Professional Documents
Culture Documents
80
Investment trapAbenomics
(Quantitative Easing)
Abstract
"Japan firsts" has always been Japanese proud slogan, in the eyes of Europe and the
United States are pointer power that cannot be ignored, these glory from the rigorous
attitude towards life as well as the Japanese Bushido spirit. From 1959 to 1969 is Japan's
golden decade, by moving the height of the economic development of Japan as the world's
second-largest economy. However, in the case of excessive economic development, Japan
1
economy in 80 years resulted in a bubble economy, and overnight, businesses and foreign
capital began to move overseas, and real estate prices also instant collapse, Japan's
economy fell into a black hole of history. Thus began, Japan's Government and Central
Bank while offering many policies, but Japan's economy has crashed, or even a liquidity
trap and investment trap, ultimately come from civil society and the business can no longer
trust the Government's policy expectations thinking, discourage bold investments all
investments and consumption, causing Japan's "lost 20 years."
The key points of this paper to discuss, under Abe's economic prowess, though short term
does make the outside world sees Japan economy out of its slump, but they made people
realize that is not the beginning of another wave of the economic bubble. In fact, Japan's
recession is that structural problems, such as an ageing population or the Government
rising deficits and a lack of innovation, these internal issues are needed one by one to view,
so this study economic indicators and historical experiences to explore why Abe's
economic policies.
2008 311
TAO
2012
3 4
2%
Abenomics
Reflation Policy
1.
2.
3.
1
TAO
19801990 1995~2012
GDP 0.8%-0.08%
2012
2001 2006
2000 1
2009
60 14.7 2009
20
7.4 10.3
2013
TAO
60
40
20
14.7
5.8
4.5
2000
2002
10.3
7.4
5.8
2009
2010
0
2009
2013
12013 1 12
TAO
(1985)
1989
1990 3
5
1989 12 29 38915.87
1991 1992 3
2 1989 8
1 4000
Liquidity Trap
1990
1990
1996 7541997
TAO
2001
--
103 70 GDP
3.5EPFR
68 2001
1 94 2007
20
TAO
()
2012
(1) :
1. 2%
2.
3.
4.
(2)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. 20
(3)
TAO
1. TPP()
2.2014 13
2012
2%
3
10
2020CO21990
25%
TAO
708
6334
9
9
( )
2008 2013
Index of Consumer Sentiment
Unemployment Rat
TAO
31.4 2008
10
2013
76
6 43.5
NHK
40
11
TAO
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
1-1
2. Consumer Price Index
CPI
CPI
CPI
TAO
CPI PPI
2008 2013
2013
2 1-2
2 2008
2.3
12
2013
2009 1.9
2
(CFI)
(CPI)
(CPI)(CFI)
(CPI)2013
8 13.2% 8.9% 2008 4 8
2013 7
2 28 6089
0.1% 3
TAO
13
3.00%
2.50%
2.00%
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
0.00%
-0.50%
-1.00%
-1.50%
-2.00%
-2.50%
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
1-2
3. Unemployment Rat
(International Labor
Office) 1982 15 (1)(2)
(3)
TAO
2008
2013
3
1-3 2008 2012 4
2009 2010 5.1
14
2013
3.8 6 2008 10
6 0.92 5 0.90
0.92
0.8% 13
TAO
3.8
3.3
18
200,000 1
8 170,000 1 2
15
200,000
3 100
95 2008 5
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
5.30%
5.10%
4.20%
4.10%
4.20%
3.80%
3.00%
2.00%
TAO
1.00%
0.00%
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
1-3
( )
16
TAO
GDP 2.5
20 0.9
3
5 34 2
17
TPP
TPP
TAO
IMF
18
TAO
19
2020
2020
<>
<<>> :
1993<<. >>
:
2007<< >>
TAO
1993<<>> :
<>
2008<<>>
20
1993 <<>>
2001 <<-->>
<>
2013< >
http://www.epochweek.com/b5/328/12120.htm 2013 5 16
2013< >
http://www.watchinese.com/article/2013/5230 2013 7 5
2013<>http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/11861
2013 7 9
2011<> http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/8935
2013 8 15
2013
http://iod.cier.edu.tw/indint/Weekly_report/PDF%E6%AA%94/%E9%80%B1%E5%A0
%B1/2013PDF/1772%E6%9C%9F%E9%9B%99%E9%80%B1%E5%A0%B1.pdf
2013 8 15
2013
TAO
http://www.cnyes.com/economy/indicator/Page/schedule.aspx 2013 8
15
2013
http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/world/2013-09/19/c_12541362
8.htm 2013 9 20
2013
http://cn.wsj.com/big5/20130815/BASc-015517.asp2013 9 20
21
TAO
22