Exhibit to State's Response to motion to dismiss. The IL State Police Lab reports no gunshot residue found on Richard Wanke's hands, clothing, or van he drove the day of Attorney Greg Clark's murder.
Also no DNA connecting Richard Wanke to any evidence seized in connection with the murder investigation.
Exhibit to State's Response to motion to dismiss. The IL State Police Lab reports no gunshot residue found on Richard Wanke's hands, clothing, or van he drove the day of Attorney Greg Clark's murder.
Also no DNA connecting Richard Wanke to any evidence seized in connection with the murder investigation.
Exhibit to State's Response to motion to dismiss. The IL State Police Lab reports no gunshot residue found on Richard Wanke's hands, clothing, or van he drove the day of Attorney Greg Clark's murder.
Also no DNA connecting Richard Wanke to any evidence seized in connection with the murder investigation.
=
7 08-0/(a9
. ILLINOIS STATE POLICE / ofS
Division of Forensic Services
Forensic Science Center at Chicago
1941 Se eee
G12) 43: )* om
Blagoj G, Trent
Rod R. Blagojevich December 10, 2008 as
LABORATORY REPORT
DET. REGEZ
ROCKFORD PD
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
420 WEST STATE STREET
ROCKFORD, IL. 61101
Case #R08-000815
“Agency Case # 08-016204
‘SUPPLEMENTAL.
OFFENSE = Murder
SUSPECT Richard E. Wanke
VICTIM — Gregory H. Clark
“The following evidence was received by the Forensic Science Center at Chicago on February 15,2008:
6A ‘One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the ‘Exhibit 6A contains particles characteristic of
‘background samples.
upper lid of cap.
e ‘One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the Exhibit 6B contains particles characteristic of
lower id of cap. background samples:
6 One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the Exhibit 6C contains particles characteristic of
‘outside of cap. background samples.
o (One (1) SEM/GSR room control Exhibit 6D is similar to an adhesive blank.
sample.
‘The following evidence was received by the Forensic Science Center at Chicago on October 10, 2008:
EXBIEIT, «= DESCRIPTION EINDINGS
7 ‘One (1) sealed bag identified es PGSR samples were taken and examined by
containing a pair of jeans. ‘scanning electron microscopy.
7% One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the Exhibit 7B contains particles characteristic of
inside front right pocket. ‘background samples.
7 ‘One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the ‘Exhibit 7C contains particles characteristic of
inside front left pocket. background samples.
People vs. Richard Wanke
2oracroz2
Wea, Rhrd creat
Response Exhit. 08- O16 20F
ROCKFORD PD at
Laboratory Case #R08-000815 2 December 10, 2008
EXHIBIT. «—- DESCRIPTION
D One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the
inside back right pocket.
e One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the Exhibit 7E contains particles charactecistic of
inside back left pocket. background samples.
® One (1) SEM/GSR room control Exhibit 7F is similar to an adhesive blank.
‘sample.
‘The following evidence was received by the Forensic Science Center at Chicago on October 10, 2008:
DESCRIPTION ENDINGS
Bae seed ag ied as PGSR samples were taken snd examined by
containing a black denim jacket. scanning electron niicroscopy.
‘The following evidence was received by the Forensic Science Ceater at Chicago on February 15, 2008:
EXT. §=— DESCRIPTION. ENDINGS
9A ‘One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the Exhibit 9A contains particles characteristic of
Tight cuff of jacket. background samples.
3B One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the Exhibit 9B contains particles characteristic of
Jef cuff of jacket. background samples,
9c One (1) SEM/GSR room control Exhibit 9C is similar to an adhesive blank.
sample.
‘The following evidence was received by the Forensic Science Center at Chicago on October 10, 2008:
EBT EINDINGS
SB One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the Exhibit 9E contains particles characteristic of
inside right pocket. background samples.
oF ‘One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the Exhibit 9F contains particles characteristic of
inside left pocket. background samples.
98 One (1) SEM/GSR room contro! Exhibit 9G is similar to an adhesive blank.
sample,
‘The following evidence was received by the Forensic Science Center at Chicago on October 10, 2008:
EXGIEIT. =— DESCRIPTION EINDINGS:
10 One (1) sealed bag identified as PGSR samples were taken.
‘containing clothes recovered from
Richard Wanke.| - 08-616 a
- pockrorn 3 of
aoe rea #ROt-000815 3. December 10,2008
EXHIBIT «—DESCRIPTION ENDINGS
10A (One (1) sealed bag identified as ‘Two (2) samples were examined by scanning
electron microscopy.
containing a pair of black gloves
recovered from Richard Wanke.
101 ‘One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the Previously examined.
tight glove.
: 1OAIA _—_One(1) SEM/GSR sample fromthe Exhibit 101A contains particles characteristic
inside back of right glove. of background samples.
10a2 ‘One(1) SEM/GSR sample from the Previously examined.
Tet glove.
Hl
10A2A One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the Exhibit 10A2A contin prices characterise :
inside back left glove. of beckground samples.
103, ‘One (1) SEM/GSR room coatro! Previously examined. i
ome |
148 One (1) sealed bag identified as Not examined. !
. containing a "RVC Tennis" jacket
recovered from Richard Wanke. |
“0c (One (1) sealed bag identified as ‘Not examined. i
‘containing 4 pair of tan pants recovered a
‘Wanke. !
10D Not éxamined. |
108 One (1) sealed ba identified as Not examined. |
a black long sleeve t-shirt
recovered from Richard Wanke. {
10F ‘One (1) sealed bag identified as ‘Not examined. !
cootaining a dask blve/pray jacket |
recovered from Richard Wanke. 1
106 One (1) sealed bag identified a5 Not examined.
containing a pair of black boots
recovered from Richard Wanke.
10H ‘One (1) sealed bag identified as ‘Not examined.
ing a pair of thermal underwear
recovered from Richard Wanke.
Wark, Richa oy* ROCKFORD PD
‘Laboratory Case #R08-000815 +
DESCRIPTION
(One (1) sealed bag identified as
contin ry hat recovered om
One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the
outside im of hat.
‘One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the
inside rim of bat,
One (1) SEM/GSR room contro!
sample.
One (1) sealed bag identified
08- d)b204
ARG
December 10, 2008
Fase pes were take and cane! by
scanning electron microscopy.
Exhibit 1011 contains particles charmcteristic of
background samples.
Exhibit 1012 contains particles charecteitic of
beckground samples,
‘Exhibit 1013 is similar to an adhesive blank.
PGSR samples were taken and examined by
aera Bogle Boye dai seanning electron microscopy.
‘The following evidence was received by the Forensic Science Center at Chicago on February 29, 2008:
exer
15A
1B
isc
DESCRIPTION
One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the
‘Tight cuff of jacket.
One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the
left cuff of jacket.
‘One (1) SEM/GSR room control
sample.
ne 15A contains particles characteristic of
background samples.
Exhibit 15B contains particles characteristic of
‘background samples.
Exhibit 15C is similar to an adhesive blank,
‘The following evidence was received. by the Forensic Science Center at Chicago on October 10, 2008:
EXHIBIT.
1SE,
DESCRIPTION
ue SERCO seme from the
interior right inside pocket.
One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the
interior left inside pocket.
One (1) SEM/GSR room control
sample.
‘One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the
exterior right inside bottom pocket.
oro
ENDINGS:
Exhibit 15E contains particles characteristic of
‘background samples,
Exhibit 1SF contains particles characteristic of B
background samples, |
Exhibit 15G is similar to an adhesive blank. !
Exhibit 1SH contains pantcles characteristic of |
background samples.
00787* ROCKFORD PD
‘Laboratory Case #8 08-000815 *
DESCRIPTION
ae (One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the
exterior lef inside bottom pocket.
DS olbro4
5 kG
December 10, 2008
‘Exhibit 151 contains particles characteristic of
‘background samples.
‘The following evidence was received by the Forensic Science Center at Chicago on October 10, 2008:
DESCRIPTION
ue 1) sealed bg identified ws
containing # black wash cloth.
One (1) sealed bag identified es
containing a pair of gloves.
(One (1) sealed bag identified as
containing a right glove.
One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the
‘outside back of glove.
‘One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the
inside back of glove.
(One (1) SEM/GSR room control
sample,
One (1) swabbing of glove.
One sealed agente at
containing a left,
One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the
outside back of glove.
oe (1) SEM/GSR spe fom he
inside back of glove.
‘One (1) swabbing of glove.
One (1) sealed bag identified as
swabbings of vehicle.
‘One (1) sealed bag identified as
‘containing a seat swabbing recovered
from a vehicle,
EINDINGS
Not examined.
PSR samples were taken,
PGSR samples were examined by scanaing
electron microscopy.
Exhibit 18A1 contains particles characteristic of
background samples,
Exhibit 18A2 contains particles characteristic of
background samples.
Exhibit 183 is similar to an adhesive blank.
‘Not examined.
PGSR samples were examined by scanning
electron microscopy.
Exhibit 18B1 contains particles characteristic of
background samples.
Exhibit 18B2 contains particles characteristic of
background samples.
Not examined.
GSR samples were taken.
PGSR samples were examined by scanning
electron microscopy.* ROCKFORD PD
Laboratory Case #RO8-000815. 6
EXHIBIT. — DESCRIPTION
AL ‘One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the
seat swabbing.
1942 One (1) SEM/GSR room coatrol
sample.
198 One (1) sealed bag identified as
containing a seat belt swabbing
recovered from a vehicle,
19B1 One (1) SEM/GSR sample from the
seat belt swab.
OB-olb04
ote
December 10, 2008
HINDINGS
Exhibit 19A1 contains particles characteristic of
background samples.
Exhibit 19A2 is similar to an adhesive blank.
PGSR sample was examined by scanning
electron microscopy.
‘Exhibit 1981 contains particles characteristic of
background samples.
CONCLUSIONS:
‘The results of Exhibits 6A through 6D, 7, 9, 10A, 101, 15, 18 and 19 indicate that the sampled arces may
‘ot have contacted a PGSR related item or may not have been in the environment of a discharged firearm.
Ifthey were, then the particles were not deposited, were removed by activity, or were not detected by the
‘Please aoe this analyst's report dated Merch 1, 2008.
EVIDENCE DISPOSITION:
‘The above exhibits will be returned to the submitting agency.
00789