Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Zion Dasilva
Meets standard
POINT
Does the point clearly answer the focus
question? Does the reader know what you are
trying to prove?
Point attempts to
answer focus
question, but thesis is
unclear.
No point is
evident.
EVIDENCE
Does the writer clearly support his/her point
using facts, reasons, examples, and/or details
from the text or research?
Evidence given is
relevant, effective,
and the best
possible to clearly
support point.
Evidence given is
relevant and
effective in
supporting point.
Evidence given
partially supports
point or is unclear.
No evidence is
given.
1 piece of evidence
is used.
Attempts to use
evidence
No attempt to
use evidence
CITATIONS
Is each piece of evidence properly cited?
Each piece of
evidence is properly
cited.
No evidence
citation is
evident.
EXPLANATIONS
Does the writer give enough context and
background information for the reader to
understand the significance of the evidence?
(Explain the evidence for reader who knows
nothing about your topic.)
Each piece of
evidence is cited, but
capitalization or
period placement is
off.
C & BI gives the
reader a general
understanding of the
evidence given.
Little to no C & BI
given. Reader
does not
understand the
evidence given.
Explanation
connects evidence
to the point and is
thorough,
thoughtful, and
builds on prior
arguments.
Concluding
sentences go
beyond summary to
tie argument to the
evidence given.
Explanation connects
evidence to the
point.
Explanation makes
some connection
(partial or
incomplete) to the
point.
No explanation of
how evidence
proves point is
given.
Concluding
sentences
summarize
argument in your
own words.
Concluding sentences
summarize argument
by re-stating your
original point.
Concluding
sentences are
absent or fail to
provide summary
of argument.
Concluding
statement
thoughtfully &
persuasively explains
overall significance
of argument.
Paper is completely
error-free.
Concluding
statement explains
overall significance
of argument.
Concluding statement
attempts to explain
overall significance of
argument.
Concluding
statement is not
present.
Paper is practically
error-free (1-2
grammatical errors).
Paper has 5 or
more
grammatical
errors.
TIE-BACK
Does the writer make a clear connection
between the evidence/explanation given and
their original point?
Does the writer provide a strong concluding
statement that explains the significance of
his/her point? Does it answer the So what?
PROOF-READING
Is it clear that the paper has been carefully
proof-read for grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors?
(3.5)
Approaches
Standard
(3)
Not Present
(0)
26.5 / 32
Did you meet proficiency?
YES
----- NO