Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Program Emphasis
Part 1
What do
you want
your
students
to know?
(Curriculum)
Iowa Core
Curriculum
Outcome Alignment
Comprehensive School
Improvement Goal
Program Emphasis
Part 2
Trajectory of
Accountability Data
and/or other Data
Source
Longitudinal Progress
Toward the
Accountability Data
and/or other Data
Source
6th grade
Group
All students
Female
Male
IEP
Non-IEP
Asian
African American
Hispanic/Latino
Pacific Islander
Two or more
ethnicities
White
504 plan
non-504 plan
free/reduced
non-free/reduced
gifted & talented
7th grade
8th grade
Count
Proficien
t
260
122
138
15
245
7
1
6
1
%
Proficien
t
70.65
71.35
70.05
28.30
77.78
77.78
20.00
66.67
100.00
Total
Student
s tested
368
171
197
53
315
9
5
9
1
Count
Proficien
t
239
127
112
13
226
8
1
6
1
%
Proficien
t
67.51
69.78
65.12
23.64
75.59
100.00
12.50
75.00
100.00
Total
Student
s tested
354
182
172
55
299
8
8
8
1
Count
Proficien
t
262
141
121
9
253
4
2
7
0
%
Proficien
t
68.59
71.57
65.41
18.37
75.98
66.67
33.33
87.50
NA
Total
Students
tested
382
197
185
49
333
6
6
8
0
10
235
6
254
38
222
127
76.92
71.00
75.00
70.56
51.35
75.51
92.03
13
331
8
360
74
294
138
7
216
3
236
38
201
131
70.00
67.71
75.00
67.43
41.76
76.43
95.62
10
319
4
350
91
263
137
6
243
3
259
38
224
159
60.00
69.03
60.00
68.70
48.72
73.68
92.98
10
352
5
377
78
304
171
6th grade
7th grade
8th grade
Group
All students
Female
Male
IEP
Non-IEP
Asian
African American
Hispanic/Latino
Pacific Islander
Two or more ethnicities
White
504 plan
non-504 plan
free/reduced
non-free/reduced
Count
Proficien
t
289
132
157
19
270
7
2
7
1
12
260
6
283
41
248
%
Proficien
t
78.32
77.19
79.29
35.19
85.71
77.78
40.00
77.78
100.00
92.31
78.31
75.00
78.39
55.41
84.07
Total
Student
s tested
369
171
198
54
315
9
5
9
1
13
332
8
361
74
295
Count
Proficien
t
300
154
146
28
272
8
2
7
1
9
273
3
297
61
239
%
Proficien
t
84.75
84.62
84.88
50.91
90.97
100.00
25.00
87.50
100.00
90.00
85.58
75.00
84.86
67.03
90.87
Total
Student
s tested
354
182
172
55
299
8
8
8
1
10
319
4
350
91
263
Count
Proficien
t
312
161
151
18
294
6
1
6
0
7
292
3
309
43
269
%
Proficien
t
81.25
81.31
81.18
35.29
88.29
100.00
16.67
75.00
NA
70.00
82.49
60.00
81.53
55.13
87.91
Total
Student
s tested
384
198
186
51
333
6
6
8
0
10
354
5
379
78
306
132
95.65
138
137
100.00
137
172
100.00
172
Group
All students
Female
Male
IEP
Non-IEP
Asian
African American
Hispanic/Latino
Pacific Islander
Two or more
ethnicities
White
504 plan
non-504 plan
free/reduced
non-free/reduced
gifted & talented
6th grade
7th grade
8th grade
Count
Proficien
t
287
134
153
25
262
8
1
5
1
%
Proficien
t
77.78
78.36
77.27
46.30
83.17
88.89
20.00
55.56
100.00
Total
Students
tested
369
171
198
54
315
9
5
9
1
Count
Proficien
t
235
117
118
21
214
7
1
7
1
%
Proficien
t
66.38
64.29
68.60
38.18
71.57
87.50
12.50
87.50
100.00
Total
Student
s tested
354
182
172
55
299
8
8
8
1
Count
Proficien
t
309
153
156
21
288
5
3
6
0
%
Proficien
t
80.26
77.66
82.98
40.38
86.49
83.33
50.00
75.00
NA
Total
Students
tested
385
197
188
52
333
6
6
8
0
10
262
6
281
47
240
133
76.92
78.92
75.00
77.84
63.51
81.36
96.38
13
332
8
361
74
295
138
9
210
4
231
44
191
131
90.00
65.83
100.00
66.00
48.35
72.62
95.62
10
319
4
350
91
263
137
7
288
2
307
46
263
170
70.00
81.13
40.00
80.79
58.97
85.67
98.27
10
355
5
380
78
307
173
Evaluation Questions
Have the students met newly created learning targets aligned with Iowa Core?
Formative Assessments
Summative test reports
Annual Progress
Review (APR) of the
Evaluation Questions,
Spring 2014
What does the data
say?
How well did you
meet the learning
goal?
As a result of the
learning, where will
you go next?
Comprehensive School
Improvement Goal
Program Emphasis
The data says students scored higher on formative assessments than they did with the same
curriculum last year. Rewriting and evaluating test questions to align with standards and the use of
technology by students in taking doing these assessments has increased scores.
The goal was successfully met.
Next year I will continue to make sure students have clear targets that are aligned with the standards
and continually evaluate the value of my assessments and what I actually want students to know.
Part 3
What are you
going to do
about it?
(Instruction)
Summarize Project
Activities to Respond to
Data including Reference to
the Evidence Base
Teachers will continue use of the Seven Strategies for Learning study guide to develop
quality formative assessments.
Frequent formative assessment of students skills will be conducted.
IDM time in the school day to work with students having learning needs.
Incorporate technology in the delivery of instruction and receiving of student work.
Incorporate Project Get It Done procedures to enhance student completion of homework
with quality.
Student and parent
Teacher
PLCs
Principal
School Site Council
District Central Administration
Comments: