Professional Documents
Culture Documents
When an eccentric millionaire asks one to build a tower for them, one does not just
simply say no! In this case, the millionaire has a plot of 31 by 31 feet, and wants an 18-sided
tower built on their plot. However, the local rules say that one cannot build within 3 feet of the
plot limits; therefore the available building space has actually been reduced to 25 by 25 feet of
space.
Part 2:
Figure 1. Part 2A
Figure 1 shows the four polygons of the tower as well as the scale, the plot dimensions,
how many sides the tower has, and the length of one polygon to the other. The scale for this
drawing, as well as all of the other drawings, is 3 feet of tower space for every 1 in-real-life
centimeter. The original plot, as previously stated, was 31 by 31 feet. Due to the limits, one has
to go in by 3 feet on all sides; therefore the limit in which the tower can be constructed is 25 by
25 feet, or 6 feet off total. The tower that was asked to be constructed was asked to be
Hoisington 2
constructed in a way so that it turned out with 18 total sides. Finally, the length of one polygon to
the other is approximately .32 centimeters, which is actually 1 foot in the full scale tower.
The central angle was also asked for by the millionaire. This can be found by using a
formula, 360/n, with n standing for number of sides to the polygon. With the formula and
substitutions, it looks like this:
360/n
360/18
Figure 3. Polygon 1
Polygon 1, as illustrated in figure 3, is the start of the footing, or the outer edge of the
footing. Segment ME (M standing for middle and E standing for edge) is equal to 4.16
centimeters, which, when scaled, equals 12.5 feet. One would find this length by taking half of
Hoisington 3
the limit boxs length, which was 25 feet, so half of that would be 12.5 feet. To find one side of
polygon 1, one must find the length between B11 and B12 (which stand for Base of polygon one
[1] and Base of polygon one [2].) This can be found using formulas like so:
Sin = o/h (o = side opposite of the angle, h = hypotenuse of the triangle)
Figure 4. Base Formula
Figure 4 shows the formula used to find the base of any triangle when given the angle
and the hypotenuse. Since the central angle has been proven to be 20 degrees, half of that would
be 10 degrees, and so that is equal to because is half of the central angle, which is the half of
the triangle. Also, the hypotenuse, or segment ME, has already been proven to be 12.5 feet.
When plugged into the formula, it looks like:
Sin(10) = o/12.5
12.5 sin(10) = o
2(12.5 sin(10)) = One side of polygon 1 4.34 feet
Figure 5. One Side of Polygon 1
Because this is only the opposite of the 10 degree angle, this measurement has to be
multiplied by two, because the central angle is 20 degrees. This value is also approximately 4.34
feet. To find the area of the triangle, and then eventually polygon 1, one needs the height of the
triangle. The height can be found using cosine.
Hoisington 4
So says figure 6, the height of polygon 1 is also approximately equal to 12.31 feet. Now
all that is left is to find the area of polygon 1. The area of polygon 1 is equal to the area of the
triangle multiplied by 18, because there are 18 sides to the polygon. The area of a triangle is
equal to (1/2)(base)(height). This can be expressed as:
A = 18(1/2bh)
A = 18 (1/2((12.5 sin(10))2) (12.5 cos(10)))
APOLYGON 1 480.97 feet2
Figure 7. Area of Polygon 1
In figure 7, first is the area formula for the 18 sided polygon, and then the base and height
of the triangle that has already been found was plugged in. The area of the first polygon, polygon
1, is about 480.97 square feet.
Hoisington 5
Figure 8. Polygon 2
In the first line of text in figure 1, the 1 is subtracted from a because the height is 1 foot
less than polygon 1. Then the values are plugged in, and both sides are multiplied by the
dividend. Then it is multiplied by 2 because it was only half of the base. Therefore, one side of
polygon 2 is approximately 3.99 feet.
Hoisington 6
The height, as previously stated, is 1 foot less than polygon 1, so the height of this triangle is
about 11.31 feet. The formula for the height could be displayed as:
H = ((12.5 cos(10))-1) 11.31 feet
Figure 10. Polygon 2 Height Formula
Now, the area of this polygon must be found. The same formula can be used as last time:
A = 18(1/2bh)
A = 18(1/2(2(((12.5 cos(10))-1) tan(10)) ((12.5 cos(10))-1)))
APOLYGON 2 406.00 feet2
Figure 11. Polygon 2 Area Formulas and Substitutions
In figure 11, it shows the area formula for the 18 sided polygon first, then the base and
height values are inputted, and then finally the area is shown. The area of the second polygon is
approximately 406.00 square feet.
Hoisington 7
The formula shown in figure 13 can be round to about 10.31 feet. The base is found in almost the
exact same way as polygon 2, but instead of subtracting 1 from the height (a), 2 must be
subtracted because it is 2 feet shorter. The formulas and substitutions look like this:
Tan = o/a-2
Tan(10) = o/((12.5 cos(10))-2)
((12.5 cos(10))-2) tan(10) = o
2(((12.5 cos(10))-2) tan(10)) = One side of polygon 3 3.64 feet
Figure 14. Polygon 3 Triangle Base Formula and Substitutions
Hoisington 8
So, as proven in figure 15, the area of polygon 3 is approximately 337.38 square feet.
Hoisington 9
As for the side length of polygon 4, one must find the base of this triangle, also using
tangent. This time, however, 3 must be subtracted from a, because the height is 3 feet shorter.
In the formula, it looks like this:
Tan = o/a-3
Tan(10) = o/((12.5 cos(10))-3)
((12.5 cos(10))-3) tan(10) = o
2(((12.5 cos(10))-3) tan(10)) = One side of polygon 4 3.28 feet
Figure 18. One Side of Polygon 4
Figure 18 shows the formula, with 3 subtracted from a because it is 3 feet shorter than it
was in polygon 1, the inputted values, and then the solved equation, which tells that one side of
polygon 4 is about 3.28 feet. Finally, the last area of all the polygons.
A = 18(1/2bh)
A = 18(1/2(2(((12.5 cos(10))-3) tan(10)) ((12.5 cos(10))-3)))
APOLYGON 4 275.11 feet2
Figure 19. Area of Polygon 4 Formulas and Substitutions
Figure 19 shows the area formula, and the inputted values for the base and height, then the final
approximated area of polygon 4. The area of the final polygon, polygon 4, is about 275.11 square
feet.
Hoisington 10
Part 3:
Figure 21 shows the volume formula for these polygons, A stands for the area of one
triangle from the polygon and D stands for the depth, which is 3.5 feet in this case.
Hoisington 11
Due to the fact the height and base of these polygons have already been found, the only thing left
to do is plug the values into the volume formula.
VPOLYGON 1 = 18((1/2((12.5 sin(10))2) (12.5 cos(10))) 3.5)
VPOLYGON 1 1683.38 feet3
VPOLYGON 4 = 18((1/2(2(((12.5 cos(10))-3) tan(10)) ((12.5 cos(10))-3))) 3.5)
VPOLYGON 4 962.87 feet3
VFOOTING = VPOLYGON 1 VPOLYGON 4
VFOOTING = (18((1/2((12.5 sin(10))2) (12.5 cos(10))) 3.5)) (18((1/2(2(((12.5 cos(10))3) tan(10)) ((12.5 cos(10))-3))) 3.5))
VFOOTING 720.51 feet3
Figure 22. Footing Volume Formulas and Substitutions
In figure 22, it shows the volume of polygon 1, then the volume of polygon 4, and then
finally the volume of polygon 1 minus polygon 4, which gives one the footings volume. Based
on the calculations in figure 22, about 720.51 cubic feet of concrete are needed for the footing.
Hoisington 12
Based on figure 24, it is now known that about 91.70 cubic feet of Plexiglas is needed to
complete the floor inside of the footing and above the aquarium.
Hoisington 13
In figure 26, it shows the waters volume formula with the values plugged in, and says
about 653.38 cubic feet of water is needed to fill the aquarium 75%.
Hoisington 14
The millionaire also asked for a cost analysis for the concrete needed and the Plexiglas
needed. For the concrete, the company sells it for $115 for every cubic yard. Because 1 yard is
equal to 3 feet, the volume of the footing, which is in cubic feet, needs to be divided by 3 to
convert it over to yards.
VFOOTING/3 = Cubic yards needed
(18((1/2((12.5 sin(10))2) (12.5 cos(10))) 3.5)) (18((1/2(2(((12.5 cos(10))-3)
tan(10)) ((12.5 cos(10))-3))) 3.5))/3 240.17 yards3
241 cubic yards $115 = $27,715 needed to purchase footing concrete
Figure 27. Concrete Needed for Footing
Figure 27 shows the formula for the concrete and the substitutions, which amounts to
about 240.17 cubic yards of concrete. In a real life situation, however, the value must be an
integer value, and because it would be better to have more than needed than not enough, the
volume becomes 241 cubic yards. Total, $27,715 is needed to purchase all of the concrete needed
to fill the footing, along with a little extra.
Now for the cost of the Plexiglas. The Plexiglas is sold in 48 inch by 96 inch sheets, with
each one being $1100, which is also 4 foot by 8 foot. This is also equal to 32 square foot sheets.
So, to find the amount of sheets needed, one must divide the area of the Plexiglas (polygon 4s
area) by 32. The formula and substitutions look like this:
Sheets = APOLYGON 4/32
Sheets = (18(1/2(2(((12.5 cos(10))-3) tan(10)) ((12.5 cos(10))-3))))/32
Sheets 8.6
9 Sheets $1100 = $9900
Figure 28. Plexiglas Needed for Floor
Hoisington 15
Figure 28 shows the formula and substitution for the needed Plexiglas. This is also a real life
situation, so the sheets value must be rounded up to the next integer, which is 9. The cost of the
Plexiglas floor over the aquarium is $9900.
Part 4:
3.99 feet
3.99 feet
Hoisington 16
7.98 feet
In figure 31, it shows that the rectangular part of the door is 15 square feet, and so the
total area of the door is the area of the top of the door plus 15 square feet. Since the top part of
the door is half of the shape of the tower, the top part of the doors area was found by using the
Hoisington 17
same triangle formula as the other polygons, but by using 1.5 feet as the radius of the shape, or
the hypotenuse of the triangle. Sine and Cosine were used to find the measurements, just like in
the polygons. To find the area of the top of the door, one must use the triangle area formula
multiplied by 9, because there are 9 sides to that shape. It looks like this:
ATD = 9(1/2bh)
ATD = 9(1/2(2(1.5 sin(10))) (1.5 cos(10)))
ATD 3.46 feet2
Figure 32. Area of TD (Top of Door)
So as proven in figure 32, the area of the top of the door is about 3.46 square feet, and
when added to the area of the rectangular part of the door, the door comes out to be, total, about
18.46 square feet.
3.99 feet
7.98 feet
Hoisington 18
AWINDOW = ATD 2
AWINDOW = (9(1/2(2(1.5 sin(10))) (1.5 cos(10)))) 2
AWINDOW 6.93 feet2
Figure 34. Area of 1 Window Formula
Figure 34 proves that the area of each window is approximately 6.93 square feet.
In order to find the overall lateral surface area of the outer walls, one must multiply the
area of each wall by 18, and then subtract the area of the door, and the window multiplied by
two, because there are two windows. It looks like this:
LSAO = (18(B H)) (ADOOR + (AWINDOW 2))
LSAO = (18((2(((12.5 cos(10))-1) tan(10))) (2(2(((12.5 cos(10))-1) tan(10))))))
((9(1/2(2(1.5 sin(10))) (1.5 cos(10))) + 15) + (((9(1/2(2(1.5 sin(10))) (1.5 cos(10))))
2) 2))
LSAO 540.39 feet2
Figure 35. Lateral Surface Area of Outer Walls
As proven in figure 35, the lateral surface area of the outer walls of the tower is about
540.39 square feet.
Hoisington 19
Part 5:
3.64 feet
7.98 feet
3.64 feet
Hoisington 20
height is the same as the outer lateral face, or 2(2(((12.5 cos(10))-1) tan(10))) feet, which is
about 7.98 feet. Therefore the dimensions of this face are about 3.64 feet by 7.98 feet.
The millionaire also wants to know the volume of this inner prism. To find the volume,
one must multiply the area of the base, which would be polygon 3 in this case, by the height of
the wall. With the formula and substitutions, it looks like this:
VI = APOLYGON 3 H
VI = (18(1/2(2(((12.5 cos(10))-2) tan(10)) ((12.5 cos(10))-2)))) (2(2(((12.5 cos(10))1) tan(10))))
VI 2,691.30 feet3
Figure 38. Volume of Inner Prism
Figure 38 tells one that the volume of the inner prism is about 2,691.30 cubic feet.
Hoisington 21
Part 6:
11.97 feet
16.47 feet
Hoisington 22
a2 + b2 = c2
((12.5 cos(10))-1)2 + (3(2((12.5 cos(10))-1) tan(10)))2 = c2
((12.5 cos(10))-1)2 + (3(2((12.5 cos(10))-1) tan(10)))2 = c2
c 16.47 feet
Figure 40. Slant Height of Outer Pyramid
As one can see, in figure 40, the slant height of a lateral face of the outer pyramid is proven to
be about 16.47 feet.
Finally, the last part that the millionaire requires of part six is to find the angle that the base of
the pyramid and the top of the prism make, or the angle at the foot of the slant height. To find
this, one can use the same triangle that was used to find the slant height, but this time using a
tangent formula instead of the Pythagorean Theorem. This time, however, one does not have the
angle measure; one has the two sides, the adjacent and the opposite. Therefore, theta will remain
theta until the end. Also, to find the angle measure, one must apply tangent to the negative first
power to both sides, so that the tangent cancels out and one is left with theta equal to the angle
measure.
Tan = o/a
tan = (3(2((12.5 cos(10))-1) tan(10)))/((12.5 cos(10))-1)
tan-1(tan) = tan-1((3(2((12.5 cos(10))-1) tan(10)))/((12.5 cos(10))-1))
46.6
Figure 41. Angle of Slant
The angle has now been proven to be approximately 46.6 in figure 41.
Hoisington 23
Part 7:
6.9
mV3PB2 =13.8
83.1
Hoisington 24
Now to find the angle measure of the other angle of this triangle. First one must start by
finding half of the angle mV3PB2 because one can only use tangent when one knows the
opposite, which in this case would be half the base, and the adjacent, which is the height. From
there, one can multiply it by 2 to find mV3PB2.
Tan = o/a
tan = (((12.5 cos(10))-1) tan(10)))/ ((((12.5 cos(10))-1)2 + (3(2((12.5 cos(10))-1)
tan(10)))2)
tan-1(tan) = tan-1((((12.5 cos(10))-1) tan(10)))/ ((((12.5 cos(10))-1)2 + (3(2((12.5
cos(10))-1) tan(10)))2))
6.9
2 = mV3PB2
mV3PB2 13.8
To find the area of this lateral face, one must use the triangle area formula, like the one
that has been used to previously find the area of each polygon.
ALATp = 1/2bh
ALATp = (1/2)(2(((12.5 cos(10))-1) tan(10)))((((12.5 cos(10))-1)2 + (3(2((12.5 cos(10))1) tan(10)))2)
ALATp 32.84 feet2
Figure 45. Area of One Lateral Face of Outer Pyramid
As proven, the area of one lateral face of the pyramid is approximately 32.84 square feet.
Hoisington 25
To now find the total lateral surface area of the pyramid, one must take the surface area of
one lateral face and multiply that value by 18, because there are 18 sides on the pyramid.
LSAOuterPyramid = ALATp 18
LSAOuterPyramid = ((1/2)(2(((12.5 cos(10))-1) tan(10)))((((12.5 cos(10))-1)2 + (3(2((12.5
cos(10))-1) tan(10)))2)) 18
LSAOuterPyramid 591.04 feet2
Figure 46. Lateral Surface Area of Outer Pyramid
Therefore, as proven in figure 46, the total lateral surface area of the outer pyramid is
about 591.04 square feet.
Hoisington 26
Part 8:
A. Drawing of inner pyramid
Hoisington 27
VIP = 1/3ABH
VIP = (1/3)(18(1/2(2(((12.5 cos(10))-2) tan(10)) ((12.5 cos(10))-2))))(3(2(((12.5
cos(10))-2) tan(10))))
VIP 1,226.67 feet3
Figure 48. Inner Pyramid Volume
Figure 48 proves that the volume of the inner pyramid is approximately 1,226.67 cubic
feet.
Hoisington 28
Part 9:
Hoisington 29
The final calculation that is required by the millionaire is the overall volume of the inner
prism. This includes the volume of the inner polygon (VI) and the volume of the inner pyramid
(VIP). The formula along with its substitutions looks like this:
VT = VI + VIP
VT = ((18(1/2(2(((12.5 cos(10))-2) tan(10)) ((12.5 cos(10))-2)))) (2(2(((12.5
cos(10))-1) tan(10))))) + ((1/3)(18(1/2(2(((12.5 cos(10))-2) tan(10)) ((12.5 cos(10))2))))(3(2(((12.5 cos(10))-2) tan(10)))))
VT 3,917.97 feet3
Figure 51. Volume of Inner Tower
As proven in figure 51, the final measurement of the tower, the volume of the inner
tower, is approximately 3,917.97 cubic feet.
Part 10:
If the owner is not happy with this amazing tower that has been constructed for them,
they must be crazy. All possible areas were covered on this 18-sided mansion. The architect
encountered numerous problems along the way, however. The most prominent problem was
definitely the fact that the calculator that was used was set to radians instead of degrees. Also, the
architect thought the inner pyramid was 1 foot shorter than the outer pyramid, but then realized
that was not the case.