AAAC and Whose Diversity? are writing to the University of Minnesota. The letter urges the University to drop the charges against the students. The 1969 and 2015 Morrill Hall takeovers are eerily similar, authors say.
AAAC and Whose Diversity? are writing to the University of Minnesota. The letter urges the University to drop the charges against the students. The 1969 and 2015 Morrill Hall takeovers are eerily similar, authors say.
AAAC and Whose Diversity? are writing to the University of Minnesota. The letter urges the University to drop the charges against the students. The 1969 and 2015 Morrill Hall takeovers are eerily similar, authors say.
We write this letter in solidarity with Whose Diversity?
, in their efforts to address
problems at the University of Minnesota, some of which we addressed in 1969. The issues of the development and support of academic studies that would greatly enhance the University community, to increase non-whites in the student body, as well as in faculty positions, and serious efforts to make such efforts a normal part of the Universitys mode of operation, rather than a few students having to put their careers on the line to achieve what is in the best interest of the University and the Community as a whole. We urge the University to drop the charges against the students and develop lasting mechanisms that will prevent the necessity for such student and community actions of the Morrill Hall Takeover type. The 1969 and 2015 Morrill Hall Takeovers are eerily similar. Each issued demands in the Spring, prior to the takeover, with little progress being made by the administration toward satisfying the demands. AAAC and Whose Diversity? requested and eventually did meet with the president, still getting promises without solutions. From a student perspective, inaction is compatible to dishonesty. It is in the best interest of all involved that honesty and integrity carries the day. If that is not the case, we can be assured that this is not the last time that Morrill Hall will be targeted by those students who raise moral questions about academics that are turned into political situations.