset with crema reverence, i
tons that exes wey and ave
“The mesge one of renin, in which paripnts
and adie invited tonite in he overoming of confit
rat feat ini ptponenet or miitreation. Aol of
these tens fave ee igus nou be nats the
tincgratn of okt roped
Tregmaecall, the eat ena vey lee ois A
sation or sel raion, sonctine eC word, ay be
ined while watching the mpedhunan achiowement of an
Dennins MEDIA Events
B
‘Olympic star oc an atonaut. Sedat elected the people of
lac, and the Pope revived the spirit of the Polish people
These ae thrilling even, reaching the largest audiences inthe
history ofthe world. They ate shared experience, iting view=
‘erswith one another and with their societies. A norm of viewing
‘accompanies the airing ofthese evens, As the day approaches,
People tell one another that viewing is obligatory, that no other
ctv is accepabl dusing the broadcast. Viewers atively ele
rate, refering to view inthe company of others and to snake
special preparations—unusual foo, fr example-—in onder to
stake more lly inthe event
The gente is best defined, then, atthe intersection of the
syntatc, the semantic, andthe pragmatic. And, as was argued
above, we shall contend that ll the elements are “necessary”
If we chose to apply the pragmatic eritrion alone, the events 30
defined would include television programs that entalled very
lange audiences, such asthe early miniseries or pethaps even
ley episodes of programs such at “Dallas” They might abo
include im that attracted lage, sometimes cultih audiences
such asthe Rocky Horr Petre Show or Woodstock these were
indeed compulsory viewing for certain segments ofthe popula:
Yion and invited widespead participation, If syntactcs were the
sole criterion, major news evens woud demand tobe inloded.
By the same token, ifthe genre were defined in terms ofthe
semantic alone, we should number among media events al
‘hose films and programs that cisim tobe historic, preach rec
‘onciliaton, celebrate initiative, and ate produced and presented
with reverence. Films ofthe Olympicr by Leni Rife, Kon
Tehilawa, or Clade Lelouch, for example, might therefore
ali
Hence our insistence on defining the corpus of event in
ters ofall thre Linguistic categories, an insistence Further jus
tiled by the fet that we are desing with ceremonial perfor:Po
Derinine Mein Events
ry
ances ard that no such performance ean be described in terms
‘ofits text alone, A ceremony interrupts the Bow of daylife
(eyes it dels reverenly with sacred matters Gemantis}
and it iwolves the esponse (pragmatics) of a comuted audi-
Why Study Media Events?
Lplicit in this dfiition ofthe genre are answers to the ques
tion, Why study media event? Te student of modem society
‘ot jst of television fda dozen more powesfl a+
sons for doings. Let us spell them out
T The lve brosdeasting ofthese television events ata the
largest audiences in the histry ofthe world. Lest we be misun-
dettod, we ar talking about audiences as age 38500 milion
people atending othe same mls atthe same time, at the
moment ofits emision, Ite conceivable that there were cum
lative audiences of ths size rir tothe electronic age—for the
Bible, for example. Pethapr one might hve been abe to say
that there were feveral hundred milion people ave on earth
who Id fea, oF heard tll of, the same Book, But it was
fot unt radio bneadesting—and hore radio rceivers—that
sinutaneity of exposure became possible. ‘The enerriy ofthis
fuience together with the awareness by al fit enormity is
‘wee. It wall the moe awesome when one realizes that he
subject of these broadass is ceremony, the sot which anthro
pologists would ind fair iit were nt for the scale. Some
tf these ceremonies are so al-encompssting that ther is nobody
Jef to see at outgroup. “We Are the Worl” certainly the
sppropriate theme song for media events. To entrall such a
‘ulitode smo mea feat to els their assent debs all of the
‘caveats of media-efets esearch.”
Derinine Meoia Evers
5
2. The power of hes events He, fst ofall in the rr el-
cation ofthe ful potential of electronic madi technol. Sti
deni of mecha eects Know that at moa hes and places this
potential of eadio and television ie reticted by society. In prin-
‘ipl, ralio and television are capable of reaching everybody
simultaneously and direct thei message, in other words, can
be total, immediate, and uirmedite, But his condition hardy
‘ever obtains. Messages ate mltiple; audiences are selective,
social networks intervene; dfsion takes ime. On the occasion
of media events, however, these intervening mechanitine ae
tuspended, Interpernal networks and difision proceses are
setive before and afer the event, mobilizing attention 4 the
‘vent and fostering intense hermenetic activity ove sinter
pretation. But daring the iminal moments, totality and simul
taneity are unbound: onpnizen and broadeater resonate
together; competing channels merge into one; viwers present
themselves atthe same time and in every place. All eyes ate
fixed onthe ceremonial center, though which eah nuclear cell
{is connected to all the rest. Social integration of the highest
onder is thus achieved via mass communication. During these
rate moments af intermission, society is both a stomized and
Sr imtgated aa maiesocily theorist might. eve Ima
(ommbause, 1959,
3. Thus, the media have power not ony to insert messages
inte social networks but to cteate the networks themselver—to
atomize to integrate, or otherwise to design social srucise—
atleast momentarily. We hve seen that madi events rsy cee
‘eirown constituencies, Egypt and lac wer ited for Sadat
vist nt only by images of the arial ofthe leader ofa thereto-
fore hose Aa nation, but by means of an ad hoe microwave
link between the broadcasting systems ofthe two counties
Similary, the royal wedding reunited the British Epi, andDernine Meoia EvEnrs
16
“Third World nations joined the fist two worlds forthe Olym
pies That media events can talk over and around conventional
Foltcal geography reminds us that media technology is toe
‘fen overlogked by students of media effects in thei ditt of
Iypothess of technologial determinism. Papyrus and ancient
mpi, print andthe Protestnt Reformation, the newspaper
nl European nationalism, the telegraph and the economic
fnegation of American mackts, ae links between atibutes
‘of communication techvologies and socal structures. They
connect por, eprodacibiiy, inary, simultane,
fn the one hand, to empire, church, nation, markt, onthe
ater
'By extension, it ean be seen thatthe “center” ofthese mei
caendered social structres fot bound by geography either.
Inthe ease of media events, the center—on which all ees ae
fcund—is the place where the organizer of a “historic” cre
‘mony joins with sled beoadeaster to produce an even. In
this sense, Britain soften the enter ofthe world: one has only
fo compare the broadest funeral ofthe assassinated Mountat-
ten wih the broadcast funeral ofthe assassinated Sadat or Indias
Indira Gandhi to undentand why.
4 Conquering not only space but time, media events have
the power to declare a holiday, thus to ply a part in the civil
religion, Like religious holidays, major media events mea an
“Freription of rutin, days of fom work, nocms of participa
ton in ceremony and ritual, cancentation on some cental
alu, the experience of communitas and equality in ones
Tinmedate environment and of iteration with cultral en
ter The reverent tones ofthe ceremony, the dressand demeanor
tf thore gathered in Font ofthe set the sense of communion
Sith the mass of viewer, ae al reminiscent of holy day. The
{ciemonial roles sumed by viewers—mourne,sitien, juror,
“Spot fan differentiate holiday viewing fom evenday viewing
Deri Meors Events
7
nd transform the nature of involvement with the medium. The
secret ofthe eBectivenes of these televised events, we belive,
isin the role which viewers Bing with them from othe est
tutions, and by meant of which pave spcttoship gives way
to eetemonial participation. The depth ofthis involvement, in
{GF hat relevance forthe formation of public opinion and for
institations wich a plies, eli
step, they enter the Zllectve meme
5. Reality iw rolls events Wan event originates
{na particular locaton, that location is tured into a Hollywood
set The “oviginal” is only studio. Thus conquering space in
sn even more fundamental way, television causes events to
‘move of the ground and “into the ic” The era of television
cents, therefore, may be not only one in which the reproduce
tion is a6 important asthe orignal, as Benjamin (1968) pro-
poted, butalbo one in which the reproduction ismor important
than the orginal
Sometimes the original i inaccessible to lve audiences
‘because staking place in London, or because itis taking place
‘on the meon, for example. Even more fundamental are those
‘evens that have no orignal anywhere Because the broadeat i
4 moatage originating in several diferent lations simultane
‘uy, The “ality” of Kennedy’ debating Non when one was
in New York and the other in California snot diminished for
its being inthe ait, and inthe living room. Prince Charles,
the church, is wating for Lady Dina a8 her crcage is drawn
through the sets of London. Ths reality. But its an ivi
ible reality that cannot be apprehended as such because iti
happening simultaneously at diferent places. No one person
can see all of it, that is, exept the lelevision dsctor and
Ihundieds of milion their homes.
16. The process of producing these events and tling their
story relates to thea of television, journalism, and nataton.
etn BaerFO
Devine Meoia Events
6
‘Study of the theorical devies for communicating fstvin,
enlisting participation, and mobilizing consensus demands
Srwetst the questions of how television manages to profect
‘ual and ectemony in the two-dimensional space of spectacle
Essential to an understanding ofthese eent-—in aditon to
the readiness ofthe eudiene to assume ceremonial voles—isan
thal of how the story i famed, how interest is stained,
Tow the event aggregates endorements, how the broadcasting
Half is deployed to give dept othe event, how viewers interact
vith the Steen, wat task are asigned fo the viewers. Media
rents give insight into the cehelis of television reduction,
together wh an avarenest ofthe nature ofthe cont that
btsns between orizers and bradeaters
The audience iaware of the genre of media evens, We (and
cetain fellow weseatchers) recognize the constituent features of
this rare bat recurrent narrative form, and so do producers and
wiewets, The profesional netwots”of producer: buzz with
information on the extraordinary mbilization of manpower,
technology, aesthetics, and security aeingerens requited to
mount media even. * At the sme ime, the networks of view
‘co eary worl ofthe atituds, reheat, and toles appropriate
to thee celebration. The expectation that certain events in the
real world wll be given meda-events treatment is proof of
public awareness of the genre. Iaclis appealed to the High
Court of Justice demanding that the warevimes trial of John
‘Denjaniuk be bradeas live.”
7, Shades a pita peTte=Ave media evens, then, eles
tronie incarnaband OPE stnged evens of evolutionary regimes
ind Iaterday versions of the mas als of fascism? We think
fot, even if they might seem tobe. fis true that medi events
ni society ina vulnerable state af as indoctrination is com
‘emed: divided into uceat cells of Family and fiends, discon-
‘nected fom the insitations of work and voluntary asocation,
Derinunig Meoia Events
9
«yesand ears focused onthe monopolitie mesage ofthe center,
Ihats prepared with room, This reminiscent, mutatis mtn
dis ofthe socal tructre ofa disse that oikes at night, oof
2 brainwashing regimen, ‘The threshold of suggest is tts
owes the mot slated the individ! ie rom others, the more
secesrible he or she i othe media, the more dependent the
eson is the mote the power to reward conformity or punish
deviation iin the hands ofthe communicator
‘Neverthees, media events are not simply poiieal manipu-
Lntions. Broudcastes—in Wester scietes—are independent
{For at leas legally diereniated from, government. They
Sonal dali and even commercial interest meiner oc
2 bul, Sezond, public approval is required for an een
Succeed oficial eves anna Be pose onthe une ling oF
tiling Third indiduals are tot lone, nt een alone
‘wh iy but in th company FBS wo they ile to
iin inte til fan event and then stn fade
Some vocies provide public are for such daca and
interpretation of provide only Iving roms and leone
Fam fends, home, and ving om future a ey
context fr tating aroused eration into cllective pli
tston Perth, the sine, o, hs
tading se pole a gon
‘de down by some These che
‘BaRIpUTAHVe poten of media events and limit the vuler-
Inlty of mass audiences.
Sill, the question of hegemonic abuse mut be asked contn-
wally, Almot all of these event are exteblishment inate, and
only rarely, one suspects, do the broadasters say no. Instead,
journaliss—sometimesreluctantly—put eral tance aide
in favor of the reverent tones of presenters. Broadcasters thusDernins Meo1A EvENTs
D
stare the conensal occasion wth the ognize and sais the
edie have hypothesaed that fey ave palit after
a
“4 When media event are cena a reponse rir eens
cr soe eis he link to public opinion i evident. Thos,
Shui media evens fave a commemorative funtion, ein
fag unas on anmivenaionof what deere to be temern-
tered, Others have 2 retrtve function following social
trauma, The most memorable of them ave «tansfomatve
faction insomuch ey the late o enact posible schtions
to vocal problems, som wing yt fer events
Sthch actually “change the world Inthe retrative dean,
as chen dite soil confict-tvough emphasizing the
{Mer bn Cones) trough raising the dees ofthe eet in
hom gharstoz vested (Conquest), and trough eb
Jn consensual aes do Coroaton
"atthe sane ime, certain events have an neal i
eating fancion,Hcleialy speaking thy ve a tans
Save RERSGSN, Howes hegemonically sponsored, and how
‘her aflmately rend they invite eexamation ofthe sus
ie and te a render tha aif sho of ie’ noe
Taking place n'a lial context, evoking that imate of
intone teflerviy which Vitor Tomer characterized asthe
“Rene male of ele the pio eat he eda
worl and experience a shattering of perepions ad cranes.
hen if the nations in which they are immer are sho
Incl and donot insttuonalize new norms teas they po
Woke eaicl soars ofthe takenorgrnted and mental
Sonal of tematve posites They poses a normative
Srrrson inthe sense of displaying desirable leat, se
Clone which ought oe but donot These ae reviens,
ts of the peaps poss, gman of fare in which
Dernine Meoia Events
2m
the mone of sce anid o pend fev oso fw
Sp Acai et pation eyo a peck wo
TO. One wenden whe he meen pete at 30
coqresion os woot dai fhe action et men
‘ed ty tn gonancy ene cto. othe, a
Coen yo ton mal sighing chats o-
ian ten, in lane of abe story, The dst
iecson wi ofl nana burner ili, te
Selene per ofthe peopled theaches, he ea
ingore fatal chartered ere We
tan fin Soto the Pope nd change the wth he pope
Gn tne to sve Atte fom dann by spring “Le
‘Si? Thelin ofthe wll one ole
Sit, snl, onan, ty mocestepl tor
cndetcs edn cetyl ny ned conte pt te
‘tinct. The ee fr pntares aco fo, real
thc yi far ad epr edicedy tn ay
From sey Ron 195) the tli of ea
rena, ashen ewes ae mde fo appar move ant
han tg actly wee. Ba ora events lective aoa
tmy bene thas dn, The elton of ston
mong pac opin newer ol ede, snd the ae
tdi ned the wean of East Eaoge i he lof
en
I Th htriof madi eretsinvtie, too,fr wat
ares ately shut te soonest deca
fbllaran common, bt alo about he difence ewer
ural sl scal ence and ttocen popular ad 2
cist The meta wens of eoster—he Hind we
comer hee peas empl ent
‘ass support they tke the fr of pol
‘Trebroneating of heroic mioone—thowe that nite the pubsa
Derinine Meoia Events
2
Tic wo embrace heroes whe have pat their ves and eputitions
‘on the linen the eause of propesed change." The ceremenis
fioaitarian societies (Lane, 198) ate more commemorative
They abo seek to enlist suppor, but for present and past; the
First of May parade was 4 more characteristic media event io
postwar Eastern Europe (Lendvay. Tolges, and Tomba, 1982)
hana space shot Teronst events contrat with both ofthese
Jn thie display not of persuasion but of fore, not of majesty
bat of diuption and provocation,
"The shelori of media evens contast—as dos journalism,
senerally—wth academic thetvic in its emphasis on rest indi~
‘ills and apocalyptic events. Where social seience ses lng
tun deterministic proces, joumalsm pefors heres o villains
tho get up one moming eolved t change the work. Where
Teademic bistorians see events at projective of underlying
trends, journalist prefer 4 roboscopc history which Moses,
amatie events om and ofthe seren, heh
12 Media events gta Oe omg>Thisis where the “is:
toxic" version ofthe event on view, the one that wil be entered
{nto collective memory. Nowmally dh here represents areeat
fom the space of public deliberation, and television is blamed,
pethaps righty, for celebrating family and keeping people home
{Newcomb, 1974) When itis argued that telesion presents
society wih theists Ht has to face, the retort, “narcoirng
‘dsanction’=that i the false consciousness of involvement
land paticipation—is quick to fllow (Lazasfeld and Merton,
1948) Yet the home may become a publi space on the osea-
sion of media events, «place where fiend ad family meet o
Shure in both the ceremony and the deliberation that follows
Observational reearch needs to be done on the workings of
these politia ‘sslons” Ironically, ertcal theorists, newly alert
tothe feminist movement, now sein the soap opera and other
Dering Meoia Events
B
family programs sn important “site of genders” ad thee
derision of the apolitical home i undexoing ein
But there is more fo police than fens, and me ned
cevpitical saver tothe Question of wheter the home rans:
formed into» polis pace dring and air a media event In
fet we nee bac earch on who i home and when (night
ci the growing numberof one. and twogeson howehol,
tho views with whom, wh tals with whom, how opinion is
formed, and how ts fl back odeciton-maten, These cv.
day eccaon of opinion formation should then be compared
with media event It i at to believe, but nevertbels ue,
thatthe study of public opinion has become disconnected fom
thestudy of mast communication.
13, Media cvent preview the ui af GR. When aio
became a medium of segmentGubliing sence by
age and clucationtlvaion replaced iar the medium of
‘ational ntegation, Ar the new media technology mules
the numberof channel tlvition wil i become a medium
f segmentation, and lession-azne ino wel pear
“Tet o sation fntepation may devolve von tlw
sin ceremonies of the sort we are ics here. By that ine,
tomever, the nations tel may be on the way ea
boundaries out of syne with dhe new media technology. Media
events may then create and integrate commits le han
{ps Indeod, hegre ed evel ay Tlf be een ax
Fepone tothe integrative needs of national ad, increasing,
international commis and organizations.
Cerin multinational interes have aleady spoted the
pote of international events and may sik the gene inthe
Proce, Some combination ofthe televised Opes and eee
tied philanthropic marathons insped the elt to enlit
wove ai to combat amine in An Satelite boadatersDernine Meoia Events
7
slready transmit ive sports events multinationally (Uplinges,
1990; but see Myton, 1991). Aroused collective feling must
hea gest ie to adverse, nd one wonders whether the entry
‘ofthe commercial impresario into the arena ofthese events does
not augur ill for their sural as necessanly occasional, and
heavily valueladen, “high holidays
2
Scripting Media Events:
Contest, Conquest, Coronation
|As we have said the corpus of events ean be subdivided into
Contests, Conquest, and Coronation. These are story forms,
‘or “aripts" which constitute the main nartive possibilities
within the gene. ‘They determine the distbution of roles
within each type of event and the ways in which they will be
‘enacted. Venturing beyond the exposition ofthis typology, we
shall propose that the thre story fom are dramatic embod
‘ments of Weber’ (1946) hte ypes of authority nother word,
that rationality, charisma, and tition are incibed respec:
Svaly in Contest, Conquest, and Coronation
Certain events do not altogether corespond to any one ofthe
three dominant scenarios, while ater events appear to itch
in midteam, aif they were conceived in terms of competing
serpt. All media events, finally, even those which stony
adhere toa given srg nevertelese contain echoes of other
scripts which loom in the balground or are given secondary
slat, The questions of how such seit ae coven wil ao
‘ocupy usin this chapter and the next
Three Basic Scripts
twas television's Sadat who fret aroused our interest in media
‘vents Intl, itwas the specifics of hia example of media
Aiplomacy that seemed worthy of analysis. But the similarities
BPeeroRMING MEDIA Events
iis
‘eque form (cult movies), that @ new typeof public event may
be entering ou vs
‘Catering in amboyantlyfesich dapay toa largely adcer-
‘ent or pstaelescent public fced withthe dificult problem of
enti the gene of eult movies is obviously dierent rom that
cof media events, by the nature ofthe register cach invokes. Yet
both may be characterized by a similar blur of the dtinetion
between ceremonial performance and ftion txt. With their
midnight procesions of costumed spectators, of lookalikes
duplicating the main character inthe lis with the collective
singing dancing, miming by which thei audience greets the
sequences displayed on screcn, cult movil tat Beton texts
‘but move from mere spectacle toward the realm of performance.
‘They ae tured ito ceremonies
Public events are not fixed in a given form once and forever,
‘Throughout history they have tended to aap themselves to the
prevailing modes of making an event public. The donsinant
‘mode of publieness is changing now. We ate witnessing the
‘adual replacement of what could bea theatrical mode of pu
Tienes-—an actual meeting of performers and public in los
lions suchas paliament houses, churches, convention flor,
stadiums—by anew mode of pubienes bas onthe epsation
of performers and audiences, and onthe rhetoric of narative
rather than the vite of contact, Born with cinema and ist
described in aesthetic terms by Walter Benjani, this new mode
of publics culminates in television, which transfers tt all
21exs of public if including the most taditionally sacred the
politi and the eligiour—ths profoundly acting the nature
of public ceremonies and ocasions. Separatal fom the large
majority of thee publi, these modern sual dgplay the tex:
ture, internal coherence, narrative “best” and visual gow
which ured to characterine Hollywood spectacular,
5
Celebrating Media Events
Media events are ritual of coming snd going. The principals
make ritual enties into a sacred space, and if fortune sniles on
them they mae sitalretims. The elementary proces under
lying these dramatic forms isthe rte de pose, consisting of
situa of separation, of entry int 2 Timinal pcod of al and
teaching, and of retum to normal sci, ofen in a newly
assumed Tole (Van Gennep, 1909). Such liminal periods,
according to Tuner (1977), evoke the subjnetive—thoughts of
what might be, or what should be, eather than what
‘These tensions in and out and between ae dangerous, and
coke anxiety and enthallment in believers and well-wishers,
too. Indeed, it sof us thatthe hero i taking leave it i for us
that the heto is undergoing great ski stows that be will
‘return, Lift and plashdown, even more than what happened
on the fice ofthe moo, are the drama ofthe moon landing,
s9ys Stanford (1979), We are not surpized that lave taking
‘moved us at the Kennedy funeral, but even antagonists and
gnats were moved by the leavetakng from Nixon afte his
televised resignation speech (Lang and Lang, 1983) or from
Pope John XXII upon his death (Crit, 1968)!
No less than the principals, we—the witneses to these
cyents—fraverse the same tual stages. If we accept the init
tion to assume @ ritual role, we take leave of everyday routine
together with our heroes, experience the liminaly of thet
19CCeveoeanne Meoia Events
10
Srey rsh vives and mae ego
‘vents invite tual paieipation, by (1) ofering ice and equal
sere cine ow tne seco es Whee
EES :’”=~C Ol
Cetesearins Méoia Events
Ri
of the events, the social context of reception, and the sci
Prcholog of identification and interacts
Routine and Festive Viewing
Festive broadists of motia events contast so sharply with
rsyday boaas that itis wefl to think of thm aoe
Imetia, Tue, bth propose to tanspot the viewer hom his
chat tothe word outside. But the similarity tops ther Re
tine nighttime viewing postions the ted viewer in font of
{in the aplitcal livingroom.
Evening television tls family members, ft that they want
{ofeel comfortable with one another at home, a, scone, ta
they wish ob amused bythe antics and crimes of familar toy
ffuracters who ace ppiclly remote fom thet word, It el,
them that they haves “ight” to be entertained any time atta
gq shoosing, and that they have freedom of choice stwong
channels amd genres Itinvtes them to consider the sdveteed
Products andthe dreams or needs these fll.
Some theorists think tha this kindof sunnevee aes television
is 4 envasve tease. It engenden an ata of family sed
rth and promises 2 fallen thats never consumer
Commercial advertisements punetuate the flow offering pr
ts to sublimat aroused desi. The viewer sled inte conn,
‘emiconsciousess, The “tet” isnot a proprim but the fe
(Houston, 1984), andthe experience is lating, soporige, ber
tunchallenging(Kubey and Culazentmihaly, 199,
Gerber etal (1979) alo think ofthe viewer a victim, 5
rounded for hours on end by the substitu eeality ofthe teleug
sion word, he comes to dsbeliee, or disconnect om, his ownCCexgonaTine Meoia Events
m2,
personal experience, The message of television i thatthe word
fea fghtening pies; it mobilizes the viewer, unconsciously, to
five ideological port to the fores of onder that keep the
Impending cris at bay (Gili, 1980). The shows maybe one
rized in thiny- oF skty-minvle programs, but this mesage
inundates each and every viewing hour and creates only one
compote sory Choice, therfore, is merely an illusion, a
Iaegermonic device wed to perpetuate the myth of ream
‘Other scholars teat the viewer as feet, more awake, ad
more adult. His viewing ele is shaped by needs—for informa
on, fr entertainment, for identity—whose flllment he sels
con the smal sree, From this perspective, television ia kind
‘of public utility, fering various kinds of gatification (Bhumler
sel Kat, 1974), The viewer sa seeker. Cetin theovis suggest
that television provokes the weer to fae personal, social, and
acthetie dilemmas, however sugaroated, to discuss and t0
judge them (Newcomb and Hinch, 1983; Liebes and Kat,
1990; Livingstone, 1990; Mosley, 1980)
‘We know oo litle—even afer forty yeas of television—t0
choose among these diferent theories of everday viewing
(Sehndson, 1978; Kate, 1990). Pethaps they are all eomect—for
dierent sorts of viewers, or forthe same viewer at diferent
times. We simply do not know enough about the interaction
batween the role expectations of viewers andthe roles ofered by
the “text” We il know too litle about how people “ead ro
tin television programs To make mates even more complex,
itseem likely that routine television viewing x changing, i the
age of muliple ss, nuliple channels, and videocassetes.Iis
‘ovng inthe direction of radi, thats, toward pester axing
to diferentiated audiences.
By contrast, considera report on home viewing of the Gandhi
funeral:
i
E
|
CerepeariIne MEDIA Events
1B
About an hour before the ceremony began, we were ready,
shed and desed, aif we were going tobe pve pre
entat the een. My mather nae that we wea long elthes
nd cover cur hens as a mark of pet. A lige poup of
people congregated at my hour at thoy dl around mos ee
son sets the county. Both my servant, thei ene fx
‘ies and my neighbout (who had thet owe TV) were
squashed int my tiny Tving sor, (Minwals, 1990)
‘The major media events—the wedding, the funeral, the
‘moon landing, the Olympics~follow the sime pater, We
ere invited, perhaps even commanded, to attend the wedding
We were urged for days in advance to prepare ourselves. The
vent was well advertised and well reheated, so that viewers
would know what to anticipate on the day. Breaks television
Prograas inthe United States sent thee major teams o Brom
ast live ftom London a full week before the actual event
Throughout the English peaking worl, announcements wete
made ofthe timetable ofthe event, ll aimed to engender 2
sense of holidy, of anticipation, of planning for festive viewing
We were addesed as if we woul be ashed—perhaps by out
gandcildren—to retell the even, to report what it elt hike,
“Most ofall, we were tld that the event wat important, tht it
engaged some central value ofthe ply.
‘Wecame as mourners tothe Kennedy funeral. The fst news
ofthe Presidents shooting was broadcast at 140 p.m. Eastern
Sandard Time on Friday, November 22, 1963. When the
"port was ofcially confirmed an hour ltr, mot people inthe
United States had heard—more via word of mouth than fom
‘he media (Greenberg and Parke, 1965), “For thnee and hall
day following ist word oF tne asssiation,” says the norly
busnesike Nelsen repest, “all commercial lesion way su
‘ended, not only as an expression ofthe nations shock and ieCCeceaeariINe MEDIA Events
ry
but also in order to aire prompt and complete coverage of
cach succeeding development and to permit all wh had acest
to-a television st to share in such consolation as could be
fered by the memorial evens and funeral ts which mashed
the Presidents death” The networks, all boadcsting the seme
sto, al without commercial interruption, were ths “oon-
strctng’—fr thee ads halfdaye—a new viewer, one seeking
ether commodities nor entertainment, hardly even informa
tion, but the opportunity to ind in the tlevision seta focus for
cexpesion of grit?
‘We came in awe tothe moon landings. By means of sem
lation techniques, viewers wer briefed for day onthe workings
oftacket boosters, onthe division of abor among astronauts and
mission contol, on the atmosphere ofthe moon, onthe exit
ing andthe landing, The word was invited to set it alan for
the hour that dhe Eagle capsule would land onthe moon. This
was at 417 pm. Eastern Daylight Time on Sunday, July 20,
1969, almxt midnight in Europe andthe Near East. All thee
United States networks were carving the same pictures, signal
ing to viewer that this was by no means the evening news, but
history
Tn such a sitation the viewer aes note thatthe major chan:
nels ae all caring the same program. No choice hete—excep.
the residual one of choosing between channels. Not even the
choice of switching off No consumerism, because advertising
‘would volte the snetiy ofthe occasion; no dozing, either, no
Using TV as moving wallpaper o chewing gun. No escapism,
‘excep the demand to sbut out the concert af everyday if in
{avor of single-minded atention to some share vale thats too
‘oflen unsung, Indeed, if were nt fr the motivation of view=
fe to receive the program, prety television ofthe sort that
‘ecules us te woul! be an authoritarian imposition, dae
Ceuessari
Mein Events
15
‘metially opposite tothe ostensibly fee choice of routine tele
Audiences for Festive Television
(On an average evening in the mid-1980s, about 60 percent of
American households had their TV sets on, for a net prime
time viewership of some 95 milion adults or 100 milion per.
sons over the age of twa." Their viewing divided more or les
‘sully among the thee major networks, and the remainder
were tuned to lea or eble tations,
‘Among programs commercially sponsored and competitively
broadeast, the alltime most poplar single program inthe hit
tory of American TV was the “MASH Special” of February 20,
1985, 2 commemorative program of vo anda half hours’ dors:
tion, ts average audience was 7 percent of al sts in use (what
is called shar). Next in allio populatity was the Who Shot
LR? episode of “Dallas,” broadeas on Novernber 21, 1980,
hich arated 53 perent of TV howichods, or 76 percent of
set in use. “Root,” the annual Super Bowls, the Bob Hope
Christmas specials, «1976 two-part Gone withthe Wind, and
“The Day After" ( dramatized simulation of response in the
United Stats toa nuclear bomb) were not fr behind with per-
centages in the upper 40. Tt wll be seen that thet programs
‘ne “special” of various kinds, jut beyond the border of routine
viewing: holiday progr, miniseries, highly dramatic or one
time or once-ayear shows. Theit “special” character brings
them to the brink ofthe gene of festive television, Indeed, the
Super Bow fottll games, which annually tact close to 100
million viewers on a Sunday afternoon in January forthe lve
Haylf of American profesional football, qualify as mediaCCeveoearine Meoin Events
126
‘vents, The other, too, deserve serious attention, even they
do not quai
tis ate fr any segulaly broadcast series or serio attract
‘even one-quarter of households, The typical evening audience
spread ise aces the wavelengths and comes together only for
the extraordinary occasions illustrated above.
Media events, of couse, have this special chatcter In the
“idea case, they are broadcast by all ational networks and thus
automaticaly ensute the lon’ share of sin wse. Sometines
they ate also breast abroad. Many of them ste politcal in
charater—and have to contend with the normally low level of
politcal intrest in the American population, Nevertheless, the
number viewing the tsignaton of Richard Nixon i extimated
at more than 100 mien, and the audience atthe moment of
{he landing onthe moon reached 130 milion (Lang and Lang
1983), Viewers ofthe Kennedy burial probably numbered 190,
rillon, oF 80 percent of the American population of 240 mile
lion. Bighy-one percent were tuned in at 3:00 p.m. on the
“Monday ofthe funeral, and iti likely that most ofthe owners
ofthe unvatched sels were watching in oer people’ homes
tis interesting to follow the grovth ofthe TV audience fom
the 20 percent who were viewing onthe Friday jst before the
shooting, t0 45 percent within one hour of the Bist news, to
the high vigil throughout the weekend, until the climax, then
the immediate drop, on Monday affemoon
For extended events such as Wateyate othe Olin, the
numbers eached ae even greater. It sestimatedthat more than
70 percent of Americans sw sornehing of the live Watereate
hearings (Lang and Lang, 1953, and three-fourths sw some
thing of the Olympics during the summer of 1984 (Rathen-
bbubler, 1985)” During thit petid, on 3 typical aemoon or
‘evening a television set war fumed on in twoshirds of house:
the Olympics were on twothieds of those seteens. An
Ceuesearine Mein Events
1
verge of percent of househols wee tuned to the Olympics
day and night, and this proportion was surely much higher for
the major contest
‘These figures ae forthe United Stats alone, Estimates of the
world audience each 500 milion or more forthe ive broadcasts
ofthe oval wedding, the Kennedy fineal, and the Apollo Xt
space missions, although nobody can certify these nner, For
balance, it swell to remember thatthe anna telecasts of the
‘Acadery Awards cleim a worldwide audience (hough not 2
simultaneous one) of 350 milion or more (Real, 1982)""Thexe
Oscar awards qualify for the festive genre, to, Bu they are—as
te shall note below-—a very minor sot of high holiday. That
those ae the largest audiences i the history ofthe world goes
‘witht saying
The Home as Public Space
‘Americans mobilize “indoor” Except fo the occasional parade
‘oF eommemoraton or potest, not much islet outdoor as fa
3 politics are concemed. Contiasting Haan and American
television news, Hallin and Mancini (1964) note that Ualans
“tke out” the information they receive fom television news
‘o public dscusions a local party headquate, to the bade
‘union hall, orto the coffeehouse, In Prague and in Bucharest,
and at the Beilin wall, television fllowed the revolutionary
asembles “outside” Americans have allowed ‘eit public
‘pace ofall into desi
They do not have much that is political inside, ether. I is
safe to say that Americas donot often diss politic at home
“Television news gives the illusion of politcal participation, ss
Lazarfeld and Merton (1948) indicated long ago, and the
ecine in tal patcpation may indeed have been influenced
by tis isin,Cetenearing Mein Events
1
“The occasional media event ransorns this domes stom
zation. Ttvansfrms the home int public space. tonnes
tetwors of ineracting india, fom house o howe, sc
Nery le teitoies. While highly slecive—and biased—in
‘at ishven, teers brings inside what cane beeen eth
rise: We efx not ut to event tht are physically access
Tie but wo events that take place prima, somebines exo
Sively inthe ais Mot ofthe great polcal Conquest (Sada
thc toon, the Pop) tpl Contest (Wate, the pres
ideal debts ate out of sgt of on-the-spot audiences but
‘ell within the reac of levison homes”
“The Baianantopoogit Du Mats (1988 as writen of
“situations in whic the house extends tel nto the te and
imo the ci in such a way thatthe soil word is centalzed
by the domestic meapher a} on the oer hand. =» when
the see and is slues ted to penetrate the pate word of
the reidenee, withthe word of the house being inerted
ino the metphor of public ie” Unie pilgimages nd ili
thy pads fo which one nut eave home and ey, egows
procesion bring te centr represented bythe image ofthe
Tlie slo on a coxsena tour of siden neighbor
Ie
‘As the saint pases ad ise, the thf may tae tem
ora the rp, clo oa lyst tis ne oc
‘Group ad er ls ae dae in vor ofan
innate, penctatingand actveratonhip= BY
toca ofthe nn a atonhip desl ht nls ail of
tine uo ace flloving wel thse who ae watching
Here the suas ae tensed andthe Fotes beween
sec nde weaned peso, nae fs
sete tthe parc andthe ble pee ioc
Tre bo af edt the san. The stoner one of
the tanning of lye and of opening oneself the
Ceteneatine Meoia Everts
19
sacred domain. Thus, windows and doots should remain
‘open. Curtains and the best embroidered linen, as well a2
vases of flowers, ate paced inthe windows and on the vee
‘andes, All hiss done so that the int can ie” the house,
in a dramatization of opening and ofthe relational domain
‘hat should pein among men and ther saint, even in het
residences, where people have the songet losin, We
have, thus, the sacred the sin enteing ad bring recived
int the houses. (pp. 27-28)
A piquant tale fom th it fhe wansfrmaton
priate int pb pac te opel har meme, Oe
December 21952 te Lod Ret, fone
3 ry ccc psig Cage Vo a
oar mor mpesin” by ang te emp cs
1982, The ings “tocar fom myhome tye
teal of ou. omen ad women oct of ye me
ere tthe, ht oly ws ota en eh To
Sit eh wih a Happy Chins God tes you Radi
Ise in th omer dpa te ingot, Sone
vin view Eng do, ently Wang stom
1 tr Chrsenas doy te oy homage th soe
este viewers do ese sed up the ping ofthe
satioral nom tm eens a yan el ie Se
{The sll theme gat ton cee wep
fap They come peed to be more Rel wh
Sve ent sbout te Cunha“ Abate hou belo
the caemony bea, we weedy, nad and Sone if
‘ewes going tbe psc post tin eye mote
ied tht we nar lng clothe and oe or head
rope inal 195)
Ammicans and or pater n oe ance home fl
lo the supe son Apolo Mand her Ne
‘Arts ans Ante et to te no: ThyCerearating Meola Events
BO
new fom newspaper, magazines, elastooms, and offices what
to eect, and what to pay fr, at they seated themselves before
thirst. The journey triggered all the exetement of an cake
age of exploration and the opening of new fiontes. Comping.
the moon flight to voyages of the Vikings and Columbus, one
observer (Eisele, 1979) noes the new dimension which was
added by “the many spectators who vieatiousy traveled slong a8
psengers with the space explores. With the meon Fight and
Landing, a society of voyager took voyage, a space oxysey, in
which we enjoyed an unprecedented potion, om which we
cnfrtained the explore’ rks without risk experienced thet
—that he world
is, peshap, 2 more secure place thanks tothe American ag
planted up there
Evidence that people athe together to experience and cele
byate media evens in company isnt jut anecdotal. ‘The frst
‘ver presidental debates of 1960 were viewed in groups (Kate
snd Feldman, 1962). During the weekend of mourning for
Kennedy, people sought out fends and relatives to grieve in
font oftheir television sets (Barber, 1965). A national survey af
the viewing ofthe 1984 Olympics (Rothenbuller, 1985) found
‘hat those watching the games were more likely to be in the
‘company of ethers than the minotity who were viewing nom
Olympic programs atthe smc time" thin el the spl hed
invited someone ove t view the games, thitd had gone to
someone ele’ home to watch, and 15 percent had gone to
public viewing place. Viewing with ethers was done epeately
heoughout the games ‘These there wese“speca the people
ce
marin Mota Events
Ti
‘one spent holidays with, or went out with in the evening
‘Among those watching television with others, 80 percent of
Olympics viewers tale about what they wete viewing, comm
aed with 38 percent of thre viewing other programs
Im his study of the Super Bowl, Rea (1982) reports that “the
_majoity of viewers saw the game ina goup sting, used it x
2 social occasion, talked and moved at preseribed times duting
the telecast, discussed the Super Bowl with acquaintances
before and afer the day of the game, Especial fr the more
than haf of the adult males in Ameria who watched the gate
itwasa source of comvesation at work, in the neighborhood, at
shops, and wherever regular or accidental interaction occurs
“By game time,” Real continues, “the viewer pticipan's
‘now they ate joined with people inthe room, inthe stands —
all ove the county—in following this spectacle. As Ems Cap.
Sirer and others point out, the exenceof mythical belie lies in
the feeling of collective participation and sharing of concerns
‘and powers beyond the potential ofthe individual human.”
‘The conversion ofthe home into a ceremonial pac, focuid
fon the center and aware of all the other hoes in whieh the
same thing i taking place atthe same time, reminds one of
festivals such as Christmas or Pasiover. These holidays place
emphasis on home rites even more than thoee of church oye
agogue. They are oreited tothe extended fil and ae open
to fends, even strangers. They purse a sense thatthe whole
world of Christendom or Judaism is celetating imaltancouly,
ising a feeling of personal and communal fatenity and spit:
itvaity, These ocasions lnk families to centers, past and pres-
‘The Passover seder, especialy, is quite explicit in asigning
roles tothe cclebrants and in specifying the kinds of atitudes
and information that should accompany these roles. The ecle-
brant is commanded “to fel personaly aif he had been liber.Cetenraring MEDIA Events
BE
ated from Egypt” Hei enjoined to fie the homeles and the
needy The chiléten ask questions to which the ede must na
tate 2 response. The saint, Elijsh, hovers overhead and is
expected at any moment, and the table is prepsted For his
certance to partake in the fea. The house is altogether tans.
fomed—cleaned, polished, cetied, and sanctified, The night
's, indeed, diferent rom all ether night
Observers ofeeemonial evente—here itis dificult o separate
the eects of television fiom the pervasive eft of the event
iselhave ofen remathed on the expansive alrasm and
neighbovlines that accompanies them. Shils and Young (1953)
tel of the reconetiation among long-hostle neighbor a the
time ofthe coronation. “Hospital” sayz a writer onthe funeral
of Martin Luther King,Jr. (Puph, 1968), was everywhere in
flowering Alana. You could gets kif jst about anywhere and
white people all over their part of town threw open their
churches, and more importa, theit homes to Negroes and
whites alike"The sense of featernity was so gest when the Pope
visited Poland that our tanslator rematted, "We perecve our
government nota 2 represve force against the papa festival,
boats pciciating int and thus endangering sel” ischor-
steric of such event that they bring former antagonist to
reconsider, or at east to suspend, their antagonism
"The eommunta of good neighborlines and shard sii
ality explains. the open door ofthe seder at well asthe open
‘doors ofthe Kennedy and King mournets and of the wedding
oF Olympic celebrans. A pancipant inthe King funeral sid
"We can'find worst deseibe the way the fanerl has brought
black and white together. Is something else. doa’ know it
is because the assassination made more of ws wake to he reality
that we ae ll brothers or whether wee afraid theyll bum the
town down after they get him in the round (Pugh, 1965)"
Ceteseating Meota Events
Be
“Thus, the anxiety ofthe open doors evident too; celebrant of
the seder regard the outside at potentially hole
‘The thetoric of events very afen sil over into the sheteie
of family: "He was our brother, not our uncle; he was the peo-
ple Pope Sadat spoke ofthe family of Abraham and chatted
shout gandchideen with Golda Met, The fanerale and the
‘welding ate all about fmily. ‘The reunions—the Iran and
Entebbe hostages and the Koteanrefugees—ae about family
Kate Smith was suregate mother, sarong heel so that her
boys in the army might be beter supported (Merton, 194).
‘These references to family echo in the bosoms ofthe viewing
families The hot serve refreshments. Olympic viewers shared
food and drink with fellow viewers, mote than did those viewing
ster programs (Rothenbuhler, 1985)
‘The viewers are focused, intent on what they are seing
“When the sation signed of” said a Minneapolis viewer ofthe
Kennedy funeral, we signed of.» All day Saturday and Sun-
day I dont remember ding a thing. Idi get des didn't
rake the beds. I did't do anything. Monday we watched all
day and ered all day” Ancther peson said, “I walked around
the Block because I elt fT didnt T wae going to scream. 1
thought I could getaway fom it fora while, but it was ike 2
magnet.” Abou SO perent of viewers overly mourned (Mindak
and Hursch, 1965). The more they were with other people, his
study found, the more they grieved. The mae viewers experi=
enced gre, the more they felt something to be seriously wrong
with American society: And the mare they grieved, the more
they expressed a rededication to American institutions
Th the ethnogrphy of media events, major importance must
be asgned to the tansformation of the home into a public
space, at leat for 3 moment. This transformation is secom=
plished by a parallel change inthe personae ofthe viewer.CCeteneatine MeDia Events
ra
Festive Viewing Roles
Viewers sat diferent selves in front of their sts. Skies of
the influence of television on chidven suggest thatthe ci
eumstances unver which a flan is viewed wll acct what i
Feared and remembered, Seen at schoo, a documentary about
Eskimos wll be remembered 3s a primer on igloo building: the
same film seen at home will focus stention en the relations
‘betwen Poppa and Momma Esdimo (MeConnack, 1962). Seen
with parent, children will lam more fom “Sesane Street”
than when the same progam if viewed alone. Chilen
who expect entertainment fom television wil lam leis than
those who also expect o be informed (Salomon, 1979). Voters
who have come to televised presidental debates for help in
‘making up theic minds wil eat and sce diferent things than
‘hose who seck arguments for use against the other sie, and
those who wish to place a bet on a horse race (Blunt and
MeQual, 1968).
‘This choice of roles isnt altogether under the viewer con-
trol. Media technology and soil definition of media functions
ho play apart, 2s do the social and psychological characteristics
‘of audience members. Radio, for example, has been redefined
by society as an intimate medium in the ea of television, and
thanks to transistor technology it peforms this jab even beter
than before. Individuals swteh on their everhandy adios seek
ing music tllored to the taste of thei age peers, or uptorthe-
‘minute trafic bulletins, ot ave on lve or the stock market
‘There is another source of constraint that contbutes tothe
shaping of audience roles and expectations, This i the “text”
iself—whether the text be book, film, TV progr, oF nen
piper Thos, the TV enti of the New York Times hols bis nose
she reviews “Dalla” writing a Fis readers have never heard
EE EEEIEIS'S:S:=$~~-~
Ceteeearine Meoia Events
1s
fsurely never seen. He thereby propotes an identity to
bis reader, engaging in what sme socal psycologist have
called ltereasting. Texts (or films or programs) are produced
vith ateader in mind—one who comes prepared, ori enticed,
to interac in a manner that ha been preprogrammed, wing
oc not, by ts authors or dtscto (Eco, 1959).
Offen literary theorists, who have eyes only for tet, presume
thatthe real readers coincide wth the readers required by the
texts. Cia theors—thase who have given attention to pop
tla culture—also sce the predominance ofthe ent in shaping
reader oes, but aher in the sense that the texts act (or ete,
infect) their readers with a fale consciousness of thei social
situations
In contrast to scholars who infer readers fiom texts, there are
thers, oriented sociopsychologically, who infer texts rom read
fs. They ascribe 0 much power to the selectivity ofthe sea.
‘ence—in exposure, perception, interpretation aed seall—tet
they asume that any text canbe eshaped to ft audience needs
‘These ae oventatemens, of eoune, that coe the nersight-
ness ofthe literati but ascribe too much sovereignty to the
reader. The fact is that only recently bas there been scholarly
activity a the news of encoding and decoding. Certain trary
fand eel theorists are now asking how seal veaders deal with
the constrains ofthe text (Hal, 1977, Mole, 1980, Radway,
1968). And certain media researchers are now interested in how
teats imi the feedor of audience perception (Blumer etl.
1971; Lckes and Kat, 1990),
‘Mei events provide good opportunity to observe the inte
2etion of real viewers with the constructed roles proposed by
television texts, While ther are only few empirical studies of
the roles and the “readings” performed by viewes ofthese his
toric brodeass, all of us have our wm experiences to daw
‘upon. All of us~morepecsely those of who are thiy-fveCCeeeariINe Mein Events
16
or older—remember vividly the weekend of mouraing after
Johin Kennedy, the moon landings, and the royal weding, We
Fave boenn attendance, via television, at numberof the great
‘ren, and it isnot by chance that weave able to recollect where
wwe were at the time and how we “celebrated” them. We
mourned Kennedy: we explored outer space; we reaffirmed our
loyally to, oF adniation fr, Bits tradition. We judged pee
‘dential debates, played jury atthe Watergate hearings, wit
sid Sadat’ recognition of sel, rooted forthe Maccabi eam
i the World Cup, got up inthe middle ofthe night for the
Seoul Olympics.
Contests, Conquest, and Coronations each define diferent
we oes, 2s was noted in Chapter 2. Contsts—politcal and
‘porting evenis—inite viewers to dese rom mere spectatrsip
tnd root for one of the side, But even pertsanahip is more
‘ypical of Monday night football than of “historic” contests. Tt
ismor than mere partisanship when an Afican county defines
its woth inthe world though the achievements of ts Olympic
team, Partisanship isan undesaterent ofthe deep identifica
tion with 2 home team facing outsides, whether itis at the
Werld Cup, the Eurovision Song Contest, or the Olympics
“The audience “on the home fron sends mesiages of undivided
approval tos team, even ifthe efficent tansmision of such
‘messages must avait the day of interactive television,
"Mote typical ofthe histoxie contest, pep, i the judicial
role, We ae asked to decide, asa citizen jury and net ony 2s
partisans, who won the presidential debates, Thee is no other
judge. In evaluating the presidental debate, even the experts
try fo second-auess the likely reaction ofthe audiences. Some
evens, of couse, have thee own judges: the Wot Series has
‘umpires, the Demoortic national convention has delegates,
Miss USA has judges, the Burovision Song Contest has jury.
Even here, however, public opinion i elle upon to ply the
CeteseariIne Maia Events
a
withthe dg, een ee gs ape a eee
serine Sites Soe
84. We how that tere ate my who manage thet oy
or
suber ne aaa ere
eterna ert iat
See
Sar estanteruinags‘Ceveseanine Meo1a Events
18
‘aid they would go, We saw them defy the lw of gravity and
‘of man’s proper place. We marveled a the jeopardy in which
‘they placed themselves, fr our sk, We wer asked to ream
‘ou belief in American technological powess we were asked to
fenew our suppot forthe Nations) Aeronautic and Space
‘Adminstration; we were ased to give the astronauts 2 hers
‘welcome forall they risked for ws.
Tn his last geste in ofce, ovenwhled by the displ of
power arayed against him, President Niton mentioned the
theme of his sacrifice for the good of the nation sx times in the
fily-seven sentences of his televised resignation speech (Lang
and Lang, 1953, . 191), at ifthe president having chosen not
to go total, was now appearing as his own character witness
in television defense” Sil a Cont, it was already a Coto-
nation, ots opposite, ison was contibuting to the seme
‘ning of national initutons while puting his head on the
‘lok And it was aio Conquest, lone man staring down hos.
‘iy: The network commentators warmed up. Dan Rather of
(CBS sid, “Nixon went outwith touch of cas, even nobly”
Public and networks were relieve that the President didnot ove
contol oF mount 2 vicious attack, and the ansily evaporated
ina wave of sympathy and xdoen
‘Witness the sacnfice, witnes the miracle of achievement,
suspend disbelief, demand a just reward for the heroes, enter
the pultch of tcifice and countesacifice—these are the
audience roles in the teldrams of Conquest All these roles
dif fom that of mer spectator, berause they involve a dimen-
Son of commitment” Inthe eadly Christian definion of the
tem, theses ave converts fo a ew definion of truth ad
instuments of its subsequent propagation. In Austin’s (1962)
sense, Conguets equte thei viewer to adopt a “commissie”
role. They are converts, atleast fora moment, toa new def-
nition ofthe posible
CereseariIng Meoia Events
By
Coronation invite us to participate, inital as etizens and
subjects, inthe rites of passage of great men and women: thet
‘wedding, funerals, anniversaries, erownings, and deerownings,
As in Contests and Conquest, there ae separations and ren
tees, for both principals and audience. The space of liminality
here, however, is occupied not by heroic riko propored rede
inion ofthe wodd, but by changes of stats in the lasic
sense: fom bacheorhood to wedlock, from if to death,
‘The barometers of audience size and enthusiasm ae ea 3s
2 reconfimaton of loyalty s reiteration of the social contrat
between citizens and their leaders. The penton is welcomed into
‘fice, or saluted in departte, heralded for achievement, ot
applauded fr atining adulthood (Bhumler ea, 1971}.
Inthe ole ofctizen, weshudder over the undoing ofa leader
who symbolized the values ofan era and who succumbed tothe
forces of ation. Viewers ae asked to share inthe outage, to
tesolve that disorder will not be allowed to tiumph, and
accept the leytimacy of the succession, But beyond the civic
role isthe oe of mourner or of member ofthe wedding pic.
inating expesively. Coronation cll on us to attend, to share
‘motions, and to show that we care. Austin calls thse “be-
habiives: greeting, wellvishing, condoling, saluting. ‘The
‘mourning i forthe man, for order, and forthe dream ofthe es
he represented: the glory of Mountbatiensempite and theater
nity of war the new look of the youthful Kennedys: the Fry
blend oftratition and modernization inthe Gandhi yeas. And,
subjunctive, one allows oneself the hope that things may get
beter again,
Sometimes evens speak dtety to more than ove country—
to Exypt and lire] in the cae of Sadat. Sometimes they
‘embrace the werld—as dd the moon landings and Olympics,
For these national events that have sccondery aiences in
‘other countes—Indra Gandhi’ funeral, for example festiveCCeteataring MEDIA Events
10
viewing may be bieadly defined 25 joining in an occasion
intended for somebody ele. Within the primary context of the
event, however, the fac that it is not a spectacle but conce
of performances may be expresid inthe language of Austins
(2962) “pesformatives” The organizes, of course, have an
“exeritive" tole they have the power to deci public evens
Television joins them in the “expostive” role of making cleat
what the organizers meant by proposing the event. The aud-
nce responds "verde" in the ease of Contests, “comm
sively” in the ease of Conquest, “beabiivel” in the ease of
Coronstions
Festive Readings
Festne roles imply festive eadings that coincide wi the “dom
inant” mesages ofthe text. Festive viewers enter the peli:
nares witha feeling of awe in the face ofthe heroic and the
Fistor. They sense tha the event i olfeed nol just to vt of
the holiday from the everyday, but to mark a particular moment
of transition forthe sociey. The viewer is mst likely to sense
‘isin the ase of events that ae mounted in remponte to ei
the ive broadcasting of the Senate Watergate hearing, for ex
ple, or the funerals of maryed leader. Other events are less
Immediately associated with acute cre and offer new socal
arrangements for consideration. De Caulle proposes liberation
to Quebec Sadat proposes a new dealin the Middle East; Kho-
mein unseat the shah and his modernation, The foneral of
Enrico Berlinguer confirms the lptimacy ofthe Ralian Co
-murist party and signals «national font against the polities of
‘enor and disorder (alin and Mancini, 1984). Even the royal
veding—stensiby the mos rial of our events—may have
reminded Britain oft identity while economic and ethnic com:
Alls were raging, Lally, politcal conventions, presidential
CeteoraTiNg Mepra Events
741
Aebates, even sporting events, play this wole—of puting the
aly news into a diferent perspective, and calling attention to
‘the exential (or potential) sini of the society
"A proper reading ofthe ental message of the event involves
the subjunctive mood. If succesfully tansmited, the event
‘evokes images ofa beter world, a more fraternal or equal sc
{8,2 hint ofthe pesblty of peace, a rededication to cent
ineituions. Subjonctivty requires a sspension of dabei, an
intermission from reali
"Thus, itening to Sadat in the Kneset one might have
‘thought that Egypt had always wished Tel well that Baye
vas on good terms withthe other Aab sts, indeed tht the
‘Arabe were a uited people, The audiences in Ital and Eaypt,
and some ofthe secondary audiences in other counties aswell,
Tene that such was aot the case. Was Sadat ying? Or was he
speaking of what might Be? Only the subjunetive permits 2
benevolent reading by the festive viewer (Liebe Plesner, 1984).
“The Olympic, sayz MacAlcon (1954), ate deceptive in the
same sense. They present a picture ofa ruleabiding worl at
lay, orig equal opportunity to blacs and white, treating
socialist and capitalist regimes a interchangeable, celebrating
rot ascption but achievement. Are the Olppics a calletve
‘masquerade? Only a subjunctive reading that translates the
cent in term of what might be, or what ought to be, makes
the “dominant” eading posible
Alternative and Oppositional Readings
‘OF course it doesnot ahways work. Some people soub an event
in protest, Others view, but never abandon the distant role of
spectator. They rele to suspend dele. Some people enter
the narative, but with a diferent exentation, an altematve,
‘even haste role. Their interaction wth the text andthe roles,CCeveanaring MEoIA Events
12
propo by the text may be quite different (Parkin, cited in
Hall, 1977; also Morley, 1980). The Pasoverseder perceives
this possibility clea even providing serps for those who reject
the “dominant mode and choose “slteative” or “oppositional”
readings. Thus, the seer service imcribed inthe Haga di-
tingushes among four ideal readers, or sons” Thetis the Wise
Son, who abandons the spectator role to atk his queetion fom
within” accepting the legitimacy ofthe occasion and its impor
tance; ad the answer he gets counts him a member of the
‘pour “becouse ofthis God delivered us fom Egypt." The Evil
Son, the spectator, excludes himself. He aks, “What ill this
to you?” and the textual rete offers him an answer in kind
‘The Naive Son aks, simply, ‘Whats this?” and the answer
invites him to abandon the spectator role and to join in. “He
Whe Docs Not Know How 9 Ask"—the fourth sont help
with both question and answes
Fat fro the family ethos and paternalistic connotations of
the seer, John MacAloon (1954) mates a elated point in his
iscusion of the four faces of involvement he divers in the
Olympic Games: spectacle, festival, ritual, game. Spectacle is
concerned with grandnes, with overviewing the event a8 2
swhole, a duplay ofthe combined forcer of performers, peo-
ple, and power. But spectacle i seen fiom a distance. Festival
‘is total immersion where gamegoes, undirected fiom the cen-
ter, contribute penonally through pines, cafes, promenades,
and improvisations, adding coloe and activi tothe sene
Ritual consists in invoking the continuity of the games with
ancient tradition. In asigning ceremonial ols tothe pati
pints openings and closings and awards—it sets the games
‘fin parentheses, from the routine humdrum of everyday in-
‘equities and infelicies, Gane, rally, the contest elf fom
which the true sit of the Olympics radiates the mesage of
human striving, peseverance, and achievement inthe face of
enormous odds, 2d in the conte of one word
(CeceoeariNG MEDIA EvewTs
1
“MacAloon ells us how the word “spectacle” became taboo in
the official vocabulary of the Intetional Olympies Commit.
tee, fr fer that bignes and dale would further eniphatze
the show-busness aspect of the games a the expense ofthe
‘warmth, magic, and th which are the reward of genuine
involvement. Instead of entering the performance system
through festival, etal, er game, the distanced spectator poses
questions, “s this eval" he as, if there iso much bares
racy and polit? “sti ritual” if the pageantry as eeplaced
‘rededication? “I tht gare” if commercialism and nationalism
Ihave itor it rth?
“Even these doubts, suggcts MacAloon, may themelves lead
to the conversion ofthe skepical. He describes movingly the
‘proces whereby the games sometimes convert spectitors who
“merely came to lok" They fel themselves aught up in the
“flow” and abandon thei suspiciournest. MacAloon wits,
‘The spectacle fame erected around ritual may serve at 3
recruiting devie, dicrming suspicion toward ‘mee ritual” and
Tusing the proudly uncommited”
Fer MacAloon, television viewers ae sccond-las pectators,
Since “festival means being there, there tno fetal at di
tance. Television, he thinks, is capable only of pectacle—~and
4 cheapened one at that. "There-may be media festivals” he
says, “but a festival by media isa doubtful proposition” Here
we Fart company with MacAloon, aguing that the media
‘events spectator may alo eros the liminal divide ino festival,
ritual, and game, Toe, he has aces only to the r-presentation
by television superimposed on the orignal; yet he also mayer
ste his own home festivals and situs
Certain media events, we gant MacAloon, never leave the
teal of spectacle. Indeed, one wonders whether they qualify
2 more than that forthe people who are there. Many conte
te ofthis character. The annual Oscar ceremony is an exam
ple. Despite the huge size of is television audience to repeat,CCeugararine MEoIA Events
4
75 million domestic viewers and pesbaps 350 million interna
tionally (hough not simltneousy)—wo-thieds nevertheless
ceapessed indilference when quetied whaler the event should
bedicontinned. Clea thts merely spoctacle about which
‘ewes have doubt, and even that ia weak word. Viewers are
Well avare “that the Academy Awards are nothing more than 8
public relations event forthe film industry” (Real, 1982).
“Mest serous evens have thie doubters, to. Some remained
ambivalent about Sadat. In the national surey completed
immediately afer the 1984 Olympics (Rethenbubler, 1985),
roughly 30 percent insite thatthe game had no message for
anyone but the athletes. And some syed away fiom the Water-
te telecat altogether: disproporcnatly more Republicans
‘ded the broadest, and mote ofthe palitally uninvolved
Those that remained didnot ll read the proceedings in the
samme way, AS Lang and Lang (1983) sy about the televised
hearings, “Depending on the viewers Fame of mind, the pro
ceeding ould be seen at unifying event, a a teairmation of
de proces before the law. Or they could be viewed oppasition-
ally, a degradation ceremeny”™
Yet one can infer from viewer’ statements about certain
‘events that many do go beyond spectacle, tothe heat ofthe
mate. They recognized in Sadat nota deception but the pos
sibility of te peace. They made a ditinet choice btween the
‘0 competing models of Watergate as “routine polite” and as
‘morality play" They prteok of etn aspects ofthe Olympics
festival a home, even if i wae less esilatating and seo
tive than MacAloon’s festival. Among U.S. spectators, two
thieds connected he games to ideas aboot winning and lor
ing that are “important to life” and not just to athletics
(eothenbubler, 1989)
Tes important odsinguith among intensity of involvement,
scope of involvement, and fype of involvement. Thus, Mac-
Ceteoraming MeDia Everts
5
Alon’ spectator is(1) ss intensely involved, (2) mote narowly
wolved, and (3) involved in a diferent role (observer than his
estve” participant is. But these are quite diferent dimensions,
One may became involved in the Olympics, in Watergate, of
ina presidential election by placing be, by identifying with
one sde oe the other, by aking interest in the rls, or by oppos-
ing the event self. These are dierent types of involvement and
are revealed in diferent types of “reading” The intensity of
involement, in each ofthese role, may be superior rong
ven opposition to an event may be intense. The seope of
involvement may be defined asthe nub of dierent roles in
which the paticipant joins the event. These dimensions apy
to the experience of “not being there" at well sto the expe
ence of being there”
Diasporic Ceremonies
Can we sill speak of a public event when i is celebrated at
home? Is there a elletive celebration when the collectivity i
both atomized and scattered?
"To say no would amount to denying the sats of siialy
seatered and home-based celebrations, ote including sential
tenet of religious traditions, The example ofthe Passover eeder
‘illuminating because the oceasion i constitutes is aot only
religious but political aswell and might serve a a paradigm of
Emile Durkheim’ symmetrical theses onthe social dimension
ofreligion and on therligious dimension of social The seder
has served through the ages a5 «powerful means of unification,
offering a ceremooilstractre that takes account of geographic
dspesion by translating 2 monumental occasion ino @ multi
pliciy of simultaneous, similarly progeammed, home-bound
‘microevents while focsied, however, on a symbolic center. By
proposing a collective ceremony “without 2 cental uli terCeveoearine Meota Events
16
le" (olser, 1984), by tansfereing public celebration to the
hhome, the model of the seder—or, indeed, the home celebra-
tion of other holiday such ay Chistnat or Thankagiving-—
seems to have solved a problem, mutatis mutandis, very simi
lar to that now experienced by the dispersed mas f television
“Media evens der fom thes hlidys in that identical cons
ae delivered simultaneously to the homes of all celebrant
Media events, therefor, stand midway between the mast ely
cr pllrimage and the subjectively conjured image ofthe center.
Tansoumig the audicnce of mass ceremonies ito the huge
sudience of media events as led othe reinvention, in tty
‘ew context, of an ancient and domestic celebratory form
‘what might be called the disporic ceremony. Te, members
of the audience are radically separated ffom the ceremoniat
locus ofthe event and areas nolate for each eter they n0
Tonge form masses or cows excep in an abetact,staiscal
sense Television celebrant cannot react dtectly to the ital
performance orto the reactions of other member ofthe partic:
inating public. The very hugenes ofthe television audience has
radically transposed the celebration into an intimate regi
ter Atendance takes ple in small groupe congregated around
the television et, concentating on the symbolic enter, keenly
aware that myriad other groups are doing likewise, in simular
‘manner and at the sime time, Ceremonial space hat been
reconaitated, but in the home,
‘When there is no way of being ther” a ceremony is created
to encapsulate the experience of "aot being there” Rather than
an impoverished and demant experience, iia altogeer dif
ferent experience.
6
Shamanizing Media Events
"is coneet to regard most media events—no les than the tax
ditional eeemonies studied by antvopologits—a“teinforcng”
‘ot hegemonic," inthe sna that they sind acest ene
their commiiments to etablshed values, offs, and penons.
Occasional events, however, involve a discernible change nthe
reali ofboth the symbolic and thera. ive, the proposed new
values may be familiar, or sevivals of ideale that had been
despaired of, and the sponsors of change may be none ater
than the old elites themselies, albeit ambivalent of rec
tanly. Willys, and however hegemonic in oxgi, certain
media events sene as harbingers of change
‘We wll consider here the dynamics of interaction among the
three contractual pariness—ovganizers,broadeates, and sd
‘ences—in a suet of events that may be described at “tone
formative” Our most proninent examples, of couse, ate the
Conquest—Sadat in Jerusalem and the Pope in Poland. The
‘Kovean reunion event i equally important, while the Watergate
Fearing, the moon landings, and certain other occurrences ao
‘qualify in part. More recent and even more dramatic examples
_are provided bythe live broadcast of the mats demand fox palit
eal change in Eastem Europe in the fll of 1989.
"The mage of thi proces ithe subject ofthe present chapter,
‘We demorstrte how the ceremonial broadeas ofa propos for
change can, under cettin conditions, actually induce such
“7Reviewing Media
From the arursent ofthe previous chapters—that the experi=
ence of media event ident fiom the experience of everyday
televsion—it follows thatthe concepts and method that have
been applied tothe study of everday medi eects may be
insufcient to the task of asessng the eects of media evens
Ivan efort to fd these eet a theoretical home, this chapter
attempts to reall and geneclize the main efcets of media
events, gathering them together Fon all over the book. That
traditional eft esearch wil be found wanting i already ev-
ent. The reader will have noted how frequently we invoke the
anthropology of ceremony to augment propositions derived fram
funcional, etal, and technologies! theorits. The Appendix.
elaborates un this orchestration in an attempt to “ht” out find
ings the peoinant eons of communicators
Fist ofall, then, we wish to recapitulate some of the propo=
sition about the effets ofthe live roadeating of public cere
‘monies that ace sprinkled thoughout the preceding pages. The
‘eader will ind them familiar because they tend ta appeae in
‘more than one place, inthe several contexts in which they were
found relevant Ii important, however, to beware consing
famliaity with proof As we have sid, only very ew events
have been studied empiially from the pint of view oftheir
fet. Although we draw at mach ae posible om events which
188
Reviewinic Meoia Events
189
Inve been studied by ounver and oter»—i is est to think
cof our eatalogue of efiets a contributions toa set of intelock-
ing hypotheses.
"The review is organized in terms of two dimensions. A fist
Aistinetion i between eects that take place “inside” the event
and thre tht tae place “ouside” This distinction may sound
taradosical inazmoch atthe mutual infuence of ognize,
Iroadastes, and audiences—the inside ecetm—ate incorpo
rated int the very definition of events. But these are among the
‘mot interesting of ects. From the moment he lights are it—
inded, even a the lights ae lit inthe minds ofthe thee past
ner in anticipation ofthe event—ellects begin to take place.
‘The anticipated sie of an expectant audience, for example,
may aft the work ad shetori of oxganizes and broadest.
Inside eet take place “during” the event, ofcourse, while
‘outside efits usally ocur “afr theevent—but may, in at,
take place “before” or “during” at well Thus, during an event,
the presiue forthe event to succeed it clasifed as an inside
fect, whereas the cevstion of hostilities fllowing a summit
meeting i surely an outside eft. Think ofa wedding: the
{guess who cry a the sight of the bride are emotionally acted
‘vith the ceremony, but whether the ceremony strengthens or
‘wedkens interethnic relations in the community of atts
toward the inatation of marriage i an aerefiet ofthe cere-
mony.
“A second dimension concerns the objet of eect. We wish
to distinguish between eft onthe participants themselves
coxganizes, principal, bradeating oganizations, joumaliss,
‘spectators—and eects on inttations, such a thas of politics,
‘align, Tere, and callective memory. ‘The insttional
‘ects area Iikely to result fom the expectations engendered
by a succession of events—thit fom the exstence of the
genes fom individual evens. Thus, while an occasionalReviewing Meota Evens
190
vent may affect the politcal stem, for example, iis not spe
cific instances of such events which ae of insituionl interest
‘but ether the gene of ive political broadass of press confer-
ence, party conventions, presidential debates, election night
tetums, ad the lke
Tn the review that follows, the discussion is divided sowghly
between “inside elle” (hat tke place “during.” alec prick
pants, and result fom the species ofa particular ceremony)
and “outside eee (that take place “after,” fet institutions,
and result from the extence ofthe gene ater than fiom a
Specific instance ofthe gent).
Inside Effects on Participants
‘We begin withthe moment at which the decision is made to
‘ve “media-events teatment” t0 2 patcular ceremony. To
‘examine such eflets, we must dissolve the partnership of or
izes, broadcasts, and viewers in over to examine the efets
ofan event, separately, on each
Effects on Organizers and Principals
1. The public commitment to mount an event makes the orga=
rizr politically vulnerable even before the event takes place. In
the days or weeks preceding an event, policy changes ae
demanded, in heping with the opensess ofthe ecaion and!
‘or its consensual claims: On the inteational scene, for exam-
ple, participants in samenit meetings have lo make themselves
sallble to one another and tothe pres—for more questions
than they cate to answer. Silay, the counties hosing Olyn-
pie Gates have epeately been pressed by ater nation to
live up tothe spit of the event or be boycotted and denounced,
ar wete the Navs in the cate ofa black athlete, este Owens,
Reviewing Meoia Events
191
the Berin Olympics of 1936. More recent, the Cater admin-
‘tation ted unsuccesilly to presse the Soviets to relent in
[Aghanitan, under threat of boycott ofthe Moscow Olympics
‘oF 1980. Pretest against Bish refusal to denounce South A=
‘an apartheid prompted twenty-seven ofthe forty-nine nations
to withdraw fom the Commonwealth Games of 1986, tothe
considerable displeasure ofthe British ogeizer and thee polit
‘eal leaders, including the queen.”
2. During am event, prinpals ar cast in mythic les, ft
by the media, Thus, John Kennedy at his funeral is east a Line
cl, and Lady Di as Cinderella. "The principals may abo we
the spotlight to recast themselver Sadat and the Pope bath en-
‘eloped themselves in primordial roles the one alfred himself
48a aetifce in Jerusalem, and the other vite lepers and deliv-
eed sermons from hilltop fivelas in Brazil.”
3. The lve broadcasting of an event creates prewure on the
vent to svceed. Broadcaster can bring presto onthe pine
pals by brandishing the evidence of publi response, which they
cornmand, Depicting Saats journey asa sare, fr example,
‘evoked the non of reciprocity—the idea that he was owed
Something in return—which was fed back 1 the principal a
“publi opinion” and used to pressure the Iseltomanizes.
Thee i, apparently, a stong fea offing with the whole world
watching Thus the Reagan. Gorbachev summit in Geneva may
well have been embaraed into “succeeding” by television and
public opinion The exter for sucess are formolte by nego-
tations between principals and broadeasten, and audiences
watch for the sgn.’ The preue isnot only moral but ae
thetic, The event must succeed, butt must succeed within &
foreseeable time, that, in ul sigh ofthe cameras. The emo-
tion generated by the event ean ony bested if the cere
‘monial progress culminates ina extharie conclusion,
“The pesure to succed while onstage and within ceremonilRevtewine Meoia Evens
1
time leads to an imperative which we perceive as showmanship,
but which, in Sadats declaration, aquired the mythial status
‘of natural law: the success of media events depends on thee
sustained momentum, The primary elect of momentum i to
propel the events beyond thelr projected boundaries
4 Live broadcasting enhancer the status ofthe principle,
confring both legitimacy and charisma during the event and
ste. The fet of adtesing a world constituency places 2 new
sel of aims and responsibilities om the leader's shoulders, Once
validated by public response, what might have bee saewey
pojected image may envelop the actor himself. Media evens
‘make “elbrits” ofthe supposing eat ax well, whether they
‘xe astonauts,jouralists, assasing such as Jack Ruby, o phi
lanthopist-entepreneus such a Bob Geldof of Live Ai
5. Media events fiberat leader toa mare or diferent than
they cthersze might. Live Broadcasting untes he hands ofthe
principals. Capitalizing on theie chaima, thy fel fee to
‘make lager gestures than usual. Reagan fl fie to change his
"toric about the Soviet adveray after the Geneva summit
John Paul It ignored safeguards and cautions while on stage,
‘Sadat and Begin exceeded what thei advisors and political par
ties might otherwite have permited them: the congresmen of
the Watergate hearings abandoned partisanship and assumed
statesman snes. The confeel of charisma may lead the
political actor to the experience af anew sll, ain a proces of
Effect on Joumalists and
Broadcasting Organizations
|, Media events redefine the rule of journaliom. Journalists
become priets, as we have shown, and fill members ofthe
Reviewine MEDIA Events
15
ning fe pie eae
et So arc ir eee
wi Sreeetslinsaetein eas
sab ymelisiena rege ace
wae ay Wt Seeman sora
pas ae Soe re eee ee
Tetbacat cea ae a
thle, bent a ih tat nd
tei a oct te
Sina ee tated
eae ie ear ret vr
Soho Sinise oe
Ma mia her iegocte Kraehe
Fossa teanen tl eet or
salt asa tfoeck When hte
iene neato enti nics
none
Te patna toe tal
song eich fea
Seti chines Sodas ease
‘teat se
ere Large ec ae et
St eine Ses eatsReviewine MEDIA Events
4
the mit ofthe principals remind us ofthe effort and sacrifice
nv by the networks a prtiipants i, and patons of, the
‘sored
“+ Media events provide mada orgonizations with an oppor-
tunity to tet new formats and to embark on techrical exper-
mentation. Media events alo provide a showeate for broad-
casters to display the talents oftheir journalists and produces,
thus inviting advertiser and viewers to support their regular pro=
grams when normaley resumes. Indeed, medi events ply a
‘important role in the spread ofthe electonic media. The fst
ceremonial tansmision of any magnitude took place fom the
Basin Olympic Games of 1936, and we know the roe payed
by the coronation of Queen Elizabeth I in the grand opening
cof television inthe 1950s afer the war. The Olympics gave 8
big path to the introduction of television inthe Thind Wer,
Altogetier, th dilfasion of television in particule countries is
intimately asocited with major political events and interna
tional sports.
5. For media ognizatons, the challenge ofthe vent reat
‘ater the often forgotenenthusiam ofthe beginnings of tele
sion. Mobilising for the coverage of a historic event, media
‘organizations undergo the born-agin experience that Alben
(1983) calls stata nescond. For ol-tines the event provides
ew "honeymoon," senie of challenge, excitement, and rk,
‘They repeatedly invoke the lex *miracle™ to describe thie
accomplishment. For newcomers used tan already institution
alized television, the event provides a demanding ite de pessage
and a taste ofthe old das when TV was al live. Even within
lengeestablshed broadasting ongsizations, unusual coopera
tion among the units is equited, staining the ability to deploy
petsonne, equipment, advice, encouragement; and practical
recipes ona very lage scale. Such events also require pooling
and other forms of cooperation among normally competing net
Reviewine Meoia Events
195
wots, Restated isthe sense af profesional achievement in the
Service ofthe national or interatonsl community”
Effects on Viewers
1, Madia events interupt the rhythm and focus of peoples
lies, The momentous oceasion commands atintion to the
cxclusion of all-che. The interuption is defined not just as
“time out” but as “sacred tine”
2 The ive broadcast transforms the ordinary ales of viewer,
caurng them to assume the roles proposed bythe erpt ofthe
eremony, Even if the sti turned on intaly by escapss or
tnteainment teckers, media evens invite more ative partici
pation. They cal for mourners, pilgins, philanthropists, and
the lke, Viewers thetey join principals and journalists in being
“contracted” bythe serpt ofthe event. Some terminally il eos
ple manage to postpone thir death for the'sake of a media
tent ar ift were a celebration ofa mote personal kind (Phillis,
1983) Ina stunning reveal ofthe nation of "social death,” they
feed on clletive lif her role keeps them alive
5. Media events give new ttf the living room. By declat-
ing an event sored, and appointing the television seta its
‘medium, the homely sting takes on # new luster. Television is
revved asthe family focus, commanding tention and interest
and bringing farily members and fends together agai,
“4 Such festive viewing leds to that allemative model of
social life in which the usual down-to-earth, “indcaive”
pproach to social elit giver way toa “subjunctive” and uto-
plan openness to alteratine poubiies, In the cognitive
dona, the interuption of social time cll fra fame aware-
net, ateflexve evaluation of what serious and what is ot.
‘Or doesit give access toa higher reali? The public may reject
the events claims by eventually ignoring it, or by amosingReviewing Meots Events
196
themselves a its pretentious expente. Yet its intemuptiveness
may crete & heightened atention to the situation i interapt,
exposing the norms of daily ie as superficial, abitary, of
unfounded. Audiences are aware ofthe constructed character of
he even, but the contruction may ceveal that hee own eality
‘sala relative, «constriction in tow ight
5. The event nate an upeurge of ellow feeling, an epidemic
of cormmnitas. Family Gee and friendships are reactivated
People telephone and visit eachother to comment onthe event;
they make plans to view together. As in religious celbrations
(or quase-cligious celebrations such at Thanksgiving), pies
are ouganized, reuniting families, fiends, and neighbors. The
event serves a pretext for putting an end to longstanding
tivalies and feuds. Often, and despite the usual presence of
Crowds on test ofthe even, there isa decreage in criminally
CGastomary forms of entertainment are neglected or shunned.
6, Ths, the event connects center and periphery, not ony
through the expeence of communitas, but through direct om
‘manion with cental symbols nd valves, through the asump-
tion of ritual eoes ina ceremony conducted by establishment
leaders, and though the presence af small groups of nown and
valued others Linked by networks of long seaching ani, the
‘mass audiences of television events patialy overcome thet di
persion and stomization
7. Media events offer moments of ‘mechanical solidarity” A
comiaqence ofthe new model of public ceremony is thatthe
‘whole of population i allowed—and expected —to ated. As
‘opposed to many tribal ceremonies, ot royal pogeses, oF
¥en tothe reatvly recent example of Lincoln’ funeral in
ineteenth-centry America the event can neither be declared
of limits to any willing participants nor made-up of diferent
Psentations to diferent segments ofthe public* The event
Reviewine Meoia Events
197
offer, and afirms, shared membenhip in national or inter.
‘national communi.
"The ceremonial of medi events embraces ene societies,
and sometimes the globe Al those within rach of television
Set ae sialtaneousy and equally exposed and they share the
Snowledge that everbody else is too. Technology her allows
the spit of communitas to overcome the divisions inherent in
“organic elder.” Durkhemians would agre thatthe one i
prerequisite tothe other
8. Media events hove the power fo redefine the boundarin of
Locieten, They can determine with which eters we will share
‘an experience. One of the suongest eects of media evens is
immanent to their performance: i consists in the mapping of
new constituencies (by linking the TV networks of Ireland
Egypt for Sadat vist, for example) ov in the eeactvating of
‘obsolete constituencies (as when the broadest of the royal wed
ding momentarily revived the Bitch Empire, just asthe Popes
televised vst revived dreams ofa European Poland. Indeed, the
social formations integrated by media evens ofen are their own
creations, Such ceremonies are fragments ofthe cil tlgian of
polities that may exist ony forthe duaton ofthe broadcast
‘More than retrospective celebrations ofthe symbols that are con
tel to the identity of an extant society, some events ate bets
the advent of rome ft society?
'9, The sucess of an event ia cathartic experience for viewer
‘Medi events respond t needs that are fll bythe viewers"
conscioumess of the sheer sive of the audience and by the
oceanic” feeling of being immesed init. These needs are also
fale by the ceremonial peogesion af scenario which aes
viewers trough the many steps that lead fom a criss, tual or
slveacled, to proposed solution—oras Lévi-Strauss would put
it the “aesthetic resolution” of myth, Ducumented by a whaleRewewine Meoia Events
195
ary of sides, the cathartic efctivenet of Job Kennedys
faneral owed much to its symbolism, staging, and timing. The
faneral was able to provide an aesthetic sense of completion,
feng ¢ response to many dae of taro.
10. The attudes engendered in secondary audiences reach
beyond the cognitive, sometimes triggering syrpathtic interest
inthe ways in which other people rejoice, mou, play. or pay.
The empathic experience which media events engender—shring
“anaher nations inner eng, 35 nthe Kenedy funeral or the
royal weding—may be counted strong eects. Until now, only
ect personal contac of the sort that characterizes wat, colo
als, and ours induced this kind of intimacy
‘Outside Effects on Institutions
To ases the impact of the gens, we ak how the punctuation
of ou lives bya regular st of momentous ceremonies, broad-
cast ive and in teal time, might fet not the immediate con
teat in which cach event takes place but societal insittions
more generally. For example, it is sid of the novel that it
‘changed the composition ofthe reading publi, created. new
forms of book distebution, portrayed a certain picture of the
social classes, gave voice to suppressed mation, and contibe
ted to the emergence of individvalism and the liberation of
women. This is different, of course, fiom saying that Hasiet
Beecher Stowe’ novel wat contbuting cause ofthe Civil War
and the libeation of black slaves inthe Amentcan South. Both
of theae are ouside ellots—one generic, the other specif
‘We shall proceed telegraphic, as before, to outline a vai-
ty officcs ofthe medi-events gene as documented in exer
‘pats ofthis book. Widening the spectrum, ve examine generic
25 well as specific efets on public opinion and on the insite
tional realms of polite, diplomacy, fal, leisure, eligin,
Reviewine Meoin Events,
19
clletve memory. We conclude at our own doortep, 2010
speak, with a consideration of how the genre has afected the
ssthtics of public ceremonies
Effects on Pubic Opinion
1. Inthe ey of public opinion, media events confer status om
the institutions with which they dal. Thus spt and athletes
ae reinforced by the Olympie Cares the royal wedding gave a
new luster to monarchy; the Watergate hearing gave new Pro-
Inence tthe legiaive branch of government. NASA and the
svocates of technologial innovations were strengthened bythe
succes af the Apollo pragra an severely weakened by te lve
coverage ofthe Challenger accident." Functioning san oficial
“ealing card,” the event led to reconsidered attitudes, The
Apollo moon landings were accepted by world opinion as
renewed prof of American technological peo
2. Melia evens fcus publi opinion and activate debate on
2 given sue or set of ives, although not al sides benef from
equal attention. Media evens seck to enroll support but they
alo atact opposition. Their agenda-setting power acts hike 2
magnet, gihering protests and demonstaions. The attention
lavished on them makes therm ideal targets fr terrorist
3. Thus, madia events may act public opinion by encour-
aging oF inhibiting the expresion of reference, value, oF
bli. On the one hand, media events tend to inhibit manies
tation perceived as haste tothe values conveyed bythe event.
‘Typically, potential disentereareotaczed. Sometimes, how
ver, an event may also unwind the “ial of silence,” feng
the expresion of previously unpopular atitudes on given tues,
‘The papal vst to Latin America, for example stimulated 2
Arr of proclamations by theologian of Hbeation
44 Media evens may ulin attitude change of major mag-Reviewinc MEDIA Events
20
nitude, a8 evidenced in Sadat veveral of the Isaei appeal
of Egypt warlike intentions. Less dematic but no les pervasive
waste influence of the Watergate hearings on American opin-
ion toward Richa Nixon, ‘The impact was such that legitc
mized the ute of adil procedure aginst recently eles
president and made impeachment conceivable
5 Certain events ertallize latent tends in public opinion,
_iving ce to formerly inarticulate ordomant proposal. Th,
‘Sadats vt Jerusalem reactivated a longslenced sei with
for peaceful integration in the Middle East and almost sue
ceeded in achieving it; John Paul Is tip to Poland reamed
the cently of a Catholicism which had been speaking in
whispers Simla, the faneral of Enrico Beringer confirmed
the depiee of recognition and widespread legitimacy alxined by
the Talian Communist party within the national consensus,
while the Watergate hearings revealed a convergence between
tadical movements on the one hand andthe silent msionty on
the other. Mia events thus legitimize groups whose goal are
aligned with the occasion, even though in the cae of "teansor
tative” events these groups may previously have been litle
own ot heard,
6, Besides coalescing subteranean trends and allowing the
‘emergence of latent consensus, media events may soetines
serve as catalyats to unexpected socal movements. Something
Tike this took place in Easter Europe, when television con-
firmed the legitimacy of opposition in. Ceechealovakia and
Romania. And it took place in the family reunion event in
South Korea: starting at brosdcat commemoration ofthe war
between the Koreas, the event was apd taken over by its aud
ence, who reseriped it into a huge campaign aived at reuniting
famulies whose members had been dipered by the war.
"Through 2 spontaneous collective agreement, the commemo-
ration of wounds was ened into healing ital.
Reviewing Meoia Events
201
7. Melia events afect the international image of the society
in which they take place, Suc evens increasingly eck an iter-
‘atonal audience, and are designed to be seen beyond the
‘atonal boundaries aswell. For a given society, an event ofthis
‘ype isa “cultural performance,” in Milton Singers sense, of
ing the opportunity ofa solemn “preentaton of sell to oer
sorictics Major media evens thus picture socetit a those
‘moments when their actual practice and explicit ideals eoin-
ie,
fects on Poltical Institutions
1, Maia event sailize citizens tothe political structure of
saciaty, Olympic Games, Miss America contest, politcal con
‘entons, andthe urban marathon races sy something about
the structure ofthe societies that engendered ther, no les than
Memorial Day in Yankee City displayed the town's clas and
fratenal composition, the reviewing tnd in Moscow on May
Day diplayed the hierarchy of Soviet power, and the pli dis
plays the boroughs of medieval Siena. AS “eultural perfor
rmances” these happenings may symbolically emit social ele
ments that stand outside the consensus, as Lukes (1975) has
noted, But they ae nonetheless instructive ofthe order of soe
‘ty—including omisiony—and sometimes they give genuine
insight into the workings of the stem, as did the Watergate
hearings, the Tran-conta hearings, election night igs, or the
Indira Gandhi funeral.” The live broadcasts of political debate
in Pago, in the very inde of revolution, foretold the change
that was infact already in progres.
2. Media events reinforce the stat of leaders. Presidents and
prime minisers are tobe seen and heaed not nly in politcal
onventions or summit meetings, but a Olympic Games, dur-
ing moon landings, and soon. ‘Te result, onthe whole, is toRewewunc Meots Events
202
‘enhance the personalization of pelts and to asclate leader
‘hip with consensual causes." Sometimes, a jn 1989 Ceecho-
slovakia and Romania, new leaders are put on display.
3. Media events diplace intemediarie. ” The cumulative
ct of sch event isto downplay the roles of intermediaries
and subordinate-—even those instrumental in organizing the
frent—but especialy to weaken paiiamens, Charles de
Gaulle, with ie fae for events and hie fondness fr reerene
dure consultations, often stretched French democracy into
2 dialogue between himself and a public whom he addesed
directly, and fom whom he expected equally unmediated
response. Inatittionalied cepreentaton is short-circuited
thereby, leading to a potentially dangerous concentation of
power and to an inflated image of unanimous fllowership,
Indeed, the dangers ofthe “imperial presidency" ae what the
‘Watergate eatngs were about. In tht cate a lest, Congress
sed the gene ie to stage its own event in reasetion ofits
mediating ole
4, Dirt access to top leaders tnds to reduce the operation of
selectivity in exposure to political communications. Belore the
cof lve political broncating, citizens exposed themicles
‘much more selectively to their “owa” side. We have sid that
‘media events promote consensual polities, but when the event
is contessuch as presidental debate ora politcal party
convention—the citizen i ikely to give equal attention to both
‘eontestanis, a an ideal democratic polity would hope. Some
Scholars believe, however, that such balanced preseiation—
indeed, the politcal balance of television news altogether —
vod to tun citizens into apolitieal spectators."
5. The organizational farms of pois av affcted by media
vents, Poitial earpaignin, of course, has moved into the
television studio bt litle oft tates the frm of live event
withthe major exception of presidential debates and political
Reviewinie Meors Evens
203
‘conventions. The live reporting of apolitical convention abal=
ies the architecture of the convention hal it pves atleast as
rmvch attention, perhape mot, to what is happening in the
wings and onthe floor a fo what is happening on the strum.
‘Television journalists also anticipate draematic disclosures and
set a provocsteurs. The highlight of the Republican conven-
tion of 1950 war a ive barpaining sesion between candidate
Ronald Reagan and former president Gerald Ford, who was
sven the opprtunty of publicly delterating—before the tele-
tislon audience, not the plenum ofthe convention—the con
Uitions under which he would agree to accept a coprsidency
arrangement. The 1988 campaign featured @ spontaneous
debate between newacarter Dan Rather and the Republican ean-
date forthe vice presidency. Similar bargaining sometimes
‘hacactrize the live broadcats of election turns. Responding
to televised projections ofthe vet long before they ate officially
valkated, party tepesentatives in Ine, for example, have
ometimes entered into “asi” coalitions before the mast eee
tion-night audience (Levin, 1982)”
(6 Same media events lead dirmctly to social and political
change. Ultiately, one can edt the Camp David peace tls
(although they almost filed) and the weivigoration of the peace
‘movement tthe impact of Sadat visit to Jerusalem; one can
trace the rise of the Polish workers movement Solidarity tothe
Popet vt The demand forthe liberalization of Kore, and for
progress toad its reunification, may be connected to the fam-
iy reanion marathon." Televison contbuted to the velvet
zation of the Grech revolution,
7, Media events Breed the expectation of openness in politics
and diplomacy. Even if their continuation was delayed for sia
teen year, the fist television debates which opposed Kennedy
to Nivon in 1960 put steady pressure onthe political sytem to
ange for similar confrontations between the major candReviewing Meoia Events
2
date. Moreover, the institution of five televised debates has
been exported to other counticeeven reluctantly democratic
‘ones if the confrontation between candidates in an election
‘campaign were an intrinsic part ofthe television itl. The most
“open events im our corps are the live broadasts fim the
Eastem European revolutions of 1969
8. The live broadcasting of media events con integrate
nations. As media entertainment become:
erecsngly 66
mented ~as cable, satellite, and computer technologies mult
ply the numberof channels and diversify choice—the integra
tive role ofthe electronic medi wll tend to wane, The desire
to give expression to national belongingnet, howevcr, and
desi for seme shared experince of he “centr” wil be fl 3t
‘vatous levels of the polity. Radi played this role unt it was
supenedal by television. As television goer the way of rao,
‘media evens wil om time to ime, sound a call for undivided
attention,
Effects on Diplomacy
|. Media events abet summitry and lke national and local
polities, diplomacy b thereby infected by the peronaliation
Of power, Medin eventr—as Abba Eban sys—short-cicait
existing diplomatic channels. Ambassadors are made redun-
dant, their oe trivialized. Nowadays they may often be reuced
{to warming vsing statesmen against breaches of local etiquette
and cultural faux ps
2. The pressure of media events on diplomacy ito go publi
However public, the miepplied“patamentarianian” of inter
national assemblies prevents the exercise of diplomacy by
replacing dialogue or negation with harangues aimed a con-
sents back home and sured majorities. Bat what takes place
‘in media events seems afar ey fom international execies in
Reviewing MEDIA Events
205
name-calling, Public exhortations presure negotiators into not
slamming doors. Losing face consists in failing to emerge with
‘postive statement. The dma of diplomatic media evens i
tone of overcoming diferences. When all else has failed, media
‘iene may succeed in breaking diplomatie deadlocks or in sur-
‘mounting stalemates by creating 3 climate conducive to nego-
tation, one in which the pubic signal its anticipation of ree
onciation
5. Media events erate @ new resource for diplomacy. The
diplomacy of gesture may have the power to create a favorable
timate fora contactor to seal 2 bargain. Gestures cannot
replace negotiation; indeed, they themselves are often the result
af arduous negotiation. An “open” negotiator is contronted with
the impossible tsk of addressing his own condtuency tock
home, his partners constituency, and, lst but nat least, wold
public opinion-—all at the same time. And yet it can be done;
the fact that media events manage to deliver diferent messages
simultaneously. Their power in dificlt of blocked situations