Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This article is very informational to the point where I learn a lot of stuff that I didnt know. They
came up with concerns that I would never thought of. Synthetic organisms can be made to
produce fuel to reduce the earths limited fuel. However, the authors pointed out that even
though synthetic organisms could help reduce earths ticking time bomb, it could pose other
environmental risk which could harm the earth even more. Synthetic organism need to be
produce in order for them to work, but they need to build a plantation of some sort and that
could contribute to some environmental damage. They also pointed out order concerns that
could be problematic. Later on they start talking about deliberation democracy, where they want
the public to be involved with serious decision about synthetic biology. The public can have very
good
input into the decision. People can build on other peoples ideas which is always good.
The ethics of SynBioour first go
The question is what is the moral objective around synthetic biology. The authors makes us
think about the which activities of synthetic biology to condone, constrain, or ban and which to
permit because some can be bad and some can be good. Although, we know so little about
synthetic biology and we are in the early stages of it, so we dont know which to ban or permit
yet. In fact we only been modificating existing kinds of organisms, such as microbes. Most of the
public usually think of making new form of organisms but we are not even close to that stage.
There is still much to learn and people are already afraid of it. Synthetic biology may offer
nature-benefiting, even nature-preserving, opportunities. For example, the paper explains that
bio-fuel might be able to help with the problem of limited fuel on earth. It can delay all the limited
fuel we are using and prevent use to use it all. Its all about how we use synthetic biology and
how we execute it. Scientist have proposed many options to help avoiding or mitigating of
synthetic biology organisms, such as, physical barriers between the organism. Other people
also recommended a combination of professional self-monitoring, governmental oversight, and
research into technical advances that could promote security and safety. So far the first half of
the paper seems reasonable and I agree with the authors. I think we just need more time and a
better understanding of this subject before we start worrying and banning stuff that might be
helpful.
What is the public's understanding of synthetic biology?
Synthetic biology is such a young topic, that it is to be expected that the public is scared and
fear the risk of it. People relate synthetic biology as science fiction movies, such as Jurassic
Park. One third of the focus group thought it would be a good idea to ban synthetic biology while
studying it at the same time to learn more of its potential effects to the world. If you ban it, how
are you able to study it? Many people dont know know what synthetic biology is but get the jist
of it. Even I dont know what it really is because we only read about three or two articles. I think
we should let it be because we need to learn more of it. It could help us survive more in this
world and provide some great use. I think as the year pass by us more often, we will learn to
accept it because by then we will have more information about it.
Jaidee was kill. Akkarat thought he was just another bug in his way, but this bug has an army
now and it might of been a mistake to kill him.