Professional Documents
Culture Documents
April 1, 2007
Helena—History 10b
Compare and contrast Mazzini’s and Cavour’s plans for unifying Italy. How did they plan
to accomplish this goal? How do you account for their differences?
During the mid-1800s, two notable Italian nationalists proposed disparate plans for
Italian unification. Entering the scene at the height of the Enlightenment, Giuseppe Mazzini was
focused on revolutionary ideals like individual equality and every man’s duty to ensure universal
social justice. In his treatise, The Duties of Man, Mazzini demands Italian unification on the basis
that humans are strengthened by associations such as nations. He writes, “When isolated, [man
is] inferior in strength to many animals…All the noblest aspirations of [man’s] heart, such as love
of country, and also those less virtuous, such as desire of glory and of others’ praise, indicate
[man’s] inborn tendency to unite [his] life with the life of the millions who surround [him].”2
Having justified the need for Italian nationhood, Mazzini continues to support his argument
against national class subjugation by writing that God has “plant[ed] the instinct of progress in
the heart of every man, [and] has also put into human nature the faculties and powers necessary to
fulfill it.”3 According to Mazzini, once there is no longer any class or individual subjugation,
there will be nothing left to divide the Italian people, and a national “association” (in which
With the advantage of witnessing Mazzini’s brief and unsuccessful creation of the Republic
of Rome in 1849, Camillo Benso di Cavour, Mazzini’s late contemporary, understood that social
revolutions from the bottom up (and guerilla fighting tactics like those of Mazzini’s disciple,
Giuseppe Garibaldi) were ultimately no match for more organized forces of nations like France.5
After the French intervened in Mazzini’s Republic and re-established Pope Pius IX as ruler of the
1
Kishlansky, “Civilization in the West, Vol. II,” p. 699.
2
Mazzini, “The Duties of Man,” p. 69.
3
Mazzini, p. 74.
4
Mazzini, p. 51.
5
Kishlansky, p. 699-700.
Papal States, realists like Cavour came to realize that direct popular action would never work and
“only as a unified nation could Italy lay claim to status as a great power in Europe.”6
ideals just like Mazzini had, he chose to utilize diplomacy and princely leadership instead of the
moralistic, flag-waving tactics of movements like Young Italy and the Red Shirts.
Emmanuel II (who had seized power after his father had been forced out by Austrian interference
in 1849), Camillo Cavour “undertook liberal administrative reforms that included tax reform,
stabilization of the currency, improvement of the railway system, the creation of a transatlantic
steamship system, and the support of private enterprise.”7 Recognizing that pragmatic issues like
gaps in railroad track paths between Piedmont and Lombardy and a dearth of railroads in the
Papal State of Rome created a “humiliating [sense of] inferiority” [among] numerous branches of
the great Christian family,” Cavour sought to emancipate those peopled states by using expanded
rail lines to force communication between the various Italian principalities; through this measure,
Cavour aimed to destroy the petty, municipal passions, born of ignorance and prejudice, that had
In addition to expanded communication, Cavour’s plan for Italian unification also included
partnering with stronger powers, like France, so that those powerful European nations would be
less likely to interfere with and prevent Italian states from coalescing, as they had occurred in the
past. Furthermore, these partnerships also ensured that European nations traded and
communicated with Italy (via railways), which augmented Italy’s material and moral strength as a
single nation.9
As a loyal premier to King Victor Emmanuel II, Cavour purported that loyal friends of the
country must remain loyal to the local, deep-rooted thrones of good rulers, since those rulers
6
Kishlansky, p. 710.
7
Kishlansky, p. 710.
8
Cavour, p. 47, 49, 50, 57.
9
Cavour, p. 55.
would feel a duty to lead their inherited fatherland to its highest glory.10 Thus, although Cavour
remained similar to Mazzini in his belief that no people can attain a high level of intelligence and
morality without a strong feeling of nationalism, Cavour had the advantage of learning from
Mazzini’s failed revolution, and as a result, he proposed a unification plan which accounted for
In conclusion, while both Mazzini and Cavour aimed at bolstering inter-personal relations (via
equality and duties of life) as a way to unify Italy, Cavour elaborated upon Mazzini’s Enlightened
ideas by proposing practical measures (e.g. protection against foreign interference, a source for
domestic leadership, and a means for national communication) that progressed beyond simply
10
Cavour, p. 60.
11
Cavour, p. 59.