Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The general public have multiple water values that often exist in opposition to one
another, such as economic development and protection of wild rivers.
State laws, federal laws and international compacts often outline different sets of
regulations that are contradictory during periods of water scarcity.
Water development for the growing metropolis populations is complex and often
disconnected from natural cycles, leading to a misunderstanding of the challenges.
All of these issues have become more prevalent in the recent decade with the occurrence of
severe droughts. A Federal Court ruling in 2007 ruled in favor of protecting the endangered fish
Delta smelt by reallocating 300 billion gallons of water to make up for water lost in the drought
deficit, negatively affecting farmers in the Central Valley who relied upon that water for
irrigation (USGCRP, 2009). In 2011 and 2012, severe drought conditions on top of already dry
conditions caused massive water scarcity impacts in central Texas, with some towns having to
ship in drinking water at a high cost and associated net agricultural losses of $7.62 billion (Davis,
2001). The linking feature in terms of public impact that these cases have, is a gap in
communication between what the public, economists, scientists and politicians/lawmakers value
and act upon. By addressing the communication strategies concerning water conservation and
scarcity between these parties, it will be possible to sustainably plan better use of our resources
for multiple purposes.
Works Cited
Davis, Sandra K. 2001. The politics of water scarcity in the Western states. The Social Science
Journal 38 (2001) 527-542.
Fannin, Blair. 2012. Updated 2011 Texas agricultural drought losses total $7.62 billion. Texas
A & M Agrilife. Accessed on 7 February 2012 from
http://today.agrilife.org/2012/03/21/updated-2011-texas-agricultural-drought-losses-total
7-62-billion/.
USGCRP (2009). Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States. Karl, T.R., J. M.
Melillo, and T. C. Peterson (eds.). United States Global Change Research Program.
Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.