10
qt
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
STATE OF ILLINOIS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
COUNTY OF WINNEBAGO
THE PEOPLE OF THE
STATE OF ILLINOIS,
Case No. 14 CF 922
Plaintifé,
ve.
RICHARD WANKE,
Defendant.
REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS at the hearing of the
above-entitled cause before the Honorable ROSEMARY COLLINS,
Judge of said Court, on the 19th day of December, 2014.
APPEARANCES: MR. F. JAMES BRUN,
Assistant State's Attorney,
on behalf of the People;
MR. DERRICK SCHMIDT and
MS. ERIN HANNIGAN,
Assistant Public Defenders,
on behalf of the Defendant.
Sandra Brassfield, CSR
17th Judicial Circuit
Rockford, Illinois
License No. 084-00329110
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
THE COURT: No. 6, People versus Richard Wanke.
All right. This is People versus Richard
Wanke. Mr. Wanke is now in the courtroom. Good afternoon.
Would each party identify themselves then.
MR. BRUN: James Brun on behalf of the People.
MR. SCHMIDT: Good afternoon, Your Honor,
Derrick Schmidt on behalf of Mr. Wanke.
MS. HANNIGAN: Erin Hannigan on behalf of
Mr. Wanke.
THE COUR‘
: Thank you. We are here today for
continued hearing on the defendant's amended request to
remove the Winnebago County Public Defender's Office as
Defendant's counsel.
MR. BRUN: Your Honor, at the last court date
the Court asked us to locate various transcripts. At this
time, if I may approach and provide a copy to the Court.
THE COURT: All right.
MR. BRUN: I have exerts of a transcript from
06 CF 405. This is the testimony of Barbara Brown. It's
August 6th before Judge McGraw. Ms. O'Connor was present.
It does include her testimony as well as the Court's ruling,
which I believe was the flagged area.
In regards to the second transcript, I believe
it was presented by the defendant that Ms. Brown also10
a.
12
13
14
15
16
a7
18
1g
20
21
22
23
24
3
testified in 1998. I was unable to locate that transcript,
Your Honor.
THE COURT: When you say Barbara Brown, are
you also talking about Maribeth Brown?
MR. SCHMIDT: Yes.
MR. BRUN: Yes, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Okay.
MR. BRUN: And the final request that we had
discussed at the last court date was an affidavit from
Detective Whisenand, reference who was spoken to in the
public defender's office.
At this point, I did speak with Detective
Whisenand right after court. He was going to look into it.
And he did speak with me the following morning. He was
unable to determine any additional information that was
included in the reports. But he was also going to speak
with Detectives Torry Regez and David Lee.
THE COURT: Okay.
MR. BRUN: I have not received that
information back yet.
THE COURT: He does not have any personal
recollection of who it was?
MR. BRUN: No, Your Honor, he does not.
THE COURT: Okay. Counsel.10
a.
12
13
14
1s
16
a7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
MR, SCHMIDT: Yes, Your Honor. A couple of
things. That report -- the person in the public defender's
office, that was in Detective Regez's report, so that
probably would be the easiest person to talk to regarding
that matter.
Also, I was informed by Mr. Wanke that he
filed a motion to supplement Defendant's 12/12/14 motion
and 12/15/14 argument. I don't know if that made it to the
court file.
THE COURT: Well, I'm not considering any
filings that Mr. Wanke makes. So whether it's in the court
file or not is not -- the Court doesn't consider him to be
co-counsel on this case.
So if you have filings that you want to bring
to my attention, or if you want further time to review that,
you can do that. But the fact that he files motions --
MR. SCHMIDT: (Interrupting) I completely
understand that, Your Honor. However, in this case, on this
very slim issue, I have told Mr. Wanke that, you know, this
is a very personal issue and that I would let him speak on
this issue and to clear the absolute error on this issue
between me, my office, Mr. Wanke.
I don't want any stone unturned; to think, (A),
that I'm holding back on something just due to my position10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
with the office.
So I have no problem adopting Mr. Wanke's
amendment -- or a Motion to Supplement --
THE COURT: (Interrupting) I don't see anything
in the court file, so if you would -- are they typed?
MR. SCHMIDT: Yes.
THE COURT: Okay.
MR. SCHMIDT: May I approach?
THE COURT: If you want to hand them to the
Court.
MR. BRUN: And, for the record, Your Honor, I
have received, well, before coming to this courtroom, a
motion to supplement the defendant's arguments from December
12, 2014, and it does have a file stamp on it of today's date.
THE COURT: Okay.
MR. SCHMIDT: The only thing I would ask is if
that could be sealed for now. My e-mail address is on one
of the exhibits, Exhibit A. And I would ask that that be
redacted in the future since this is for -- open for the
public.
THE COURT: Redact it right now. It's not
critical to the motion.
MR. SCHMIDT: No.
THE COURT: So redact it right now, because I10
11
12
13
14
1s
16
a7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
won't seal it. So let's redact it.
And I don't know if the clerk has that or not
It does have a file stamp, but it is file stamped today.
MR. SCHMIDT: Correct.
THE COURT: I don't know that it's in the file
yet.
THE CLERK: No.
THE COURT: The clerk doesn't even have it
scanned yet.
THE CLERK: I can't get the scanner to open.
I'm sorry, Your Honor.
THE COURT: The clerk can't get even get the
scanner to open.
MR. SCHMIDT: TI understand.
THE COURT: So what I'm telling you to do --
and I have -- I will sign an order to this effect. So it's
clear, the Court is giving you permission to strike that
from the document. But you better go down to the clerk's
office and get it. Because once it's scanned, it's scanned.
MR. SCHMIDT: Yes, Your Honor, understood. As
far as the question, Your Honor's request from our office
was to speak to Mr. Doll --
THE COURT: Uh-huh (affirmative response) .
MR. SCHMIDT: (Continuing) -- deputy public10
qa
12
13
14
1s
16
17
18
19
20
22
22
23
24
defender, regarding the issue of funds and experts. And I
did speak with him regarding that issue. And his straight-
up answer was that Ms. Sorensen has two absolute functions.
One is to assign homicide cases; the other one is to
allocate the budget.
And there is no way around that; as far as Mr.
Doll cannot allocate money without going through Ms.
Sorensen which causes a, quite honestly, a huge problem as
far as experts and things like that.
I had thought that, quite honestly, they would
find a way around that, and I was surprised by the answer.
But it does not seem like there is any way around that,
just a straight answer.
So every decision we make on experts does
eventually go, as far as the money, go through Ms. Sorensen
who has been personally conflicted off the case.
THE COURT: Okay. Thank you for that
response. Anything else then?
MR. BRUN: Nothing else at this time, Your Honor.
THE COURT: All right. When do you think you'll
get that information from the officers?
MR. BRUN: Your Honor, actually before coming
to court I did try calling Detective Regez and Detective
Whisenand. I left messages on both phones but no contact10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
8
back yet. I would hope I would have it, with the holidays --
we were going to set a date. I'm not here next Monday and
Tuesday but next Friday if the Court is available.
THE COURT: I'm not here.
MR. BRUN: All right.
THE COUR’
: Okay. And, counsel, I would ask
that you get me a courtesy copy of your attachment to --
that Ms. Hannigan has in her hand; if you would get me a
courtesy copy of that.
MR. SCHMIDT: Your Honor may have that one.
THE COURT: Then go make sure you get the one
that's going to be filed.
MR. SCHMIDT: Yes.
THE COURT: All right. We'll set it over then,
give the Court a chance to review this and also hear what
other information. Well, I am going to be in trial the
fist week of January but I do think we'll be able to move
through it fairly quickly. How about Wednesday, January
7th in the afternoon, say 3:00 o'clock?
MR. SCHMIDT: I will be here.
MR. BRUN: Your Honor, I may not be available,
but I'll have Ms. Hite Ross present.
THE COURT: Okay. 3:00 o'clock then on
January 7th.10
1a
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ai
22
23
24
MR. BRUN: Thank you.
THE COURT: This is still on Defendant's
motion; time tolled.
MR. SCHMIDT: Yes, ma'am.
THE COURT: Thank you.
MR. SCHMIDT: Thank you, Your Honor.
THE COURT: That motion hasn't yet made it to
the court file yet, according to this clerk. She was able
to access it now. I don't know if it's already been filed.
Maybe you can find out.
MR. SCHMIDT: Yes, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Do you believe you'll need a
document from the Court giving you permission to delete
that information, if it's already been filed?
MR. SCHMIDT: It can't hurt. I will prepare
one.
THE COURT: January 7th. You put that wrong
on here.
MR. BRUN: Oh, I'm sorry.
THE DEFENDANT: Thank you, Your Honor.
THE COURT: Uh-huh (affirmative response) .
Thank you.10
qn
12
a)
14
1s
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
10
CERTIFICATE OF SHORTHAND REPORTER
I, Sandra Brassfield, a Certified Shorthand
Reporter in and for the State of Illinois, do hereby
certify that I reported in stenographic shorthand the
testimony given in the aforesaid cause and that the
foregoing transcript is a true and correct transcription of
my stenographic notes so taken as aforesaid and contains
all the testimony given at said cause to the best of my
ability.
I further certify that I am neither attorney or
counsel for, nor related to or employed by any of the
parties in this action, and further that I am not a
relative or employee of any attorney or counsel employed by
the parties hereto or financially interested in the action.
Dated this 13th day of Jamuary, 2015
Sandra Brassgidld, CSR
License No. 084-003291
17th Judicial Circuit
State of Illinois