The Father of Torrens System in The Philippines

ANG BAGONG LAHING PILIPINO DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC.
www.blpfoundation.org www.blptorrensystem1858.com SEC Registration No. A 200200833-2002 as amended Art. II & III Non-Government Organization
THE FATHER OF TORRENS SYSTEM IN THE PHILIPPINES

The Torrens System was introduced in the Philippines within the bounds of the Land Registration Act 496, Cadastral Act 2259, which took effect on February 1, 1903, This law was amended and superseded by P.D. No. 1529, which took effect on June 11, 1978, otherwise known as the Property Registration Decree.
Torrens Certificate of Title A certificate of title is a mere evidence of ownership; it is not the title to the land itself as the concept of title is conceived under our Civil Law; the certificate of title shall be a true copy of the decree of registration (Sec. 39, P.D. 1529)
DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES AND STATE POLICIES (ARTICLE II) R.A. 3046 as Amended by: R.A. 5446; P.D. No. 1596 and P.D. No. 1599 Section3, Art XVII. The state shall encourage Non-government, Community-based or Sectoral Organizations that promote the welfare of the nation. The state shall protect the right to health of the people and instill health consciousness among them, the state is mandated to promote a just and dynamic social order that will ensure the prosperity and independence of the NATION AND FREE THE PEOPLE FROM POVERTY. The Ang Bagong Lahing Filipino Development, Incorporated, is duly established and organized and existing under Philippine law (Republic Act. 1459) with principal office at 7426 EMF Bldg. Santillan St., Pio Del Pilar Makati City, with SEC. REGISTRATION No. 2002200833-2002, (NGO) Registered in the National Library S.E.C. 178.6, entitled TORRENS SYSTEM PROCEEDING REGISTRATION OF REAL PROPERTY TITLES AND DEEDS in respect of letters, the copyright shall belong to the writer subject to the provisions of Article 723 of the Civil Code. (Sec. 6, P.D. No. 49a), on August 3, 2004 with Registration No. A 2002-1375 and published in the tabloid newspaper, Bulgar (Boses ng Masa at Mata ng Bayan), NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC dated October 1, 2004, October 8, 2004, and October 15, 2004. RESOLUTION No. 01 Series of 2003 published on the national and elite newspapers Philippine Daily Inquirer on February 16, 2003, entitled LAND FOR THE LANDLESS AND HOME FOR THE HOMELESS on page 90, SEC. 9, VOL. 8 No. 70. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) That the above mentioned land is affirmed and confirmed by honorable Supreme Court in
OZAMIZ OFFICE 129 Bito-on, Ozamiz City 7200 Misamis Occidental, Philippines SMS / Text Hotline: +63 926 423 4313 (GLOBE) +63 908 997 8835 (SMART) Email: garingsr.romeo@gmail.com Web: blptorrenssystemlaw.multiply.com www.scribd.com/garingsrromeo MAKATI OFFICE 1273 Room 302 Triple M Bldg., Batangas St., cor., Guatemala St., San Isidro, Makati City 1234 Philippines Phone: 394-2755 / 392-3653 / (02) 467-5292 Mobile: (63) 0908-6024635 Email: dr_alvinalmirante@yahoo.com Web: www.blpfoundation.org www.blptorrensystem1858.com

an EN BANC DECISION under G.R. No. 103727 and G.R. No. 106496, became final and immediately executory, promulgated December 18, 1996, and EN BANC Supreme Court Resolution dated 11th of July, 200; 30th January, 2001 and 5th March, 2002 with warning: that no further pleadings will be entertained or the same land cannot be again litigated in any future action at any court of justice in the Philippines. (Id., Art. 481) (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) Under the consolation of original case LRC/CIVIL Case No. 997-P into LRC/CIVIL CASE No. 3957-P has been submitted and impleaded. But we seek the truth and nothing but the truth that this Honorable Court has come to intervene where the succor of the Magistrate of justice for equity and vindication by the untainted facts and necessitate this providential circumstances in as much as its paramount objective to secure the weak and exalt the victims of oppression for the unmolested true spirit of justice and its virtue for the deserving litigants.(Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) The Decision with Compromise Agreement, 7th Judicial District, Branch XXVIII, Pasay City, LRC/CIVIL CASE No. 3957-p, Presiding Judge Hon. Enrique A. Agana, a sworn statement that, it was known fact when both LRC Commissioner Antonio Noblejas and Asst. Commissioner Gregorio Bilog Jr. divulged the Modus Operandi of the organized syndicate in both LRC and in the Bureau of Lands then to defeat the interest of the herein land owners, which were an admission of these land authority that the eligible land records and documents of the OCT No. T-01-4, TCT No. T-408, and TCT No. T-498 had been subjected to manipulation, alteration falsification orchestrated by no other than in the LRC and the Bureau of Lands in connivance by those in the Register of Deeds. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P. 80 con. Register of Deed created a vacuum which is another basis of the land grabbers to proliferate their unlawful activities upon raping the veto of the countrys Torrens System by way of mass production of invalid Land Titles for continues cycles of scam to the final prejudice of the government and the general public. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P. 80 If we refresh our idea for the truth over the land in question based on the government position paper and its evidences, ultimately, we could assess the veracity of ownership over said land of a person who has better rights and interest over the subject matter. Indeed, concretely rectified upon the creation of the Supreme Court in 1580. Paragraph K of the government Possession Paper manifested with Supreme Court Chief Justice Hon. Jose P. Laurel dissenting opinion, it declared all Presidential Proclamations, Executive Orders, Letters of Instructions and Decree of any purpose or purposes had no force and effect over real properties covered by TORRENS TITLE for and in the name of private person in

the absence of just compensation. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA pg. 49, 57, 58, 73 The Torrens System in the Philippines is judicial in form but administrative in character. Judicial proceedings for the registration of land throughout the Philippines shall be in rem and shall be based on he generally accepted principles underlying the Torrens System (Sec. 2, P.D. 1529). In connection with Section 108 of P.D. 1529, Act No. 141, it is conclusive upon the whole world including the government. Because all land to which claimants have acquired imperfect or incomplete title within the contemplation of Section 48 of Commonwealth Act No. 141--------Most of the land now occupied or possessed by the people throughout the Philippines are not covered by titles issued by the Government. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) Besides, based on agreement predicted by this Decision with Compromise Agreement, the issue as to the legality of ownership of the American government over the subject land was whether or not said land is lawful to be inherited by the Philippine government from the U.S. government. Certainly, based on the evidences and circumstances, the ownership of the Philippine Republic and its government over the subject noble lands was void and unconstitutional even if the basis was a Philippine Constitution of 1935 but neither the Malolos Constitution could warrant the legality of Philippine government ownership over the said land on the reason that U.S. government acquired unlawful right over the land, the same, it thwarted the EVIL interest of the Republic of the Philippines over the subject lands. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA pg. 51 The sworn testimonials of NBI Director Jolly Bugarin before the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee headed by the Ex-Senate President Gil Puyat and made as integral portion of the government Position Paper divulging several Modus Operandi of those in the LRCBUREAU of LAND before in conspiracy of those influential group in the government in the massive issuance of fake land titles in favor of the land grabbers and oligarch real estate developers as they were benefited by those who could pay lucrative sum. The Modus Operandi is as follows: The grand design, land grabbing of the LRC-BUREAU OF LANDS in conspiracy with their cohorts real state Developers has caused the root of some 20 million fake and titles over the subject lands under the following procedures; (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph) By possession of the land since time immemorial.-Occupant of lands who, by themselves and their predecessors-in-interest, have been in possession of the land since time immemorial. Their possession of the land for such length of time justifies the presumption that the land had never been part of the public domain and that it had been private property even before Spanish conquest. (Republic vs. Court of Appeals, 335 SCRA 693; see also Oh Cho vs. Director of Lands, 75 Phil. 890; Nelayan vs. Nelayan, 109 Phil. 183;

Manarpaac vs. Cabauatan, 21 SCRA 743) (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) Therefore, the Government according to the LRC Commissioner Antonio M. Noblejas. Can it be that the government a direct source of fraudulent evidences? Besides the legal ownership rights of the private person heirs are fully supported by strong evidences of ownership over the land adapting the evidences of the Republic of the Philippines but the claim for ownership by the government and that the paragraph I of the government Position Paper over the same subject land has been strongly opposed under the principle of PRIUS TEMPORE PORTIUR JURI by the Private N.G.O. considering that no less than the AMICUS CURAE and this court were the ones that confirmed the legitimacy and the physical evidence of the said land owners, besides, the alleged expropriation by the government over the subject land in favor of the legal owners. Therefore, the government should be barred by statute of Limitation and/or Estopel for public interest, since people demand honest services from the government. Because the government never possessed said better ownership and legal rights over the land than what the heirs have in as much as the legal heirs remained physically fit, alive and kicking and controverting strongly the deceptive allegation of the Republic of the Philippines that the owners and heirs over the subject land were dead and no survivor to claim it so it should necessarily be reverted to public domain, are allegations full of deception and purely hearsay. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P. 61, 62, 63, 69 Yet, very clearly, that land grabbing scheme massively laundered icing by socialized housing programs, urban and agricultural land reform of the government in connivance with the developers, sometimes in the pretext of NATIONAL GOVERNMENT infrastructure program is a silent confiscation of real properties of the private persons. By these circumstances where the National Government arrogantly launched its immovable, it is hard to admit that there was no violation of Due Process. Actually, it is presently a serious offense of the National Government for grand design of its cohorts depriving the constitutional mandate of Section 1 and Section 2 of Article 111 of our 1935 Constitution, directly defeating the real substance of Due Process, namely: (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph) DWCA P. 8, 9 1. To prevent improper government encroachment against an individuals life, liberty and property. 2. 3. To prevent arbitrary exercise of government powers. To prevent unjustified confiscation of private properties.
OZAMIZ OFFICE 129 Bito-on, Ozamiz City 7200 Misamis Occidental, Philippines SMS / Text Hotline: +63 926 423 4313 (GLOBE) +63 908 997 8835 (SMART) Email: garingsr.romeo@gmail.com Web: blptorrenssystemlaw.multiply.com www.scribd.com/garingsrromeo
MAKATI OFFICE 1273 Room 302 Triple M Bldg., Batangas St., cor., Guatemala St., San Isidro, Makati City 1234 Philippines Phone: 394-2755 / 392-3653 / (02) 467-5292 Mobile: (63) 0908-6024635 Email: dr_alvinalmirante@yahoo.com Web: www.blpfoundation.org www.blptorrensystem1858.com

PRIUS TEMPORE PORTIUR JURI and by reason that Null and Void ab initio, no force and effect; (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P. 9 The Court has observed the blueprint pattern of clandestine land grabbing by all allegedclaiming to be land owners which were derived from the NATIONAL GOVERNMENT thru its instrument agencies, the Bureau of Lands and Forestry, the Land Registration Commission in conspiracy of the officials of Building Permits, Bureau of the Department of Public Work and Highways and by the local government officials and with participation of some Register of Deeds in the City and Provinces where the lands are situated. (These are where the sacred role of the government must have to be exercised for the protection of the constitutional rights of its citizenry). (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P. 80, 69 Paragraph G. of said government Position Paper, Report of the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee, led and initiated by Hon. Senate President Gil Puyat, Sr., who conducted the investigation over the reported land scam to restore the trust and confidence of the Filipino people over the strength and Wisdom of Torrens System in the country subsiding said paramount interest while national security is at stake, participated and connived by the Department of Public Works and Highways, Building Permit Division, L.R.C. and the Survey and Record Section of the Bureau of Lands, including Register of Deeds of the affected Towns, Cities and Municipalities in massive issuance of Falsified Land Titles from O.C.T. 01 to O.C.T. No. 100,000 embracing the subject embarrassment of the national government which were taken advantage by irresponsible Real Estate Developers, local and Barangay Official who where directly engaged in the selling of right of the subject land. DWCA P.69 The Law have admittedly say that not even the NATIONAL GOVERNMENT may acquire the land in question owned by private person by way of prescription even if to the extent of taking the land for roads and highways or infrastructures by reason of EMINENT DOMAIN, the Title thereof could not be transferred to the government, which held under the case of Herrera vs. Auditor General 102 Phil. 1017 (1960) that such registered property cannot be lost to the government by prescription and the owner is entitled to be paid of the price thereof as prescribed by our 1935 Constitution Section 2 of Article 111 (Bill of Right). (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P.115 Unquote Similarly, the Moro-Moro court proceedings in this Sala under LRC/Civil Case No. 997-P against Don Esteban Benitez Tallano and Prince Lacan Acuna Tagean Tallano, contemplated by some government officials in Malacaan in conspiracy of these developers who managed the validation of their fictitious Land Titles particularly this OCT-333 of Bonifacio Regalado its Decree No. 1141 has been found covering land in Florida Blanca, the OCT-735 of Don Mariano Severino Tuazon and Tuazon company, Don Mariano San Pedro Esteban TCT-4136,

Don Annacleto Madrigal Acop and Don Esteban Benitez Tallano TCT No. T-408, and TCT No. T-498, University of the Philippines who used OCT 735, OCT 730 and that OCT-632 own by Eulalio Ragua, that OCT-291 and that OCT 820 owned by Patricia Tiongson and by the National Government, and all OCT its numbers from OCT-369, OCT-222,OCT-01-4, OCT4136, OCT-144, OCT-545, OCT 777, OCT-730, OCT-735, OCT-820, OCT-1136, OCT-684, OCT-4080, OCT-994, OCT-4085, OCT-339, OCT-546, OCT-393, OCT-291, OCT 160, OCT844, OCT-347, TCT No. T-408, and TCT No. T-498 and obviously from OCT 01 to OCT 100,000 which was declared non-bankable due to their fraudulent characteristic, and null and void ab initio by my predecessor in this court DECISSION with COMPROMISE AGREEMENT on February 04, 1972. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) The CESSATION TREATY between the United States of America and the Spanish government ceded the Philippines, Guam, Cuba and Puerto Rico in the amount of $20 million U.S. dollars is abusive in character because the Spanish government had no Authority to cede the Philippines to the United States of America on the mere ground that the war between the countries was merely a vaudeville and a hoax. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph) DWCA P.38, 46, 47, 48 The Spanish historian claimed that the Philippines was discovered by Magellan in honor of the King of Spain was entirely misleading and full of deception because said claim was only an avenue to justify the declaration of CESSATION TRATY between the American and Spanish government involving the islands of the Philippines. DWCA P. 46 American ownership over the archipelago was no force and effect even the HHC LAW, better known as HARVEY-HARDING CUTTING LAW. In lieu of the congressional initiatives over the Philippine Islands, the said HHC Law had been rejected by the Filipino Legislators because it totally deprived the basic rights of the private owner and the Filipino people over the lands in the Philippines. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P. 48, 49, 109 Such EVIL BITZ intent had never ended and the same were inherited by those of similar intention like the Spanish Meztizo/Filipino. These Spanish Meztizo sought seats in the Philippine Congress and key positions in the Philippine Commission like the TUAZON, the ORTIGAS, the ARANETAS, the AYALAS, the MADRIGAL ACOP and the BENITEZ TALLANO to name a few. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P.39, 50 Now, very apparently, the invaders were not the Spanish Royal Crown and neither the Great Americans, but merely the Spanish Filipino Meztizos who have had vested interest to grab the archipelago. Definitely, even before from the time immemorial such land had been a private land even before the Spanish dominion controverting lawfully that there is no FRIAR

LAND in the Philippines. Definitely THERE IS NO FRIAR LAND merely a HOAX. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P. 37 It has likewise been argued, even in other jurisdictions having similar statue, that the registrars of deeds are granted powers which they cannot properly exercise; that the equal protection of the law is denied; that functions purely administrative in their nature are committed in the judicial department; But all these objections have been rejected and the constitutionality of the law sustained (Government vs. Abural, 39 Phil. 996 [1919]; Ruymann vs. Director of Lands, 34 Phil. 428 [1916]; Taylor vs. Judges of the Court of Registration, 175 Mass. 71). The title issued under Torrens System is indefeasible and it cannot be lost by prescription. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) Book P. The, Resolution No. 01 Series of 2003, held on January 31, 2003 at B.L.P.D. Foundation Office Makati City, was published in the national elite news paper Philippine Daily Inquirer, stated thereon paragraph (4), WHEREAS, it is already a public knowledge that OCT No. 014, OCT No. 4136, TCT No. T-408, and TCT No. T-409 otherwise known as SPANISH TITLE had been declared invalidated or NULL and VOID per Presidential Decree No. 892 or Republic Act No. 3344, Section 194 of the Revised Civil Code of the Philippines; paragraph (5), WHEREAS, the rationale of this resolution in not to harass, blackmail, confiscate or disturb real properties already acquired through administrative characters and fraudulent titles with fraudulent decree. The Torrens System is in good faith and a symbol of unification, peace, political, social and economic stability and therefore the scheme is AS IS WHERE IS which means that all properties already occupied, settled and developed are necessarily not adversely affected; but to registered under the provision of TORRENS SYSTEM Act No. 496, P.D. 2259, amended and superseded by P.D. 1529 known as the Property Registration Decree. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) It is a universal acceptance, the title of the Land once registered under Torrens System, is sufficient notice to the whole world because such action is an action In Rem. All concern including the government and its agencies should take notice of this rule, that no one can plead by reason of ignorance of registration. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) Many times the law had declared and by the opinion of known luminaries and judges of Philippine Court in regard to the acquisition of Title of real property by adverse possession is not applicable to the land. The registered Land title under the Torrens system in consonance with the provisions of the Land Registration Act 496, which was clearly cited in a case, Corporacion de pp Agustinos vs. Crisostomo, 32 Phil 427 (1915) (Machine copy is

hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P. 115 A proceeding is in rem if the object is to bar indifferently all who might be minded to make an objection of any sort against the right sought to be established, or if anyone in the world has right to be heard on the strength of alleging facts which, if true, show an inconsistent interest. (Manuela Grey Alba vs. Anacleto R. De la Cruz, G.R. No. L-5246, Sept. 16 1910) (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) The eventually established similar political interest in the Philippine Commonwealth that caused the passage of repressive laws. Its focal objectives were to dispense the interest to manipulate the records of the said lands to follow suit their interest and to maneuver for the re-issuance of another Title that would subside the Title of the Torrens System. These repressive laws were as follows: R.A. 2259 better known as the Cadastral Act of March 14, 1914 and the Republic Act 496 better known as the Land Registration Act of 1902. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P. WHEREAS: The Regalian Doctrine or Jura Regalia is a Western legal concept that was first introduced by the Spaniards in the country through the law of the Indies and the Royal Cedulas. (Cruz vs. Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources, 347 SCRA 128) The Spanish Title --- No Longer Admissible as evidence of ownership, with this passage of Presidential Decree No. 892, effective February 16, 1976, Spanish Title can no longer be used as evidence of land ownership. under the same decree, lands not under the Torrens System shall be considered as unregistered land. (Republic vs. Court of Appeals, 135 SCRA 156; Director of Lands vs. Rivas, 141 SCRA 329) (Republic vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, 186 SCRA 88) LET THE PEOPLE KNOW Book Under Commonwealth Act No. 141--- most of the land now occupied or possessed by the people throughout the Philippines are not covered by titles issued by the government. (See Republic Act No. 2061; 6263; P .D. 1073; Also Sec. 14, P .D. 1529) LET THE PEOPLE KNOW Time immemorial. Refers to a period of time when as far back as memory can go, certain Indigenous Cultural Communities/Indigenous Peoples are known to have occupied, possessed in the concept of owner, and utilized a defined territory devolved to them, by operation of customary law or inherited from their ancestors, in accordance with their customs and traditions. (R.A. No. 8371 Indigenous Peoples Rights Act of 1997, Sec. 3[p]) (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.)

WHEREAS It was a known fact when both LRC Commissioner Antonio Noblejas and Asst. Commissioner Gregorio Bilog Jr., divulged the Modus Operandi of the organized syndicate in both LRC and in the Bureau of Land then to defeat the interest of the herein land owners. The only course to stop total changes of corruption is to eradicate the unmanageable evil and anomaly in the LRC and in the Register of Deeds, where the lawful registered owner, should be a holder of Torrens Title for the land they acquired by their own labours, sweat and exerted efforts for quite so long. To hold such land beyond the true and lawful orders of land ownership in greater sense would vindicated within the ambit of law in the Torrens System because, to the contrary, the Supreme Court cited the incident in a case Vital vs. Arore, et al, (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P. 100 PROBATIVE VALUE OF A TORRENS TITLE 1. A Torrens title is generally a conclusive evidence of the ownership of the land referred to therein (Ching vs. Court of Appeals, 1990, 181 SCRA 9, 18; Sec. 49, Act 496). It is settled that mere possession cannot defeat the title of a holder of a registered Torrens title to real property (J.M. Tuazon & Co. Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, 1979, 93SCRA 146 cited in Abad vs Court of Appeals, 1989, 179 SCRA 817, 826-827). 2. A Torrens certificate accumulates in one document a precise and correct statement of the exact status of the fee simple title which as owner possesses. The certificate, once issued, is the evidence of the title which the owner has (Legarda, et al., vs. Saleedy, 31 Phil. 590 [915]. 3. A Torrens title, once registered, cannot be defeated, even by adverse, open, and notorious possession. A registered title under the Torrens system cannot be defeated by prescription. The title, once registered, is noticed to the whole world. All persons must take notice. No one can plead ignorance of the registration (Egao vs. Court of Appeals, 1989, 174 SCRA 484, 492 citing Legarda vs. Saleeby, 31 Phil. 590, 595; See also Sec. 46 of Act 496, Land Registration Act). 4. In the case of a transfer certificate of title, the same is enforceable in the hands of a holder in good faith and for valuable consideration or an innocent purchaser for value. An innocent purchaser for value is deemed, under the Torrens system, to include an innocent lessee, mortgagee, or other encumbrances for value (Ibid citing Leung Yee vs. Strong Machinery Co., 37 Phil. 644). Section 51, Paragraph 2 of the Property Registration Decree (P.D. 1529) of Land Registration Act (Act No. 496). 5. Section 3 of Presidential Decree No. 1073 dated January 25, 1977 further provides:

Section 3 the judicial confirmation of incomplete titles to public land based on unperfected Spanish Grants such as application for the purchase, prior to the transfer or sovereignty from Spanish to the United State shall no longer be allowed. However, P.D. 1529 should be read in conjunction with the provisions of this section shall not be construed as prohibiting any person claiming the same land under Section 48 (B) and Section 48 (C) if he meets the conditions prescribed for Judicial confirmation of Torrens System. 6. On July 7, 1989, Trial on the merits proceeded against the private respondents Ocampo, Buhain and Dela Cruz, the lower court rendered judgment dismissing the complaint on the subject land claim in the history of the Philippines in the subject controversy in these consolidated cases base on the following ground that; (a) private respondent are already the registered owners of the parcels of land covered by Torrens title which cannot be defeated by the alleged Spanish title. (b) To enjoy the presumption of validity as a last hurrah to champion their claim to the vast state covered by the Spanish title.
GENERAL RULE A certificate of titles is not conclusive evidence of title if the same land had already been registered and an earlier certificate for the same is in existence whether wholly or partly, the certificate that is earlier title in date prevails. (Heir of Luis J. Gonzales vs. Gonzaga vs. Court of Appeal, 261 SCRA 327) A land registration court has no jurisdiction to order the registration of land already decreed in the name of another in earlier land registration case. (Laburada vs. Land Registration Authority, 387 SCRA 333) a second decree for the same land is, therefore, null and void (Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System vs. Court of Appeal, 215 SCRA 783) once declared by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Torrens System Title to the land is already a res judicata binding on the whole world, the proceeding being in rem (Lahora vs. Dayanghirang, Jr., 37 SCRAA 346). Proceeding in rem. Judicial proceedings for the registration of lands throughout the Philippines shall be in rem, and shall be based on the generally accepted principles underlying the Torrens system. (P 1529, Sec. 2) .D. Land registration under the Torrens system is a judicial proceeding in rem (P.D. 1529. Sec. 2), intended to confirm and register the ownership or title of a person over the land. (see Republic vs. Reyes, 71 SCRA 450, 458; Development Bank of the Phil. Vs. Court of Appeals, 331 SCRA 267, 281) In rem proceedings such as land registration constitutes constructive notice to the whole world. (Calalang vs. Register of Deeds of Quezon City, 208 SCRA 215) (Machine copy is

hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.)
REASON TO ABOLISH LRC-REGISTRATION OF DEEDS SCHEME I 1. Issuance of new Approved Survey Plan in Pre-patent 2. Issuance of Pre-patent Original Certificate of Title at a good price per square meter and better price, the LRC-Register of Deeds people mutilate Pre-patent OCT for the immediate issuance of Transfer Certificate of Title in the name of the conspirators fraudulent land owners. SCHEME II 1. Issuance of ante-dated Approval Survey Plan with micro-film 2. Issuance of ante-dated Decree over the subject land with some Spanish Character and Language. 3. Issuance of ante-dated OCT to TCT in exchange of lucrative sum per square meter depending on the location of the land with Spanish character and language. SCHEME III 1. Issuance of ante-dated Approval Survey Plan with micro-film 2. Issuance of ante-dated Decree 3. Issuance of ante-dated Title from OCT to TCT in exchange for 30.00 to 40.00 per square meter For those who cannot pay in spot cash, the applicant will be required to pay fifty (50) percent down payment and the Letter of Guarantee of Payment by the financing private bank or, most of the time, by the recommendation of those influential persons from Malacaang Palace, the. SCHEME IV 1. Issuance of ante-dated Approval Survey Plan in the name of LRC-BUREAU OF LANDS employees cohorts and relatives. 2. Issuance of ante-dated OCT and then TCT in the name of their cohorts and relatives 3. Then sell the land to the developers or buyers 4. Beforehand, the developers-claimants would be engaged in the hiring of professional squatters to occupy the area before the document of ownership is processed to guarantee the occupancy of the land.

SCHEME V 1. Issuance of government infrastructure permit to the applicant to occupy the land 2. Fencing and installing paid security personnel. 3. Through recommendation of Malacaang authority, application procure development loan from government financing institutions and eventually for approval by mere presentation of the following: a.) TCT form fake origin to procure 1. Building permit with Project Plan. 2. Authority to Develop and permit to sell issued by the Department of Public Works Building Permit Division and the Human Settlement Regulatory Commission (HSRC) 3. Most of the developers absconded the funds that had released under bank loans to diversify into another project but some pursue the development as regular business like those thriving real estate developers who became millionaires under the blessing of these schemes to the predicament of the legitimate land owners, the Noble BLPD FOUNDATION, INC., and finally to the damage of the General Public. Besides, the government never possessed said better ownership and legal right over the land than what the legal owner have in as much as the legal authority by conveyance that the ANG BAGONG LAHING FILIPINO DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, remained physically fit, alive and kicking with millions of member to fight back against government interest to land grab the land owned by a private NGO. The controversy of the government strongly the deceptive, blatant lie allegation of the Republic of the Philippines that the said owners over the subject land were dead and no survivor to claim it so it should necessarily be reverted to Public Domain, are allegations full of deception beyond the basis of truth that the government failed and continuously failing to prove its better and stronger rights over the land in question against the rightful owners evidence therefore allegations are purely hearsay in the side of the government. And face such abusive laws, unlawful conducts and act orchestrated by the oligarch government leaders of this generation, not only for the deprived parties but for the entire Filipino people for our nations economic breakthrough from its century ailing and sickly society with suffering citizenry. That the Ang Bagong Lahing Filipino Development Foundation, Incorporated, herein respondentlawful owner holder of Torrens System Proceeding and Registration of Property Title and Deeds who has been in possession of subject land in dispute, the action is to quite all the aforesaid titles because has no longer probative value on the reason that the Spanish Mortgage Law and Spanish Title is supposed to be abrogated for national interest, and that Land Title cannot facilitate the purpose of the True owners against the government and other parties is imprescriptibly in nature (Baladay vs. Castrillo, et al, 1961, SCRA 99, Ramirez vs. Court of Appeals, et al, 1969, 30 SCRA 297). (Machine copy is hereto

attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) DWCA P. 102 With the blessing of our Supreme Being with His judicial enhancement over the victims of injustices and greatest land grabbing scandals in Philippine history, To settle once and for all the issue of ownership through conveyance over the land under The mother title OCT 779, was transferred to TCT-8982, Decree No. 10198, TCT-8983, Decree 10128, TCT8984, Decree No. 10139, covered by Original Survey Plan II-4509, date of Original Survey, March 23-27, September 8-15, 1909, April 9-12, and June 3-24, 1910, approved on October 23, 1911. Registered of Title, Case No. 8511, published in the Official Gazette, on December 11, 1912 by authority of the Philippine Commission, Manila, P.I. Vol. X Page No. 50, witnessed by Hon. Norberto Romualdez, Associate Judge of the Court of the Land Registration on 6th day of November, in the year A.D. 1912 and attested by Ralph E. Mcfie, clerk of the court in the name of Don Domingo De Ocampo having been duly and regularly heard in accordance with the provisions of Torrens System Law, Memorandum from The Office of the Secretary of The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Subject: ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE (OCT) NO. 779 (Ref. code # 292859), Date: January 23, 2004. Respectfully referred herewith, for appropriate action, is the letter of Mr. Anthony S. Martin regarding Original Certificate of Title (OCT) No. 779 covered by II-4509. Relative thereto, certain Mr. Mario M. Landicho, Land Examiner of that office issued a certification addressed to the Director, Land Registration Titling Division of the Land Registration Authority dated 19 August 2003, stating that per record of that office the said title was transferred to Ang Bagong Lahing Filipino Development Foundation, Inc, owned by Dr. Alvin Almirante G. Bersales, Ph.D. (copy attached), by virtue of conveyance Absolute Deed of Sale and Memorandum of Agreement, now the lawful owner is transferred to Ang Bagong Lahing Filipino Development Foundation, Inc. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.) However, in the absence of the herein specified lawful heir, his eligible Wife and Son, qualified to suite the requirements set forth by his predecessor, Don Dr. Alvin Almirante G. Bersales I, a Doctorate Degree HONORIS CAUSA with Dissertation entitled Environmental Protection Maintenance and Management The Micro and Macro Level Approach in Philippine Setting at the University of the Philippines, born under the Zodiac sign of Gemini, whose name should be identical to any of the heir and whose mentality is highly positive with exerted effort of cooperation and determination for the Estate to share the people of the Republic of the Philippines below poverty and less fortunate Filipino. Let this Decision with Compromise Agreement be enforced enjoining all concerned private persons and government authorities herein specified and everybody, natural or judicial person, to observe and address this Decision with Compromise Agreement observing the imprescriptibility period clause over its execution or issuance of its required original and

duplicate copies of mother title OCT 779, including its TSTCT No. 8982, TSTCT No. 8983, and TSTCT No. 8984 in the name of ANG BAGONG LAHING FILIPINO DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, and any from government body, within and/or outside the archipelago, either a member of United Nation of any League of Foreign Nation, Federation as long as within the bond and jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice to serve for the interest of the lawful beneficiaries and the whole Filipino people in general, otherwise, anyone who defies this order shall be dealt accordingly with the fullest force of the law. (Machine copy is hereto attached as NNEX and made an integral part of this paragraph.)

VISION
An entity, conscious of its role to promote and attain the full trust and confidence of the Republic in the TORRENS TITLE. EUROPEAN COMMISSION
B. L. P.
TORRENS SYSTEM LAW
Real Property Act 1858 PALUPA PROGRAM and BEYOND
DR. ALVIN ALVINCENT ALMIRANTE G. BERSALES, Ph.D. President / Chairman ANG BAGONG LAHING PILIPINO DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC.
KUNG HINDI NGAYON... ... KAILAN? KUNG HINDI TAYO ANG KIKILOS... ... SINO ANG KIKILOS?

The Father of Torrens System in The Philippines

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Father of Torrens System in The Philippines

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ANG BAGONG LAHING PILIPINO DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC.