Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IfAR
OR
IS IT
O
:I^I---LOYED
TWO.
CORRECT?
CORRECT.
O
A
YES, SIR.
SCME SORT OF
IS
]NVOLVED IN
UNDERSTAND SHE
CORRECT.
SAW
MS. LYNCH
BEFORE TODAY?
,:
WAS
I THINK IT
WAS 2OO4 OR
?nn5
-:
THAT TIME?
-a
1J
]T
NO.
OR STOLEN ANYTHING
NOW,
AGAIN.
:A
25
YOU OBTAINED
MS.
LYNCH
SOME
26
LI
HERE
Z6
CORRECT.
IN
CALIFORNIA?
CORRECT?
YES/ S]R.
GOT
20
YEAR OR TWO.
2
3
TS IT
EMPLOYED BY YOU AS
CORRECT.
O
A
4
5
YES, SIR.
SOME SORT OF
IS
INVOLVED IN
IRS?
10
11
UNDERSTAND SHE
72
13
oWHENWASTHELASTTIMETHATYoUSAWMS.LYNCH
CORRECT.
14
BEFORE TODAY?
15
l6
l1
2005.
18
THAT TIME?
WAS
NO.
2A
OR STOLEN ANYTHING
2t
O
A
22
NOW,
2b
25
ZO
)7
2B
WAS 2OO4 OR
OHASSHEVANDAL]ZEDANYoF.YOURPROPERTYDURING
19
ZJ
I THINK IT
IT
THERE. tr
AGAIN.
:.:
YOU OBTAINED
MS. LYNCH
SOME
CORRECT?
O
A
HERE
IN
CORRECT.
CALIFORNIA?
GOT
ZL
WAS
THAT
IT EXPIRED, YES.
A RESTRAINING
YOU SUBSEQUENTLY OBTAINED
O
IS THAT
THE STATE OF COLORADO;
AGAINST MS. LYNCH IN
ORDER
CORRECT?
CORRECT.
RESTRAINING ORDER
_0
CALIEORNIA AGAIN/
IN
THAT
CORRECT?
COLORADO V{AS GRANTED'
CORRECT.
CORRECT.
13
NOW,
:4
CORRECT?
15
L6
-2
T1
AT THE TIME
_1
IN
COURT
NEW RESTRAINING
COB'RECT?
WAS NOT IN
AT THAT TIME' MS' LYNCH
COURT'
WASN'T THERE'
IN
ASSUMES FACTS NOT
EVIDENCE.
20
THECOURT:IT'SCROSS_EXAMINATION.HECANLEADTHE
NOT IN EVIDENCE' A
MATTER OE AN ISSUE
A
NOT
IT,S
WITNESS.
IE HE KNEW
HE,S ASKING THE WITNESS
EVIDENCE'
IN
NOT
EACT
2t
IETHEDTFENDANTWASINCUSTODYWHENTHECOURTSIGNEDTHE
22
ORDER OR WAS
1B
19
IT
23
2*
YOUR
MR. PERRONI: THANK YOU'
25
26
2B
EXCUSE ME.
MAY
2'1
I,LL
HEAR
HONOR'
SUGGEST
IF
A SPECIFIC ANSWER'
WHENEVER
22
ASSERTIONANDTHENSAY/''ISTHATCORRECT?''THEWITNESS
SAYS, ,,NO," I DONIT
KNOW WHAT
IS
THE FACT
BECAUSE HEIS
THAT CORRECT.
IS
HAVE
STATEMENT
IN
YOUR
HAVEToASSUMESHEWASINCOURT.DoYoUGETTHEPOINT?
MR. PERRONI: I DO, YOUR HONOR' I APOLOGIZE'
THECOURT:NoW,ASKDIRECTQUESTIONSRATHERTHAN
_0
THAT
CORRECT.IEHESAYSNo,YOURASSERTIONISINCORRECT.
ALL RIGHT.
i1
MR.PERRONI:SHOULDIWAITFoRMS.STREETERToCOME
L2
13
fS
BACK?
THECOURT:No/fDON'TKNOWWHERESHE'SGO]NG.
74
15
(MS. STREETER
T6
REAPPEARS.
L1
1B
BY MR. PERRONI:
I9
20
OWEREYoUPRESENTWHENTHERESTRAININGORDER
HERE
IN CALIEORNIA,
IT.
2L
22
24*
25
23
26
21
aa
RECEIVED
IN
I SSUED
WAS NOT
IN
COURT.
]S
THE ANSWER.
BY MR. PERRONI:
OSoSOMEBODYTOLDYoUTHATARESTRAININGORDER
HAD BEEN ISSUED?
23
YES.
O
A
aTHATTHEYTOLDYoUWASARESTRAININGORDER?
DOCUMENTATION.
1
2
A PIECE OE PAPER?
YES/ IT
't
RESTRAINING
COPY OF THE
ORDER?
THECOURT:WELL,WHYDON'TYoULETMEKNOWWHATIT
10
11
IS,ANDI,LLTAKEJUDICIALNOTICEoFANYTHINGINTHE
t2
EILE.
13
t5
MR.PERRONI:IDON'TBELIEVETHERE'SACOPYoFIT
IN THE EILE. THEREIS A NUMBER.
MS. STREETER: ]E YOU LOOK iT IT'S IN THE POLICE
L'7
REPORT,IT,STNTHEDOCUMENTWITHTHEPOLICEREPORT.
74
15
THECOURT:MA'AM,IDON'THAVEAPOLICEREPoRTIN
1B
THEFILE.THEPOLICEREPORTDOESNoTBELONGINTHEFILE.
I
THE COURT RECORDS ARE IN THE FILE' AND ALL
19
20
2I
EINDISANORIG]NALCOMPLAINTANDANAMENDEDCOMPLAINT.
HERE'S A COPY OE A PROTECT]VE ORDER IN THE FILE'
22
ALL RIGHT.
23
24
25
THIS
CASE.
/6
21
THE COURT:
2B
MR. PERRONI: IT
WHAT?
WAS
PRETRIAL PROTECTIVE
ORDER
******"*a*fl
24
MS. STREETER IS
IT ]S
REEERENC]NG.
THECOURT:WELL,IFfT'SNoTSOMETHINGTHATTHIS
IS
TO/
REFERRING
WITNESS
THE
COPY OE
ORDER?
MS.STREETER:MYUNDERSTANDINGISTHATPERHAPSTHE
JUDICIAL ASSISTANT HAS THE POLICE COPIES OF THE POLICE
10
11
72
13
76
]S A
L4
15
SEE
MS. LYNCH.
MR.COHENHASAPERMANENTRESTRAININGORDER
1B
OE
THAT WAS GRANTED BY THE STATE OE CALIEORNIA AND AS PART
THE UNIEORM ACT WHEN A PERSON MOVES/ THEY HAVE TO REGISTER
t9
20
CALIFORNIA ORDER
2L
7'7
22
]S
IN
THE NEW
MERELY
STATE.
SO THE
REGISTRAT]ON OF THE
COLORADO
AS I
23
VOLUMINOUS ON
2L
25
26
2'7
CANGoREALQUICKLYANDGETTHEME,oRTHECOURT.
2B
THECOURT:IETHEE_MAILSTHEMSELVESMAYCONSTITUTE
25
, SUBDIVISION
THAT
]S
(B)
NOW
213.6(A)
WHICH CHARGES
A VIOLATION
OF
ORDER,
HAPPENS HARDLY.
10
11
COMMUNITY
L2
13
t4
TO HAVE
15
IN
THE
A BRIEE RECESS/ ]
]F I
FROM
COULD BE ALLOWED
16
OEFER
L1
1B
L9
20
27
22
23
.A
Zq
PERMANENT.
21
2B
WHERE SHE
IN THE CALIFORN]A
IS
MENTIONING
IS
MERELY
25
ZO
AT THE
IT
YOUR
EROM THE
RESTRAINING ORDER.
?ERMANENT
THE
THE
COURT:
NO.
HOW LONG
l
Mq
THE
THEN
IT.
I ' LL
TAKE
RECESS
IN THIS
MATTER UNTIL
YOU GET
NoTTRYINGTHISCASE.ITISNoTNECESSARYToPROVEALLoF
i0
THECRIMESTHATAREALLEGEDBECAUSETHEYAREREPETITIOUS
11
CONDUCTOVERALENGTHYPERIODoETIME,BUTIEoNTHEBASIS
AND THE NUMBERS THAT
OF THESE E_MAILS THEMSELVES
RECEIVED THAT EXHIBIT
WITNESS HAS TOLD ME HE HAS
1/)
LL
13
T4
15
76
L'l
IH
THE
FOR
IN TWO DAYS
IDENTIEICATION HE SAID ARRIVED
SIR?
THE WITNESS: THAT IS CORRECT,
KIND OF ANNOYING TO
THE COURT: __ THAT WOULD BE
WITH THAT ' LET ' S JUST LEAVE
YOUR COMPUTER EILLED UP
HAVE
TTT AT
THAT. LET'S
NoWTHEWITNESSHASALREADYTESTIEIEDToTHOSE
'1 0
20
PORTIONSTHATHEREADINTHECOMPLAINTWHICHHECONSTRUED
2L
22
23
24
)\
--e
SUBJ.ECT ?
26
Mq
STREETER:
2'1
THE
2B
MR.
COHEN,
'
QUESTION'
BELIEVING
DO YOU HAVE ANY BASIS FOR
21
THATTHISLADYREALLYMEANTToDoYoUHARMoRMEANSToDo
YOU HARM?
SIR,
THE WITNESS: SHE STATES SO OVER AND OVER,
3
4
fLJ.
THECOURT:ANDYoUACTUALLYSAYYoUHAVELOSSPEACE
OE MIND.
o
U
IN
ARE YOU
10
THE WITNESS:
l_1
THECOURT:DoYoUNEEDToEXPLAINTHATANSWER?
L2
13
L4
THEWITNESS:IHAVEGRANDCHILDRENPLAYINGoNMY
EEAR?
SIR,
MAY
IS
I SPEAK?
YES.
YOUR EXPLANATION?
15
FRONTLAWN.IRECEIVEPHoNECALLSTHATARECHILLING.MY
L6
THECOURT:DON'TTELLMEWHATYOURATTORNEY
L'l
RECEIVES. THAT
t_B
WOULD
BE HEARSAY.
THEWITNESS:IRECEIVEPHONECALLSTHATARESLURRED
79
20
THATAREINELICTEDWITHALCOHOL/THATAREUGLY,THATARE
2L
MENACING,ANATMOSPHEREOVERTHEPASTSIxYEARSoE15To
22
20 E-MATLS A
23
24
25
26
{t
HUMILIATEME,VOWINGToBRINGMEToSOMESORToFFICTIOUS
JUSTICESHE,SCONSTRUED]DESERVE.YES/THATCREATESAN
ATMOSPHERE
OF EEAR.
2'l
IS
2B
MS. STREETER:
YES.
THIS
GENTLEMEN IS
IN THE PROCESS OE
CROSS-EXAMINATION.
THE COURT:
ALL
RIGHT.
I'VEJUSTBEENDIVERTEDFROMTHEFACTSTHAT
ARE TO BE RESOLVED AT THIS TIME.
MOVE
IT
ON.
DOWN'
'_1
_5
MS. STREETER:
!6
!1
1B
THECoURT:AREYoUGOINGToOEEERANYDEFENSE?
L9
THANK YOU.
THINK
20
ARECLEARTHATWEAREASKINGEoRHERToBERELEASED,
2L
DON,TKNOWIEYOUWANTAgllMOTION?ICANMAKEONE
22
WE
AND
AS
TO
A 911 MOTION?
23
24
MR.PERRONI:ITISLIKEAgg5FoRMISDEMEANORSAT
26
ARRAIGNMENT.IFTHEYAREINCUSTODYYoUDECIDEWHETHERoR
ANY NEW
NOT THERE'S REASONABLE CAUSE THAT SHE'S COMMITTED
2'7
AMENDED COUNTS.
25
2B
]T
MUCH
IN
HER.T '